| Sysop: | Amessyroom |
|---|---|
| Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
| Users: | 42 |
| Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
| Uptime: | 00:44:42 |
| Calls: | 220 |
| Calls today: | 1 |
| Files: | 824 |
| Messages: | 121,521 |
| Posted today: | 6 |
Has Elon kept the tradition alive by fathering a Donald Musk yet?I'd be more worried about all the Elon's that might be coming down the turnpike!!
On 08/11/2024 20:30, Blueshirt wrote:
So what I said wasn't fake news then, was it? People, like
you and Dave, were against a female Doctor from the
beginning.
Yes it was. Totally fake news.
Everyone has the right to be against a female Doctor from the
beginning.
That was my point, so why try and make out otherwise? It had
nothing to do with Jodie's first episode or the Timeless
Child arc.
You totally deranged and lunatic point was that everyone
should have ignored all the facts and agreed with your stupid
uninformed and ignorant opinion, propaganda and lies.
I was pointing out your bullshit and revisionism. Not liking
the Timeless Child is fine... I didn't like it much either.
You are the one who posted bullshit and revisionism. No one is
obliged to accept your retarded woke views and accept a female
Doctor before they have proven themselves.
As I said, some people were against Jodie Whittaker's casting
from day one just because she was a woman.
The Doctor is a MALE character. A male character cannot be
played by a woman.
entitled to their views but trying to pretend it was because
Jodie didn't play the character well or it was because of the
eventuality that became the Timeless Child is historical
revisionism, aka BULLSHIT.
Your claims are historical revisionism, They facts show that
over 10 million viewers gave Whittaker a chance.
In article <vgm4ks$3cr8r$1@dont-email.me>,is
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 08/11/2024 20:30, Blueshirt wrote:
people are entitled to their views but trying to pretend it
was because Jodie didn't play the character well or it was
because of the eventuality that became the Timeless Child
historical revisionism, aka BULLSHIT.
Your claims are historical revisionism, They facts show that
over 10 million viewers gave Whittaker a chance. I even
wrote a female Doctor story and posted it to this group.
Both Chibnall and Whittaker failed to impress and the
Timeless Child monster and Chibnall's insane childish fan
fiction totally destroyed the show.
Good one AGA.
The Doctor wrote on 9/11/24 1:29 am:
In article <vgkmrd$356ir$2@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
solar penguin wrote on 7/11/24 8:05 pm:
Idlehands informed us:Maybe that's why his parents keep him in the Basement .... so he doesn't >>> have to wear any pants at all!!
On 2024-11-06 7:21 a.m., Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Tim did say his older girlfirnd left him a cat while she moved
out of state.
The cat wouldn't care... as long as somebody fed it.
Binky's cats took over most of his basement hideaway, they
left him the litter box to hang out with.
Binky is toilet trained enough to use a litter box??? Wow!
I thought he just soiled his pants and didn’t even notice!
Now, there's a sight NOT for sore eyes!!
Sorry Dannyboy, but you must believing Idlehands' lies.
MUST I, Gobble-de-gook??
--
Daniel
The Doctor wrote:
In article <vgm4ks$3cr8r$1@dont-email.me>,is
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 08/11/2024 20:30, Blueshirt wrote:
people are entitled to their views but trying to pretend it
was because Jodie didn't play the character well or it was
because of the eventuality that became the Timeless Child
historical revisionism, aka BULLSHIT.
Your claims are historical revisionism, They facts show that
over 10 million viewers gave Whittaker a chance. I even
wrote a female Doctor story and posted it to this group.
Both Chibnall and Whittaker failed to impress and the
Timeless Child monster and Chibnall's insane childish fan
fiction totally destroyed the show.
Good one AGA.
No it wasn't a good one... it was the manifesto of somebody who
is anti-Doctor who and hasn't liked much about Doctor Who for
years, because it isn't made the way it used to be or he would
like it to be. And his entitled point of view, like your
deranged views, are the only propaganda being posted here.
BUT, at least AGA discusses things, something that you are
incapable of doing.
In article <xn0ot3w8h7suwjr001@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
BUT, at least AGA discusses things, something that you are
incapable of doing.
The Timeless child is extremely anti-Doctor Who!!
The True Doctor wrote on 8/11/24 10:31 pm:
<Snip>
Has Elon kept the tradition alive by fathering a Donald Musk yet?I'd be more worried about all the Elon's that might be coming down the >turnpike!!
--
Daniel
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0ot3w8h7suwjr001@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
BUT, at least AGA discusses things, something that you are
incapable of doing.
The Timeless child is extremely anti-Doctor Who!!
I rest my case...
In article <xn0ot3zvl7xu9m7000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0ot3w8h7suwjr001@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
BUT, at least AGA discusses things, something that you are
incapable of doing.
The Timeless child is extremely anti-Doctor Who!!
I rest my case...
You have none.
The True Doctor wrote:
On 08/11/2024 20:30, Blueshirt wrote:
So what I said wasn't fake news then, was it? People, like
you and Dave, were against a female Doctor from the
beginning.
Yes it was. Totally fake news.
How can it be fake when both of you were posting messages here
since the day Jodie was cast as the 13th Doctor complaining
about it? In your case, even saying Chris Chibnall should be
sacked!
Or, maybe you believe in alternative facts? In which case, you
lose the argument for being an idiot.
(As an aside, reading your old rants I wonder why you are even
here as you come across more like someone who is an anti-Doctor
Who... even Steven Moffat didn't escape your wrath.)
Everyone has the right to be against a female Doctor from the
beginning.
Correct. It's the pretending - like Dave does - that it is the
Timeless Child that was the issue. He is a woman hating
Christian fundamentalist, he didn't approve of Jodie Whittaker
or her 13th Doctor from day one... the Timeless Child had
nothing whatsoever to do with it. (Which is where this
incarnation of the discussion started.)
That was my point, so why try and make out otherwise? It had
nothing to do with Jodie's first episode or the Timeless
Child arc.
You totally deranged and lunatic point was that everyone
should have ignored all the facts and agreed with your stupid
uninformed and ignorant opinion, propaganda and lies.
That's your rebuttal is it? Nice one. My point is the
revisionist smoke-screen some fans like to put up to make it
seem that they are not misogynists and there were in-universe
reasons for not liking the 13th Doctor. (Dave still won't even
refer to the 13th Doctor!) Some people in fandom wanted the 13th
Doctor to fail from the very beginning, this is not propaganda
or a lie.
Your rants here were quite predictable though and you are
[reasonably] consistent, I will give you that.
I was pointing out your bullshit and revisionism. Not liking
the Timeless Child is fine... I didn't like it much either.
You are the one who posted bullshit and revisionism. No one is
obliged to accept your retarded woke views and accept a female
Doctor before they have proven themselves.
BUT, you wanted Chris Chibnall sacked the day after Jodie
Whittaker was cast... how is that giving Whittaker or Chibnall a
chance?
As I said, some people were against Jodie Whittaker's casting
from day one just because she was a woman.
The Doctor is a MALE character. A male character cannot be
played by a woman.
In your opinion.
entitled to their views but trying to pretend it was because
Jodie didn't play the character well or it was because of the
eventuality that became the Timeless Child is historical
revisionism, aka BULLSHIT.
Your claims are historical revisionism, They facts show that
over 10 million viewers gave Whittaker a chance.
Judging by your posts here, and replies to others, you didn't
give her much of a chance. Any claims otherwise by you are
just confounded lies.
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0ot2d01w81p0001@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
chibnall/Whittakers Adventures of the Timeless Child
is a real low point!
Are you still going on about the Timeless Child?!
Get over it and move on... Christmas is coming and the 15th
Doctor will be back!
The REAL 14th you mean.
No Dave, I don't... and neither does anybody else, as we all
know that Ncuti Gatwa is officially the 15th Doctor. Nothing you
say or do is going to change that.
But you have just clarified for everybody why your internet
company is called NotKnow... as you know nothing!!!
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0ot3zvl7xu9m7000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0ot3w8h7suwjr001@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
BUT, at least AGA discusses things, something that you are
incapable of doing.
The Timeless child is extremely anti-Doctor Who!!
I rest my case...
You have none.
Like your brain cells is it?
On 08/11/2024 14:44, Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0ot2d01w81p0001@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
chibnall/Whittakers Adventures of the Timeless Child
is a real low point!
Are you still going on about the Timeless Child?!
Get over it and move on... Christmas is coming and the 15th
Doctor will be back!
The REAL 14th you mean.
No Dave, I don't... and neither does anybody else, as we all
know that Ncuti Gatwa is officially the 15th Doctor. Nothing you
say or do is going to change that.
Ncuti Gatwa is officially nothing since Doctor Who ended in 2017. The
last Doctor was Peter Capaldi, the so called 12th but really the 14th
Doctor counting John Hurt, and David Tennant twice.
But you have just clarified for everybody why your internet
company is called NotKnow... as you know nothing!!!
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." -William Shatner
On 09/11/2024 12:01, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 08/11/2024 20:30, Blueshirt wrote:
So what I said wasn't fake news then, was it? People, like
you and Dave, were against a female Doctor from the
beginning.
Yes it was. Totally fake news.
How can it be fake when both of you were posting messages here
since the day Jodie was cast as the 13th Doctor complaining
about it? In your case, even saying Chris Chibnall should be
sacked!
Most Doctor Who fans thought the same way. Saying otherwise is fake news.
Or, maybe you believe in alternative facts? In which case, you
lose the argument for being an idiot.
There are no alternative facts. Almost everyone thought gender swapping
the Doctor was a stupid gimmick that would fail.
(As an aside, reading your old rants I wonder why you are even
here as you come across more like someone who is an anti-Doctor
Who... even Steven Moffat didn't escape your wrath.)
I supported Moffat until he went woke. There is no place for wokery in
Doctor Who or anywhere. It's fascist Marxist totalitarian thought
control. Doctor Who ended in 2017 when it became everything it stood
against.
Everyone has the right to be against a female Doctor from the
beginning.
Correct. It's the pretending - like Dave does - that it is the
Timeless Child that was the issue. He is a woman hating
It's not pretending. It's a fact. Whittaker and Gatwa could both
have been put up with until they were sacked. The Timeless Child monster >totally destroyed Doctor Who. The Doctor is not an kidnapped abused
child from another dimension that was repeatedly experimented on and >murdered, kept changing race and gender for no reason whatsoever, and
then was turned into a genocidal killer, then fled because of its
crimes, was caught and had it's memory erased before being turned into >William Hartnell as a boy.
Christian fundamentalist, he didn't approve of Jodie Whittaker
or her 13th Doctor from day one... the Timeless Child had
He doesn't hate women. When did he ever complain about any of the female >companions? Whittaker was a terrible choice of actor to play the Doctor. >Everyone with any common sense knows that.
nothing whatsoever to do with it. (Which is where this
incarnation of the discussion started.)
The Timeless Child monster has everything to do with it. Whittaker was >tolerated until she was sacked. The Timeless Child monster cannot be >tolerated.
That was my point, so why try and make out otherwise? It had
nothing to do with Jodie's first episode or the Timeless
Child arc.
You totally deranged and lunatic point was that everyone
should have ignored all the facts and agreed with your stupid
uninformed and ignorant opinion, propaganda and lies.
That's your rebuttal is it? Nice one. My point is the
revisionist smoke-screen some fans like to put up to make it
seem that they are not misogynists and there were in-universe
reasons for not liking the 13th Doctor. (Dave still won't even
You are the revisionist. Not liking your favourite character gender
swapped for a stupid woke gimmick is not misogynistic. It's pure common >sensed.
refer to the 13th Doctor!) Some people in fandom wanted the 13th
Doctor to fail from the very beginning, this is not propaganda
or a lie.
They knew she would fail from the very start. Nothing to do with
wanting. It was a stupid gimmick.
Your rants here were quite predictable though and you are
[reasonably] consistent, I will give you that.
My rants were reasonable common sense which the majority agreed or would >agree with.
I was pointing out your bullshit and revisionism. Not liking
the Timeless Child is fine... I didn't like it much either.
You are the one who posted bullshit and revisionism. No one is
obliged to accept your retarded woke views and accept a female
Doctor before they have proven themselves.
BUT, you wanted Chris Chibnall sacked the day after Jodie
Whittaker was cast... how is that giving Whittaker or Chibnall a
chance?
Turning the Doctor who is a MALE CHARACTER into a woman was a totally
stupid and illogical idea. Of course Chibnall deserved to be sacked and >eventually he was, but it was too late because he had already destroyed >Doctor Who with the Timeless Child monster. Whittaker was give a chance
to prove herself and she failed. Everyone with any sense knew she was a >terrible actress. Only Joanna Lumley could have played the role, but
only after Tom Baker, not after 13 previous male incarnations.
As I said, some people were against Jodie Whittaker's casting
from day one just because she was a woman.
The Doctor is a MALE character. A male character cannot be
played by a woman.
In your opinion.
This is an absolute literary FACT not an opinion. The Doctor is written
acts, thinks, speaks, and behaves in the manner of a man. That makes him
a male character.
entitled to their views but trying to pretend it was because
Jodie didn't play the character well or it was because of the
eventuality that became the Timeless Child is historical
revisionism, aka BULLSHIT.
Your claims are historical revisionism, They facts show that
over 10 million viewers gave Whittaker a chance.
Judging by your posts here, and replies to others, you didn't
give her much of a chance. Any claims otherwise by you are
just confounded lies.
She was given a chance and she failed to prove herself. Giving someone a >chance doesn't mean you have to agree with them. It means they have to
prove you wrong. They didn't.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." -William Shatner
On 09/11/2024 12:01, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 08/11/2024 20:30, Blueshirt wrote:
So what I said wasn't fake news then, was it? People, like you
and Dave, were against a female Doctor from the beginning.
Yes it was. Totally fake news.
How can it be fake when both of you were posting messages here
since the day Jodie was cast as the 13th Doctor complaining about
it? In your case, even saying Chris Chibnall should be sacked!
Most Doctor Who fans thought the same way. Saying otherwise is fake
news.
Or, maybe you believe in alternative facts? In which case, you
lose the argument for being an idiot.
There are no alternative facts. Almost everyone thought gender
swapping the Doctor was a stupid gimmick that would fail.
(As an aside, reading your old rants I wonder why you are even
here as you come across more like someone who is an anti-Doctor
Who... even Steven Moffat didn't escape your wrath.)
I supported Moffat until he went woke. There is no place for wokery
in Doctor Who or anywhere. It's fascist Marxist totalitarian thought
control. Doctor Who ended in 2017 when it became everything it stood
against.
The Timeless Child monster has everything to do with it. Whittaker
was tolerated until she was sacked. The Timeless Child monster
cannot be tolerated.
refer to the 13th Doctor!) Some people in fandom wanted the 13th
Doctor to fail from the very beginning, this is not propaganda or
a lie.
They knew she would fail from the very start. Nothing to do with
wanting. It was a stupid gimmick.
Your rants here were quite predictable though and you are
[reasonably] consistent, I will give you that.
My rants were reasonable common sense which the majority agreed or
would agree with.
As I said, some people were against Jodie Whittaker's casting
from day one just because she was a woman.
The Doctor is a MALE character. A male character cannot be
played by a woman.
In your opinion.
This is an absolute literary FACT not an opinion.
The Doctor is written acts, thinks, speaks, and behaves in the
manner of a man. That makes him a male character.
entitled to their views but trying to pretend it was because
Jodie didn't play the character well or it was because of the
eventuality that became the Timeless Child is historical
revisionism, aka BULLSHIT.
Your claims are historical revisionism, They facts show that
over 10 million viewers gave Whittaker a chance.
Judging by your posts here, and replies to others, you didn't give
her much of a chance. Any claims otherwise by you are just
confounded lies.
She was given a chance
and she failed to prove herself. Giving someone a chance doesn't mean
you have to agree with them.
It means they have to prove you wrong. They didn't.
The Doctor wrote on 16/11/24 12:38 pm:
In article <vh8ohr$3l8sr$3@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
<Snip>
Songs of Praise has been unwatchable ever since they got rid of Aled
Jones because he was Welsh. No, I mean because he was heterosexual.
Aled does still host.
Oh No!! Could this be the end of the Aggy<->Gobble-de-gook partnership?? ;-P
--
Daniel
The Doctor wrote on 16/11/24 5:26 pm:
In article <vh8uu5$3mo09$1@dont-email.me>, Your NameYeah, that's right, Gobble-de-gook, I'm sure, when God was creating The
<YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:
On 2024-11-15 23:47:05 +0000, Blueshirt said:
Your Name wrote:
On 2024-11-15 20:37:33 +0000, Blueshirt said:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0otcdd2gfuexa004@post.eweka.nl>, Blueshirt
<blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
KJV no NKJV !!
Same fiction, just modernised with some different
words...
So obviously too modern for the blinkered Christian
fundamentalists of this world.
It is history not fiction.
I prefer the term, believed to be historical...
Believed to be historical by morons with no braincells. :-)
I was being polite...
Everyone else knows it complete and utter crap, full of
contradictions, misleading nonsense, heavily edited by the
Church leaders (including deleting whole books they didn't
like), and more.
Well, not everyone... there's at least one person here who likes
to think the bible is 100% true.
I did say "everyone else". :-) We already knew the local village
idiot fits into the "no braincells" category.
Said the decevived ones!
Earth 6,000 years ago, God could have inserted bones that he had made to >appear around 150,000,000 years old into all that dirt he was making!!
Easy done ..... for GOD!! ;-P
--
Daniel
Blueshirt wrote on 16/11/24 12:14 am:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 13/11/2024 20:42, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
<Snip>
No, No, No, Blueshirt, cause if Aggy did that he might not be able to4/5 of the audience has already left. Doctor Who belongs to
the long term fans who made it the success it was and are
nearly all male, not the degenerate piece of shit woke
retards to use to propagate their vile hatred of the fans
and disseminate woke propaganda which they use to sexually
groom children.
Casual viewers come and go with every show on television.
Everyone has the right to switch off something they don't
like. I don't think "sexual grooming" has much to do with
it though.
I don't not want my licence fee money being spent on sexually
grooming and indoctrinating children and neither do the
majority of licence fee payers.
You need to move from the UK then.
watch a program that he obviously LOVES!!
(Note Aggy's "I *don't not* ..." ... is a double negative so changes to
YES, so Aggy DOES want his licence fee money being spent on sexually >grooming....". ;-P )
--
Daniel
The idiot insisted:
In article <vh8uu5$3mo09$1@dont-email.me>,
Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:
We already knew the local village idiot fits into the "no braincells"
category.
Said the decevived ones!
The ones who are ten times as evived as usual?
Interesting. How do you evive someone anyway?
--
solar penguin
The idiot insisted:
In article <vh9nla$3uk25$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
Yeah, that's right, Gobble-de-gook, I'm sure, when God was
creating The Earth 6,000 years ago, God could have inserted
bones that he had made to appear around 150,000,000 years
old into all that dirt he was making!!
Easy done ..... for GOD!! ;-P
Or Satan.
You’re claiming that Satan created the Earth? Interesting.
--
solar penguin
The Doctor wrote on 16/11/24 3:06 am:
In article <vh758r$3bnvo$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
Idlehands wrote on 15/11/24 4:45 pm:
On 2024-11-14 6:47 a.m., Daniel70 wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 14/11/24 11:49 pm:
<Snip>
I have NO idea why YOU, Gobble-de-gook, are asking ME this question!!Idlehands has not logic otherwise he would go to
*PIG'S ARSE!!*
Go to ????
Gobble-de-gook DID include a link .... which I deleted because it didn't >>> add anything to this discussion.
His embracing of Trump and all he represents is somewhat amusing but
demonstrates what happens when someone shuts off their brain (?) and
follow the mob.
Binky should truck on down the to States and walk into a Christian
National Church, it might open his eyes.
So Lying Idlehands , why is the UCC dwindling?
Blueshirt wrote on 16/11/24 12:14 am:
The True Doctor wrote:
I don't not want my licence fee money being spent on
sexually grooming and indoctrinating children and neither
do the majority of licence fee payers.
You need to move from the UK then.
