On Tue, 3 Jun 2025 14:07:39 -0000 (UTC), "Adam H. Kerman"
<ahk@chinet.com> wrote:

I've heard different reports about the immigration status of the alleged >perpetrator Mohamed Sabry Soliman, 45. He was born in Egypt; the reports >agree he's an Egyptian national. He lived in Kuwait for 17 years.

https://abcnews.go.com/US/boulder-attack-suspect-us-illegally-homeland-security/story?id=122409898

New York Times says he sought asylum.

https://www.nytimes.com/live/2025/06/02/us/boulder-colorado-attack-suspect

Colorado Public Radio said he came to Colorado Springs from Kuwait on a >tourist visa in August 2022 (expired February 2023) and then applied for >asylum in September 2022. He was on a work permit while the application
was pending.

https://www.cpr.org/2025/06/02/boulder-attack-suspect-what-we-know/

Several stories agree that he took a gun safety class to buy a gun but
was prevented from doing so due to his citizenship status. Instead, he
built the makeshift flame thrower and Molotov cocktails.

So what grounds could there possibly be to claim asylum in the US?

I'll be the first to agree that neither Egypt nor Kuwait are heaven on
earth but since when does that give an individual from these countries
the right to enter the US illegally and claim asylum?

As I understand the law (IANAL) shouldn't the judge's first question
be to establish that the claimant has grounds to apply for asylum? And
if they fail in that, the hearing should end in seconds with a denial
and deportation order.

Sure he has a right to a hearing but having gotten it, he doesn't have
the right to have things his way (e.g. legal US status)

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

The Horny Goat <lcraver@home.ca> wrote:

Tue, 3 Jun 2025 14:07:39 -0000 (UTC), Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com>:

I've heard different reports about the immigration status of the alleged >>perpetrator Mohamed Sabry Soliman, 45. He was born in Egypt; the reports >>agree he's an Egyptian national. He lived in Kuwait for 17 years.

https://abcnews.go.com/US/boulder-attack-suspect-us-illegally-homeland-security/story?id=122409898

New York Times says he sought asylum.

https://www.nytimes.com/live/2025/06/02/us/boulder-colorado-attack-suspect

Colorado Public Radio said he came to Colorado Springs from Kuwait on a >>tourist visa in August 2022 (expired February 2023) and then applied for >>asylum in September 2022. He was on a work permit while the application
was pending.

https://www.cpr.org/2025/06/02/boulder-attack-suspect-what-we-know/

Several stories agree that he took a gun safety class to buy a gun but
was prevented from doing so due to his citizenship status. Instead, he >>built the makeshift flame thrower and Molotov cocktails.

So what grounds could there possibly be to claim asylum in the US?

An asylum claimant would state a credible fear of death, trumped-up
arrest, ethnic cleansing by a government actor. That's just to make the
claim. Somehow the claim must be proven at the hearing.

I'll be the first to agree that neither Egypt nor Kuwait are heaven on
earth but since when does that give an individual from these countries
the right to enter the US illegally and claim asylum?

No news article said he entered illegally. Reread the quote above.

As I understand the law (IANAL) shouldn't the judge's first question
be to establish that the claimant has grounds to apply for asylum? And
if they fail in that, the hearing should end in seconds with a denial
and deportation order.

He hadn't yet had his hearing.

Sure he has a right to a hearing but having gotten it, he doesn't have
the right to have things his way (e.g. legal US status)

He hadn't gotten a hearing.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)