From Newsgroup: alt.atheism

On 8/27/25 4:32 PM, Dawn Flood wrote:

I haven't

You haven't a clue.

Google: Pangenesis lysenkoism lamarckism

To show you how intentionally this Darwin fraud is, THIS is from
the Google A.I.'s comparison of pangenesis & lamarckism...

<Quote>
Darwin's theory of Pangenesis and Lamarckism both proposed
the inheritance of acquired characteristics as a mechanism
of evolution, with Lamarckism stating that traits developed
during an organism's lifetime were passed on, while
Pangenesis suggested the body produced "gemmules" that
collected in the gonads to be inherited.
</Quote>

HINT: BOTH state that traits acquired during an organisms
lifetime are passed on!

BOTH!

"Gemmules" are the means for passing these traits on!

THEY ARE THE SAME THING! Darwin just names his "Gemmules"
as the way traits are passed. That's all.

Now Google A.I.'s comparison of lysenkoism and lamarckism...

<Quote?
Lamarckism is an outdated evolutionary theory that claimed an
organism can pass on characteristics acquired during its lifetime
to its offspring.
</Quote>

It goes on to describe lysenkoism as pseudo scientific -- as if
lamarckism or pangenesis isn't -- and also calls it political. If
this is true then it's still one better than Darwin as he came
to it by way of sheer stupidity...

Darwin has ZERO incentive to go the pseudo scientific route. He
was just too stupid to know there was a difference!
--
https://jtem.tumblr.com/tagged/The%20Book%20of%20JTEM/page/5
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.atheism


Epigenetics is how your genetic information is modified by methylation
which shuts off certain genes when you are alive.
--
Vasos Panagiotopoulos panix.com/~vjp2/vasos.htm
---{Nothing herein constitutes advice. Everything fully disclaimed.}---
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.atheism

On 8/27/2025 11:44 PM, JTEM wrote:

On 8/27/25 4:32 PM, Dawn Flood wrote:

I haven't

You haven't a clue.

Google:-a Pangenesis lysenkoism lamarckism

To show you how intentionally this Darwin fraud is, THIS is from
the Google A.I.'s comparison of pangenesis & lamarckism...

<Quote>
Darwin's theory of Pangenesis and Lamarckism both proposed
the inheritance of acquired characteristics as a mechanism
of evolution, with Lamarckism stating that traits developed
during an organism's lifetime were passed on, while
Pangenesis suggested the body produced "gemmules" that
collected in the gonads to be inherited.
</Quote>

HINT:-a BOTH state that traits acquired during an organisms
lifetime are passed on!

BOTH!

"Gemmules" are the means for passing these traits on!

THEY ARE THE SAME THING! Darwin just names his "Gemmules"
as the way traits are passed. That's all.

Now Google A.I.'s comparison of lysenkoism and lamarckism...

<Quote?
Lamarckism is an outdated evolutionary theory that claimed an
organism can pass on characteristics acquired during its lifetime
to its offspring.
</Quote>

It goes on to describe lysenkoism as pseudo scientific -- as if
lamarckism or pangenesis isn't -- and also calls it political. If
this is true then it's still one better than Darwin as he came
to it by way of sheer stupidity...

Darwin has ZERO incentive to go the pseudo scientific route. He
was just too stupid to know there was a difference!

Okay, Darwin got some things wrong? And, your point is??

--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.atheism

On 8/28/25 7:44 PM, Dawn Flood wrote:

Okay, Darwin got some things wrong?

Darwin is a myth. He got nothing right. The man didn't even
believe in evolution. He was in agreement with those who
would later OUTLAW evolution.

Darwin harmed science. By becoming the name & face of
naturalism and burying Mendel he held back science in the
English speaking world for 20 years!

You've believed in a fairy tale your whole life!
--
https://jtem.tumblr.com/tagged/The%20Book%20of%20JTEM/page/5
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.atheism

On 8/29/2025 6:34 PM, JTEM wrote:

On 8/28/25 7:44 PM, Dawn Flood wrote:

Okay, Darwin got some things wrong?

Darwin is a myth. He got nothing right. The man didn't even
believe in evolution. He was in agreement with those who
would later OUTLAW evolution.

Darwin harmed science. By becoming the name & face of
naturalism and burying Mendel he held back science in the
English speaking world for 20 years!

You've believed in a fairy tale your whole life!

Why wasn't any of this mentioned at the Scopes Trial? What did BOTH
sides miss?? Both sides stated that Darwin believed & taught in
evolution. Once again, read it!

https://profjoecain.net/scopes-monkey-trial-1925-complete-trial-transcripts/

Here is the breakdown of the words:

evolution -- 819
Darwin -- 74
Origin of Species -- 12
Wallace -- 2
descent with modification -- 2

Go & see for yourself!!
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.atheism

On 8/29/25 11:46 PM, Dawn Flood wrote:

Why wasn't any of this mentioned at

"But, but, but I couldn't have been taught a myth! They would have
taught me that they were teaching me a myth if they had been
teaching me a myth all that time!"

Again, you have ZERO clue how to approach question, deconstruct
problems & pose a test. You are a moron. Period.
--
https://jtem.tumblr.com/tagged/The%20Book%20of%20JTEM/page/5
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2