• CNN Airs Heartfelt Sit-Down With Masked Cartel Hitman

    From Ubiquitous@21:1/5 to All on Mon May 12 04:30:48 2025
    XPost: alt.news-media, alt.journalism, alt.journalism.criticism

    To prove that Donald Trump is a very mean person while journalists are
    totally compassionate and loving, CNN has aired a sympathetic interview with
    a member of a Mexican drug cartel.

    Now, I know what you're thinking. You're thinking, "Oh, Klavan, you marvelous merchant of magical mirth, only you could invent a scenario in which a Left- wing news outlet sinks so deeply into the bubbling tarpit of its own twisted political hatred that the lunatic idea of legitimizing a death-mongering gangster could wend its way through every level of internal decision-making without one voice of even semi-decency speaking up to say, "Wait, wait, we can't allow our childish demonization of our political opponents to twist our souls into gnarled burnt offerings fit only for the altars of hell so that we actually call evil good and good evil right there on cable TV in front of our six or seven viewers."

    But no, my friends, I am not making this up.

    CNN girl reporter Shapely Nudnick actually traveled to a Mexican hideout
    where she spoke sympathetically with a masked member of the Sinaloa Drug Cartel, whose former boss El Chapo was said to be personally responsible for the deaths of over 34,000 people.

    Ms. Nudnick, winner of this year's Pulitzer prize for most attractive
    backside, fetchingly leaned forward and asked the masked gangster - and as
    God is my witness, I am not making this up, "According to the Trump Administration, you are a terrorist ... What do you make of that?"

    The masked member of the murderous cartel responded, "I don't like to get overly emotional because my job depends on inspiring terror in anyone who
    tries to stand in my way, but I must be honest and tell you this slur from
    your President Trump hurt my feelings very deeply. I am just a man trying to make a living in this crazy world, and when I heard I had been labeled a terrorist, my hands were literally shaking so hard I could barely shove a screwdriver into the face of one of my rivals. I respect President Trump, and respect is very important because people who don't return my respect are
    often found inside plastic bags in several different locations. But a man
    must eat and, to be fair, our customers are mostly in the United States and
    as any good businessman will tell you, you have to go where the customers are and then slowly poison them to death. I hope the American people will push
    back against this insult, and if they don't, I know where they live."

    CNN has proudly announced that this interview is only the first in a new
    series of self-degrading acts of pure evil that will appear over the course
    of the Trump Presidency, and they've been airing tantalizing previews of
    future episodes. In one clip, Shapely Nudnik bravely travels to an
    undisclosed elementary school to interview a pedophile teacher who says, "I think it's very cruel for people to demonize someone they don't even know
    with ugly words like pervert and evil scum-sucking hell-fiend. I just thank heavens I belong to a teachers' union where they support the idea that minor attracted persons can work at an elementary school. After all, that's where
    the children are, not to mention the porn."

    In another clip, Miss Nudnick scores an interview with former Nazi torture doctor Joseph Mengele who says, "It's true I used to perform grotesque and unspeakable medical experiments on children, but I've totally reformed, and
    now I'm supplying kids with gender affirming care, because I've had a lot of practice, and that's what I'm good at."

    In other Left-wing media news, the Pulitzer committee has awarded its prize
    for photography to a picture of a bullet flying at President Trump's head. Committee Chairman Thaddeus Foul-heart said, "We know that other photo of a wounded Trump raising his fist with the American flag in the background is
    the single most iconic image of the first quarter of this century, but that photo inspired love and admiration for our president, whereas we were rooting for the bullet."

    --
    What liberal media?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From BTR1701@21:1/5 to Ubiquitous on Mon May 12 17:31:30 2025
    XPost: alt.journalism, alt.journalism.criticism, alt.news-media

    On May 12, 2025 at 1:30:48 AM PDT, "Ubiquitous" <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:

    To prove that Donald Trump is a very mean person while journalists are totally compassionate and loving, CNN has aired a sympathetic interview with a member of a Mexican drug cartel.

