• 'Expert' Predicts ALL Human-Staffed Bank Branches Will Close by 2041

    From 186283@ud0s4.net@21:1/5 to All on Sun Sep 22 22:50:51 2024
    XPost: talk.politics.misc, alt.politics.usa, alt.business

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/yourmoney/bank-closures/article-13864947/Experts-reveal-date-bank-branch-shut-worrying-closure-trend-accelerates.html

    The last physical bank branch could close in a matter of years,
    new research has revealed.

    The last bricks-and-mortar bank could close as early as 2041,
    according to a new report from Self Financial.

    This date has been reached by studying the rate of net closures
    across the country, which has averaged 1,646 each year since 2018.

    Dailymail.com has reported on the alarming rate of closures,
    revealing the locations of weekly closures reported to the
    Office of the Comptroller of the Currency.

    . . .

    First off, human-service will be the rise of
    entirely NEW banks- their #1 selling point.
    Sorry, but AI/apps just WON'T DO THE TRICK even
    20 years from now - they don't "get" it, can't
    grasp all the human nuances, WILL steer everybody
    into a few bank-favorable 'plans' that'll rip
    you off and make life hell. If I'm gonna keep
    lots of money somewhere it will be where there
    ARE handy humans to deal with.

    Second, I don't think the recent wave of closures
    means what Mr. Expert thinks it does. Like with
    drugstores and burger joints, for a long time if
    the competition built one you made a point to
    open one of your own right across the street.

    Thing is, there often wasn't enough biz to really
    justify/sustain all those branches - it was all
    about facing-off "Them".

    Thirdly, there IS some kind of recession taking
    shape. The US finance picture is as bad as it
    was since the dot.com and real-estate crashes
    of (not so many) years past. Individual debts
    are unsustainable - meaning mass DEFAULTS Even
    Trump can't fix it - and Harris would make
    much worse. This is coming pretty soon now.

    The banks, though not logical enough to manage
    loans/etc properly, ARE smart enough to minimize
    their physical exposure here. Fewer branches = money
    saved (to a POINT).

    There ARE some people positioned to profit whether
    there's great advance OR great crashes. They seem
    to have considerable influence over banking. After
    every crash our 'leaders' PRETEND to fix that, but
    their 'donors' make sure there are plenty of
    loop-holes in their new regs. This is a systemic
    flaw of 'democracy', 'influence', and the only
    cures are even worse than the disease. It's all
    very Machiavellian under the glossy paint and
    ad jingles.

    (It's impressive really ... old Nick had it all
    pegged-down CENTURIES ago - and the only thing
    that's changed is that the REAL 'leaders' got
    even better at hiding their hand)

    (suggest Machiavelli's "Discourses" where he
    actually EXPLAINS the whats and whys of
    things found in 'Prince' and such. there's
    a lot you will immediately recognize. why
    do execs get 'golden parachutes' ? read it
    and you'll know why)

    Oh, it's not JUST the USA having a sort of
    financial implosion ... pretty much all
    the 'west' is just as fucked up. Just
    yesterday even France finally admitted
    that's it's in dire straits. The Germans
    are kinda hiding it, but they're in a
    pretty bad position too.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)