• Re: 1991 ranger brake problem

    From Bob La Londe@21:1/5 to Jim Wilkins on Mon Nov 11 15:04:41 2024
    On 11/11/2024 2:42 PM, Jim Wilkins wrote:
    "Jim Wilkins"  wrote in message news:vgrgle$k6r1$1@dont-email.me...
    It's fine now, just needed an operator headspace adjustment.

    You say you re-torqued the nut behind the wheel?


    --
    Bob La Londe
    CNC Molds N Stuff

    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software.
    www.avg.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bob La Londe@21:1/5 to Jim Wilkins on Mon Nov 11 16:29:36 2024
    On 11/11/2024 4:06 PM, Jim Wilkins wrote:
    "Bob La Londe"  wrote in message news:vgtv1p$16ml6$1@dont-email.me...

    On 11/11/2024 2:42 PM, Jim Wilkins wrote:
    "Jim Wilkins"  wrote in message news:vgrgle$k6r1$1@dont-email.me...
    It's fine now, just needed an operator headspace adjustment.

    You say you re-torqued the nut behind the wheel?
    Bob La Londe

    ----------------------------

    The good part is while looking for the problem I checked conditions and cleaned up and sprayed
    overlooked corrosion. Both of my vehicles are becoming old enough to
    attract the attention of car buffs. Both have drivetrains reputed to
    last 300,000 miles but New England road salt rust usually kills well
    before that.

    PB Blaster unstuck the light alloy master cylinder from the steel vacuum booster. The factory shop manual gives plans to machine a gauge to check
    or set booster pushrod protrusion, if you have a machine shop handy. I
    do but instead of milling the gauge I used a parallel. That isn't the
    only special tool they expect you to make. I snagged the engine tool kit
    at an auction.

    A neighbor is restoring a 71 Chevy from worse condition than my truck.



    I'll tell you after my last truck buying experience I would be very
    tempted to buy an old truck and restore it if I had the time. I think
    the 1982 Bronco might be my last such project. I'd be tempted to do
    something with the '42 Willys, but I'll probably let it go to somebody
    with a passion for it.

    Interestingly the 42 Willys has virtually no rust, while the Bronco
    needs some body work.







    --
    Bob La Londe
    CNC Molds N Stuff

    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software.
    www.avg.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Clare Snyder@21:1/5 to All on Mon Nov 11 20:32:11 2024
    On Mon, 11 Nov 2024 16:29:36 -0700, Bob La Londe <none@none.com99>
    wrote:

    On 11/11/2024 4:06 PM, Jim Wilkins wrote:
    "Bob La Londe"á wrote in message news:vgtv1p$16ml6$1@dont-email.me...

    On 11/11/2024 2:42 PM, Jim Wilkins wrote:
    "Jim Wilkins"á wrote in message news:vgrgle$k6r1$1@dont-email.me...
    It's fine now, just needed an operator headspace adjustment.

    You say you re-torqued the nut behind the wheel?
    Bob La Londe

    ----------------------------

    The good part is while looking for the problem I checked conditions and
    cleaned up and sprayed
    overlooked corrosion. Both of my vehicles are becoming old enough to
    attract the attention of car buffs. Both have drivetrains reputed to
    last 300,000 miles but New England road salt rust usually kills well
    before that.

    PB Blaster unstuck the light alloy master cylinder from the steel vacuum
    booster. The factory shop manual gives plans to machine a gauge to check
    or set booster pushrod protrusion, if you have a machine shop handy. I
    do but instead of milling the gauge I used a parallel. That isn't the
    only special tool they expect you to make. I snagged the engine tool kit
    at an auction.

    A neighbor is restoring a 71 Chevy from worse condition than my truck.



    I'll tell you after my last truck buying experience I would be very
    tempted to buy an old truck and restore it if I had the time. I think
    the 1982 Bronco might be my last such project. I'd be tempted to do >something with the '42 Willys, but I'll probably let it go to somebody
    with a passion for it.

    Interestingly the 42 Willys has virtually no rust, while the Bronco
    needs some body work.



    I picked up a pair of front fenders for my '96 Ranger longbed. Likely
    paint them and put them on next summer. I need to do a bit of rust
    repair above the windsheild and repaint the roof as well.
    About 392000 on the clock. 4 liter 5 speed XL 3.55 posi




    --
    Bob La Londe
    CNC Molds N Stuff

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Clare Snyder@21:1/5 to All on Mon Nov 11 22:34:34 2024
    On Mon, 11 Nov 2024 16:29:36 -0700, Bob La Londe <none@none.com99>
    wrote:

    On 11/11/2024 4:06 PM, Jim Wilkins wrote:
    "Bob La Londe"á wrote in message news:vgtv1p$16ml6$1@dont-email.me...

    On 11/11/2024 2:42 PM, Jim Wilkins wrote:
    "Jim Wilkins"á wrote in message news:vgrgle$k6r1$1@dont-email.me...
    It's fine now, just needed an operator headspace adjustment.

    You say you re-torqued the nut behind the wheel?
    Bob La Londe

    ----------------------------

    The good part is while looking for the problem I checked conditions and
    cleaned up and sprayed
    overlooked corrosion. Both of my vehicles are becoming old enough to
    attract the attention of car buffs. Both have drivetrains reputed to
    last 300,000 miles but New England road salt rust usually kills well
    before that.

    PB Blaster unstuck the light alloy master cylinder from the steel vacuum
    booster. The factory shop manual gives plans to machine a gauge to check
    or set booster pushrod protrusion, if you have a machine shop handy. I
    do but instead of milling the gauge I used a parallel. That isn't the
    only special tool they expect you to make. I snagged the engine tool kit
    at an auction.

    A neighbor is restoring a 71 Chevy from worse condition than my truck.



    I'll tell you after my last truck buying experience I would be very
    tempted to buy an old truck and restore it if I had the time. I think
    the 1982 Bronco might be my last such project. I'd be tempted to do >something with the '42 Willys, but I'll probably let it go to somebody
    with a passion for it.

    Interestingly the 42 Willys has virtually no rust, while the Bronco
    needs some body work.





    t

    toobad that willys is so far away!!

    --
    Bob La Londe
    CNC Molds N Stuff

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bob La Londe@21:1/5 to Jim Wilkins on Tue Nov 12 14:02:49 2024
    On 11/11/2024 8:51 PM, Jim Wilkins wrote:
    "Clare Snyder"  wrote in message news:d5j5jjh9l75v95jofkrde2b2r8o7lr2bfr@4ax.com...

    toobad that willys is so far away!!

    --
    Bob La Londe
    CNC Molds N Stuff
    --------------------------------------
    The M151 Jeeps we had in Germany were not good on the roads there. They couldn't keep up on the Autobahn and the winding back roads that BMWs
    were built for tempted drivers to exceed their cornering limits. My VW
    could easily handle the unpaved forest fire trails where we set up field exercise sites.


