• Re: Damned Projects!

    From mas@a4.home@21:1/5 to All on Sat Dec 28 16:04:10 2024
    On Thu, 26 Dec 2024 19:29:11 +0000, Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com> >>>>> wrote:

    Gentlemen,

    I'm currently in the process of building a device which will shut off >>>>>> the power to a washing machine in the event of a hose failing and
    spewing water out all over the floor. This is an eventuality which has >>>>>> always caused me considerable angst, so I finally decided to do
    something about it. After all, those flimsy 'exhaust' hoses go brittle >>>>>> over time and having one split 'in action' could cause a significant >>>>>> amount of damage to the surrounding area in a very short time. Having >>>>>> something to cut the power off instantly as soon as the water hits the >>>>>> floor would be a very worthwhile addition to the utility room and
    beyond.

    I'm wondering about removing the washer intake valve from the washer
    and hard connecting it to the supply. No hoses. Then only one hose
    goes from the valve output to the washer and it only has water in it
    when the washer is filling.

    PS: Braided stainless steel isn't water tight. From what I've read
    what's inside and how the ends are crimped is more important.
    How long do real hydraulic hoses last? They don't have a stainless
    outer braid.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Wanderer@21:1/5 to Cursitor Doom on Sat Dec 28 12:39:15 2024
    On 2024-12-26 14:29, Cursitor Doom wrote:
    Gentlemen,

    I'm currently in the process of building a device which will shut off
    the power to a washing machine in the event of a hose failing and
    spewing water out all over the floor. This is an eventuality which has
    always caused me considerable angst, so I finally decided to do
    something about it. After all, those flimsy 'exhaust' hoses go brittle
    over time and having one split 'in action' could cause a significant
    amount of damage to the surrounding area in a very short time. Having something to cut the power off instantly as soon as the water hits the
    floor would be a very worthwhile addition to the utility room and
    beyond.
    I came up with a pretty simple design which I've already proven to
    work first time at the breadboarding stage. However, turning this
    concept into a practical proposition is taking *far* longer than I'd imagined. I am getting there, but *slowly* and was wondering whether
    other people here have the same sort of problem as I invariably do
    with these little personal projects they undertake?

    Your hydrophobic pal,
    CD


    The way I've seen water detectors done is with an LED angled to reflect off
    a piece of glass to a photodiode when the glass is dry. When the glass is wet the index of refraction of the glass/water is different from the glass/air and allows the light to pass through and not hit the photodiode. That's how automatic
    windshield wiper raindrop detectors work.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Lasse Langwadt@21:1/5 to Cursitor Doom on Sat Dec 28 18:58:37 2024
    On 12/26/24 20:29, Cursitor Doom wrote:
    Gentlemen,

    I'm currently in the process of building a device which will shut off
    the power to a washing machine in the event of a hose failing and
    spewing water out all over the floor. This is an eventuality which has
    always caused me considerable angst, so I finally decided to do
    something about it. After all, those flimsy 'exhaust' hoses go brittle
    over time and having one split 'in action' could cause a significant
    amount of damage to the surrounding area in a very short time. Having something to cut the power off instantly as soon as the water hits the
    floor would be a very worthwhile addition to the utility room and
    beyond.
    I came up with a pretty simple design which I've already proven to
    work first time at the breadboarding stage. However, turning this
    concept into a practical proposition is taking *far* longer than I'd imagined. I am getting there, but *slowly* and was wondering whether
    other people here have the same sort of problem as I invariably do
    with these little personal projects they undertake?

    Your hydrophobic pal,
    CD

    here some thing like this: https://www.micro-matic.dk/content-519750.html

    is mandatory for washing machines and dish washers

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Liz Tuddenham@21:1/5 to mas@a4.home on Sat Dec 28 20:37:14 2024
    <mas@a4.home> wrote:

    On Thu, 26 Dec 2024 19:29:11 +0000, Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com> >>>>> wrote:

    Gentlemen,

    I'm currently in the process of building a device which will shut off >>>>>> the power to a washing machine in the event of a hose failing and >>>>>> spewing water out all over the floor. This is an eventuality which has >>>>>> always caused me considerable angst, so I finally decided to do
    something about it. After all, those flimsy 'exhaust' hoses go brittle >>>>>> over time and having one split 'in action' could cause a significant >>>>>> amount of damage to the surrounding area in a very short time. Having >>>>>> something to cut the power off instantly as soon as the water hits the >>>>>> floor would be a very worthwhile addition to the utility room and >>>>>> beyond.

    I'm wondering about removing the washer intake valve from the washer
    and hard connecting it to the supply. No hoses.

    No filter either. The smallest piece of dirt can jam a valve open.

    --
    ~ Liz Tuddenham ~
    (Remove the ".invalid"s and add ".co.uk" to reply)
    www.poppyrecords.co.uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bill Sloman@21:1/5 to Wanderer on Sun Dec 29 18:01:18 2024
    On 28/12/2024 12:39 pm, Wanderer wrote:
    On 2024-12-26 14:29, Cursitor Doom wrote:
    Gentlemen,

    I'm currently in the process of building a device which will shut off
    the power to a washing machine in the event of a hose failing and
    spewing water out all over the floor. This is an eventuality which has
    always caused me considerable angst, so I finally decided to do
    something about it. After all, those flimsy 'exhaust' hoses go brittle
    over time and having one split 'in action' could cause a significant
    amount of damage to the surrounding area in a very short time. Having
    something to cut the power off instantly as soon as the water hits the
    floor would be a very worthwhile addition to the utility room and
    beyond.
    I came up with a pretty simple design which I've already proven to
    work first time at the breadboarding stage. However, turning this
    concept into a practical proposition is taking *far* longer than I'd
    imagined. I am getting there, but *slowly* and was wondering whether
    other people here have the same sort of problem as I invariably do
    with these little personal projects they undertake?

    Your hydrophobic pal,
    CD


    The way I've seen water detectors done is with an LED angled to reflect off
    a piece of glass to a photodiode when the glass is dry. When the glass is wet the index of refraction of the glass/water is different from the glass/air and
    allows the light to pass through and not hit the photodiode. That's how automatic
    windshield wiper raindrop detectors work.

    That's elegant. Transparent plastic would work as well, and might be
    less brittle. the theory is well understood and has some subtle aspects.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Total_internal_reflection

    --
    Bill Sloman, Sydney

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jasen Betts@21:1/5 to Carlos E.R. on Sun Jan 5 05:56:01 2025
    On 2024-12-29, Carlos E.R. <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote:
    On 2024-12-27 20:04, Don wrote:
    Electrolysis can cause the DC sensor to degrade over time.

    Use graphite. Two pencil leads.

    graphite is still eroded.


    --
    Jasen.
    πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦ Π‘Π»Π°Π²Π° Π£ΠΊΡ€Π°Ρ—Π½Ρ–

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Cursitor Doom@21:1/5 to Wanderer on Sun Dec 29 13:28:22 2024
    On Sat, 28 Dec 2024 12:39:15, Wanderer wrote:

    On 2024-12-26 14:29, Cursitor Doom wrote:
    Gentlemen,

    I'm currently in the process of building a device which will shut off
    the power to a washing machine in the event of a hose failing and
    spewing water out all over the floor. This is an eventuality which has
    always caused me considerable angst, so I finally decided to do
    something about it. After all, those flimsy 'exhaust' hoses go brittle
    over time and having one split 'in action' could cause a significant
    amount of damage to the surrounding area in a very short time. Having
    something to cut the power off instantly as soon as the water hits the
    floor would be a very worthwhile addition to the utility room and
    beyond.
    I came up with a pretty simple design which I've already proven to work
    first time at the breadboarding stage. However, turning this concept
    into a practical proposition is taking *far* longer than I'd imagined.
    I am getting there, but *slowly* and was wondering whether other people
    here have the same sort of problem as I invariably do with these little
    personal projects they undertake?

