• TRAP (no spoilers)

    From moviePig@21:1/5 to All on Sun Nov 3 17:48:47 2024
    XPost: rec.arts.tv

    A father brings his 12-year-old daughter to a pop diva's concert,
    unaware that police have it targeted with a manhunt. TRAP (on MAX) is a
    PG-13 thriller from M. Night Shyamalan that defies credibility so often
    that tension never finds a foothold. Still, Shyamalan does know how to
    keep boredom at bay. Somewhat recommended,

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From BTR1701@21:1/5 to moviePig on Tue Nov 5 17:59:17 2024
    XPost: rec.arts.tv

    On Nov 3, 2024 at 2:48:47 PM PST, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:


    A father brings his 12-year-old daughter to a pop diva's concert,
    unaware that police have it targeted with a manhunt. TRAP (on MAX) is a PG-13 thriller from M. Night Shyamalan that defies credibility so often
    that tension never finds a foothold. Still, Shyamalan does know how to
    keep boredom at bay. Somewhat recommended,

    It was decent as a thriller but they threw any semblance of realism out the window to accomplish it.

    The idea that they could legally subject any adult male who was in attendance at the concert to forcible interrogation, literally pulling them out of the stands in front of their kids and ruining an experience that-- if the allusion to Taylor Swift concerts is accurate-- likely cost them many hundreds, if not more than a thousand dollars, and which their children would have been anticipating for the better part of a year and that they could do all this without repercussion, is laughable.

    I mean, it's a good chance that there could be cops, federal agents, lawyers, judges, etc. all in that group of 3000 men that they were lining up en masse
    at the exits and refusing to let them leave and forcing them into tents to be interrogated by FBI agents. Or just normal citizen who know their rights. Any or all of them could just say, "I'm invoking my 5th and 6th Amendment rights and refuse to answer questions from police." Then what? Did the FBI think they could continue to hold them prisoner? Even holding any of them up to that
    point without individual particularized suspicion opens them up to massive legal liability. Continuing to do so after they've invoked only compounds the size of the settlement the government will have to pay.

    The whole setup was a complete legal farce, but if you can suspend your disbelief over that, it was a decent enough movie.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From moviePig@21:1/5 to All on Tue Nov 5 14:14:27 2024
    XPost: rec.arts.tv

    On 11/5/2024 12:59 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Nov 3, 2024 at 2:48:47 PM PST, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:


    A father brings his 12-year-old daughter to a pop diva's concert,
    unaware that police have it targeted with a manhunt. TRAP (on MAX) is a
    PG-13 thriller from M. Night Shyamalan that defies credibility so often
    that tension never finds a foothold. Still, Shyamalan does know how to
    keep boredom at bay. Somewhat recommended,

    It was decent as a thriller but they threw any semblance of realism out the window to accomplish it.

    The idea that they could legally subject any adult male who was in attendance at the concert to forcible interrogation, literally pulling them out of the stands in front of their kids and ruining an experience that-- if the allusion
    to Taylor Swift concerts is accurate-- likely cost them many hundreds, if not more than a thousand dollars, and which their children would have been anticipating for the better part of a year and that they could do all this without repercussion, is laughable.

    I mean, it's a good chance that there could be cops, federal agents, lawyers, judges, etc. all in that group of 3000 men that they were lining up en masse at the exits and refusing to let them leave and forcing them into tents to be interrogated by FBI agents. Or just normal citizen who know their rights. Any or all of them could just say, "I'm invoking my 5th and 6th Amendment rights and refuse to answer questions from police." Then what? Did the FBI think they
    could continue to hold them prisoner? Even holding any of them up to that point without individual particularized suspicion opens them up to massive legal liability. Continuing to do so after they've invoked only compounds the size of the settlement the government will have to pay.

    The whole setup was a complete legal farce, but if you can suspend your disbelief over that, it was a decent enough movie.

    ...not to mention, from another angle, what king of loony mother could willingly send her child forth into such circumstances.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)