• Re: 1991 ranger brake problem - CO2 & O3

    From Peter Fairbrother@21:1/5 to Jim Wilkins on Mon Nov 18 02:09:47 2024
    On 15/11/2024 13:20, Jim Wilkins wrote:
    Chemistry is
    too complex for simple explanations. My 4 year degree in it qualified me
    only to understand further education which the Vietnam draft prevented, though the knowledge of matter, energy and quantum mechanics gave me a
    boost into other fields like semiconductor physics.

    I dunno. I only did a three year (Hons) degree ;) Can do some quantum
    stuff, and pde's, sometimes, but failed conic sections till years later. Perhaps because they have little to do with chemistry. i digress.

    If you keep it to atoms made of nuclei and electrons, without going into
    the quantum physics but with a little electron cloud handwavium, it can
    be fairly understandable. But often l o o o o n n g, especially if you
    include reaction mechanisms.

    One of my favourites is when in a house to describe the rooms as
    electron clouds of atoms, each with one nucleus - just barely visible to
    scale - in each room.

    But even if you do get it all in there, and get it understandable (and
    correct, of course), does it help the average citizen or even
    tekki-sheddi? Possibly not. So it squirms back into the murk of
    knowledge which is never going to be used.

    Or gets relegated to Google storage - keep the outline, search for
    details if/when needed. Especially in chemistry where there are over a
    billion entries in the Beilstein/Gmelin/Reaxys database...

    In places like this I try to curate for a curious intelligent person,
    with a smattering of science, to feel that I answered a question or they learned something, hopefully light enough to float in the murk... or an
    outline worth remembering.

    Peter Fairbrother

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bob La Londe@21:1/5 to Jim Wilkins on Thu Nov 14 12:31:00 2024
    On 11/13/2024 4:58 PM, Jim Wilkins wrote:
    "Bob La Londe"  wrote in message news:vh38u5$2dg8a$2@dont-email.me...

    On 11/13/2024 3:09 PM, Snag wrote:

       I thought it was exposure to sunlight/UV that caused most of the
    sidewall degradation ... or are those aftermarket tire covers (in
    particular for RV's and campers) just another scam ?


    Yeah I don't know for sure.  UV is certainly capable of damaging a lot
    of things.  I do know CO2 is an issue with some rubbers.  I was told
    by... well somebody... that tires were among them.


    Nobody likes to be wrong, so I did some look ups.

    CO2 is said to contribute to the breakdown of rubber on several sites.
    Some say "distressed" CO2 and others just generically say CO2. O3 also contributes to the break down of rubbers and is more reactive. Then I
    looked at concentrations per a few other references. They say CO2 is
    present at ground level from 300 to 900 PPM (million) where as O3 is
    typically present at 20-30 PPB (billion).

    As to whether the difference in available molecules makes a real
    difference in which has more net affect I do not know, but the numbers
    do make you think.

    I recall now where I first ran across the reference to CO2 and its
    reactivity with rubbers. I don't recall exactly who it was (could have
    been Bob Sterne), but it was in regards to tuning, building, and
    repairing airguns. Admittedly air can be quite distressed in a spring
    piston gun generating enough sudden compression to detonate oils or in a
    PCP gun where air can be stored at pressures as high as 4500PSI. Over
    300 bar for the metric crowd.

    I'm not saying I was right and you were wrong. Not at all. I could
    very well be wrong still. My "expertise" with material science is
    limited to rote memory and blue collar experience. I'm just stating it
    might not be as cut and dried as as it seems. I would argue in full on
    flat Earther fashion... "Nothing is ever totally settled science." LOL.

    --
    Bob La Londe
    CNC Molds N Stuff

    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software.
    www.avg.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Clare Snyder@21:1/5 to All on Thu Nov 14 20:55:24 2024
    On Thu, 14 Nov 2024 12:31:00 -0700, Bob La Londe <none@none.com99>
    wrote:

    On 11/13/2024 4:58 PM, Jim Wilkins wrote:
    "Bob La Londe"á wrote in message news:vh38u5$2dg8a$2@dont-email.me...

    On 11/13/2024 3:09 PM, Snag wrote:

    áá I thought it was exposure to sunlight/UV that caused most of the
    sidewall degradation ... or are those aftermarket tire covers (in
    particular for RV's and campers) just another scam ?


    Yeah I don't know for sure.á UV is certainly capable of damaging a lot
    of things.á I do know CO2 is an issue with some rubbers.á I was told
    by... well somebody... that tires were among them.


    Nobody likes to be wrong, so I did some look ups.

    CO2 is said to contribute to the breakdown of rubber on several sites.
    Some say "distressed" CO2 and others just generically say CO2. O3 also >contributes to the break down of rubbers and is more reactive. Then I
    looked at concentrations per a few other references. They say CO2 is
    present at ground level from 300 to 900 PPM (million) where as O3 is >typically present at 20-30 PPB (billion).

    As to whether the difference in available molecules makes a real
    difference in which has more net affect I do not know, but the numbers
    do make you think.

    I recall now where I first ran across the reference to CO2 and its
    reactivity with rubbers. I don't recall exactly who it was (could have
    been Bob Sterne), but it was in regards to tuning, building, and
    repairing airguns. Admittedly air can be quite distressed in a spring
    piston gun generating enough sudden compression to detonate oils or in a
    PCP gun where air can be stored at pressures as high as 4500PSI. Over
    300 bar for the metric crowd.

    I'm not saying I was right and you were wrong. Not at all. I could
    very well be wrong still. My "expertise" with material science is
    limited to rote memory and blue collar experience. I'm just stating it
    might not be as cut and dried as as it seems. I would argue in full on
    flat Earther fashion... "Nothing is ever totally settled science." LOL.