    When my dad first got that old Willys ready to go for a first off road adventure we headed off across the sand dunes. I thought it was going
    just fine, but he said he didn't feel like it was performing properly.
    When we got back to the store and pulled around to the back to the shop
    he hopped out to take a look. Then he realized he hadn't engaged the
    hubs. LOL.

    Probably, its biggest real world use for us was tracking people lost in
    the desert. Now I can track (to a limited extent) looking at the window
    of my truck, but I've always been better able to track on the ground.
    Back then I hadn't really learned to track. Not well anyway. We'd put
    that old GPV in first gear and hop out. As long as the terrain wasn't extremely off camber or a crazy grade it would easily keep going in the direction it was last pointed. We could spread out, cut sign, walk back
    to the Jeep for lunch or a drink of water, or to change course as
    needed. Seems like a little thing but it made a several hour to all day
    rescue tolerable.

    The short wheel base and front and rear end clearance was fantastic for crossing all but the worst washouts, and it would climb some pretty
    incredible grades just idling along with somebody at the wheel. Sand
    was not even an issue.

    High speed cornering? Um-no. Lots of high clearance vehicles struggle
    with that. Even some you might not think. Flat out on the Autobahn?
    You are kidding right? How much do you expect out of a flat head four?
    Were you guys raiding the clinic and feeding it nitrous? Even then...
    Um-no. LOL

    FYI: That old '42 had a top speed in the high 50s. Maybe low 60s (but
    I doubt it), but its got a torque ratio at idle that's insane. Its a
    utility vehicle. By today's standards just a basic 4x4 side by side
    with a bed to haul some stuff.

    P.S. I should say I can track in the desert. Not so much in the woods.
    It depends.



    --
    Bob La Londe
    CNC Molds N Stuff

    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software.
    www.avg.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Snag@21:1/5 to Bob La Londe on Tue Nov 12 15:52:49 2024
    On 11/12/2024 3:02 PM, Bob La Londe wrote:
    On 11/11/2024 8:51 PM, Jim Wilkins wrote:
    "Clare Snyder"  wrote in message
    news:d5j5jjh9l75v95jofkrde2b2r8o7lr2bfr@4ax.com...

    toobad that willys is so far away!!

    --
    Bob La Londe
    CNC Molds N Stuff
    --------------------------------------
    The M151 Jeeps we had in Germany were not good on the roads there.
    They couldn't keep up on the Autobahn and the winding back roads that
    BMWs were built for tempted drivers to exceed their cornering limits.
    My VW could easily handle the unpaved forest fire trails where we set
    up field exercise sites.


    When my dad first got that old Willys ready to go for a first off road adventure we headed off across the sand dunes.  I thought it was going
    just fine, but he said he didn't feel like it was performing properly.
    When we got back to the store and pulled around to the back to the shop
    he hopped out to take a look.  Then he realized he hadn't engaged the hubs.  LOL.

    Probably, its biggest real world use for us was tracking people lost in
    the desert.  Now I can track (to a limited extent) looking at the window
    of my truck, but I've always been better able to track on the ground.
    Back then I hadn't really learned to track.  Not well anyway.  We'd put that old GPV in first gear and hop out.  As long as the terrain wasn't extremely off camber or a crazy grade it would easily keep going in the direction it was last pointed.  We could spread out, cut sign, walk back
    to the Jeep for lunch or a drink of water, or to change course as
    needed.  Seems like a little thing but it made a several hour to all day rescue tolerable.

    The short wheel base and front and rear end clearance was fantastic for crossing all but the worst washouts, and it would climb some pretty incredible grades just idling along with somebody at the wheel.  Sand
    was not even an issue.

    High speed cornering?  Um-no.  Lots of high clearance vehicles struggle with that.  Even some you might not think.  Flat out on the Autobahn?
    You are kidding right?  How much do you expect out of a flat head four?
    Were you guys raiding the clinic and feeding it nitrous?  Even then... Um-no.  LOL

    FYI:  That old '42 had a top speed in the high 50s.  Maybe low 60s (but
    I doubt it), but its got a torque ratio at idle that's insane.  Its a utility vehicle.  By today's standards just a basic 4x4 side by side
    with a bed to haul some stuff.

    P.S.  I should say I can track in the desert.  Not so much in the woods.
     It depends.




    Dad had a '57 Jeep pickup , he swapped out the original flathead six
    for a Tornado 230 overhead cam six . Weren't much for top end but it
    sure could climb ! Used to really piss of the guys with their hopped up
    big tire hot rod Chevy's and Fords . Dad would set the throttle at about 1500-1600 RPM and drop it in low/low/4 and just walk up the hills those
    boys just spun out on . My brother "gave it away to a friend" after Dad
    died .
    --
    Snag
    Voting for Kamabla after Biden
    is like changing your shirt because
    you shit your pants .

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bob La Londe@21:1/5 to Snag on Tue Nov 12 15:38:25 2024
    On 11/12/2024 2:52 PM, Snag wrote:
    On 11/12/2024 3:02 PM, Bob La Londe wrote:
    On 11/11/2024 8:51 PM, Jim Wilkins wrote:
    "Clare Snyder"  wrote in message
    news:d5j5jjh9l75v95jofkrde2b2r8o7lr2bfr@4ax.com...

    toobad that willys is so far away!!

    --
    Bob La Londe
    CNC Molds N Stuff
    --------------------------------------
    The M151 Jeeps we had in Germany were not good on the roads there.
    They couldn't keep up on the Autobahn and the winding back roads that
    BMWs were built for tempted drivers to exceed their cornering limits.
    My VW could easily handle the unpaved forest fire trails where we set
    up field exercise sites.


    When my dad first got that old Willys ready to go for a first off road
    adventure we headed off across the sand dunes.  I thought it was going
    just fine, but he said he didn't feel like it was performing properly.
    When we got back to the store and pulled around to the back to the
    shop he hopped out to take a look.  Then he realized he hadn't engaged
    the hubs.  LOL.

    Probably, its biggest real world use for us was tracking people lost
    in the desert.  Now I can track (to a limited extent) looking at the
    window of my truck, but I've always been better able to track on the
    ground. Back then I hadn't really learned to track.  Not well anyway.
    We'd put that old GPV in first gear and hop out.  As long as the
    terrain wasn't extremely off camber or a crazy grade it would easily
    keep going in the direction it was last pointed.  We could spread out,
    cut sign, walk back to the Jeep for lunch or a drink of water, or to
    change course as needed.  Seems like a little thing but it made a
    several hour to all day rescue tolerable.

    The short wheel base and front and rear end clearance was fantastic
    for crossing all but the worst washouts, and it would climb some
    pretty incredible grades just idling along with somebody at the
    wheel.  Sand was not even an issue.