    Your hydrophobic pal,
    CD


    The way I've seen water detectors done is with an LED angled to reflect
    off a piece of glass to a photodiode when the glass is dry. When the
    glass is wet the index of refraction of the glass/water is different
    from the glass/air and allows the light to pass through and not hit the photodiode. That's how automatic windshield wiper raindrop detectors
    work.

    I kind of suspected that was how they worked; nice to have it confirmed.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Cursitor Doom@21:1/5 to Liz Tuddenham on Sun Dec 29 13:27:17 2024
    On Sat, 28 Dec 2024 20:37:14 +0000, Liz Tuddenham wrote:

    <mas@a4.home> wrote:

    On Thu, 26 Dec 2024 19:29:11 +0000, Cursitor Doom
    <cd@notformail.com>
    wrote:

    Gentlemen,

    I'm currently in the process of building a device which will
    shut off the power to a washing machine in the event of a hose
    failing and spewing water out all over the floor. This is an
    eventuality which has always caused me considerable angst, so I
    finally decided to do something about it. After all, those
    flimsy 'exhaust' hoses go brittle over time and having one split
    'in action' could cause a significant amount of damage to the
    surrounding area in a very short time. Having something to cut
    the power off instantly as soon as the water hits the floor
    would be a very worthwhile addition to the utility room and
    beyond.

    I'm wondering about removing the washer intake valve from the washer
    and hard connecting it to the supply. No hoses.

    No filter either. The smallest piece of dirt can jam a valve open.

    Those push-fit hoses are the worst by miles. I had one just let go out of
    the blue for no apparent reason (the usual failure mode!) This was on the
    high pressure water intake to the washing machine. Fortunately I was at
    home at the time in the bathroom next to the utility. I just heard this
    rushing sound which I quickly realised was escaping water. I was able to
    shut the supply off pretty much right away, but even so the floor was
    soaked with water seeping out into the passageway. After that little
    warning, I replaced all the push-fits in the house with conventional
    soldered copper pipe connections. Plumbers tell me the damn things are
    known for this kind of thing and become flaky after about 10 years.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Martin Brown@21:1/5 to mas@a4.home on Sun Dec 29 13:44:32 2024
    On 28/12/2024 16:04, mas@a4.home wrote:
    On Thu, 26 Dec 2024 19:29:11 +0000, Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com> >>>>>> wrote:

    Gentlemen,

    I'm currently in the process of building a device which will shut off >>>>>>> the power to a washing machine in the event of a hose failing and >>>>>>> spewing water out all over the floor. This is an eventuality which has >>>>>>> always caused me considerable angst, so I finally decided to do
    something about it. After all, those flimsy 'exhaust' hoses go brittle >>>>>>> over time and having one split 'in action' could cause a significant >>>>>>> amount of damage to the surrounding area in a very short time. Having >>>>>>> something to cut the power off instantly as soon as the water hits the >>>>>>> floor would be a very worthwhile addition to the utility room and >>>>>>> beyond.

    I'm wondering about removing the washer intake valve from the washer
    and hard connecting it to the supply. No hoses. Then only one hose
    goes from the valve output to the washer and it only has water in it
    when the washer is filling.

    That will be very interesting when the washing machine enters a spin dry
    cycle with a moderately unbalanced load and starts shaking violently.

    Replacing the hoses periodically is probably a much safer option YMMV.

    PS: Braided stainless steel isn't water tight. From what I've read
    what's inside and how the ends are crimped is more important.
    How long do real hydraulic hoses last? They don't have a stainless
    outer braid.

    Japanese washing machines are typically installed with a drip tray on
    mains drainage plumbed in underneath to accommodate any systematic
    failures. I have never seen than done anywhere else.

    --
    Martin Brown

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From mas@a4.home@21:1/5 to Martin Brown on Sun Dec 29 17:34:10 2024
    On 2024-12-29, Martin Brown <'''newspam'''@nonad.co.uk> wrote:
    On 28/12/2024 16:04, mas@a4.home wrote:
    I'm wondering about removing the washer intake valve from the washer
    and hard connecting it to the supply. No hoses. Then only one hose
    goes from the valve output to the washer and it only has water in it
    when the washer is filling.

    That will be very interesting when the washing machine enters a spin dry cycle with a moderately unbalanced load and starts shaking violently.

    Mine's spinning now, but not unbalanced. Doesn't yours automatically
    shut off if it shakes too hard?

    Replacing the hoses periodically is probably a much safer option YMMV.

    Yes, they need to be replaced as they were install back in the 1980s.

    No bulges, no stainless steel braid, real hoses, probably not made
    in China, perhaps USA?

    PS: Braided stainless steel isn't water tight. From what I've read
    what's inside and how the ends are crimped is more important.
    How long do real hydraulic hoses last? They don't have a stainless
    outer braid.

    Japanese washing machines are typically installed with a drip tray on
    mains drainage plumbed in underneath to accommodate any systematic
    failures. I have never seen than done anywhere else.

    I think that's a good idea but usually takes more of a house floorplan
    change than is all that easy. In a large house it would make senss
    to have a utility room with the washer and hot water header on a
    concrete floor with a floor drain...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Cursitor Doom@21:1/5 to Martin Brown on Sun Dec 29 17:54:44 2024
    On Sun, 29 Dec 2024 13:44:32 +0000, Martin Brown wrote:

    On 28/12/2024 16:04, mas@a4.home wrote:
    On Thu, 26 Dec 2024 19:29:11 +0000, Cursitor Doom
    <cd@notformail.com>
    wrote:

    Gentlemen,

    I'm currently in the process of building a device which will shut >>>>>>>> off the power to a washing machine in the event of a hose failing >>>>>>>> and spewing water out all over the floor. This is an eventuality >>>>>>>> which has always caused me considerable angst, so I finally
    decided to do something about it. After all, those flimsy
    'exhaust' hoses go brittle over time and having one split 'in
    action' could cause a significant amount of damage to the
    surrounding area in a very short time. Having something to cut >>>>>>>> the power off instantly as soon as the water hits the floor would >>>>>>>> be a very worthwhile addition to the utility room and beyond.

    I'm wondering about removing the washer intake valve from the washer
    and hard connecting it to the supply. No hoses. Then only one hose
    goes from the valve output to the washer and it only has water in it
    when the washer is filling.

    That will be very interesting when the washing machine enters a spin dry cycle with a moderately unbalanced load and starts shaking violently.

    LOL! Perhaps I should clarify. The hoses between the fixed plumbing and
    the machine itself are still rubber ones. But they're NOT push-fits. They screw-in.

    Replacing the hoses periodically is probably a much safer option YMMV.

