• Re: Is there a mainstream ham radio manufactures that makes entirely an

    From Ottavio Caruso@21:1/5 to All on Sat Nov 23 15:11:17 2024
    Le 22/11/2024 à 16:56, David a écrit :
    On 22/11/2024 15:25, Ottavio Caruso wrote:
    I mean without programmed chips? And again, mainstream as in:
    established brand names, not experimental kits.

    In other words, apart from self builds, is analog ham dead?

    (Not that I have the money to buy it anyway, just curiosity)


    What do you classify as mainstream? Is this the Yaesu/Icom/Kenwood
    offerings?

    Yaesu/Icom/Kenwood have been offering rigs with programmable chips for
    ages.


    And what exactly do you mean by "analog ham" dead. There is plenty of
    SSB and CW* on the bands which are analogue modes using older kit
    without a microprocessor in sight.

    *in this context CW is considered to be an analogue mode.


    This is not the point. I mean a whole rig without digital stuff in it.


    --
    Ottavio Caruso

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Brian Morrison@21:1/5 to Ottavio Caruso on Sat Nov 23 15:30:45 2024
    On Sat, 23 Nov 2024 15:11:17 +0000
    Ottavio Caruso <ottavio2006-usenet2012@yahoo.com> wrote:

    *in this context CW is considered to be an analogue mode.


    This is not the point. I mean a whole rig without digital stuff in it.

    The last radios made by the big 3 Japanese manufacturers that had
    nothing digital in them were from the 1975-1980 period and even then
    there were small amounts of digital circuitry for things like selecting frequencies on IC-2E FM handhelds and driving the 7-segment LED display
    on an IC-245 multimode.

    If you want really fully analogue for 2m SSB/CW then try to find an
    IC-202E with its crystal VCXO tuning or maybe the Mizuho SB-2M.

    --

    Brian Morrison "No, his mind is not for rent
    To any god or government
    Always hopeful, but discontent
    He knows changes aren't permanent
    But change is"

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From mm0fmf@21:1/5 to Brian Morrison on Sat Nov 23 15:59:23 2024
    On 23/11/2024 15:30, Brian Morrison wrote:
    try to find an
    IC-202E with its crystal VCXO tuning or maybe the Mizuho SB-2M.

    Trio/Kenwood TR-7010. But not the one advertised on eBay producing 12W.
    If it's giving 12W it's been fucked with by with a rig-doctor.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Brian Morrison@21:1/5 to none@invalid.com on Sat Nov 23 16:20:11 2024
    On Sat, 23 Nov 2024 15:59:23 +0000
    mm0fmf <none@invalid.com> wrote:

    On 23/11/2024 15:30, Brian Morrison wrote:
    try to find an
    IC-202E with its crystal VCXO tuning or maybe the Mizuho SB-2M.

    Trio/Kenwood TR-7010. But not the one advertised on eBay producing
    12W. If it's giving 12W it's been fucked with by with a rig-doctor.

    Yes, indeed. Ex-factory they produced about 8W. I had one from 1979 and
    sold it in about 1990.

    --

    Brian Morrison "No, his mind is not for rent
    To any god or government
    Always hopeful, but discontent
    He knows changes aren't permanent
    But change is"

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From David@21:1/5 to Ottavio Caruso on Sat Nov 23 17:42:50 2024
    On 23/11/2024 15:11, Ottavio Caruso wrote:
    Le 22/11/2024 à 16:56, David a écrit :
    On 22/11/2024 15:25, Ottavio Caruso wrote:
    I mean without programmed chips? And again, mainstream as in:
    established brand names, not experimental kits.

    In other words, apart from self builds, is analog ham dead?

    (Not that I have the money to buy it anyway, just curiosity)


    What do you classify as mainstream? Is this the Yaesu/Icom/Kenwood
    offerings?

     Yaesu/Icom/Kenwood have been offering rigs with programmable chips for ages.


    And what exactly do you mean by "analog ham" dead. There is plenty of
    SSB and CW* on the bands which are analogue modes using older kit
    without a microprocessor in sight.

    *in this context CW is considered to be an analogue mode.


    This is not the point. I mean a whole rig without digital stuff in it.


