Sysop: | Amessyroom |
---|---|
Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
Users: | 28 |
Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
Uptime: | 55:55:08 |
Calls: | 422 |
Files: | 1,025 |
Messages: | 90,762 |
As we know, for the past four and a half years, the media has shown no concern >over the millions of people Biden let flood into the country, ostensibly >claiming to be 'refugees' because they've been coached to say so by everyone >from their home governments, to American NGOs run by leftist activists, to >even officials in our own government. The only time the media rouses itself >from its stupor to complain about anything regarding the millions of illegals >in our country pretending to be refugees is when their stories fall apart >before an immigration court and they're ordered deported. Then the media can't >wait to broadcast one sob story after another about them and how inutterably >cruel and horrible America is.
But just for the sake of argument, if you had to imagine a hypothetical >scenario where 59 refugees somehow *did* get the media's attention and also >triggered a massive outrage cycle in the process, what do you think might be >the reason?
What would it take for CNN, MSNBC, and all the networks to lose their minds >over 59 refugees who have been settled in this country by the federal >government? What kind of heinous terrorist attack would those 59 people have >to be plotting? What Chinese-developed bat virus would they have to be >carrying? How many Kanye West lyrics would they have to sing on the plane in >order to make the national news media-- for the first time in recorded >history-- demand that a plane full of refugees be turned around and sent back >to where it came from?
Well, yesterday we learned the answer to that question and it turns out that >if you want the media to adopt a hard-line anti-refugee stance, the refugees >don't actually have to do anything. They don't have to say a word, even a >naughty word. Instead, the refugees just have to commit the unforgivable >cardinal sin... of being white.
Yep, if the federal government takes a break from importing hordes of >ungrateful Somalis and Haitians and Venezuelans-- if only for a minute-- and >decides instead to rescue 59 well-mannered white people, then all hell will >break loose.
Before we get into the specifics of why these particular white people are >fleeing South Africa and why the Left is so enraged by them, just take a look >at the lot of them:
They're waving American flags (not the flag of the country they're fleeing, as >so many of the illegal alien refugees do), they're holding their children, who >are well-behaved, they're speaking English, they're arriving here as intact >family units, they're respectful to American officials, they're not accepting >our largesse, then complaining about it or saying it's not good enough. In >other words, they're acting like responsible, well-adjusted, productive >people.
And under the circumstances, that's no small feat. They've been subjected to >decades of persecution in their native land solely based on their skin color, >under the theory that they deserve to be persecuted because they're white >colonizers. Never mind the fact that most of them can trace their lineage in >South Africa back 15 generations, nearly 400 years. If after four centuries, >you're not considered 'native' to a land, then the word native has no useful >meaning.
But the funny thing about the Bantu, the black population of South Africa >engaging in this white oppression, is that they themselves were colonizers. >They pushed out and/or assimilated the Khoisan people who lived in the area >that later became South Africa.
It's estimated that one white farmer is murdered every five days in South >Africa and some of these executions are brutal. It doesn't stop with >executions, either. According to Newsweek even when the Bantu activists leave >the farmers alive, they routinely show up and raid the property, taking >anything of value, and beat the families, including the children. Females, >both adults and children are also frequently raped.
The government of South Africa, however pretends this isn't happening, and >claims it's perfectly safe for whites in South Africa, which leftist activists >parrot as if it's true. They accuse Afrikaners of inventing all the homicides >and torture to which they're being subjected.
However, the government itself gives lie to its own propaganda as it passes >legislation allowing it seize land from white farmers without compensation, >and turning it over to black people. That is the express purpose of the law: >to steal land from white people and give it to black people. And, predictably, >the white people involved think that's evil. Because it is.
And while this is going on, chants of "Kill the Boer!" are being led by black >politicians everywhere from soccer stadiums to the floor of the National >Assembly.
So this is actual, verifiable government persecution. These Afrikaners are not >being coached by some leftist NGO to make up a sob story so some left-wing >administration lets them into the country, when all they really want is access >to the U.S. labor market so they can get a better or job, or even worse and >more commonly, they want access to the U.S. welfare state. That's normally how >asylum claims work. They're pretty much all fraudulent and everyone knows it.
But this is very different. The government of South Africa has given itself >authority to seize private property without compensation, which would be bad >enough even if applied fairly, but they then set about implementing that law >only against white people. "You're white so we're taking your home from you >and giving you nothing in return." If that's not official persecution, then >what is?
Asylum laws are meant for precisely this scenario: people being targeted by >their government based on characteristics they cannot control. But across the >legacy media, we're told that even if the stories of abuse and murder are >true, these Afrikaners should just stay in South Africa and take it because, >being white and all, they're not worthy of refugee status. Biden's former >Under-Secretary of State on MEET THE PRESS yesterday: "It's just a small >handful of white farmers that have been killed in the last 10 years."
Just a small handful. Who's writing this guy's notes? Ilhan Omar's speech >writer? "Some people did some things."
A little bit of race-targeted murder, torture, and rape and overt theft is >just a small price to pay for the sins of their >great-great-great-grandfathers.
Just imagine what they have planned for you if they ever get the power to >implement it.