    I would not sleep soundly with *any* push-fits anywhere in the house.
    That's why I had them all swapped-out for old-style copper.
    An ex-girlfriend of mine used to manage a care home for the old and
    feeble. One day, a push-fit failed and spewed water out which ended up cascading down the stairs like a tropical waterfall. All the staff on duty
    at the time were female, didn't know where the main stopcock was located
    and had *no* idea what to do other than call an emergency plumber. By the
    time that leak was remedied, tens of thousands of pounds of damage had
    been caused. Push-fit? NO THANKS.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Don@21:1/5 to Liz Tuddenham on Sun Dec 29 18:27:35 2024
    Liz Tuddenham wrote:
    Don wrote:

    Electrolysis can cause the DC sensor to degrade over time. An analog
    adaptation from resistance to capacitance can curb this effect. The
    above sensor needs to be altered to detect a dielectric difference
    instead of an ohmic resistance.

    Perhaps spme sort of adaptation of my conductivity meter circuit would
    do the job:
    <http://www.poppyrecords.co.uk/other/ConductivityMeter14.gif>

    It generates floating AC with prevents electrolysis at the sensor and
    uses synchronous rectification to eliminate spurious responses. For simplicity, the range switch could be replaced by a pot and the meter
    drivers arranged to switch a relay.

    Do the five Schmidt triggers in parallel after the oscillator act as a
    buffer? This guy follows your example:

    <https://www.electroschematics.com/simple-water-detector-circuit/>

    All things considered, Wanderer's refractive sensor looks like the best
    bet so far.

    And now some comic relief for the artistic, mad man mentality; a Fritzed
    555 AC water sensor:

    <https://www.instructables.com/Capacitive-Sensor-Reworked-Wemos-With-555-Timer-Ba/>

    Danke,

    --
    Don, KB7RPU, https://www.qsl.net/kb7rpu
    There was a young lady named Bright Whose speed was far faster than light;
    She set out one day In a relative way And returned on the previous night.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Don@21:1/5 to Wanderer on Sun Dec 29 18:28:24 2024
    Wanderer wrote:
    Cursitor Doom wrote:
    Gentlemen,

    I'm currently in the process of building a device which will shut off
    the power to a washing machine in the event of a hose failing and
    spewing water out all over the floor. This is an eventuality which has
    always caused me considerable angst, so I finally decided to do
    something about it. After all, those flimsy 'exhaust' hoses go brittle
    over time and having one split 'in action' could cause a significant
    amount of damage to the surrounding area in a very short time. Having
    something to cut the power off instantly as soon as the water hits the
    floor would be a very worthwhile addition to the utility room and
    beyond.
    I came up with a pretty simple design which I've already proven to
    work first time at the breadboarding stage. However, turning this
    concept into a practical proposition is taking *far* longer than I'd
    imagined. I am getting there, but *slowly* and was wondering whether
    other people here have the same sort of problem as I invariably do
    with these little personal projects they undertake?

    Your hydrophobic pal,
    CD


    The way I've seen water detectors done is with an LED angled to reflect off
    a piece of glass to a photodiode when the glass is dry. When the glass is wet the index of refraction of the glass/water is different from the glass/air and
    allows the light to pass through and not hit the photodiode. That's how automatic
    windshield wiper raindrop detectors work.

    Here's the physics of a rain sensor:

    <https://www.yoctopuce.com/EN/article/how-to-build-a-rain-sensor>

    When you rotate this sensor on its side it ought to work:

    <https://www.instructables.com/Measuring-the-Refractive-Index-of-Liquid-at-a-Defi/>

    If it's high enough, you probably can fabricate (print) it as a single
    piece and leave the cover off altogether.

    Danke,

    --
    Don, KB7RPU, https://www.qsl.net/kb7rpu
    There was a young lady named Bright Whose speed was far faster than light;
    She set out one day In a relative way And returned on the previous night.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Don@21:1/5 to Wanderer on Sun Dec 29 18:38:02 2024
    See addendum at bottom.

    Wanderer wrote:
    Cursitor Doom wrote:
    Gentlemen,

    I'm currently in the process of building a device which will shut off
    the power to a washing machine in the event of a hose failing and
    spewing water out all over the floor. This is an eventuality which has
    always caused me considerable angst, so I finally decided to do
    something about it. After all, those flimsy 'exhaust' hoses go brittle
    over time and having one split 'in action' could cause a significant
    amount of damage to the surrounding area in a very short time. Having
    something to cut the power off instantly as soon as the water hits the
    floor would be a very worthwhile addition to the utility room and
    beyond.
    I came up with a pretty simple design which I've already proven to
    work first time at the breadboarding stage. However, turning this
    concept into a practical proposition is taking *far* longer than I'd
    imagined. I am getting there, but *slowly* and was wondering whether
    other people here have the same sort of problem as I invariably do
    with these little personal projects they undertake?

    Your hydrophobic pal,
    CD


    The way I've seen water detectors done is with an LED angled to reflect off
    a piece of glass to a photodiode when the glass is dry. When the glass is wet the index of refraction of the glass/water is different from the glass/air and
    allows the light to pass through and not hit the photodiode. That's how automatic
    windshield wiper raindrop detectors work.

    Here's the physics of a rain sensor:

    <https://www.yoctopuce.com/EN/article/how-to-build-a-rain-sensor>

    When you rotate this sensor on its side it ought to work:

    <https://www.instructables.com/Measuring-the-Refractive-Index-of-Liquid-at-a-Defi/>

    If it's high enough, you probably can fabricate (print) it as a single
    piece and leave the cover off altogether.

    On the other hand, a cover does keep the dust out. Accumulated dust appears
    to be the bane of a refractive water sensor.

    Danke,

    --
    Don, KB7RPU, https://www.qsl.net/kb7rpu
    There was a young lady named Bright Whose speed was far faster than light;
    She set out one day In a relative way And returned on the previous night.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Liz Tuddenham@21:1/5 to Don on Sun Dec 29 19:16:00 2024
    Don <g@crcomp.net> wrote:

    Liz Tuddenham wrote:
    Don wrote:

    Electrolysis can cause the DC sensor to degrade over time. An analog
    adaptation from resistance to capacitance can curb this effect. The
    above sensor needs to be altered to detect a dielectric difference
    instead of an ohmic resistance.

    Perhaps spme sort of adaptation of my conductivity meter circuit would
    do the job:
    <http://www.poppyrecords.co.uk/other/ConductivityMeter14.gif>

    It generates floating AC with prevents electrolysis at the sensor and
    uses synchronous rectification to eliminate spurious responses. For simplicity, the range switch could be replaced by a pot and the meter drivers arranged to switch a relay.

    Do the five Schmidt triggers in parallel after the oscillator act as a buffer?

    In this pareticular application, the source impedance of the signal is effectively in series with the resistance of the conductivity cell, so
    it needs to be as low as possible or it will affect the linearity of the highest conductivity range. This resistance is made 0.5 ohms by the
    bottom resistor of the voltage divider which drives the cell. (Two
    1-ohm resistors in parallel)

    That means that the top resistor of the divider needs to be in the
    region of 750 ohms to get a reasonable signal. Such a low impedance
    across the output of a CD40106 could cause current limiting which would
    give unpredicatable output levels, so several sections in parallel
    ensure that there is no overloading. All the sections must be driven identically and be in the same chip, so that there is no significant
    time difference to give rise to a moment when one output switches before another and a huge current spike is drawn from the supply.

    Besides, what ekse could you do with all those unused gates?