No, No, No, Blueshirt, cause if Aggy did that he might not be
able to watch a program that he obviously LOVES!!
Or Satan.
The idiot insisted:
In article <vhaafc$2b9g$1@dont-email.me>,
solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
You’re claiming that Satan created the Earth? Interesting.
Nope! Satan creating Evolution.
So you’re just claiming Satan is responsible for creating all
living species on Earth.
On 15/11/2024 13:13, Blueshirt wrote:
1) Is there any TV show that you think hasn't been destroyed
by "woke perverts"?
Currently there doesn't seem to be as regards most fantasy and
science fiction. Reacher is OK and people have said Cobra Kai
is unaffected but I don't have Netflix so haven't seen it.
You do seem to be the expert at spotting that sort of thing.
2) Is there any TV show that you do actually like?
Reacher, Fallout, House of the Dragon.
It must be hard life going around being anti-everything.
Surely there is a glimmer of hope on the horizon with
something you do like to sit down and watch. Let me guess,
Songs of Praise?
Songs of Praise has been unwatchable ever since they got rid
of Aled Jones because he was Welsh. No, I mean because he was
heterosexual.
The Doctor wrote:
Or Satan.
+ + + + BREAKING NEWS + + + +
Satan does not exist Dave. He is a made-up figure, a bit like
the bogeyman.
Sorry to be the bearer of sad news once again but it is a simple
fact.
The Doctor wrote on 16/11/24 3:07 am:
In article <vh75p1$3bqvj$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 15/11/24 1:03 am:
In article <vh4v8a$2r6ib$4@dont-email.me>, Daniel70
<daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 14/11/24 11:51 pm:
<Snip>
Not having a clue what 'keping up' is .... I'd agree with YOURYou would love Shetland!
Never been there. Didn't even make it to Lock Ness when I was in
Europe/U.K.
You're not keping up.
statement, Gobble-de-gook .... for a change!!
Will wonders never cease??
Hmmm!! My Spell-Checker offered "Peking" as an alternative for "keping"
.... but I've no idea why YOU, Gobble-de-gook, might want to discuss
"Peking"!!
Never heard of the BBC's Shetland I see.
Been watching it for years ........ Just got a Female DCI a couple of Eps ago!!
Daniel70 wrote:
Blueshirt wrote on 16/11/24 12:14 am:
The True Doctor wrote:No, No, No, Blueshirt, cause if Aggy did that he might not be
I don't not want my licence fee money being spent on
sexually grooming and indoctrinating children and neither
do the majority of licence fee payers.
You need to move from the UK then.
able to watch a program that he obviously LOVES!!
Well, I don't live in the UK, I don't pay for a TV licence -
British or Irish - and I still watch the TV show that I have
loved since I was a child... so it can be done! ;-)
On 2024-11-16 20:07:13 +0000, Blueshirt said:
Well, I don't live in the UK, I don't pay for a TV licence -
British or Irish - and I still watch the TV show that I have
loved since I was a child... so it can be done! ;-)
You pay your "TV licence" to Disney instead. ;-)
(Unless you use the naughty web to download the episodes.)
The idiot insisted:
In article <vh8uu5$3mo09$1@dont-email.me>,
Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:
We already knew the local village idiot fits into the "no braincells"
category.
Said the decevived ones!
The ones who are ten times as evived as usual?
Interesting. How do you evive someone anyway?
On 2024-11-16 20:11:53 +0000, Blueshirt said:
The Doctor wrote:
Or Satan.
+ + + + BREAKING NEWS + + + +
Satan does not exist Dave. He is a made-up figure, a bit like
the bogeyman.
Sorry to be the bearer of sad news once again but it is a simple
fact.
Satana does exist
... Americans just voted himin as their next President. He's orange,
wears awful wigs to hide the horns on his head, tells lies and
misinformation without blinking an eye, incites riots, commits criminal
acts, ... :-p
On 2024-11-16 21:08:57 +0000, Your Name said:
On 2024-11-16 20:11:53 +0000, Blueshirt said:
The Doctor wrote:
Or Satan.
+ + + + BREAKING NEWS + + + +
Satan does not exist Dave. He is a made-up figure, a bit
like the bogeyman.
Sorry to be the bearer of sad news once again but it is a
simple fact.
Satana does exist
Damn typos!! "Satan does exist".
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0ot7kv5bdapjl001@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Your Name wrote:
"Good and enjoyable" in Doctor Who stopped a LONG time ago.
:-p
Nah, when it's good it's good... when it's bad, it can be
bad. But I do try to be a half-full type of guy. I always
hope for the best.
Roll on Christmas Day.
What are you drinking?
This is RADW, show some positivity for our favourite TV show or
take your business elsewhere...
The idiot insisted:
In article <vhaafc$2b9g$1@dont-email.me>,
solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
The idiot insisted:
In article <vh9nla$3uk25$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
Yeah, that's right, Gobble-de-gook, I'm sure, when God was
creating The Earth 6,000 years ago, God could have inserted
bones that he had made to appear around 150,000,000 years
old into all that dirt he was making!!
Easy done ..... for GOD!! ;-P
Or Satan.
You’re claiming that Satan created the Earth? Interesting.
Nope! Satan creating Evolution.
So you’re just claiming Satan is responsible for creating all
living species on Earth.
--
solar penguin
Daniel70 wrote:
Blueshirt wrote on 16/11/24 12:14 am:
The True Doctor wrote:No, No, No, Blueshirt, cause if Aggy did that he might not be
I don't not want my licence fee money being spent on
sexually grooming and indoctrinating children and neither
do the majority of licence fee payers.
You need to move from the UK then.
able to watch a program that he obviously LOVES!!
Well, I don't live in the UK, I don't pay for a TV licence -
British or Irish - and I still watch the TV show that I have
loved since I was a child... so it can be done! ;-)
solar penguin wrote:
The idiot insisted:
In article <vhaafc$2b9g$1@dont-email.me>,
solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
You’re claiming that Satan created the Earth? Interesting.
Nope! Satan creating Evolution.
So you’re just claiming Satan is responsible for creating all
living species on Earth.
Religious education class on RADW is getting weirder by the
minute!
Fellow Christians must be embarrassed by the utterances of our
resident evangelist... Mr NotKnow!
The True Doctor wrote:
On 15/11/2024 13:13, Blueshirt wrote:
1) Is there any TV show that you think hasn't been destroyed
by "woke perverts"?
Currently there doesn't seem to be as regards most fantasy and
science fiction. Reacher is OK and people have said Cobra Kai
is unaffected but I don't have Netflix so haven't seen it.
I happily ignored "Rings of Power" S2, as S1 was so poor. I am
told it improved a wee bit, so if I get bored I might give it a
go... I don't have to finish a series, if I don't like something
I stop watching. I can make some excuses for 'fantasy' ... but
don't get me started on things like "Murder is Easy" though!
(One of my favourite Agatha Christie books destroyed by the BBC.)
You do seem to be the expert at spotting that sort of thing.
2) Is there any TV show that you do actually like?
Reacher, Fallout, House of the Dragon.
I'm currently five episodes in to "Paris Has Fallen" on Prime.
Not as good as "Reacher" obviously, but enjoyable enough for some
shooting, killing and bombing on a cold Autumn evening.
"Cross" is next on my list. (My daughter said it's good.)
It must be hard life going around being anti-everything.
Surely there is a glimmer of hope on the horizon with
something you do like to sit down and watch. Let me guess,
Songs of Praise?
Songs of Praise has been unwatchable ever since they got rid
of Aled Jones because he was Welsh. No, I mean because he was
heterosexual.
You don't like Songs of Praise?! <shocked face>
That's your mate's favourite programme... he'll be disappointed.
On 2024-11-16 20:11:53 +0000, Blueshirt said:
The Doctor wrote:
Or Satan.
+ + + + BREAKING NEWS + + + +
Satan does not exist Dave. He is a made-up figure, a bit like
the bogeyman.
Sorry to be the bearer of sad news once again but it is a simple
fact.
Satana does exist ... Americans just voted himin as their next
President. He's orange, wears awful wigs to hide the horns on his head,
tells lies and misinformation without blinking an eye, incites riots,
commits criminal acts, ... :-p
On 2024-11-16 09:35:58 +0000, Daniel70 said:
The Doctor wrote on 16/11/24 3:07 am:Eps ago!!
In article <vh75p1$3bqvj$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 15/11/24 1:03 am:
In article <vh4v8a$2r6ib$4@dont-email.me>, Daniel70
<daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 14/11/24 11:51 pm:
<Snip>
Not having a clue what 'keping up' is .... I'd agree with YOURYou would love Shetland!
Never been there. Didn't even make it to Lock Ness when I was in
Europe/U.K.
You're not keping up.
statement, Gobble-de-gook .... for a change!!
Will wonders never cease??
Hmmm!! My Spell-Checker offered "Peking" as an alternative for "keping" >>>> .... but I've no idea why YOU, Gobble-de-gook, might want to discuss
"Peking"!!
Never heard of the BBC's Shetland I see.
Been watching it for years ........ Just got a Female DCI a couple of
The "Agatha Raisin" actresss was the replacement detective last season. >There's a seconds season with her just started.
On 2024-11-16 20:07:13 +0000, Blueshirt said:
Daniel70 wrote:
Blueshirt wrote on 16/11/24 12:14 am:
The True Doctor wrote:No, No, No, Blueshirt, cause if Aggy did that he might not be
I don't not want my licence fee money being spent on
sexually grooming and indoctrinating children and neither
do the majority of licence fee payers.
You need to move from the UK then.
able to watch a program that he obviously LOVES!!
Well, I don't live in the UK, I don't pay for a TV licence -
British or Irish - and I still watch the TV show that I have
loved since I was a child... so it can be done! ;-)
You pay your "TV licence" to Disney instead. ;-)
(Unless you use the naughty web to download the episodes.)
On 2024-11-16 13:31:35 +0000, solar penguin said:
The idiot insisted:
In article <vh8uu5$3mo09$1@dont-email.me>,
Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:
We already knew the local village idiot fits into the "no braincells"
category.
Said the decevived ones!
The ones who are ten times as evived as usual?
Interesting. How do you evive someone anyway?
Maybe you surgically implant a computer chip and then control them with
this little 'Evive' electronic box: ><https://ai.thestempedia.com/docs/evive/evive-tutorials/getting-started-with-evive/>
That would certainly explain the Village Idiot ... he's being
controlled by someone else (probably is conman church leader).
Your Name wrote:
On 2024-11-16 20:07:13 +0000, Blueshirt said:
Well, I don't live in the UK, I don't pay for a TV licence -
British or Irish - and I still watch the TV show that I have
loved since I was a child... so it can be done! ;-)
You pay your "TV licence" to Disney instead. ;-)
I've no current Disney+ subscription, only Prime Video... plus
our Daughter pays for Netflix and let's us use it. Disney+ goes
on and off as required... usually when there's an offer on.
However, our Sky TV subscription would include a built-in cost
to the BBC for broadcasting their TV/radio channels in
Ireland... we also get the other main British TV channels
(ITV/C4/C5 etc) on our Sky boxes in Ireland, although they are
funded by adverts anyway. Plus there's very little on them these
days either. The streaming services carry most of the decent
stuff these day.
(Unless you use the naughty web to download the episodes.)
I used binaries [NZB's] for the Walking Dead spin-offs last
year, as they took ages to reach Sky. Generally I don't bother
much with those nowadays though.
Your Name wrote:
On 2024-11-16 21:08:57 +0000, Your Name said:
On 2024-11-16 20:11:53 +0000, Blueshirt said:
The Doctor wrote:
Or Satan.
+ + + + BREAKING NEWS + + + +
Satan does not exist Dave. He is a made-up figure, a bit
like the bogeyman.
Sorry to be the bearer of sad news once again but it is a
simple fact.
Satana does exist
Damn typos!! "Satan does exist".
Now you're going to have Dave agree with you as the 'joke' will
go over his head! :-)
On 2024-11-16 21:08:57 +0000, Your Name said:
On 2024-11-16 20:11:53 +0000, Blueshirt said:
The Doctor wrote:
Or Satan.
+ + + + BREAKING NEWS + + + +
Satan does not exist Dave. He is a made-up figure, a bit like
the bogeyman.
Sorry to be the bearer of sad news once again but it is a simple
fact.
Satana does exist
Damn typos!! "Satan does exist". :-\
In article <vhq2c4$16oiv$3@dont-email.me>, Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 22/11/24 11:15 pm:
In article <vhpmaa$14rnm$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel70
<daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
Idlehands wrote on 22/11/24 5:34 pm:
<Snip>
Binky believes his sect is the only "Christians" and will beThe thing that gets me, most, is that Gobble-de-gook is SOOOOOO
the only ones going to Heaven. This "belief" allows him
to heap scorn and hatred on other sects and denominations and
especially Muslims.
He really is a faux Christian wallowing in his ignorance.
Proud of HIS little SECT that he will not even NAME the sect!!
Church of England?? Church of Scotland?? Methodist?? Salvation
Army?? Eastern Orthodoxy?? .... Oh, No, there's the one ....
*Pentecostal/Charismatic* !!
All of which protests the Crimes of Rome!
The thing that gets me, most, is that Gobble-de-gook is SOOOOOO
Proud of HIS little SECT that he will not even NAME the sect!!
Yet you know.
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0otl26fpd8pb1000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Apologies from the Holy See first.
Dave, people can be kind to one another regardless of what
god they worship. Nobody needs a book written hundreds of
years ago to be nice. Yes, I know being nice isn't always
easy, but some of us do try!
If you want to claim you are a practising Christian you
should at least try and follow the message that your "lord"
preached...
Key word: God .
But what god? There seem to be so many... if I was looking to
buy-in to this god thing, how would I know which one is the real
deal?
They all come highly recommended and there may even be
some 'special offers' to tempt me, but how do I know which one
is the genuine article and which one is the fake copy?
And how do you know that you haven't been cheated by being sold
the fake version?
In article <vhq2ln$16sjj$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 22/11/24 11:15 pm:
In article <vhpllj$14oif$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 22/11/24 3:47 am:
In article <xn0otkual6fqbbb001@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
So much for being kind to one another, forgiving one another (as
your god forgave you), loving your enemies and being good... etc.
Apologies from the Holy See first.
Apologies FOR WHAT, Gobble-de-gook?? Kicking YOU, Gobble-de-gook, out, >>>> maybe!!
Crimes against christianity and humanity!
What Crimes were they, Gobble-de-gook, and why hasn't YOUR Police Force,
the RCMP, taken him to court, Gobble-de-gook??
You recall the Crusades?
Also how many visible idols are ther in the RCC?
Daniel70 wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 22/11/24 3:47 am:
The Pope does not represent Christianity.
Correct ..... just the MOST POPULUS strain of Christianity,
Gobble-de-gook.
Covid-19 was also a popular strain!
Plus, popular doesn't necessary equal right. :-)
In article <xn0otmdwr821kbd000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
You revisionists.
The KJV bible is a revison itself.
You arely know that?!
surely <-
Do you correct research,
In article <vhqskl$1biil$1@dont-email.me>,
Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:
On 2024-11-22 15:08:53 +0000, Blueshirt said:
Daniel70 wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 22/11/24 3:47 am:
The Pope does not represent Christianity.
Correct ..... just the MOST POPULUS strain of Christianity,
Gobble-de-gook.
Covid-19 was also a popular strain!
Plus, popular doesn't necessary equal right. :-)
Yep. VHS, Windows OS, and Tesla cars are three other "popular" but
incredibly stupid things. Usually what sells the most is the cheapest
option rather than the best option.
VHS was much better then Beta!
In article <xn0otm9w47win70004@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Idlehands wrote:
Binky believes his sect is the only "Christians" and will be
the only ones going to Heaven. This "belief" allows him to
heap scorn and hatred on other sects and denominations and
especially Muslims.
The Muslims are going to take over the Yadallee Republic one day
and chop the heads off of any surviving Yadallee that doesn't
show respect to Allah...
He really is a faux Christian wallowing in his ignorance.
Lying Idlehnads can never tell the truth.
In article <xn0otmdwr821kbd000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The KJV bible is a revison itself.
You surely arely know that?!
Do you correct research.
Blueshirt wrote on 23/11/24 1:51 am:
And how do you know that you haven't been cheated by being
sold the fake version?
Wait until YOU pass over ..... and then sort the cheat out!!
Daniel70 wrote:
Blueshirt wrote on 23/11/24 1:51 am:
And how do you know that you haven't been cheated by being
sold the fake version?
Wait until YOU pass over ..... and then sort the cheat out!!
It's all a cheat. I will just be a rotting body in damp ground.
I am fairly certain there is nothing beyond that.
Death is just the endless sleep.--
People can believe otherwise if it makes them feel better and
get through this life... but the end result will be exactly the
same.
Blueshirt wrote on 23/11/24 10:46 pm:
It's all a cheat. I will just be a rotting body in damp
ground. I am fairly certain there is nothing beyond that.
Perhaps you might transmogrify (Sp??) into a Rose bush.
Lovely!!
On 2024-11-22 23:06:28 +0000, solar penguin said:
The idiot insisted:
In article <vhq2ln$16sjj$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 22/11/24 11:15 pm:
In article <vhpllj$14oif$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 22/11/24 3:47 am:
Apologies from the Holy See first.
Apologies FOR WHAT, Gobble-de-gook?? Kicking YOU, Gobble-de-gook,
out, maybe!!
Crimes against christianity and humanity!
What Crimes were they, Gobble-de-gook, and why hasn't YOUR Police
Force, the RCMP, taken him to court, Gobble-de-gook??
You recall the Crusades?
The crusades were the RCMP arresting the Pope!?!
I think you just made that up, didn’t you?
The crusades were abasically a bunch of fanatical religious morons
going around killing anybody who didn't believe the same religious
bollocks as they did.
The idiot insisted:
In article <vhr2pk$1ck3v$1@dont-email.me>,
solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
The idiot insisted:
In article <vhq2ln$16sjj$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
What Crimes were they, Gobble-de-gook, and why hasn't YOUR Police
Force, the RCMP, taken him to court, Gobble-de-gook??
You recall the Crusades?
The crusades were the RCMP arresting the Pope!?!
I think you just made that up, didn’t you?
Wrong mixing of events SP!
OK. Good to see you admit to being wrong.
--
solar penguin
Blueshirt wrote on 23/11/24 1:51 am:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0otl26fpd8pb1000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Apologies from the Holy See first.
Dave, people can be kind to one another regardless of what
god they worship. Nobody needs a book written hundreds of
years ago to be nice. Yes, I know being nice isn't always
easy, but some of us do try!
If you want to claim you are a practising Christian you
should at least try and follow the message that your "lord"
preached...
Key word: God .
But what god? There seem to be so many... if I was looking to
buy-in to this god thing, how would I know which one is the real
deal?
Hey, just ask Gobble-de-gook. He'll set you right!! ;-P
They all come highly recommended and there may even be
some 'special offers' to tempt me, but how do I know which one
is the genuine article and which one is the fake copy?
Hey, how about waiting for your misses (or older family members) pass
.... then go visit someone who is good with a "Ouija Board".
And how do you know that you haven't been cheated by being sold
the fake version?
Wait until YOU pass over ..... and then sort the cheat out!!
--
Daniel
The Doctor wrote on 23/11/24 9:57 am:
In article <xn0otm9w47win70004@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Idlehands wrote:
Binky believes his sect is the only "Christians" and will be
the only ones going to Heaven. This "belief" allows him to
heap scorn and hatred on other sects and denominations and
especially Muslims.
The Muslims are going to take over the Yadallee Republic one day
and chop the heads off of any surviving Yadallee that doesn't
show respect to Allah...
He really is a faux Christian wallowing in his ignorance.
Lying Idlehnads can never tell the truth.
So what's YOUR excuse, Gobble-de-gook??
--
Daniel
The Doctor wrote on 23/11/24 9:53 am:
In article <vhq2c4$16oiv$3@dont-email.me>, Daniel70
<daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 22/11/24 11:15 pm:
In article <vhpmaa$14rnm$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel70
<daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
Idlehands wrote on 22/11/24 5:34 pm:
<Snip>
Binky believes his sect is the only "Christians" and will beThe thing that gets me, most, is that Gobble-de-gook is SOOOOOO
the only ones going to Heaven. This "belief" allows him
to heap scorn and hatred on other sects and denominations and
especially Muslims.