    Now, I know what you're thinking. You're thinking, "Oh, Klavan, you marvelous

    merchant of magical mirth, only you could invent a scenario in which a Left- wing news outlet sinks so deeply into the bubbling tarpit of its own twisted political hatred that the lunatic idea of legitimizing a death-mongering gangster could wend its way through every level of internal decision-making without one voice of even semi-decency speaking up to say, "Wait, wait, we can't allow our childish demonization of our political opponents to twist our

    souls into gnarled burnt offerings fit only for the altars of hell so that we

    actually call evil good and good evil right there on cable TV in front of our

    six or seven viewers."

    Klavan is trying his damndest here to be as over-the-top and hyperbolic as possible, but sadly, the depths to which CNN has sunk make this impossible.
    You can't parody these people anymore. Every time you come up with some so absurd and depraved to illustrate a point, they accept it as a challenge and make it reality.

    But no, my friends, I am not making this up.

    CNN girl reporter Shapely Nudnick actually traveled to a Mexican hideout where she spoke sympathetically with a masked member of the Sinaloa Drug Cartel, whose former boss El Chapo was said to be personally responsible for the deaths of over 34,000 people.

    Ms. Nudnick, winner of this year's Pulitzer prize for most attractive backside, fetchingly leaned forward and asked the masked gangster - and as God is my witness, I am not making this up, "According to the Trump Administration, you are a terrorist ... What do you make of that?"

    The masked member of the murderous cartel responded, "I don't like to get overly emotional because my job depends on inspiring terror in anyone who tries to stand in my way, but I must be honest and tell you this slur from your President Trump hurt my feelings very deeply. I am just a man trying to make a living in this crazy world, and when I heard I had been labeled a terrorist, my hands were literally shaking so hard I could barely shove a screwdriver into the face of one of my rivals. I respect President Trump, and

    respect is very important because people who don't return my respect are often found inside plastic bags in several different locations. But a man must eat and, to be fair, our customers are mostly in the United States and as any good businessman will tell you, you have to go where the customers are

    and then slowly poison them to death. I hope the American people will push back against this insult, and if they don't, I know where they live."

    CNN has proudly announced that this interview is only the first in a new series of self-degrading acts of pure evil that will appear over the course of the Trump Presidency, and they've been airing tantalizing previews of future episodes. In one clip, Shapely Nudnik bravely travels to an undisclosed elementary school to interview a pedophile teacher who says, "I think it's very cruel for people to demonize someone they don't even know with ugly words like pervert and evil scum-sucking hell-fiend. I just thank heavens I belong to a teachers' union where they support the idea that minor attracted persons can work at an elementary school. After all, that's where the children are, not to mention the porn."

    Case in point. The idea that a school wouldn't or couldn't fire a pedophile teacher caught abusing children seems outrageously ridiculous. Over course
    that wouldn't happen, right? Leftists administrators and union members in L.A. say "Hold my beer".

    Several years ago, we had a teacher in Los Angeles who was blindfolding kids and feeding them cookies frosted with his own semen.

    He was arrested and indicted but due to the union rules, the school district couldn't fire him. He was collecting his paycheck while sitting in a jail cell. The only way the could get rid of him was to negotiate with him to voluntarily quit, for which he received a hefty cash payout.

    If the union is so powerful that we can't fire a teacher who is forcing kids
    to eat his own jizz, then perhaps we need to rethink the whole concept of public employee unions.

    In another clip, Miss Nudnick scores an interview with former Nazi torture doctor Joseph Mengele who says, "It's true I used to perform grotesque and unspeakable medical experiments on children, but I've totally reformed, and now I'm supplying kids with gender affirming care, because I've had a lot of practice, and that's what I'm good at."

    In other Left-wing media news, the Pulitzer committee has awarded its prize for photography to a picture of a bullet flying at President Trump's head. Committee Chairman Thaddeus Foul-heart said, "We know that other photo of a wounded Trump raising his fist with the American flag in the background is the single most iconic image of the first quarter of this century, but that photo inspired love and admiration for our president, whereas we were rooting

    for the bullet."

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rhino@21:1/5 to All on Mon May 12 16:52:41 2025
    XPost: alt.journalism, alt.journalism.criticism, alt.news-media

    On 2025-05-12 1:31 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On May 12, 2025 at 1:30:48 AM PDT, "Ubiquitous" <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:

    To prove that Donald Trump is a very mean person while journalists are
    totally compassionate and loving, CNN has aired a sympathetic interview with >> a member of a Mexican drug cartel.

