| Sysop: | Amessyroom |
|---|---|
| Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
| Users: | 23 |
| Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
| Uptime: | 52:36:51 |
| Calls: | 583 |
| Files: | 1,139 |
| D/L today: |
179 files (27,921K bytes) |
| Messages: | 111,617 |
On 8/22/2025 6:03 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, trolled and lied:
"Klaus Schadenfreude" <karvatt@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:pqIpQ.9143$5E6d.6412@fx38.iad...
On 8/21/2025 8:15 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless
chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, trolled and lied:
"Klaus Schadenfreude" <karvatt@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:BzrpQ.28522$LeZ.7931@fx11.iad...
On 8/20/2025 6:43 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless >>>>> chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, trolled and lied:
"Klaus Schadenfreude" <karvatt@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:RwHnQ.32246$CQJe.9174@fx14.iad...
On 8/15/2025 4:14 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and
gutless chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, trolled and >>>>>>> lied:
"J Carlson" <notgenx32@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:107l95h$kvlr$1@dont- email.me...
On 8/14/2025 3:04 AM, "Attila," 84+ year old geriatric lying Nazi >>>>>>>>> shitbag and rapist, lied:
On Thu, 14 Aug 2025 01:53:10 +0000, Mitchell Holman
<noemail@aol.com> in alt.atheism with message-id
<XnsB33AD35C92002629555@69.80.102.12> wrote:
Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote in
news:h89q9klkic25u0ba9bk1cppoma7or55rhh@4ax.com:
On Wed, 13 Aug 2025 00:50:02 -0000 (UTC), pothead wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-08-12, Attila <prochoice@here.now> wrote:
<snip>
In today's environment no statement should be accepted as >>>>>>>>>>>>>> being true without verification.Same in my state.
Trust but verify.
Signature is also verified although I do wonder how accurate >>>>>>>>>>>>> that is
because my lawyer friend once advised me to make my signature >>>>>>>>>>>>> illegible and change the style often. Which I do.
the real question which the dims ignore is why are they so >>>>>>>>>>>>> vehemently opposed to voter ID?
Because Republicans are for it.
I need to show my driver's license to buy cough syrup for >>>>>>>>>>>>> goodness
sakes.
Seriously?
The reason is obvious.
The dims will have their cheating machine shutdown.
There is no other logical reason.
Yeah, there is. Republicans are *for* it.
The Republican agenda is to make voting so
hard and smear it so long that they can eliminate
it entirely.
Nonsense. Voting is easy and there are several options.
You want to remove the options and make it harder, you subhuman >>>>>>>>> Nazi filth.
Only the illegal options
There aren't any, scooter. Every state only implements legal
options.
If that were true
It is true, scooter.
Prove it then....
By definition, scooter, any voting option that a state has available on >>> election day is legal *on election day*.
Even if later these determined to be illegal, biased, or otherwise
utterly contrary to the ideal of free, fair and honest elections.
No voting method has been found to be that, scooter.
"Klaus Schadenfreude" <karvatt@gmail.com> wrote in message news:lz%pQ.214504$nuHb.31335@fx10.iad...
On 8/22/2025 6:03 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless
chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, trolled and lied:
"Klaus Schadenfreude" <karvatt@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:pqIpQ.9143$5E6d.6412@fx38.iad...
On 8/21/2025 8:15 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless >>>> chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, trolled and lied:
"Klaus Schadenfreude" <karvatt@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:BzrpQ.28522$LeZ.7931@fx11.iad...
On 8/20/2025 6:43 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless >>>>>> chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, trolled and lied: >>>>>>>
"Klaus Schadenfreude" <karvatt@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:RwHnQ.32246$CQJe.9174@fx14.iad...
On 8/15/2025 4:14 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutlessIf that were true
chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, trolled and lied: >>>>>>>>>
"J Carlson" <notgenx32@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:107l95h$kvlr$1@dont- email.me...
