| Sysop: | Amessyroom |
|---|---|
| Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
| Users: | 23 |
| Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
| Uptime: | 52:20:53 |
| Calls: | 583 |
| Files: | 1,139 |
| D/L today: |
149 files (19,108K bytes) |
| Messages: | 111,542 |
On Sun, 24 Aug 2025 13:06:23 -0500, Dawn Flood
<Dawn.Belle.Flood@gmail.com> wrote:
If you enter the query, "Would the instantaneous healing of an adult
amputee be a miracle?" into Google AI over & over, you get different
answers! It's like it is confused.
Here's one:
An instantaneous, complete healing of an adult amputee would, according
to many definitions, be considered a miracle. This is because it would
defy the known laws of human biology and healing, fitting the
traditional understanding of a supernatural event.
And, another:
Whether the instantaneous healing of an adult amputee is a miracle
depends on one's worldview and definition of a miracle. The scientific
and theological perspectives offer different interpretations of such an
event, which currently has no documented, verifiable occurrence in
modern history.
A third:
An instantaneous, complete healing of an adult amputee would almost
certainly be considered a miracle, as it would defy known scientific and
medical understanding . While definitions of a "miracle" vary across
beliefs, this event would align with the core components of most
theological and philosophical interpretations.
And, a last one:
That depends on one's worldview and definition of a miracle. Within most
religious contexts, the instantaneous, complete, and permanent regrowth
of a severed adult limb would almost certainly be considered a
miraculous event because it violates the known laws of human biology and
healing.
And, so, Google AI appears to be a bit confused! As for me, I like #3
the best.
Dawn
Famously according to Arthur C. Clarke, any sufficiently advanced
technology is indistinguishable from magic.
On 8/24/2025 3:06 PM, Vincent Maycock wrote:
On Sun, 24 Aug 2025 13:06:23 -0500, Dawn Flood
<Dawn.Belle.Flood@gmail.com> wrote:
If you enter the query, "Would the instantaneous healing of an adult
amputee be a miracle?" into Google AI over & over, you get different
answers! It's like it is confused.
Here's one:
An instantaneous, complete healing of an adult amputee would, according
to many definitions, be considered a miracle. This is because it would
defy the known laws of human biology and healing, fitting the
traditional understanding of a supernatural event.
And, another:
Whether the instantaneous healing of an adult amputee is a miracle
depends on one's worldview and definition of a miracle. The scientific
and theological perspectives offer different interpretations of such an
event, which currently has no documented, verifiable occurrence in
modern history.
A third:
An instantaneous, complete healing of an adult amputee would almost
certainly be considered a miracle, as it would defy known scientific and >>> medical understanding . While definitions of a "miracle" vary across
beliefs, this event would align with the core components of most
theological and philosophical interpretations.
And, a last one:
That depends on one's worldview and definition of a miracle. Within most >>> religious contexts, the instantaneous, complete, and permanent regrowth
of a severed adult limb would almost certainly be considered a
miraculous event because it violates the known laws of human biology and >>> healing.
And, so, Google AI appears to be a bit confused! As for me, I like #3
the best.
Dawn
Famously according to Arthur C. Clarke, any sufficiently advanced
technology is indistinguishable from magic.
I think that Mr. Clarke got this one wrong. If the Conservation Laws of >Nature (energy, momentum, linear and angular, electric charge, etc.) are >immutable (at least on microscopic scales), then any technology that any >civilization could develop would be described by some mathematical model.
Dawn
On Mon, 25 Aug 2025 21:08:01 -0500, Dawn Flood
<Dawn.Belle.Flood@gmail.com> wrote:
On 8/24/2025 3:06 PM, Vincent Maycock wrote:
On Sun, 24 Aug 2025 13:06:23 -0500, Dawn Flood
<Dawn.Belle.Flood@gmail.com> wrote:
If you enter the query, "Would the instantaneous healing of an adult
amputee be a miracle?" into Google AI over & over, you get different
answers! It's like it is confused.
Here's one:
An instantaneous, complete healing of an adult amputee would, according >>>> to many definitions, be considered a miracle. This is because it would >>>> defy the known laws of human biology and healing, fitting the
traditional understanding of a supernatural event.
And, another:
Whether the instantaneous healing of an adult amputee is a miracle
depends on one's worldview and definition of a miracle. The scientific >>>> and theological perspectives offer different interpretations of such an >>>> event, which currently has no documented, verifiable occurrence in
modern history.
A third:
An instantaneous, complete healing of an adult amputee would almost
certainly be considered a miracle, as it would defy known scientific and >>>> medical understanding . While definitions of a "miracle" vary across
beliefs, this event would align with the core components of most
theological and philosophical interpretations.
And, a last one:
That depends on one's worldview and definition of a miracle. Within most >>>> religious contexts, the instantaneous, complete, and permanent regrowth >>>> of a severed adult limb would almost certainly be considered a
miraculous event because it violates the known laws of human biology and >>>> healing.
And, so, Google AI appears to be a bit confused! As for me, I like #3 >>>> the best.
Dawn
Famously according to Arthur C. Clarke, any sufficiently advanced
technology is indistinguishable from magic.
I think that Mr. Clarke got this one wrong. If the Conservation Laws of
Nature (energy, momentum, linear and angular, electric charge, etc.) are
immutable (at least on microscopic scales), then any technology that any
civilization could develop would be described by some mathematical model.
Dawn
If an amputee regrows a limb, how do you know it's a miracle, rather
than the result of some (perhaps unknown) laws of physics?
If you enter the query, "Would the instantaneous healing of an adult amputee be a miracle?" into Google AI over & over, you get
different answers! It's like it is confused.
Here's one:
An instantaneous, complete healing of an adult amputee would, according to many definitions, be considered a miracle. This is
because it would defy the known laws of human biology and healing, fitting the traditional understanding of a supernatural event.
And, another:
Whether the instantaneous healing of an adult amputee is a miracle depends on one's worldview and definition of a miracle. The
scientific and theological perspectives offer different interpretations of such an event, which currently has no documented,
verifiable occurrence in modern history.
A third:
An instantaneous, complete healing of an adult amputee would almost certainly be considered a miracle, as it would defy known
scientific and medical understanding . While definitions of a "miracle" vary across beliefs, this event would align with the core
components of most theological and philosophical interpretations.
And, a last one:
That depends on one's worldview and definition of a miracle. Within most religious contexts, the instantaneous, complete, and
permanent regrowth of a severed adult limb would almost certainly be considered a miraculous event because it violates the known
laws of human biology and healing.
And, so, Google AI appears to be a bit confused!
As for me, I like #3 the best.
Dawn