| Sysop: | Amessyroom |
|---|---|
| Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
| Users: | 43 |
| Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
| Uptime: | 97:19:04 |
| Calls: | 290 |
| Files: | 904 |
| Messages: | 76,468 |
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0ov66r02uh1k00a@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <vkr29m$s2kr$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The other 94 Female Time Ladies might have been
'Off-World' or dealing with The Common Peoples, maybe!!
Romana, Flavia ...
The 13th Doctor!
Bogus! The 13th Doctor looks like the 10th Doctor!
Methinks you need to take a trip to the opticians...
In article <vktoiq$1ilhg$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
Blueshirt wrote on 30/12/24 7:39 pm.
just give us some exciting adventures with The Doctor in time andIs that why you Irish sound so weird when you speak?? ;-P
space, or on Earth as the case may be! We'll only really need one
Time Lord around the place then.
unless you want him to have a bromance with the Master, which
doesn't bear thinking about.
No, we don't want any of that sort of thing here... I mean, the
Doctor and the Master are supposed to be enemies! Enemies getting
touchy and feely with each other is just wrong.
I have the feeling that your tongue is in your cheek. :)
As if!
Like Australians?-)
Daniel70 wrote:
Blueshirt wrote on 30/12/24 7:39 pm:
John Hall wrote:
Perhaps I should have said that Time Lords of either
gender are now few and far between. :)
Doctor Who isn't a soap opera. We don't need to be exploring
too much of what goes 'on' in the TARDIS,
Don't we??
Well in your case it doesn't matter either way... as you choose
not to find a way to watch any of the new episodes of Doctor Who!
Tons of stuff could have 'gone on' in the TARDIS by the time ABC
get the broadcasting rights to Doctor Who back... if it ever
does.
Is that why you Irish sound so weird when you speak?? ;-PI have the feeling that your tongue is in your cheek. :)
As if!
Strewth. Are you fair dinkum mate?
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0ov4tl58hif9g007@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
John Hall wrote:
unless you want him to have a bromance with the Master,
which doesn't bear thinking about.
No, we don't want any of that sort of thing here... I mean,
the Doctor and the Master are supposed to be enemies! Enemies
getting touchy and feely with each other is just wrong.
As we saw in the 1970s.
Did we see that sort of the thing in Doctor Who of the 1970's
Dave? Really? (Ooooh, Matron!!!) Well, I say down with that sort
of thing!!!
And so does Father Dougal...
Blueshirt wrote on 31/12/24 3:00 am:
The Doctor wrote:
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The 13th Doctor!
Bogus! The 13th Doctor looks like the 10th Doctor!
Methinks you need to take a trip to the opticians...
No, he just WANTS the 13th Doctor to look like the 10th Doctor
.... because Gobble-de-gook has "the HOTS" for the 10th
Doctor!!
Blueshirt wrote on 30/12/24 8:55 pm:
Daniel70 wrote:
Is that why you Irish sound so weird when you speak?? ;-P
Strewth. Are you fair dinkum mate?
More emphasis on the 'ew', please. Streeewwwth!!
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0ov6hpd3cofq001@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Bogus! The 13th Doctor looks like the 10th Doctor!
Methinks you need to take a trip to the opticians...
You need you reality check BS!
I did offer regenerations sequences from 12th to REAL 13th.
Fan made. To keep the Doctor Who fans that can't handle change
happy so the show works the way that they want it to.
But they're not part of the actual show... so irrelevant as those
sequences are nothing more than fan-fiction.
Jodie Whittaker's 13th Doctor IS part of the show, and she even
shows up in the revised version of "The War Games". So methinks
you will be going somewhere before she is!
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0ov6j1k559r4008@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
"Doctor Who" - as a show - likes its "fixed points" in time,
things that the Doctor can't alter. So yes, Gallifrey has
been destroyed and once again the Doctor is the last
surviving Time Lord... or so he believes.
However, I am sure that if an Executive Producer of Doctor
Who needs to change that to suit a future storyline, they
will.
ONce the Timeless Child is retconned.
Yeah, that really looks like it's going to happen Dave...
You clearly haven't been paying attention!
As every new run of Doctor Who episodes come out it's more
ingrained in to Doctor Who lore that Jodie's 13th Doctor
becomes. Which just goes to back-up the point that RTD made two
years ago when he said he wouldn't "un-write" anything that his
good friend [Chris Chibnall] had done. But of course, to some
people they thought RTD was just telling porkies and he'd be the
man to retcon Jodie Whittaker's 13th Doctor out of existence...
John Hall wrote:
In message <xn0ov6j1k559r4008@post.eweka.nl>, Blueshirt
<blueshirt@indigo.news> writes
John Hall wrote:
I'm sure there might once have been plenty of female Time
Lords, but AIUI the destruction of Gallifrey wiped out all
the Time Lords except for those who were off-planet, and
very few Time Lords other than the Doctor and the Master
ever seemed to go off-planet; they were an amazingly
insular race. And - again AIUI - the destruction of
Gallifrey made even going back to the planet before it was
destroyed impossible, even though that doesn't seem to
make any sense.
"Doctor Who" - as a show - likes its "fixed points" in time,
things that the Doctor can't alter. So yes, Gallifrey has
been destroyed and once again the Doctor is the last
surviving Time Lord... or so he believes.
However, I am sure that if an Executive Producer of Doctor
Who needs to change that to suit a future storyline, they
will.
It will be interesting to see who Anita Dobson's character in
S2/S15 actually is and where she's from, as it seems likely
that "Mrs Flood" is a female Time Lord. (My assumption is
based on her knowing what a TARDIS was.)
Given her name, I'd guess that rather than being a Time Lord
she's a descendant of Amy Pond / Melody Pond (River Song).
Hmmm... I think, that is what we're supposed to think!
Maybe I am trying to be too clever but that just seems too
obvious.
But RTD likes to be mischievous, so who knows?
I suppose if she's the daughter of River Song, she could be the
Doctor's daughter too (though that would pose a problem in
genetics!). No doubt she would have been told about the TARDIS.
I have a funny feeling that if it was something like that, those
Doctor Who YouTube channels will explode!!! :-)
Mickmane wrote:
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Festive fun with the 15th Doctor...and plenty of schmaltz.
You must have watched something other than I.
It was Christmas Day... and there was no singing!
A lot of the pre-episode hype featured Nicola Coughlan as Joy
but for me Anita was the better companion substitute. The
scenes with the Doctor and Anita were the real heart of this
episode.
That was the only nice bit in the whole episode.
I could have handled a whole episode of the Doctor & Anita...
Talking of which, if the 15th Doctor had a year to
hang-around in London I would have expected him to pop-in to
see Ruby whilst he was there. Especially as Ruby actually
had a cameo in the episode! So I found that a bit odd.
Or visit the 14th Doctor!
That would seem logical too, but Ruby would have been the most
obvious. Especially as Millie Gibson had filmed an 'insert' for
the episode anyway. So that could easily have been a scene of
the Doctor popping in to say Hi.
Some people might not have liked the ending, some people
might not have even noticed the sub-text, or cared... but
for a Christmas Day episode something like that was to be
expected, especially once we knew the story was about a
star. (Plus, the "no wonder there was no room at the inn"
line fore-shadowed this.)
The ending was predictable from the moment the poor woman
stood there outside with the glowing chest.
Overall, stupid story, no joy, no happy end. Time Hotel
dropping into the universe out of nowhere makes no sense
either.
Sub-text?
I must have missed any line about any inn.
It was a 'topical' joke from the Doctor in a busy hotel on
Christmas Day... but it played in to the eventuality of the
story.
Overall I'd rate "Joy to the World" 7/10.
2/10 for Anita.
Why don't they give this guy some proper Doctor Who stories?
So far, nothing really works out.
I somewhat agree... overall RTD has not done the 15th Doctor any
favours. Whilst Ncuti's episodes taken as a whole could have
been a lot stronger, especially with the Doctor's character. The
15th Doctor doesn't need to be crying all the time to show that
he cares.
Welcome back btw!
Blueshirt wrote on 31/12/24 3:00 am:
The Doctor wrote:No, he just WANTS the 13th Doctor to look like the 10th Doctor ....
In article <xn0ov66r02uh1k00a@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <vkr29m$s2kr$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The other 94 Female Time Ladies might have been
'Off-World' or dealing with The Common Peoples, maybe!!
Romana, Flavia ...
The 13th Doctor!
Bogus! The 13th Doctor looks like the 10th Doctor!
Methinks you need to take a trip to the opticians...
because Gobble-de-gook has "the HOTS" for the 10th Doctor!!
--
Daniel
Blueshirt wrote on 30/12/24 8:55 pm:
Daniel70 wrote:
Blueshirt wrote on 30/12/24 7:39 pm:
John Hall wrote:
Perhaps I should have said that Time Lords of either
gender are now few and far between. :)
Doctor Who isn't a soap opera. We don't need to be exploring
too much of what goes 'on' in the TARDIS,
Don't we??
Well in your case it doesn't matter either way... as you choose
not to find a way to watch any of the new episodes of Doctor Who!
But I've got The Good Guys here to help keep me informed!! ;-)
Tons of stuff could have 'gone on' in the TARDIS by the time ABC
get the broadcasting rights to Doctor Who back... if it ever
does.
One can live in HOPE, can't one??
More emphasis on the 'ew', please. Streeewwwth!!Is that why you Irish sound so weird when you speak?? ;-PI have the feeling that your tongue is in your cheek. :)
As if!
Strewth. Are you fair dinkum mate?
--
Daniel
Daniel70 wrote:
Blueshirt wrote on 31/12/24 3:00 am:
The Doctor wrote:No, he just WANTS the 13th Doctor to look like the 10th Doctor
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The 13th Doctor!
Bogus! The 13th Doctor looks like the 10th Doctor!
Methinks you need to take a trip to the opticians...
.... because Gobble-de-gook has "the HOTS" for the 10th
Doctor!!
Steady on old chap... it's a bit early in the day for that sort
of thing.
Although I think you'll find it was more Donna Noble's daughter
Rose that Dave had the "hots" for... :-)
The Doctor wrote on 31/12/24 2:21 am:
In article <vktoiq$1ilhg$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
Blueshirt wrote on 30/12/24 7:39 pm.
<Snip>
just give us some exciting adventures with The Doctor in time andIs that why you Irish sound so weird when you speak?? ;-P
space, or on Earth as the case may be! We'll only really need one
Time Lord around the place then.
unless you want him to have a bromance with the Master, which
doesn't bear thinking about.
No, we don't want any of that sort of thing here... I mean, the
Doctor and the Master are supposed to be enemies! Enemies getting
touchy and feely with each other is just wrong.
I have the feeling that your tongue is in your cheek. :)
As if!
Like Australians?-)
No, Gobble-de-gook, we Aussies don't sound anything like The Irish!!
--
Daniel
In article <xn0ov7jky11kpec000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
I did offer regenerations sequences from 12th to REAL 13th.
Fan made. To keep the Doctor Who fans that can't handle
change happy so the show works the way that they want it to.
But they're not part of the actual show... so irrelevant,
as those sequences are nothing more than fan-fiction.
More canon than anything Chibnall did.
Jodie Whittaker's 13th Doctor IS part of the show, and she
even shows up in the revised version of "The War Games". So
methinks you will be going somewhere before she is!
Bogus!
Given her name, I'd guess that rather than being a Time Lord she's a descendant of Amy Pond / Melody Pond (River Song). I suppose if she's
the daughter of River Song, she could be the Doctor's daughter too
(though that would pose a problem in genetics!). No doubt she would
have been told about the TARDIS.
On 01.01.25, John Hall <john_nospam@jhall.co.uk> wrote:
[Mrs. Flood]
Given her name, I'd guess that rather than being a Time Lord she's a
descendant of Amy Pond / Melody Pond (River Song). I suppose if she's
the daughter of River Song, she could be the Doctor's daughter too
(though that would pose a problem in genetics!). No doubt she would
have been told about the TARDIS.
Why would that be a problem in genetics, what did I forget?
I don't think she can be anyone who'd not notice a blue box standing
around randomly, and only drop her bags when it moves in or out.
--
Mickmane
On 01.01.25, John Hall <john_nospam@jhall.co.uk> wrote:
[Mrs. Flood]
Given her name, I'd guess that rather than being a Time Lord she's a
descendant of Amy Pond / Melody Pond (River Song). I suppose if she's
the daughter of River Song, she could be the Doctor's daughter too
(though that would pose a problem in genetics!). No doubt she would
have been told about the TARDIS.
Why would that be a problem in genetics, what did I forget?
I don't think she can be anyone who'd not notice a blue box standing
around randomly, and only drop her bags when it moves in or out.
In article <vl0jlu$2713k$3@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
Blueshirt wrote on 31/12/24 3:00 am:
The Doctor wrote:No, he just WANTS the 13th Doctor to look like the 10th Doctor ....
In article <xn0ov66r02uh1k00a@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <vkr29m$s2kr$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The other 94 Female Time Ladies might have been
'Off-World' or dealing with The Common Peoples, maybe!!
Romana, Flavia ...
The 13th Doctor!
Bogus! The 13th Doctor looks like the 10th Doctor!
Methinks you need to take a trip to the opticians...
because Gobble-de-gook has "the HOTS" for the 10th Doctor!!
I want REAL Doctor Who!
In article <vl0jlu$2713k$3@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
Blueshirt wrote on 31/12/24 3:00 am:
The Doctor wrote:No, he just WANTS the 13th Doctor to look like the 10th Doctor ....
In article <xn0ov66r02uh1k00a@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <vkr29m$s2kr$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The other 94 Female Time Ladies might have been
'Off-World' or dealing with The Common Peoples, maybe!!
Romana, Flavia ...
The 13th Doctor!
Bogus! The 13th Doctor looks like the 10th Doctor!
Methinks you need to take a trip to the opticians...
because Gobble-de-gook has "the HOTS" for the 10th Doctor!!
I want REAL Doctor Who!
WHAT do YOU, Binky, define as "REAL Doctor Who", Binky??
Daniel70 wrote:
Blueshirt wrote on 30/12/24 8:55 pm:
Daniel70 wrote:More emphasis on the 'ew', please. Streeewwwth!!
Is that why you Irish sound so weird when you speak?? ;-P
Strewth. Are you fair dinkum mate?
Streeeewwwth mate, where's me sunnies, I am getting blinded
here? It's so hot me sangers have all wilted... the missus
should have brought the esky. We'll have to get the Barbie out
and throw some snags on it instead mate, I need tucker.
Better?
In article <xn0ov7kmz12yo0r004@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Mickmane wrote:
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Overall I'd rate "Joy to the World" 7/10.
2/10 for Anita.
Why don't they give this guy some proper Doctor Who stories?
So far, nothing really works out.
I somewhat agree... overall RTD has not done the 15th Doctor any
favours. Whilst Ncuti's episodes taken as a whole could have
been a lot stronger, especially with the Doctor's character. The
15th Doctor doesn't need to be crying all the time to show that
he cares.
Welcome back btw!
Still highly rated in IMDB.
In message <Gt2NA2paczB@ATH>, Mickmane <ATH@kruemel.org> writes
On 01.01.25, John Hall <john_nospam@jhall.co.uk> wrote:
[Mrs. Flood]
Given her name, I'd guess that rather than being a Time Lord she's a
descendant of Amy Pond / Melody Pond (River Song). I suppose if she's
the daughter of River Song, she could be the Doctor's daughter too
(though that would pose a problem in genetics!). No doubt she would
have been told about the TARDIS.
Why would that be a problem in genetics, what did I forget?
The Doctor isn't human, for all that he looks it, so it seems unlikely
that he and a human could have progeny. If he has two hearts, then he
must be genetically radically different.
I don't think she can be anyone who'd not notice a blue box standing
around randomly, and only drop her bags when it moves in or out.
I must admit that my memory is so atrocious these days that I can't
remember anything about the episode in which she appeared. I've much
more chance of remembering episodes shown ten years ago - or sixty years
ago for that matter!
--
John Hall
"I look upon it, that he who does not mind his belly,
will hardly mind anything else."
Dr Samuel Johnson (1709-84)
The Doctor wrote on 1/1/25 3:00 am:^^^^^<-paedophile talker noted! ^^^^^<-Paedophile talker noted!
In article <vl0jlu$2713k$3@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
Blueshirt wrote on 31/12/24 3:00 am:
The Doctor wrote:No, he just WANTS the 13th Doctor to look like the 10th Doctor ....
In article <xn0ov66r02uh1k00a@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <vkr29m$s2kr$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The other 94 Female Time Ladies might have been
'Off-World' or dealing with The Common Peoples, maybe!!
Romana, Flavia ...
The 13th Doctor!
Bogus! The 13th Doctor looks like the 10th Doctor!
Methinks you need to take a trip to the opticians...
because Gobble-de-gook has "the HOTS" for the 10th Doctor!!
I want REAL Doctor Who!
WHAT do YOU, Binky, define as "REAL Doctor Who", Binky??
And please try to answer that question WITHOUT using any words
associated with the MALE SEX, Binky!!
--
Daniel
The Doctor wrote on 1/1/25 3:00 am:
In article <vl0jlu$2713k$3@dont-email.me>,Oh!! Of course! Sorry! I forgot. YOU, Gobble-de-gook, like MEN!!
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
Blueshirt wrote on 31/12/24 3:00 am:
The Doctor wrote:No, he just WANTS the 13th Doctor to look like the 10th Doctor ....
In article <xn0ov66r02uh1k00a@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <vkr29m$s2kr$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The other 94 Female Time Ladies might have been
'Off-World' or dealing with The Common Peoples, maybe!!
Romana, Flavia ...
The 13th Doctor!
Bogus! The 13th Doctor looks like the 10th Doctor!
Methinks you need to take a trip to the opticians...
because Gobble-de-gook has "the HOTS" for the 10th Doctor!!
I want REAL Doctor Who!
--
Daniel
Blueshirt wrote on 1/1/25 1:12 am:
Daniel70 wrote:Gee, I didn't know you had lived in Australia for some time!! ;-P
Blueshirt wrote on 30/12/24 8:55 pm:
Daniel70 wrote:More emphasis on the 'ew', please. Streeewwwth!!
Is that why you Irish sound so weird when you speak?? ;-P
Strewth. Are you fair dinkum mate?
Streeeewwwth mate, where's me sunnies, I am getting blinded
here? It's so hot me sangers have all wilted... the missus
should have brought the esky. We'll have to get the Barbie out
and throw some snags on it instead mate, I need tucker.
Better?
--
Daniel
Blueshirt wrote on 1/1/25 1:12 am:
Daniel70 wrote:
Blueshirt wrote on 30/12/24 8:55 pm:
Daniel70 wrote:
Is that why you Irish sound so weird when you speak??
;-P
Strewth. Are you fair dinkum mate?
More emphasis on the 'ew', please. Streeewwwth!!
Streeeewwwth mate, where's me sunnies, I am getting blinded
here? It's so hot me sangers have all wilted... the missus
should have brought the esky. We'll have to get the Barbie
out and throw some snags on it instead mate, I need tucker.
Better?
Gee, I didn't know you had lived in Australia for some time!!
Daniel70 wrote:
Blueshirt wrote on 1/1/25 1:12 am:
Daniel70 wrote:Gee, I didn't know you had lived in Australia for some time!!
Blueshirt wrote on 30/12/24 8:55 pm:
Daniel70 wrote:More emphasis on the 'ew', please. Streeewwwth!!
Is that why you Irish sound so weird when you speak??
;-P
Strewth. Are you fair dinkum mate?
Streeeewwwth mate, where's me sunnies, I am getting blinded
here? It's so hot me sangers have all wilted... the missus
should have brought the esky. We'll have to get the Barbie
out and throw some snags on it instead mate, I need tucker.
Better?
I used to watch Skippy!
On 28/12/2024 08:37, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 26/12/2024 15:40, Hornplayer9599 wrote:
On 12/26/2024 09:04, Blueshirt wrote:
[Snip]
A lot of the pre-episode hype featured Nicola Coughlan
as Joy
The fat woman was a moron.
I get a sneaking suspicion that you don't like fat birds Aggy?
I don't find obese women attractive. They're clinically unhealthy. I
don't find anorexically skinny women attractive either for the same
reason. There's nothing wrong with people thinking that, it's something >that's wrong with people who are fat or are skinny. They can easily fix
it by not eating so much.