On 8/14/2025 3:04 AM, "Attila," 84+ year old geriatric lying Nazi >>>>>>>>>> shitbag and rapist, lied:
On Thu, 14 Aug 2025 01:53:10 +0000, Mitchell HolmanYou want to remove the options and make it harder, you subhuman Nazi
<noemail@aol.com> in alt.atheism with message-id
<XnsB33AD35C92002629555@69.80.102.12> wrote:
Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote in
news:h89q9klkic25u0ba9bk1cppoma7or55rhh@4ax.com:
On Wed, 13 Aug 2025 00:50:02 -0000 (UTC), pothead wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-08-12, Attila <prochoice@here.now> wrote:
<snip>
In today's environment no statement should be accepted as >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> being true without verification.Same in my state.
Trust but verify.
Signature is also verified although I do wonder how accurate that is
because my lawyer friend once advised me to make my signature >>>>>>>>>>>>>> illegible and change the style often. Which I do.
the real question which the dims ignore is why are they so >>>>>>>>>>>>>> vehemently opposed to voter ID?
Because Republicans are for it.
I need to show my driver's license to buy cough syrup for goodness
sakes.
Seriously?
The reason is obvious.
The dims will have their cheating machine shutdown. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> There is no other logical reason.
Yeah, there is.-a Republicans are *for* it.
-a-a-a-a The Republican agenda is to make voting so
hard and smear it so long that they can eliminate
it entirely.
Nonsense.-a Voting is easy and there are several options. >>>>>>>>>>
filth.
Only the illegal options
There aren't any, scooter. Every state only implements legal options. >>>>>>>
It is true, scooter.
Prove it then....
By definition, scooter, any voting option that a state has available on >>>> election day is legal *on election day*.
Even if later these determined to be illegal, biased, or otherwise utterly >>> contrary to the ideal of free, fair and honest elections.
No voting method has been found to be that, scooter.
So much for any assertion by Rudy that he knows what he is talking about
[stuff that is not voting methods erased]
On paper the fairness doctrine looks like a positive thing because who wouldn't want
fairness in reporting, right?
In truth it is censorship and allowed direct government regulation of the media.
And isn't it ironic that when Reagan canceled it the outcry was that the right wing conservatives
were going to control the media yet the way it turned out is that the left wing progressives
essentially control the media with the exception of possibly AM talk radio and who listens to that?
I can't even pick up AM radio where I live.
The so-called "Fairness Doctrine" was anything but. It was supposed to ensure >that broadcast news outlets carried a variety of opinions. What it actually did
was discourage news outlets from carrying any opinions at all.
Nearly all heavy-handed regulation of that type has really bad perverse effects.
Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) standards directly led to the scourge of SUVs.
On Sun, 24 Aug 2025 17:01:55 -0700, "F. Georg McDuffee" wrote:
The so-called "Fairness Doctrine" was anything but. It was supposed to ensure
that broadcast news outlets carried a variety of opinions. What it actually did
was discourage news outlets from carrying any opinions at all.
Lie. The very opposite is true.
Nearly all heavy-handed regulation of that type has really bad perverse effects.
Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) standards directly led to the scourge of SUVs.
Because trucks were exempted and SUVs used to be always based on truck chassis.
The fact is, the divisiveness currently seen in American politics
started in the nineties with the advent of Fox news.
No, it started in the '70s with All In The Family, when Joe Average heard >>antiestablishment opinions on TV. Then he heard Rush Limbaugh and thought, >>"Hey, he sounds like me." FOX News just told the news without the politically >>correct spin of the mainstream media.
It started when the Reagan Adminisration canceled the Fairness
Doctrine.
On 8/25/2025 12:37 PM, Governor Swill wrote:
On Sun, 24 Aug 2025 17:01:55 -0700, "F. Georg McDuffee" wrote:
The so-called "Fairness Doctrine" was anything but. It was supposed
to ensure that broadcast news outlets carried a variety of opinions.
What it actually did was discourage news outlets from carrying any
opinions at all.
Lie. The very opposite is true.
You're just wrong about that. Local broadcasters stopped hosting *any* opinions during the period the doctrine was in effect and enforced.
https://www.cato.org/article/sordid-history-fairness-doctrine#
But even worse, enforcement of the doctrine was selective depending on
which party controlled the administration.
Nearly all heavy-handed regulation of that type has really bad
perverse effects. Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) standards
directly led to the scourge of SUVs.
Because trucks were exempted and SUVs used to be always based on
truck chassis.