    --
    ~ Liz Tuddenham ~
    (Remove the ".invalid"s and add ".co.uk" to reply)
    www.poppyrecords.co.uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Joe Gwinn@21:1/5 to cd999666@notformail.com on Sun Dec 29 17:10:12 2024
    On Sun, 29 Dec 2024 17:54:44 -0000 (UTC), Cursitor Doom <cd999666@notformail.com> wrote:

    On Sun, 29 Dec 2024 13:44:32 +0000, Martin Brown wrote:

    On 28/12/2024 16:04, mas@a4.home wrote:
    On Thu, 26 Dec 2024 19:29:11 +0000, Cursitor Doom
    <cd@notformail.com>
    wrote:

    Gentlemen,

    I'm currently in the process of building a device which will shut >>>>>>>>> off the power to a washing machine in the event of a hose failing >>>>>>>>> and spewing water out all over the floor. This is an eventuality >>>>>>>>> which has always caused me considerable angst, so I finally
    decided to do something about it. After all, those flimsy
    'exhaust' hoses go brittle over time and having one split 'in >>>>>>>>> action' could cause a significant amount of damage to the
    surrounding area in a very short time. Having something to cut >>>>>>>>> the power off instantly as soon as the water hits the floor would >>>>>>>>> be a very worthwhile addition to the utility room and beyond.

    I'm wondering about removing the washer intake valve from the washer
    and hard connecting it to the supply. No hoses. Then only one hose
    goes from the valve output to the washer and it only has water in it
    when the washer is filling.

    That will be very interesting when the washing machine enters a spin dry
    cycle with a moderately unbalanced load and starts shaking violently.

    LOL! Perhaps I should clarify. The hoses between the fixed plumbing and
    the machine itself are still rubber ones. But they're NOT push-fits. They >screw-in.

    Replacing the hoses periodically is probably a much safer option YMMV.

    I would not sleep soundly with *any* push-fits anywhere in the house.
    That's why I had them all swapped-out for old-style copper.
    An ex-girlfriend of mine used to manage a care home for the old and
    feeble. One day, a push-fit failed and spewed water out which ended up >cascading down the stairs like a tropical waterfall. All the staff on duty
    at the time were female, didn't know where the main stopcock was located
    and had *no* idea what to do other than call an emergency plumber. By the >time that leak was remedied, tens of thousands of pounds of damage had
    been caused. Push-fit? NO THANKS.

    I would also recommend that the female staff all be taught how to turn
    the water off. It isn't all that hard.

    Joe Gwinn

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Carlos E.R.@21:1/5 to Wanderer on Sun Dec 29 23:26:15 2024
    On 2024-12-28 12:39, Wanderer wrote:
    On 2024-12-26 14:29, Cursitor Doom wrote:
    Gentlemen,

    ...


    The way I've seen water detectors done is with an LED angled to reflect off
    a piece of glass to a photodiode when the glass is dry. When the glass is wet the index of refraction of the glass/water is different from the glass/air and
    allows the light to pass through and not hit the photodiode. That's how automatic
    windshield wiper raindrop detectors work.

    An optic fibre glass will do as well. Shaped in a curve, without the
    cover. When wet, the light gets out of the fibre. You may have to search
    for the right fibre, but I have seen this used commercially.

    --
    Cheers, Carlos.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Carlos E.R.@21:1/5 to Don on Sun Dec 29 23:21:08 2024
    On 2024-12-27 20:04, Don wrote:
    Electrolysis can cause the DC sensor to degrade over time.

    Use graphite. Two pencil leads.

    --
    Cheers, Carlos.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Martin Brown@21:1/5 to Jasen Betts on Sun Jan 5 11:22:59 2025
    On 05/01/2025 05:56, Jasen Betts wrote:
    On 2024-12-29, Carlos E.R. <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote:
    On 2024-12-27 20:04, Don wrote:

    Electrolysis can cause the DC sensor to degrade over time.

    Use graphite. Two pencil leads.

    graphite is still eroded.

    Not very quickly though so for a sensor where being wet is an immediate
    fault condition I doubt if it really matters. You could always use gold
    plated contacts or if money was no object pure platinum electrodes.

    Both of those noble metals are almost impervious to corrosion.

    --
    Martin Brown

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Cursitor Doom@21:1/5 to Martin Brown on Sun Jan 5 17:47:59 2025
    On Sun, 5 Jan 2025 11:22:59 +0000, Martin Brown wrote:

    On 05/01/2025 05:56, Jasen Betts wrote:
    On 2024-12-29, Carlos E.R. <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote:
    On 2024-12-27 20:04, Don wrote:

    Electrolysis can cause the DC sensor to degrade over time.

    Use graphite. Two pencil leads.

    graphite is still eroded.

    Not very quickly though so for a sensor where being wet is an immediate
    fault condition I doubt if it really matters. You could always use gold plated contacts or if money was no object pure platinum electrodes.

    Both of those noble metals are almost impervious to corrosion.

    Almost? You can bury a gold coin in whatever ground you like and if you
    lived long enough to dig it up again 1,000 years later, it would be just
    as you left it. That is a truly remarkable property of noble metals
    (especially since they're also a store of value and aren't eroded by
    inflation any more than they are by oxidation/corrosion. In Roman times,
    an ounce of gold would buy you a decent hand-made suit of the style of the time. Today an ounce of gold will *still* be worth enough to buy a hand-
    made suit. Remarkable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Don@21:1/5 to Carlos E.R. on Tue Dec 31 16:12:01 2024
    Carlos E.R. wrote:
    Don wrote:
    Electrolysis can cause the DC sensor to degrade over time.

    Use graphite. Two pencil leads.

    You can probably adapt this technique to the task:

    Make your own non-inductive graphite resistors
    <http://www.troelsgravesen.dk/graphite.htm>

    Is electrolysis mitigation the sole benefit of using AC instead of DC?
    Is there any other reason to prefer AC?

    Danke,

    --
    Don, KB7RPU, https://www.qsl.net/kb7rpu
    There was a young lady named Bright Whose speed was far faster than light;
    She set out one day In a relative way And returned on the previous night.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Liz Tuddenham@21:1/5 to Don on Tue Dec 31 17:59:00 2024
    Don <g@crcomp.net> wrote:

    Carlos E.R. wrote:
    Don wrote:
    Electrolysis can cause the DC sensor to degrade over time.

    Use graphite. Two pencil leads.

    You can probably adapt this technique to the task:

    Make your own non-inductive graphite resistors
    <http://www.troelsgravesen.dk/graphite.htm>

    Is electrolysis mitigation the sole benefit of using AC instead of DC?
    Is there any other reason to prefer AC?

    There are two effects caused by electrolysis: it attacks the electrodes
    and it builds up a non-conductive film of gasses. Even if the
    electrodes are made of something non-corrodable like carbon or platinum,
    the sensor will rapidly go high imnpedance because of the gas film..
    For both short and long-term stability, it is better to use AC.

    Another problem is detecting the change caused by an increase in
    conductivity. A pair of electrodes will develop an electrode potential
    of possible more than 1V, the sensing system for DC needs a signal significantly greater than this for reliable operation. High voltages
    will overcome the gassifying effect but may lead to the formation of
    reaction products between the electrodes and the electrolyte, which may
    turn out to be poisonous.

    The last thing you want to discover if your kitchen floods is that the
    sensor has rendered tha puddle electrically live and toxic.