There was good chemistry between the Doctor and Anita...I
was surprised that the Doctor didn't invite her to be the
new companion in the TARDIS
Then he'd be a bigger pervert than he is already. How old is
he again? 2000? 3000? How old was she? How can a relationship
with such an age gap be appropriate? Does he see her like a
human would see a pet hamster?
The Doctor is a dirty pervert! Imagine... playing Connect 4 and
Twister with a much younger girl. Deffo sexual grooming.
Ncuti Gatwa is a pervert as is Russell T Davies and Steven Moffat.
Sure, that possibility is still on the table for the season
proper, and I think that it would be a truly missed
opportunity if they don't have him swing back to the hotel
and bring her onboard.
He's nothing more than a degenerate tease, as well as a slut, a
a slag, and a whore.
Stop beating around the bush Aggy, tell us what your REALLY
think of him!
He's a pervert.
As for Joy, it seemed that, for the most part, she was there
"just to be there" until she started talking to the
briefcase at the end (for lack of a better description).
Other than that, there wasn't a whole lot for her to
do... even as filler material.
She was there to give morbidly obese people representation.
Now I realize that calling her fat is an insult to fat people.
Hmmm... you're being a bit shallow there. Nicola Coughlan could
No I'm not. Any good doctor would say the same as me, as would any
normal person.
have a lovely personality... as well as big tits.
That doesn't excuse her from making herself morbidly obese. And huge
enormous tits are not attractive. Katie Price looks repulsive. I don't >understand how people fall for the nonsense published in the tabloids.
The only reason for publishing pictures of women with big tits is
because photographs are only two dimensional and big tits provide the >illusion of standing out more from the pages. The same applies to film
and TV. And then you have Katie Price and her beach ball implants which
are totally unnecessary.
[Snip]
in last year's special, it looks like Gutwa drank about 50
cups of coffee before he went in front of the camera and
was completely wired on caffeine. Yes, part of that is the
pacing of a one episode story (which
You mean the pervert can't act in a serious manner. His entire
range is limited to slut, slag, tease, and whore.
I'm getting a sense of Déjà vu here...
It's the same perverted performance in everything he's in.
I've never been a fan of, preferring multi-episodic stories,
but they aren't going to change that anytime soon, so...).
But just get the Doctor to slow down just a bit, and things
won't feel so rushed, and there can be more time for
character development.
They don't want to develop characters, or science, or reason,
or logical and rational thinking. They want to sexually
indoctrinate and groom children by causing to act and behave
based on inappropriate and irrational feelings and emotions
which they are not permitted to resist. Look at how the
morbidly obese women could not resist committing suicide and
what it represents as a metaphor.
You say "morbidly obese"... I say cuddly.
No. It prefer to cuddle a cat or even a dog just as long as the dog
doesn't try to lick me.
But Anita was still better companion material, unfortunately the
Yes.
actress playing her wasn't in Bridgerton.
Like the Indian woman who played the moron from the previous Steven
Moffat episode?
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." -William Shatner
The True Doctor wrote:
On 26/12/2024 15:40, Hornplayer9599 wrote:
On 12/26/2024 09:04, Blueshirt wrote:
[Snip]
A lot of the pre-episode hype featured Nicola Coughlan
as Joy
The fat woman was a moron.
I get a sneaking suspicion that you don't like fat birds Aggy?
There was good chemistry between the Doctor and Anita...I
was surprised that the Doctor didn't invite her to be the
new companion in the TARDIS
Then he'd be a bigger pervert than he is already. How old is
he again? 2000? 3000? How old was she? How can a relationship
with such an age gap be appropriate? Does he see her like a
human would see a pet hamster?
The Doctor is a dirty pervert! Imagine... playing Connect 4 and
Twister with a much younger girl. Deffo sexual grooming.
Sure, that possibility is still on the table for the season
proper, and I think that it would be a truly missed
opportunity if they don't have him swing back to the hotel
and bring her onboard.
He's nothing more than a degenerate tease, as well as a slut, a
a slag, and a whore.
Stop beating around the bush Aggy, tell us what your REALLY
think of him!
As for Joy, it seemed that, for the most part, she was there
"just to be there" until she started talking to the
briefcase at the end (for lack of a better description).
Other than that, there wasn't a whole lot for her to
do... even as filler material.
She was there to give morbidly obese people representation.
Now I realize that calling her fat is an insult to fat people.
Hmmm... you're being a bit shallow there. Nicola Coughlan could
have a lovely personality... as well as big tits.
[Snip]
in last year's special, it looks like Gutwa drank about 50
cups of coffee before he went in front of the camera and
was completely wired on caffeine. Yes, part of that is the
pacing of a one episode story (which
You mean the pervert can't act in a serious manner. His entire
range is limited to slut, slag, tease, and whore.
I'm getting a sense of Déjà vu here...
I've never been a fan of, preferring multi-episodic stories,
but they aren't going to change that anytime soon, so...).
But just get the Doctor to slow down just a bit, and things
won't feel so rushed, and there can be more time for
character development.
They don't want to develop characters, or science, or reason,
or logical and rational thinking. They want to sexually
indoctrinate and groom children by causing to act and behave
based on inappropriate and irrational feelings and emotions
which they are not permitted to resist. Look at how the
morbidly obese women could not resist committing suicide and
what it represents as a metaphor.
You say "morbidly obese"... I say cuddly.
But Anita was still better companion material, unfortunately the
actress playing her wasn't in Bridgerton.
Daniel70 wrote:
The True Doctor wrote on 28/12/24 11:08 am:
[Snip]
Then he'd be a bigger pervert than he is already.
And Aggy knows everything Pervert related!!
Every subject needs an expert.
How old is he again? 2000? 3000? How old was she? How can a
relationship with such an age gap be appropriate?
Gee Whiz!! And this would be the first time The Doctor has had
the HOTS for one of the companions, wouldn't it?? (Rose + 10th
Doctor, anyone?? Amy + 11th Doctor??)
Don't forget the 13th Doctor and Yaz!
I think there was definitely something touchy-feely going on
there!
The True Doctor wrote on 28/12/24 11:08 am:
On 26/12/2024 15:40, Hornplayer9599 wrote:
On 12/26/2024 09:04, Blueshirt wrote:
Festive fun with the 15th Doctor...and plenty of schmaltz.
"Joy to the World" is probably one of the 15th Doctor's
strongest stories (so far) in terms of the actual story, with
Ncuti's performance being just right for this heart-warming
festive episode.
Yes this was, on the whole, a solid story. That being said, I'm not
Solid in like leaking like a sieve as if it were written by a 4 year
old child that thinks a sieve being made of solid materials can hold
water.
Are you regressing, Aggy?? I mean you used to post that it was written
by a six year old .... now you are suggesting a four year old Script-writter!!
expecting the best Who stories to take place during the Christmas
episodes...but this was a good one.
The least you can expect is for them to adhere to the basic laws of
physics
How well do you know 'the basic laws of physics', Aggy?? Do they really
cover Time Travel, ah la 'Doctor Who'??
<Snip>
The entre premise of a Time Hotel undermines the entire plot since
if you have enough energy to permit time travel why do you need to
make a new star?
Because you can, maybe!!
Why doesn't Villenguard have time travel technology of its own?
Why doesn't Earth have Time Travel Technology of its own??
<Snip>
Then he'd be a bigger pervert than he is already.
And Aggy knows everything Pervert related!!
<Snip>
How old is he again? 2000? 3000? How old was she? How can a
relationship with such an age gap be appropriate? Does he see her like
a human would see a pet hamster?
Gee Whiz!! And this would be the first time The Doctor has had the HOTS
for one of the companions, wouldn't it?? (Rose + 10th Doctor, anyone??
Amy + 11th Doctor??)
Yeah, 7/10 is a good call. Some of the *minor* things I would
also mention is that they got the year wrong at the end
(0001)...and...like
You think it should have been 6 or 4 BC instead?
Why only 4 digits? Are they insinuating that the world ends before
they year 9999?
Well, as The Doctor (9 or 10, was it??) HAS been to the End of The sun,
which would also have been the end of The Earth!!)
Or are they just trying to avoid AD to be racist to Christians?
How is the use of 'AD' racist to Christians, Aggy, when it literally
stands for AD .... abbreviation for Anno Domini : a Latin phrase meaning
"in the year of the Lord", which is used when referring to a year after
Jesus Christ was born:
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/ad
Why didn't the retards just use the Roman year instead? The 754th of
the foundation of Rome?
.... because the VAST majority of the population (which YOU claim they
have chased away) would not understand the difference!!
In message <xn0ov3g4p73jb9g001@post.eweka.nl>, Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> writes
Daniel70 wrote:
The True Doctor wrote on 28/12/24 11:08 am:
[Snip]
Then he'd be a bigger pervert than he is already.
And Aggy knows everything Pervert related!!
Every subject needs an expert.
How old is he again? 2000? 3000? How old was she? How can a
relationship with such an age gap be appropriate?
That would pretty much rule out any relationships for the Doctor, since female Time Lords are few and far between, unless you want him to have a bromance with the Master, which doesn't bear thinking about.
Daniel70 wrote:
John Hall wrote on 28/12/24 9:35 pm:
unless you want him to have a bromance with the Master, which
doesn't bear thinking about.
So why, oh, why did YOU make us think of it, John?? ;-P
Well, we've had a female Master and a male Doctor, plus a female
Doctor with a male Master... so romances couldn't be entirely
ruled out. As unlikely as they might seem to us now.
Maybe it's something RTD will throw in to the mix one day?!
The Doctor wrote:
In article <vkr29m$s2kr$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
John Hall wrote on 28/12/24 9:35 pm:
That would pretty much rule out any relationships for the
Doctor, since female Time Lords are few and far between,
How would we know?? I mean the few times we have seen the
High Council of The Time Lords, I'm sure I saw some Females.
Even if you didn't see any, some of the male Time Lords on the
High Council might become Time Ladies after their next
regeneration. (It's in the show - so it's canon!)
The other 94 Female Time Ladies might have been 'Off-World'
or dealing with The Common Peoples, maybe!!
Romana, Flavia ...
The 13th Doctor!
On 28/12/2024 10:11, Daniel70 wrote:
The True Doctor wrote on 28/12/24 11:08 am:
On 26/12/2024 15:40, Hornplayer9599 wrote:
On 12/26/2024 09:04, Blueshirt wrote:
Festive fun with the 15th Doctor...and plenty of schmaltz.
"Joy to the World" is probably one of the 15th Doctor's
strongest stories (so far) in terms of the actual story, with
Ncuti's performance being just right for this heart-warming
festive episode.
Yes this was, on the whole, a solid story. That being said, I'm not
Solid in like leaking like a sieve as if it were written by a 4 year
old child that thinks a sieve being made of solid materials can hold
water.
Are you regressing, Aggy?? I mean you used to post that it was written
by a six year old .... now you are suggesting a four year old
Script-writter!!
Even a 4 year old child understands gravity better than Steven Moffat.
You can't carry a fucking star with you in a briefcase and where does
the mass to make it come from? If you were able to do either you'd
already have the means to create limitless energy out of nothing so what >would you need a star for as an energy source?
The story was written by an imbecile. Explain the science instead of
using the episode to encourage people to commit suicide.
expecting the best Who stories to take place during the Christmas
episodes...but this was a good one.
The least you can expect is for them to adhere to the basic laws of
physics
How well do you know 'the basic laws of physics', Aggy?? Do they really
cover Time Travel, ah la 'Doctor Who'??
They teach you the basic laws of physics at school. Time travel is only >possible forwards in time. Doing that is easy since we do it every day
and while travelling at high speed or experiencing high gravity causes
it to happen faster. Travel backwards in time is shown to be impossible
in quantum field theory and only possible in general relativity in a
universe that contains or in which you can create closed time loops
which is not the one in which we live in. Travelling sideways in time,
ie. by tunnelling to another parallel universe might be possible but
you'd require more energy than this universe contains in order to do it
and you'd end up killing yourself in the process of going through a
wormhole, unless you can create some sort of teleportation mechanism
that doesn't dismantle the whole of your body piece by piece.
<Snip>
The entre premise of a Time Hotel undermines the entire plot since
if you have enough energy to permit time travel why do you need to
make a new star?
Because you can, maybe!!
What for? As a weapon? You've already got enough energy to wipe out the >entire universe if you can travel backwards in time.
Why doesn't Villenguard have time travel technology of its own?
Why doesn't Earth have Time Travel Technology of its own??
<Snip>
Earth did have time travel technology of its own in the year four
thousand and something.
Then he'd be a bigger pervert than he is already.
And Aggy knows everything Pervert related!!
I know that he is a pervert and how to spot them.
<Snip>
How old is he again? 2000? 3000? How old was she? How can a
relationship with such an age gap be appropriate? Does he see her like
a human would see a pet hamster?
Gee Whiz!! And this would be the first time The Doctor has had the HOTS
for one of the companions, wouldn't it?? (Rose + 10th Doctor, anyone??
Amy + 11th Doctor??)
We know now that RTD and Moffat are sick perverts. RTD being homosexual
is incapable (based on his own statements) of believable writing
heterosexual relationships as with saw with Rose and the 9th/10th
Doctor. Moffat can only write heterosexual relationships where the man
is depicted as a wimp and emasculate, and therefore these relationships
are not believable either but not as unbelievable as RTDs relationships.
We know that both of them are perverts as is Chris Chibnall who has an
alien frog entice a human being into having sex with it by impersonating
his wife. These woke imbeciles don't have a clue about morality. Look at >Wonder Woman 1984 where they has Gal Gadot rape a man whose body she
took over by implanting the consciousness of her decease boyfriend Steve >Trevor into it and suppressing that of the bodies original owner. That's >equivalent to spiking people's drinks with date rape drugs.
Yeah, 7/10 is a good call. Some of the *minor* things I would
also mention is that they got the year wrong at the end
(0001)...and...like
You think it should have been 6 or 4 BC instead?
Why only 4 digits? Are they insinuating that the world ends before
they year 9999?
Well, as The Doctor (9 or 10, was it??) HAS been to the End of The sun,
which would also have been the end of The Earth!!)
So Moffat is contradicting Davies' continuity then. Couldn't he have
erased the Timeless Child monster from canon instead?
Or are they just trying to avoid AD to be racist to Christians?
How is the use of 'AD' racist to Christians, Aggy, when it literally
Did you mean the lack of use of AD?
stands for AD .... abbreviation for Anno Domini : a Latin phrase meaning
"in the year of the Lord", which is used when referring to a year after
Jesus Christ was born:
So why did Moffat not say 0001 AD instead of just the year 0001?
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/ad
Why didn't the retards just use the Roman year instead? The 754th of
the foundation of Rome?
.... because the VAST majority of the population (which YOU claim they
have chased away) would not understand the difference!!
The idea of the show is to educate the viewers. Instead it's being
hijacked to encourage viewers to commit suicide if their parents die and
to allow their children to be abused by adults, especially ones who are
much older.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." -William Shatner
On 28/12/2024 10:35, John Hall wrote:
In message <xn0ov3g4p73jb9g001@post.eweka.nl>, Blueshirt
<blueshirt@indigo.news> writes
Daniel70 wrote:
The True Doctor wrote on 28/12/24 11:08 am:
[Snip]
Then he'd be a bigger pervert than he is already.
And Aggy knows everything Pervert related!!
Every subject needs an expert.
How old is he again? 2000? 3000? How old was she? How can a
relationship with such an age gap be appropriate?
That would pretty much rule out any relationships for the Doctor, since
female Time Lords are few and far between, unless you want him to have a
bromance with the Master, which doesn't bear thinking about.
There shouldn't be any romance for the Doctor in Doctor Who. He's
already been a father and grandfather so doesn't need to have a sexual
or romantic relationship with anyone unless it's to produce children,
which means with members of his own species.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." -William Shatner
On 30/12/2024 08:54, Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <vkr29m$s2kr$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
John Hall wrote on 28/12/24 9:35 pm:
That would pretty much rule out any relationships for the
Doctor, since female Time Lords are few and far between,
How would we know?? I mean the few times we have seen the
High Council of The Time Lords, I'm sure I saw some Females.
Even if you didn't see any, some of the male Time Lords on the
High Council might become Time Ladies after their next
regeneration. (It's in the show - so it's canon!)
No it isn't. Nothing after 2017 is canon, and Missy isn't canon either
unless the Master used her form as a disguise like his other disguises
which did not involve regeneration.
The other 94 Female Time Ladies might have been 'Off-World'
or dealing with The Common Peoples, maybe!!
Romana, Flavia ...
The 13th Doctor!
No! Doctor Who ended with Capaldi.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." -William Shatner
On 28/12/2024 10:35, John Hall wrote:
That would pretty much rule out any relationships for the
Doctor, since female Time Lords are few and far between,
unless you want him to have a bromance with the Master,
which doesn't bear thinking about.
There shouldn't be any romance for the Doctor in Doctor Who.
He's already been a father and grandfather so doesn't need to
have a sexual or romantic relationship with anyone unless it's
to produce children, which means with members of his own
species.
On 28/12/2024 08:37, Blueshirt wrote:
I get a sneaking suspicion that you don't like fat birds
Aggy?
I don't find obese women attractive. They're clinically
unhealthy. I don't find anorexically skinny women attractive
either for the same reason. There's nothing wrong with people
thinking that, it's something that's wrong with people who are
fat or are skinny. They can easily fix it by not eating so
much.
The Doctor is a dirty pervert! Imagine... playing Connect 4
and Twister with a much younger girl. Deffo sexual grooming.
Ncuti Gatwa is a pervert as is Russell T Davies and Steven
Moffat.
He's nothing more than a degenerate tease, as well as a
slut, a a slag, and a whore.
Stop beating around the bush Aggy, tell us what your REALLY
think of him!
He's a pervert.
She was there to give morbidly obese people representation.
Now I realize that calling her fat is an insult to fat
people.
Hmmm... you're being a bit shallow there. Nicola Coughlan
could have a lovely personality
No I'm not. Any good doctor would say the same as me, as would
any normal person.
... as well as big tits.
That doesn't excuse her from making herself morbidly obese.
And huge enormous tits are not attractive.
Katie Price looks repulsive.
You say "morbidly obese"... I say cuddly.
No. It prefer to cuddle a cat or even a dog just as long as
the dog doesn't try to lick me.
But Anita was still better companion material, unfortunately
the
Yes.
actress playing her wasn't in Bridgerton.
Like the Indian woman who played the moron from the previous
Steven Moffat episode?
The True Doctor wrote:
On 28/12/2024 10:35, John Hall wrote:
That would pretty much rule out any relationships for the
Doctor, since female Time Lords are few and far between,
unless you want him to have a bromance with the Master,
which doesn't bear thinking about.
There shouldn't be any romance for the Doctor in Doctor Who.
He's already been a father and grandfather so doesn't need to
have a sexual or romantic relationship with anyone unless it's
to produce children, which means with members of his own
species.
Strangely enough, I do agree with most of this. I don't like to
see romance in Doctor Who either... just tell a story about a
Time Lord having adventures in time and space and leave the soap
opera stuff to the actual soap operas!
Note to AGA: Try and refrain from posting stuff that I agree
with in 2025 please... I need something to get my teeth in to on
a boring cold morning with my Earl Grey. Thanks.
The idea of the show is to educate the viewers.
On 29/12/2024 09:28, Blueshirt wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
John Hall wrote on 28/12/24 9:35 pm:
unless you want him to have a bromance with the Master, which
doesn't bear thinking about.
So why, oh, why did YOU make us think of it, John?? ;-P
Well, we've had a female Master and a male Doctor, plus a female
Doctor with a male Master... so romances couldn't be entirely
ruled out. As unlikely as they might seem to us now.
Maybe it's something RTD will throw in to the mix one day?!
What if the woman is forced to regenerate while pregnant? The foetus
would die. That's why Time Lords cannot change gender and that along
with the Timeless Child monster is why Doctor Who ended in 2017.
In message <xn0p0bkg23wzork003@post.eweka.nl>, Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> writes
The True Doctor wrote:
There shouldn't be any romance for the Doctor in Doctor
Who. He's already been a father and grandfather so
doesn't need to have a sexual or romantic relationship
with anyone unless it's to produce children, which means
with members of his own species.
Strangely enough, I do agree with most of this. I don't like
to see romance in Doctor Who either... just tell a story
about a Time Lord having adventures in time and space and
leave the soap opera stuff to the actual soap operas!