He really is a faux Christian wallowing in his ignorance.
Proud of HIS little SECT that he will not even NAME the sect!!
Church of England?? Church of Scotland?? Methodist?? Salvation
Army?? Eastern Orthodoxy?? .... Oh, No, there's the one ....
*Pentecostal/Charismatic* !!
All of which protests the Crimes of Rome!
The thing that gets me, most, is that Gobble-de-gook is SOOOOOO
Proud of HIS little SECT that he will not even NAME the sect!!
Yet you know.
If I knew, Gobble-de-gook, I'd probably be too bust laughing to comment, >Gobble-de-gook!!
--
Daniel
The Doctor wrote on 23/11/24 9:59 am:
In article <xn0otmdwr821kbd000@post.eweka.nl>,Yes, I'm sure Blueshirt does plenty of "correct research",
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
You revisionists.
The KJV bible is a revison itself.
You arely know that?!
surely <-
Do you correct research,
Gobble-de-gook .... I mean what's the purpose of doing research except
to find the CORRECT FACTS, as YOU, Gobble-de-gook, would want.
--
Daniel
Blueshirt wrote on 23/11/24 2:08 am:
Daniel70 wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 22/11/24 3:47 am:
The Pope does not represent Christianity.
Correct ..... just the MOST POPULUS strain of Christianity,
Gobble-de-gook.
Covid-19 was also a popular strain!
"popular"?? With the Medical;/Chemical Companies, maybe!!
Plus, popular doesn't necessary equal right. :-)and MIGHT beats right, too!! ;-P
--
Daniel
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0otmdwr821kbd000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The KJV bible is a revison itself.
You surely arely know that?!
Do you correct research.
No Dave, it's you that needs to do a bit of research if you
think the KJV is the orignal writing of the original authors.
You may not like it but the KJV is widely considered to be an
unreliable translation.
Daniel70 wrote:
Blueshirt wrote on 23/11/24 1:51 am:
And how do you know that you haven't been cheated by being
sold the fake version?
Wait until YOU pass over ..... and then sort the cheat out!!
It's all a cheat. I will just be a rotting body in damp ground.
I am fairly certain there is nothing beyond that.
Death is just the endless sleep.
People can believe otherwise if it makes them feel better and
get through this life... but the end result will be exactly the
same.
Blueshirt wrote on 23/11/24 10:46 pm:
Daniel70 wrote:
Blueshirt wrote on 23/11/24 1:51 am:
And how do you know that you haven't been cheated by being
sold the fake version?
Wait until YOU pass over ..... and then sort the cheat out!!
It's all a cheat. I will just be a rotting body in damp ground.
I am fairly certain there is nothing beyond that.
Perhaps you might transmogrify (Sp??) into a Rose bush. Lovely!!
Death is just the endless sleep.--
People can believe otherwise if it makes them feel better and
get through this life... but the end result will be exactly the
same.
Daniel
Daniel70 wrote:
Blueshirt wrote on 23/11/24 10:46 pm:
It's all a cheat. I will just be a rotting body in damp
ground. I am fairly certain there is nothing beyond that.
Perhaps you might transmogrify (Sp??) into a Rose bush.
Lovely!!
If I can help the environment after I've gone, it's all good.
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0otmdwr821kbd000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The KJV bible is a revison itself.
You surely arely know that?!
Do you correct research.
No Dave, it's you that needs to do a bit of research if you
think the KJV is the orignal writing of the original authors.
You may not like it but the KJV is widely considered to be an
unreliable translation.
On 2024-11-23 4:42 a.m., Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Do you correct research.
No Dave, it's you that needs to do a bit of research if you
think the KJV is the orignal writing of the original authors.
You may not like it but the KJV is widely considered to be an
unreliable translation.
Oh now you've done it, binky is going to cry. Don't even
mention that some historians believe that King James was gay.
In article <xn0otnj6494vhg8003@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Death is just the endless sleep.
People can believe otherwise if it makes them feel better and
gets through this life... but the end result will be exactly
the same.
Wrong worldview.
In article <xn0otnlrr98cp8l000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
Blueshirt wrote on 23/11/24 10:46 pm:
It's all a cheat. I will just be a rotting body in damp
ground. I am fairly certain there is nothing beyond that.
Perhaps you might transmogrify (Sp??) into a Rose bush.
Lovely!!
If I can help the environment after I've gone, it's all good.
Paradox.
The Doctor wrote on 23/11/24 10:00 am:
In article <vhqskl$1biil$1@dont-email.me>,
Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:
On 2024-11-22 15:08:53 +0000, Blueshirt said:
Daniel70 wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 22/11/24 3:47 am:
The Pope does not represent Christianity.
Correct ..... just the MOST POPULUS strain of Christianity,
Gobble-de-gook.
Covid-19 was also a popular strain!
Plus, popular doesn't necessary equal right. :-)
Yep. VHS, Windows OS, and Tesla cars are three other "popular" but
incredibly stupid things. Usually what sells the most is the cheapest
option rather than the best option.
VHS was much better then Beta!
Beta was Better!! Hence the NAME!!
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0otnj6494vhg8003@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Death is just the endless sleep.
People can believe otherwise if it makes them feel better and
gets through this life... but the end result will be exactly
the same.
Wrong worldview.
Right or wrong, it's my worldview... and I am happy to live my
life with it.
YMMV.
On 2024-11-23 11:00:18 +0000, Daniel70 said:
The Doctor wrote on 23/11/24 10:00 am:
In article <vhqskl$1biil$1@dont-email.me>,
Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:
On 2024-11-22 15:08:53 +0000, Blueshirt said:
Daniel70 wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 22/11/24 3:47 am:
The Pope does not represent Christianity.
Correct ..... just the MOST POPULUS strain of Christianity,
Gobble-de-gook.
Covid-19 was also a popular strain!
Plus, popular doesn't necessary equal right. :-)
Yep. VHS, Windows OS, and Tesla cars are three other "popular" but
incredibly stupid things. Usually what sells the most is the cheapest
option rather than the best option.
VHS was much better then Beta!
Beta was Better!! Hence the NAME!!
Betamax was the easily better format for picture quality, but lost out
to the cheaper VHS which also had longer recording times. Beta was (and >probably still is in some places) the choice for professional film and
TV makers.
On 08/11/2024 14:44, Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
The REAL 14th you mean.
No Dave, I don't... and neither does anybody else, as we all
know that Ncuti Gatwa is officially the 15th Doctor. Nothing
you say or do is going to change that.
Ncuti Gatwa is officially nothing since Doctor Who ended in
2017. The last Doctor was Peter Capaldi, the so called 12th
but really the 14th Doctor counting John Hurt, and David
Tennant twice.
In article <vgoehp$3u22u$3@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 08/11/2024 14:44, Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
The REAL 14th you mean.
No Dave, I don't... and neither does anybody else, as we all
know that Ncuti Gatwa is officially the 15th Doctor.
Nothing you say or do is going to change that.
Ncuti Gatwa is officially nothing since Doctor Who ended in
2017. The last Doctor was Peter Capaldi, the so called 12th
but really the 14th Doctor counting John Hurt, and David
Tennant twice.
AGA prove BS to be a liar.
The True Doctor wrote on 10/11/24 6:34 am:
On 09/11/2024 12:01, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 08/11/2024 20:30, Blueshirt wrote:
So what I said wasn't fake news then, was it? People, like you
and Dave, were against a female Doctor from the beginning.
Yes it was. Totally fake news.
How can it be fake when both of you were posting messages here
since the day Jodie was cast as the 13th Doctor complaining about
it? In your case, even saying Chris Chibnall should be sacked!
Most Doctor Who fans thought the same way. Saying otherwise is fake
news.
Sorry! How did "Most Doctor Who fans" know how well the Chibnall/Jodie >combination was going to work BEFORE ANY SCRIPTS HAD BEEN SUBMITTED let
alone anything having been filmed??
Or, maybe you believe in alternative facts? In which case, you
lose the argument for being an idiot.
There are no alternative facts. Almost everyone thought gender
swapping the Doctor was a stupid gimmick that would fail.
"no alternative facts" cause nothing had been written let alone filmed!!
(As an aside, reading your old rants I wonder why you are even
here as you come across more like someone who is an anti-Doctor
Who... even Steven Moffat didn't escape your wrath.)
I supported Moffat until he went woke. There is no place for wokery
in Doctor Who or anywhere. It's fascist Marxist totalitarian thought
control. Doctor Who ended in 2017 when it became everything it stood
against.
Hang on .... you supported "Moffat until he went woke" ..... so this *IS >BEFORE* Chibnall/Jodie had come into existance!!
The Timeless Child monster has everything to do with it. Whittaker
was tolerated until she was sacked. The Timeless Child monster
cannot be tolerated.
If "Whittaker was tolerated until she was sacked" how come, you, AGGY,
hated her 'Doctor Who' character since BEFORE it was ON SCREEN??
What's the saying .... "Doctor Who ceased in 2017!!".
refer to the 13th Doctor!) Some people in fandom wanted the 13th
Doctor to fail from the very beginning, this is not propaganda or
a lie.
They knew she would fail from the very start. Nothing to do with
wanting. It was a stupid gimmick.
So why did "THEY" do it??
Your rants here were quite predictable though and you are
[reasonably] consistent, I will give you that.
My rants were reasonable common sense which the majority agreed or
would agree with.
Except they don't ..... at least not HERE!!
As I said, some people were against Jodie Whittaker's casting
from day one just because she was a woman.
The Doctor is a MALE character. A male character cannot be
played by a woman.
In your opinion.
This is an absolute literary FACT not an opinion.
In how many instances has a Literary character changed sex before?? Did
Ian Fleming's James Bond suddenly become Jane Bond between books??
The Doctor is written acts, thinks, speaks, and behaves in the
manner of a man. That makes him a male character.
One could hardly describe 'The Doctor' as a "Man of Action'. Sure, The
Doctor MAKES THINGS HAPPEN .... but not from MALE STRENGTH!!
entitled to their views but trying to pretend it was because
Jodie didn't play the character well or it was because of the
eventuality that became the Timeless Child is historical
revisionism, aka BULLSHIT.
Your claims are historical revisionism, They facts show that
over 10 million viewers gave Whittaker a chance.
Judging by your posts here, and replies to others, you didn't give
her much of a chance. Any claims otherwise by you are just
confounded lies.
She was given a chance
By WHOM?? YOU had canned her before even a scene was shot!!
and she failed to prove herself. Giving someone a chance doesn't mean
you have to agree with them.
Correct!! So WE don't HAVE to agree with YOU!!
It means they have to prove you wrong. They didn't.
But, according to many, Jodie had failed before WE had even seen a
single scene!!
--
Daniel
The Doctor wrote:
In article <vgoehp$3u22u$3@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 08/11/2024 14:44, Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
The REAL 14th you mean.
No Dave, I don't... and neither does anybody else, as we all
know that Ncuti Gatwa is officially the 15th Doctor.
Nothing you say or do is going to change that.
Ncuti Gatwa is officially nothing since Doctor Who ended in
2017. The last Doctor was Peter Capaldi, the so called 12th
but really the 14th Doctor counting John Hurt, and David
Tennant twice.
AGA prove BS to be a liar.
Please provide a link to a post where Agamemnon proves anything
of the sort... as the above quote about Ncuti Gatwa certainly
isn't it. Ncuti Gatwa is the 15th Doctor, and even Agamemnon
knows that... despite his childish comments about Doctor Who
ending in 2017.
How the fuck you have made it to your fifties without being
sectioned in an Edmonton psych ward beats me... the health care
system in Canada clearly lacks decent funding and quality
Doctors to leave somebody like you out and about in the
community.
In article <vgodgp$3u22u$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 09/11/2024 12:01, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
Your claims are historical revisionism, They facts show
that over 10 million viewers gave Whittaker a chance.
Judging by your posts here, and replies to others, you
didn't give her much of a chance. Any claims otherwise by
you are just confounded lies.
She was given a chance and she failed to prove herself.
Giving someone a chance doesn't mean you have to agree with
them. It means they have to prove you wrong. They didn't.
The long winded BlueShirt (BS) is full of it.
In article <vgq0ol$b22f$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
But, according to many, Jodie had failed before WE had even
seen a single scene!!
And what a blunder!
The Doctor wrote:
In article <vgodgp$3u22u$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 09/11/2024 12:01, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
Your claims are historical revisionism, They facts show
that over 10 million viewers gave Whittaker a chance.
Judging by your posts here, and replies to others, you
didn't give her much of a chance. Any claims otherwise by
you are just confounded lies.
She was given a chance and she failed to prove herself.
Giving someone a chance doesn't mean you have to agree with
them. It means they have to prove you wrong. They didn't.
The long winded BlueShirt (BS) is full of it.
Coming from somebody who was also posting here on RADW against
a female Doctor from day one (i.e. the day of and after Jodie
Whittaker's casting.) I don't know how you can seriously claim
you gave her a chance. The evidence proves otherwise.
So yet more revisionism from Yads, the delusional idiot of
Doctor Who fandom...
The Doctor wrote:
In article <vgq0ol$b22f$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
But, according to many, Jodie had failed before WE had even
seen a single scene!!
And what a blunder!
In retrospect, some people might consider the casting of Jodie
Whittaker a blunder if they were unhappy with her era once that
had seen it... but they didn't know that in July 2017.
I still maintain Jodie was let down by some of the scripts and
having too many companions diluting the Doctor's role within
stories.
But as you are not able to discuss anything about Doctor Who
properly my points are wasted on you.
Dave Doctor Who !
The Doctor wrote on 11/11/24 12:05 am:
<Snip>
Dave Doctor Who !Well, I've always thought YOU, Gobble-de-gook, had tickets on YOURSELF,
but YOU have GOT TO BE JOKING!!
--
Daniel
The True Doctor wrote on 10/11/24 6:34 am:
On 09/11/2024 12:01, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 08/11/2024 20:30, Blueshirt wrote:
So what I said wasn't fake news then, was it? People, like you and
Dave, were against a female Doctor from the beginning.
Yes it was. Totally fake news.
How can it be fake when both of you were posting messages here since
the day Jodie was cast as the 13th Doctor complaining about it? In
your case, even saying Chris Chibnall should be sacked!
Most Doctor Who fans thought the same way. Saying otherwise is fake news.
Sorry! How did "Most Doctor Who fans" know how well the Chibnall/Jodie combination was going to work BEFORE ANY SCRIPTS HAD BEEN SUBMITTED let
alone anything having been filmed??
Or, maybe you believe in alternative facts? In which case, you
lose the argument for being an idiot.
There are no alternative facts. Almost everyone thought gender
swapping the Doctor was a stupid gimmick that would fail.
"no alternative facts" cause nothing had been written let alone filmed!!
(As an aside, reading your old rants I wonder why you are even
here as you come across more like someone who is an anti-Doctor
Who... even Steven Moffat didn't escape your wrath.)
I supported Moffat until he went woke. There is no place for wokery in
Doctor Who or anywhere. It's fascist Marxist totalitarian thought
control. Doctor Who ended in 2017 when it became everything it stood
against.
Hang on .... you supported "Moffat until he went woke" ..... so this *IS BEFORE* Chibnall/Jodie had come into existance!!
The Timeless Child monster has everything to do with it. Whittaker was
tolerated until she was sacked. The Timeless Child monster
cannot be tolerated.
If "Whittaker was tolerated until she was sacked" how come, you, AGGY,
hated her 'Doctor Who' character since BEFORE it was ON SCREEN??
What's the saying .... "Doctor Who ceased in 2017!!".
refer to the 13th Doctor!) Some people in fandom wanted the 13th
Doctor to fail from the very beginning, this is not propaganda or
a lie.
They knew she would fail from the very start. Nothing to do with
wanting. It was a stupid gimmick.
So why did "THEY" do it??
Your rants here were quite predictable though and you are
[reasonably] consistent, I will give you that.
My rants were reasonable common sense which the majority agreed or
would agree with.
Except they don't ..... at least not HERE!!
As I said, some people were against Jodie Whittaker's casting from
day one just because she was a woman.
The Doctor is a MALE character. A male character cannot be
played by a woman.
In your opinion.
This is an absolute literary FACT not an opinion.
In how many instances has a Literary character changed sex before?? Did
Ian Fleming's James Bond suddenly become Jane Bond between books??
The Doctor is written acts, thinks, speaks, and behaves in the
manner of a man. That makes him a male character.
One could hardly describe 'The Doctor' as a "Man of Action'. Sure, The
Doctor MAKES THINGS HAPPEN .... but not from MALE STRENGTH!!
entitled to their views but trying to pretend it was because Jodie
didn't play the character well or it was because of the eventuality
that became the Timeless Child is historical revisionism, aka
BULLSHIT.
Your claims are historical revisionism, They facts show that
over 10 million viewers gave Whittaker a chance.
Judging by your posts here, and replies to others, you didn't give
her much of a chance. Any claims otherwise by you are just confounded
lies.
She was given a chance
By WHOM?? YOU had canned her before even a scene was shot!!
and she failed to prove herself. Giving someone a chance doesn't mean
you have to agree with them.
Correct!! So WE don't HAVE to agree with YOU!!
It means they have to prove you wrong. They didn't.
But, according to many, Jodie had failed before WE had even seen a
single scene!!
In article <xn0ot5b3c98ptbt004@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <vgq0ol$b22f$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
But, according to many, Jodie had failed before WE had even
seen a single scene!!
And what a blunder!
In retrospect, some people might consider the casting of Jodie
Whittaker a blunder if they were unhappy with her era once that
had seen it... but they didn't know that in July 2017.
I still maintain Jodie was let down by some of the scripts and
having too many companions diluting the Doctor's role within
stories.
But as you are not able to discuss anything about Doctor Who
properly my points are wasted on you.
The Whole timeless Child was a waste of an Era!
The Doctor wrote:
In article <vgq0ol$b22f$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
But, according to many, Jodie had failed before WE had even
seen a single scene!!
And what a blunder!
In retrospect, some people might consider the casting of Jodie
Whittaker a blunder if they were unhappy with her era once that
had seen it... but they didn't know that in July 2017.
I still maintain Jodie was let down by some of the scripts and
having too many companions diluting the Doctor's role within
stories.
But as you are not able to discuss anything about Doctor Who
properly my points are wasted on you.
The True Doctor wrote:
On 08/11/2024 14:44, Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
The REAL 14th you mean.
No Dave, I don't... and neither does anybody else, as we all
know that Ncuti Gatwa is officially the 15th Doctor. Nothing
you say or do is going to change that.
Ncuti Gatwa is officially nothing since Doctor Who ended in
2017. The last Doctor was Peter Capaldi, the so called 12th
but really the 14th Doctor counting John Hurt, and David
Tennant twice.
How can people discuss something seriously with you when you
resort to stupidity like that?
Yeah, Doctor Who ended in 2017... <rolls eyes>
See you at Christmas!
On 10/11/2024 12:35, Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <vgq0ol$b22f$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
But, according to many, Jodie had failed before WE had even
seen a single scene!!
And what a blunder!
In retrospect, some people might consider the casting of Jodie
Whittaker a blunder if they were unhappy with her era once that
had seen it... but they didn't know that in July 2017.
They knew she was a woman and that the Doctor was established as a
masculine male character for over 50 years.
If the degenerate woketards wanted a show about a female Time Lords why >didn't they pick an existing one like Romana or create a new one.
I still maintain Jodie was let down by some of the scripts and
having too many companions diluting the Doctor's role within
stories.
Jodie was a s*t actress in everything she's been in just like Gatwa.
Neither of them were suitable to play the role.
But as you are not able to discuss anything about Doctor Who
properly my points are wasted on you.
You points are woke nonsense which fails to accept the fact that the
Doctor is a male character and therefore cannot be believably portrayed
by a woman. The first rule of good writing is suspension of disbelief.