    High speed cornering?  Um-no.  Lots of high clearance vehicles
    struggle with that.  Even some you might not think.  Flat out on the
    Autobahn? You are kidding right?  How much do you expect out of a flat
    head four? Were you guys raiding the clinic and feeding it nitrous?
    Even then... Um-no.  LOL

    FYI:  That old '42 had a top speed in the high 50s.  Maybe low 60s
    (but I doubt it), but its got a torque ratio at idle that's insane.
    Its a utility vehicle.  By today's standards just a basic 4x4 side by
    side with a bed to haul some stuff.

    P.S.  I should say I can track in the desert.  Not so much in the
    woods.   It depends.




     Dad had a '57 Jeep pickup , he swapped out the original flathead six
    for a Tornado 230 overhead cam six . Weren't much for top end but it
    sure could climb ! Used to really piss of the guys with their hopped up
    big tire hot rod Chevy's and Fords . Dad would set the throttle at about 1500-1600 RPM and drop it in low/low/4 and just walk up the hills those
    boys just spun out on . My brother "gave it away to a friend" after Dad
    died .

    Yeah, my dad was in love with that Jeep, but its been parked a long
    time. I am sure he would rather I fixed it backup again, but original
    parts are a lot harder to find than they were back in mid 70s, and the
    junk man my dad bought some of those early GOV parts from died a few
    years ago too. His son has been liquidating everything and just wants
    the land cleared. Any old GPV parts are long gone, and he's one of
    those guys that's impossible to get a price from, because every time you
    agree he changes the price.

    I might ask my son if he would like me to save it for him, but my son
    really has no connection with it.

    Now that Bronco... first time my dad refreshed that motor he installed
    what he called a 1/4 race cam. It loped and would jump like you kicked
    it with the spurs if you bumped the throttle just a little hard. Next
    time around he went with a much more sensible RV cam (long duration as
    opposed to high lift) that developed real world torque. If I bore and
    stroke it that's my goal. Sure it will develop more horsepower, but in
    the mid range where its actually useful off the track. LOL. Probably
    have to get rid of the Holley 650 and go with a throttle body to match
    the bigger volume.



    --
    Bob La Londe
    CNC Molds N Stuff

    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software.
    www.avg.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bob La Londe@21:1/5 to Jim Wilkins on Tue Nov 12 16:38:19 2024
    On 11/12/2024 4:02 PM, Jim Wilkins wrote:
    "Snag"  wrote in message news:vh0ini$1q13r$1@dont-email.me...

     Dad had a '57 Jeep pickup , he swapped out the original flathead six
    for a Tornado 230 overhead cam six . Weren't much for top end but it
    sure could climb ! Used to really piss of the guys with their hopped up
    big tire hot rod Chevy's and Fords . Dad would set the throttle at about 1500-1600 RPM and drop it in low/low/4 and just walk up the hills those
    boys just spun out on . My brother "gave it away to a friend" after Dad
    died .
    --
    Snag
    --------------------------------------

    When I was of that age for some reason Jeeps weren't common off-road in
    NH. VW dune buggies and older foreign cars were more popular with those
    who couldn't afford a Land Rover, pickups with many who could. Dirt
    bikes were the main choice before trikes and quads appeared, street-
    legal ones like mine could get themselves to / from distant trails,
    though I had to go around the most challenging obstacles. My buddy had a
    Land Rover which proved the adage that the better you have, the further
    in you get stuck. Usually I could get close enough to help dig out in my Beetle.

    A Bulgarian designer I have worked with perhaps said it best. "The more
    off road capable is your truck the further you must walk to find a
    tractor."



    In Germany I had a bicycle and an inflatable boat, either of which could carry me plus the other, and fences didn't block me. I could bicycle upstream, float down the river, then bicycle home. The grid of fire
    trails in forests let me go anywhere cross-country. Shell road maps were almost as detailed as topo maps and showed various ancient ruins to
    explore.




    --
    Bob La Londe
    CNC Molds N Stuff

    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software.
    www.avg.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Clare Snyder@21:1/5 to All on Tue Nov 12 20:40:19 2024
    On Tue, 12 Nov 2024 14:02:49 -0700, Bob La Londe <none@none.com99>
    wrote:

    On 11/11/2024 8:51 PM, Jim Wilkins wrote:
    "Clare Snyder"á wrote in message
    news:d5j5jjh9l75v95jofkrde2b2r8o7lr2bfr@4ax.com...

    toobad that willys is so far away!!

    --
    Bob La Londe
    CNC Molds N Stuff
    --------------------------------------
    The M151 Jeeps we had in Germany were not good on the roads there. They
    couldn't keep up on the Autobahn and the winding back roads that BMWs
    were built for tempted drivers to exceed their cornering limits. My VW
    could easily handle the unpaved forest fire trails where we set up field
    exercise sites.


    When my dad first got that old Willys ready to go for a first off road >adventure we headed off across the sand dunes. I thought it was going
    just fine, but he said he didn't feel like it was performing properly.
    When we got back to the store and pulled around to the back to the shop
    he hopped out to take a look. Then he realized he hadn't engaged the
    hubs. LOL.

    Probably, its biggest real world use for us was tracking people lost in
    the desert. Now I can track (to a limited extent) looking at the window
    of my truck, but I've always been better able to track on the ground.
    Back then I hadn't really learned to track. Not well anyway. We'd put
    that old GPV in first gear and hop out. As long as the terrain wasn't >extremely off camber or a crazy grade it would easily keep going in the >direction it was last pointed. We could spread out, cut sign, walk back
    to the Jeep for lunch or a drink of water, or to change course as
    needed. Seems like a little thing but it made a several hour to all day >rescue tolerable.

    The short wheel base and front and rear end clearance was fantastic for >crossing all but the worst washouts, and it would climb some pretty >incredible grades just idling along with somebody at the wheel. Sand
    was not even an issue.

    High speed cornering? Um-no. Lots of high clearance vehicles struggle
    with that. Even some you might not think. Flat out on the Autobahn?
    You are kidding right? How much do you expect out of a flat head four?
    Were you guys raiding the clinic and feeding it nitrous? Even then...
    Um-no. LOL

    FYI: That old '42 had a top speed in the high 50s. Maybe low 60s (but
    I doubt it), but its got a torque ratio at idle that's insane. Its a
    utility vehicle. By today's standards just a basic 4x4 side by side
    with a bed to haul some stuff.

    P.S. I should say I can track in the desert. Not so much in the woods.
    It depends.



    --
    Bob La Londe
    CNC Molds N Stuff
    I used to run an ex-military Dodge PowerWagon (1946?) as a tow truck.
    About 48MPH wide open downhill with a tailwind - slightly faster if
    you dropped it over a cliff

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Gerry@21:1/5 to All on Tue Nov 12 23:19:31 2024
    On Tue, 12 Nov 2024 14:02:49 -0700, Bob La Londe <none@none.com99>
    wrote:

    On 11/11/2024 8:51 PM, Jim Wilkins wrote:
    "Clare Snyder"á wrote in message
    news:d5j5jjh9l75v95jofkrde2b2r8o7lr2bfr@4ax.com...

    toobad that willys is so far away!!

