• Re: Pam Blondi disgraced and humiliated dirty whore

    From super70s@super70s@super70s.invalid to alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.society.liberalism, alt.atheism, alt.politics.democrats.d, talk.politics.guns on Sun Oct 12 15:37:41 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.atheism

    During that circus of an oversight hearing this past week, Blondi
    refused to answer most questions posed to her by Democratic senators,
    or she lied. She said she "didn't know" if there is a video/audio
    recording of the crook Tom Homan accepting a $50,000 cash bribe. That's
    a lie. She cannot NOT know of the recording.

    Adam Schiff, rather than pose legitimate questions to the dirty whore
    Blondi that he knew she would either not answer or give lie answers,
    instead used his time to recite all the questions the whore Blondi had refused to answer. One of them was whether the attacks on boats in the Caribbean are legal, which of course the dirty whore Blondi refused to answer. But when Schiff mentioned that one, the dirty whore Blondi
    sneered, "Do you have a law degree, senator?" As a matter of fact,
    Schiff's law degree is from Harvard, 1985, cum laude. The dirty whore Blondi's law degree? From some fucking backwater called Stetson College
    of Law, 1990. It's not even clear that it's an accredited law school.

    Blondi's canned, staged, rehearsed performance before that oversight committee should lead to her impeachment and removal from office, and
    to her disbarment.

    You have to wonder why they even bother with these kabuki dance
    hearings for any current Republican official or judicial appointment.
    Say one thing and then do a 180-degree after they're confirmed.

    Maybe it provides good material for SNL cold opens but that's about it.

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From NoBody@NoBody@nowhere.com to alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.society.liberalism,alt.atheism,alt.politics.democrats.d,talk.politics.guns on Mon Oct 13 06:55:15 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.atheism

    On Sun, 12 Oct 2025 15:37:41 -0500, super70s
    <super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:

    During that circus of an oversight hearing this past week, Blondi
    refused to answer most questions posed to her by Democratic senators,
    or she lied. She said she "didn't know" if there is a video/audio
    recording of the crook Tom Homan accepting a $50,000 cash bribe. That's
    a lie. She cannot NOT know of the recording.

    Adam Schiff, rather than pose legitimate questions to the dirty whore
    Blondi that he knew she would either not answer or give lie answers,
    instead used his time to recite all the questions the whore Blondi had
    refused to answer. One of them was whether the attacks on boats in the
    Caribbean are legal, which of course the dirty whore Blondi refused to
    answer. But when Schiff mentioned that one, the dirty whore Blondi
    sneered, "Do you have a law degree, senator?" As a matter of fact,
    Schiff's law degree is from Harvard, 1985, cum laude. The dirty whore
    Blondi's law degree? From some fucking backwater called Stetson College
    of Law, 1990. It's not even clear that it's an accredited law school.

    Blondi's canned, staged, rehearsed performance before that oversight
    committee should lead to her impeachment and removal from office, and
    to her disbarment.

    You have to wonder why they even bother with these kabuki dance
    hearings for any current Republican official or judicial appointment.
    Say one thing and then do a 180-degree after they're confirmed.

    Maybe it provides good material for SNL cold opens but that's about it.

    The hearings themselves were for nothing more than the Dems to perform
    and not allow any questions to answered.

    Have you condemned the murder of Charlie Kirk?
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From NoBody@NoBody@nowhere.com to alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.society.liberalism,alt.atheism,alt.politics.democrats.d,talk.politics.guns on Tue Oct 14 06:52:05 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.atheism

    On Mon, 13 Oct 2025 06:55:15 -0400, NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On Sun, 12 Oct 2025 15:37:41 -0500, super70s
    <super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:

    During that circus of an oversight hearing this past week, Blondi
    refused to answer most questions posed to her by Democratic senators,
    or she lied. She said she "didn't know" if there is a video/audio
    recording of the crook Tom Homan accepting a $50,000 cash bribe. That's >>> a lie. She cannot NOT know of the recording.

    Adam Schiff, rather than pose legitimate questions to the dirty whore
    Blondi that he knew she would either not answer or give lie answers,
    instead used his time to recite all the questions the whore Blondi had
    refused to answer. One of them was whether the attacks on boats in the
    Caribbean are legal, which of course the dirty whore Blondi refused to
    answer. But when Schiff mentioned that one, the dirty whore Blondi
    sneered, "Do you have a law degree, senator?" As a matter of fact,
    Schiff's law degree is from Harvard, 1985, cum laude. The dirty whore
    Blondi's law degree? From some fucking backwater called Stetson College >>> of Law, 1990. It's not even clear that it's an accredited law school.

    Blondi's canned, staged, rehearsed performance before that oversight
    committee should lead to her impeachment and removal from office, and
    to her disbarment.

    You have to wonder why they even bother with these kabuki dance
    hearings for any current Republican official or judicial appointment.
    Say one thing and then do a 180-degree after they're confirmed.

    Maybe it provides good material for SNL cold opens but that's about it.

    The hearings themselves were for nothing more than the Dems to perform
    and not allow any questions to answered.

    Have you condemned the murder of Charlie Kirk?

    Silence from "super"...

    Laughter!
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2