The woke only care about their disgusting messages which are intended to >sexually groom children, not good writing. At least in the United States >President Trump will soon make doing that impossible in public schools.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." -William Shatner
On 10/11/2024 12:12, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 08/11/2024 14:44, Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
The REAL 14th you mean.
No Dave, I don't... and neither does anybody else, as we all
know that Ncuti Gatwa is officially the 15th Doctor. Nothing
you say or do is going to change that.
Ncuti Gatwa is officially nothing since Doctor Who ended in
2017. The last Doctor was Peter Capaldi, the so called 12th
but really the 14th Doctor counting John Hurt, and David
Tennant twice.
How can people discuss something seriously with you when you
resort to stupidity like that?
Yeah, Doctor Who ended in 2017... <rolls eyes>
The Doctor died on the event horizon of a black hole along with his
companion after hallucinating his and her resurrection along with his
first incarnation. Nothing after that is Doctor Who. The TARDIS blows up >after ejecting the fake female Doctor to her death, symbolizing the
absolute end of Doctor Who.
See you at Christmas!
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." -William Shatner
The Doctor wrote:
In article <vgodgp$3u22u$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 09/11/2024 12:01, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
Your claims are historical revisionism, They facts show
that over 10 million viewers gave Whittaker a chance.
Judging by your posts here, and replies to others, you
didn't give her much of a chance. Any claims otherwise by
you are just confounded lies.
She was given a chance and she failed to prove herself.
Giving someone a chance doesn't mean you have to agree with
them. It means they have to prove you wrong. They didn't.
The long winded BlueShirt (BS) is full of it.
Coming from somebody who was also posting here on RADW against
a female Doctor from day one (i.e. the day of and after Jodie
Whittaker's casting.) I don't know how you can seriously claim
you gave her a chance. The evidence proves otherwise.
So yet more revisionism from Yads, the delusional idiot of
Doctor Who fandom...
On 10/11/2024 12:29, Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <vgodgp$3u22u$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 09/11/2024 12:01, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
Your claims are historical revisionism, They facts show
that over 10 million viewers gave Whittaker a chance.
Judging by your posts here, and replies to others, you
didn't give her much of a chance. Any claims otherwise by
you are just confounded lies.
She was given a chance and she failed to prove herself.
Giving someone a chance doesn't mean you have to agree with
them. It means they have to prove you wrong. They didn't.
The long winded BlueShirt (BS) is full of it.
Coming from somebody who was also posting here on RADW against
a female Doctor from day one (i.e. the day of and after Jodie
Whittaker's casting.) I don't know how you can seriously claim
you gave her a chance. The evidence proves otherwise.
Of course he gave her a chance. He watched her first episode just like
over 10 million other people including myself. Giving someone a chance
don't mean you have to support and believe in them from the very start.
In fact it means the exact opposite, not supporting or believing in them
but letting them try to persuade you otherwise.
So yet more revisionism from Yads, the delusional idiot of
Doctor Who fandom...
You are the one engaging in revisionism and delusion, just like all >woketards.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." -William Shatner
The Doctor wrote:
In article <vgoehp$3u22u$3@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 08/11/2024 14:44, Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
The REAL 14th you mean.
No Dave, I don't... and neither does anybody else, as we all
know that Ncuti Gatwa is officially the 15th Doctor.
Nothing you say or do is going to change that.
Ncuti Gatwa is officially nothing since Doctor Who ended in
2017. The last Doctor was Peter Capaldi, the so called 12th
but really the 14th Doctor counting John Hurt, and David
Tennant twice.
AGA prove BS to be a liar.
Please provide a link to a post where Agamemnon proves anything
of the sort... as the above quote about Ncuti Gatwa certainly
isn't it. Ncuti Gatwa is the 15th Doctor, and even Agamemnon
knows that... despite his childish comments about Doctor Who
ending in 2017.
How the fuck you have made it to your fifties without being
sectioned in an Edmonton psych ward beats me... the health care
system in Canada clearly lacks decent funding and quality
Doctors to leave somebody like you out and about in the
community.
In article <vgr21m$h92v$2@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 10/11/2024 10:09, Daniel70 wrote:
The True Doctor wrote on 10/11/24 6:34 am:
On 09/11/2024 12:01, Blueshirt wrote:Sorry! How did "Most Doctor Who fans" know how well the Chibnall/Jodie
The True Doctor wrote:
On 08/11/2024 20:30, Blueshirt wrote:
So what I said wasn't fake news then, was it? People, like you and >>>>>>> Dave, were against a female Doctor from the beginning.
Yes it was. Totally fake news.
How can it be fake when both of you were posting messages here since >>>>> the day Jodie was cast as the 13th Doctor complaining about it? In
your case, even saying Chris Chibnall should be sacked!
Most Doctor Who fans thought the same way. Saying otherwise is fake news. >>>
combination was going to work BEFORE ANY SCRIPTS HAD BEEN SUBMITTED let
alone anything having been filmed??
The mere announcement that the Doctor had been turned into a woman for a
woke gimmick was enough to figure out it was going to fail.
From Day 1 !
Or, maybe you believe in alternative facts? In which case, you
lose the argument for being an idiot.
There are no alternative facts. Almost everyone thought gender
swapping the Doctor was a stupid gimmick that would fail.
"no alternative facts" cause nothing had been written let alone filmed!! >>>
The mere announcement that the Doctor, A MALE CHARACTER, had been turned
into a woman for a woke gimmick was enough to figure out it was going to
fail.
From Day 1 !
(As an aside, reading your old rants I wonder why you are even
here as you come across more like someone who is an anti-Doctor
Who... even Steven Moffat didn't escape your wrath.)
I supported Moffat until he went woke. There is no place for wokery in >>>> Doctor Who or anywhere. It's fascist Marxist totalitarian thought
control. Doctor Who ended in 2017 when it became everything it stood
against.
Hang on .... you supported "Moffat until he went woke" ..... so this *IS >>> BEFORE* Chibnall/Jodie had come into existance!!
No one is claiming that Doctor Who only went woke when Chibnall took
over. Doctor Who went woke the moment Moffat turned the Master into
Missy and insulted the memory of the Brigadier and Nicolas Courtney who
played him.
Hear! Hear!!
The Timeless Child monster has everything to do with it. Whittaker was >>>> tolerated until she was sacked. The Timeless Child monster
cannot be tolerated.
If "Whittaker was tolerated until she was sacked" how come, you, AGGY,
hated her 'Doctor Who' character since BEFORE it was ON SCREEN??
Tolerating her does not imply that I cannot hate her terrible acting and
the terrible writing.
What's the saying .... "Doctor Who ceased in 2017!!".
refer to the 13th Doctor!) Some people in fandom wanted the 13th
Doctor to fail from the very beginning, this is not propaganda or
a lie.
They knew she would fail from the very start. Nothing to do with
wanting. It was a stupid gimmick.
So why did "THEY" do it??
Can you read? I just told you. It was a stupid woke gimmick.
Chibnall and other woke retards like RTD don't care about the audience
or good writing. They only thing they care about is their disgusting,
degenerate woke agenda and using what they produce to sexually groom
children.
Your rants here were quite predictable though and you are
[reasonably] consistent, I will give you that.
My rants were reasonable common sense which the majority agreed or
would agree with.
Except they don't ..... at least not HERE!!
Wrong.
As I said, some people were against Jodie Whittaker's casting from >>>>>>> day one just because she was a woman.
The Doctor is a MALE character. A male character cannot be
played by a woman.
In your opinion.
This is an absolute literary FACT not an opinion.
In how many instances has a Literary character changed sex before?? Did
Ian Fleming's James Bond suddenly become Jane Bond between books??
What the hell is that word salad supposed to mean Kamala?
The Doctor is a MALE character. A male character cannot be played by a
woman. This is an absolute literary FACT not an opinion.
The Doctor is written acts, thinks, speaks, and behaves in the
manner of a man. That makes him a male character.
One could hardly describe 'The Doctor' as a "Man of Action'. Sure, The
Doctor MAKES THINGS HAPPEN .... but not from MALE STRENGTH!!
Wrong again. All you need to do is look at Jon Pertwee for proof by
contradiction.
The Doctor is written acts, thinks, speaks, and behaves in the manner of
a man. That makes him a male character.
entitled to their views but trying to pretend it was because Jodie >>>>>>> didn't play the character well or it was because of the eventuality >>>>>>> that became the Timeless Child is historical revisionism, aka
BULLSHIT.
Your claims are historical revisionism, They facts show that
over 10 million viewers gave Whittaker a chance.
Judging by your posts here, and replies to others, you didn't give
her much of a chance. Any claims otherwise by you are just confounded >>>>> lies.
She was given a chance
By WHOM?? YOU had canned her before even a scene was shot!!
By over 10 million viewers.
and she failed to prove herself. Giving someone a chance doesn't mean
you have to agree with them.
Correct!! So WE don't HAVE to agree with YOU!!
It means they have to prove you wrong. They didn't.
But, according to many, Jodie had failed before WE had even seen a
single scene!!
She failed from the moment she was cast because the Doctor is a MALE
character and therefore cannot be portrayed by a woman. Whittaker was
given a chance to disprove that SCIENTIFIC AND LITERARY FACT and she
couldn't.
How low are the ratings worldwide?
On 10/11/2024 12:35, Blueshirt wrote:
In retrospect, some people might consider the casting of
Jodie Whittaker a blunder if they were unhappy with her era
once that had seen it... but they didn't know that in July
2017.
They knew she was a woman and that the Doctor was established
as a masculine male character for over 50 years.
On 10/11/2024 12:13, Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
AGA prove BS to be a liar.
Please provide a link to a post where Agamemnon proves
anything of the sort... as the above quote about Ncuti Gatwa
certainly isn't it. Ncuti Gatwa is the 15th Doctor, and even
Agamemnon knows that... despite his childish comments about
Doctor Who ending in 2017.
Gatwa is Doctor nothing. The last Doctor was Peter Capaldi.
How the fuck you have made it to your fifties without being
sectioned in an Edmonton psych ward beats me... the health
care system in Canada clearly lacks decent funding and
quality Doctors to leave somebody like you out and about in
the community.
At least he is capable of running the US better than fellow
Canadian Kamala Harris who should be the one locked up in a
psycho ward after her incoherent word salads and condescending
attitude towards the entire electorate.
The True Doctor wrote:
On 10/11/2024 12:35, Blueshirt wrote:
In retrospect, some people might consider the casting of
Jodie Whittaker a blunder if they were unhappy with her era
once that had seen it... but they didn't know that in July
2017.
They knew she was a woman and that the Doctor was established
as a masculine male character for over 50 years.
They also knew that it had already been established in the show
that Time Lords can change gender... following the General and
your favourite incarnation of the Master, Missy. So the Doctor
following suit wasn't a completely revolutionary idea to fans of
the show.
The way you go on about it you'd swear it had never been done
before...
The True Doctor wrote:
On 10/11/2024 10:09, Daniel70 wrote:
But, according to many, Jodie had failed before WE had even
seen a single scene!!
She failed from the moment she was cast because the Doctor is
a MALE character and therefore cannot be portrayed by a woman.
Whittaker was given a chance to disprove that SCIENTIFIC AND
LITERARY FACT and she couldn't.
It's not really Jodie Whittaker's fault that she was cast as the
Doctor though is it? She just took a job. That's not a failure
on her part.
But in all fairness, you did still watch every single one of her
episodes despite saying the show finished in 2017... so in a way
you did give her a chance by never switching off regardless of
how poor you thought she was in the job. So I have now come to
the conclusion that you are a martyr to fandom. Selflessly
watching a show that you claim finished so that future
generations of Doctor Who fans can be spared such an ordeal.
On 10/11/2024 20:46, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 10/11/2024 12:35, Blueshirt wrote:
In retrospect, some people might consider the casting of
Jodie Whittaker a blunder if they were unhappy with her
era once that had seen it... but they didn't know that
in July 2017.
They knew she was a woman and that the Doctor was
established as a masculine male character for over 50
years.
They also knew that it had already been established in the
show that Time Lords can change gender... following the
General and your favourite incarnation of the Master, Missy.
Those were fallacies which are not considered to be canon just
like the moon hatching into a dragon which flies off into the
vacuum of space. Time Lords cannot change gender. If a female
Time Lord was pregnant and she regenerated into a man, how
could the foetus survive?
So the Doctor following suit wasn't a completely
revolutionary idea to fans of the show.
It was a stupid gimmick brought about by degenerate woke bad
writing.
The way you go on about it you'd swear it had never been done
before...
The ratings of the show totally collapsed immediately after
the Master was turned into a woman. The majority of viewers
turned off because of the unbelievable bad writing.
The True Doctor wrote:
On 10/11/2024 20:46, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 10/11/2024 12:35, Blueshirt wrote:
In retrospect, some people might consider the casting of
Jodie Whittaker a blunder if they were unhappy with her
era once that had seen it... but they didn't know that
in July 2017.
They knew she was a woman and that the Doctor was
established as a masculine male character for over 50
years.
They also knew that it had already been established in the
show that Time Lords can change gender... following the
General and your favourite incarnation of the Master, Missy.
Those were fallacies which are not considered to be canon just
like the moon hatching into a dragon which flies off into the
vacuum of space. Time Lords cannot change gender. If a female
Time Lord was pregnant and she regenerated into a man, how
could the foetus survive?
If it is in the show, as broadcast, it is considered to be
'canon', by those that believe in such a thing.
It doesn't mean you can't pretend those events didn't happen of
course, I do it with many things in the show, but still... it
did set-up the principle that Time Lords could change their
gender to get fans used to it. (Which was why Steven Moffat did
it of course.)
So the Doctor following suit wasn't a completely
revolutionary idea to fans of the show.
It was a stupid gimmick brought about by degenerate woke bad
writing.
In your opinion.
The way you go on about it you'd swear it had never been done
before...
The ratings of the show totally collapsed immediately after
the Master was turned into a woman. The majority of viewers
turned off because of the unbelievable bad writing.
I actually thought Missy was quite good... I much preferred her
take on the character than Anthony Ainley's Delgado rip-off
version of the Master.
The True Doctor wrote:
On 10/11/2024 12:13, Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
AGA prove BS to be a liar.
Please provide a link to a post where Agamemnon proves
anything of the sort... as the above quote about Ncuti Gatwa
certainly isn't it. Ncuti Gatwa is the 15th Doctor, and even
Agamemnon knows that... despite his childish comments about
Doctor Who ending in 2017.
Gatwa is Doctor nothing. The last Doctor was Peter Capaldi.
Yes AGA... keep taking those tablets and don't forget to watch
BBC1 on Christmas Day for "Joy to the World" featuring the 15th
Doctor.
How the fuck you have made it to your fifties without being
sectioned in an Edmonton psych ward beats me... the health
care system in Canada clearly lacks decent funding and
quality Doctors to leave somebody like you out and about in
the community.
At least he is capable of running the US better than fellow
Canadian Kamala Harris who should be the one locked up in a
psycho ward after her incoherent word salads and condescending
attitude towards the entire electorate.
Stop being silly... Dave couldn't run a bath, let alone a
country.
The True Doctor wrote:
On 10/11/2024 12:13, Blueshirt wrote:
How the fuck you have made it to your fifties without being
sectioned in an Edmonton psych ward beats me... the health care
system in Canada clearly lacks decent funding and quality
Doctors to leave somebody like you out and about in the
community.
At least he is capable of running the US better than fellow Canadian
Kamala Harris
Canadian? I thought she had to be a natural born U.S. citizen
to run for President.
(I know there was a lot of argument about whether Harris was
Indian or black, but I don’t remember Canadian being one of
the options.)
who should be the one locked up in a psycho ward after her
incoherent word salads and condescending attitude towards the entire
electorate.
You’re the only one allowed to do incoherent word salads and
condescending attitudes! No fake Canadian is going to steal
your gimmick!
The True Doctor wrote:
On 10/11/2024 12:35, Blueshirt wrote:
In retrospect, some people might consider the casting of
Jodie Whittaker a blunder if they were unhappy with her era
once that had seen it... but they didn't know that in July
2017.
They knew she was a woman and that the Doctor was established
as a masculine male character for over 50 years.
They also knew that it had already been established in the show
that Time Lords can change gender... following the General and
your favourite incarnation of the Master, Missy. So the Doctor
following suit wasn't a completely revolutionary idea to fans of
the show.
The way you go on about it you'd swear it had never been done
before...
The True Doctor wrote:
On 10/11/2024 21:06, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
The ratings of the show totally collapsed immediately after
the Master was turned into a woman. The majority of viewers
turned off because of the unbelievable bad writing.
I actually thought Missy was quite good... I much preferred her
take on the character than Anthony Ainley's Delgado rip-off
version of the Master.
Ainley was infinitely superior. The Master was never a nihilistic
psychopath. The character is supposed to be based on 'Blackie' DuQuesne
from E E Smiths Skylark series, not Hannibal Lector.
What’s your source for that? Every interview with Dicks or Letts
I’ve ever seen has said he was based on Professor Moriarty. I don’t
remember them ever mentioning this Blackie bloke.
On 10/11/2024 12:13, Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <vgoehp$3u22u$3@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 08/11/2024 14:44, Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
The REAL 14th you mean.
No Dave, I don't... and neither does anybody else, as we all
know that Ncuti Gatwa is officially the 15th Doctor.
Nothing you say or do is going to change that.
Ncuti Gatwa is officially nothing since Doctor Who ended in
2017. The last Doctor was Peter Capaldi, the so called 12th
but really the 14th Doctor counting John Hurt, and David
Tennant twice.
AGA prove BS to be a liar.
Please provide a link to a post where Agamemnon proves anything
of the sort... as the above quote about Ncuti Gatwa certainly
isn't it. Ncuti Gatwa is the 15th Doctor, and even Agamemnon
knows that... despite his childish comments about Doctor Who
ending in 2017.
Gatwa is Doctor nothing. The last Doctor was Peter Capaldi.
How you have made it to your fifties without being
sectioned in an Edmonton psych ward beats me... the health care
system in Canada clearly lacks decent funding and quality
Doctors to leave somebody like you out and about in the
community.
At least he is capable of running the US better than fellow Canadian
Kamala Harris who should be the one locked up in a psycho ward after her >incoherent word salads and condescending attitude towards the entire >electorate.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." -William Shatner
On 10/11/2024 20:46, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 10/11/2024 12:35, Blueshirt wrote:
In retrospect, some people might consider the casting of
Jodie Whittaker a blunder if they were unhappy with her era
once that had seen it... but they didn't know that in July
2017.
They knew she was a woman and that the Doctor was established
as a masculine male character for over 50 years.
They also knew that it had already been established in the show
that Time Lords can change gender... following the General and
your favourite incarnation of the Master, Missy. So the Doctor
Those were fallacies which are not considered to be canon just like the
moon hatching into a dragon which flies off into the vacuum of space.
Time Lords cannot change gender. If a female Time Lord was pregnant and
she regenerated into a man, how could the foetus survive?
following suit wasn't a completely revolutionary idea to fans of
the show.
It was a stupid gimmick brought about by degenerate woke bad writing.
The way you go on about it you'd swear it had never been done
before...
The ratings of the show totally collapsed immediately after the Master
was turned into a woman. The majority of viewers turned off because of
the unbelievable bad writing.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." -William Shatner
On 10/11/2024 20:46, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 10/11/2024 10:09, Daniel70 wrote:
But, according to many, Jodie had failed before WE had even
seen a single scene!!
She failed from the moment she was cast because the Doctor is
a MALE character and therefore cannot be portrayed by a woman.
Whittaker was given a chance to disprove that SCIENTIFIC AND
LITERARY FACT and she couldn't.
It's not really Jodie Whittaker's fault that she was cast as the
Doctor though is it? She just took a job. That's not a failure
on her part.
She should never have accepted it just like others who were asked before
her said no.
But in all fairness, you did still watch every single one of her
episodes despite saying the show finished in 2017... so in a way
Doctor Who ended in 2017. The Adventures of the Timeless Child Monster
is not Doctor Who.
you did give her a chance by never switching off regardless of
how poor you thought she was in the job. So I have now come to
the conclusion that you are a martyr to fandom. Selflessly
watching a show that you claim finished so that future
generations of Doctor Who fans can be spared such an ordeal.