    --
    Bob La Londe
    CNC Molds N Stuff

    From Wiki

    iny traces of ozone in the air will attack double bonds in rubber
    chains, with natural rubber, polybutadiene, styrene-butadiene rubber
    and nitrile rubber being most sensitive to degradation.[1] Every
    repeat unit in the first three materials has a double bond, so every
    unit can be degraded by ozone. Nitrile rubber is a copolymer of
    butadiene and acrylonitrile units, but the proportion of acrylonitrile
    is usually lower than butadiene, so attack occurs. Butyl rubber is
    more resistant but still has a small number of double bonds in its
    chains, so attack is possible. Exposed surfaces are attacked first,
    the density of cracks varying with ozone gas concentration. The higher
    the concentration, the greater the number of cracks formed.

    Ozone-resistant elastomers include EPDM, fluoroelastomers like Viton
    and polychloroprene rubbers like Neoprene. Attack is less likely
    because double bonds form a very small proportion of the chains, and
    with the latter, the chlorination reduces the electron density in the
    double bonds, therefore lowering their propensity to react with ozone.
    Silicone rubber, Hypalon and polyurethanes are also ozone-resistant.
    Form of cracking
    Macrophotograph of ozone cracking in NBR (Nitrile Butadiene Rubber)
    diaphragm seal

    Ozone cracks form in products under tension, but the critical strain
    is very small. The cracks are always oriented at right angles to the
    strain axis, so will form around the circumference in a rubber tube
    bent over. Such cracks are very dangerous when they occur in fuel
    pipes because the cracks will grow from the outside exposed surfaces
    into the bore of the pipe, so fuel leakage and fire may follow. Seals
    are also susceptible to attack, such as diaphragm seals in air lines.
    Such seals are often critical for the operation of pneumatic controls,
    and if a crack penetrates the seal, all functions of the system can be
    lost. Nitrile rubber seals are commonly used in pneumatic systems
    because of its oil resistance. However, if ozone gas is present,
    cracking will occur in the seals unless preventative measures are
    taken. Ozone attack will occur at the most sensitive zones in a seal, especially sharp corners where the strain is greatest when the seal is
    flexing in use. The corners represent stress concentrations, so the
    tension is at a maximum when the diaphragm of the seal is bent under
    air pressure.

    The reaction occurring between double bonds and ozone is known as
    ozonolysis when one molecule of the gas reacts with the double bond:
    A generalized scheme of ozonolysis

    The immediate result is formation of an ozonide, which then decomposes
    rapidly so that the double bond is cleaved. This is the critical step
    in chain breakage when polymers are attacked. The strength of polymers
    depends on the chain molecular weight or degree of polymerization, the
    higher the chain length, the greater the mechanical strength (such as
    tensile strength). By cleaving the chain, the molecular weight drops
    rapidly and there comes a point when it has little strength
    whatsoever, and a crack forms. Further attack occurs in the freshly
    exposed crack surfaces and the crack grows steadily until it completes
    a circuit and the product separates or fails. In the case of a seal or
    a tube, failure occurs when the wall of the device is penetrated.

    The carbonyl end groups which are formed are usually aldehydes or
    ketones, which can oxidise further to carboxylic acids. The net result
    is a high concentration of elemental oxygen on the crack surfaces,
    which can be detected using energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy in
    the environmental SEM, or ESEM. The spectrum at left shows the high
    oxygen peak compared with a constant sulfur peak.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Peter Fairbrother@21:1/5 to Bob La Londe on Fri Nov 15 02:26:10 2024
    On 14/11/2024 19:31, Bob La Londe wrote:
    On 11/13/2024 4:58 PM, Jim Wilkins wrote:
    "Bob La Londe"  wrote in message news:vh38u5$2dg8a$2@dont-email.me...

    On 11/13/2024 3:09 PM, Snag wrote:

       I thought it was exposure to sunlight/UV that caused most of the
    sidewall degradation ... or are those aftermarket tire covers (in
    particular for RV's and campers) just another scam ?


    Yeah I don't know for sure.  UV is certainly capable of damaging a lot
    of things.  I do know CO2 is an issue with some rubbers.  I was told
    by... well somebody... that tires were among them.


    Nobody likes to be wrong, so I did some look ups.

    CO2 is said to contribute to the breakdown of rubber on several sites.
    Some say "distressed" CO2 and others just generically say CO2.

    I have no idea what "distressed" CO2 is, but CO2 dissolves in tyre
    rubber, kind-of. It seeps into spaces between the molecules in the
    rubber, and can seep through the rubber. This doesn't normally do much
    damage to the rubber, but because of this seepage a tyre filled with CO2
    will deflate quicker than a tyre filled with air.

    That said, rubber in high pressure CO2 will absorb more CO2 - and if the pressure is suddenly released, as in a CO2 gun, the CO2 can bubble out, damaging the rubber, perhaps severely.

    Another thing CO2 does is actually react with rubber, which can cause
    damage. However the amount of CO2 in normal air isn't likely to do much
    harm to car tyres - the normal oxygen in air will probably do more
    damage, long term - but it could well damage rubber in CO2 guns and
    airguns.

    An aside, people put lampblack (carbon) in rubber for several reasons,
    but a major one is to slow the reaction with oxygen in the air. The
    oxygen still reacts, but (somewhere between greatly simplified and lies-to-children) reacts with the lampblack instead of the rubber...
    producing CO2, which permeates out to the atmosphere... But overall, the
    rubber lasts longer.

    Rubber should not be used to seal CO2 long-term, especially under high pressure.


    UV and O3 are very different animals!! Both will aggressively attack
    rubber. And almost anything else, including humans.

    Peter Fairbrother

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)