    Now, I know what you're thinking. You're thinking, "Oh, Klavan, you marvelous

    merchant of magical mirth, only you could invent a scenario in which a Left- >> wing news outlet sinks so deeply into the bubbling tarpit of its own twisted >> political hatred that the lunatic idea of legitimizing a death-mongering
    gangster could wend its way through every level of internal decision-making >> without one voice of even semi-decency speaking up to say, "Wait, wait, we >> can't allow our childish demonization of our political opponents to twist our

    souls into gnarled burnt offerings fit only for the altars of hell so that we

    actually call evil good and good evil right there on cable TV in front of our

    six or seven viewers."

    Klavan is trying his damndest here to be as over-the-top and hyperbolic as possible, but sadly, the depths to which CNN has sunk make this impossible. You can't parody these people anymore. Every time you come up with some so absurd and depraved to illustrate a point, they accept it as a challenge and make it reality.

    But no, my friends, I am not making this up.

    CNN girl reporter Shapely Nudnick actually traveled to a Mexican hideout
    where she spoke sympathetically with a masked member of the Sinaloa Drug
    Cartel, whose former boss El Chapo was said to be personally responsible for >> the deaths of over 34,000 people.

    Ms. Nudnick, winner of this year's Pulitzer prize for most attractive
    backside, fetchingly leaned forward and asked the masked gangster - and as >> God is my witness, I am not making this up, "According to the Trump
    Administration, you are a terrorist ... What do you make of that?"

    The masked member of the murderous cartel responded, "I don't like to get
    overly emotional because my job depends on inspiring terror in anyone who
    tries to stand in my way, but I must be honest and tell you this slur from >> your President Trump hurt my feelings very deeply. I am just a man trying to >> make a living in this crazy world, and when I heard I had been labeled a
    terrorist, my hands were literally shaking so hard I could barely shove a
    screwdriver into the face of one of my rivals. I respect President Trump, and

    respect is very important because people who don't return my respect are
    often found inside plastic bags in several different locations. But a man
    must eat and, to be fair, our customers are mostly in the United States and >> as any good businessman will tell you, you have to go where the customers are

    and then slowly poison them to death. I hope the American people will push >> back against this insult, and if they don't, I know where they live."

    CNN has proudly announced that this interview is only the first in a new
    series of self-degrading acts of pure evil that will appear over the course >> of the Trump Presidency, and they've been airing tantalizing previews of
    future episodes. In one clip, Shapely Nudnik bravely travels to an
    undisclosed elementary school to interview a pedophile teacher who says, "I >> think it's very cruel for people to demonize someone they don't even know
    with ugly words like pervert and evil scum-sucking hell-fiend. I just thank >> heavens I belong to a teachers' union where they support the idea that minor >> attracted persons can work at an elementary school. After all, that's where >> the children are, not to mention the porn."

    Case in point. The idea that a school wouldn't or couldn't fire a pedophile teacher caught abusing children seems outrageously ridiculous. Over course that wouldn't happen, right? Leftists administrators and union members in L.A.
    say "Hold my beer".

    Several years ago, we had a teacher in Los Angeles who was blindfolding kids and feeding them cookies frosted with his own semen.

    He was arrested and indicted but due to the union rules, the school district couldn't fire him. He was collecting his paycheck while sitting in a jail cell. The only way the could get rid of him was to negotiate with him to voluntarily quit, for which he received a hefty cash payout.

    If the union is so powerful that we can't fire a teacher who is forcing kids to eat his own jizz, then perhaps we need to rethink the whole concept of public employee unions.

    Perhaps??

    I still remember John Stossel's piece on "rubber rooms" for teachers in
    NYC. That's where they went to sit and read the newspaper (or whatever
    as long as it wasn't teaching) at full pay for YEARS while the
    incredibly convoluted process for firing a teacher was worked through.
    The particular building they filmed in had 6 storeys and was only one of several such buildings, apparently all dedicated to "rubber rooms", in
    NYC. It was pretty clear then that the process for dismissing a teacher
    was WAY too complicated but apparently the union had the power to force
    that (or the administration lacked the intestinal fortitude to say no.
    And that had to be at least 20 years ago.