And I agree with both of you on this. I suppose it all began
with the Tenth Doctor and Rose. (Though when Tom Baker and
Lalla Ward were in love IRL it did rather leak through into
their relationship in the show, though through no fault of the
writers.)
In message <Gt2NA2paczB@ATH>, Mickmane <ATH@kruemel.org> writes
On 01.01.25, John Hall <john_nospam@jhall.co.uk> wrote:
[Mrs. Flood]
Given her name, I'd guess that rather than being a Time Lord
she's a descendant of Amy Pond / Melody Pond (River Song). I
suppose if she's the daughter of River Song, she could be the
Doctor's daughter too (though that would pose a problem in
genetics!). No doubt she would have been told about the TARDIS.
Why would that be a problem in genetics, what did I forget?
The Doctor isn't human, for all that he looks it, so it seems
unlikely that he and a human could have progeny. If he has two
hearts, then he must be genetically radically different.
Daniel70 wrote:
Blueshirt wrote on 1/1/25 1:12 am:
Daniel70 wrote:Gee, I didn't know you had lived in Australia for some time!!
Blueshirt wrote on 30/12/24 8:55 pm:
Daniel70 wrote:More emphasis on the 'ew', please. Streeewwwth!!
Is that why you Irish sound so weird when you speak??
;-P
Strewth. Are you fair dinkum mate?
Streeeewwwth mate, where's me sunnies, I am getting blinded
here? It's so hot me sangers have all wilted... the missus
should have brought the esky. We'll have to get the Barbie
out and throw some snags on it instead mate, I need tucker.
Better?
I used to watch Skippy!
On 30/12/2024 08:54, Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <vkr29m$s2kr$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
John Hall wrote on 28/12/24 9:35 pm:
That would pretty much rule out any relationships for the
Doctor, since female Time Lords are few and far between,
How would we know?? I mean the few times we have seen the
High Council of The Time Lords, I'm sure I saw some Females.
Even if you didn't see any, some of the male Time Lords on the
High Council might become Time Ladies after their next
regeneration. (It's in the show - so it's canon!)
No it isn't. Nothing after 2017 is canon, and Missy isn't canon either
unless the Master used her form as a disguise like his other disguises
which did not involve regeneration.
On 28/12/2024 10:35, John Hall wrote:
In message <xn0ov3g4p73jb9g001@post.eweka.nl>, Blueshirt
<blueshirt@indigo.news> writes
Daniel70 wrote:
The True Doctor wrote on 28/12/24 11:08 am:
[Snip]
Then he'd be a bigger pervert than he is already.
And Aggy knows everything Pervert related!!
Every subject needs an expert.
How old is he again? 2000? 3000? How old was she? How can a
relationship with such an age gap be appropriate?
That would pretty much rule out any relationships for the Doctor,
since female Time Lords are few and far between, unless you want
him to have a bromance with the Master, which doesn't bear thinking
about.
There shouldn't be any romance for the Doctor in Doctor Who. He's
already been a father and grandfather so doesn't need to have a
sexual or romantic relationship with anyone unless it's to produce
children, which means with members of his own species.
Festive fun with the 15th Doctor...and plenty of schmaltz.
"Joy to the World" is probably one of the 15th Doctor's
strongest stories (so far) in terms of the actual story, with
Ncuti's performance being just right for this heart-warming
festive episode.
I liked the Time Hotel concept, where its visitors can open
doors to time portals (instead of rooms) and all of human
history is now available as mini-breaks for tourists. The
timey-wimey technobabble was par for the course too, but it
didn't overshadow the story.
There was a lot of throw-away nods and easter eggs throughout
the episode; the weeping angels were referenced, "mavity" once
again got a mention, there was a couple of "bigger on the
inside" lines and even a few TARDIS toys (etc.) In other words,
typical Steven Moffat.
A lot of the pre-episode hype featured Nicola Coughlan as Joy
but for me Anita was the better companion substitute. The scenes
with the Doctor and Anita were the real heart of this episode.
Talking of which, if the 15th Doctor had a year to hang-around
in London I would have expected him to pop-in to see Ruby whilst
he was there. Especially as Ruby actually had a cameo in the
episode! So I found that a bit odd.
Some people might not have liked the ending, some people might
not have even noticed the sub-text, or cared... but for a
Christmas Day episode something like that was to be expected,
especially once we knew the story was about a star. (Plus, the
"no wonder there was no room at the inn" line fore-shadowed
this.)
Overall I'd rate "Joy to the World" 7/10.
Festive fun with the 15th Doctor...and plenty of schmaltz.
"Joy to the World" is probably one of the 15th Doctor's
strongest stories (so far) in terms of the actual story, with
Ncuti's performance being just right for this heart-warming
festive episode.
I liked the Time Hotel concept, where its visitors can open
doors to time portals (instead of rooms) and all of human
history is now available as mini-breaks for tourists. The
timey-wimey technobabble was par for the course too, but it
didn't overshadow the story.
A lot of the pre-episode hype featured Nicola Coughlan as Joy
but for me Anita was the better companion substitute. The scenes
with the Doctor and Anita were the real heart of this episode.
Some people might not have liked the ending, some people might
not have even noticed the sub-text, or cared... but for a
Christmas Day episode something like that was to be expected,
especially once we knew the story was about a star. (Plus, the
"no wonder there was no room at the inn" line fore-shadowed
this.)
Overall I'd rate "Joy to the World" 7/10.
On 12/26/2024 09:04, Blueshirt wrote:
Festive fun with the 15th Doctor...and plenty of schmaltz.
"Joy to the World" is probably one of the 15th Doctor's
strongest stories (so far) in terms of the actual story, with
Ncuti's performance being just right for this heart-warming
festive episode.
Yes this was, on the whole, a solid story. That being said, I'm not >expecting the best Who stories to take place during the Christmas >episodes...but this was a good one.
I liked the Time Hotel concept, where its visitors can open
doors to time portals (instead of rooms) and all of human
history is now available as mini-breaks for tourists. The
timey-wimey technobabble was par for the course too, but it
didn't overshadow the story.
At this point we probably sub-consciously expect the timey-wimey stuff
to be there and we just mentally tone it down to keep it out of the way.
I did like the Time Hotel.
A lot of the pre-episode hype featured Nicola Coughlan as Joy
but for me Anita was the better companion substitute. The scenes
with the Doctor and Anita were the real heart of this episode.
There was good chemistry between the Doctor and Anita...I was surprised
that the Doctor didn't invite her to be the new companion in the TARDIS. >Sure, that possibility is still on the table for the season proper, and
I think that it would be a truly missed opportunity if they don't have
him swing back to the hotel and bring her onboard.
As for Joy, it seemed that, for the most part, she was there "just to be >there" until she started talking to the briefcase at the end (for lack
of a better description). Other than that, there wasn't a whole lot for
her to do...even as filler material.
Some people might not have liked the ending, some people might
not have even noticed the sub-text, or cared... but for a
Christmas Day episode something like that was to be expected,
especially once we knew the story was about a star. (Plus, the
"no wonder there was no room at the inn" line fore-shadowed
this.)
Overall I'd rate "Joy to the World" 7/10.
Yeah, 7/10 is a good call. Some of the *minor* things I would also
mention is that they got the year wrong at the end (0001)...and...like
in last year's special, it looks like Gutwa drank about 50 cups of
coffee before he went in front of the camera and was completely wired on >caffeine. Yes, part of that is the pacing of a one episode story (which
I've never been a fan of, preferring multi-episodic stories, but they
aren't going to change that anytime soon, so...). But just get the
Doctor to slow down just a bit, and things won't feel so rushed, and
there can be more time for character development.
--
Intelligence is no guarantee against being dead wrong.
--Carl Sagan
In article <vl3a6e$2ov5a$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 1/1/25 3:00 am:
In article <xn0ov7kmz12yo0r004@post.eweka.nl>, Blueshirt
<blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Mickmane wrote:
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
<Snip>
WHAT?? Mickmane is highly rated in IMDB, is he?? Well done,Overall I'd rate "Joy to the World" 7/10.
2/10 for Anita.
Why don't they give this guy some proper Doctor Who stories?
So far, nothing really works out.
I somewhat agree... overall RTD has not done the 15th Doctor
any favours. Whilst Ncuti's episodes taken as a whole could
have been a lot stronger, especially with the Doctor's
character. The 15th Doctor doesn't need to be crying all the
time to show that he cares.
Welcome back btw!
Still highly rated in IMDB.
Mickmane!!
You have yet to see Joy to the World!
The True Doctor wrote:
On 28/12/2024 10:27, Blueshirt wrote:
Don't forget the 13th Doctor and Yaz!
I think there was definitely something touchy-feely going on
there!
Chibnall at least had Whittaker tell Yaz she wasn't interested.
Sometimes what women say in public to their friends isn't what
they actually mean! So who knows what REALLY went on in that
TARDIS?
A lot of things happen behind closed doors yer know!
Chibnall's perversion comes from the episode where he had
an alien frog sexually abuse a man by impersonating the
form of his recently deceased wife, and Whittaker condoning
that abuse.
Er... okay.
The True Doctor wrote:
On 28/12/2024 10:35, John Hall wrote:
That would pretty much rule out any relationships for the
Doctor, since female Time Lords are few and far between,
unless you want him to have a bromance with the Master,
which doesn't bear thinking about.
There shouldn't be any romance for the Doctor in Doctor Who.
He's already been a father and grandfather so doesn't need to
have a sexual or romantic relationship with anyone unless it's
to produce children, which means with members of his own
species.
Strangely enough, I do agree with most of this. I don't like to
see romance in Doctor Who either... just tell a story about a
Time Lord having adventures in time and space and leave the soap
opera stuff to the actual soap operas!
Note to AGA: Try and refrain from posting stuff that I agree
with in 2025 please... I need something to get my teeth in to on
a boring cold morning with my Earl Grey. Thanks.
The True Doctor wrote:
On 30/12/2024 08:54, Blueshirt wrote:
Even if you didn't see any, some of the male Time Lords on
the High Council might become Time Ladies after their next
regeneration. (It's in the show - so it's canon!)
No it isn't. Nothing after 2017 is canon, and Missy isn't
canon either unless the Master used her form as a disguise
like his other disguises which did not involve regeneration.
Er... you must haver missed "Hell Bent". Is that canon then?
Just to freshen your memory... "Hell Bent" featured an on-screen
regeneration where a Time Lord changed sex (male to female),
plus the same regeneration also showed a Time Lord changing skin
colour.
This was in a televised episode of Doctor Who in 2015.
The 13th Doctor!
No! Doctor Who ended with Capaldi.
I'm pretty sure "Hell Bent" featured Peter Capaldi's Doctor...
In message <xn0p0bkg23wzork003@post.eweka.nl>, Blueshirt ><blueshirt@indigo.news> writes
The True Doctor wrote:
On 28/12/2024 10:35, John Hall wrote:
That would pretty much rule out any relationships for the
Doctor, since female Time Lords are few and far between,
unless you want him to have a bromance with the Master,
which doesn't bear thinking about.
There shouldn't be any romance for the Doctor in Doctor Who.
He's already been a father and grandfather so doesn't need to
have a sexual or romantic relationship with anyone unless it's
to produce children, which means with members of his own
species.
Strangely enough, I do agree with most of this. I don't like to
see romance in Doctor Who either... just tell a story about a
Time Lord having adventures in time and space and leave the soap
opera stuff to the actual soap operas!
Note to AGA: Try and refrain from posting stuff that I agree
with in 2025 please... I need something to get my teeth in to on
a boring cold morning with my Earl Grey. Thanks.
And I agree with both of you on this. I suppose it all began with the
Tenth Doctor and Rose. (Though when Tom Baker and Lalla Ward were in
love IRL it did rather leak through into their relationship in the show, >though through no fault of the writers.)
--
John Hall
"I look upon it, that he who does not mind his belly,
will hardly mind anything else."
Dr Samuel Johnson (1709-84)
John Hall wrote:
In message <xn0p0bkg23wzork003@post.eweka.nl>, Blueshirt
<blueshirt@indigo.news> writes
The True Doctor wrote:
There shouldn't be any romance for the Doctor in Doctor
Who. He's already been a father and grandfather so
doesn't need to have a sexual or romantic relationship
with anyone unless it's to produce children, which means
with members of his own species.
Strangely enough, I do agree with most of this. I don't like
to see romance in Doctor Who either... just tell a story
about a Time Lord having adventures in time and space and
leave the soap opera stuff to the actual soap operas!
And I agree with both of you on this. I suppose it all began
with the Tenth Doctor and Rose. (Though when Tom Baker and
Lalla Ward were in love IRL it did rather leak through into
their relationship in the show, though through no fault of the
writers.)
Yes. Doctor Who took on a bit of a soap opera feel to it when
the show returned in 2005. With a lot more focus on the
companion, their family and home life as well as romantic
feelings being thrown in to the mix.
I didn't really like it with Rose/Martha and the Tenth Doctor,
and I don't like it now. Although in fairness, Doctor Who was
very popular back then so the public must have liked it.
For me, there's enough soap operas on the TV, Doctor Who
shouldn't be a show about the companion having feelings for the
Doctor, or vice-versa... with only 45/50 minutes for an
episode of Doctor Who now that sort of stuff only takes away
from the actual story.
In message <vl4pdu$312ii$2@dont-email.me>, The True Doctor ><agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> writes
<big snip>
The idea of the show is to educate the viewers.
Boggle! That was how the idea for the show was sold to Sidney Newman
back in 1963, but it soon became clear that that was no more than a
fig-leaf to cover the fact that it was an exciting adventure that was
all about entertaining people rather than informing them. It's not
really even science fiction any more but fantasy. At its best, it can be
very good fantasy, but admittedly in recent years it hasn't been at its
best very often.
--
John Hall
"I look upon it, that he who does not mind his belly,
will hardly mind anything else."
Dr Samuel Johnson (1709-84)
The True Doctor wrote on 2/1/25 12:24 pm:
On 29/12/2024 09:28, Blueshirt wrote:It seems to me that our (male) Doctors have not all been the same size
Daniel70 wrote:
John Hall wrote on 28/12/24 9:35 pm:
unless you want him to have a bromance with the Master, which
doesn't bear thinking about.
So why, oh, why did YOU make us think of it, John?? ;-P
Well, we've had a female Master and a male Doctor, plus a female
Doctor with a male Master... so romances couldn't be entirely
ruled out. As unlikely as they might seem to us now.
Maybe it's something RTD will throw in to the mix one day?!
What if the woman is forced to regenerate while pregnant? The foetus
would die. That's why Time Lords cannot change gender and that along
with the Timeless Child monster is why Doctor Who ended in 2017.
and shape.
What happens to that extra matter if The Doctor regenerates into a
smaller body?? Or vice-versa??
If (whatever) can happen in a Male --> Male transition, why can't
similar happen in a Male --> Female transition or in a Female -> Male >transition??
--
Daniel
Blueshirt wrote on 2/1/25 5:15 am:
Daniel70 wrote:AH!! Bloody Skippy!! I think I was busy watching 'The Jetsons' when
Blueshirt wrote on 1/1/25 1:12 am:
Daniel70 wrote:Gee, I didn't know you had lived in Australia for some time!!
Blueshirt wrote on 30/12/24 8:55 pm:
Daniel70 wrote:More emphasis on the 'ew', please. Streeewwwth!!
Is that why you Irish sound so weird when you speak??
;-P
Strewth. Are you fair dinkum mate?
Streeeewwwth mate, where's me sunnies, I am getting blinded
here? It's so hot me sangers have all wilted... the missus
should have brought the esky. We'll have to get the Barbie
out and throw some snags on it instead mate, I need tucker.
Better?
I used to watch Skippy!
'Skippy' was on!
--
Daniel
The Doctor wrote on 2/1/25 3:00 am:^^^^^<-Paedophile talker noted
In article <vl3a6e$2ov5a$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel70
<daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 1/1/25 3:00 am:
In article <xn0ov7kmz12yo0r004@post.eweka.nl>, Blueshirt
<blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Mickmane wrote:
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
<Snip>
WHAT?? Mickmane is highly rated in IMDB, is he?? Well done,Overall I'd rate "Joy to the World" 7/10.
2/10 for Anita.
Why don't they give this guy some proper Doctor Who stories?
So far, nothing really works out.
I somewhat agree... overall RTD has not done the 15th Doctor
any favours. Whilst Ncuti's episodes taken as a whole could
have been a lot stronger, especially with the Doctor's
character. The 15th Doctor doesn't need to be crying all the
time to show that he cares.
Welcome back btw!
Still highly rated in IMDB.
Mickmane!!
You have yet to see Joy to the World!
Why, Binky?? How will my seeing 'Joy to the World' effect whether Mike
mane is highly rated on IMDB or not??
--
Daniel
In article <vl5nvg$39nb6$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The True Doctor wrote on 2/1/25 12:27 pm:
On 30/12/2024 08:54, Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <vkr29m$s2kr$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel70Â
<daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
John Hall wrote on 28/12/24 9:35 pm:
That would pretty much rule out any relationships for
the Doctor, since female Time Lords are few and far
between,
How would we know?? I mean the few times we have seen the
High Council of The Time Lords, I'm sure I saw some
Females.
Even if you didn't see any, some of the male Time Lords on the
High Council might become Time Ladies after their next
regeneration. (It's in the show - so it's canon!)
No it isn't. Nothing after 2017 is canon, and Missy isn't canon
either unless the Master used her form as a disguise like his
other disguises which did not involve regeneration.
In which Doctor-period did we see a Gualifreyan General walk off
screen and change sex (from M -> F or F -> M)??
Eleventh Doctor, I think. So the suggestion was there WITH-IN
Aggy's 'Doctor Who ended in 2017' time frame. Even before The
Master became Missy!!
The Doctor's Wife is what you are looking for.
In article <vl5ndd$39kjf$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The True Doctor wrote on 2/1/25 12:24 pm:
On 29/12/2024 09:28, Blueshirt wrote:It seems to me that our (male) Doctors have not all been the same
Daniel70 wrote:
John Hall wrote on 28/12/24 9:35 pm:
unless you want him to have a bromance with the Master,
which doesn't bear thinking about.
So why, oh, why did YOU make us think of it, John?? ;-P
Well, we've had a female Master and a male Doctor, plus a
female Doctor with a male Master... so romances couldn't be
entirely ruled out. As unlikely as they might seem to us now.
Maybe it's something RTD will throw in to the mix one day?!
What if the woman is forced to regenerate while pregnant? The
foetus would die. That's why Time Lords cannot change gender and
that along with the Timeless Child monster is why Doctor Who
ended in 2017.
size and shape.
What happens to that extra matter if The Doctor regenerates into a
smaller body?? Or vice-versa??
If (whatever) can happen in a Male --> Male transition, why can't
similar happen in a Male --> Female transition or in a Female ->
Male transition??
Bogus their Neil Gaiman!
The True Doctor wrote on 2/1/25 12:22 pm:
On 28/12/2024 10:35, John Hall wrote:But (RL) isn't the basic purpose of Sexual Intercourse (forget Rape,
In message <xn0ov3g4p73jb9g001@post.eweka.nl>, Blueshirt
<blueshirt@indigo.news> writes
Daniel70 wrote:
The True Doctor wrote on 28/12/24 11:08 am:
[Snip]
Then he'd be a bigger pervert than he is already.
And Aggy knows everything Pervert related!!
Every subject needs an expert.
How old is he again? 2000? 3000? How old was she? How can a
relationship with such an age gap be appropriate?
That would pretty much rule out any relationships for the Doctor,
since female Time Lords are few and far between, unless you
want him to have a bromance with the Master, which doesn't bear
thinking about.
There shouldn't be any romance for the Doctor in Doctor Who. He's
already been a father and grandfather so doesn't need to have a
sexual or romantic relationship with anyone unless it's to produce
children, which means with members of his own species.
etc.),
yet WE Humans do it .... over and over again, just for Pleasure??--
Why one Rule for RL and another Rule for SF/TV??
In article <vl5pvd$3a35q$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 2/1/25 3:00 am:^^^^^<-Paedophile talker noted
In article <vl3a6e$2ov5a$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel70
<daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 1/1/25 3:00 am:
In article <xn0ov7kmz12yo0r004@post.eweka.nl>, Blueshirt
<blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Mickmane wrote:
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
<Snip>
WHAT?? Mickmane is highly rated in IMDB, is he?? Well done,Overall I'd rate "Joy to the World" 7/10.