    --
    ~ Liz Tuddenham ~
    (Remove the ".invalid"s and add ".co.uk" to reply)
    www.poppyrecords.co.uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Joe Gwinn@21:1/5 to Don on Tue Dec 31 12:19:58 2024
    On Tue, 31 Dec 2024 16:12:01 -0000 (UTC), "Don" <g@crcomp.net> wrote:

    Carlos E.R. wrote:
    Don wrote:
    Electrolysis can cause the DC sensor to degrade over time.

    Use graphite. Two pencil leads.

    You can probably adapt this technique to the task:

    Make your own non-inductive graphite resistors
    <http://www.troelsgravesen.dk/graphite.htm>

    Is electrolysis mitigation the sole benefit of using AC instead of DC?
    Is there any other reason to prefer AC?

    Operating at say a kilohertz or so gets one well above the flicker
    noise down around zero hertz., greatly improving SNR.

    Joe Gwinn

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Cursitor Doom@21:1/5 to All on Thu Dec 26 19:29:11 2024
    Gentlemen,

    I'm currently in the process of building a device which will shut off
    the power to a washing machine in the event of a hose failing and
    spewing water out all over the floor. This is an eventuality which has
    always caused me considerable angst, so I finally decided to do
    something about it. After all, those flimsy 'exhaust' hoses go brittle
    over time and having one split 'in action' could cause a significant
    amount of damage to the surrounding area in a very short time. Having
    something to cut the power off instantly as soon as the water hits the
    floor would be a very worthwhile addition to the utility room and
    beyond.
    I came up with a pretty simple design which I've already proven to
    work first time at the breadboarding stage. However, turning this
    concept into a practical proposition is taking *far* longer than I'd
    imagined. I am getting there, but *slowly* and was wondering whether
    other people here have the same sort of problem as I invariably do
    with these little personal projects they undertake?

    Your hydrophobic pal,
    CD

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From john larkin@21:1/5 to All on Thu Dec 26 15:09:38 2024
    On Thu, 26 Dec 2024 19:29:11 +0000, Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com>
    wrote:

    Gentlemen,

    I'm currently in the process of building a device which will shut off
    the power to a washing machine in the event of a hose failing and
    spewing water out all over the floor. This is an eventuality which has
    always caused me considerable angst, so I finally decided to do
    something about it. After all, those flimsy 'exhaust' hoses go brittle
    over time and having one split 'in action' could cause a significant
    amount of damage to the surrounding area in a very short time. Having >something to cut the power off instantly as soon as the water hits the
    floor would be a very worthwhile addition to the utility room and
    beyond.
    I came up with a pretty simple design which I've already proven to
    work first time at the breadboarding stage. However, turning this
    concept into a practical proposition is taking *far* longer than I'd >imagined. I am getting there, but *slowly* and was wondering whether
    other people here have the same sort of problem as I invariably do
    with these little personal projects they undertake?

    Your hydrophobic pal,
    CD

    Tell us about your design.

    I recall a water detector made from a clothespin and an aspirin and a
    couple of pieces of wire.

    But it doesn't take much current to turn on a mosfet.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Phil Hobbs@21:1/5 to Cursitor Doom on Thu Dec 26 18:02:31 2024
    On 2024-12-26 14:29, Cursitor Doom wrote:
    Gentlemen,

    I'm currently in the process of building a device which will shut off
    the power to a washing machine in the event of a hose failing and
    spewing water out all over the floor. This is an eventuality which has
    always caused me considerable angst, so I finally decided to do
    something about it. After all, those flimsy 'exhaust' hoses go brittle
    over time and having one split 'in action' could cause a significant
    amount of damage to the surrounding area in a very short time. Having something to cut the power off instantly as soon as the water hits the
    floor would be a very worthwhile addition to the utility room and
    beyond.
    I came up with a pretty simple design which I've already proven to
    work first time at the breadboarding stage. However, turning this
    concept into a practical proposition is taking *far* longer than I'd imagined. I am getting there, but *slowly* and was wondering whether
    other people here have the same sort of problem as I invariably do
    with these little personal projects they undertake?

    Your hydrophobic pal,
    CD


    I generally like to nail this sort of problem to the floor, e.g. by
    buying better quality drain hose, such as braid-reinforced silicone.

    My washing machine is in the basement, so a bit of water on the floor is
    no big deal.

    Cheers

    Phil Hobbs

    --
    Dr Philip C D Hobbs
    Principal Consultant
    ElectroOptical Innovations LLC / Hobbs ElectroOptics
    Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics
    Briarcliff Manor NY 10510

    http://electrooptical.net
    http://hobbs-eo.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Cursitor Doom@21:1/5 to All on Fri Dec 27 01:21:56 2024
    On Thu, 26 Dec 2024 15:09:38 -0800, john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com>
    wrote:

    On Thu, 26 Dec 2024 19:29:11 +0000, Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com>
    wrote:

    Gentlemen,

    I'm currently in the process of building a device which will shut off
    the power to a washing machine in the event of a hose failing and
    spewing water out all over the floor. This is an eventuality which has >>always caused me considerable angst, so I finally decided to do
    something about it. After all, those flimsy 'exhaust' hoses go brittle
    over time and having one split 'in action' could cause a significant
    amount of damage to the surrounding area in a very short time. Having >>something to cut the power off instantly as soon as the water hits the >>floor would be a very worthwhile addition to the utility room and
    beyond.
    I came up with a pretty simple design which I've already proven to
    work first time at the breadboarding stage. However, turning this
    concept into a practical proposition is taking *far* longer than I'd >>imagined. I am getting there, but *slowly* and was wondering whether
    other people here have the same sort of problem as I invariably do
    with these little personal projects they undertake?

    Your hydrophobic pal,
    CD

    Tell us about your design.

    I recall a water detector made from a clothespin and an aspirin and a
    couple of pieces of wire.

    But it doesn't take much current to turn on a mosfet.

    True, and that's what my design relies on. I say "design" but that's over-dignifying it. I doubt there's more than 10 components to it all
    told - tops! Still, the most important thing is it works.
    How did the pin/aspirin desgin work??

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Cursitor Doom@21:1/5 to All on Fri Dec 27 01:19:39 2024
    On Thu, 26 Dec 2024 15:09:38 -0800, john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com>
    wrote:

    On Thu, 26 Dec 2024 19:29:11 +0000, Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com>
    wrote:

    Gentlemen,

    I'm currently in the process of building a device which will shut off
    the power to a washing machine in the event of a hose failing and
    spewing water out all over the floor. This is an eventuality which has >>always caused me considerable angst, so I finally decided to do
    something about it. After all, those flimsy 'exhaust' hoses go brittle
    over time and having one split 'in action' could cause a significant
    amount of damage to the surrounding area in a very short time. Having >>something to cut the power off instantly as soon as the water hits the >>floor would be a very worthwhile addition to the utility room and
    beyond.
    I came up with a pretty simple design which I've already proven to
    work first time at the breadboarding stage. However, turning this
    concept into a practical proposition is taking *far* longer than I'd >>imagined. I am getting there, but *slowly* and was wondering whether
    other people here have the same sort of problem as I invariably do
    with these little personal projects they undertake?

    Your hydrophobic pal,
    CD

    Tell us about your design.

    I recall a water detector made from a clothespin and an aspirin and a
    couple of pieces of wire.

