In article <vitflv$1tu05$1@dont-email.me>,
William Hyde <wthyde1953@gmail.com> wrote:

D wrote:

On Thu, 5 Dec 2024, William Hyde wrote:

D wrote:

On Wed, 4 Dec 2024, Scott Lurndal wrote:

Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> writes:

On 12/3/2024 7:59 PM, Bobbie Sellers wrote:

On 12/3/24 17:01, Lynn McGuire wrote:

???Climate Change over the past 4000 Years???

I have quite a bit of experience running forced flow and natural flow >>>>>> reactors.  Sol acts exactly like a natural flow reactor with both >>>>>> short
and long cycles of variability.

You have zero climate science background, so your experience with
non-nuclear reactors seems somewhat irrelevent.

Nonsense. Climate "science" is political. The real stuff is climate
science reduced to physics.

Let's try a little test, shall we?

What do you think is used to create climate models?

No cheating, no looking it up.  I want to know what you thought at the
time you wrote the above.

William Hyde

That models can be whipped up at will, based on the directions of the
people who are funding it. Climate gate is an excellent example of the
corruption in the field. It was probably just the tip of the iceberg.

That is not an answer to the question I asked.

Try again.

You do understand you're dealing with a politer Terry Austin, right? Or
perhaps Ted Holden.

--
My reviews can be found at http://jamesdavisnicoll.com/
My tor pieces at https://www.tor.com/author/james-davis-nicoll/
My Dreamwidth at https://james-davis-nicoll.dreamwidth.org/
My patreon is at https://www.patreon.com/jamesdnicoll

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)