    There's plenty of older kit still in service, many without even a semiconductor. The Codar AT5 80/160m tranmitter is one that comes to
    mind, along with the Heathkit HW and SB series rigs. Replacement valves
    can be readily sourced, but can be pricey (have you seen the prices
    asked for Mullard ECC83s?)

    Just keep clear of anything that uses a sweep tube in the PA, they are unobtainium.

    Or for something more modern and solid state but with NO microprocessors
    or digital displays and if QRP is your forte then look for one of the
    Heathkit QRP rigs such as the HW 7, HW8 or HW9. I'm specifically citing Heathkit for the reason that they are usually very repairable should
    something go wrong.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Brian@21:1/5 to Ottavio Caruso on Sun Nov 24 12:39:43 2024
    Ottavio Caruso <ottavio2006-usenet2012@yahoo.com> wrote:
    I mean without programmed chips? And again, mainstream as in:
    established brand names, not experimental kits.

    In other words, apart from self builds, is analog ham dead?

    (Not that I have the money to buy it anyway, just curiosity)


    I can’t think of anything new or even recent ( well over a decade if not
    two or more).

    I was first licensed in 1978 and ‘basic’ digital features crept in soon after - by basic features I mean displays etc. I suspect there were other digital functions but I don’t recall any.

    The early digital frequency synthesised radios ( as they were generally
    known) appeared around then.

    Yaesu made the FT227R ( I think that was the model), a 2m mobile which was
    very popular. Icom made the famous and highly successful IC2E which was the UV5r of the time ( albeit it Japanese quality etc).

    Then there was the Icom 2m multimode- IC211? Yaesu and Trio ( as Kenwood
    were in the UK at the time) countered by undating their 221 and 700 with digital displays but kept their analogue PPLs.


    It wasn’t long before digital took over.

    Companies which didn’t follow the trend vanished.

    KW, a UK company tried to come back - they had made some good HF kit - but, despite producing some good ‘ simple’ * designs, seem to have vanished- at least as far as I am aware.

    * not intended to be derogatory. I mean focusing on performance, not ‘bells and whistles’. The bottom line, people seem to favour lots of functions.
    I have several HF radios, including an IC708, a basic HF radio, and an IC756Pro3 ( top of the range at the time). I still prefer the 708 in some
    ways.

    If you want a basic HF radio, an IC 708 is a good choice, as is a Kenwood
    450. They are digital but not over the top.

    The 708 does need a good 12V supply. Jimbo will be along to tell you he
    hates it as it drops power out if the supply drops below 13V. I’ve not seen it that bad but some seem prone to it. I’ve tried two, both were ok down to 12V. You can add a DSP unit, if you can source one. It plugs internally. A
    15 min job. Easy to do.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ottavio Caruso@21:1/5 to All on Fri Nov 22 15:26:37 2024
    Le 22/11/2024 à 15:25, Ottavio Caruso a écrit :
    I mean without programmed chips? And again, mainstream as in:
    established brand names, not experimental kits.

    In other words, apart from self builds, is analog ham dead?

    (Not that I have the money to buy it anyway, just curiosity)


    s/manufactures/manufacturer.


    --
    Ottavio Caruso

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From David@21:1/5 to Ottavio Caruso on Fri Nov 22 16:56:05 2024
    On 22/11/2024 15:25, Ottavio Caruso wrote:
    I mean without programmed chips? And again, mainstream as in:
    established brand names, not experimental kits.

    In other words, apart from self builds, is analog ham dead?

    (Not that I have the money to buy it anyway, just curiosity)


    What do you classify as mainstream? Is this the Yaesu/Icom/Kenwood
    offerings?

    And what exactly do you mean by "analog ham" dead. There is plenty of
    SSB and CW* on the bands which are analogue modes using older kit
    without a microprocessor in sight.