2/10 for Anita.
Why don't they give this guy some proper Doctor Who stories?
So far, nothing really works out.
I somewhat agree... overall RTD has not done the 15th Doctor
any favours. Whilst Ncuti's episodes taken as a whole could
have been a lot stronger, especially with the Doctor's
character. The 15th Doctor doesn't need to be crying all the
time to show that he cares.
Welcome back btw!
Still highly rated in IMDB.
Mickmane!!
You have yet to see Joy to the World!
Why, Binky?? How will my seeing 'Joy to the World' effect whether Mike
mane is highly rated on IMDB or not??
Blueshirt wrote on 2/1/25 5:15 am:
Daniel70 wrote:
Gee, I didn't know you had lived in Australia for some
time!!
I used to watch Skippy!
AH!! Bloody Skippy!! I think I was busy watching 'The Jetsons'
when 'Skippy' was on!
The True Doctor wrote on 2/1/25 12:24 pm:
What if the woman is forced to regenerate while pregnant?
The foetus would die. That's why Time Lords cannot change
gender and that along with the Timeless Child monster is
why Doctor Who ended in 2017.
It seems to me that our (male) Doctors have not all been the
same size and shape.
What happens to that extra matter if The Doctor regenerates
into a smaller body?? Or vice-versa??
If (whatever) can happen in a Male --> Male transition, why
can't similar happen in a Male --> Female transition or in a
Female -> Male transition??
Thinking about it, RADW is actually missing a Good Doctor...
We've a Doctor, a True Doctor and a Last Doctor.
On 1/2/2025 02:47, Blueshirt wrote:
Thinking about it, RADW is actually missing a Good Doctor...
We've a Doctor, a True Doctor and a Last Doctor.
I am going to be presenting my dissertation (Abnormal
Psychology) this spring. By May, I might be an Actual Doctor.
Will that work?
That's why Time Lords cannot change gender and that
along with the Timeless Child monster is why Doctor Who
ended in 2017.
Yes, I think you've said as much once or twice...
On 1/2/2025 02:47, Blueshirt wrote:
Thinking about it, RADW is actually missing a Good Doctor...
We've a Doctor, a True Doctor and a Last Doctor.
I am going to be presenting my dissertation (Abnormal Psychology) this spring. By May, I might be an *Actual* Doctor. Will that work?
The True Doctor wrote on 2/1/25 12:24 pm:
On 29/12/2024 09:28, Blueshirt wrote:It seems to me that our (male) Doctors have not all been the same size
Daniel70 wrote:
John Hall wrote on 28/12/24 9:35 pm:
unless you want him to have a bromance with the Master, which
doesn't bear thinking about.
So why, oh, why did YOU make us think of it, John?? ;-P
Well, we've had a female Master and a male Doctor, plus a female
Doctor with a male Master... so romances couldn't be entirely
ruled out. As unlikely as they might seem to us now.
Maybe it's something RTD will throw in to the mix one day?!
What if the woman is forced to regenerate while pregnant? The foetus
would die. That's why Time Lords cannot change gender and that along
with the Timeless Child monster is why Doctor Who ended in 2017.
and shape.
What happens to that extra matter if The Doctor regenerates into a
smaller body?? Or vice-versa??
If (whatever) can happen in a Male --> Male transition, why can't
similar happen in a Male --> Female transition or in a Female -> Male transition??
In article <vl5ndd$39kjf$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The True Doctor wrote on 2/1/25 12:24 pm:
On 29/12/2024 09:28, Blueshirt wrote:It seems to me that our (male) Doctors have not all been the same size
Daniel70 wrote:
John Hall wrote on 28/12/24 9:35 pm:
unless you want him to have a bromance with the Master, which
doesn't bear thinking about.
So why, oh, why did YOU make us think of it, John?? ;-P
Well, we've had a female Master and a male Doctor, plus a female
Doctor with a male Master... so romances couldn't be entirely
ruled out. As unlikely as they might seem to us now.
Maybe it's something RTD will throw in to the mix one day?!
What if the woman is forced to regenerate while pregnant? The foetus
would die. That's why Time Lords cannot change gender and that along
with the Timeless Child monster is why Doctor Who ended in 2017.
and shape.
What happens to that extra matter if The Doctor regenerates into a
smaller body?? Or vice-versa??
If (whatever) can happen in a Male --> Male transition, why can't
similar happen in a Male --> Female transition or in a Female -> Male
transition??
Bogus their Neil Gaiman!
Daniel70 wrote:
The True Doctor wrote on 2/1/25 12:24 pm:
It seems to me that our (male) Doctors have not all been the
What if the woman is forced to regenerate while pregnant?
The foetus would die. That's why Time Lords cannot change
gender and that along with the Timeless Child monster is
why Doctor Who ended in 2017.
same size and shape.
What happens to that extra matter if The Doctor regenerates
into a smaller body?? Or vice-versa??
If (whatever) can happen in a Male --> Male transition, why
can't similar happen in a Male --> Female transition or in a
Female -> Male transition??
The real question is... if a female Time Lord regenerates in to
a male Time Lord, do they regenerate wearing her knickers and a
Bra?
It's these important questions that the show should be dealing
with, not messing around with "mavity".
IMO of course... ;-)
In article <wa+GRWEwKncnFwwF@jhall_nospamxx.co.uk>,
John Hall <john@jhall.co.uk> wrote:
In message <xn0ov66r02uh1k00a@post.eweka.nl>, Blueshirt
<blueshirt@indigo.news> writes
The Doctor wrote:
In article <vkr29m$s2kr$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
John Hall wrote on 28/12/24 9:35 pm:
That would pretty much rule out any relationships for the
Doctor, since female Time Lords are few and far between,
How would we know?? I mean the few times we have seen the
High Council of The Time Lords, I'm sure I saw some Females.
Even if you didn't see any, some of the male Time Lords on the
High Council might become Time Ladies after their next
regeneration. (It's in the show - so it's canon!)
The other 94 Female Time Ladies might have been 'Off-World'
or dealing with The Common Peoples, maybe!!
Romana, Flavia ...
The 13th Doctor!
I'm sure there might once have been plenty of female Time Lords, but
AIUI the destruction of Gallifrey wiped out all the Time Lords except
for those who were off-planet, and very few Time Lords other than the
Doctor and the Master ever seemed to go off-planet; they were an
amazingly insular race. And - again AIUI - the destruction of Gallifrey
made even going back to the planet before it was destroyed impossible,
even though that doesn't seem to make any sense.
The whole reason why to retcon the timeless Child!
John Hall wrote:
I'm sure there might once have been plenty of female Time
Lords, but AIUI the destruction of Gallifrey wiped out all the
Time Lords except for those who were off-planet, and very few
Time Lords other than the Doctor and the Master ever seemed to
go off-planet; they were an amazingly insular race. And -
again AIUI - the destruction of Gallifrey made even going back
to the planet before it was destroyed impossible, even though
that doesn't seem to make any sense.
"Doctor Who" - as a show - likes its "fixed points" in time,
things that the Doctor can't alter. So yes, Gallifrey has been
destroyed and once again the Doctor is the last surviving Time
Lord... or so he believes.
However, I am sure that if an Executive Producer of Doctor Who
needs to change that to suit a future storyline, they will.
It will be interesting to see who Anita Dobson's character in
S2/S15 actually is and where she's from, as it seems likely that
"Mrs Flood" is a female Time Lord. (My assumption is based on
her knowing what a TARDIS was.) Maybe she was off-planet when
Gallifrey was destroyed, or we may get some timey-wimey answer
that is was only kind-of destroyed and working together herself
and the Doctor can get it back, or something... who knows? But
in Doctor Who, like in comics, things don't always stay dead...
even planets!
In article <vl4q1f$312ii$6@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 30/12/2024 08:54, Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <vkr29m$s2kr$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
John Hall wrote on 28/12/24 9:35 pm:
That would pretty much rule out any relationships for the
Doctor, since female Time Lords are few and far between,
How would we know?? I mean the few times we have seen the
High Council of The Time Lords, I'm sure I saw some Females.
Even if you didn't see any, some of the male Time Lords on the
High Council might become Time Ladies after their next
regeneration. (It's in the show - so it's canon!)
No it isn't. Nothing after 2017 is canon, and Missy isn't canon either
unless the Master used her form as a disguise like his other disguises
which did not involve regeneration.
The other 94 Female Time Ladies might have been 'Off-World'
or dealing with The Common Peoples, maybe!!
Romana, Flavia ...
The 13th Doctor!
No! Doctor Who ended with Capaldi.
The 13th Doctor looks like the 10th Doctor. The REAL 13th Doctor!!
The True Doctor wrote:
On 02/01/2025 09:48, Daniel70 wrote:
It seems to me that our (male) Doctors have not all been the same size
and shape.
What happens to that extra matter if The Doctor regenerates into a
smaller body?? Or vice-versa??
If (whatever) can happen in a Male --> Male transition, why can't
similar happen in a Male --> Female transition or in a Female -> Male
transition??
That is tantamount to condoning abortion at all stages of pregnancy.
What about the life of the unborn child?
Abortions are deliberate. This is more like acknowledging that
miscarriages can happen at all stages of pregnancy.
OTOH we don’t even know for certain if Gallifreyan women do
get pregnant. What if they lay eggs instead?
The True Doctor wrote:
On 30/12/2024 08:54, Blueshirt wrote:
Even if you didn't see any, some of the male Time Lords on
the High Council might become Time Ladies after their next
regeneration. (It's in the show - so it's canon!)
No it isn't. Nothing after 2017 is canon, and Missy isn't
canon either unless the Master used her form as a disguise
like his other disguises which did not involve regeneration.
Er... you must haver missed "Hell Bent". Is that canon then?
Just to freshen your memory... "Hell Bent" featured an on-screen
regeneration where a Time Lord changed sex (male to female),
plus the same regeneration also showed a Time Lord changing skin
colour.
This was in a televised episode of Doctor Who in 2015.
The 13th Doctor!
No! Doctor Who ended with Capaldi.
I'm pretty sure "Hell Bent" featured Peter Capaldi's Doctor...
The True Doctor wrote on 2/1/25 12:27 pm:
On 30/12/2024 08:54, Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <vkr29m$s2kr$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
John Hall wrote on 28/12/24 9:35 pm:
That would pretty much rule out any relationships for the
Doctor, since female Time Lords are few and far between,
How would we know?? I mean the few times we have seen the
High Council of The Time Lords, I'm sure I saw some Females.
Even if you didn't see any, some of the male Time Lords on the
High Council might become Time Ladies after their next
regeneration. (It's in the show - so it's canon!)
No it isn't. Nothing after 2017 is canon, and Missy isn't canon either
unless the Master used her form as a disguise like his other disguises
which did not involve regeneration.
In which Doctor-period did we see a Gualifreyan General walk off screen
and change sex (from M -> F or F -> M)??
Eleventh Doctor, I think. So the suggestion was there WITH-IN Aggy's
'Doctor Who ended in 2017' time frame. Even before The Master became
Missy!!
In message <vl4pdu$312ii$2@dont-email.me>, The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> writes
<big snip>
The idea of the show is to educate the viewers.
Boggle! That was how the idea for the show was sold to Sidney Newman
back in 1963, but it soon became clear that that was no more than a fig-
leaf to cover the fact that it was an exciting adventure that was all
about entertaining people rather than informing them. It's not really
even science fiction any more but fantasy. At its best, it can be very
good fantasy, but admittedly in recent years it hasn't been at its best
very often.
The True Doctor wrote:
Fantasy has self consistent logical rules which have to
be followed and doesn't contravene basic laws of science
without a believable explanation.
You must have some very boring fantasies!
The Doctor wrote on 2/1/25 11:19 pm:
In article <vl5nvg$39nb6$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel70
<daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The True Doctor wrote on 2/1/25 12:27 pm:
On 30/12/2024 08:54, Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <vkr29m$s2kr$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel70Â
<daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
John Hall wrote on 28/12/24 9:35 pm:
That would pretty much rule out any relationships for
the Doctor, since female Time Lords are few and far
between,
How would we know?? I mean the few times we have seen the
High Council of The Time Lords, I'm sure I saw some
Females.
Even if you didn't see any, some of the male Time Lords on the
High Council might become Time Ladies after their next
regeneration. (It's in the show - so it's canon!)
No it isn't. Nothing after 2017 is canon, and Missy isn't canon
either unless the Master used her form as a disguise like his
other disguises which did not involve regeneration.
In which Doctor-period did we see a Gualifreyan General walk off
screen and change sex (from M -> F or F -> M)??
Eleventh Doctor, I think. So the suggestion was there WITH-IN
Aggy's 'Doctor Who ended in 2017' time frame. Even before The
Master became Missy!!
The Doctor's Wife is what you are looking for.
Am I??
--
Daniel
The Doctor wrote on 2/1/25 11:21 pm:^^^^^<-Paedophile Talker noted!
In article <vl5pvd$3a35q$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 2/1/25 3:00 am:^^^^^<-Paedophile talker noted
In article <vl3a6e$2ov5a$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel70
<daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 1/1/25 3:00 am:
In article <xn0ov7kmz12yo0r004@post.eweka.nl>, Blueshirt
<blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Mickmane wrote:
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
<Snip>
WHAT?? Mickmane is highly rated in IMDB, is he?? Well done,Overall I'd rate "Joy to the World" 7/10.
2/10 for Anita.
Why don't they give this guy some proper Doctor Who stories?
So far, nothing really works out.
I somewhat agree... overall RTD has not done the 15th Doctor
any favours. Whilst Ncuti's episodes taken as a whole could
have been a lot stronger, especially with the Doctor's
character. The 15th Doctor doesn't need to be crying all the
time to show that he cares.
Welcome back btw!
Still highly rated in IMDB.
Mickmane!!
You have yet to see Joy to the World!
Why, Binky?? How will my seeing 'Joy to the World' effect whether Mike
mane is highly rated on IMDB or not??
Is that question to difficult for YOU, Binky??
--
Daniel
Binky bleated:
In article <vl5ndd$39kjf$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
It seems to me that our (male) Doctors have not all been the same size
and shape.
What happens to that extra matter if The Doctor regenerates into a
smaller body?? Or vice-versa??
If (whatever) can happen in a Male --> Male transition, why can't
similar happen in a Male --> Female transition or in a Female -> Male
transition??
Bogus their Neil Gaiman!
What is bogussing and why do you want Daniel to do it to
somebody’s Neil Gaiman? (How many Neil Gaimans are there
anyway?)
--
solar penguin
PS. Or is the right plural Gaimen?
Daniel70 wrote on 2/1/25 9:07 pm:
The True Doctor wrote on 2/1/25 12:22 pm:
On 28/12/2024 10:35, John Hall wrote:But (RL) isn't the basic purpose of Sexual Intercourse (forget Rape,
In message <xn0ov3g4p73jb9g001@post.eweka.nl>, Blueshirt
<blueshirt@indigo.news> writes
Daniel70 wrote:
The True Doctor wrote on 28/12/24 11:08 am:
[Snip]
Then he'd be a bigger pervert than he is already.
And Aggy knows everything Pervert related!!
Every subject needs an expert.
How old is he again? 2000? 3000? How old was she? How can a
relationship with such an age gap be appropriate?
That would pretty much rule out any relationships for the Doctor,
since female Time Lords are few and far between, unless you
want him to have a bromance with the Master, which doesn't bear
thinking about.
There shouldn't be any romance for the Doctor in Doctor Who. He's
already been a father and grandfather so doesn't need to have a
sexual or romantic relationship with anyone unless it's to produce
children, which means with members of his own species.
etc.),
Insert
'for procreation purposes'
yet WE Humans do it .... over and over again, just for Pleasure??--
Why one Rule for RL and another Rule for SF/TV??
Daniel
Daniel70 wrote:
Blueshirt wrote on 2/1/25 5:15 am:
Daniel70 wrote:AH!! Bloody Skippy!! I think I was busy watching 'The Jetsons'
Gee, I didn't know you had lived in Australia for some
time!!
I used to watch Skippy!
when 'Skippy' was on!
tch tch tch.
What's wrong Skip? Did the fella from Oz say something funny?
tch tch tch tch, tch tch...
You're right Skip.
tch tch, tch-tch, tch.
Me too.
Hornplayer9599 wrote:
On 1/2/2025 02:47, Blueshirt wrote:
Thinking about it, RADW is actually missing a Good Doctor...
We've a Doctor, a True Doctor and a Last Doctor.
I am going to be presenting my dissertation (Abnormal
Psychology) this spring. By May, I might be an Actual Doctor.
Will that work?
Of course... you can be The Horny Doctor!
:-)
On 02/01/2025 17:18, Hornplayer9599 wrote:
On 1/2/2025 02:47, Blueshirt wrote:
Thinking about it, RADW is actually missing a Good Doctor...
We've a Doctor, a True Doctor and a Last Doctor.
I am going to be presenting my dissertation (Abnormal Psychology) this
spring. By May, I might be an *Actual* Doctor. Will that work?
Better invite some Scientologists along to challenge it while they wire
you up to a sensitive galvanometer.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." -William Shatner
On 1/2/2025 02:47, Blueshirt wrote:
Thinking about it, RADW is actually missing a Good Doctor...
We've a Doctor, a True Doctor and a Last Doctor.
I am going to be presenting my dissertation (Abnormal Psychology) this >spring. By May, I might be an *Actual* Doctor. Will that work?
--
Intelligence is no guarantee against being dead wrong.
--Carl Sagan
On 02/01/2025 12:19, The Doctor wrote:
In article <vl5ndd$39kjf$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The True Doctor wrote on 2/1/25 12:24 pm:
On 29/12/2024 09:28, Blueshirt wrote:It seems to me that our (male) Doctors have not all been the same size
Daniel70 wrote:
John Hall wrote on 28/12/24 9:35 pm:
unless you want him to have a bromance with the Master, which
doesn't bear thinking about.
So why, oh, why did YOU make us think of it, John?? ;-P
Well, we've had a female Master and a male Doctor, plus a female
Doctor with a male Master... so romances couldn't be entirely
ruled out. As unlikely as they might seem to us now.
Maybe it's something RTD will throw in to the mix one day?!
What if the woman is forced to regenerate while pregnant? The foetus
would die. That's why Time Lords cannot change gender and that along
with the Timeless Child monster is why Doctor Who ended in 2017.
and shape.
What happens to that extra matter if The Doctor regenerates into a
smaller body?? Or vice-versa??
If (whatever) can happen in a Male --> Male transition, why can't
similar happen in a Male --> Female transition or in a Female -> Male
transition??
Bogus their Neil Gaiman!
Another woke pervert. You could see his sick degeneracy when he lectured >people about their sexuality in the second series of Good Omens.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." -William Shatner
The True loon let loose with:
On 02/01/2025 09:48, Daniel70 wrote:
It seems to me that our (male) Doctors have not all been the same size
and shape.
What happens to that extra matter if The Doctor regenerates into a
smaller body?? Or vice-versa??
If (whatever) can happen in a Male --> Male transition, why can't
similar happen in a Male --> Female transition or in a Female -> Male
transition??
That is tantamount to condoning abortion at all stages of pregnancy.
What about the life of the unborn child?
Abortions are deliberate. This is more like acknowledging that
miscarriages can happen at all stages of pregnancy.
OTOH we don’t even know for certain if Gallifreyan women do
get pregnant. What if they lay eggs instead?
--
solar penguin
On 30/12/2024 15:21, The Doctor wrote:
In article <wa+GRWEwKncnFwwF@jhall_nospamxx.co.uk>,
John Hall <john@jhall.co.uk> wrote:
In message <xn0ov66r02uh1k00a@post.eweka.nl>, Blueshirt
<blueshirt@indigo.news> writes
The Doctor wrote:
In article <vkr29m$s2kr$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
John Hall wrote on 28/12/24 9:35 pm:
That would pretty much rule out any relationships for the
Doctor, since female Time Lords are few and far between,
How would we know?? I mean the few times we have seen the
High Council of The Time Lords, I'm sure I saw some Females.
Even if you didn't see any, some of the male Time Lords on the
High Council might become Time Ladies after their next
regeneration. (It's in the show - so it's canon!)
The other 94 Female Time Ladies might have been 'Off-World'
or dealing with The Common Peoples, maybe!!
Romana, Flavia ...
The 13th Doctor!