I watched it so that others would not have to.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." -William Shatner
On 2024-11-10 20:46:32 +0000, Blueshirt said:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 10/11/2024 12:35, Blueshirt wrote:
In retrospect, some people might consider the casting of
Jodie Whittaker a blunder if they were unhappy with her era
once that had seen it... but they didn't know that in July
2017.
They knew she was a woman and that the Doctor was established
as a masculine male character for over 50 years.
They also knew that it had already been established in the show
that Time Lords can change gender... following the General and
your favourite incarnation of the Master, Missy. So the Doctor
following suit wasn't a completely revolutionary idea to fans of
the show.
The way you go on about it you'd swear it had never been done
before...
The gender-swapping / ethnicity-swapping nonsense was only fully >"established" relatively recently and explicity so that the show's
makers could increase the Politically Correct quota tickboxing. Before
that there was at best only vague hints or joking lines of dialogue.
On 10/11/2024 22:08, solar imbecile wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 10/11/2024 12:13, Blueshirt wrote:
How the fuck you have made it to your fifties without being
sectioned in an Edmonton psych ward beats me... the health care
system in Canada clearly lacks decent funding and quality
Doctors to leave somebody like you out and about in the
community.
At least he is capable of running the US better than fellow Canadian
Kamala Harris
Canadian? I thought she had to be a natural born U.S. citizen
to run for President.
She was brought up and educated in Canada and spent more of her life
there than in the US.
(I know there was a lot of argument about whether Harris was
Indian or black, but I don’t remember Canadian being one of
the options.)
Watch Trump's rallies. I can't remember which one but he mentioned it or
his VP did.
who should be the one locked up in a psycho ward after her
incoherent word salads and condescending attitude towards the entire
electorate.
You’re the only one allowed to do incoherent word salads and
condescending attitudes! No fake Canadian is going to steal
your gimmick!
I don't do incoherent word salads. That's the woke far left's territory.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." -William Shatner
On 10/11/2024 22:14, solar imbecile wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 10/11/2024 21:06, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
The ratings of the show totally collapsed immediately after
the Master was turned into a woman. The majority of viewers
turned off because of the unbelievable bad writing.
I actually thought Missy was quite good... I much preferred her
take on the character than Anthony Ainley's Delgado rip-off
version of the Master.
Ainley was infinitely superior. The Master was never a nihilistic
psychopath. The character is supposed to be based on 'Blackie' DuQuesne
from E E Smiths Skylark series, not Hannibal Lector.
What’s your source for that? Every interview with Dicks or Letts
The Skylark of Space, etc. It's blatantly obvious from the whole
frenemies and went to school together take.
I’ve ever seen has said he was based on Professor Moriarty. I don’t
Who was also an influence for DuQuesne, exchange mathematics for
chemistry, but the Master like DuQuesne allies himself with the mafia or >criminals and gives the impression of working for them but he's using
them for his own ends whereas Professor Moriarty is the kingpin of every
criminal organization to begin with. And just DuQuesne the Master and
the Doctor work together whereas this does not happen in the case of
Holmes and Moriarty.
remember them ever mentioning this Blackie bloke.
You probably don't realize that Davros came from Edgar Rice Burroughs
The Master Mind of Mars and Synthetic Men of Mars which is where the
plot of Genesis of the Daleks came from. Davros is Ras Thavas with his
first and last names reversed (Thava Ras) which is something ERB does
with the name of one of the characters in the novel.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." -William Shatner
The True loon tried to be lucid:
On 10/11/2024 22:08, solar imbecile wrote:
The True loon totally lost it:
At least he is capable of running the US better than fellow Canadian
Kamala Harris
Canadian? I thought she had to be a natural born U.S. citizen
to run for President.
She was brought up and educated in Canada and spent more of her life
there than in the US.
So I guess that means you don’t identify as Greek or Cypriot any more?
who should be the one locked up in a psycho ward after her
incoherent word salads and condescending attitude towards the entire
electorate.
You’re the only one allowed to do incoherent word salads and
condescending attitudes! No fake Canadian is going to steal
your gimmick!
I don't do incoherent word salads. That's the woke far left's territory.
Have you read any of your own posts?
In article <vgqcmj$dabf$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 11/11/24 12:05 am:
<Snip>
Dave Doctor Who !Well, I've always thought YOU, Gobble-de-gook, had tickets on YOURSELF,
but YOU have GOT TO BE JOKING!!
You are misquoting! Cut-and-lie Dannyboy in action.
On 10/11/2024 12:29, Blueshirt wrote:
Coming from somebody who was also posting here on RADW against
a female Doctor from day one (i.e. the day of and after Jodie
Whittaker's casting.) I don't know how you can seriously claim
you gave her a chance. The evidence proves otherwise.
Of course he gave her a chance. He watched her first episode just like
over 10 million other people including myself. Giving someone a chance
don't mean you have to support and believe in them from the very start.
In fact it means the exact opposite, not supporting or believing in them
but letting them try to persuade you otherwise.
On 10/11/2024 20:46, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 10/11/2024 12:35, Blueshirt wrote:
In retrospect, some people might consider the casting of
Jodie Whittaker a blunder if they were unhappy with her era
once that had seen it... but they didn't know that in July
2017.
They knew she was a woman and that the Doctor was established
as a masculine male character for over 50 years.
They also knew that it had already been established in the show
that Time Lords can change gender... following the General and
your favourite incarnation of the Master, Missy. So the Doctor
Those were fallacies which are not considered to be canon just like the
moon hatching into a dragon which flies off into the vacuum of space.
Time Lords cannot change gender. If a female Time Lord was pregnant and
she regenerated into a man, how could the foetus survive?
following suit wasn't a completely revolutionary idea to fans of
the show.
It was a stupid gimmick brought about by degenerate woke bad writing.
--The way you go on about it you'd swear it had never been done
before...
The ratings of the show totally collapsed immediately after the Master
was turned into a woman. The majority of viewers turned off because of
the unbelievable bad writing.
On 2024-11-16 20:07:13 +0000, Blueshirt said:
Daniel70 wrote:
Blueshirt wrote on 16/11/24 12:14 am:
The True Doctor wrote:No, No, No, Blueshirt, cause if Aggy did that he might not be
I don't not want my licence fee money being spent on
sexually grooming and indoctrinating children and neither
do the majority of licence fee payers.
You need to move from the UK then.
able to watch a program that he obviously LOVES!!
Well, I don't live in the UK, I don't pay for a TV licence -
British or Irish - and I still watch the TV show that I have
loved since I was a child... so it can be done! ;-)
You pay your "TV licence" to Disney instead. ;-)
(Unless you use the naughty web to download the episodes.)
In article <vh9nrm$3ul4d$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 16/11/24 3:06 am:
In article <vh758r$3bnvo$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
Idlehands wrote on 15/11/24 4:45 pm:
On 2024-11-14 6:47 a.m., Daniel70 wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 14/11/24 11:49 pm:
<Snip>
I have NO idea why YOU, Gobble-de-gook, are asking ME this question!!Idlehands has not logic otherwise he would go to
*PIG'S ARSE!!*
Go to ????
Gobble-de-gook DID include a link .... which I deleted because it didn't >>>> add anything to this discussion.
His embracing of Trump and all he represents is somewhat amusing but >>>>> demonstrates what happens when someone shuts off their brain (?) and >>>>> follow the mob.
Binky should truck on down the to States and walk into a Christian
National Church, it might open his eyes.
So Lying Idlehands , why is the UCC dwindling?
Are you Lying Idlehands in disguise?
On 2024-11-16 09:35:58 +0000, Daniel70 said:
The Doctor wrote on 16/11/24 3:07 am:
In article <vh75p1$3bqvj$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 15/11/24 1:03 am:
In article <vh4v8a$2r6ib$4@dont-email.me>, Daniel70
<daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 14/11/24 11:51 pm:
<Snip>
Not having a clue what 'keping up' is .... I'd agree with YOURYou would love Shetland!
Never been there. Didn't even make it to Lock Ness when I was in
Europe/U.K.
You're not keping up.
statement, Gobble-de-gook .... for a change!!
Will wonders never cease??
Hmmm!! My Spell-Checker offered "Peking" as an alternative for "keping" >>>> .... but I've no idea why YOU, Gobble-de-gook, might want to discuss
"Peking"!!
Never heard of the BBC's Shetland I see.
Been watching it for years ........ Just got a Female DCI a couple of
Eps ago!!
The "Agatha Raisin" actresss was the replacement detective last season. There's a seconds season with her just started.
Your Name wrote on 17/11/24 10:01 am:Santana+%281582%29&utm_term=santana+concert&utm_content=Info+-+Broad
On 2024-11-16 21:08:57 +0000, Your Name said:
On 2024-11-16 20:11:53 +0000, Blueshirt said:
The Doctor wrote:
Or Satan.
+ + + + BREAKING NEWS + + + +
Satan does not exist Dave. He is a made-up figure, a bit like
the bogeyman.
Sorry to be the bearer of sad news once again but it is a simple
fact.
Satana does exist
Damn typos!! "Satan does exist". :-\
Bugger!! I thought you might have mis-spelt 'Santana' ..... cause you
had booked your tickets for the tour next year!! ;-P
https://seatgeek.com/santana-tickets?aid=10923&pid=333135086&gid=1207264113327312&rid=kwd-77653425661254%3Aloc-9&dt=c&adId=77653214895168&mt=bp&n=o&xid=1&msclkid=efa122455dbf1d9a4c6c457c9d35d06b&utm_source=bing&utm_medium=cpc&utm_campaign=Concerts%3A+
--
Daniel
Your Name wrote on 17/11/24 8:11 am:
On 2024-11-16 20:07:13 +0000, Blueshirt said:Doesn't the current BBC/Disney contract provide free distribution of
Daniel70 wrote:
Blueshirt wrote on 16/11/24 12:14 am:
The True Doctor wrote:No, No, No, Blueshirt, cause if Aggy did that he might not be
I don't not want my licence fee money being spent on
sexually grooming and indoctrinating children and neither
do the majority of licence fee payers.
You need to move from the UK then.
able to watch a program that he obviously LOVES!!
Well, I don't live in the UK, I don't pay for a TV licence -
British or Irish - and I still watch the TV show that I have
loved since I was a child... so it can be done! ;-)
You pay your "TV licence" to Disney instead. ;-)
(Unless you use the naughty web to download the episodes.)
"Doctor Who" to Ireland .... or is that only to Northern Ireland??
--
Daniel
Your Name wrote on 17/11/24 8:11 am:
On 2024-11-16 09:35:58 +0000, Daniel70 said:Is it the "Agatha Raisin" actress?? Can't say I've made that connection.
The Doctor wrote on 16/11/24 3:07 am:
In article <vh75p1$3bqvj$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 15/11/24 1:03 am:
In article <vh4v8a$2r6ib$4@dont-email.me>, Daniel70
<daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 14/11/24 11:51 pm:
<Snip>
Not having a clue what 'keping up' is .... I'd agree with YOURYou would love Shetland!
Never been there. Didn't even make it to Lock Ness when I was in >>>>>>> Europe/U.K.
You're not keping up.
statement, Gobble-de-gook .... for a change!!
Will wonders never cease??
Hmmm!! My Spell-Checker offered "Peking" as an alternative for "keping" >>>>> .... but I've no idea why YOU, Gobble-de-gook, might want to discuss >>>>> "Peking"!!
Never heard of the BBC's Shetland I see.
Been watching it for years ........ Just got a Female DCI a couple of
Eps ago!!
The "Agatha Raisin" actresss was the replacement detective last season.
There's a seconds season with her just started.
--
Daniel
In article <vhcfsd$j2d4$2@dont-email.me>, Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 17/11/24 1:01 am:
In article <vh9nrm$3ul4d$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel70
<daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 16/11/24 3:06 am:
In article <vh758r$3bnvo$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel70
<daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
Idlehands wrote on 15/11/24 4:45 pm:
On 2024-11-14 6:47 a.m., Daniel70 wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 14/11/24 11:49 pm:
<Snip>
I have NO idea why YOU, Gobble-de-gook, are asking ME thisIdlehands has not logic otherwise he would go to
*PIG'S ARSE!!*
Go to ????
Gobble-de-gook DID include a link .... which I deleted
because it didn't add anything to this discussion.
His embracing of Trump and all he represents is somewhat
amusing but demonstrates what happens when someone shuts
off their brain (?) and follow the mob.
Binky should truck on down the to States and walk into a
Christian National Church, it might open his eyes.
So Lying Idlehands , why is the UCC dwindling?
question!!
Are you Lying Idlehands in disguise?
Well, YOU, Gobble-de-gook, did apparently ask ME that question,
Gobble-de-gook.
nope!
The Doctor wrote on 17/11/24 11:58 pm:
In article <vhcfsd$j2d4$2@dont-email.me>, Daniel70
<daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 17/11/24 1:01 am:
In article <vh9nrm$3ul4d$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel70
<daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 16/11/24 3:06 am:
In article <vh758r$3bnvo$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel70
<daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
Idlehands wrote on 15/11/24 4:45 pm:
On 2024-11-14 6:47 a.m., Daniel70 wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 14/11/24 11:49 pm:
<Snip>
I have NO idea why YOU, Gobble-de-gook, are asking ME thisIdlehands has not logic otherwise he would go to
*PIG'S ARSE!!*
Go to ????
Gobble-de-gook DID include a link .... which I deleted
because it didn't add anything to this discussion.
His embracing of Trump and all he represents is somewhat
amusing but demonstrates what happens when someone shuts
off their brain (?) and follow the mob.
Binky should truck on down the to States and walk into a
Christian National Church, it might open his eyes.
So Lying Idlehands , why is the UCC dwindling?
question!!
Are you Lying Idlehands in disguise?
Well, YOU, Gobble-de-gook, did apparently ask ME that question,
Gobble-de-gook.
nope!
You responded to one of MY posts, Gobble-de-gook.
--
Daniel
On 12/11/2024 01:00, Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0ot7kv5bdapjl001@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Roll on Christmas Day.
What are you drinking?
This is RADW, show some positivity for our favourite TV show
or take your business elsewhere...
How can people be positive when their favourite show ended in
2017 and there's no sight of it being brought back the way it
was?
Your Name wrote on 17/11/24 8:11 am:
On 2024-11-16 20:07:13 +0000, Blueshirt said:
Well, I don't live in the UK, I don't pay for a TV licence
- British or Irish - and I still watch the TV show that I
have loved since I was a child... so it can be done! ;-)
You pay your "TV licence" to Disney instead. ;-)
(Unless you use the naughty web to download the episodes.)
Doesn't the current BBC/Disney contract provide free
distribution of "Doctor Who" to Ireland .... or is that only
to Northern Ireland??
Bugger!! I thought you might have mis-spelt 'Santana' .....
cause you had booked your tickets for the tour next year!! ;-P
In article <vhch8r$jcmv$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
Doesn't the current BBC/Disney contract provide free
distribution of "Doctor Who" to Ireland .... or is that only
to Northern Ireland??
And BBC1 on the Emerald broadcasts ...
In article <vhahef$3olf$1@dont-email.me>,
solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
The idiot insisted:
In article <vhaafc$2b9g$1@dont-email.me>,
solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
You’re claiming that Satan created the Earth? Interesting.
Nope! Satan creating Evolution.
So you’re just claiming Satan is responsible for creating all
living species on Earth.
Only if you an Evolutionist/Satanist.
In article <xn0ote2p0i9uwsi003@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
solar penguin wrote:
The idiot insisted:
Satan creating Evolution.
So you’re just claiming Satan is responsible for creating
all living species on Earth.
Religious education class on RADW is getting weirder by the
minute!
Fellow Christians must be embarrassed by the utterances of
our resident evangelist... Mr NotKnow!
The notknow lie debunked
Daniel70 wrote:
Your Name wrote on 17/11/24 8:11 am:
On 2024-11-16 20:07:13 +0000, Blueshirt said:Doesn't the current BBC/Disney contract provide free
Well, I don't live in the UK, I don't pay for a TV licence
- British or Irish - and I still watch the TV show that I
have loved since I was a child... so it can be done! ;-)
You pay your "TV licence" to Disney instead. ;-)
(Unless you use the naughty web to download the episodes.)
distribution of "Doctor Who" to Ireland .... or is that only
to Northern Ireland??
Not exactly, but close. BBC1 is available in all of Ireland and
has been since forever... so anyone could watch Doctor Who on
BBC1 as broadcast at whatever time it is shown. The thing you
are on about is the streaming deal which allowed [delayed]
streaming of Doctor Who S1/14 on RTE's "RTE Player" because the
BBC's iPlayer service is only [legally] available to people
within the UK.
So despite the much publicised BBC/Disney "exclusive" deal for
Doctor Who I can turn on the RTE Player this afternoon and
re-watch any episode of the RTD 2.0 era.
Incidentally, on the RTE Player Ncuti Gatwa's first season is
listed as Doctor Who "Season 24" and the four 2023 special
episodes are listed as "Season 23"...
Daniel70 wrote:
Your Name wrote on 17/11/24 8:11 am:
On 2024-11-16 20:07:13 +0000, Blueshirt said:Doesn't the current BBC/Disney contract provide free
Well, I don't live in the UK, I don't pay for a TV licence
- British or Irish - and I still watch the TV show that I
have loved since I was a child... so it can be done! ;-)
You pay your "TV licence" to Disney instead. ;-)
(Unless you use the naughty web to download the episodes.)
distribution of "Doctor Who" to Ireland .... or is that only
to Northern Ireland??
Not exactly, but close. BBC1 is available in all of Ireland and
has been since forever... so anyone could watch Doctor Who on
BBC1 as broadcast at whatever time it is shown. The thing you
are on about is the streaming deal which allowed [delayed]
streaming of Doctor Who S1/14 on RTE's "RTE Player" because the
BBC's iPlayer service is only [legally] available to people
within the UK.
So despite the much publicised BBC/Disney "exclusive" deal for
Doctor Who I can turn on the RTE Player this afternoon and
re-watch any episode of the RTD 2.0 era.
Incidentally, on the RTE Player Ncuti Gatwa's first season is
listed as Doctor Who "Season 24" and the four 2023 special
episodes are listed as "Season 23"...
Daniel70 wrote:Santana+%281582%29&utm_term=santana+concert&utm_content=Info+-+Broad
Bugger!! I thought you might have mis-spelt 'Santana' .....
cause you had booked your tickets for the tour next year!! ;-P
https://seatgeek.com/santana-tickets?aid=10923&pid=333135086&gid=1207264113327312&rid=kwd-77653425661254%3Aloc-9&dt=c&adId=77653214895168&mt=bp&n=o&xid=1&msclkid=efa122455dbf1d9a4c6c457c9d35d06b&utm_source=bing&utm_medium=cpc&utm_campaign=Concerts%3A+
Is Santana still alive? Wow! I thought he was long gone.
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0ote2p0i9uwsi003@post.eweka.nl>,https://www.credly.com/badges/d8b36cbf-aee0-49b9-ac7b-d35d89a4b5b3/embedded
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
solar penguin wrote:
The idiot insisted:
Satan creating Evolution.
So you’re just claiming Satan is responsible for creating
all living species on Earth.
Religious education class on RADW is getting weirder by the
minute!
Fellow Christians must be embarrassed by the utterances of
our resident evangelist... Mr NotKnow!
The notknow lie debunked
Dave, chill out... it's just a joke, a witty play on words. No
need to take it to heart.
However, if you were claiming that Satan is responsible for
creating evolution... I would politely suggest that you need to
do some further reading on the subject!
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
Your Name wrote on 17/11/24 8:11 am:
On 2024-11-16 20:07:13 +0000, Blueshirt said:Doesn't the current BBC/Disney contract provide free
Well, I don't live in the UK, I don't pay for a TV licence
- British or Irish - and I still watch the TV show that I
have loved since I was a child... so it can be done! ;-)
You pay your "TV licence" to Disney instead. ;-)
(Unless you use the naughty web to download the episodes.)
distribution of "Doctor Who" to Ireland .... or is that only
to Northern Ireland??