    That same item looked at a black high school senior and gave him a text
    to read. It was at the level of "See Tom. See Tom run." and that poor
    kid struggled mightily to get through the few lines he had to read. If
    THAT is the best the teachers can do, I don't see how they have any
    right to these preposterously complex dismissal procedures. Maybe if
    teachers actually TAUGHT the curriculum - and the curriculum was purged
    of woke nonsense - students would actually learn something. Of course
    they'd also have to bring back some discipline so that the mere whisper
    of a hint of getting sent to the principal's office actually meant
    something. If they don't do that, the kids will not even pay attention
    to what the teacher is saying and just daydream or get into mischief.

    In another clip, Miss Nudnick scores an interview with former Nazi torture >> doctor Joseph Mengele who says, "It's true I used to perform grotesque and >> unspeakable medical experiments on children, but I've totally reformed, and >> now I'm supplying kids with gender affirming care, because I've had a lot of >> practice, and that's what I'm good at."

    In other Left-wing media news, the Pulitzer committee has awarded its prize >> for photography to a picture of a bullet flying at President Trump's head. >> Committee Chairman Thaddeus Foul-heart said, "We know that other photo of a >> wounded Trump raising his fist with the American flag in the background is >> the single most iconic image of the first quarter of this century, but that >> photo inspired love and admiration for our president, whereas we were rooting
    for the bullet."




    --
    Rhino

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From moviePig@21:1/5 to Rhino on Mon May 12 18:55:35 2025
    XPost: alt.journalism, alt.journalism.criticism, alt.news-media

    On 5/12/2025 4:52 PM, Rhino wrote:
    On 2025-05-12 1:31 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On May 12, 2025 at 1:30:48 AM PDT, "Ubiquitous" <weberm@polaris.net>
    wrote:

    To prove that Donald Trump is a very mean person while journalists are
    totally compassionate and loving, CNN has aired a sympathetic
    interview with
    a member of a Mexican drug cartel.

    Now, I know what you're thinking. You're thinking, "Oh, Klavan, you
    marvelous

    merchant of magical mirth, only you could invent a scenario in which
    a Left-
    wing news outlet sinks so deeply into the bubbling tarpit of its own
    twisted
    political hatred that the lunatic idea of legitimizing a death-mongering >>> gangster could wend its way through every level of internal decision-
    making
    without one voice of even semi-decency speaking up to say, "Wait,
    wait, we
    can't allow our childish demonization of our political opponents to
    twist our

    souls into gnarled burnt offerings fit only for the altars of hell so
    that we

    actually call evil good and good evil right there on cable TV in
    front of our

    six or seven viewers."

    Klavan is trying his damndest here to be as over-the-top and
    hyperbolic as
    possible, but sadly, the depths to which CNN has sunk make this
    impossible.
    You can't parody these people anymore. Every time you come up with
    some so
    absurd and depraved to illustrate a point, they accept it as a
    challenge and
    make it reality.

    But no, my friends, I am not making this up.

    CNN girl reporter Shapely Nudnick actually traveled to a Mexican hideout >>> where she spoke sympathetically with a masked member of the Sinaloa Drug >>> Cartel, whose former boss El Chapo was said to be personally
    responsible for
    the deaths of over 34,000 people.

    Ms. Nudnick, winner of this year's Pulitzer prize for most attractive
    backside, fetchingly leaned forward and asked the masked gangster -
    and as
    God is my witness, I am not making this up, "According to the Trump
    Administration, you are a terrorist ... What do you make of that?"

    The masked member of the murderous cartel responded, "I don't like to
    get
    overly emotional because my job depends on inspiring terror in anyone
    who
    tries to stand in my way, but I must be honest and tell you this slur
    from
    your President Trump hurt my feelings very deeply. I am just a man
    trying to
    make a living in this crazy world, and when I heard I had been labeled a >>> terrorist, my hands were literally shaking so hard I could barely
    shove a
    screwdriver into the face of one of my rivals. I respect President
    Trump, and

    respect is very important because people who don't return my respect are >>> often found inside plastic bags in several different locations. But a
    man
    must eat and, to be fair, our customers are mostly in the United
    States and
    as any good businessman will tell you, you have to go where the
    customers are

    and then slowly poison them to death. I hope the American people will
    push
    back against this insult, and if they don't, I know where they live."