    --
    Bob La Londe
    CNC Molds N Stuff
    --------------------------------------
    The M151 Jeeps we had in Germany were not good on the roads there. They
    couldn't keep up on the Autobahn and the winding back roads that BMWs
    were built for tempted drivers to exceed their cornering limits. My VW
    could easily handle the unpaved forest fire trails where we set up field
    exercise sites.


    When my dad first got that old Willys ready to go for a first off road >adventure we headed off across the sand dunes. I thought it was going
    just fine, but he said he didn't feel like it was performing properly.
    When we got back to the store and pulled around to the back to the shop
    he hopped out to take a look. Then he realized he hadn't engaged the
    hubs. LOL.

    Probably, its biggest real world use for us was tracking people lost in
    the desert. Now I can track (to a limited extent) looking at the window
    of my truck, but I've always been better able to track on the ground.
    Back then I hadn't really learned to track. Not well anyway. We'd put
    that old GPV in first gear and hop out. As long as the terrain wasn't >extremely off camber or a crazy grade it would easily keep going in the >direction it was last pointed. We could spread out, cut sign, walk back
    to the Jeep for lunch or a drink of water, or to change course as
    needed. Seems like a little thing but it made a several hour to all day >rescue tolerable.

    The short wheel base and front and rear end clearance was fantastic for >crossing all but the worst washouts, and it would climb some pretty >incredible grades just idling along with somebody at the wheel. Sand
    was not even an issue.

    High speed cornering? Um-no. Lots of high clearance vehicles struggle
    with that. Even some you might not think. Flat out on the Autobahn?
    You are kidding right? How much do you expect out of a flat head four?
    Were you guys raiding the clinic and feeding it nitrous? Even then...
    Um-no. LOL

    FYI: That old '42 had a top speed in the high 50s. Maybe low 60s (but
    I doubt it), but its got a torque ratio at idle that's insane. Its a
    utility vehicle. By today's standards just a basic 4x4 side by side
    with a bed to haul some stuff.

    P.S. I should say I can track in the desert. Not so much in the woods.
    It depends.



    --
    Bob La Londe
    CNC Molds N Stuff
    Around 1954-55, my older brother had a jeep flat bed 2wd truck, worst
    truck he ever owned - that thing would get stuck going down hill with
    a half inch of mud on the road. My Saturday job, if the temperatur was
    below zero F, was to make certain the two heat lamps under the hood
    were turned on so that it might start for him to go out somewhere that
    night

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Leon Fisk@21:1/5 to Jim Wilkins on Wed Nov 13 09:42:10 2024
    On Wed, 13 Nov 2024 08:02:45 -0500
    "Jim Wilkins" <muratlanne@gmail.com> wrote:

    <snip>
    My interest was exploring the back country, not tearing it up, the tread >lightly ethic, so unlike my buddy with the Land Rover I didn't have to climb >the steepest hills just to prove I could...

    Years ago I would explore Michigans western UP on vacations. My Chevy
    K10 wouldn't fit down most of the trails anymore because of its width.
    Trails were being kept open by quad-runners. Mountain bike worked well
    enough but something motorized would have been nice too. Liked the idea
    of a Rokon two-wheel drive motorcycle but nearly had heart failure
    when viewing the price. It's even doubled since I last looked😬 Still
    think it would work great. Could have carried it on rear of the truck
    using a hitch mount. Though can't fathom leaving it unattended anywhere
    with that kinda price tag...

    https://rokon.com/product/scout/

    --
    Leon Fisk
    Grand Rapids MI

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Leon Fisk@21:1/5 to Jim Wilkins on Wed Nov 13 11:30:42 2024
    On Wed, 13 Nov 2024 10:13:47 -0500
    "Jim Wilkins" <muratlanne@gmail.com> wrote:

    <snip>
    My Suzuki 185 would go almost anywhere...

    Had a Suzuki TS-250 as a teen with a bit worn 4.50 knobby on the back. Tried/did a lot of stupid stuff with it back then...

    I could blast through really mushy spots but if you slowed down for any
    reason you'd be stuck.

    With a Rokon you can walk along side and finesse them over unrideable
    terrain like logs and such which blocked areas I wanted to get to in
    the UP. I was never talented enough to do stuff like I've seen in Trials
    Comps with the Suzuki...

    --
    Leon Fisk
    Grand Rapids MI

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bob La Londe@21:1/5 to Gerry on Wed Nov 13 11:45:24 2024
    On 11/12/2024 9:19 PM, Gerry wrote:
    On Tue, 12 Nov 2024 14:02:49 -0700, Bob La Londe <none@none.com99>
    wrote:

    On 11/11/2024 8:51 PM, Jim Wilkins wrote:
    "Clare Snyder"  wrote in message
    news:d5j5jjh9l75v95jofkrde2b2r8o7lr2bfr@4ax.com...

    toobad that willys is so far away!!

    --
    Bob La Londe
    CNC Molds N Stuff
    --------------------------------------
    The M151 Jeeps we had in Germany were not good on the roads there. They
    couldn't keep up on the Autobahn and the winding back roads that BMWs
    were built for tempted drivers to exceed their cornering limits. My VW
    could easily handle the unpaved forest fire trails where we set up field >>> exercise sites.


    When my dad first got that old Willys ready to go for a first off road
    adventure we headed off across the sand dunes. I thought it was going
    just fine, but he said he didn't feel like it was performing properly.
    When we got back to the store and pulled around to the back to the shop
    he hopped out to take a look. Then he realized he hadn't engaged the
    hubs. LOL.

    Probably, its biggest real world use for us was tracking people lost in
    the desert. Now I can track (to a limited extent) looking at the window
    of my truck, but I've always been better able to track on the ground.
    Back then I hadn't really learned to track. Not well anyway. We'd put
    that old GPV in first gear and hop out. As long as the terrain wasn't
    extremely off camber or a crazy grade it would easily keep going in the
    direction it was last pointed. We could spread out, cut sign, walk back
    to the Jeep for lunch or a drink of water, or to change course as
    needed. Seems like a little thing but it made a several hour to all day
    rescue tolerable.

    The short wheel base and front and rear end clearance was fantastic for
    crossing all but the worst washouts, and it would climb some pretty
    incredible grades just idling along with somebody at the wheel. Sand
    was not even an issue.