    *in this context CW is considered to be an analogue mode.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From wicklowham@21:1/5 to Brian on Wed Nov 27 17:17:16 2024
    On 24/11/2024 12:39, Brian wrote:
    Yaesu made the FT227R ( I think that was the model), a 2m mobile which was very popular. Icom made the famous and highly successful IC2E which was the UV5r of the time ( albeit it Japanese quality etc).
    =======
    Yes ,the good old FT227R 2m-70cms handheld .......I still use ,now with
    3 pcs Li-Ion cell replacing the 10 pcs NiMH cells (providing 12 V @ 1.5Ah)
    The pancake type Li-cell for holding memory is long gone ,but by means
    of 2 Continent codes I can still happily use the radio in the USA
    (channel spacing 10kHz) as well as in Europe (channel spacing 12.5 kHz

    Frank , EI7KS , KN6WH ,GM0CSZ

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Brian@21:1/5 to wicklowham on Wed Nov 27 17:53:41 2024
    wicklowham <wicklowham.nospam@rfburns.eu> wrote:
    On 24/11/2024 12:39, Brian wrote:
    Yaesu made the FT227R ( I think that was the model), a 2m mobile which was >> very popular. Icom made the famous and highly successful IC2E which was the >> UV5r of the time ( albeit it Japanese quality etc).
    =======
    Yes ,the good old FT227R 2m-70cms handheld .......I still use ,now with
    3 pcs Li-Ion cell replacing the 10 pcs NiMH cells (providing 12 V @ 1.5Ah)
    The pancake type Li-cell for holding memory is long gone ,but by means
    of 2 Continent codes I can still happily use the radio in the USA
    (channel spacing 10kHz) as well as in Europe (channel spacing 12.5 kHz

    Frank , EI7KS , KN6WH ,GM0CSZ

    The FT227R was a mobile.

    I think the handheld was the FT207R- at least the 2m one.

    I’m stretching my memory - not least as I never owned either. I repaired a few.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Brian Morrison@21:1/5 to Brian on Thu Nov 28 19:43:22 2024
    On Wed, 27 Nov 2024 17:53:41 -0000 (UTC)
    Brian <noinv@lid.org> wrote:

    wicklowham <wicklowham.nospam@rfburns.eu> wrote:
    On 24/11/2024 12:39, Brian wrote:
    Yaesu made the FT227R ( I think that was the model), a 2m mobile
    which was very popular. Icom made the famous and highly successful
    IC2E which was the UV5r of the time ( albeit it Japanese quality
    etc).
    =======
    Yes ,the good old FT227R 2m-70cms handheld .......I still use ,now
    with 3 pcs Li-Ion cell replacing the 10 pcs NiMH cells (providing
    12 V @ 1.5Ah) The pancake type Li-cell for holding memory is long
    gone ,but by means of 2 Continent codes I can still happily use the
    radio in the USA (channel spacing 10kHz) as well as in Europe
    (channel spacing 12.5 kHz

    Frank , EI7KS , KN6WH ,GM0CSZ

    The FT227R was a mobile.

    I think the handheld was the FT207R- at least the 2m one.

    Yes, there was an FT-207R, and then the FT-208 and FT-209. The 70cm
    versions of the latter were the FT-708 and FT-709.

    There was a dual band version which was the FT-727R, I think that
    appeared in 1985 or maybe 1986.

    I had about 4 or 5 FT-709s until I got one that was reliable, one
    failed when the driver transistor died mid-QSO via GB3NK, another had a
    PLL which was unstable and produced a descending audio tone on Tx, a
    third had a faulty keypad switch so that the lock switch caused the
    whole thing to switch itself off. I recall exasperating one of the staff (Roger?) at ARE in Ealing, I pointed out that simply using a radio
    could not be viewed as abusing it.

    --

    Brian Morrison "No, his mind is not for rent
    To any god or government
    Always hopeful, but discontent
    He knows changes aren't permanent
    But change is"

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rambo@21:1/5 to Brian on Sun Dec 1 00:50:45 2024
    On Sun, 24 Nov 2024 12:39:43 -0000 (UTC), Brian <noinv@lid.org> wrote:

    Ottavio Caruso <ottavio2006-usenet2012@yahoo.com> wrote:
    I mean without programmed chips? And again, mainstream as in:
    established brand names, not experimental kits.

    In other words, apart from self builds, is analog ham dead?

    (Not that I have the money to buy it anyway, just curiosity)


    I canÆt think of anything new or even recent ( well over a decade if not
    two or more).

    I was first licensed in 1978 and æbasicÆ digital features crept in soon
    after - by basic features I mean displays etc. I suspect there were other >digital functions but I donÆt recall any.

    The early digital frequency synthesised radios ( as they were generally >known) appeared around then.

