Sysop: | Amessyroom |
---|---|
Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
Users: | 43 |
Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
Uptime: | 108:30:21 |
Calls: | 290 |
Files: | 905 |
Messages: | 76,683 |
“JK Rowling Details Cost Of Speaking Out On Trans Issue, Blasts NYT ‘Rewriting Of History’”
https://www.dailywire.com/news/jk-rowling-details-cost-of-speaking-out- on-trans-issue-blasts-nyt-rewriting-of-history
““Harry Potter” author and female rights activist JK Rowling blasted The
New York Times on Monday for the “rewriting of history” about
transgender activists’ vicious tactics, while Rowling outlined just how much she and others have suffered for speaking out for girls and women.”
"Rowling posted a screenshot of a Times article that suggests trans
activists are going to have to moderate their “unsparing criticism” of those who disagree with them, ever since Democrats lost the 2024
election and Americans are increasingly disagreeing with the trans agenda."
"“The rewriting of history begins,” Rowling wrote. “Opponents of gender ideology haven’t merely ‘endured unsparing criticism’. I haven’t simply
been told I ‘betrayed real feminism’ or received a few book-burning videos.”"
"“I’ve been sent thousands of threats of murder, rape and violence,” the
author outlined. “A trans woman posted my family’s home address with a bomb-making guide. My eldest child was targeted by a prominent trans
activist who attempted to doxx her and ended up doxxing the wrong young woman.”"
Incredibly sad.
Lynn
On Mon, 2 Dec 2024 15:12:09 -0600, Lynn McGuire
<lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> wrote:
“JK Rowling Details Cost Of Speaking Out On Trans Issue, Blasts NYT
‘Rewriting Of History’”
https://www.dailywire.com/news/jk-rowling-details-cost-of-speaking-out-on-trans-issue-blasts-nyt-rewriting-of-history
““Harry Potter” author and female rights activist JK Rowling blasted The
New York Times on Monday for the “rewriting of history” about
transgender activists’ vicious tactics, while Rowling outlined just how
much she and others have suffered for speaking out for girls and women.” >>
"Rowling posted a screenshot of a Times article that suggests trans
activists are going to have to moderate their “unsparing criticism” of >> those who disagree with them, ever since Democrats lost the 2024
election and Americans are increasingly disagreeing with the trans agenda." >>
"“The rewriting of history begins,” Rowling wrote. “Opponents of gender
ideology haven’t merely ‘endured unsparing criticism’. I haven’t simply
been told I ‘betrayed real feminism’ or received a few book-burning
videos.”"
"“I’ve been sent thousands of threats of murder, rape and violence,” the
author outlined. “A trans woman posted my family’s home address with a >> bomb-making guide. My eldest child was targeted by a prominent trans
activist who attempted to doxx her and ended up doxxing the wrong young
woman.”"
Incredibly sad.
As I have noted, wingnuts exist on /all/ sides.
What is strange is that the obvious solution -- four teams/leagues
instead of two -- does not appear to have occurred to anyone.
Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> writes:
On 12/3/24 08:40, Paul S Person wrote:
Actually a lot of statistics around the issue are simply speculative as >> are rumors of crimes done by Transgender people
in bathrooms belonging to any sex. Criminal men have been free
to enter women's toilets despite it being a crime.
Most of it is either political firewood (hatred/division) or
religious nutters pushing their vision of morality on the rest
of the country.
Back in the 80's, before they remodelled the facilities, one
would routinely find ladies in the men's room at the Hollywood
Bowl (just to avoid the hour-long lines for the few stalls
available in the ladies). Nobody complained. Nobody was
arrested. Nobody tried to make it illegal.
Unisex lavatories aren't uncommon in Europe and have been
for decades.
Much ado about nothing. Speak out in public, expect criticism.
Doxing et. al. is illegal and abhorrent regardless of the target or the reason behind it.