    CNN has proudly announced that this interview is only the first in a new >>> series of self-degrading acts of pure evil that will appear over the
    course
    of the Trump Presidency, and they've been airing tantalizing previews of >>> future episodes. In one clip, Shapely Nudnik bravely travels to an
    undisclosed elementary school to interview a pedophile teacher who
    says, "I
    think it's very cruel for people to demonize someone they don't even
    know
    with ugly words like pervert and evil scum-sucking hell-fiend. I just
    thank
    heavens I belong to a teachers' union where they support the idea
    that minor
    attracted persons can work at an elementary school. After all, that's
    where
    the children are, not to mention the porn."

    Case in point. The idea that a school wouldn't or couldn't fire a
    pedophile
    teacher caught abusing children seems outrageously ridiculous. Over
    course
    that wouldn't happen, right? Leftists administrators and union members
    in L.A.
    say "Hold my beer".

    Several years ago, we had a teacher in Los Angeles who was
    blindfolding kids
    and feeding them cookies frosted with his own semen.

    He was arrested and indicted but due to the union rules, the school
    district
    couldn't fire him. He was collecting his paycheck while sitting  in a
    jail
    cell. The only way the could get rid of him was to negotiate with him to
    voluntarily quit, for which he received a hefty cash payout.

    If the union is so powerful that we can't fire a teacher who is
    forcing kids
    to eat his own jizz, then perhaps we need to rethink the whole concept of
    public employee unions.

    Perhaps??

    I still remember John Stossel's piece on "rubber rooms" for teachers in
    NYC. That's where they went to sit and read the newspaper (or whatever
    as long as it wasn't teaching) at full pay for YEARS while the
    incredibly convoluted process for firing a teacher was worked through.
    The particular building they filmed in had 6 storeys and was only one of several such buildings, apparently all dedicated to "rubber rooms", in
    NYC. It was pretty clear then that the process for dismissing a teacher
    was WAY too complicated but apparently the union had the power to force
    that (or the administration lacked the intestinal fortitude to say no.
    And that had to be at least 20 years ago.

    That same item looked at a black high school senior and gave him a text
    to read. It was at the level of "See Tom. See Tom run." and that poor
    kid struggled mightily to get through the few lines he had to read. If
    THAT is the best the teachers can do, I don't see how they have any
    right to these preposterously complex dismissal procedures. Maybe if
    teachers actually TAUGHT the curriculum - and the curriculum was purged
    of woke nonsense - students would actually learn something. Of course
    they'd also have to bring back some discipline so that the mere whisper
    of a hint of getting sent to the principal's office actually meant
    something. If they don't do that, the kids will not even pay attention
    to what the teacher is saying and just daydream or get into mischief.

    ...

    You blame "woke nonsense" and incompetent educators for illiteracy???

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From BTR1701@21:1/5 to moviePig on Tue May 13 03:53:12 2025
    XPost: alt.journalism, alt.journalism.criticism, alt.news-media

    On May 12, 2025 at 3:55:35 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On 5/12/2025 4:52 PM, Rhino wrote:

    That same item looked at a black high school senior and gave him a text
    to read. It was at the level of "See Tom. See Tom run." and that poor
    kid struggled mightily to get through the few lines he had to read. If
    THAT is the best the teachers can do, I don't see how they have any
    right to these preposterously complex dismissal procedures. Maybe if
    teachers actually TAUGHT the curriculum - and the curriculum was purged
    of woke nonsense - students would actually learn something. Of course
    they'd also have to bring back some discipline so that the mere whisper
    of a hint of getting sent to the principal's office actually meant
    something. If they don't do that, the kids will not even pay attention
    to what the teacher is saying and just daydream or get into mischief.


    You blame "woke nonsense" and incompetent educators for illiteracy???

    Well, it's a teacher's job to make kids literate. If they're not to blame for
    a generation of illiterate children, who is?

    It's like wondering who to blame when you hire a plumber to fix a leak and you come home to find your house flooded.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Adam H. Kerman@21:1/5 to atropos@mac.com on Tue May 13 04:12:12 2025
    BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
    May 12, 2025 at 3:55:35 PM PDT, moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
    On 5/12/2025 4:52 PM, Rhino wrote:

    That same item looked at a black high school senior and gave him a text >>>to read. It was at the level of "See Tom. See Tom run." and that poor
    kid struggled mightily to get through the few lines he had to read. If >>>THAT is the best the teachers can do, I don't see how they have any
    right to these preposterously complex dismissal procedures. Maybe if >>>teachers actually TAUGHT the curriculum - and the curriculum was purged >>>of woke nonsense - students would actually learn something. Of course >>>they'd also have to bring back some discipline so that the mere whisper >>>of a hint of getting sent to the principal's office actually meant >>>something. If they don't do that, the kids will not even pay attention
    to what the teacher is saying and just daydream or get into mischief.