    Yaesu made the FT227R ( I think that was the model), a 2m mobile which was >very popular. Icom made the famous and highly successful IC2E which was the >UV5r of the time ( albeit it Japanese quality etc).

    Then there was the Icom 2m multimode- IC211? Yaesu and Trio ( as Kenwood >were in the UK at the time) countered by undating their 221 and 700 with >digital displays but kept their analogue PPLs.


    It wasnÆt long before digital took over.

    Companies which didnÆt follow the trend vanished.

    KW, a UK company tried to come back - they had made some good HF kit - but, >despite producing some good æ simpleÆ * designs, seem to have vanished- at >least as far as I am aware.

    * not intended to be derogatory. I mean focusing on performance, not æbells >and whistlesÆ. The bottom line, people seem to favour lots of functions.
    I have several HF radios, including an IC708, a basic HF radio, and an >IC756Pro3 ( top of the range at the time). I still prefer the 708 in some >ways.

    If you want a basic HF radio, an IC 708 is a good choice, as is a Kenwood >450. They are digital but not over the top.

    The 708 does need a good 12V supply. Jimbo will be along to tell you he
    hates it as it drops power out if the supply drops below 13V. IÆve not seen >it that bad but some seem prone to it. IÆve tried two, both were ok down to >12V. You can add a DSP unit, if you can source one. It plugs internally. A >15 min job. Easy to do.

    A real Radioman would know the difference between an Icom 708 and and
    an Icom 718 .........

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From mm0fmf@21:1/5 to Rambo on Sun Dec 1 09:11:05 2024
    On 01/12/2024 00:50, Rambo wrote:
    On Sun, 24 Nov 2024 12:39:43 -0000 (UTC), Brian <noinv@lid.org> wrote:

    Ottavio Caruso <ottavio2006-usenet2012@yahoo.com> wrote:
    I mean without programmed chips? And again, mainstream as in:
    established brand names, not experimental kits.

    In other words, apart from self builds, is analog ham dead?

    (Not that I have the money to buy it anyway, just curiosity)


    I can’t think of anything new or even recent ( well over a decade if not >> two or more).

    I was first licensed in 1978 and ‘basic’ digital features crept in soon >> after - by basic features I mean displays etc. I suspect there were other
    digital functions but I don’t recall any.

    The early digital frequency synthesised radios ( as they were generally
    known) appeared around then.

    Yaesu made the FT227R ( I think that was the model), a 2m mobile which was >> very popular. Icom made the famous and highly successful IC2E which was the >> UV5r of the time ( albeit it Japanese quality etc).

    Then there was the Icom 2m multimode- IC211? Yaesu and Trio ( as Kenwood
    were in the UK at the time) countered by undating their 221 and 700 with
    digital displays but kept their analogue PPLs.


    It wasn’t long before digital took over.

    Companies which didn’t follow the trend vanished.

    KW, a UK company tried to come back - they had made some good HF kit - but, >> despite producing some good ‘ simple’ * designs, seem to have vanished- at
    least as far as I am aware.

    * not intended to be derogatory. I mean focusing on performance, not ‘bells
    and whistles’. The bottom line, people seem to favour lots of functions. >> I have several HF radios, including an IC708, a basic HF radio, and an
    IC756Pro3 ( top of the range at the time). I still prefer the 708 in some
    ways.

    If you want a basic HF radio, an IC 708 is a good choice, as is a Kenwood
    450. They are digital but not over the top.

    The 708 does need a good 12V supply. Jimbo will be along to tell you he
    hates it as it drops power out if the supply drops below 13V. I’ve not seen
    it that bad but some seem prone to it. I’ve tried two, both were ok down to
    12V. You can add a DSP unit, if you can source one. It plugs internally. A >> 15 min job. Easy to do.

    A real Radioman would know the difference between an Icom 708 and and
    an Icom 718 .........

    A real radioman would have passed his full licence by now.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From A. non Eyemouse@21:1/5 to david@nospam.com on Sun Dec 22 21:07:32 2024
    In article <vht46q$1pvng$1@dont-email.me>, David <david@nospam.com> wrote:

    Just keep clear of anything that uses a sweep tube in the PA, they are >unobtainium.

    I can think of a lot of rigs that used _two_ sweep tubes in the PA.


    --
    Mouse.
    Where Morse meets House.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)