Not exactly, but close. BBC1 is available in all of Ireland and
has been since forever... so anyone could watch Doctor Who on
BBC1 as broadcast at whatever time it is shown. The thing you
are on about is the streaming deal which allowed [delayed]
streaming of Doctor Who S1/14 on RTE's "RTE Player" because the
BBC's iPlayer service is only [legally] available to people
within the UK.
So despite the much publicised BBC/Disney "exclusive" deal for
Doctor Who I can turn on the RTE Player this afternoon and
re-watch any episode of the RTD 2.0 era.
Incidentally, on the RTE Player Ncuti Gatwa's first season is
listed as Doctor Who "Season 24" and the four 2023 special
episodes are listed as "Season 23"...
So really, by year. That would make the first six episodes of the classic >show “Season 63”.
--
“Most of the Universe is knackered, babes.” - The Doctor
In article <vhd7lc$nvc5$1@dont-email.me>,
The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Incidentally, on the RTE Player Ncuti Gatwa's first season
is listed as Doctor Who "Season 24" and the four 2023
special episodes are listed as "Season 23"...
So really, by year. That would make the first six episodes
of the classic show “Season 63”.
Argh!
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
So despite the much publicised BBC/Disney "exclusive" deal
for Doctor Who I can turn on the RTE Player this afternoon
and re-watch any episode of the RTD 2.0 era.
Incidentally, on the RTE Player Ncuti Gatwa's first season is
listed as Doctor Who "Season 24" and the four 2023 special
episodes are listed as "Season 23"...
So really, by year. That would make the first six episodes of
the classic show “Season 63”.
Your Name wrote on 17/11/24 8:11 am:
On 2024-11-16 09:35:58 +0000, Daniel70 said:
The Doctor wrote on 16/11/24 3:07 am:
In article <vh75p1$3bqvj$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70á <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 15/11/24 1:03 am:
In article <vh4v8a$2r6ib$4@dont-email.me>, Daniel70
<daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 14/11/24 11:51 pm:
<Snip>
You would love Shetland!
Never been there. Didn't even make it to Lock Ness when I was in >>>>>>> Europe/U.K.
You're not keping up.
Not having a clue what 'keping up' is .... I'd agree with YOUR
statement, Gobble-de-gook .... for a change!!
Will wonders never cease??
Hmmm!! My Spell-Checker offered "Peking" as an alternative for "keping" >>>>> .... but I've no idea why YOU, Gobble-de-gook, might want to discuss >>>>> "Peking"!!
Never heard of the BBC's Shetland I see.
Been watching it for years ........ Just got a Female DCI a couple of Eps ago!!
The "Agatha Raisin" actresss was the replacement detective last season.
There's a seconds season with her just started.
Is it the "Agatha Raisin" actress?? Can't say I've made that connection.
The True Doctor wrote:
On 12/11/2024 01:00, Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0ot7kv5bdapjl001@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Roll on Christmas Day.
What are you drinking?
This is RADW, show some positivity for our favourite TV show
or take your business elsewhere...
How can people be positive when their favourite show ended in
2017 and there's no sight of it being brought back the way it
was?
Cheer up, the glass isn't always half-empty... Doctor Who will
be returning to a PC monitor near you in just 38 days time!
I bet you are so excited...
On 2024-11-17 10:46:32 +0000, Daniel70 said:
Is it the "Agatha Raisin" actress?? Can't say I've made that
connection.
Yep. Ashley Jensen is the new "Shetland" detective and played
the title role in "Agatha Raisin", among many other shows.
Americans may know her better from the US show "Ugly Betty".
Her 'big break' is often said to have been in Ricky Gervais'
supposed-comedy "Extras", but she had mainly smaller roles in
many shows before that.
There have been rumours about a new fifth season of "Agatha
Raisin", but nothing concrete yet.
On 17/11/2024 15:11, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 12/11/2024 01:00, Blueshirt wrote:
This is RADW, show some positivity for our favourite TV
show or take your business elsewhere...
How can people be positive when their favourite show ended
in 2017 and there's no sight of it being brought back the
way it was?
Cheer up, the glass isn't always half-empty... Doctor Who
will be returning to a PC monitor near you in just 38 days
time!
No it won't. It ended in 2017 and there's no revival in sight.
The True Doctor wrote:
On 17/11/2024 15:11, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 12/11/2024 01:00, Blueshirt wrote:
This is RADW, show some positivity for our favourite TV
show or take your business elsewhere...
How can people be positive when their favourite show ended
in 2017 and there's no sight of it being brought back the
way it was?
Cheer up, the glass isn't always half-empty... Doctor Who
will be returning to a PC monitor near you in just 38 days
time!
No it won't. It ended in 2017 and there's no revival in sight.
You are a right ol' misery guts at times aren't you?
Lighten up man. Whatever happens, at least you've got something
to come here and moan about on Christmas Day haven't you? So
even if you're not looking forward to "Joy to the World" you're
surely looking forward to complaining about it here?!
Look at it as a win/win.
Happy Christmas!
On 17/11/2024 21:16, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 17/11/2024 15:11, Blueshirt wrote:
Cheer up, the glass isn't always half-empty... Doctor Who
will be returning to a PC monitor near you in just 38
days time!
No it won't. It ended in 2017 and there's no revival in
sight.
You are a right ol' misery guts at times aren't you?
Lighten up man. Whatever happens, at least you've got
something to come here and moan about on Christmas Day
haven't you? So even if you're not looking forward to "Joy
to the World" you're surely looking forward to complaining
about it here?!
Look at it as a win/win.
Joy to the Woke more like. It's not being made for the
intelligent majority.
Happy Christmas!
I will be happy when Doctor Whoke is cancelled.
The True Doctor wrote:
On 17/11/2024 21:16, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 17/11/2024 15:11, Blueshirt wrote:
Cheer up, the glass isn't always half-empty... Doctor Who
will be returning to a PC monitor near you in just 38
days time!
No it won't. It ended in 2017 and there's no revival in
sight.
You are a right ol' misery guts at times aren't you?
Lighten up man. Whatever happens, at least you've got
something to come here and moan about on Christmas Day
haven't you? So even if you're not looking forward to "Joy
to the World" you're surely looking forward to complaining
about it here?!
Look at it as a win/win.
Joy to the Woke more like. It's not being made for the
intelligent majority.
You've seen the episode already?
Happy Christmas!
I will be happy when Doctor Whoke is cancelled.
That's exactly what the "woke" crowd do... cancel things because
they don't like them!
So you have become what you constantly complain about.
How ironic.
The Last Doctor wrote:
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
So despite the much publicised BBC/Disney "exclusive" deal
for Doctor Who I can turn on the RTE Player this afternoon
and re-watch any episode of the RTD 2.0 era.
Incidentally, on the RTE Player Ncuti Gatwa's first season is
listed as Doctor Who "Season 24" and the four 2023 special
episodes are listed as "Season 23"...
So really, by year. That would make the first six episodes of
the classic show “Season 63”.
Actually, RTE have corrected S14 since I last checked, it now
does say Season 14. (I assume somebody e-mailed them.)
However, RTE have left the four 2023 Doctor Who specials as
"Season 23".
https://www.rte.ie/player/series/doctor-who-specials/10003664-00-0000?epguid=AQ10003665-23-0001
<shrugs>
The Doctor wrote:
In article <vhd7lc$nvc5$1@dont-email.me>,
The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Incidentally, on the RTE Player Ncuti Gatwa's first season
is listed as Doctor Who "Season 24" and the four 2023
special episodes are listed as "Season 23"...
So really, by year. That would make the first six episodes
of the classic show “Season 63”.
Argh!
Well, it would be easily understood once you knew what you were
on about. So, there is a kind of logic to it.
:-)
On 2024-11-17 10:46:32 +0000, Daniel70 said:
Your Name wrote on 17/11/24 8:11 am:of Eps ago!!
On 2024-11-16 09:35:58 +0000, Daniel70 said:
The Doctor wrote on 16/11/24 3:07 am:
In article <vh75p1$3bqvj$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70á <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 15/11/24 1:03 am:
In article <vh4v8a$2r6ib$4@dont-email.me>, Daniel70
<daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 14/11/24 11:51 pm:
<Snip>
You would love Shetland!
Never been there. Didn't even make it to Lock Ness when I was in >>>>>>>> Europe/U.K.
You're not keping up.
Not having a clue what 'keping up' is .... I'd agree with YOUR
statement, Gobble-de-gook .... for a change!!
Will wonders never cease??
Hmmm!! My Spell-Checker offered "Peking" as an alternative for "keping" >>>>>> .... but I've no idea why YOU, Gobble-de-gook, might want to discuss >>>>>> "Peking"!!
Never heard of the BBC's Shetland I see.
Been watching it for years ........ Just got a Female DCI a couple
The "Agatha Raisin" actresss was the replacement detective last season.
There's a seconds season with her just started.
Is it the "Agatha Raisin" actress?? Can't say I've made that connection.
Yep. Ashley Jensen is the new "Shetland" detective and played the title
role in "Agatha Raisin", among many other shows. Americans may know her >better from the US show "Ugly Betty". Her 'big break' is often said to
have been in Ricky Gervais' supposed-comedy "Extras", but she had
mainly smaller roles in many shows before that. ><https://www.imdb.com/name/nm0421332/>
There have been rumours about a new fifth season of "Agatha Raisin",
but nothing concrete yet.
On 17/11/2024 21:16, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 17/11/2024 15:11, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 12/11/2024 01:00, Blueshirt wrote:
This is RADW, show some positivity for our favourite TV
show or take your business elsewhere...
How can people be positive when their favourite show ended
in 2017 and there's no sight of it being brought back the
way it was?
Cheer up, the glass isn't always half-empty... Doctor Who
will be returning to a PC monitor near you in just 38 days
time!
No it won't. It ended in 2017 and there's no revival in sight.
You are a right ol' misery guts at times aren't you?
Lighten up man. Whatever happens, at least you've got something
to come here and moan about on Christmas Day haven't you? So
even if you're not looking forward to "Joy to the World" you're
Joy to the Woke more like. It's not being made for the intelligent majority.
surely looking forward to complaining about it here?!
Look at it as a win/win.
Happy Christmas!
I will be happy when Doctor Whoke is cancelled.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." -William Shatner
The True Doctor wrote:
On 17/11/2024 21:16, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 17/11/2024 15:11, Blueshirt wrote:
Cheer up, the glass isn't always half-empty... Doctor Who
will be returning to a PC monitor near you in just 38
days time!
No it won't. It ended in 2017 and there's no revival in
sight.
You are a right ol' misery guts at times aren't you?
Lighten up man. Whatever happens, at least you've got
something to come here and moan about on Christmas Day
haven't you? So even if you're not looking forward to "Joy
to the World" you're surely looking forward to complaining
about it here?!
Look at it as a win/win.
Joy to the Woke more like. It's not being made for the
intelligent majority.
You've seen the episode already?
Happy Christmas!
I will be happy when Doctor Whoke is cancelled.
That's exactly what the "woke" crowd do... cancel things because
they don't like them!
So you have become what you constantly complain about.
How ironic.
The Doctor wrote on 17/11/24 1:01 am:
In article <vh9nrm$3ul4d$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 16/11/24 3:06 am:
In article <vh758r$3bnvo$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
Idlehands wrote on 15/11/24 4:45 pm:
On 2024-11-14 6:47 a.m., Daniel70 wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 14/11/24 11:49 pm:
<Snip>
I have NO idea why YOU, Gobble-de-gook, are asking ME this question!!Idlehands has not logic otherwise he would go to
*PIG'S ARSE!!*
Go to ????
Gobble-de-gook DID include a link .... which I deleted because it
didn't
add anything to this discussion.
His embracing of Trump and all he represents is somewhat amusing but >>>>>> demonstrates what happens when someone shuts off their brain (?) and >>>>>> follow the mob.
Binky should truck on down the to States and walk into a Christian >>>>>> National Church, it might open his eyes.
So Lying Idlehands , why is the UCC dwindling?
Are you Lying Idlehands in disguise?
Well, YOU, Gobble-de-gook, did apparently ask ME that question, Gobble- de-gook.
On 2024-11-17 3:17 a.m., Daniel70 wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 17/11/24 1:01 am:
In article <vh9nrm$3ul4d$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel70
<daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 16/11/24 3:06 am:
In article <vh758r$3bnvo$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel70
<daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
Idlehands wrote on 15/11/24 4:45 pm:
On 2024-11-14 6:47 a.m., Daniel70 wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 14/11/24 11:49 pm:
<Snip>
I have NO idea why YOU, Gobble-de-gook, are asking ME thisIdlehands has not logic otherwise he would go to
*PIG'S ARSE!!*
Go to ????
Gobble-de-gook DID include a link .... which I deleted
because it didn't add anything to this discussion.
His embracing of Trump and all he represents is somewhat
amusing but demonstrates what happens when someone shuts
off their brain (?) and follow the mob.
Binky should truck on down the to States and walk into a
Christian National Church, it might open his eyes.
So Lying Idlehands , why is the UCC dwindling?
question!!
Are you Lying Idlehands in disguise?
Well, YOU, Gobble-de-gook, did apparently ask ME that question,
Gobble- de-gook.
Poor binky, "runs" and ISP but has no clue how to thread messages or
follow a thread.
I answered his questions (through your post) but he can't see it,
what a sad excuse for a Sys Admin.
In article <xn0otnitp94dj3z000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
In fact, when you think about it, I'm not really a lot different
to you... I don't know how many different gods there are around
the world, but if there was 2000 different gods that people
believed in, you wouldn't believe in 1999 of them. I just don't
believe in one more. <shrugs> Hardly a big deal.
Beware the girp Satan has on you, atheist!
In article <vhsb27$1lsrp$2@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 23/11/24 9:53 am:
In article <vhq2c4$16oiv$3@dont-email.me>, Daniel70
<daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 22/11/24 11:15 pm:
In article <vhpmaa$14rnm$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel70
<daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
Idlehands wrote on 22/11/24 5:34 pm:
<Snip>
Binky believes his sect is the only "Christians" and will beThe thing that gets me, most, is that Gobble-de-gook is SOOOOOO
the only ones going to Heaven. This "belief" allows him
to heap scorn and hatred on other sects and denominations and
especially Muslims.
He really is a faux Christian wallowing in his ignorance.
Proud of HIS little SECT that he will not even NAME the sect!!
Church of England?? Church of Scotland?? Methodist?? Salvation
Army?? Eastern Orthodoxy?? .... Oh, No, there's the one ....
*Pentecostal/Charismatic* !!
All of which protests the Crimes of Rome!
The thing that gets me, most, is that Gobble-de-gook is SOOOOOO
Proud of HIS little SECT that he will not even NAME the sect!!
Yet you know.
If I knew, Gobble-de-gook, I'd probably be too bust laughing to comment,
Gobble-de-gook!!
Yet you know.
On 2024-11-23 11:00:18 +0000, Daniel70 said:
The Doctor wrote on 23/11/24 10:00 am:
In article <vhqskl$1biil$1@dont-email.me>,
Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:
On 2024-11-22 15:08:53 +0000, Blueshirt said:
Daniel70 wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 22/11/24 3:47 am:
The Pope does not represent Christianity.
Correct ..... just the MOST POPULUS strain of Christianity,
Gobble-de-gook.
Covid-19 was also a popular strain!
Plus, popular doesn't necessary equal right. :-)
Yep. VHS, Windows OS, and Tesla cars are three other "popular" but
incredibly stupid things. Usually what sells the most is the cheapest
option rather than the best option.
VHS was much better then Beta!
Beta was Better!! Hence the NAME!!
Betamax was the easily better format for picture quality, but lost out
to the cheaper VHS which also had longer recording times. Beta was (and probably still is in some places) the choice for professional film and
TV makers.
In article <vhsbbr$1lurc$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 23/11/24 9:54 am:
In article <vhq2ln$16sjj$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 22/11/24 11:15 pm:
In article <vhpllj$14oif$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 22/11/24 3:47 am:
In article <xn0otkual6fqbbb001@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
<Snip>
So much for being kind to one another, forgiving one another (as >>>>>>>> your god forgave you), loving your enemies and being good... etc. >>>>>>>Apologies from the Holy See first.
Apologies FOR WHAT, Gobble-de-gook?? Kicking YOU, Gobble-de-gook, out, >>>>>> maybe!!
Crimes against christianity and humanity!
What Crimes were they, Gobble-de-gook, and why hasn't YOUR Police Force, >>>> the RCMP, taken him to court, Gobble-de-gook??
You recall the Crusades?
Also how many visible idols are ther in the RCC?
None, Gobble-de-gook!!
So no Ilols of Jesus Christ and Mother Mary in the RCC?
The Doctor wrote on 24/11/24 12:51 am:
In article <vhsbbr$1lurc$1@dont-email.me>,Well I've got ZERO idea what "Ilols" are, Gobble-de-gook, so I'll say
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 23/11/24 9:54 am:
In article <vhq2ln$16sjj$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 22/11/24 11:15 pm:
In article <vhpllj$14oif$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 22/11/24 3:47 am:
In article <xn0otkual6fqbbb001@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
<Snip>
So much for being kind to one another, forgiving one another (as >>>>>>>>> your god forgave you), loving your enemies and being good... etc. >>>>>>>>Apologies from the Holy See first.
Apologies FOR WHAT, Gobble-de-gook?? Kicking YOU, Gobble-de-gook, out, >>>>>>> maybe!!
Crimes against christianity and humanity!
What Crimes were they, Gobble-de-gook, and why hasn't YOUR Police Force, >>>>> the RCMP, taken him to court, Gobble-de-gook??
You recall the Crusades?
Also how many visible idols are ther in the RCC?
None, Gobble-de-gook!!
So no Ilols of Jesus Christ and Mother Mary in the RCC?
*NO* !!
--
Daniel
The Doctor wrote on 24/11/24 12:39 am:
In article <vhsb27$1lsrp$2@dont-email.me>,How STUPID are YOU, Gobble-de-gook? If I knew what little SECT of a
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 23/11/24 9:53 am:
In article <vhq2c4$16oiv$3@dont-email.me>, Daniel70
<daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 22/11/24 11:15 pm:
In article <vhpmaa$14rnm$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel70
<daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
Idlehands wrote on 22/11/24 5:34 pm:
<Snip>
Binky believes his sect is the only "Christians" and will beThe thing that gets me, most, is that Gobble-de-gook is SOOOOOO
the only ones going to Heaven. This "belief" allows him
to heap scorn and hatred on other sects and denominations and
especially Muslims.
He really is a faux Christian wallowing in his ignorance.
Proud of HIS little SECT that he will not even NAME the sect!!
Church of England?? Church of Scotland?? Methodist?? Salvation
Army?? Eastern Orthodoxy?? .... Oh, No, there's the one ....
*Pentecostal/Charismatic* !!
All of which protests the Crimes of Rome!
The thing that gets me, most, is that Gobble-de-gook is SOOOOOO
Proud of HIS little SECT that he will not even NAME the sect!!
Yet you know.
If I knew, Gobble-de-gook, I'd probably be too bust laughing to comment, >>> Gobble-de-gook!!
Yet you know.
Church YOU, Gobble-de-gook, belonged to, why would I be asking now, >Gobble-de-gook?
--
Daniel
Your Name wrote on 24/11/24 9:25 am:
On 2024-11-23 11:00:18 +0000, Daniel70 said:
The Doctor wrote on 23/11/24 10:00 am:
In article <vhqskl$1biil$1@dont-email.me>,
Your Nameá <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:
On 2024-11-22 15:08:53 +0000, Blueshirt said:
Daniel70 wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 22/11/24 3:47 am:
The Pope does not represent Christianity.
Correct ..... just the MOST POPULUS strain of Christianity,
Gobble-de-gook.
Covid-19 was also a popular strain!
Plus, popular doesn't necessary equal right. :-)
Yep. VHS, Windows OS, and Tesla cars are three other "popular" but
incredibly stupid things. Usually what sells the most is the cheapest >>>>> option rather than the best option.
VHS was much better then Beta!
Beta was Better!! Hence the NAME!!
