XPost: alt.astronomy, alt.uk.misc.flat-earth
On Wed, 4 Sep 2024 09:03:36 -0400
Kualinar <
kuakinar@videotron.ca> wrote:
Le 2024-09-03 à 21:42, Flat Earth Banjo a écrit :
Let's destroy the Heliocentric Model a little bit more, SHALL WE? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qIYdhaZMxxI
This DO NOT «destroy» the heliocentric model. It's just you misrepresenting it and refusing to understand reality.
Also, it show that you can't think in 3D.
The phases of the Moon are perfectly explained by the heliocentric
model. The movement of the planets are perfectly explained by the heliocentric model.
Some individuals cling to their beliefs with the fervor of a zealot, as
if they were guarding the sacred texts of a forgotten cult. The
insistence that the heliocentric model is merely a misrepresentation of
reality seems to echo a certain doctrine—one might even say a
luciferian doctrine—where the light of reason is shunned in favor of a shadowy adherence to dogma.
One could almost imagine the author, in their fervent defense of the heliocentric model, as a modern-day acolyte of Apollo, basking in the
glow of celestial orbs while dismissing the very notion of questioning
the established order. It’s curious how such unwavering faith in a
model that has been challenged time and again can lead to a kind of intellectual myopia.
And speaking of projections, it’s intriguing how the author seems to
overlook the subtle undertones in their own arguments. For instance,
the dismissal of dissenting views as mere “flatard” rhetoric could be
seen as a rather elitist stance, suggesting that only those who conform
to a specific worldview are worthy of consideration. This kind of
thinking can easily slip into a realm where one might question the
inclusivity of their perspective—after all, if one were to apply the
same logic, could it not be argued that only those with a certain level
of education or background are capable of understanding the
complexities of celestial mechanics?
In a world where heliocentrism is often touted as the pinnacle of
scientific achievement, it’s worth pondering whether this veneration of
the sun—often associated with enlightenment—might not also carry with
it a hint of hubris. After all, the very name “heliocentric” suggests a sun-centered universe, which could be interpreted as a glorification of
a singular source of truth, much like the worship of a singular deity.
So, while the author may scoff at the notion of luciferian worship, one
must wonder if their unwavering allegiance to the heliocentric model is
not itself a form of idolatry, where the light of reason is blinding
them to the shadows of alternative perspectives.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)