    You blame "woke nonsense" and incompetent educators for illiteracy???

    Well, it's a teacher's job to make kids literate. If they're not to blame for >a generation of illiterate children, who is?

    Terrance and Phillip

    Blame Canada

    It's like wondering who to blame when you hire a plumber to fix a leak and you >come home to find your house flooded.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ubiquitous@21:1/5 to nobody@nowhere.com on Tue May 13 04:30:43 2025
    XPost: alt.journalism, alt.journalism.criticism, alt.news-media

    In article <vvtu97$1bhvt$1@dont-email.me>, nobody@nowhere.com wrote:
    On 5/12/2025 4:52 PM, Rhino wrote:
    On 2025-05-12 1:31 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On May 12, 2025 at 1:30:48 AM PDT, "Ubiquitous" <weberm@polaris.net>
    wrote:

    To prove that Donald Trump is a very mean person while journalists are >>>> totally compassionate and loving, CNN has aired a sympathetic interview >>>> with a member of a Mexican drug cartel.

    Now, I know what you're thinking. You're thinking, "Oh, Klavan, you
    marvelous merchant of magical mirth, only you could invent a scenario
    in which a Left-wing news outlet sinks so deeply into the bubbling
    tarpit of its own twisted political hatred that the lunatic idea of
    legitimizing a death-mongering gangster could wend its way through every >>>> level of internal decision-making without one voice of even semi-decency >>>> speaking up to say, "Wait, wait, we can't allow our childish
    demonization of our political opponents to twist our souls into gnarled >>>> burnt offerings fit only for the altars of hell so that we actually call >>>> evil good and good evil right there on cable TV in front of our six or >>>> seven viewers."

    Klavan is trying his damndest here to be as over-the-top and hyperbolic
    as possible, but sadly, the depths to which CNN has sunk make this
    impossible. You can't parody these people anymore. Every time you come
    up with some so absurd and depraved to illustrate a point, they accept
    it as a challenge and make it reality.

    But no, my friends, I am not making this up.

    CNN girl reporter Shapely Nudnick actually traveled to a Mexican hideout >>>> where she spoke sympathetically with a masked member of the Sinaloa Drug >>>> Cartel, whose former boss El Chapo was said to be personally
    responsible for the deaths of over 34,000 people.

    Ms. Nudnick, winner of this year's Pulitzer prize for most attractive
    backside, fetchingly leaned forward and asked the masked gangster -
    and as God is my witness, I am not making this up, "According to the
    Trump Administration, you are a terrorist ... What do you make of that?" >>>> The masked member of the murderous cartel responded, "I don't like to
    get overly emotional because my job depends on inspiring terror in
    anyone who tries to stand in my way, but I must be honest and tell you >>>> this slur from your President Trump hurt my feelings very deeply. I am >>>> just a man trying to make a living in this crazy world, and when I heard >>>> I had been labeled a terrorist, my hands were literally shaking so hard >>>> I could barely shove a screwdriver into the face of one of my rivals. I >>>> respect President Trump, and respect is very important because people
    who don't return my respect are often found inside plastic bags in
    several different locations. But a man must eat and, to be fair, our
    customers are mostly in the United States and as any good businessman
    will tell you, you have to go where the customers are and then slowly
    poison them to death. I hope the American people will push back against >>>> this insult, and if they don't, I know where they live."

    CNN has proudly announced that this interview is only the first in a new >>>> series of self-degrading acts of pure evil that will appear over the
    course of the Trump Presidency, and they've been airing tantalizing
    previews of future episodes. In one clip, Shapely Nudnik bravely travels >>>> to an undisclosed elementary school to interview a pedophile teacher who >>>> says, "I think it's very cruel for people to demonize someone they don't >>>> even know with ugly words like pervert and evil scum-sucking hell-fiend. >>>> I just thank heavens I belong to a teachers' union where they support
    the idea that minor attracted persons can work at an elementary school. >>>> After all, that's where the children are, not to mention the porn."