I'm sure there might once have been plenty of female Time Lords, but
AIUI the destruction of Gallifrey wiped out all the Time Lords except
for those who were off-planet, and very few Time Lords other than the
Doctor and the Master ever seemed to go off-planet; they were an
amazingly insular race. And - again AIUI - the destruction of Gallifrey
made even going back to the planet before it was destroyed impossible,
even though that doesn't seem to make any sense.
The whole reason why to retcon the timeless Child!
Exactly! Matt Smith erased his entire existence from the whole universe.
Why didn't he spot the Timeless Child monster?
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." -William Shatner
On 30/12/2024 16:40, Blueshirt wrote:
John Hall wrote:
I'm sure there might once have been plenty of female Time
Lords, but AIUI the destruction of Gallifrey wiped out all the
Time Lords except for those who were off-planet, and very few
Time Lords other than the Doctor and the Master ever seemed to
go off-planet; they were an amazingly insular race. And -
again AIUI - the destruction of Gallifrey made even going back
to the planet before it was destroyed impossible, even though
that doesn't seem to make any sense.
"Doctor Who" - as a show - likes its "fixed points" in time,
things that the Doctor can't alter. So yes, Gallifrey has been
destroyed and once again the Doctor is the last surviving Time
Lord... or so he believes.
It wasn't put into a time-loop so this destruction can easily be undone.
This proves that the Timeless Child monster and everything connected
with it is a hallucination by Capaldi in his last milliseconds of life.
However, I am sure that if an Executive Producer of Doctor Who
needs to change that to suit a future storyline, they will.
It will be interesting to see who Anita Dobson's character in
S2/S15 actually is and where she's from, as it seems likely that
No one cares.
"Mrs Flood" is a female Time Lord. (My assumption is based on
her knowing what a TARDIS was.) Maybe she was off-planet when
Gallifrey was destroyed, or we may get some timey-wimey answer
that is was only kind-of destroyed and working together herself
and the Doctor can get it back, or something... who knows? But
in Doctor Who, like in comics, things don't always stay dead...
even planets!
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." -William Shatner
On 02/01/2025 22:09, solar imbecile wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 02/01/2025 09:48, Daniel70 wrote:
It seems to me that our (male) Doctors have not all been the same size >>>> and shape.
What happens to that extra matter if The Doctor regenerates into a
smaller body?? Or vice-versa??
If (whatever) can happen in a Male --> Male transition, why can't
similar happen in a Male --> Female transition or in a Female -> Male
transition??
That is tantamount to condoning abortion at all stages of pregnancy.
What about the life of the unborn child?
Abortions are deliberate. This is more like acknowledging that
miscarriages can happen at all stages of pregnancy.
This is not a miscarriage. It's murder. If the pregnant Time Lady
regenerates into another Time Lady then the foetus would be able to
survive and be born. It can't be born if she has to regenerate into a
man because of a degenerate ill-conceived regeneration process to pander
to a small bunch of woke retards.
OTOH we don’t even know for certain if Gallifreyan women do
get pregnant. What if they lay eggs instead?
If they laid eggs then they would have to incubate them. Where are the >incubators? Is Romana Dejah Thoris? In any case, how would an egg come
out of a man? The problem still remains. Allowing a pregnant Time Lady
to regenerate into a man is tantamount to murder of the unborn child,
and that includes eggs.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." -William Shatner
The True loon let loose with:
On 02/01/2025 22:09, solar imbecile wrote:
The True loon let loose with:
On 02/01/2025 09:48, Daniel70 wrote:
It seems to me that our (male) Doctors have not all been the same size >>>>> and shape.
What happens to that extra matter if The Doctor regenerates into a
smaller body?? Or vice-versa??
If (whatever) can happen in a Male --> Male transition, why can't
similar happen in a Male --> Female transition or in a Female -> Male >>>>> transition??
That is tantamount to condoning abortion at all stages of pregnancy.
What about the life of the unborn child?
Abortions are deliberate. This is more like acknowledging that
miscarriages can happen at all stages of pregnancy.
This is not a miscarriage. It's murder. If the pregnant Time Lady
regenerates into another Time Lady then the foetus would be able to
survive and be born. It can't be born if she has to regenerate into a
man because of a degenerate ill-conceived regeneration process to pander
to a small bunch of woke retards.
You’re getting confused between fact and fiction again.
Chibnall and Moffat didn’t actually murder any actual babies
by writing cross-gender regenerations.
MST3K mantra, and all that.
--
solar penguin
The True loon lost even more of it:
Fantasy has self consistent logical rules which have to
be followed and doesn't contravene basic laws of science
without a believable explanation.
You must have some very boring fantasies!
--
solar penguin
On 02/01/2025 09:58, Daniel70 wrote:
The True Doctor wrote on 2/1/25 12:27 pm:
On 30/12/2024 08:54, Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <vkr29m$s2kr$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
John Hall wrote on 28/12/24 9:35 pm:
That would pretty much rule out any relationships for the
Doctor, since female Time Lords are few and far between,
How would we know?? I mean the few times we have seen the
High Council of The Time Lords, I'm sure I saw some Females.
Even if you didn't see any, some of the male Time Lords on the
High Council might become Time Ladies after their next
regeneration. (It's in the show - so it's canon!)
No it isn't. Nothing after 2017 is canon, and Missy isn't canon either
unless the Master used her form as a disguise like his other disguises
which did not involve regeneration.
In which Doctor-period did we see a Gualifreyan General walk off screen
and change sex (from M -> F or F -> M)??
Eleventh Doctor, I think. So the suggestion was there WITH-IN Aggy's
'Doctor Who ended in 2017' time frame. Even before The Master became
Missy!!
Nothing like that happened while the 11th Doctor was around.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." -William Shatner
On 03/01/2025 00:26, solar imbecile wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
Fantasy has self consistent logical rules which have to
be followed and doesn't contravene basic laws of science
without a believable explanation.
You must have some very boring fantasies!
Harry Potter was not boring and neither was Tolkein, Robert E Howard, or
John Norman. All of them followed self consistent logical rules and
basic science was not violated without provision of believable
explanations which were baked into the world building.
The degenerate woke retards writing Doctor Whoke think like 4 year old >children and don't give a stuff about the basics of fantasy let alone
science fiction. They're writing absolute s*t to promote a political
agenda and that's where there are virtually no viewers left for this show.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." -William Shatner
On 02/01/2025 17:18, Hornplayer9599 wrote:
On 1/2/2025 02:47, Blueshirt wrote:
Thinking about it, RADW is actually missing a Good Doctor...
We've a Doctor, a True Doctor and a Last Doctor.
I am going to be presenting my dissertation (Abnormal Psychology)
this spring. By May, I might be an *Actual* Doctor. Will that
work?
Better invite some Scientologists along to challenge it while they
wire you up to a sensitive galvanometer.
On 1/2/2025 02:47, Blueshirt wrote:
Thinking about it, RADW is actually missing a Good Doctor...
We've a Doctor, a True Doctor and a Last Doctor.
I am going to be presenting my dissertation (Abnormal Psychology) this spring. By May, I might be an *Actual* Doctor. Will that work?
On 29/12/2024 09:28, Blueshirt wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
John Hall wrote on 28/12/24 9:35 pm:
unless you want him to have a bromance with the Master, which
doesn't bear thinking about.
So why, oh, why did YOU make us think of it, John?? ;-P
Well, we've had a female Master and a male Doctor, plus a female
Doctor with a male Master... so romances couldn't be entirely ruled
out. As unlikely as they might seem to us now.
Maybe it's something RTD will throw in to the mix one day?!
What if the woman is forced to regenerate while pregnant? The foetus
would die. That's why Time Lords cannot change gender and that along
with the Timeless Child monster is why Doctor Who ended in 2017.
In article <vl67aa$3cf18$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 2/1/25 11:19 pm:
In article <vl5ndd$39kjf$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel70
<daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
It seems to me that our (male) Doctors have not all been the same
size and shape.
What happens to that extra matter if The Doctor regenerates into a
smaller body?? Or vice-versa??
If (whatever) can happen in a Male --> Male transition, why can't
similar happen in a Male --> Female transition or in a Female ->
Male transition??
Bogus their Neil Gaiman!
???
Your memory is very impaired.
In article <vl6aam$3d1cc$1@dont-email.me>, solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
Binky bleated:
In article <vl5ndd$39kjf$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel70What is bogussing and why do you want Daniel to do it to
<daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
It seems to me that our (male) Doctors have not all been the
same size and shape.
What happens to that extra matter if The Doctor regenerates
into a smaller body?? Or vice-versa??
If (whatever) can happen in a Male --> Male transition, why
can't similar happen in a Male --> Female transition or in a
Female -> Male transition??
Bogus their Neil Gaiman!
somebody’s Neil Gaiman? (How many Neil Gaimans are there
anyway?)
REcall The Doctor's Wife by ...
Daniel70 wrote:
The True Doctor wrote on 2/1/25 12:24 pm:
It seems to me that our (male) Doctors have not all been the
What if the woman is forced to regenerate while pregnant?
The foetus would die. That's why Time Lords cannot change
gender and that along with the Timeless Child monster is
why Doctor Who ended in 2017.
same size and shape.
What happens to that extra matter if The Doctor regenerates
into a smaller body?? Or vice-versa??
If (whatever) can happen in a Male --> Male transition, why
can't similar happen in a Male --> Female transition or in a
Female -> Male transition??
The real question is... if a female Time Lord regenerates in to
a male Time Lord, do they regenerate wearing her knickers and a
Bra?
On 30/12/2024 16:40, Blueshirt wrote:
"Doctor Who" - as a show - likes its "fixed points" in time,
things that the Doctor can't alter. So yes, Gallifrey has
been destroyed and once again the Doctor is the last
surviving Time Lord... or so he believes.
It wasn't put into a time-loop so this destruction can easily
be undone.
This proves that the Timeless Child monster and everything
connected with it is a hallucination by Capaldi in his last
milliseconds of life.
However, I am sure that if an Executive Producer of Doctor
Who needs to change that to suit a future storyline, they
will.
It will be interesting to see who Anita Dobson's character in
S2/S15 actually is and where she's from, as it seems likely
that
No one cares.
On 02/01/2025 09:48, Daniel70 wrote:
The True Doctor wrote on 2/1/25 12:24 pm:
On 29/12/2024 09:28, Blueshirt wrote:It seems to me that our (male) Doctors have not all been the same
Daniel70 wrote:
John Hall wrote on 28/12/24 9:35 pm:
unless you want him to have a bromance with the Master,
which doesn't bear thinking about.
So why, oh, why did YOU make us think of it, John?? ;-P
Well, we've had a female Master and a male Doctor, plus a
female Doctor with a male Master... so romances couldn't be
entirely ruled out. As unlikely as they might seem to us now.
Maybe it's something RTD will throw in to the mix one day?!
What if the woman is forced to regenerate while pregnant? The
foetus would die. That's why Time Lords cannot change gender and
that along with the Timeless Child monster is why Doctor Who
ended in 2017.
size and shape.
What happens to that extra matter if The Doctor regenerates into a
smaller body?? Or vice-versa??
If (whatever) can happen in a Male --> Male transition, why can't
similar happen in a Male --> Female transition or in a Female ->
Male transition??
That is tantamount to condoning abortion at all stages of pregnancy.
What about the life of the unborn child?
The True Doctor wrote on 2/1/25 12:24 pm:
On 29/12/2024 09:28, Blueshirt wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
Well, we've had a female Master and a male Doctor, plus a
female Doctor with a male Master... so romances couldn't
be entirely ruled out. As unlikely as they might seem to
us now.
Maybe it's something RTD will throw in to the mix one day?!
What if the woman is forced to regenerate while pregnant?
The foetus would die. That's why Time Lords cannot change
gender and that along with the Timeless Child monster is why
Doctor Who ended in 2017.
Sorry, where (apart from in your mind) has it been STATED that
'Time Lords cannot change gender', Aggy??
Blueshirt wrote on 3/1/25 2:50 am:
The real question is... if a female Time Lord regenerates in
to a male Time Lord, do they regenerate wearing her knickers
and a Bra?
Well, in the Male sequence, they DID regenerate wearing the
prior instances clothes ...... so .......!
The True Doctor wrote on 3/1/25 8:33 am:
On 02/01/2025 09:48, Daniel70 wrote:
The True Doctor wrote on 2/1/25 12:24 pm:
On 29/12/2024 09:28, Blueshirt wrote:
Well, we've had a female Master and a male Doctor,
plus a female Doctor with a male Master... so romances
couldn't be entirely ruled out. As unlikely as they
might seem to us now.
Maybe it's something RTD will throw in to the mix one
day?!
What if the woman is forced to regenerate while
pregnant? The foetus would die. That's why Time Lords
cannot change gender and that along with the Timeless
Child monster is why Doctor Who ended in 2017.
It seems to me that our (male) Doctors have not all been
the same size and shape.
What happens to that extra matter if The Doctor
regenerates into a smaller body?? Or vice-versa??
If (whatever) can happen in a Male --> Male transition,
why can't similar happen in a Male --> Female transition
or in a Female -> Male transition??
That is tantamount to condoning abortion at all stages of
pregnancy. What about the life of the unborn child?
If DoctorDavid (10) had had a Toothache at the time of
re-generation, would DoctorMatt start off with a Toothache and
require a visit to The Dentist quick smart??
Does The TARDIS have a Doctor (MD), Dentist, etc., on
Speed-Dial?? ;-P
On 02/01/2025 09:58, Daniel70 wrote:
The True Doctor wrote on 2/1/25 12:27 pm:
On 30/12/2024 08:54, Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <vkr29m$s2kr$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
John Hall wrote on 28/12/24 9:35 pm:
That would pretty much rule out any relationships for the
Doctor, since female Time Lords are few and far between,
How would we know?? I mean the few times we have seen the
High Council of The Time Lords, I'm sure I saw some Females.
Even if you didn't see any, some of the male Time Lords on the
High Council might become Time Ladies after their next
regeneration. (It's in the show - so it's canon!)
No it isn't. Nothing after 2017 is canon, and Missy isn't canon
either unless the Master used her form as a disguise like his other
disguises which did not involve regeneration.
In which Doctor-period did we see a Gualifreyan General walk off
screen and change sex (from M -> F or F -> M)??
Eleventh Doctor, I think. So the suggestion was there WITH-IN Aggy's
'Doctor Who ended in 2017' time frame. Even before The Master became
Missy!!
Nothing like that happened while the 11th Doctor was around.
The idiot insisted:
In article <vl6aam$3d1cc$1@dont-email.me>, solar penguin
<solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
Binky bleated:
In article <vl5ndd$39kjf$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel70
<daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
It seems to me that our (male) Doctors have not all been the
same size and shape.
What happens to that extra matter if The Doctor regenerates
into a smaller body?? Or vice-versa??
If (whatever) can happen in a Male --> Male transition, why
can't similar happen in a Male --> Female transition or in a
Female -> Male transition??
Bogus their Neil Gaiman!
What is bogussing and why do you want Daniel to do it to
somebody’s Neil Gaiman? (How many Neil Gaimans are there
anyway?)
REcall The Doctor's Wife by ...
It was by Neil Gaiman.
That still doesn’t explain why:
a. Gaiman is somebody’s,
b. Gaiman needs to be bogussed,
and
c. Daniel is the person to do it.
Daniel70 wrote:
Blueshirt wrote on 3/1/25 2:50 am:
The real question is... if a female Time Lord regenerates in
to a male Time Lord, do they regenerate wearing her knickers
and a Bra?
Well, in the Male sequence, they DID regenerate wearing the
prior instances clothes ...... so .......!
Does that mean Sylvester McCoy regenerated wearing Colin Baker's
underpants?! (Urgh!)
The True Doctor wrote on 2/1/25 12:22 pm:
On 28/12/2024 10:35, John Hall wrote:But (RL) isn't the basic purpose of Sexual Intercourse (forget Rape,
In message <xn0ov3g4p73jb9g001@post.eweka.nl>, Blueshirt
<blueshirt@indigo.news> writes
Daniel70 wrote:
The True Doctor wrote on 28/12/24 11:08 am:
[Snip]
Then he'd be a bigger pervert than he is already.
And Aggy knows everything Pervert related!!
Every subject needs an expert.
How old is he again? 2000? 3000? How old was she? How can a
relationship with such an age gap be appropriate?
That would pretty much rule out any relationships for the Doctor,
since female Time Lords are few and far between, unless you want
him to have a bromance with the Master, which doesn't bear thinking
about.
There shouldn't be any romance for the Doctor in Doctor Who. He's
already been a father and grandfather so doesn't need to have a
sexual or romantic relationship with anyone unless it's to produce
children, which means with members of his own species.
etc.), yet WE Humans do it .... over and over again, just for Pleasure??
Why one Rule for RL and another Rule for SF/TV??
Daniel70 wrote:
The True Doctor wrote on 3/1/25 8:33 am:
On 02/01/2025 09:48, Daniel70 wrote:
If DoctorDavid (10) had had a Toothache at the time ofIt seems to me that our (male) Doctors have not all been
the same size and shape.
What happens to that extra matter if The Doctor
regenerates into a smaller body?? Or vice-versa??
If (whatever) can happen in a Male --> Male transition,
why can't similar happen in a Male --> Female transition
or in a Female -> Male transition??
That is tantamount to condoning abortion at all stages of
pregnancy. What about the life of the unborn child?
re-generation, would DoctorMatt start off with a Toothache and
require a visit to The Dentist quick smart??
Does The TARDIS have a Doctor (MD), Dentist, etc., on
Speed-Dial?? ;-P
I think we are over-analysing stuff a bit too much now!
It's time to go off and write down some train numbers...
In article <xn0ov0u2q4ibsrd003@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Some people might not have liked the ending, some people might
not have even noticed the sub-text, or cared... but for a
Christmas Day episode something like that was to be expected,
especially once we knew the story was about a star. (Plus, the
"no wonder there was no room at the inn" line fore-shadowed
this.)
Overall I'd rate "Joy to the World" 7/10.
(0.05 + 8.5+ 7.5+ 7)/4 -> 23.05/4 -> 5.07625
The Doctor wrote on 27/12/24 2:21 am:
In article <xn0ov0u2q4ibsrd003@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
<Snip>
Gee Whiz, Gobble-de-gook, I thought YOU had been to Uni and got a DegreeSome people might not have liked the ending, some people might
not have even noticed the sub-text, or cared... but for a
Christmas Day episode something like that was to be expected,
especially once we knew the story was about a star. (Plus, the
"no wonder there was no room at the inn" line fore-shadowed
this.)
Overall I'd rate "Joy to the World" 7/10.
(0.05 + 8.5+ 7.5+ 7)/4 -> 23.05/4 -> 5.07625
in Mathematics!!
That's some of Mummy and Daddy's money well spent!! ..... *NOT*
5.07625 x 4 = ?????????????
--
Daniel
Daniel70 wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 27/12/24 2:21 am:
In article <xn0ov0u2q4ibsrd003@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
<Snip>
Gee Whiz, Gobble-de-gook, I thought YOU had been to Uni and got a DegreeSome people might not have liked the ending, some people might
not have even noticed the sub-text, or cared... but for a
Christmas Day episode something like that was to be expected,
especially once we knew the story was about a star. (Plus, the
"no wonder there was no room at the inn" line fore-shadowed
this.)
Overall I'd rate "Joy to the World" 7/10.
(0.05 + 8.5+ 7.5+ 7)/4 -> 23.05/4 -> 5.07625
in Mathematics!!
That's some of Mummy and Daddy's money well spent!! ..... *NOT*
5.07625 x 4 = ?????????????
you must still live at home ,
that's where names develop Gobble-de-gook!!
On 12/26/2024 09:04, Blueshirt wrote:
Festive fun with the 15th Doctor...and plenty of schmaltz.
"Joy to the World" is probably one of the 15th Doctor's
strongest stories (so far) in terms of the actual story, with
Ncuti's performance being just right for this heart-warming
festive episode.
Yes this was, on the whole, a solid story. That being said, I'm not
expecting the best Who stories to take place during the Christmas episodes...but this was a good one.
I liked the Time Hotel concept, where its visitors can open
doors to time portals (instead of rooms) and all of human
history is now available as mini-breaks for tourists. The
timey-wimey technobabble was par for the course too, but it
didn't overshadow the story.
At this point we probably sub-consciously expect the timey-wimey stuff
to be there and we just mentally tone it down to keep it out of the way.