    High speed cornering? Um-no. Lots of high clearance vehicles struggle
    with that. Even some you might not think. Flat out on the Autobahn?
    You are kidding right? How much do you expect out of a flat head four?
    Were you guys raiding the clinic and feeding it nitrous? Even then...
    Um-no. LOL

    FYI: That old '42 had a top speed in the high 50s. Maybe low 60s (but
    I doubt it), but its got a torque ratio at idle that's insane. Its a
    utility vehicle. By today's standards just a basic 4x4 side by side
    with a bed to haul some stuff.

    P.S. I should say I can track in the desert. Not so much in the woods.
    It depends.



    --
    Bob La Londe
    CNC Molds N Stuff
    Around 1954-55, my older brother had a jeep flat bed 2wd truck, worst
    truck he ever owned - that thing would get stuck going down hill with
    a half inch of mud on the road. My Saturday job, if the temperatur was
    below zero F, was to make certain the two heat lamps under the hood
    were turned on so that it might start for him to go out somewhere that
    night

    I think I mentioned it in another thread. Pickup trucks (classic bath
    tub bed and std cab on a frame) are usually not very good unless they
    have a load in the bed. A 2wd open diff pickup would not be my choice
    either that being said from 2001-2017 all my new service trucks were 2WD
    with auto locking diffs. (Chevy work trucks) With the normal load of
    tools, wire, and hardware they were "okay." I did not unload them to go hunting for instance. As long as I stuck to the main trails until I
    bailed out to walk I didn't even think about it.

    Of course tires make a big difference. When I ran trap lines back in
    the 80s I used a Ford F150 2WD with stock diff and 31 x 10.5 tires.
    With all my traps, coolers, and camp gear it did quite well. If I
    remembered to air down all four) it was passable on most sand, but it
    would still sink in bottomless sugar sand. I got it stuck a couple
    times, but always got it out on my own. Sometimes it took all day, but
    that is the life of a wannabe professional outdoorsman. Okay, my first
    year I used a Plymouth Volare station wagon. LOL I think if it had the
    same tires it would have been better than the pickup.


    --
    Bob La Londe
    CNC Molds N Stuff

    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software.
    www.avg.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bob La Londe@21:1/5 to Jim Wilkins on Wed Nov 13 13:29:54 2024
    On 11/13/2024 12:44 PM, Jim Wilkins wrote:
    "Bob La Londe"  wrote in message news:vh2s43$2b5ip$1@dont-email.me...

    I think I mentioned it in another thread.  Pickup trucks (classic bath
    tub bed and std cab on a frame) are usually not very good unless they
    have a load in the bed.  A 2wd open diff pickup would not be my choice either that being said from 2001-2017 all my new service trucks were 2WD
    with auto locking diffs.  (Chevy work trucks)  With the normal load of tools, wire, and hardware they were "okay."  I did not unload them to go hunting for instance.  As long as I stuck to the main trails until I
    bailed out to walk I didn't even think about it.

    Of course tires make a big difference.  When I ran trap lines back in
    the 80s I used a Ford F150 2WD with stock diff and 31 x 10.5 tires.
    With all my traps, coolers, and camp gear it did quite well.  If I remembered to air down all four) it was passable on most sand, but it
    would still sink in bottomless sugar sand.  I got it stuck a couple
    times, but always got it out on my own.  Sometimes it took all day, but
    that is the life of a wannabe professional outdoorsman.  Okay, my first
    year I used a Plymouth Volare station wagon.  LOL  I think if it had the same tires it would have been better than the pickup.

    Bob La Londe
    ------------------------------
    Ramblers did well in the Baja 500.

    That definitely applied to my Ranger in 2WD. It was better in 4WD. If I
    could get in somewhere with the bed empty I was sure to be able to get
    out with a load of firewood. Only dirt bike skid recovery reflexes let
    me drive the Ranger in 2WD on partly dry, partly icy pavement. A
    particularly difficult icy commute home helped convince me to buy the
    AWD CRV which was vastly better with (and good without) sticky
    hydrophilic Michelin Arctic Alpine ice tires. A wet finger rubbed on
    most tires slides, on the Michelins it grabs and squeaks.



    Generally the only complaint I hear about Michelin tires is the price.
    When I picked up my new truck I was actually a little disappointed to
    see it came with Michelin truck tires. Now I'll have to wait a few
    years to wear them out so I can upgrade to some ATs. I'm just to cheap
    to replace otherwise perfectly good tires.

    --
    Bob La Londe
    CNC Molds N Stuff

    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software.
    www.avg.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Snag@21:1/5 to Bob La Londe on Wed Nov 13 16:09:30 2024
    On 11/13/2024 3:54 PM, Bob La Londe wrote:
    On 11/13/2024 2:15 PM, Clare Snyder wrote:
    On Wed, 13 Nov 2024 13:29:54 -0700, Bob La Londe <none@none.com99>
    wrote:

    On 11/13/2024 12:44 PM, Jim Wilkins wrote:
    "Bob La Londe"  wrote in message news:vh2s43$2b5ip$1@dont-email.me... >>>>
    I think I mentioned it in another thread.  Pickup trucks (classic bath >>>> tub bed and std cab on a frame) are usually not very good unless they
    have a load in the bed.  A 2wd open diff pickup would not be my choice >>>> either that being said from 2001-2017 all my new service trucks were
    2WD
    with auto locking diffs.  (Chevy work trucks)  With the normal load of >>>> tools, wire, and hardware they were "okay."  I did not unload them
    to go
    hunting for instance.  As long as I stuck to the main trails until I
    bailed out to walk I didn't even think about it.

    Of course tires make a big difference.  When I ran trap lines back in >>>> the 80s I used a Ford F150 2WD with stock diff and 31 x 10.5 tires.
    With all my traps, coolers, and camp gear it did quite well.  If I
    remembered to air down all four) it was passable on most sand, but it
    would still sink in bottomless sugar sand.  I got it stuck a couple
    times, but always got it out on my own.  Sometimes it took all day, but >>>> that is the life of a wannabe professional outdoorsman.  Okay, my first >>>> year I used a Plymouth Volare station wagon.  LOL  I think if it had >>>> the
    same tires it would have been better than the pickup.

    Bob La Londe
    ------------------------------
    Ramblers did well in the Baja 500.

    That definitely applied to my Ranger in 2WD. It was better in 4WD. If I >>>> could get in somewhere with the bed empty I was sure to be able to get >>>> out with a load of firewood. Only dirt bike skid recovery reflexes let >>>> me drive the Ranger in 2WD on partly dry, partly icy pavement. A
    particularly difficult icy commute home helped convince me to buy the
    AWD CRV which was vastly better with (and good without) sticky
    hydrophilic Michelin Arctic Alpine ice tires. A wet finger rubbed on
    most tires slides, on the Michelins it grabs and squeaks.



    Generally the only complaint I hear about Michelin tires is the price.
    When I picked up my new truck I was actually a little disappointed to
    see it came with Michelin truck tires.  Now I'll have to wait a few
    years to wear them out so I can upgrade to some ATs.  I'm just to cheap >>> to replace otherwise perfectly good tires.