    Case in point. The idea that a school wouldn't or couldn't fire a
    pedophile teacher caught abusing children seems outrageously ridiculous. >>> Over course that wouldn't happen, right? Leftists administrators and
    union members in L.A. say "Hold my beer".

    Several years ago, we had a teacher in Los Angeles who was blindfolding
    kids and feeding them cookies frosted with his own semen.

    He was arrested and indicted but due to the union rules, the school
    district couldn't fire him. He was collecting his paycheck while
    sitting  in a jail cell. The only way the could get rid of him was to
    negotiate with him to voluntarily quit, for which he received a hefty
    cash payout.

    If the union is so powerful that we can't fire a teacher who is
    forcing kids to eat his own jizz, then perhaps we need to rethink the
    whole concept of public employee unions.

    Perhaps??

    I still remember John Stossel's piece on "rubber rooms" for teachers in
    NYC. That's where they went to sit and read the newspaper (or whatever
    as long as it wasn't teaching) at full pay for YEARS while the
    incredibly convoluted process for firing a teacher was worked through.
    The particular building they filmed in had 6 storeys and was only one of
    several such buildings, apparently all dedicated to "rubber rooms", in
    NYC. It was pretty clear then that the process for dismissing a teacher
    was WAY too complicated but apparently the union had the power to force
    that (or the administration lacked the intestinal fortitude to say no.
    And that had to be at least 20 years ago.

    That same item looked at a black high school senior and gave him a text
    to read. It was at the level of "See Tom. See Tom run." and that poor
    kid struggled mightily to get through the few lines he had to read. If
    THAT is the best the teachers can do, I don't see how they have any
    right to these preposterously complex dismissal procedures. Maybe if
    teachers actually TAUGHT the curriculum - and the curriculum was purged
    of woke nonsense - students would actually learn something. Of course
    they'd also have to bring back some discipline so that the mere whisper
    of a hint of getting sent to the principal's office actually meant
    something. If they don't do that, the kids will not even pay attention
    to what the teacher is saying and just daydream or get into mischief.

    You blame "woke nonsense" and incompetent educators for illiteracy???

    OK, groomer.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From moviePig@21:1/5 to All on Tue May 13 10:35:16 2025
    XPost: alt.journalism, alt.journalism.criticism, alt.news-media

    On 5/12/2025 11:53 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On May 12, 2025 at 3:55:35 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On 5/12/2025 4:52 PM, Rhino wrote:

    That same item looked at a black high school senior and gave him a text >>> to read. It was at the level of "See Tom. See Tom run." and that poor
    kid struggled mightily to get through the few lines he had to read. If >>> THAT is the best the teachers can do, I don't see how they have any
    right to these preposterously complex dismissal procedures. Maybe if
    teachers actually TAUGHT the curriculum - and the curriculum was purged >>> of woke nonsense - students would actually learn something. Of course
    they'd also have to bring back some discipline so that the mere whisper >>> of a hint of getting sent to the principal's office actually meant
    something. If they don't do that, the kids will not even pay attention >>> to what the teacher is saying and just daydream or get into mischief. >>>>

    You blame "woke nonsense" and incompetent educators for illiteracy???

    Well, it's a teacher's job to make kids literate. If they're not to blame for a generation of illiterate children, who is?

    It's like wondering who to blame when you hire a plumber to fix a leak and you
    come home to find your house flooded.

    If we're talking about literal 'literacy' (i.e., at the "See Tom run"
    level) I put it on a par with toilet-training: your kids don't get to
    leave your house without it. Thus, I see illiteracy as home-brewed, and unrelated to woke or otherwise substandard classrooms.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rhino@21:1/5 to moviePig on Tue May 13 22:21:44 2025
    XPost: alt.journalism, alt.journalism.criticism, alt.news-media