Betamax was the easily better format for picture quality, but lost out
to the cheaper VHS which also had longer recording times. Beta was (and
probably still is in some places) the choice for professional film and
TV makers.
Sort of suggests something that most (if not all) the 'on location'
T.V. News Cameras of the mid-80's onwards were BetaCams!!
And Idols of Jesus Christ and Mother MAry?
On 2024-11-24 11:22:53 +0000, Daniel70 said:
Your Name wrote on 24/11/24 9:25 am:
On 2024-11-23 11:00:18 +0000, Daniel70 said:
The Doctor wrote on 23/11/24 10:00 am:
In article <vhqskl$1biil$1@dont-email.me>,
Your Nameá <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:
On 2024-11-22 15:08:53 +0000, Blueshirt said:
Daniel70 wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 22/11/24 3:47 am:
The Pope does not represent Christianity.
Correct ..... just the MOST POPULUS strain of Christianity,
Gobble-de-gook.
Covid-19 was also a popular strain!
Plus, popular doesn't necessary equal right. :-)
Yep. VHS, Windows OS, and Tesla cars are three other "popular" but >>>>>> incredibly stupid things. Usually what sells the most is the cheapest >>>>>> option rather than the best option.
VHS was much better then Beta!
Beta was Better!! Hence the NAME!!
Betamax was the easily better format for picture quality, but lost out
to the cheaper VHS which also had longer recording times. Beta was (and
probably still is in some places) the choice for professional film and
TV makers.
Sort of suggests something that most (if not all) the 'on location'
T.V. News Cameras of the mid-80's onwards were BetaCams!!
Betamax and Betacam are similar in some ways, but different in others. >Betacam was better than Betamax. They did use the same type of video >cassette, but the video formats themselves were not interchagable.
The Doctor wrote:
And Idols of Jesus Christ and Mother MAry?
Most Christian churches have a depiction of a cross with Jewsus
on it somewhere within them as a symbol of the
crucification ... is that not idolatry?
The crucifix kind of contradicts the second commandment too...
well, for those that worship it anyway. Obviously, I don't!
The Doctor wrote:
And Idols of Jesus Christ and Mother MAry?
Most Christian churches have a depiction of a cross with Jewsus
on it somewhere within them as a symbol of the crucification ... is
that not idolatry?
The crucifix kind of contradicts the second commandment too... well,
for those that worship it anyway. Obviously, I don't!
On 2024-11-24 23:01:51 +0000, Blueshirt said:
The Doctor wrote:
And Idols of Jesus Christ and Mother MAry?
Most Christian churches have a depiction of a cross with Jewsus
Jewsus ... that must be the Jewish version. ;-)
on it somewhere within them as a symbol of the crucification ... is
that not idolatry?
The crucifix kind of contradicts the second commandment too... well,
for those that worship it anyway. Obviously, I don't!
But the over-ruling First Commandment is: "Don't use your own brain -
blindly follow whatever garbage the priest says." :-p
I am hoping for a Donald J. Trump win!
That way Tim Bruening has a total mental breakdown!
In article <vgr6ov$h92v$10@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 10/11/2024 20:46, Blueshirt wrote:
The way you go on about it you'd swear it had never been done
before...
The ratings of the show totally collapsed immediately after the Master
was turned into a woman. The majority of viewers turned off because of
the unbelievable bad writing.
I really Hope Tim Sanford Bruening is locked up.
The True loon twisted and turned:
On 10/11/2024 22:14, solar imbecile wrote:
The True loon let loose with:
Ainley was infinitely superior. The Master was never a nihilistic
psychopath. The character is supposed to be based on 'Blackie'
DuQuesne from E E Smiths Skylark series, not Hannibal Lector.
What’s your source for that?
The Skylark of Space, etc. It's blatantly obvious from the whole
frenemies and went to school together take.
Every interview with Dicks or Letts I’ve ever seen has said he
was based on Professor Moriarty.
Who was also an influence for DuQuesne, exchange mathematics
for chemistry, but the Master like DuQuesne allies himself with
the mafia or criminals and gives the impression of working for them
but he's using them for his own ends whereas Professor Moriarty
is the kingpin of every criminal organization to begin with. And
just DuQuesne the Master and the Doctor work together whereas
this does not happen in the case of Holmes and Moriarty.
In other words, when you say the Master is “supposed to be
based on” your Blackie bloke, you really mean there just happen
to be some stories where he just happens to remind you of
him.
Riiight…
Do you do this with every Blackie character in old pulp novels? For
example, do you also think it’s “obvious” that the Doctor is >“supposed to be” based on Boston Blackie from the books of
Jack Boyle?
(As for the the differences from Moriarty, that’s probably just
a side effect of the different genres. It’s possible to think that >Victorian London had an organised criminal underworld. It’s
a lot less likely that there’s an organised network of aliens all
taking it in turns to invade Earth!)
I don’t remember them ever mentioning this Blackie bloke.
Well, can you cite any examples of Dicks or Letts mentioning him?
You probably don't realize that Davros came from Edgar Rice
Burroughs The Master Mind of Mars and Synthetic Men of Mars which
is where the plot of Genesis of the Daleks came from. Davros is
Ras Thavas with his first and last names reversed (Thava Ras) which
is something ERB does with the name of one of the characters in the novel. >>
And now you shift the goalposts to a totally different Doctor Who
villain who just happens to remind you of a totally different character
from a totally different pulp novel for totally different reasons.
And this one isn’t even called Blackie!
--
solar penguin
The True loon tried to be lucid:
On 10/11/2024 22:08, solar imbecile wrote:
The True loon totally lost it:
At least he is capable of running the US better than fellow Canadian
Kamala Harris
Canadian? I thought she had to be a natural born U.S. citizen
to run for President.
She was brought up and educated in Canada and spent more of her life
there than in the US.
So I guess that means you don’t identify as Greek or Cypriot any more?
who should be the one locked up in a psycho ward after her
incoherent word salads and condescending attitude towards the entire
electorate.
You’re the only one allowed to do incoherent word salads and
condescending attitudes! No fake Canadian is going to steal
your gimmick!
I don't do incoherent word salads. That's the woke far left's territory.
Have you read any of your own posts?
--
solar penguin
solar penguin wrote on 11/11/24 7:00 pm:
The True loon tried to be lucid:
On 10/11/2024 22:08, solar imbecile wrote:
The True loon totally lost it:
At least he is capable of running the US better than fellow Canadian >>>>> Kamala Harris
Canadian? I thought she had to be a natural born U.S. citizen
to run for President.
First I've heard/read of it!!
I'm guessing ..... *NO* ..... else 'we' wouldn't see such word salads!!She was brought up and educated in Canada and spent more of her life
there than in the US.
So I guess that means you don’t identify as Greek or Cypriot any more?
who should be the one locked up in a psycho ward after her
incoherent word salads and condescending attitude towards the entire >>>>> electorate.
You’re the only one allowed to do incoherent word salads and
condescending attitudes! No fake Canadian is going to steal
your gimmick!
I don't do incoherent word salads. That's the woke far left's territory.
Have you read any of your own posts?
--
Daniel
The Doctor wrote on 11/11/24 12:35 am:
In article <vgqcmj$dabf$1@dont-email.me>,No, Gobble-de-gook, have a look at YOUR actual post, Gobble-de-gook, as
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 11/11/24 12:05 am:
<Snip>
Dave Doctor Who !Well, I've always thought YOU, Gobble-de-gook, had tickets on YOURSELF,
but YOU have GOT TO BE JOKING!!
You are misquoting! Cut-and-lie Dannyboy in action.
it appears on YOUR server, Gobble-de-gook!!
Sure, I've deleted that portion of YOUR post THAT I WAS NOT RESPONDING
TO as UseNet rules require/request, Gobble-de-gook, but the relevant
part of YOUR post, the portion to which I was responding, is exactly as
I posted above, Gobble-de-gook!!
If YOU, Gobble-de-gook, don't believe me, have a look at YOUR own
'stored' SENT messages to see who is misquoting who, Gobble-de-gook!!
--
Daniel
The True Doctor wrote on 11/11/24 7:08 am:
On 10/11/2024 12:29, Blueshirt wrote:
<Snip>
Coming from somebody who was also posting here on RADW against
a female Doctor from day one (i.e. the day of and after Jodie
Whittaker's casting.) I don't know how you can seriously claim
you gave her a chance. The evidence proves otherwise.
Of course he gave her a chance. He watched her first episode just like
over 10 million other people including myself. Giving someone a chance
don't mean you have to support and believe in them from the very start.
In fact it means the exact opposite, not supporting or believing in them
but letting them try to persuade you otherwise.
When you watched the first 'DoctorDavid' episode, were you thinking
"This is going to be the best thing since sliced bread" ..... or were
you thinking "This could be all right, I'll give it a go and see what >happens??"
Same Situation .... this time for 'JodieDoctor'??
--
Daniel
The True Doctor wrote on 11/11/24 7:58 am:
On 10/11/2024 20:46, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 10/11/2024 12:35, Blueshirt wrote:
In retrospect, some people might consider the casting of
Jodie Whittaker a blunder if they were unhappy with her era
once that had seen it... but they didn't know that in July
2017.
They knew she was a woman and that the Doctor was established
as a masculine male character for over 50 years.
They also knew that it had already been established in the show
that Time Lords can change gender... following the General and
your favourite incarnation of the Master, Missy. So the Doctor
Those were fallacies which are not considered to be canon just like the
moon hatching into a dragon which flies off into the vacuum of space.
Time Lords cannot change gender. If a female Time Lord was pregnant and
she regenerated into a man, how could the foetus survive?
If the Mass of a 6ft+ Doctor can be redistributed into a 5ft 8inch'ish >Doctor, why couldn't a Doctors 40inch waist be redistributed into a
Doctors 32inch waist??
If frizzy/curly hair can become straight hair (or vice-versa)??
Can a 6inch Penis regenerate into an 8inch Penis?? (Do Gualifreyan Males
even have Penis'??
If a Female Time Lord (?? Time Lady) were pregnant when her time to >regenerate came about, I'm guessing the foetal matter would just be >re-absorbed and re-distributed.
following suit wasn't a completely revolutionary idea to fans of
the show.
It was a stupid gimmick brought about by degenerate woke bad writing.
Would it have been more acceptable if, in 2005, Doctor Who had come back
as a Female .... rather than Chris Eccleston??
--The way you go on about it you'd swear it had never been done
before...
The ratings of the show totally collapsed immediately after the Master
was turned into a woman. The majority of viewers turned off because of
the unbelievable bad writing.
Daniel
The Doctor wrote on 11/11/24 12:02 pm:
In article <vgr6ov$h92v$10@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 10/11/2024 20:46, Blueshirt wrote:
<Snip>
The way you go on about it you'd swear it had never been done
before...
The ratings of the show totally collapsed immediately after the Master
was turned into a woman. The majority of viewers turned off because of
the unbelievable bad writing.
I really Hope Tim Sanford Bruening is locked up.
Why, Gobble-de-gook?? Is it a crime to *not* post here, thus limiting
YOUR opportunities to Reply, Gobble-de-gook??
--
Daniel
In article <vgr9he$h92v$14@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 10/11/2024 20:57, Blueshirt wrote:
Stop being silly... Dave couldn't run a bath, let alone a
country.
And still he'd be doing a better job than Kamala Harris.
Harris can't even run two sentences together that make
sense. All that comes out of her is nonsensical word salad.
Why do you think she lost the election?
BS should run for Fianna Foil.
solar penguin wrote on 11/11/24 7:00 pm:
The True loon tried to be lucid:
On 10/11/2024 22:08, solar imbecile wrote:
The True loon totally lost it:
who should be the one locked up in a psycho ward after
her incoherent word salads and condescending attitude
towards the entire electorate.
You’re the only one allowed to do incoherent word salads
and condescending attitudes! No fake Canadian is going
to steal your gimmick!
I don't do incoherent word salads. That's the woke far
left's territory.
Have you read any of your own posts?
I'm guessing ..... NO ..... else 'we' wouldn't see such word
salads!!
The Doctor wrote on 11/11/24 12:35 am:
You are misquoting! Cut-and-lie Dannyboy in action.
No, Gobble-de-gook, have a look at YOUR actual post,
Gobble-de-gook, as it appears on YOUR server, Gobble-de-gook!!
Sure, I've deleted that portion of YOUR post THAT I WAS NOT
RESPONDING TO as UseNet rules require/request, Gobble-de-gook,
but the relevant part of YOUR post, the portion to which I was
responding, is exactly as I posted above, Gobble-de-gook!!
If YOU, Gobble-de-gook, don't believe me, have a look at YOUR
own 'stored' SENT messages to see who is misquoting who,
Gobble-de-gook!!
In article <vgsjps$u21i$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The True Doctor wrote on 11/11/24 7:08 am:
Of course he gave her a chance. He watched her first
episode just like over 10 million other people including
myself. Giving someone a chance don't mean you have to
support and believe in them from the very start. In fact
it means the exact opposite, not supporting or believing in
them but letting them try to persuade you otherwise.
When you watched the first 'DoctorDavid' episode, were you
thinking "This is going to be the best thing since sliced
bread" ..... or were you thinking "This could be all right,
I'll give it a go and see what happens??"
Yes!
Same Situation .... this time for 'JodieDoctor'??
No!
On 2024-11-10 20:46:32 +0000, Blueshirt said:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 10/11/2024 12:35, Blueshirt wrote:
In retrospect, some people might consider the casting of
Jodie Whittaker a blunder if they were unhappy with her
era once that had seen it... but they didn't know that
in July 2017.
They knew she was a woman and that the Doctor was
established as a masculine male character for over 50
years.
They also knew that it had already been established in the
show that Time Lords can change gender... following the
General and your favourite incarnation of the Master, Missy.
So the Doctor following suit wasn't a completely
revolutionary idea to fans of the show.
The way you go on about it you'd swear it had never been done
before...
The gender-swapping / ethnicity-swapping nonsense was only
fully "established" relatively recently and explicity so that
the show's makers could increase the Politically Correct quota
tickboxing. Before that there was at best only vague hints or
joking lines of dialogue.
The True Doctor wrote:
On 10/11/2024 22:14, solar imbecile wrote:
The True loon let loose with:
Ainley was infinitely superior. The Master was never a nihilistic
psychopath. The character is supposed to be based on 'Blackie'
DuQuesne from E E Smiths Skylark series, not Hannibal Lector.
What’s your source for that?
The Skylark of Space, etc. It's blatantly obvious from the whole
frenemies and went to school together take.
Every interview with Dicks or Letts I’ve ever seen has said he
was based on Professor Moriarty.
Who was also an influence for DuQuesne, exchange mathematics
for chemistry, but the Master like DuQuesne allies himself with
the mafia or criminals and gives the impression of working for them
but he's using them for his own ends whereas Professor Moriarty
is the kingpin of every criminal organization to begin with. And
just DuQuesne the Master and the Doctor work together whereas
this does not happen in the case of Holmes and Moriarty.
In other words, when you say the Master is “supposed to be
based on” your Blackie bloke, you really mean there just happen
to be some stories where he just happens to remind you of
him.
Riiight…
Do you do this with every Blackie character in old pulp novels? For
example, do you also think it’s “obvious” that the Doctor is “supposed to be” based on Boston Blackie from the books of
Jack Boyle?
(As for the the differences from Moriarty, that’s probably just
a side effect of the different genres. It’s possible to think that Victorian London had an organised criminal underworld. It’s
a lot less likely that there’s an organised network of aliens all
taking it in turns to invade Earth!)
I don’t remember them ever mentioning this Blackie bloke.
Well, can you cite any examples of Dicks or Letts mentioning him?
You probably don't realize that Davros came from Edgar Rice
Burroughs The Master Mind of Mars and Synthetic Men of Mars which
is where the plot of Genesis of the Daleks came from. Davros is
Ras Thavas with his first and last names reversed (Thava Ras) which
is something ERB does with the name of one of the characters in the novel. >>
And now you shift the goalposts to a totally different Doctor Who
villain who just happens to remind you of a totally different character
from a totally different pulp novel for totally different reasons.
And this one isn’t even called Blackie!
The True Doctor wrote on 11/11/24 7:58 am:
On 10/11/2024 20:46, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 10/11/2024 12:35, Blueshirt wrote:
In retrospect, some people might consider the casting of
Jodie Whittaker a blunder if they were unhappy with her era
once that had seen it... but they didn't know that in July
2017.
They knew she was a woman and that the Doctor was established
as a masculine male character for over 50 years.
They also knew that it had already been established in the show
that Time Lords can change gender... following the General and
your favourite incarnation of the Master, Missy. So the Doctor
Those were fallacies which are not considered to be canon just like
the moon hatching into a dragon which flies off into the vacuum of
space. Time Lords cannot change gender. If a female Time Lord was
pregnant and she regenerated into a man, how could the foetus survive?
If the Mass of a 6ft+ Doctor can be redistributed into a 5ft 8inch'ish Doctor, why couldn't a Doctors 40inch waist be redistributed into a
Doctors 32inch waist??
If frizzy/curly hair can become straight hair (or vice-versa)??
Can a 6inch Penis regenerate into an 8inch Penis?? (Do Gualifreyan Males
even have Penis'??
If a Female Time Lord (?? Time Lady) were pregnant when her time to regenerate came about, I'm guessing the foetal matter would just be re- absorbed and re-distributed.
following suit wasn't a completely revolutionary idea to fans of
the show.
It was a stupid gimmick brought about by degenerate woke bad writing.
Would it have been more acceptable if, in 2005, Doctor Who had come back
as a Female .... rather than Chris Eccleston??
The way you go on about it you'd swear it had never been done
before...
The ratings of the show totally collapsed immediately after the Master
was turned into a woman. The majority of viewers turned off because of
the unbelievable bad writing.
Your Name wrote:
On 2024-11-10 20:46:32 +0000, Blueshirt said:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 10/11/2024 12:35, Blueshirt wrote:
In retrospect, some people might consider the casting of
Jodie Whittaker a blunder if they were unhappy with her
era once that had seen it... but they didn't know that
in July 2017.
They knew she was a woman and that the Doctor was
established as a masculine male character for over 50
years.
They also knew that it had already been established in the
show that Time Lords can change gender... following the
General and your favourite incarnation of the Master, Missy.
So the Doctor following suit wasn't a completely
revolutionary idea to fans of the show.
The way you go on about it you'd swear it had never been done
before...
The gender-swapping / ethnicity-swapping nonsense was only
fully "established" relatively recently and explicity so that
the show's makers could increase the Politically Correct quota
tickboxing. Before that there was at best only vague hints or
joking lines of dialogue.
True, but we do live in a world where, rightly or wrongly,
people can, and do, change their gender. So the BBC might have
decided they wanted their TV shows to represent the world that
people live in today.
For a fictional TV show about an alien time-traveller than can
already change their body, face, hair (etc.) I didn't have a
problem with Missy as a female Master. I actually thought
Michelle Gomez did a good job, even though her character could
quite easily have been the Rani instead, as we did already have
a female Time Lord villain established in the show. But a
gender-swapping alien from a body-swapping one isn't a big-leap
for me in a sci-fi type of show. I am a Doctor Who fan, I just
want the stories to be good and enjoyable.
The True Doctor wrote:
On 10/11/2024 22:08, solar imbecile wrote:
The True loon totally lost it:
At least he is capable of running the US better than fellow Canadian
Kamala Harris
Canadian? I thought she had to be a natural born U.S. citizen
to run for President.
She was brought up and educated in Canada and spent more of her life
there than in the US.
So I guess that means you don’t identify as Greek or Cypriot any more?
who should be the one locked up in a psycho ward after her
incoherent word salads and condescending attitude towards the entire
electorate.
You’re the only one allowed to do incoherent word salads and
condescending attitudes! No fake Canadian is going to steal
your gimmick!
I don't do incoherent word salads. That's the woke far left's territory.
Have you read any of your own posts?
The True Doctor wrote on 11/11/24 7:08 am:
On 10/11/2024 12:29, Blueshirt wrote:
<Snip>
Coming from somebody who was also posting here on RADW against
a female Doctor from day one (i.e. the day of and after Jodie
Whittaker's casting.) I don't know how you can seriously claim
you gave her a chance. The evidence proves otherwise.