I did like the Time Hotel.
A lot of the pre-episode hype featured Nicola Coughlan as Joy
but for me Anita was the better companion substitute. The scenes
with the Doctor and Anita were the real heart of this episode.
There was good chemistry between the Doctor and Anita...I was surprised
that the Doctor didn't invite her to be the new companion in the TARDIS
Sure, that possibility is still on the table for the season proper, and
I think that it would be a truly missed opportunity if they don't have
him swing back to the hotel and bring her onboard.
As for Joy, it seemed that, for the most part, she was there "just to be there" until she started talking to the briefcase at the end (for lack
of a better description). Other than that, there wasn't a whole lot for
her to do...even as filler material.
Some people might not have liked the ending, some people might
not have even noticed the sub-text, or cared... but for a
Christmas Day episode something like that was to be expected,
especially once we knew the story was about a star. (Plus, the
"no wonder there was no room at the inn" line fore-shadowed
this.)
Overall I'd rate "Joy to the World" 7/10.
Yeah, 7/10 is a good call. Some of the *minor* things I would also
mention is that they got the year wrong at the end (0001)...and...like
in last year's special, it looks like Gutwa drank about 50 cups of
coffee before he went in front of the camera and was completely wired on caffeine. Yes, part of that is the pacing of a one episode story (which
I've never been a fan of, preferring multi-episodic stories, but they
aren't going to change that anytime soon, so...). But just get the
Doctor to slow down just a bit, and things won't feel so rushed, and
there can be more time for character development.
On 26/12/2024 15:40, Hornplayer9599 wrote:
On 12/26/2024 09:04, Blueshirt wrote:
[Snip]
A lot of the pre-episode hype featured Nicola Coughlan
as Joy
The fat woman was a moron.
There was good chemistry between the Doctor and Anita...I
was surprised that the Doctor didn't invite her to be the
new companion in the TARDIS
Then he'd be a bigger pervert than he is already. How old is
he again? 2000? 3000? How old was she? How can a relationship
with such an age gap be appropriate? Does he see her like a
human would see a pet hamster?
Sure, that possibility is still on the table for the season
proper, and I think that it would be a truly missed
opportunity if they don't have him swing back to the hotel
and bring her onboard.
He's nothing more than a degenerate tease, as well as a slut, a
a slag, and a whore.
As for Joy, it seemed that, for the most part, she was there
"just to be there" until she started talking to the
briefcase at the end (for lack of a better description).
Other than that, there wasn't a whole lot for her to
do... even as filler material.
She was there to give morbidly obese people representation.
Now I realize that calling her fat is an insult to fat people.
[Snip]
in last year's special, it looks like Gutwa drank about 50
cups of coffee before he went in front of the camera and
was completely wired on caffeine. Yes, part of that is the
pacing of a one episode story (which
You mean the pervert can't act in a serious manner. His entire
range is limited to slut, slag, tease, and whore.
I've never been a fan of, preferring multi-episodic stories,
but they aren't going to change that anytime soon, so...).
But just get the Doctor to slow down just a bit, and things
won't feel so rushed, and there can be more time for
character development.
They don't want to develop characters, or science, or reason,
or logical and rational thinking. They want to sexually
indoctrinate and groom children by causing to act and behave
based on inappropriate and irrational feelings and emotions
which they are not permitted to resist. Look at how the
morbidly obese women could not resist committing suicide and
what it represents as a metaphor.
In article <u9-cnd7GVcCGW_P6nZ2dnZfqn_adnZ2d@giganews.com>,
% <pursent100@gmail.com> wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 27/12/24 2:21 am:
In article <xn0ov0u2q4ibsrd003@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
<Snip>
Gee Whiz, Gobble-de-gook, I thought YOU had been to Uni and got a Degree >>> in Mathematics!!Some people might not have liked the ending, some people might
not have even noticed the sub-text, or cared... but for a
Christmas Day episode something like that was to be expected,
especially once we knew the story was about a star. (Plus, the
"no wonder there was no room at the inn" line fore-shadowed
this.)
Overall I'd rate "Joy to the World" 7/10.
(0.05 + 8.5+ 7.5+ 7)/4 -> 23.05/4 -> 5.07625
That's some of Mummy and Daddy's money well spent!! ..... *NOT*
5.07625 x 4 = ?????????????
you must still live at home ,
that's where names develop Gobble-de-gook!!
Honest % nails Danyboy to the Wall yet again!
In article <vkm039$3i8fj$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 27/12/24 2:21 am:
In article <xn0ov0u2q4ibsrd003@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
<Snip>
Gee Whiz, Gobble-de-gook, I thought YOU had been to Uni and got a DegreeSome people might not have liked the ending, some people might
not have even noticed the sub-text, or cared... but for a
Christmas Day episode something like that was to be expected,
especially once we knew the story was about a star. (Plus, the
"no wonder there was no room at the inn" line fore-shadowed
this.)
Overall I'd rate "Joy to the World" 7/10.
(0.05 + 8.5+ 7.5+ 7)/4 -> 23.05/4 -> 5.07625
in Mathematics!!
That's some of Mummy and Daddy's money well spent!! ..... *NOT*
5.07625 x 4 = ?????????????
23.05
On 26/12/2024 15:40, Hornplayer9599 wrote:
On 12/26/2024 09:04, Blueshirt wrote:
Festive fun with the 15th Doctor...and plenty of schmaltz.
"Joy to the World" is probably one of the 15th Doctor's
strongest stories (so far) in terms of the actual story, with
Ncuti's performance being just right for this heart-warming
festive episode.
Yes this was, on the whole, a solid story. That being said, I'm
not
Solid in like leaking like a sieve as if it were written by a 4 year
old child that thinks a sieve being made of solid materials can hold
water.
expecting the best Who stories to take place during the Christmas
episodes...but this was a good one.
The least you can expect is for them to adhere to the basic laws of
physics
The entre premise of a Time Hotel undermines the entire plot since
if you have enough energy to permit time travel why do you need to
make a new star?
Why doesn't Villenguard have time travel technology of its own?
Then he'd be a bigger pervert than he is already.
How old is he again? 2000? 3000? How old was she? How can a
relationship with such an age gap be appropriate? Does he see her
like a human would see a pet hamster?
Yeah, 7/10 is a good call. Some of the *minor* things I would
also mention is that they got the year wrong at the end
(0001)...and...like
You think it should have been 6 or 4 BC instead?
Why only 4 digits? Are they insinuating that the world ends before
they year 9999?
Or are they just trying to avoid AD to be racist to Christians?
Why didn't the retards just use the Roman year instead? The 754th of
the foundation of Rome?
Hornplayer9599 wrote on 3/1/25 4:18 am:^^^^^<-Paedophile talker noted!
On 1/2/2025 02:47, Blueshirt wrote:
Thinking about it, RADW is actually missing a Good Doctor...
We've a Doctor, a True Doctor and a Last Doctor.
I am going to be presenting my dissertation (Abnormal Psychology) this
spring. By May, I might be an *Actual* Doctor. Will that work?
Look out, Binky, YOU might be Dr Hornplayer's first Patient!!
--
Daniel
The True Doctor wrote on 3/1/25 8:30 am:^^^^^<-Paedophile Talker noted.
On 02/01/2025 17:18, Hornplayer9599 wrote:Ah!! 'Scientology'!! Is THAT the 'Religion' to which Binky belongs??
On 1/2/2025 02:47, Blueshirt wrote:
Thinking about it, RADW is actually missing a Good Doctor...
We've a Doctor, a True Doctor and a Last Doctor.
I am going to be presenting my dissertation (Abnormal Psychology)
this spring. By May, I might be an *Actual* Doctor. Will that
work?
Better invite some Scientologists along to challenge it while they
wire you up to a sensitive galvanometer.
Of course, Binky will not admit it, if it is!!
--
Daniel
The Doctor wrote on 3/1/25 1:42 pm:^^^^^<-Paedophile talker noted
In article <vl67aa$3cf18$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 2/1/25 11:19 pm:
In article <vl5ndd$39kjf$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel70
<daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
<Snip>
It seems to me that our (male) Doctors have not all been the same
size and shape.
What happens to that extra matter if The Doctor regenerates into a
smaller body?? Or vice-versa??
If (whatever) can happen in a Male --> Male transition, why can't
similar happen in a Male --> Female transition or in a Female ->
Male transition??
Bogus their Neil Gaiman!
???
Your memory is very impaired.
Not in this case, Binky, I'm just wondering what the fuck YOU, Binky,
meant by "Bogus their Neil Gaiman!", Binky!!
Maybe YOU, Binky, might have made a ERROR there, Binky.
--
Daniel
The True Doctor wrote:
On 02/01/2025 15:50, Blueshirt wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
If (whatever) can happen in a Male --> Male transition,
why can't similar happen in a Male --> Female transition
or in a Female -> Male transition??
The real question is... if a female Time Lord regenerates in
to a male Time Lord, do they regenerate wearing her knickers
and a Bra?
All the more reason why Time Lords cannot change gender.
Well, you should really have said "should not change gender",
instead of "cannot change gender"... as we have already seen
examples of it actually happening in the show. So right or
wrong, you can't put the toothpaste back in to the tube, it is
part of the show now. You can thank Steven Moffat for that
change.
It's these important questions that the show should be
dealing with, not messing around with "mavity".
And all the more reason that this series is a hallucination
along with Isaac Newton being turned into an Indian.
There's definitely something ongoing about the "mavity" universe
alright, but you'll have to stay tuned to find out... then we'll
find out the truth about our mate Isaac.
Blueshirt wrote on 3/1/25 2:50 am:
Daniel70 wrote:
The True Doctor wrote on 2/1/25 12:24 pm:
It seems to me that our (male) Doctors have not all been the
What if the woman is forced to regenerate while pregnant?
The foetus would die. That's why Time Lords cannot change
gender and that along with the Timeless Child monster is
why Doctor Who ended in 2017.
same size and shape.
What happens to that extra matter if The Doctor regenerates
into a smaller body?? Or vice-versa??
If (whatever) can happen in a Male --> Male transition, why
can't similar happen in a Male --> Female transition or in a
Female -> Male transition??
The real question is... if a female Time Lord regenerates in to
a male Time Lord, do they regenerate wearing her knickers and a
Bra?
Well, in the Male sequence, they DID regenerate wearing the prior
instances clothes ...... so .......!
--
Daniel
The True Doctor wrote:
On 30/12/2024 16:40, Blueshirt wrote:
"Doctor Who" - as a show - likes its "fixed points" in time,
things that the Doctor can't alter. So yes, Gallifrey has
been destroyed and once again the Doctor is the last
surviving Time Lord... or so he believes.
It wasn't put into a time-loop so this destruction can easily
be undone.
My guess is it will be undone... at some stage.
And if it is the 15th Doctor that does it... we all know that he
will be crying with joy.
This proves that the Timeless Child monster and everything
connected with it is a hallucination by Capaldi in his last
milliseconds of life.
Hmmm... I wouldn't go THAT far now!
However, I am sure that if an Executive Producer of Doctor
Who needs to change that to suit a future storyline, they
will.
It will be interesting to see who Anita Dobson's character in
S2/S15 actually is and where she's from, as it seems likely
that
No one cares.
You cared enough to reply "no one cares", as opposed to just
ignoring my comment... so that means you care!
The True Doctor wrote:
On 02/01/2025 08:16, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
No it isn't. Nothing after 2017 is canon, and Missy isn't
canon either unless the Master used her form as a disguise
like his other disguises which did not involve
regeneration.
Er... you must haver missed "Hell Bent". Is that canon then?
Just to freshen your memory... "Hell Bent" featured an
on-screen regeneration where a Time Lord changed sex (male
to female), plus the same regeneration also showed a Time
Lord changing skin colour.
This was in a televised episode of Doctor Who in 2015.
None of this happened just like Kill the Moon didn't happen.
Er... okay.
Do you seriously believe the moon hatched into a plant sized
dragon which then few away in outer space without
catastrophically disturbing the Earth's orbit, and then
somehow the moon regained all of the missing mass out of
nothing and reformed to look exactly like it did before?
Well no, I don't "seriously believe" any of that happened, as
Doctor Who is a fictional TV show! So all of that mumbo-jumbo is
just made-up to entertain us. Clearly that episode didn't
entertain you - or me actually - which is fine, as you can't
please everybody. I just ignore such episodes and try to forget
about them.
These are all hallucinations of the 12th Doctor after he was
shot by the Cybermen in The Doctor Falls, just before he dies.
If that works for you, who am I to argue. It's your head-canon!
I'm pretty sure "Hell Bent" featured Peter Capaldi's
Doctor...
I'm pretty sure neither that nor Kill the Moon actually
happened. Maybe the 12th Doctor was suffering from PTSD from
getting Clara killed and started hallucinating from back then
or the trauma corrupted his memory.
It happened Jim... but not as we know it!
The True Doctor wrote on 3/1/25 8:33 am:
On 02/01/2025 09:48, Daniel70 wrote:If DoctorDavid (10) had had a Toothache at the time of re-generation,
The True Doctor wrote on 2/1/25 12:24 pm:
On 29/12/2024 09:28, Blueshirt wrote:It seems to me that our (male) Doctors have not all been the same
Daniel70 wrote:
John Hall wrote on 28/12/24 9:35 pm:
unless you want him to have a bromance with the Master,
which doesn't bear thinking about.
So why, oh, why did YOU make us think of it, John?? ;-P
Well, we've had a female Master and a male Doctor, plus a
female Doctor with a male Master... so romances couldn't be
entirely ruled out. As unlikely as they might seem to us now.
Maybe it's something RTD will throw in to the mix one day?!
What if the woman is forced to regenerate while pregnant? The
foetus would die. That's why Time Lords cannot change gender and
that along with the Timeless Child monster is why Doctor Who
ended in 2017.
size and shape.
What happens to that extra matter if The Doctor regenerates into a
smaller body?? Or vice-versa??
If (whatever) can happen in a Male --> Male transition, why can't
similar happen in a Male --> Female transition or in a Female ->
Male transition??
That is tantamount to condoning abortion at all stages of pregnancy.
What about the life of the unborn child?
would DoctorMatt start off with a Toothache and require a visit to The >Dentist quick smart??
Does The TARDIS have a Doctor (MD), Dentist, etc., on Speed-Dial?? ;-P
--
Daniel
Daniel70 wrote:
Blueshirt wrote on 3/1/25 2:50 am:
The real question is... if a female Time Lord regenerates in
to a male Time Lord, do they regenerate wearing her knickers
and a Bra?
Well, in the Male sequence, they DID regenerate wearing the
prior instances clothes ...... so .......!
Does that mean Sylvester McCoy regenerated wearing Colin Baker's
underpants?! (Urgh!)
solar penguin wrote on 3/1/25 7:52 pm:
The idiot insisted:Didn't you know, Solar Penguin?? It seems I'm the 'Binky appointed'
In article <vl6aam$3d1cc$1@dont-email.me>, solar penguin
<solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
Binky bleated:
In article <vl5ndd$39kjf$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel70
<daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
It seems to me that our (male) Doctors have not all been the
same size and shape.
What happens to that extra matter if The Doctor regenerates
into a smaller body?? Or vice-versa??
If (whatever) can happen in a Male --> Male transition, why
can't similar happen in a Male --> Female transition or in a
Female -> Male transition??
Bogus their Neil Gaiman!
What is bogussing and why do you want Daniel to do it to somebody’s
Neil Gaiman? (How many Neil Gaimans are there anyway?)
REcall The Doctor's Wife by ...
It was by Neil Gaiman.
That still doesn’t explain why:
a. Gaiman is somebody’s,
b. Gaiman needs to be bogussed,
and
c. Daniel is the person to do it.
'Neil Gaiman' BOGUS-er!! (Whatever the HELL that is!!)
Daniel70 wrote:
The True Doctor wrote on 3/1/25 8:33 am:
On 02/01/2025 09:48, Daniel70 wrote:If DoctorDavid (10) had had a Toothache at the time of
The True Doctor wrote on 2/1/25 12:24 pm:
On 29/12/2024 09:28, Blueshirt wrote:It seems to me that our (male) Doctors have not all been
Well, we've had a female Master and a male Doctor,
plus a female Doctor with a male Master... so romances
couldn't be entirely ruled out. As unlikely as they
might seem to us now.
Maybe it's something RTD will throw in to the mix one
day?!
What if the woman is forced to regenerate while
pregnant? The foetus would die. That's why Time Lords
cannot change gender and that along with the Timeless
Child monster is why Doctor Who ended in 2017.
the same size and shape.
What happens to that extra matter if The Doctor
regenerates into a smaller body?? Or vice-versa??
If (whatever) can happen in a Male --> Male transition,
why can't similar happen in a Male --> Female transition
or in a Female -> Male transition??
That is tantamount to condoning abortion at all stages of
pregnancy. What about the life of the unborn child?
re-generation, would DoctorMatt start off with a Toothache and
require a visit to The Dentist quick smart??
Does The TARDIS have a Doctor (MD), Dentist, etc., on
Speed-Dial?? ;-P
I think we are over-analysing stuff a bit too much now!
It's time to go off and write down some train numbers...
The True Doctor wrote on 3/1/25 10:29 am:
On 02/01/2025 09:58, Daniel70 wrote:Oh!! O.K., thank you for being so HELPFUL, Aggy.
The True Doctor wrote on 2/1/25 12:27 pm:
On 30/12/2024 08:54, Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <vkr29m$s2kr$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
John Hall wrote on 28/12/24 9:35 pm:
That would pretty much rule out any relationships for the
Doctor, since female Time Lords are few and far between,
How would we know?? I mean the few times we have seen the
High Council of The Time Lords, I'm sure I saw some Females.
Even if you didn't see any, some of the male Time Lords on the
High Council might become Time Ladies after their next
regeneration. (It's in the show - so it's canon!)
No it isn't. Nothing after 2017 is canon, and Missy isn't canon
either unless the Master used her form as a disguise like his other
disguises which did not involve regeneration.
In which Doctor-period did we see a Gualifreyan General walk off
screen and change sex (from M -> F or F -> M)??
Eleventh Doctor, I think. So the suggestion was there WITH-IN Aggy's
'Doctor Who ended in 2017' time frame. Even before The Master became
Missy!!
Nothing like that happened while the 11th Doctor was around.
Was it, maybe, with-in the 10th Doctors reign .... or the 12th Doctors
reign that such a transition/regeneration occurred??
--
Daniel
solar penguin wrote on 3/1/25 7:52 pm:^^^^^<-paedophile talker noted
The idiot insisted:Didn't you know, Solar Penguin?? It seems I'm the 'Binky appointed'
In article <vl6aam$3d1cc$1@dont-email.me>, solar penguin
<solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
Binky bleated:
In article <vl5ndd$39kjf$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel70
<daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
It seems to me that our (male) Doctors have not all been the
same size and shape.
What happens to that extra matter if The Doctor regenerates
into a smaller body?? Or vice-versa??
If (whatever) can happen in a Male --> Male transition, why
can't similar happen in a Male --> Female transition or in a
Female -> Male transition??
Bogus their Neil Gaiman!
What is bogussing and why do you want Daniel to do it to
somebody’s Neil Gaiman? (How many Neil Gaimans are there
anyway?)
REcall The Doctor's Wife by ...
It was by Neil Gaiman.
That still doesn’t explain why:
a. Gaiman is somebody’s,
b. Gaiman needs to be bogussed,
and
c. Daniel is the person to do it.
'Neil Gaiman' BOGUS-er!! (Whatever the HELL that is!!)
--
Daniel
The idiot insisted:
In article <vl6aam$3d1cc$1@dont-email.me>,
solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
Binky bleated:
In article <vl5ndd$39kjf$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
It seems to me that our (male) Doctors have not all been the same size >>>>> and shape.
What happens to that extra matter if The Doctor regenerates into a
smaller body?? Or vice-versa??
If (whatever) can happen in a Male --> Male transition, why can't
similar happen in a Male --> Female transition or in a Female -> Male >>>>> transition??
Bogus their Neil Gaiman!
What is bogussing and why do you want Daniel to do it to
somebody’s Neil Gaiman? (How many Neil Gaimans are there
anyway?)
REcall The Doctor's Wife by ...
It was by Neil Gaiman.
That still doesn’t explain why:
a. Gaiman is somebody’s,
b. Gaiman needs to be bogussed,
and
c. Daniel is the person to do it.