    --
    Bob La Londe
    CNC Molds N Stuff
    Virtually every Michelin tire I have owned has had the sidewalls
    checker and crack long before the tread wore out - and that goes back
    to early 1960s? Michelin X tires and up to my last xlts. I've never
    wore one out - - - - and they have hardened up to the point they would
    have made good "burnout tires" even on a 4 or 6 cyl vehicle.
      Yes, they all lasted over 6 years - but on many that was less than
    30000 KM. REALLY burns to have to throw away expensive rubber with
    over 80% tread left!!!!!

    Virtually all tires have one major weakness.  They degrade with exposure
    to the C02 in the air.  Buna (neoprene) rubber o-rings too.  Buna-N,
    Viton, and silicone much less so.



    I thought it was exposure to sunlight/UV that caused most of the
    sidewall degradation ... or are those aftermarket tire covers (in
    particular for RV's and campers) just another scam ?
    --
    Snag
    Voting for Kamabla after Biden
    is like changing your shirt because
    you shit your pants .

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bob La Londe@21:1/5 to Clare Snyder on Wed Nov 13 14:54:44 2024
    On 11/13/2024 2:15 PM, Clare Snyder wrote:
    On Wed, 13 Nov 2024 13:29:54 -0700, Bob La Londe <none@none.com99>
    wrote:

    On 11/13/2024 12:44 PM, Jim Wilkins wrote:
    "Bob La Londe"  wrote in message news:vh2s43$2b5ip$1@dont-email.me...

    I think I mentioned it in another thread.  Pickup trucks (classic bath
    tub bed and std cab on a frame) are usually not very good unless they
    have a load in the bed.  A 2wd open diff pickup would not be my choice
    either that being said from 2001-2017 all my new service trucks were 2WD >>> with auto locking diffs.  (Chevy work trucks)  With the normal load of >>> tools, wire, and hardware they were "okay."  I did not unload them to go >>> hunting for instance.  As long as I stuck to the main trails until I
    bailed out to walk I didn't even think about it.

    Of course tires make a big difference.  When I ran trap lines back in
    the 80s I used a Ford F150 2WD with stock diff and 31 x 10.5 tires.
    With all my traps, coolers, and camp gear it did quite well.  If I
    remembered to air down all four) it was passable on most sand, but it
    would still sink in bottomless sugar sand.  I got it stuck a couple
    times, but always got it out on my own.  Sometimes it took all day, but >>> that is the life of a wannabe professional outdoorsman.  Okay, my first >>> year I used a Plymouth Volare station wagon.  LOL  I think if it had the >>> same tires it would have been better than the pickup.

    Bob La Londe
    ------------------------------
    Ramblers did well in the Baja 500.

    That definitely applied to my Ranger in 2WD. It was better in 4WD. If I
    could get in somewhere with the bed empty I was sure to be able to get
    out with a load of firewood. Only dirt bike skid recovery reflexes let
    me drive the Ranger in 2WD on partly dry, partly icy pavement. A
    particularly difficult icy commute home helped convince me to buy the
    AWD CRV which was vastly better with (and good without) sticky
    hydrophilic Michelin Arctic Alpine ice tires. A wet finger rubbed on
    most tires slides, on the Michelins it grabs and squeaks.



    Generally the only complaint I hear about Michelin tires is the price.
    When I picked up my new truck I was actually a little disappointed to
    see it came with Michelin truck tires. Now I'll have to wait a few
    years to wear them out so I can upgrade to some ATs. I'm just to cheap
    to replace otherwise perfectly good tires.

    --
    Bob La Londe
    CNC Molds N Stuff
    Virtually every Michelin tire I have owned has had the sidewalls
    checker and crack long before the tread wore out - and that goes back
    to early 1960s? Michelin X tires and up to my last xlts. I've never
    wore one out - - - - and they have hardened up to the point they would
    have made good "burnout tires" even on a 4 or 6 cyl vehicle.
    Yes, they all lasted over 6 years - but on many that was less than
    30000 KM. REALLY burns to have to throw away expensive rubber with
    over 80% tread left!!!!!

    Virtually all tires have one major weakness. They degrade with exposure
    to the C02 in the air. Buna (neoprene) rubber o-rings too. Buna-N,
    Viton, and silicone much less so.


    --
    Bob La Londe
    CNC Molds N Stuff

    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software.
    www.avg.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Clare Snyder@21:1/5 to All on Wed Nov 13 16:15:57 2024
    On Wed, 13 Nov 2024 13:29:54 -0700, Bob La Londe <none@none.com99>
    wrote:

    On 11/13/2024 12:44 PM, Jim Wilkins wrote:
    "Bob La Londe"á wrote in message news:vh2s43$2b5ip$1@dont-email.me...

    I think I mentioned it in another thread.á Pickup trucks (classic bath
    tub bed and std cab on a frame) are usually not very good unless they
    have a load in the bed.á A 2wd open diff pickup would not be my choice
    either that being said from 2001-2017 all my new service trucks were 2WD
    with auto locking diffs.á (Chevy work trucks)á With the normal load of
    tools, wire, and hardware they were "okay."á I did not unload them to go
    hunting for instance.á As long as I stuck to the main trails until I
    bailed out to walk I didn't even think about it.

    Of course tires make a big difference.á When I ran trap lines back in
    the 80s I used a Ford F150 2WD with stock diff and 31 x 10.5 tires.
    With all my traps, coolers, and camp gear it did quite well.á If I
    remembered to air down all four) it was passable on most sand, but it
    would still sink in bottomless sugar sand.á I got it stuck a couple
    times, but always got it out on my own.á Sometimes it took all day, but
    that is the life of a wannabe professional outdoorsman.á Okay, my first
    year I used a Plymouth Volare station wagon.á LOLá I think if it had the
    same tires it would have been better than the pickup.

    Bob La Londe
    ------------------------------
    Ramblers did well in the Baja 500.

    That definitely applied to my Ranger in 2WD. It was better in 4WD. If I
    could get in somewhere with the bed empty I was sure to be able to get
    out with a load of firewood. Only dirt bike skid recovery reflexes let
    me drive the Ranger in 2WD on partly dry, partly icy pavement. A
    particularly difficult icy commute home helped convince me to buy the
    AWD CRV which was vastly better with (and good without) sticky
    hydrophilic Michelin Arctic Alpine ice tires. A wet finger rubbed on
    most tires slides, on the Michelins it grabs and squeaks.



    Generally the only complaint I hear about Michelin tires is the price.
    When I picked up my new truck I was actually a little disappointed to
    see it came with Michelin truck tires. Now I'll have to wait a few
    years to wear them out so I can upgrade to some ATs. I'm just to cheap
    to replace otherwise perfectly good tires.