    But it doesn't take much current to turn on a mosfet.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bill Sloman@21:1/5 to Cursitor Doom on Fri Dec 27 15:02:41 2024
    On 27/12/2024 6:29 am, Cursitor Doom wrote:
    Gentlemen,

    I'm currently in the process of building a device which will shut off
    the power to a washing machine in the event of a hose failing and
    spewing water out all over the floor. This is an eventuality which has
    always caused me considerable angst, so I finally decided to do
    something about it. After all, those flimsy 'exhaust' hoses go brittle
    over time and having one split 'in action' could cause a significant
    amount of damage to the surrounding area in a very short time. Having something to cut the power off instantly as soon as the water hits the
    floor would be a very worthwhile addition to the utility room and
    beyond.
    I came up with a pretty simple design which I've already proven to
    work first time at the breadboarding stage. However, turning this
    concept into a practical proposition is taking *far* longer than I'd imagined. I am getting there, but *slowly* and was wondering whether
    other people here have the same sort of problem as I invariably do
    with these little personal projects they undertake?

    Your hydrophobic pal,

    The last time my hot-water tank pin-holed through and spread water all
    over the floor, the plumber that replaced the tank put a shallow
    water-catching tray underneath the new tank and put a battery-operated
    stop valve into the cold water feed. The stop valve can with a water
    sensor that sat in the tray, and turns off the cold water feed if there
    water in the tray.

    It's one more thing that screams at me when it's batteries get close to
    running out, but that's less of a pain than a lot of water wrecking the
    carpet, or the parquet that replaced it.

    Talk to your local plumbing supplier - it's madness to waste time on
    design when you can buy something off the shelf.

    --
    Bill Sloman, Sydney

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From bitrex@21:1/5 to Cursitor Doom on Fri Dec 27 01:09:56 2024
    On 12/26/2024 2:29 PM, Cursitor Doom wrote:
    Gentlemen,


    <snip>

    I came up with a pretty simple design which I've already proven to
    work first time at the breadboarding stage. However, turning this
    concept into a practical proposition is taking *far* longer than I'd imagined. I am getting there, but *slowly* and was wondering whether
    other people here have the same sort of problem as I invariably do
    with these little personal projects they undertake?

    It's called getting old bro

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Arie de Muijnck@21:1/5 to Cursitor Doom on Fri Dec 27 08:30:05 2024
    On 2024-12-27 02:21, Cursitor Doom wrote:
    On Thu, 26 Dec 2024 15:09:38 -0800, john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com>
    wrote:

    On Thu, 26 Dec 2024 19:29:11 +0000, Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com>
    wrote:

    Gentlemen,

    I'm currently in the process of building a device which will shut off
    the power to a washing machine in the event of a hose failing and
    spewing water out all over the floor. This is an eventuality which has
    always caused me considerable angst, so I finally decided to do
    something about it. After all, those flimsy 'exhaust' hoses go brittle
    over time and having one split 'in action' could cause a significant
    amount of damage to the surrounding area in a very short time. Having
    something to cut the power off instantly as soon as the water hits the
    floor would be a very worthwhile addition to the utility room and
    beyond.
    I came up with a pretty simple design which I've already proven to
    work first time at the breadboarding stage. However, turning this
    concept into a practical proposition is taking *far* longer than I'd
    imagined. I am getting there, but *slowly* and was wondering whether
    other people here have the same sort of problem as I invariably do
    with these little personal projects they undertake?

    Your hydrophobic pal,
    CD

    Tell us about your design.

    I recall a water detector made from a clothespin and an aspirin and a
    couple of pieces of wire.

    But it doesn't take much current to turn on a mosfet.

    True, and that's what my design relies on. I say "design" but that's over-dignifying it. I doubt there's more than 10 components to it all
    told - tops! Still, the most important thing is it works.
    How did the pin/aspirin desgin work??


    https://ademu.home.xs4all.nl/download/Waterdetector%20without%20headache.jpg

    Arie

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jeff Layman@21:1/5 to Cursitor Doom on Fri Dec 27 08:38:27 2024
    On 26/12/2024 19:29, Cursitor Doom wrote:
    Gentlemen,

    I'm currently in the process of building a device which will shut off
    the power to a washing machine in the event of a hose failing and
    spewing water out all over the floor. This is an eventuality which has
    always caused me considerable angst, so I finally decided to do
    something about it. After all, those flimsy 'exhaust' hoses go brittle
    over time and having one split 'in action' could cause a significant
    amount of damage to the surrounding area in a very short time. Having something to cut the power off instantly as soon as the water hits the
    floor would be a very worthwhile addition to the utility room and
    beyond.

    Why only cut off the power? Surely the important thing to do is cut off
    the water supply. Something like this should do it: <https://www.amazon.co.uk/VYAIR-AS-416BR-Electronic-Leak-Detector/dp/B0CGXSS7VS?th=1>

    That would also serve in the (admittedly rare) situation where the water
    supply tubing to the washing machine fails.

    --
    Jeff

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Cursitor Doom@21:1/5 to All on Fri Dec 27 11:12:19 2024
    On Fri, 27 Dec 2024 08:30:05 +0100, Arie de Muijnck <noreply@ademu.nl>
    wrote:

    On 2024-12-27 02:21, Cursitor Doom wrote:
    On Thu, 26 Dec 2024 15:09:38 -0800, john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com>
    wrote:

    On Thu, 26 Dec 2024 19:29:11 +0000, Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com>
    wrote:

    Gentlemen,

    I'm currently in the process of building a device which will shut off
    the power to a washing machine in the event of a hose failing and
    spewing water out all over the floor. This is an eventuality which has >>>> always caused me considerable angst, so I finally decided to do
    something about it. After all, those flimsy 'exhaust' hoses go brittle >>>> over time and having one split 'in action' could cause a significant
    amount of damage to the surrounding area in a very short time. Having
    something to cut the power off instantly as soon as the water hits the >>>> floor would be a very worthwhile addition to the utility room and
    beyond.
    I came up with a pretty simple design which I've already proven to
    work first time at the breadboarding stage. However, turning this
    concept into a practical proposition is taking *far* longer than I'd
    imagined. I am getting there, but *slowly* and was wondering whether
    other people here have the same sort of problem as I invariably do
    with these little personal projects they undertake?

    Your hydrophobic pal,
    CD

    Tell us about your design.

    I recall a water detector made from a clothespin and an aspirin and a
    couple of pieces of wire.

    But it doesn't take much current to turn on a mosfet.

    True, and that's what my design relies on. I say "design" but that's
    over-dignifying it. I doubt there's more than 10 components to it all
    told - tops! Still, the most important thing is it works.
    How did the pin/aspirin desgin work??


    https://ademu.home.xs4all.nl/download/Waterdetector%20without%20headache.jpg

    Arie

    Ingenious!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Cursitor Doom@21:1/5 to All on Fri Dec 27 18:02:45 2024
    On Fri, 27 Dec 2024 11:12:19 +0000, Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com>
    wrote:

    On Fri, 27 Dec 2024 08:30:05 +0100, Arie de Muijnck <noreply@ademu.nl>
    wrote:

    On 2024-12-27 02:21, Cursitor Doom wrote:
    On Thu, 26 Dec 2024 15:09:38 -0800, john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com>
    wrote:

    On Thu, 26 Dec 2024 19:29:11 +0000, Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com>
    wrote:

    Gentlemen,

    I'm currently in the process of building a device which will shut off >>>>> the power to a washing machine in the event of a hose failing and
    spewing water out all over the floor. This is an eventuality which has >>>>> always caused me considerable angst, so I finally decided to do
    something about it. After all, those flimsy 'exhaust' hoses go brittle >>>>> over time and having one split 'in action' could cause a significant >>>>> amount of damage to the surrounding area in a very short time. Having >>>>> something to cut the power off instantly as soon as the water hits the >>>>> floor would be a very worthwhile addition to the utility room and
    beyond.
    I came up with a pretty simple design which I've already proven to
    work first time at the breadboarding stage. However, turning this
    concept into a practical proposition is taking *far* longer than I'd >>>>> imagined. I am getting there, but *slowly* and was wondering whether >>>>> other people here have the same sort of problem as I invariably do
    with these little personal projects they undertake?