--
solar penguin
On 02/01/2025 10:07, Daniel70 wrote:
The True Doctor wrote on 2/1/25 12:22 pm:
On 28/12/2024 10:35, John Hall wrote:But (RL) isn't the basic purpose of Sexual Intercourse (forget Rape,
In message <xn0ov3g4p73jb9g001@post.eweka.nl>, Blueshirt
<blueshirt@indigo.news> writes
Daniel70 wrote:
The True Doctor wrote on 28/12/24 11:08 am:
[Snip]
Then he'd be a bigger pervert than he is already.
And Aggy knows everything Pervert related!!
Every subject needs an expert.
How old is he again? 2000? 3000? How old was she? How can a
relationship with such an age gap be appropriate?
That would pretty much rule out any relationships for the Doctor,
since female Time Lords are few and far between, unless you want
him to have a bromance with the Master, which doesn't bear thinking
about.
There shouldn't be any romance for the Doctor in Doctor Who. He's
already been a father and grandfather so doesn't need to have a
sexual or romantic relationship with anyone unless it's to produce
children, which means with members of his own species.
etc.), yet WE Humans do it .... over and over again, just for Pleasure??
Why one Rule for RL and another Rule for SF/TV??
This is a show that is intended to be watched by children. Only a sick >deranged pervert would promoted the idea of sex for pleasure to them.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." -William Shatner
Blueshirt wrote on 3/1/25 7:52 pm:
Daniel70 wrote:
The True Doctor wrote on 3/1/25 8:33 am:
On 02/01/2025 09:48, Daniel70 wrote:
<Snip>
I was going to reply 'A bit of Fresh Air can be good!' .... but thenIf DoctorDavid (10) had had a Toothache at the time ofIt seems to me that our (male) Doctors have not all been
the same size and shape.
What happens to that extra matter if The Doctor
regenerates into a smaller body?? Or vice-versa??
If (whatever) can happen in a Male --> Male transition,
why can't similar happen in a Male --> Female transition
or in a Female -> Male transition??
That is tantamount to condoning abortion at all stages of
pregnancy. What about the life of the unborn child?
re-generation, would DoctorMatt start off with a Toothache and
require a visit to The Dentist quick smart??
Does The TARDIS have a Doctor (MD), Dentist, etc., on
Speed-Dial?? ;-P
I think we are over-analysing stuff a bit too much now!
It's time to go off and write down some train numbers...
thought 'What if regional Erie is still on Steam Trains??'.
One wouldn't want to make an ASSUMPTION, would one!! ;-)
--
Daniel
The True loon let loose with:
On 02/01/2025 22:09, solar imbecile wrote:
The True loon let loose with:
That is tantamount to condoning abortion at all stages of pregnancy.
What about the life of the unborn child?
OTOH we don’t even know for certain if Gallifreyan women do
get pregnant. What if they lay eggs instead?
If they laid eggs then they would have to incubate them. Where are the
incubators?
In the buildings of the Gallifreyan Maternity Service, under the
logo of the crossed computers (as mentioned in ‘The Creature
from the Pit’).
Is Romana Dejah Thoris? In any case, how would an egg come
out of a man? The problem still remains. Allowing a pregnant Time Lady
to regenerate into a man is tantamount to murder of the unborn child,
and that includes eggs.
I was specifically addressing your point that it was like allowing
abortion ‘at all stages of pregnancy.’
Eggs are laid at the earliest possible stage of pregnancy, before
the foetus has developed. Once laid they’re outside the mother’s
body and she can regenerate all she likes without having any
effect on the baby whatsoever.
Sorry if I didn’t make that clear enough before.
OTOH if you’re still mammal-centric enough to insist that Time
Ladies have placental pregnancies, then maybe the embryo isn’t
reabsorbed right away. While the newly-male mother is still
still within the first fifteen hours of their regeneration cycle, there’s >enough residual regeneration energy to allow another regeneration
back to female and continue the pregnancy as before.
(The regeneration cycle thing was established back in ‘The
Christmas Invasion’, so even you should accept it as canonical!)
--
solar penguin
The True Doctor wrote on 3/1/25 10:29 am:
On 02/01/2025 09:58, Daniel70 wrote:
The True Doctor wrote on 2/1/25 12:27 pm:
On 30/12/2024 08:54, Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <vkr29m$s2kr$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
John Hall wrote on 28/12/24 9:35 pm:
That would pretty much rule out any
relationships for the Doctor, since female Time
Lords are few and far between,
How would we know?? I mean the few times we have
seen the High Council of The Time Lords, I'm sure
I saw some Females.
Even if you didn't see any, some of the male Time
Lords on the High Council might become Time Ladies
after their next regeneration. (It's in the show - so
it's canon!)
No it isn't. Nothing after 2017 is canon, and Missy
isn't canon either unless the Master used her form as a
disguise like his other disguises which did not involve
regeneration.
In which Doctor-period did we see a Gualifreyan General
walk off screen and change sex (from M -> F or F -> M)??
Eleventh Doctor, I think. So the suggestion was there
WITH-IN Aggy's 'Doctor Who ended in 2017' time frame.
Even before The Master became Missy!!
Nothing like that happened while the 11th Doctor was around.
Oh!! O.K., thank you for being so HELPFUL, Aggy.
Was it, maybe, with-in the 10th Doctors reign .... or the 12th
Doctors reign that such a transition/regeneration occurred??
Blueshirt wrote on 3/1/25 7:52 pm:
I think we are over-analysing stuff a bit too much now!
It's time to go off and write down some train numbers...
I was going to reply 'A bit of Fresh Air can be good!' ....
but then thought 'What if regional Erie is still on Steam
Trains??'.
One wouldn't want to make an ASSUMPTION, would one!! ;-)
Do you know the relevant part of The Doctor's Wife
I refer to!
Hint: The Corsair!
In article <vl88om$3r0e1$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
Was it, maybe, with-in the 10th Doctors reign .... or the
12th Doctors reign that such a transition/regeneration
occurred??
Well Given The Doctor's Wife ...
Daniel70 wrote:
The True Doctor wrote on 3/1/25 10:29 am:
On 02/01/2025 09:58, Daniel70 wrote:Oh!! O.K., thank you for being so HELPFUL, Aggy.
The True Doctor wrote on 2/1/25 12:27 pm:
On 30/12/2024 08:54, Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <vkr29m$s2kr$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
John Hall wrote on 28/12/24 9:35 pm:
That would pretty much rule out any
relationships for the Doctor, since female Time
Lords are few and far between,
How would we know?? I mean the few times we have
seen the High Council of The Time Lords, I'm sure
I saw some Females.
Even if you didn't see any, some of the male Time
Lords on the High Council might become Time Ladies
after their next regeneration. (It's in the show - so
it's canon!)
No it isn't. Nothing after 2017 is canon, and Missy
isn't canon either unless the Master used her form as a
disguise like his other disguises which did not involve
regeneration.
In which Doctor-period did we see a Gualifreyan General
walk off screen and change sex (from M -> F or F -> M)??
Eleventh Doctor, I think. So the suggestion was there
WITH-IN Aggy's 'Doctor Who ended in 2017' time frame.
Even before The Master became Missy!!
Nothing like that happened while the 11th Doctor was around.
Was it, maybe, with-in the 10th Doctors reign .... or the 12th
Doctors reign that such a transition/regeneration occurred??
The Twelfth Doctor. "Hell Bent" is the episode where 'The
General' regenerated and changed gender whilst doing so, and it
was seen on-screen after the 12th Doctor shot him/her... as we
were talking about here only yesterday. (You do read RADW,
right?)
The Doctor wrote:
In article <vl88om$3r0e1$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
Was it, maybe, with-in the 10th Doctors reign .... or the
12th Doctors reign that such a transition/regeneration
occurred??
Well Given The Doctor's Wife ...
You've got a Bee in your bonnet about "The Doctor's Wife"! We
all know now what Steven Moffat was doing there... like 'Missy'
it was all part of the small-steps process to lead eventually to
a female Doctor.
But, if you are that way inclined (i.e. anti-gender swapping
Time Lord regeneration) then "The Doctor's Wife" is the least of
your problems now!
The Doctor wrote:
Do you know the relevant part of The Doctor's Wife
I refer to!
Hint: The Corsair!
Yes Dave, I am well aware of the Corsair... but he/she is
irrelevant. Time Lord gender-changing regenerations have now
been seen on-screen in the show, not just foreshadowed with a
mention. So as I said to Agamemnon earlier, you can't put the
toothpaste back in to the tube.
You can, if you choose to do so, ignore it, move on, and never
mention it again... but that's your choice. Right or wrong,
gender-changing regenerations have become a part of the show.
Personally, I'd prefer a gender-changing regeneration to a
bi-generation!
Daniel70 wrote:
The True Doctor wrote on 3/1/25 10:29 am:
On 02/01/2025 09:58, Daniel70 wrote:Oh!! O.K., thank you for being so HELPFUL, Aggy.
The True Doctor wrote on 2/1/25 12:27 pm:
On 30/12/2024 08:54, Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <vkr29m$s2kr$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
John Hall wrote on 28/12/24 9:35 pm:
That would pretty much rule out any
relationships for the Doctor, since female Time
Lords are few and far between,
How would we know?? I mean the few times we have
seen the High Council of The Time Lords, I'm sure
I saw some Females.
Even if you didn't see any, some of the male Time
Lords on the High Council might become Time Ladies
after their next regeneration. (It's in the show - so
it's canon!)
No it isn't. Nothing after 2017 is canon, and Missy
isn't canon either unless the Master used her form as a
disguise like his other disguises which did not involve
regeneration.
In which Doctor-period did we see a Gualifreyan General
walk off screen and change sex (from M -> F or F -> M)??
Eleventh Doctor, I think. So the suggestion was there
WITH-IN Aggy's 'Doctor Who ended in 2017' time frame.
Even before The Master became Missy!!
Nothing like that happened while the 11th Doctor was around.
Was it, maybe, with-in the 10th Doctors reign .... or the 12th
Doctors reign that such a transition/regeneration occurred??
The Twelfth Doctor. "Hell Bent" is the episode where 'The
General' regenerated and changed gender whilst doing so, and it
was seen on-screen after the 12th Doctor shot him/her... as we
were talking about here only yesterday. (You do read RADW,
right?)
In article <xn0p0db7r5t317l003@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
The True Doctor wrote on 3/1/25 10:29 am:
On 02/01/2025 09:58, Daniel70 wrote:Oh!! O.K., thank you for being so HELPFUL, Aggy.
The True Doctor wrote on 2/1/25 12:27 pm:
On 30/12/2024 08:54, Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <vkr29m$s2kr$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
John Hall wrote on 28/12/24 9:35 pm:
That would pretty much rule out any
relationships for the Doctor, since female Time
Lords are few and far between,
How would we know?? I mean the few times we have
seen the High Council of The Time Lords, I'm sure
I saw some Females.
Even if you didn't see any, some of the male Time
Lords on the High Council might become Time Ladies
after their next regeneration. (It's in the show - so
it's canon!)
No it isn't. Nothing after 2017 is canon, and Missy
isn't canon either unless the Master used her form as a
disguise like his other disguises which did not involve
regeneration.
In which Doctor-period did we see a Gualifreyan General
walk off screen and change sex (from M -> F or F -> M)??
Eleventh Doctor, I think. So the suggestion was there
WITH-IN Aggy's 'Doctor Who ended in 2017' time frame.
Even before The Master became Missy!!
Nothing like that happened while the 11th Doctor was around.
Was it, maybe, with-in the 10th Doctors reign .... or the 12th
Doctors reign that such a transition/regeneration occurred??
The Twelfth Doctor. "Hell Bent" is the episode where 'The
General' regenerated and changed gender whilst doing so, and it
was seen on-screen after the 12th Doctor shot him/her... as we
were talking about here only yesterday. (You do read RADW,
right?)
Remember that was given life in Gaiman's The Doctor's Wife.
On 03/01/2025 15:48, Blueshirt wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
Was it, maybe, with-in the 10th Doctors reign .... or the
12th Doctors reign that such a transition/regeneration
occurred??
The Twelfth Doctor. "Hell Bent" is the episode where 'The
General' regenerated and changed gender whilst doing so, and
it was seen on-screen after the 12th Doctor shot him/her...
as we were talking about here only yesterday. (You do read
RADW, right?)
That was all hallucinated.
What seemed to be happening is that the general who
Capaldi murdered had prior to that event been forcibly
regenerated into a man in order to fight in the Time War
because the Time Lords considered that female soldiers
were inferior and she resented that and made it known to
everyone after she returned to female form.
In article <xn0p0dc7e5udf8o007@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Well Given The Doctor's Wife ...
You've got a Bee in your bonnet about "The Doctor's Wife"! We
all now know what Steven Moffat was doing there... like
'Missy' it was all part of the small-steps process to lead
eventually to a female Doctor.
But, if you are that way inclined (i.e. anti-gender swapping
Time Lord regeneration) then "The Doctor's Wife" is the
least of your problems now!
That is the start point.
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0p0dc7e5udf8o007@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Well Given The Doctor's Wife ...
You've got a Bee in your bonnet about "The Doctor's Wife"! We
all now know what Steven Moffat was doing there... like
'Missy' it was all part of the small-steps process to lead
eventually to a female Doctor.
But, if you are that way inclined (i.e. anti-gender swapping
Time Lord regeneration) then "The Doctor's Wife" is the
least of your problems now!
That is the start point.
Talking about it and actually doing it on-screen are two
different things...
And I would imagine 'it' was on the 'shopping list' given to
Gaiman by the show-runner, Steven Moffat. As it seems to tie-in
with the other foreshadowing that Moffat was doing, so I doubt
it just appeared in the script by accident.
The True Doctor wrote:
On 02/01/2025 15:50, Blueshirt wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
If (whatever) can happen in a Male --> Male transition,
why can't similar happen in a Male --> Female transition
or in a Female -> Male transition??
The real question is... if a female Time Lord regenerates in
to a male Time Lord, do they regenerate wearing her knickers
and a Bra?
All the more reason why Time Lords cannot change gender.
Well, you should really have said "should not change gender",
instead of "cannot change gender"... as we have already seen
examples of it actually happening in the show. So right or
wrong, you can't put the toothpaste back in to the tube, it is
part of the show now. You can thank Steven Moffat for that
change.
It's these important questions that the show should be
dealing with, not messing around with "mavity".
And all the more reason that this series is a hallucination
along with Isaac Newton being turned into an Indian.
There's definitely something ongoing about the "mavity" universe
alright, but you'll have to stay tuned to find out... then we'll
find out the truth about our mate Isaac.
The True Doctor wrote:
On 02/01/2025 22:09, solar imbecile wrote:
The True loon let loose with:
That is tantamount to condoning abortion at all stages of pregnancy.
What about the life of the unborn child?
OTOH we don’t even know for certain if Gallifreyan women do
get pregnant. What if they lay eggs instead?
If they laid eggs then they would have to incubate them. Where are the
incubators?
In the buildings of the Gallifreyan Maternity Service, under the
logo of the crossed computers (as mentioned in ‘The Creature
from the Pit’).
Is Romana Dejah Thoris? In any case, how would an egg come
out of a man? The problem still remains. Allowing a pregnant Time Lady
to regenerate into a man is tantamount to murder of the unborn child,
and that includes eggs.
I was specifically addressing your point that it was like allowing
abortion ‘at all stages of pregnancy.’
Eggs are laid at the earliest possible stage of pregnancy, before
the foetus has developed. Once laid they’re outside the mother’s
body and she can regenerate all she likes without having any
effect on the baby whatsoever.
Sorry if I didn’t make that clear enough before.
OTOH if you’re still mammal-centric enough to insist that Time
Ladies have placental pregnancies, then maybe the embryo isn’t
reabsorbed right away. While the newly-male mother is still
still within the first fifteen hours of their regeneration cycle, there’s enough residual regeneration energy to allow another regeneration
back to female and continue the pregnancy as before.
(The regeneration cycle thing was established back in ‘The
Christmas Invasion’, so even you should accept it as canonical!)
The True Doctor wrote:
On 02/01/2025 22:09, solar imbecile wrote:
The True loon let loose with:
On 02/01/2025 09:48, Daniel70 wrote:
It seems to me that our (male) Doctors have not all been the same size >>>>> and shape.
What happens to that extra matter if The Doctor regenerates into a
smaller body?? Or vice-versa??
If (whatever) can happen in a Male --> Male transition, why can't
similar happen in a Male --> Female transition or in a Female -> Male >>>>> transition??
That is tantamount to condoning abortion at all stages of pregnancy.
What about the life of the unborn child?
Abortions are deliberate. This is more like acknowledging that
miscarriages can happen at all stages of pregnancy.
This is not a miscarriage. It's murder. If the pregnant Time Lady
regenerates into another Time Lady then the foetus would be able to
survive and be born. It can't be born if she has to regenerate into a
man because of a degenerate ill-conceived regeneration process to pander
to a small bunch of woke retards.
You’re getting confused between fact and fiction again.
Chibnall and Moffat didn’t actually murder any actual babies
by writing cross-gender regenerations.
MST3K mantra, and all that.
In article <vl77hg$3i2sd$4@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 02/01/2025 09:58, Daniel70 wrote:
The True Doctor wrote on 2/1/25 12:27 pm:
On 30/12/2024 08:54, Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <vkr29m$s2kr$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
John Hall wrote on 28/12/24 9:35 pm:
That would pretty much rule out any relationships for the
Doctor, since female Time Lords are few and far between,
How would we know?? I mean the few times we have seen the
High Council of The Time Lords, I'm sure I saw some Females.
Even if you didn't see any, some of the male Time Lords on the
High Council might become Time Ladies after their next
regeneration. (It's in the show - so it's canon!)
No it isn't. Nothing after 2017 is canon, and Missy isn't canon either >>>> unless the Master used her form as a disguise like his other disguises >>>> which did not involve regeneration.
In which Doctor-period did we see a Gualifreyan General walk off screen
and change sex (from M -> F or F -> M)??
Eleventh Doctor, I think. So the suggestion was there WITH-IN Aggy's
'Doctor Who ended in 2017' time frame. Even before The Master became
Missy!!
Nothing like that happened while the 11th Doctor was around.
The Doctor's Wife needs some editing like the elimination of the Corsair.
The True Doctor wrote:
On 03/01/2025 15:48, Blueshirt wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
Was it, maybe, with-in the 10th Doctors reign .... or the
12th Doctors reign that such a transition/regeneration
occurred??
The Twelfth Doctor. "Hell Bent" is the episode where 'The
General' regenerated and changed gender whilst doing so, and
it was seen on-screen after the 12th Doctor shot him/her...
as we were talking about here only yesterday. (You do read
RADW, right?)
That was all hallucinated.
If that makes it easier for you, that's fine. I'm not sure the
hallucination thing is going to be written-in to future Doctor
Who lore mind you...
What seemed to be happening is that the general who
Capaldi murdered had prior to that event been forcibly
regenerated into a man in order to fight in the Time War
because the Time Lords considered that female soldiers
were inferior and she resented that and made it known to
everyone after she returned to female form.
I thought you would have a bigger problem with the Doctor
pointing a gun at someone and actually shooting them...
The True Doctor wrote:
On 02/01/2025 08:16, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
No it isn't. Nothing after 2017 is canon, and Missy isn't
canon either unless the Master used her form as a disguise
like his other disguises which did not involve
regeneration.
Er... you must haver missed "Hell Bent". Is that canon then?
Just to freshen your memory... "Hell Bent" featured an
on-screen regeneration where a Time Lord changed sex (male
to female), plus the same regeneration also showed a Time
Lord changing skin colour.
This was in a televised episode of Doctor Who in 2015.
None of this happened just like Kill the Moon didn't happen.
Er... okay.
Do you seriously believe the moon hatched into a plant sized
dragon which then few away in outer space without
catastrophically disturbing the Earth's orbit, and then
somehow the moon regained all of the missing mass out of
nothing and reformed to look exactly like it did before?
Well no, I don't "seriously believe" any of that happened, as
Doctor Who is a fictional TV show! So all of that mumbo-jumbo is
just made-up to entertain us. Clearly that episode didn't
entertain you - or me actually - which is fine, as you can't
please everybody. I just ignore such episodes and try to forget
about them.
These are all hallucinations of the 12th Doctor after he was
shot by the Cybermen in The Doctor Falls, just before he dies.
If that works for you, who am I to argue. It's your head-canon!