OTOH, verbal and written criticism should be expected when any
high-profile individual airs their opinion(s) on a controversial topic.
On 12/4/2024 10:42 AM, Scott Lurndal wrote:
BCFD 36 <bcfd36@cruzio.com> writes:
On 12/3/24 11:17, Scott Lurndal wrote:
Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> writes:
On 12/3/24 08:40, Paul S Person wrote:
Actually a lot of statistics around the issue are simply
speculative as
are rumors of crimes done by Transgender people
in bathrooms belonging to any sex. Criminal men have been free
to enter women's toilets despite it being a crime.
Most of it is either political firewood (hatred/division) or
religious nutters pushing their vision of morality on the rest
of the country.
Back in the 80's, before they remodelled the facilities, one
would routinely find ladies in the men's room at the Hollywood
Bowl (just to avoid the hour-long lines for the few stalls
available in the ladies). Nobody complained. Nobody was
arrested. Nobody tried to make it illegal.
I can remember seeing women in the restrooms of several sports stadiums
e.g. Stanford and Candlestick. I can also remember seeing a whole line
of men peeing under the railing and down the slope below the Stanford
stadium when there weren't enough restrooms.
No one seemed to care.
I don't think the debate about people with Y chromosomes competing
Unisex lavatories aren't uncommon in Europe and have been
for decades.
Much ado about nothing. Speak out in public, expect criticism.
Doxing et. al. is illegal and abhorrent regardless of the target or the >>>> reason behind it.
OTOH, verbal and written criticism should be expected when any
high-profile individual airs their opinion(s) on a controversial topic. >>>
against XX people is over yet. Consider that Serena Williams (I think)
who was #1 in women's tennis said that the #200 man in men's tennis
would beat her.
I do remember the Billy Jean King match with Bobby Riggs.
Bobby Riggs was 26 years older than Billy Jean King so it was not an
even match.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_the_Sexes_(tennis)
Lynn
On 04/12/2024 03:54, BCFD 36 wrote:
On 12/3/24 11:17, Scott Lurndal wrote:
Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> writes:
On 12/3/24 08:40, Paul S Person wrote:
Actually a lot of statistics around the issue are simply
speculative as
are rumors of crimes done by Transgender people
in bathrooms belonging to any sex. Criminal men have been free
to enter women's toilets despite it being a crime.
Most of it is either political firewood (hatred/division) or
religious nutters pushing their vision of morality on the rest
of the country.
Back in the 80's, before they remodelled the facilities, one
would routinely find ladies in the men's room at the Hollywood
Bowl (just to avoid the hour-long lines for the few stalls
available in the ladies). Nobody complained. Nobody was
arrested. Nobody tried to make it illegal.
I can remember seeing women in the restrooms of several sports
stadiums e.g. Stanford and Candlestick. I can also remember seeing a
whole line of men peeing under the railing and down the slope below
the Stanford stadium when there weren't enough restrooms.
No one seemed to care.
Unisex lavatories aren't uncommon in Europe and have been
for decades.
Much ado about nothing. Speak out in public, expect criticism.
Doxing et. al. is illegal and abhorrent regardless of the target or the
reason behind it.
OTOH, verbal and written criticism should be expected when any
high-profile individual airs their opinion(s) on a controversial topic.
I don't think the debate about people with Y chromosomes competing
against XX people is over yet. Consider that Serena Williams (I think)
who was #1 in women's tennis said that the #200 man in men's tennis
would beat her.
I have no idea what the hormone therapy a trans female takes does to
the muscle mass and strength she formerly possessed as a male.
I don't have detailed knowledge either.
But I think that regulating sports participation
ought to be left to the agencies that regulate
sports participation. Along with figuring out
what the purpose of sport is anyway.
In some countries - including mine - sport
has been used to glorify the government of
the day, which claims that athletes' successes
are demonstrations of the value of the
government's policy. But presumably it's
good for other things.