    --
    Bob La Londe
    CNC Molds N Stuff
    Virtually every Michelin tire I have owned has had the sidewalls
    checker and crack long before the tread wore out - and that goes back
    to early 1960s? Michelin X tires and up to my last xlts. I've never
    wore one out - - - - and they have hardened up to the point they would
    have made good "burnout tires" even on a 4 or 6 cyl vehicle.
    Yes, they all lasted over 6 years - but on many that was less than
    30000 KM. REALLY burns to have to throw away expensive rubber with
    over 80% tread left!!!!!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bob La Londe@21:1/5 to Snag on Wed Nov 13 15:24:05 2024
    On 11/13/2024 3:09 PM, Snag wrote:
    On 11/13/2024 3:54 PM, Bob La Londe wrote:
    On 11/13/2024 2:15 PM, Clare Snyder wrote:
    On Wed, 13 Nov 2024 13:29:54 -0700, Bob La Londe <none@none.com99>
    wrote:

    On 11/13/2024 12:44 PM, Jim Wilkins wrote:
    "Bob La Londe"  wrote in message news:vh2s43$2b5ip$1@dont-email.me... >>>>>
    I think I mentioned it in another thread.  Pickup trucks (classic bath >>>>> tub bed and std cab on a frame) are usually not very good unless they >>>>> have a load in the bed.  A 2wd open diff pickup would not be my choice >>>>> either that being said from 2001-2017 all my new service trucks
    were 2WD
    with auto locking diffs.  (Chevy work trucks)  With the normal load of >>>>> tools, wire, and hardware they were "okay."  I did not unload them
    to go
    hunting for instance.  As long as I stuck to the main trails until I >>>>> bailed out to walk I didn't even think about it.

    Of course tires make a big difference.  When I ran trap lines back in >>>>> the 80s I used a Ford F150 2WD with stock diff and 31 x 10.5 tires.
    With all my traps, coolers, and camp gear it did quite well.  If I
    remembered to air down all four) it was passable on most sand, but it >>>>> would still sink in bottomless sugar sand.  I got it stuck a couple >>>>> times, but always got it out on my own.  Sometimes it took all day, >>>>> but
    that is the life of a wannabe professional outdoorsman.  Okay, my
    first
    year I used a Plymouth Volare station wagon.  LOL  I think if it
    had the
    same tires it would have been better than the pickup.

    Bob La Londe
    ------------------------------
    Ramblers did well in the Baja 500.

    That definitely applied to my Ranger in 2WD. It was better in 4WD.
    If I
    could get in somewhere with the bed empty I was sure to be able to get >>>>> out with a load of firewood. Only dirt bike skid recovery reflexes let >>>>> me drive the Ranger in 2WD on partly dry, partly icy pavement. A
    particularly difficult icy commute home helped convince me to buy the >>>>> AWD CRV which was vastly better with (and good without) sticky
    hydrophilic Michelin Arctic Alpine ice tires. A wet finger rubbed on >>>>> most tires slides, on the Michelins it grabs and squeaks.



    Generally the only complaint I hear about Michelin tires is the price. >>>> When I picked up my new truck I was actually a little disappointed to
    see it came with Michelin truck tires.  Now I'll have to wait a few
    years to wear them out so I can upgrade to some ATs.  I'm just to cheap >>>> to replace otherwise perfectly good tires.

    --
    Bob La Londe
    CNC Molds N Stuff
    Virtually every Michelin tire I have owned has had the sidewalls
    checker and crack long before the tread wore out - and that goes back
    to early 1960s? Michelin X tires and up to my last xlts. I've never
    wore one out - - - - and they have hardened up to the point they would
    have made good "burnout tires" even on a 4 or 6 cyl vehicle.
      Yes, they all lasted over 6 years - but on many that was less than
    30000 KM. REALLY burns to have to throw away expensive rubber with
    over 80% tread left!!!!!

    Virtually all tires have one major weakness.  They degrade with
    exposure to the C02 in the air.  Buna (neoprene) rubber o-rings too.
    Buna-N, Viton, and silicone much less so.



      I thought it was exposure to sunlight/UV that caused most of the
    sidewall degradation ... or are those aftermarket tire covers (in
    particular for RV's and campers) just another scam ?


    Yeah I don't know for sure. UV is certainly capable of damaging a lot
    of things. I do know CO2 is an issue with some rubbers. I was told
    by... well somebody... that tires were among them.

    --
    Bob La Londe
    CNC Molds N Stuff

    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software.
    www.avg.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Clare Snyder@21:1/5 to All on Wed Nov 13 22:00:20 2024
    On Wed, 13 Nov 2024 14:54:44 -0700, Bob La Londe <none@none.com99>
    wrote:

    On 11/13/2024 2:15 PM, Clare Snyder wrote:
    On Wed, 13 Nov 2024 13:29:54 -0700, Bob La Londe <none@none.com99>
    wrote:

    On 11/13/2024 12:44 PM, Jim Wilkins wrote:
    "Bob La Londe"á wrote in message news:vh2s43$2b5ip$1@dont-email.me...

    I think I mentioned it in another thread.á Pickup trucks (classic bath >>>> tub bed and std cab on a frame) are usually not very good unless they
    have a load in the bed.á A 2wd open diff pickup would not be my choice >>>> either that being said from 2001-2017 all my new service trucks were 2WD >>>> with auto locking diffs.á (Chevy work trucks)á With the normal load of >>>> tools, wire, and hardware they were "okay."á I did not unload them to go >>>> hunting for instance.á As long as I stuck to the main trails until I
    bailed out to walk I didn't even think about it.

    Of course tires make a big difference.á When I ran trap lines back in
    the 80s I used a Ford F150 2WD with stock diff and 31 x 10.5 tires.
    With all my traps, coolers, and camp gear it did quite well.á If I
    remembered to air down all four) it was passable on most sand, but it
    would still sink in bottomless sugar sand.á I got it stuck a couple
    times, but always got it out on my own.á Sometimes it took all day, but >>>> that is the life of a wannabe professional outdoorsman.á Okay, my first >>>> year I used a Plymouth Volare station wagon.á LOLá I think if it had the >>>> same tires it would have been better than the pickup.

    Bob La Londe
    ------------------------------
    Ramblers did well in the Baja 500.

    That definitely applied to my Ranger in 2WD. It was better in 4WD. If I >>>> could get in somewhere with the bed empty I was sure to be able to get >>>> out with a load of firewood. Only dirt bike skid recovery reflexes let >>>> me drive the Ranger in 2WD on partly dry, partly icy pavement. A
    particularly difficult icy commute home helped convince me to buy the
    AWD CRV which was vastly better with (and good without) sticky
    hydrophilic Michelin Arctic Alpine ice tires. A wet finger rubbed on
    most tires slides, on the Michelins it grabs and squeaks.