Correct.
On 25 Aug 2025, "F. Georg McDuffee" <gmcguffee@mcgoofy-associates.us>
posted some news:n53rQ.624429$xyt3.621768@fx15.iad:
On 8/25/2025 12:37 PM, Governor Swill wrote:
On Sun, 24 Aug 2025 17:01:55 -0700, "F. Georg McDuffee" wrote:
The so-called "Fairness Doctrine" was anything but. It was supposed
to ensure that broadcast news outlets carried a variety of opinions.
What it actually did was discourage news outlets from carrying any
opinions at all.
Lie. The very opposite is true.
You're just wrong about that. Local broadcasters stopped hosting *any*
opinions during the period the doctrine was in effect and enforced.
https://www.cato.org/article/sordid-history-fairness-doctrine#
But even worse, enforcement of the doctrine was selective depending on
which party controlled the administration.
Look what happened to the country when Democrats did.
Dogs
Nearly all heavy-handed regulation of that type has really bad
perverse effects. Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) standards
directly led to the scourge of SUVs.
Because trucks were exempted and SUVs used to be always based on
truck chassis.
Correct.
What do you know?
"Klaus Schadenfreude" <karvatt@gmail.com> wrote in message news:lz%pQ.214504$nuHb.31335@fx10.iad...
On 8/22/2025 6:03 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless
chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, trolled and lied:
"Klaus Schadenfreude" <karvatt@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:pqIpQ.9143$5E6d.6412@fx38.iad...
On 8/21/2025 8:15 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless >>>> chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, trolled and lied:
"Klaus Schadenfreude" <karvatt@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:BzrpQ.28522$LeZ.7931@fx11.iad...
On 8/20/2025 6:43 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless >>>>>> chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, trolled and lied: >>>>>>>
"Klaus Schadenfreude" <karvatt@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:RwHnQ.32246$CQJe.9174@fx14.iad...
On 8/15/2025 4:14 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutlessIf that were true
chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, trolled and lied: >>>>>>>>>
"J Carlson" <notgenx32@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:107l95h$kvlr$1@dont- email.me...
On 8/14/2025 3:04 AM, "Attila," 84+ year old geriatric lying Nazi >>>>>>>>>> shitbag and rapist, lied:
On Thu, 14 Aug 2025 01:53:10 +0000, Mitchell HolmanYou want to remove the options and make it harder, you subhuman Nazi
<noemail@aol.com> in alt.atheism with message-id
<XnsB33AD35C92002629555@69.80.102.12> wrote:
Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote in
news:h89q9klkic25u0ba9bk1cppoma7or55rhh@4ax.com:
On Wed, 13 Aug 2025 00:50:02 -0000 (UTC), pothead wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-08-12, Attila <prochoice@here.now> wrote:
<snip>
In today's environment no statement should be accepted as >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> being true without verification.Same in my state.
Trust but verify.
Signature is also verified although I do wonder how accurate that is
because my lawyer friend once advised me to make my signature >>>>>>>>>>>>>> illegible and change the style often. Which I do.
the real question which the dims ignore is why are they so >>>>>>>>>>>>>> vehemently opposed to voter ID?
Because Republicans are for it.
I need to show my driver's license to buy cough syrup for goodness
sakes.
Seriously?
The reason is obvious.
The dims will have their cheating machine shutdown. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> There is no other logical reason.
Yeah, there is.-a Republicans are *for* it.
-a-a-a-a The Republican agenda is to make voting so
hard and smear it so long that they can eliminate
it entirely.
Nonsense.-a Voting is easy and there are several options. >>>>>>>>>>
filth.
Only the illegal options
There aren't any, scooter. Every state only implements legal options. >>>>>>>
It is true, scooter.
Prove it then....
By definition, scooter, any voting option that a state has available on >>>> election day is legal *on election day*.
Even if later these determined to be illegal, biased, or otherwise utterly >>> contrary to the ideal of free, fair and honest elections.
No voting method has been found to be that, scooter.
So much for any assertion by Rudy that he knows what he is talking about
Gerrymandering
Voter suppression
Fraudulent absentee voting
Ineligible Voting
Buying Votes
Duplicate Voting.