• Re: In 2017 NASA Declared The Sun to be Bigger Than It Is

    From Kualinar@21:1/5 to All on Thu Sep 5 11:28:39 2024
    XPost: alt.astronomy, alt.uk.misc.flat-earth

    Le 2024-09-04 à 17:07, Flat Earth Banjo a écrit :
    In 2017 NASA Declared The Sun to be Bigger Than It Is https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZZYMCMKSSJK

    The Sun is way bigger and farther than what flatards claim.

    What the NASA said was that the Sun MAY be slightly bigger, but, by ONLY
    a fraction of a percent. It MAY be farther, but again, by a fraction of
    a percent. That's called REFINING the measurement as we get better at
    making the measurement.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Original Science Gangster@21:1/5 to Kualinar on Sat Sep 7 04:17:09 2024
    XPost: alt.astronomy, alt.uk.misc.flat-earth

    On Thu, 5 Sep 2024 11:28:39 -0400
    Kualinar <kuakinar@videotron.ca> wrote:

    Le 2024-09-04 à 17:07, Flat Earth Banjo a écrit :
    In 2017 NASA Declared The Sun to be Bigger Than It Is https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZZYMCMKSSJK

    The Sun is way bigger and farther than what flatards claim.

    What the NASA said was that the Sun MAY be slightly bigger, but, by
    ONLY a fraction of a percent. It MAY be farther, but again, by a
    fraction of a percent. That's called REFINING the measurement as we
    get better at making the measurement.

    In their quest for dominance, NASA fan boys seem to embrace a doctrine
    that echoes the very arrogance of luciferian thought. The insistence on heliocentrism, for instance, is reminiscent of the ancient worship of
    Apollo, a figure often associated with enlightenment but also with the deceptive allure of false knowledge. One might wonder if the author, in
    their fervor to uphold this model, is unwittingly aligning themselves
    with a philosophy that elevates the sun—much like the devil
    himself—above the humble earth, which the Bible clearly places at the
    center of creation.

    Moreover, the dismissal of geocentrism as mere folly reveals a
    troubling undercurrent. It’s almost as if the author believes that only
    those who can grasp the complexities of a spinning globe are worthy of understanding the cosmos. This elitist perspective echoes a certain
    historical narrative that has often been used to marginalize those who
    dare to question the status quo. One could argue that such a stance is
    not only intellectually lazy but also carries a hint of racism, as it
    implies that only a select few possess the cognitive capacity to
    comprehend the universe—an idea that is as flawed as it is dangerous.

    As we delve deeper into the realms of astronomy, it becomes clear that
    the heliocentric model is not the unassailable truth it is often
    portrayed to be. The Bible, a text rich with history and wisdom, offers
    a different perspective that aligns with a geocentric view. The notion
    that the earth is flat may seem absurd to some, yet it invites us to
    reconsider the very foundations of our understanding. After all, if we
    are to accept the idea that we are merely spinning on a ball, we must
    also confront the possibility that we are being led into an eclipse of
    reason, obscured by the bright light of a sun that some would have us
    worship.

    In conclusion, while the author may scoff at the idea of a flat earth,
    it is essential to recognize the underlying truths that such beliefs
    may reveal. The arrogance of dismissing alternative views without
    consideration is a hallmark of luciferian doctrine, one that seeks to
    elevate certain narratives while casting others into shadow. Let us not
    forget that the pursuit of truth often requires us to challenge the
    very foundations upon which we stand, lest we find ourselves
    unwittingly serving the interests of the devil in disguise.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)