    Generally the only complaint I hear about Michelin tires is the price.
    When I picked up my new truck I was actually a little disappointed to
    see it came with Michelin truck tires. Now I'll have to wait a few
    years to wear them out so I can upgrade to some ATs. I'm just to cheap
    to replace otherwise perfectly good tires.

    --
    Bob La Londe
    CNC Molds N Stuff
    Virtually every Michelin tire I have owned has had the sidewalls
    checker and crack long before the tread wore out - and that goes back
    to early 1960s? Michelin X tires and up to my last xlts. I've never
    wore one out - - - - and they have hardened up to the point they would
    have made good "burnout tires" even on a 4 or 6 cyl vehicle.
    Yes, they all lasted over 6 years - but on many that was less than
    30000 KM. REALLY burns to have to throw away expensive rubber with
    over 80% tread left!!!!!

    Virtually all tires have one major weakness. They degrade with exposure
    to the C02 in the air. Buna (neoprene) rubber o-rings too. Buna-N,
    Viton, and silicone much less so.


    --
    Bob La Londe
    CNC Molds N Stuff
    I don't have the problem on my Nokians, didn't have on my Dunlops, or
    my Coopers. My BFGs and Uniroyals were not as bad as the Michelins but
    darn close. The Uniroyals were the only ones I wore out -less than
    30,000Km

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Clare Snyder@21:1/5 to Snag on Wed Nov 13 22:06:15 2024
    On Wed, 13 Nov 2024 16:09:30 -0600, Snag <Snag_one@msn.com> wrote:

    On 11/13/2024 3:54 PM, Bob La Londe wrote:
    On 11/13/2024 2:15 PM, Clare Snyder wrote:
    On Wed, 13 Nov 2024 13:29:54 -0700, Bob La Londe <none@none.com99>
    wrote:

    On 11/13/2024 12:44 PM, Jim Wilkins wrote:
    "Bob La Londe"á wrote in message news:vh2s43$2b5ip$1@dont-email.me... >>>>>
    I think I mentioned it in another thread.á Pickup trucks (classic bath >>>>> tub bed and std cab on a frame) are usually not very good unless they >>>>> have a load in the bed.á A 2wd open diff pickup would not be my choice >>>>> either that being said from 2001-2017 all my new service trucks were >>>>> 2WD
    with auto locking diffs.á (Chevy work trucks)á With the normal load of >>>>> tools, wire, and hardware they were "okay."á I did not unload them
    to go
    hunting for instance.á As long as I stuck to the main trails until I >>>>> bailed out to walk I didn't even think about it.

    Of course tires make a big difference.á When I ran trap lines back in >>>>> the 80s I used a Ford F150 2WD with stock diff and 31 x 10.5 tires.
    With all my traps, coolers, and camp gear it did quite well.á If I
    remembered to air down all four) it was passable on most sand, but it >>>>> would still sink in bottomless sugar sand.á I got it stuck a couple
    times, but always got it out on my own.á Sometimes it took all day, but >>>>> that is the life of a wannabe professional outdoorsman.á Okay, my first >>>>> year I used a Plymouth Volare station wagon.á LOLá I think if it had >>>>> the
    same tires it would have been better than the pickup.

    Bob La Londe
    ------------------------------
    Ramblers did well in the Baja 500.

    That definitely applied to my Ranger in 2WD. It was better in 4WD. If I >>>>> could get in somewhere with the bed empty I was sure to be able to get >>>>> out with a load of firewood. Only dirt bike skid recovery reflexes let >>>>> me drive the Ranger in 2WD on partly dry, partly icy pavement. A
    particularly difficult icy commute home helped convince me to buy the >>>>> AWD CRV which was vastly better with (and good without) sticky
    hydrophilic Michelin Arctic Alpine ice tires. A wet finger rubbed on >>>>> most tires slides, on the Michelins it grabs and squeaks.



    Generally the only complaint I hear about Michelin tires is the price. >>>> When I picked up my new truck I was actually a little disappointed to
    see it came with Michelin truck tires.á Now I'll have to wait a few
    years to wear them out so I can upgrade to some ATs.á I'm just to cheap >>>> to replace otherwise perfectly good tires.

    --
    Bob La Londe
    CNC Molds N Stuff
    Virtually every Michelin tire I have owned has had the sidewalls
    checker and crack long before the tread wore out - and that goes back
    to early 1960s? Michelin X tires and up to my last xlts. I've never
    wore one out - - - - and they have hardened up to the point they would
    have made good "burnout tires" even on a 4 or 6 cyl vehicle.
    á Yes, they all lasted over 6 years - but on many that was less than
    30000 KM. REALLY burns to have to throw away expensive rubber with
    over 80% tread left!!!!!

    Virtually all tires have one major weakness.á They degrade with exposure
    to the C02 in the air.á Buna (neoprene) rubber o-rings too.á Buna-N,
    Viton, and silicone much less so.



    I thought it was exposure to sunlight/UV that caused most of the
    sidewall degradation ... or are those aftermarket tire covers (in
    particular for RV's and campers) just another scam ?
    It's not Co2 - it's OZONE - which is produced by sunlight acting on
    oxygen. This brakes down polymers with dual bonds. Some rubbers are a
    LOT more succeptible to Ozone damage than others.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Peter Fairbrother@21:1/5 to Snag on Fri Nov 15 21:27:57 2024
    On 13/11/2024 22:09, Snag wrote:

      I thought it was exposure to sunlight/UV that caused most of the
    sidewall degradation ... or are those aftermarket tire covers (in
    particular for RV's and campers) just another scam ?
    It's usually the UV which does the damage, though ozone cracking can
    also occur. Mostly tyres rely only on the carbon black for UV protection
    - I don't know of any other anti-UV additives which are widely used in
    tyres. Better tyres may however contain (more or better) antiozonants
    (yes, a real word, and thing).

    I haven't come across aftermarket tire covers, but if a tyre is going to
    be exposed outside for long periods, like RVs and campers, on a first
    look just to prevent UV exposure they would make sense. They might also
    slow exposure to ozone by providing a physical boundary, or be lined
    with something which is more reactive with ozone than tyres - likely, as
    ozone reacts with most plastics and fibers.

    Tyres are made to last for 5 to 7 years, because on a normal car they
    would need replacing due to wear after this time. However a RV or camper
    might not need type replacement due to wear for decades, so protection
    from UV and ozone could save a lot of money.


    Whitewall tyres were originally made using zinc oxide as pigment, but
    they use titanium dioxide nowadays. White rubber is more susceptible to
    UV than black, because the lampblack or carbon black which makes tyres
    black also helps protect the rubber against UV.

    The carbon black does several other things. It decreases susceptibility
    to attack by oxygen, increases the thermal conductivity - important to
    prevent parts of the tyre from getting too hot -, strengthens the vulcanisation, increases the tensile strength of the rubber, and
    increases abrasion resistance. Whew, good stuff!


    Peter Fairbrother

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)