I'm pretty sure "Hell Bent" featured Peter Capaldi's
Doctor...
I'm pretty sure neither that nor Kill the Moon actually
happened. Maybe the 12th Doctor was suffering from PTSD from
getting Clara killed and started hallucinating from back then
or the trauma corrupted his memory.
It happened Jim... but not as we know it!
The True Doctor wrote:
On 03/01/2025 15:48, Blueshirt wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
Was it, maybe, with-in the 10th Doctors reign .... or the
12th Doctors reign that such a transition/regeneration
occurred??
The Twelfth Doctor. "Hell Bent" is the episode where 'The
General' regenerated and changed gender whilst doing so, and
it was seen on-screen after the 12th Doctor shot him/her...
as we were talking about here only yesterday. (You do read
RADW, right?)
That was all hallucinated.
If that makes it easier for you, that's fine. I'm not sure the
hallucination thing is going to be written-in to future Doctor
Who lore mind you...
What seemed to be happening is that the general who
Capaldi murdered had prior to that event been forcibly
regenerated into a man in order to fight in the Time War
because the Time Lords considered that female soldiers
were inferior and she resented that and made it known to
everyone after she returned to female form.
I thought you would have a bigger problem with the Doctor
pointing a gun at someone and actually shooting them...
On 03/01/2025 17:25, The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0p0db7r5t317l003@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
The True Doctor wrote on 3/1/25 10:29 am:
On 02/01/2025 09:58, Daniel70 wrote:Oh!! O.K., thank you for being so HELPFUL, Aggy.
The True Doctor wrote on 2/1/25 12:27 pm:
On 30/12/2024 08:54, Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <vkr29m$s2kr$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
John Hall wrote on 28/12/24 9:35 pm:
That would pretty much rule out any
relationships for the Doctor, since female Time
Lords are few and far between,
How would we know?? I mean the few times we have
seen the High Council of The Time Lords, I'm sure
I saw some Females.
Even if you didn't see any, some of the male Time
Lords on the High Council might become Time Ladies
after their next regeneration. (It's in the show - so
it's canon!)
No it isn't. Nothing after 2017 is canon, and Missy
isn't canon either unless the Master used her form as a
disguise like his other disguises which did not involve
regeneration.
In which Doctor-period did we see a Gualifreyan General
walk off screen and change sex (from M -> F or F -> M)??
Eleventh Doctor, I think. So the suggestion was there
WITH-IN Aggy's 'Doctor Who ended in 2017' time frame.
Even before The Master became Missy!!
Nothing like that happened while the 11th Doctor was around.
Was it, maybe, with-in the 10th Doctors reign .... or the 12th
Doctors reign that such a transition/regeneration occurred??
The Twelfth Doctor. "Hell Bent" is the episode where 'The
General' regenerated and changed gender whilst doing so, and it
was seen on-screen after the 12th Doctor shot him/her... as we
were talking about here only yesterday. (You do read RADW,
right?)
Remember that was given life in Gaiman's The Doctor's Wife.
And we all know now that Gaiman is a pervert and has consequently been >cancelled.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." -William Shatner
On 03/01/2025 15:48, Blueshirt wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
The True Doctor wrote on 3/1/25 10:29 am:
On 02/01/2025 09:58, Daniel70 wrote:Oh!! O.K., thank you for being so HELPFUL, Aggy.
The True Doctor wrote on 2/1/25 12:27 pm:
On 30/12/2024 08:54, Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <vkr29m$s2kr$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
John Hall wrote on 28/12/24 9:35 pm:
That would pretty much rule out any
relationships for the Doctor, since female Time
Lords are few and far between,
How would we know?? I mean the few times we have
seen the High Council of The Time Lords, I'm sure
I saw some Females.
Even if you didn't see any, some of the male Time
Lords on the High Council might become Time Ladies
after their next regeneration. (It's in the show - so
it's canon!)
No it isn't. Nothing after 2017 is canon, and Missy
isn't canon either unless the Master used her form as a
disguise like his other disguises which did not involve
regeneration.
In which Doctor-period did we see a Gualifreyan General
walk off screen and change sex (from M -> F or F -> M)??
Eleventh Doctor, I think. So the suggestion was there
WITH-IN Aggy's 'Doctor Who ended in 2017' time frame.
Even before The Master became Missy!!
Nothing like that happened while the 11th Doctor was around.
Was it, maybe, with-in the 10th Doctors reign .... or the 12th
Doctors reign that such a transition/regeneration occurred??
The Twelfth Doctor. "Hell Bent" is the episode where 'The
General' regenerated and changed gender whilst doing so, and it
was seen on-screen after the 12th Doctor shot him/her... as we
were talking about here only yesterday. (You do read RADW,
right?)
That was all hallucinated. What seemed to be happening is that the
general who Capaldi murdered had prior to that event been forcibly >regenerated into a man in order to fight in the Time War because the
Time Lords considered that female soldiers were inferior and she
resented that and made it known to everyone after she returned to female >form.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." -William Shatner
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0p0dc7e5udf8o007@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Well Given The Doctor's Wife ...
You've got a Bee in your bonnet about "The Doctor's Wife"! We
all now know what Steven Moffat was doing there... like
'Missy' it was all part of the small-steps process to lead
eventually to a female Doctor.
But, if you are that way inclined (i.e. anti-gender swapping
Time Lord regeneration) then "The Doctor's Wife" is the
least of your problems now!
That is the start point.
Talking about it and actually doing it on-screen are two
different things...
And I would imagine 'it' was on the 'shopping list' given to
Gaiman by the show-runner, Steven Moffat. As it seems to tie-in
with the other foreshadowing that Moffat was doing, so I doubt
it just appeared in the script by accident.
On 03/01/2025 21:07, Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0p0dc7e5udf8o007@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Well Given The Doctor's Wife ...
You've got a Bee in your bonnet about "The Doctor's Wife"! We
all now know what Steven Moffat was doing there... like
'Missy' it was all part of the small-steps process to lead
eventually to a female Doctor.
But, if you are that way inclined (i.e. anti-gender swapping
Time Lord regeneration) then "The Doctor's Wife" is the
least of your problems now!
That is the start point.
Talking about it and actually doing it on-screen are two
different things...
And I would imagine 'it' was on the 'shopping list' given to
Gaiman by the show-runner, Steven Moffat. As it seems to tie-in
with the other foreshadowing that Moffat was doing, so I doubt
it just appeared in the script by accident.
This was perversion. The Corsier was characterised and universally
regarded as a mentally unstable pervert.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." -William Shatner
On 02/01/2025 23:42, solar imbecile wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 02/01/2025 22:09, solar imbecile wrote:
The True loon let loose with:
On 02/01/2025 09:48, Daniel70 wrote:
It seems to me that our (male) Doctors have not all been the same size >>>>>> and shape.
What happens to that extra matter if The Doctor regenerates into a >>>>>> smaller body?? Or vice-versa??
If (whatever) can happen in a Male --> Male transition, why can't
similar happen in a Male --> Female transition or in a Female -> Male >>>>>> transition??
That is tantamount to condoning abortion at all stages of pregnancy. >>>>> What about the life of the unborn child?
Abortions are deliberate. This is more like acknowledging that
miscarriages can happen at all stages of pregnancy.
This is not a miscarriage. It's murder. If the pregnant Time Lady
regenerates into another Time Lady then the foetus would be able to
survive and be born. It can't be born if she has to regenerate into a
man because of a degenerate ill-conceived regeneration process to pander >>> to a small bunch of woke retards.
You’re getting confused between fact and fiction again.
Chibnall and Moffat didn’t actually murder any actual babies
Yes they did! Look at how the Timeless Child monster that Chibnall
created was murdered over, and over, and over, and over, and over, and
over ... and over again. Look at the children Moffat murdered on the >battlefield in Boom.
by writing cross-gender regenerations.
How do you know that Whittaker didn't become pregnant when the Master
was in possession of her body?
MST3K mantra, and all that.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." -William Shatner
On 03/01/2025 08:34, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 02/01/2025 15:50, Blueshirt wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
If (whatever) can happen in a Male --> Male transition,
why can't similar happen in a Male --> Female transition
or in a Female -> Male transition??
The real question is... if a female Time Lord regenerates in
to a male Time Lord, do they regenerate wearing her knickers
and a Bra?
All the more reason why Time Lords cannot change gender.
Well, you should really have said "should not change gender",
instead of "cannot change gender"... as we have already seen
examples of it actually happening in the show. So right or
We have seen nothing of the kind. Is the moon a dragon's egg which
hatched into a giant space dragon consisting of 99% of the mass which
then flew away?
wrong, you can't put the toothpaste back in to the tube, it is
part of the show now. You can thank Steven Moffat for that
change.
It's all lies and hallucinations. Is the moon a dragon's egg? Why isn't >Earth's orbit hurtling out of control after 99% of the moon's mass few away?
It's these important questions that the show should be
dealing with, not messing around with "mavity".
And all the more reason that this series is a hallucination
along with Isaac Newton being turned into an Indian.
There's definitely something ongoing about the "mavity" universe
alright, but you'll have to stay tuned to find out... then we'll
find out the truth about our mate Isaac.
The series will hopefully be cancelled before that if it doesn't occur
in Gatwa's second and final season.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." -William Shatner
On 03/01/2025 13:49, solar imbecile wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 02/01/2025 22:09, solar imbecile wrote:
The True loon let loose with:
That is tantamount to condoning abortion at all stages of pregnancy. >>>>> What about the life of the unborn child?
OTOH we don’t even know for certain if Gallifreyan women do
get pregnant. What if they lay eggs instead?
If they laid eggs then they would have to incubate them. Where are the
incubators?
In the buildings of the Gallifreyan Maternity Service, under the
logo of the crossed computers (as mentioned in ‘The Creature
from the Pit’).
Where were they incubated before this service existed?
Is Romana Dejah Thoris? In any case, how would an egg come
out of a man? The problem still remains. Allowing a pregnant Time Lady
to regenerate into a man is tantamount to murder of the unborn child,
and that includes eggs.
I was specifically addressing your point that it was like allowing
abortion ‘at all stages of pregnancy.’
Eggs are laid at the earliest possible stage of pregnancy, before
the foetus has developed. Once laid they’re outside the mother’s
body and she can regenerate all she likes without having any
effect on the baby whatsoever.
Unless she's still incubating an egg or since eggs are usually laid in >clutches many eggs.
Sorry if I didn’t make that clear enough before.
It's still abortion if she regenerates with an egg or many eggs inside her.
OTOH if you’re still mammal-centric enough to insist that Time
Ladies have placental pregnancies, then maybe the embryo isn’t
They have been seen with breasts, nipples, and belly buttons.
reabsorbed right away. While the newly-male mother is still
still within the first fifteen hours of their regeneration cycle, there’s >> enough residual regeneration energy to allow another regeneration
back to female and continue the pregnancy as before.
If they regenerated from a woman into a man while pregnant then that
means they can't control their regenerations so why would the be able to >force themselves to regenerate again back into a woman? All the more
reason why Time Lords can't change gender while regenerating.
(The regeneration cycle thing was established back in ‘The
Christmas Invasion’, so even you should accept it as canonical!)
Tennant only regenerated a hand, not a uterus and a vagina.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." -William Shatner
On 03/01/2025 21:07, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 03/01/2025 15:48, Blueshirt wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
Was it, maybe, with-in the 10th Doctors reign .... or the
12th Doctors reign that such a transition/regeneration
occurred??
The Twelfth Doctor. "Hell Bent" is the episode where 'The
General' regenerated and changed gender whilst doing so, and
it was seen on-screen after the 12th Doctor shot him/her...
as we were talking about here only yesterday. (You do read
RADW, right?)
That was all hallucinated.
If that makes it easier for you, that's fine. I'm not sure the
hallucination thing is going to be written-in to future Doctor
Who lore mind you...
I've already written it. How can the moon lose 99% of it's mass which
flies away in the form of a space dragon and the orbit of the Earth is
not affected, nor are scientific instruments including mirrors placed on
the surface of the moon? Why is NASA/s moon buggy still there? Why are
Neil Armstrong's and Buzz Aldrin's footprints still there? Why are we >observing exactly the same craters in exactly the same places if the
moon was an egg which cracked open and hatched a dragon? Why didn't any
huge pieces of it crash into the Earth and wipe out all life?
What seemed to be happening is that the general who
Capaldi murdered had prior to that event been forcibly
regenerated into a man in order to fight in the Time War
because the Time Lords considered that female soldiers
were inferior and she resented that and made it known to
everyone after she returned to female form.
I thought you would have a bigger problem with the Doctor
pointing a gun at someone and actually shooting them...
I already said at the start he murdered the general.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." -William Shatner
On 1/3/2025 03:52, Daniel70 wrote:
solar penguin wrote on 3/1/25 7:52 pm:
The idiot insisted:Didn't you know, Solar Penguin?? It seems I'm the 'Binky
In article <vl6aam$3d1cc$1@dont-email.me>, solar penguin
<solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
Binky bleated:
In article <vl5ndd$39kjf$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel70
<daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
It seems to me that our (male) Doctors have not all been
the same size and shape.
What happens to that extra matter if The Doctor
regenerates into a smaller body?? Or vice-versa??
If (whatever) can happen in a Male --> Male transition,
why can't similar happen in a Male --> Female transition
or in a Female -> Male transition??
Bogus their Neil Gaiman!
What is bogussing and why do you want Daniel to do it to
somebody’s Neil Gaiman? (How many Neil Gaimans are there
anyway?)
REcall The Doctor's Wife by ...
It was by Neil Gaiman.
That still doesn’t explain why:
a. Gaiman is somebody’s,
b. Gaiman needs to be bogussed,
and
c. Daniel is the person to do it.
appointed' 'Neil Gaiman' BOGUS-er!! (Whatever the HELL that is!!)
Is this a salaried position? If so, is Binky going to be writing the
checks?
Daniel70 wrote:
Blueshirt wrote on 3/1/25 7:52 pm:
I think we are over-analysing stuff a bit too much now!I was going to reply 'A bit of Fresh Air can be good!' ....
It's time to go off and write down some train numbers...
but then thought 'What if regional Erie is still on Steam
Trains??'.
1) The air would still be fresher outside, plus I could touch
grass...
2) Steam locomotives have numbers too.
win/win!
One wouldn't want to make an ASSUMPTION, would one!! ;-)
Never assume.... unless you have a high-speed inter-city rail
service down there in Oz than can top our mighty Enterprise
service that rattles along serenely at 80 kph without spilling
yer tea. (And that's what it's really all about at the end of
the day, isn't it?!)
In article <vl9uau$4f20$2@dont-email.me>, The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 03/01/2025 08:34, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 02/01/2025 15:50, Blueshirt wrote:
It's these important questions that the show should be
dealing with, not messing around with "mavity".
And all the more reason that this series is a hallucination
along with Isaac Newton being turned into an Indian.
There's definitely something ongoing about the "mavity" universe
alright, but you'll have to stay tuned to find out... then we'll
find out the truth about our mate Isaac.
The series will hopefully be cancelled before that if it doesn't
occur in Gatwa's second and final season.
3rd seaon is filming with Bad Wolf :-(
In article <xn0p0czxo5drjwe006@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
The True Doctor wrote on 2/1/25 12:24 pm:
On 29/12/2024 09:28, Blueshirt wrote:Sorry, where (apart from in your mind) has it been STATED that
Daniel70 wrote:
Well, we've had a female Master and a male Doctor, plus a
female Doctor with a male Master... so romances couldn't
be entirely ruled out. As unlikely as they might seem to
us now.
Maybe it's something RTD will throw in to the mix one day?!
What if the woman is forced to regenerate while pregnant?
The foetus would die. That's why Time Lords cannot change
gender and that along with the Timeless Child monster is why
Doctor Who ended in 2017.
'Time Lords cannot change gender', Aggy??
The fact that we have seen it happen on-screen in the show means
that it can't be stated anywhere!
So apart from it being Agamemnon's opinion, there was nothing
whatsoever actually stopping it from happening... so it
happened! Aggy might not like Time Lord's changing their gender,
but it is part of Doctor Who lore now.
Of course you have to back to the Doctor's Wife to fix that.
In article <vl866o$3qj9s$2@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The True Doctor wrote on 2/1/25 12:24 pm:
On 29/12/2024 09:28, Blueshirt wrote:Sorry, where (apart from in your mind) has it been STATED that 'Time
Daniel70 wrote:
John Hall wrote on 28/12/24 9:35 pm:
unless you want him to have a bromance with the Master, which
doesn't bear thinking about.
So why, oh, why did YOU make us think of it, John?? ;-P
Well, we've had a female Master and a male Doctor, plus a female
Doctor with a male Master... so romances couldn't be entirely ruled
out. As unlikely as they might seem to us now.
Maybe it's something RTD will throw in to the mix one day?!
What if the woman is forced to regenerate while pregnant? The foetus
would die. That's why Time Lords cannot change gender and that along
with the Timeless Child monster is why Doctor Who ended in 2017.
Lords cannot change gender', Aggy??
Hence the Need to retcon the Doctor's Wife.
The True Doctor wrote:
On 30/12/2024 16:40, Blueshirt wrote:
"Doctor Who" - as a show - likes its "fixed points" in time,
things that the Doctor can't alter. So yes, Gallifrey has
been destroyed and once again the Doctor is the last
surviving Time Lord... or so he believes.
It wasn't put into a time-loop so this destruction can easily
be undone.
My guess is it will be undone... at some stage.
And if it is the 15th Doctor that does it... we all know that he
will be crying with joy.
This proves that the Timeless Child monster and everything
connected with it is a hallucination by Capaldi in his last
milliseconds of life.
Hmmm... I wouldn't go THAT far now!
However, I am sure that if an Executive Producer of Doctor
Who needs to change that to suit a future storyline, they
will.
It will be interesting to see who Anita Dobson's character in
S2/S15 actually is and where she's from, as it seems likely
that
No one cares.
You cared enough to reply "no one cares", as opposed to just
ignoring my comment... so that means you care!
On 03/01/2025 08:34, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
These are all hallucinations of the 12th Doctor after he was shot
by the Cybermen in The Doctor Falls, just before he dies.
If that works for you, who am I to argue. It's your head-canon!
It's fact. Can you seriously believe that the Doctor bi-generated?
And not only that but the TARDIS as well, after being clubbed with a
circus mallet? How much more ridiculous can you get? Um... well,
apart from Kill the Moon and Isaac Newton being Indian?
Daniel70 wrote:
The True Doctor wrote on 3/1/25 10:29 am:
On 02/01/2025 09:58, Daniel70 wrote:
Oh!! O.K., thank you for being so HELPFUL, Aggy.In which Doctor-period did we see a Gualifreyan General
walk off screen and change sex (from M -> F or F -> M)??
Eleventh Doctor, I think. So the suggestion was there
WITH-IN Aggy's 'Doctor Who ended in 2017' time frame.
Even before The Master became Missy!!
Nothing like that happened while the 11th Doctor was around.
Was it, maybe, with-in the 10th Doctors reign .... or the 12th
Doctors reign that such a transition/regeneration occurred??
The Twelfth Doctor. "Hell Bent" is the episode where 'The
General' regenerated and changed gender whilst doing so, and it
was seen on-screen after the 12th Doctor shot him/her... as we
were talking about here only yesterday. (You do read RADW,
right?)
On 03/01/2025 17:25, The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0p0db7r5t317l003@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
The True Doctor wrote on 3/1/25 10:29 am:
On 02/01/2025 09:58, Daniel70 wrote:
Oh!! O.K., thank you for being so HELPFUL, Aggy.In which Doctor-period did we see a Gualifreyan General
walk off screen and change sex (from M -> F or F -> M)??
Eleventh Doctor, I think. So the suggestion was there
WITH-IN Aggy's 'Doctor Who ended in 2017' time frame.
Even before The Master became Missy!!
Nothing like that happened while the 11th Doctor was around.
Was it, maybe, with-in the 10th Doctors reign .... or the 12th
Doctors reign that such a transition/regeneration occurred??
The Twelfth Doctor. "Hell Bent" is the episode where 'The
General' regenerated and changed gender whilst doing so, and it
was seen on-screen after the 12th Doctor shot him/her... as we
were talking about here only yesterday. (You do read RADW,
right?)
Remember that was given life in Gaiman's The Doctor's Wife.
And we all know now that Gaiman is a pervert and has consequently been cancelled.