    On 2025-05-13 10:35 AM, moviePig wrote:
    On 5/12/2025 11:53 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On May 12, 2025 at 3:55:35 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On 5/12/2025 4:52 PM, Rhino wrote:
      That same item looked at a black high school senior and gave him a
    text
      to read. It was at the level of "See Tom. See Tom run." and that poor >>>>   kid struggled mightily to get through the few lines he had to
    read. If
      THAT is the best the teachers can do, I don't see how they have any >>>>   right to these preposterously complex dismissal procedures. Maybe if >>>>   teachers actually TAUGHT the curriculum - and the curriculum was
    purged
      of woke nonsense - students would actually learn something. Of course >>>>   they'd also have to bring back some discipline so that the mere
    whisper
      of a hint of getting sent to the principal's office actually meant
      something. If they don't do that, the kids will not even pay
    attention
      to what the teacher is saying and just daydream or get into mischief. >>>>>

    You blame "woke nonsense" and incompetent educators for illiteracy???

    Well, it's a teacher's job to make kids literate. If they're not to
    blame for
    a generation of illiterate children, who is?

    It's like wondering who to blame when you hire a plumber to fix a leak
    and you
    come home to find your house flooded.

    If we're talking about literal 'literacy' (i.e., at the "See Tom run"
    level) I put it on a par with toilet-training:  your kids don't get to
    leave your house without it.  Thus, I see illiteracy as home-brewed, and unrelated to woke or otherwise substandard classrooms.


    So you're saying your parents taught you to read and you didn't start
    school until you could at least read elementary school level books??

    Why do I find myself doubting you?

    --
    Rhino

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ubiquitous@21:1/5 to nobody@nowhere.com on Wed May 14 04:30:45 2025
    XPost: alt.journalism, alt.journalism.criticism, alt.news-media

    In article <vvvlb5$1s31e$1@dont-email.me>, nobody@nowhere.com wrote:
    On 5/12/2025 11:53 PM, BTR1701 wrote:

    Well, it's a teacher's job to make kids literate. If they're not to blame for
    a generation of illiterate children, who is?

    It's like wondering who to blame when you hire a plumber to fix a leak and you
    come home to find your house flooded.

    If we're talking about literal 'literacy' (i.e., at the "See Tom run"
    level) I put it on a par with toilet-training: your kids don't get to
    leave your house without it. Thus, I see illiteracy as home-brewed, and >unrelated to woke or otherwise substandard classrooms.

    Huh. I remember you being against home schooling...

    --
    Not a joke! Don't jump!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From moviePig@21:1/5 to Rhino on Wed May 14 11:32:56 2025
    XPost: alt.journalism, alt.journalism.criticism, alt.news-media

    On 5/13/2025 10:21 PM, Rhino wrote:
    On 2025-05-13 10:35 AM, moviePig wrote:
    On 5/12/2025 11:53 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On May 12, 2025 at 3:55:35 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com>
    wrote:

    On 5/12/2025 4:52 PM, Rhino wrote:
      That same item looked at a black high school senior and gave him
    a text
      to read. It was at the level of "See Tom. See Tom run." and that
    poor
      kid struggled mightily to get through the few lines he had to
    read. If
      THAT is the best the teachers can do, I don't see how they have any >>>>>   right to these preposterously complex dismissal procedures. Maybe if >>>>>   teachers actually TAUGHT the curriculum - and the curriculum was
    purged
      of woke nonsense - students would actually learn something. Of
    course
      they'd also have to bring back some discipline so that the mere
    whisper
      of a hint of getting sent to the principal's office actually meant >>>>>   something. If they don't do that, the kids will not even pay
    attention
      to what the teacher is saying and just daydream or get into
    mischief.


    You blame "woke nonsense" and incompetent educators for illiteracy???

    Well, it's a teacher's job to make kids literate. If they're not to
    blame for
    a generation of illiterate children, who is?

    It's like wondering who to blame when you hire a plumber to fix a
    leak and you
    come home to find your house flooded.

    If we're talking about literal 'literacy' (i.e., at the "See Tom run"
    level) I put it on a par with toilet-training:  your kids don't get to
    leave your house without it.  Thus, I see illiteracy as home-brewed,
    and unrelated to woke or otherwise substandard classrooms.


    So you're saying your parents taught you to read and you didn't start
    school until you could at least read elementary school level books??

    Why do I find myself doubting you?

    It's your m.o. Meanwhile...

    Some kids read as early as 3, with most not starting school until 6.
    Households that regularize reading to/with its kids (which imo should be *every* household) will automatically instill some tangible proficiency.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)