    Your hydrophobic pal,
    CD

    Tell us about your design.

    I recall a water detector made from a clothespin and an aspirin and a
    couple of pieces of wire.

    But it doesn't take much current to turn on a mosfet.

    True, and that's what my design relies on. I say "design" but that's
    over-dignifying it. I doubt there's more than 10 components to it all
    told - tops! Still, the most important thing is it works.
    How did the pin/aspirin desgin work??

    https://ademu.home.xs4all.nl/download/Waterdetector%20without%20headache.jpg >>
    Arie

    Ingenious!

    Just for a bit of fun (which I don't get much of at my age) I thought
    I'd replicate the idea to see how effective it is. My first attempt
    didn't work out at all, as the clothes peg compressed the (soluable)
    aspirin as it became saturated and prevented it dissolving
    sufficiently for the gap to close. I was left with about a tenth of an
    inch between contacts.so FAIL!
    For this to stand any chance of working, you'd have to fashion the
    contacts so they have pointy ends. That should work, BUT if it were
    used in my applcation, several dozen gallons of water would be all
    over the floor before it would be able to close-up. My design, OTOH,
    shuts off the electric in about 25 femto-seconds. :-)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Don@21:1/5 to Bill Sloman on Fri Dec 27 19:04:45 2024
    Bill Sloman wrote:
    Cursitor Doom wrote:
    Gentlemen,

    I'm currently in the process of building a device which will shut off
    the power to a washing machine in the event of a hose failing and
    spewing water out all over the floor. This is an eventuality which has
    always caused me considerable angst, so I finally decided to do
    something about it. After all, those flimsy 'exhaust' hoses go brittle
    over time and having one split 'in action' could cause a significant
    amount of damage to the surrounding area in a very short time. Having
    something to cut the power off instantly as soon as the water hits the
    floor would be a very worthwhile addition to the utility room and
    beyond.
    I came up with a pretty simple design which I've already proven to
    work first time at the breadboarding stage. However, turning this
    concept into a practical proposition is taking *far* longer than I'd
    imagined. I am getting there, but *slowly* and was wondering whether
    other people here have the same sort of problem as I invariably do
    with these little personal projects they undertake?

    Your hydrophobic pal,

    The last time my hot-water tank pin-holed through and spread water all
    over the floor, the plumber that replaced the tank put a shallow water-catching tray underneath the new tank and put a battery-operated
    stop valve into the cold water feed. The stop valve can with a water
    sensor that sat in the tray, and turns off the cold water feed if there
    water in the tray.

    It's one more thing that screams at me when it's batteries get close to running out, but that's less of a pain than a lot of water wrecking the carpet, or the parquet that replaced it.

    Talk to your local plumbing supplier - it's madness to waste time on
    design when you can buy something off the shelf.

    Madness in Art: A Powerful Connection

    Madness and art have long shared a profound and powerful
    connection, where the boundaries between genius and
    instability often blur. ...

    <https://www.dailyartmagazine.com/madness-in-art/>

    The art of элСктроника: why not create a DIY water alarm with the venerable 555?

    <https://www.codrey.com/electronic-circuits/simple-steam-sensor-build-ahs01ib-absolute-humidity-sensor/>

    Electrolysis can cause the DC sensor to degrade over time. An analog
    adaptation from resistance to capacitance can curb this effect. The
    above sensor needs to be altered to detect a dielectric difference
    instead of an ohmic resistance.

    Danke,

    --
    Don, KB7RPU, https://www.qsl.net/kb7rpu
    There was a young lady named Bright Whose speed was far faster than light;
    She set out one day In a relative way And returned on the previous night.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From ehsjr@21:1/5 to Cursitor Doom on Fri Dec 27 14:46:19 2024
    On 12/27/2024 1:02 PM, Cursitor Doom wrote:
    On Fri, 27 Dec 2024 11:12:19 +0000, Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com>
    wrote:

    On Fri, 27 Dec 2024 08:30:05 +0100, Arie de Muijnck <noreply@ademu.nl>
    wrote:

    On 2024-12-27 02:21, Cursitor Doom wrote:
    On Thu, 26 Dec 2024 15:09:38 -0800, john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com>
    wrote:

    On Thu, 26 Dec 2024 19:29:11 +0000, Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com> >>>>> wrote:

    Gentlemen,

    I'm currently in the process of building a device which will shut off >>>>>> the power to a washing machine in the event of a hose failing and
    spewing water out all over the floor. This is an eventuality which has >>>>>> always caused me considerable angst, so I finally decided to do
    something about it. After all, those flimsy 'exhaust' hoses go brittle >>>>>> over time and having one split 'in action' could cause a significant >>>>>> amount of damage to the surrounding area in a very short time. Having >>>>>> something to cut the power off instantly as soon as the water hits the >>>>>> floor would be a very worthwhile addition to the utility room and
    beyond.
    I came up with a pretty simple design which I've already proven to >>>>>> work first time at the breadboarding stage. However, turning this
    concept into a practical proposition is taking *far* longer than I'd >>>>>> imagined. I am getting there, but *slowly* and was wondering whether >>>>>> other people here have the same sort of problem as I invariably do >>>>>> with these little personal projects they undertake?

    Your hydrophobic pal,
    CD

    Tell us about your design.

    I recall a water detector made from a clothespin and an aspirin and a >>>>> couple of pieces of wire.

    But it doesn't take much current to turn on a mosfet.

    True, and that's what my design relies on. I say "design" but that's
    over-dignifying it. I doubt there's more than 10 components to it all
    told - tops! Still, the most important thing is it works.
    How did the pin/aspirin desgin work??


    https://ademu.home.xs4all.nl/download/Waterdetector%20without%20headache.jpg

    Arie

    Ingenious!

    Just for a bit of fun (which I don't get much of at my age) I thought
    I'd replicate the idea to see how effective it is. My first attempt
    didn't work out at all, as the clothes peg compressed the (soluable)
    aspirin as it became saturated and prevented it dissolving
    sufficiently for the gap to close. I was left with about a tenth of an
    inch between contacts.so FAIL!

    The sensor I made is simple and reliable.
    Etch a board with two "combs" where the
    tines of the combs interlace, like this:

    +-+-+-+----o
    | | | |
    ||||||||
    | | | |
    +-+-+-+---o

    When water drips onto the sensor, the open circuit between
    top and bottom "combs" goes to a resistance, in my case below
    100K and sufficient to drive an NPN and operate a relay.

    Ed

    For this to stand any chance of working, you'd have to fashion the
    contacts so they have pointy ends. That should work, BUT if it were
    used in my applcation, several dozen gallons of water would be all
    over the floor before it would be able to close-up. My design, OTOH,
    shuts off the electric in about 25 femto-seconds. :-)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Liz Tuddenham@21:1/5 to Cursitor Doom on Fri Dec 27 21:37:44 2024
    Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com> wrote:

    On Fri, 27 Dec 2024 11:12:19 +0000, Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com>
    wrote:

    On Fri, 27 Dec 2024 08:30:05 +0100, Arie de Muijnck <noreply@ademu.nl> >wrote:

    On 2024-12-27 02:21, Cursitor Doom wrote:
    On Thu, 26 Dec 2024 15:09:38 -0800, john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com>
    wrote:

    On Thu, 26 Dec 2024 19:29:11 +0000, Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com> >>>> wrote:

    Gentlemen,

    I'm currently in the process of building a device which will shut off >>>>> the power to a washing machine in the event of a hose failing and
    spewing water out all over the floor. This is an eventuality which has >>>>> always caused me considerable angst, so I finally decided to do
    something about it. After all, those flimsy 'exhaust' hoses go brittle >>>>> over time and having one split 'in action' could cause a significant >>>>> amount of damage to the surrounding area in a very short time. Having >>>>> something to cut the power off instantly as soon as the water hits the >>>>> floor would be a very worthwhile addition to the utility room and
    beyond.
    I came up with a pretty simple design which I've already proven to >>>>> work first time at the breadboarding stage. However, turning this
    concept into a practical proposition is taking *far* longer than I'd >>>>> imagined. I am getting there, but *slowly* and was wondering whether >>>>> other people here have the same sort of problem as I invariably do >>>>> with these little personal projects they undertake?

    Your hydrophobic pal,
    CD

    Tell us about your design.

    I recall a water detector made from a clothespin and an aspirin and a >>>> couple of pieces of wire.

    But it doesn't take much current to turn on a mosfet.

    True, and that's what my design relies on. I say "design" but that's
    over-dignifying it. I doubt there's more than 10 components to it all
    told - tops! Still, the most important thing is it works.
    How did the pin/aspirin desgin work??

    https://ademu.home.xs4all.nl/download/Waterdetector%20without%20headache.jpg

    Arie

    Ingenious!

    Just for a bit of fun (which I don't get much of at my age) I thought
    I'd replicate the idea to see how effective it is. My first attempt
    didn't work out at all, as the clothes peg compressed the (soluable)
    aspirin as it became saturated and prevented it dissolving
    sufficiently for the gap to close. I was left with about a tenth of an
    inch between contacts.so FAIL!

    Asprin tablets contain a large amount of compressed chalk, which doesn't dissolve. You need to find something that dissolves completely like a
    sugary sweet or even a sugar cube. During WWII, indigestion tablets
    were used to delay the release of floating mines from a river bed, but
    they also contain chalk and wouldn't work in the 'clothespeg' device..

    Dishwasher salt tablets would work but may become too conductive if the
    local humidity was high - they would also corrode the electrodes. I was
    in some very damp rented accommodation once and I accidentally spilled
    some salt on the kitchen worktop one evening; when I looked the next
    morning it had turned into a salty puddle.

    --
    ~ Liz Tuddenham ~
    (Remove the ".invalid"s and add ".co.uk" to reply)
    www.poppyrecords.co.uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Liz Tuddenham@21:1/5 to Don on Fri Dec 27 21:37:44 2024
    Don <g@crcomp.net> wrote:


    Electrolysis can cause the DC sensor to degrade over time. An analog adaptation from resistance to capacitance can curb this effect. The
    above sensor needs to be altered to detect a dielectric difference
    instead of an ohmic resistance.

    Perhaps spme sort of adaptation of my conductivity meter circuit would
    do the job:
    <http://www.poppyrecords.co.uk/other/ConductivityMeter14.gif>

    It generates floating AC with prevents electrolysis at the sensor and
    uses synchronous rectification to eliminate spurious responses. For simplicity, the range switch could be replaced by a pot and the meter
    drivers arranged to switch a relay.

    --
    ~ Liz Tuddenham ~
    (Remove the ".invalid"s and add ".co.uk" to reply)
    www.poppyrecords.co.uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Cursitor Doom@21:1/5 to Liz Tuddenham on Sat Dec 28 00:32:04 2024
    On Fri, 27 Dec 2024 21:37:44 +0000, liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid
    (Liz Tuddenham) wrote:

    Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com> wrote:

    On Fri, 27 Dec 2024 11:12:19 +0000, Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com>
    wrote:

    On Fri, 27 Dec 2024 08:30:05 +0100, Arie de Muijnck <noreply@ademu.nl>
    wrote:

    On 2024-12-27 02:21, Cursitor Doom wrote:
    On Thu, 26 Dec 2024 15:09:38 -0800, john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com>
    wrote:

    On Thu, 26 Dec 2024 19:29:11 +0000, Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com> >> >>>> wrote:

    Gentlemen,

    I'm currently in the process of building a device which will shut off >> >>>>> the power to a washing machine in the event of a hose failing and
    spewing water out all over the floor. This is an eventuality which has >> >>>>> always caused me considerable angst, so I finally decided to do
    something about it. After all, those flimsy 'exhaust' hoses go brittle >> >>>>> over time and having one split 'in action' could cause a significant >> >>>>> amount of damage to the surrounding area in a very short time. Having >> >>>>> something to cut the power off instantly as soon as the water hits the >> >>>>> floor would be a very worthwhile addition to the utility room and
    beyond.
    I came up with a pretty simple design which I've already proven to
    work first time at the breadboarding stage. However, turning this
    concept into a practical proposition is taking *far* longer than I'd >> >>>>> imagined. I am getting there, but *slowly* and was wondering whether >> >>>>> other people here have the same sort of problem as I invariably do
    with these little personal projects they undertake?

    Your hydrophobic pal,
    CD

    Tell us about your design.

    I recall a water detector made from a clothespin and an aspirin and a >> >>>> couple of pieces of wire.

    But it doesn't take much current to turn on a mosfet.

    True, and that's what my design relies on. I say "design" but that's
    over-dignifying it. I doubt there's more than 10 components to it all
    told - tops! Still, the most important thing is it works.
    How did the pin/aspirin desgin work??


    https://ademu.home.xs4all.nl/download/Waterdetector%20without%20headache.jpg

    Arie

    Ingenious!

    Just for a bit of fun (which I don't get much of at my age) I thought
    I'd replicate the idea to see how effective it is. My first attempt
    didn't work out at all, as the clothes peg compressed the (soluable)
    aspirin as it became saturated and prevented it dissolving
    sufficiently for the gap to close. I was left with about a tenth of an
    inch between contacts.so FAIL!

    Asprin tablets contain a large amount of compressed chalk, which doesn't >dissolve. You need to find something that dissolves completely like a
    sugary sweet or even a sugar cube. During WWII, indigestion tablets
    were used to delay the release of floating mines from a river bed, but
    they also contain chalk and wouldn't work in the 'clothespeg' device..

    Dishwasher salt tablets would work but may become too conductive if the
    local humidity was high - they would also corrode the electrodes. I was
    in some very damp rented accommodation once and I accidentally spilled
    some salt on the kitchen worktop one evening; when I looked the next
    morning it had turned into a salty puddle.

    Yes, salt is massively hygroscopic, giving it another attack vector
    against steel-bodied cars even if it hasn't been raining. I believe
    it doesn't agree at all well with slugs, either!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)