Of course he gave her a chance. He watched her first episode just like
over 10 million other people including myself. Giving someone a chance
don't mean you have to support and believe in them from the very
start. In fact it means the exact opposite, not supporting or
believing in them but letting them try to persuade you otherwise.
When you watched the first 'DoctorDavid' episode, were you thinking
"This is going to be the best thing since sliced bread" ..... or were
you thinking "This could be all right, I'll give it a go and see what happens??"
Same Situation .... this time for 'JodieDoctor'??
Your Name wrote:
On 2024-11-10 20:46:32 +0000, Blueshirt said:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 10/11/2024 12:35, Blueshirt wrote:
In retrospect, some people might consider the casting of
Jodie Whittaker a blunder if they were unhappy with her
era once that had seen it... but they didn't know that
in July 2017.
They knew she was a woman and that the Doctor was
established as a masculine male character for over 50
years.
They also knew that it had already been established in the
show that Time Lords can change gender... following the
General and your favourite incarnation of the Master, Missy.
So the Doctor following suit wasn't a completely
revolutionary idea to fans of the show.
The way you go on about it you'd swear it had never been done
before...
The gender-swapping / ethnicity-swapping nonsense was only
fully "established" relatively recently and explicity so that
the show's makers could increase the Politically Correct quota
tickboxing. Before that there was at best only vague hints or
joking lines of dialogue.
True, but we do live in a world where, rightly or wrongly, people can,
and do, change their gender. So the BBC might have decided they wanted
their TV shows to represent the world that people live in today.
For a fictional TV show about an alien time-traveller than can already
change their body, face, hair (etc.)
I didn't have a problem with Missy as a female Master. I actually thought Michelle Gomez did a good job, even though her character could quite
easily have been the Rani instead, as we did already have a female Time
Lord villain established in the show. But a gender-swapping alien from
a body-swapping one isn't a big-leap for me in a sci-fi type of show. I
am a Doctor Who fan, I just want the stories to be good and enjoyable.
The Doctor wrote:
In article <vgsjps$u21i$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The True Doctor wrote on 11/11/24 7:08 am:
Of course he gave her a chance. He watched her first
episode just like over 10 million other people including
myself. Giving someone a chance don't mean you have to
support and believe in them from the very start. In fact
it means the exact opposite, not supporting or believing in
them but letting them try to persuade you otherwise.
When you watched the first 'DoctorDavid' episode, were you
thinking "This is going to be the best thing since sliced
bread" ..... or were you thinking "This could be all right,
I'll give it a go and see what happens??"
Yes!
Same Situation .... this time for 'JodieDoctor'??
No!
Of course not, as Jodie Whittaker was cast as a female Doctor,
which was a big no-no to some fans. It also disproves the
argument put forth above by your 'buddy' that you gave Jodie a
chance. Some people did, some people didn't. Your posts here
made it quite clear at the time which position you took though.
You were never going to accept a female Doctor full stop.
And all you've done since then is to bleat about her era being
retconned twenty times a week here like a broken record...
The Doctor wrote:
In article <vgr9he$h92v$14@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 10/11/2024 20:57, Blueshirt wrote:
Stop being silly... Dave couldn't run a bath, let alone a
country.
And still he'd be doing a better job than Kamala Harris.
Harris can't even run two sentences together that make
sense. All that comes out of her is nonsensical word salad.
Why do you think she lost the election?
BS should run for Fianna Foil.
Clearly you know about as much about Irish politics as you do
about everything else... i.e. not a lot!
Every time you sit at your keyboard you prove to us all just how
little you comprehend about the world outside of your
basement... the HQ of NotKnow, Inc.
On 2024-11-11 16:17:54 +0000, Blueshirt said:
Your Name wrote:
The gender-swapping / ethnicity-swapping nonsense was only
fully "established" relatively recently and explicity so
that the show's makers could increase the Politically
Correct quota tickboxing. Before that there was at best
only vague hints or joking lines of dialogue.
True, but we do live in a world where, rightly or wrongly,
people can, and do, change their gender. So the BBC might
have decided they wanted their TV shows to represent the
world that people live in today.
The entertainment studios have been forced by Politically
Corerct idiots to have quotas of women, non-white people, and
disabled people in their shows. It's simply a lot cheaper and
easier for them to simply swap an existing white male
character than to actually be creative and make NEW shows and
characters. :-(
For a fictional TV show about an alien time-traveller than
can already change their body, face, hair (etc.)
Then why hasn't there ever been a version of the Doctor as a
blue blob creature, or flying squirrel character, or a stick
insect, ... or even as a Dalek??
There is no sensible in-show explanation because it's based
purely on the current Political Correctness idiocy going on
everywhere. :-(
I am a Doctor Who fan, I just want the stories to be
good and enjoyable.
"Good and enjoyable" in Doctor Who stopped a LONG time ago.
:-p
Daniel70 wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 11/11/24 12:35 am:
No, Gobble-de-gook, have a look at YOUR actual post,
You are misquoting! Cut-and-lie Dannyboy in action.
Gobble-de-gook, as it appears on YOUR server, Gobble-de-gook!!
Sure, I've deleted that portion of YOUR post THAT I WAS NOT
RESPONDING TO as UseNet rules require/request, Gobble-de-gook,
but the relevant part of YOUR post, the portion to which I was
responding, is exactly as I posted above, Gobble-de-gook!!
If YOU, Gobble-de-gook, don't believe me, have a look at YOUR
own 'stored' SENT messages to see who is misquoting who,
Gobble-de-gook!!
Don't bother, after thirty (plus) years on Usenet Dave still
hasn't grasped that people trim quotes and only reply to the bit
left... in his world you need the whole hundred lines of text
for context as his goldfish-like brain can't comprehend the gist
of the conversation... especially as he doesn't use a threaded
display.
So low IQ and no threaded display = incoherence from the CEO of
the aptly named NotKnow.
Your Name wrote:
On 2024-11-10 20:46:32 +0000, Blueshirt said:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 10/11/2024 12:35, Blueshirt wrote:
In retrospect, some people might consider the casting of
Jodie Whittaker a blunder if they were unhappy with her
era once that had seen it... but they didn't know that
in July 2017.
They knew she was a woman and that the Doctor was
established as a masculine male character for over 50
years.
They also knew that it had already been established in the
show that Time Lords can change gender... following the
General and your favourite incarnation of the Master, Missy.
So the Doctor following suit wasn't a completely
revolutionary idea to fans of the show.
The way you go on about it you'd swear it had never been done
before...
The gender-swapping / ethnicity-swapping nonsense was only
fully "established" relatively recently and explicity so that
the show's makers could increase the Politically Correct quota
tickboxing. Before that there was at best only vague hints or
joking lines of dialogue.
True, but we do live in a world where, rightly or wrongly,
people can, and do, change their gender. So the BBC might have
decided they wanted their TV shows to represent the world that
people live in today.
For a fictional TV show about an alien time-traveller than can
already change their body, face, hair (etc.) I didn't have a
problem with Missy as a female Master. I actually thought
Michelle Gomez did a good job, even though her character could
quite easily have been the Rani instead, as we did already have
a female Time Lord villain established in the show. But a
gender-swapping alien from a body-swapping one isn't a big-leap
for me in a sci-fi type of show. I am a Doctor Who fan, I just
want the stories to be good and enjoyable.
On 11/11/2024 10:14, Daniel70 wrote:
The True Doctor wrote on 11/11/24 7:58 am:
On 10/11/2024 20:46, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 10/11/2024 12:35, Blueshirt wrote:
In retrospect, some people might consider the casting of
Jodie Whittaker a blunder if they were unhappy with her era
once that had seen it... but they didn't know that in July
2017.
They knew she was a woman and that the Doctor was established
as a masculine male character for over 50 years.
They also knew that it had already been established in the show
that Time Lords can change gender... following the General and
your favourite incarnation of the Master, Missy. So the Doctor
Those were fallacies which are not considered to be canon just like
the moon hatching into a dragon which flies off into the vacuum of
space. Time Lords cannot change gender. If a female Time Lord was
pregnant and she regenerated into a man, how could the foetus survive?
If the Mass of a 6ft+ Doctor can be redistributed into a 5ft 8inch'ish
Doctor, why couldn't a Doctors 40inch waist be redistributed into a
Doctors 32inch waist??
We're not talking about the mass of the moon being redistributed. Around
95% of the mass of the moon flew away in the shape of space dragon, so
where did the missing mass come from to reform the moon so that it had >exactly the same mass as before? And how did it end up being exactly the
same shape with no cracks showing and exactly the same craters and
artefacts on the moon such as the UNIT moonbase that Liz Shaw was based
on? What happened to Liz Shaw and the abandoned moon buggies that can
still be spotted, along with laser reflecting mirrors?
If frizzy/curly hair can become straight hair (or vice-versa)??
Can a 6inch Penis regenerate into an 8inch Penis?? (Do Gualifreyan Males
even have Penis'??
If a Female Time Lord (?? Time Lady) were pregnant when her time to
regenerate came about, I'm guessing the foetal matter would just be re-
absorbed and re-distributed.
That is the same as killing an unborn child.
following suit wasn't a completely revolutionary idea to fans of
the show.
It was a stupid gimmick brought about by degenerate woke bad writing.
Would it have been more acceptable if, in 2005, Doctor Who had come back
as a Female .... rather than Chris Eccleston??
No. After 9 incarnations as a man the Doctor was firmly establish as a
white British male literary character.
The way you go on about it you'd swear it had never been done
before...
The ratings of the show totally collapsed immediately after the Master
was turned into a woman. The majority of viewers turned off because of
the unbelievable bad writing.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." -William Shatner
On 11/11/2024 07:30, solar imbecile wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 10/11/2024 22:14, solar imbecile wrote:
The True loon let loose with:
Ainley was infinitely superior. The Master was never a nihilistic
psychopath. The character is supposed to be based on 'Blackie'
DuQuesne from E E Smiths Skylark series, not Hannibal Lector.
What’s your source for that?
The Skylark of Space, etc. It's blatantly obvious from the whole
frenemies and went to school together take.
Every interview with Dicks or Letts I’ve ever seen has said he
was based on Professor Moriarty.
Who was also an influence for DuQuesne, exchange mathematics
for chemistry, but the Master like DuQuesne allies himself with
the mafia or criminals and gives the impression of working for them
but he's using them for his own ends whereas Professor Moriarty
is the kingpin of every criminal organization to begin with. And
just DuQuesne the Master and the Doctor work together whereas
this does not happen in the case of Holmes and Moriarty.
In other words, when you say the Master is “supposed to be
based on” your Blackie bloke, you really mean there just happen
to be some stories where he just happens to remind you of
him.
No. What I said is that the Master IS based on 'Blackie' DuQuesne. The >Skylark series could not have gone unread by Dicks and Letts. It stands
as one of the primary foundational pillars of science fiction along with
the Lensman Series, the Barsoom Series, the Foundation Series,
Armageddon 2419/The Airlords of Han (Anthony 'Buck' Rogers), I Robot,
1984, Fahrenheit 451, and the science fiction works of H G Wells. I'm in
two minds whether to include Dune as it's a derivative of the Foundation
and Barsoom series, and Flash Gordon was created as a derivative of Buck >Rogers.
You obviously know very little about science fiction.
Riiight…
Do you do this with every Blackie character in old pulp novels? For
example, do you also think it’s “obvious” that the Doctor is
“supposed to be” based on Boston Blackie from the books of
Jack Boyle?
(As for the the differences from Moriarty, that’s probably just
a side effect of the different genres. It’s possible to think that
Victorian London had an organised criminal underworld. It’s
a lot less likely that there’s an organised network of aliens all
taking it in turns to invade Earth!)
Boston Blackie may well have also been a source for the character of the >Master, but Boston Blackie didn't go up into space and have adventures
with space aliens and neither did Moriarty. DuQuesne did.
None of these characters were nihilistic psychopaths like Hannibal
Lector which is all that degenerate modern writers can think of when
writing villains. These imbeciles can't write intelligent villains that
can rationally justify their actions any more. Missy was a shit attempt
to characterize the Master, and John Sim doesn't fair much better.
I don’t remember them ever mentioning this Blackie bloke.
Well, can you cite any examples of Dicks or Letts mentioning him?
It's up to you to prove me wrong using logical argument and literary >analysis. Dicks and Letts aren't going to reveal that they plagiarized E
E Smith and other writers while they were still in copyright. Douglas
Adams' The Pirate Planet is directly based on themes and ideas derived E
E Smith's Lensman novels. It's blatantly obvious to anyone who has read
them.
You probably don't realize that Davros came from Edgar Rice
Burroughs The Master Mind of Mars and Synthetic Men of Mars which
is where the plot of Genesis of the Daleks came from. Davros is
Ras Thavas with his first and last names reversed (Thava Ras) which
is something ERB does with the name of one of the characters in the novel. >>>
And now you shift the goalposts to a totally different Doctor Who
villain who just happens to remind you of a totally different character
from a totally different pulp novel for totally different reasons.
And this one isn’t even called Blackie!
I'm not shifting any goalposts you stupid deranged imbecile. I'm giving
you examples of the origin of other characters in Doctor Who to
demonstrate your lack of knowledge.
Are you going to deny that the appearance of the Dalek creatures, ie.
the Dals/Kaleds ultimate form comes from the end of H G Well's The Time >Machine?
Here's another one. Superman was directly based on John Carter of Mars,
also a character created by ERB (admitted by Siegal but obvious to
anyone who has read the Barsoom series without knowing a single thing
Siegal said). Also The Green Lantern was derived from E E Smith's
Lensman series.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." -William Shatner
On 11/11/2024 15:54, Blueshirt wrote:
Of course not, as Jodie Whittaker was cast as a female
Doctor, which was a big no-no to some fans. It also
disproves the argument put forth above by your 'buddy' that
you gave Jodie a chance. Some people did, some people
didn't. Your posts here made it quite clear at the time
which position you took though. You were never going to
accept a female Doctor full stop.
And all you've done since then is to bleat about her era
being retconned twenty times a week here like a broken
record...
There's nothing wrong with disapproving of a male character
being gender swapped in order to satisfy and bunch of deranged
woke activist retards who totally hate the show and everything
it stands for and out of spite want to destroy it for everyone
that loved it.
On 11/11/2024 08:00, solar imbecile wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 10/11/2024 22:08, solar imbecile wrote:
The True loon totally lost it:
At least he is capable of running the US better than fellow Canadian >>>>> Kamala Harris
Canadian? I thought she had to be a natural born U.S. citizen
to run for President.
She was brought up and educated in Canada and spent more of her life
there than in the US.
So I guess that means you don’t identify as Greek or Cypriot any more?
who should be the one locked up in a psycho ward after her
incoherent word salads and condescending attitude towards the entire >>>>> electorate.
You’re the only one allowed to do incoherent word salads and
condescending attitudes! No fake Canadian is going to steal
your gimmick!
I don't do incoherent word salads. That's the woke far left's territory. >>>
Have you read any of your own posts?
Yes, and they all make perfect sense to those who are not of very low >intelligence.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." -William Shatner
On 11/11/2024 09:46, Daniel70 wrote:
The True Doctor wrote on 11/11/24 7:08 am:
On 10/11/2024 12:29, Blueshirt wrote:
<Snip>
Coming from somebody who was also posting here on RADW against
a female Doctor from day one (i.e. the day of and after Jodie
Whittaker's casting.) I don't know how you can seriously claim
you gave her a chance. The evidence proves otherwise.
Of course he gave her a chance. He watched her first episode just like
over 10 million other people including myself. Giving someone a chance
don't mean you have to support and believe in them from the very
start. In fact it means the exact opposite, not supporting or
believing in them but letting them try to persuade you otherwise.
When you watched the first 'DoctorDavid' episode, were you thinking
"This is going to be the best thing since sliced bread" ..... or were
you thinking "This could be all right, I'll give it a go and see what
happens??"
The latter.
Same Situation .... this time for 'JodieDoctor'??
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." -William Shatner
On 2024-11-11 16:17:54 +0000, Blueshirt said:
Your Name wrote:
On 2024-11-10 20:46:32 +0000, Blueshirt said:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 10/11/2024 12:35, Blueshirt wrote:
In retrospect, some people might consider the casting of
Jodie Whittaker a blunder if they were unhappy with her
era once that had seen it... but they didn't know that
in July 2017.
They knew she was a woman and that the Doctor was
established as a masculine male character for over 50
years.
They also knew that it had already been established in the
show that Time Lords can change gender... following the
General and your favourite incarnation of the Master, Missy.
So the Doctor following suit wasn't a completely
revolutionary idea to fans of the show.
The way you go on about it you'd swear it had never been done
before...
The gender-swapping / ethnicity-swapping nonsense was only
fully "established" relatively recently and explicity so that
the show's makers could increase the Politically Correct quota
tickboxing. Before that there was at best only vague hints or
joking lines of dialogue.
True, but we do live in a world where, rightly or wrongly, people can,
and do, change their gender. So the BBC might have decided they wanted
their TV shows to represent the world that people live in today.
The entertainment studios have been forced by Politically Corerct
idiots to have quotas of women, non-white people, and disabled people
in their shows. It's simply a lot cheaper and easier for them to simply
swap an existing white male character than to actually be creative and
make *NEW* shows and characters. :-(
For a fictional TV show about an alien time-traveller than can already
change their body, face, hair (etc.)
Then why hasn't there ever been a version of the Doctor as a blue blob >creature, or flying squirrel character, or a stick insect, ... or even
as a Dalek?? If you assume the Time Lords can choose, at least to some >degree, their next incarnation and the Doctor chooses to always look
human, then why "coincidentally" decide to change gender or colour now
after all the previous versions? There is no sensible in-show
explanation because it's based purely on the current Political
Correctness idiocy going on everywhere. :-(
I didn't have a problem with Missy as a female Master. I actually thought
Michelle Gomez did a good job, even though her character could quite
easily have been the Rani instead, as we did already have a female Time
Lord villain established in the show. But a gender-swapping alien from
a body-swapping one isn't a big-leap for me in a sci-fi type of show. I
am a Doctor Who fan, I just want the stories to be good and enjoyable.
"Good and enjoyable" in Doctor Who stopped a LONG time ago. :-p
On 11/11/2024 15:54, Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <vgsjps$u21i$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The True Doctor wrote on 11/11/24 7:08 am:
Of course he gave her a chance. He watched her first
episode just like over 10 million other people including
myself. Giving someone a chance don't mean you have to
support and believe in them from the very start. In fact
it means the exact opposite, not supporting or believing in
them but letting them try to persuade you otherwise.
When you watched the first 'DoctorDavid' episode, were you
thinking "This is going to be the best thing since sliced
bread" ..... or were you thinking "This could be all right,
I'll give it a go and see what happens??"
Yes!
Same Situation .... this time for 'JodieDoctor'??
No!
Of course not, as Jodie Whittaker was cast as a female Doctor,
which was a big no-no to some fans. It also disproves the
argument put forth above by your 'buddy' that you gave Jodie a
chance. Some people did, some people didn't. Your posts here
made it quite clear at the time which position you took though.
You were never going to accept a female Doctor full stop.
And all you've done since then is to bleat about her era being
retconned twenty times a week here like a broken record...
There's nothing wrong with disapproving of a male character being gender >swapped in order to satisfy and bunch of deranged woke activist retards
who totally hate the show and everything it stands for and out of spite
want to destroy it for everyone that loved it.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." -William Shatner
Your Name wrote:
On 2024-11-11 16:17:54 +0000, Blueshirt said:
Your Name wrote:
The gender-swapping / ethnicity-swapping nonsense was only
fully "established" relatively recently and explicity so
that the show's makers could increase the Politically
Correct quota tickboxing. Before that there was at best
only vague hints or joking lines of dialogue.
True, but we do live in a world where, rightly or wrongly,
people can, and do, change their gender. So the BBC might
have decided they wanted their TV shows to represent the
world that people live in today.
The entertainment studios have been forced by Politically
Corerct idiots to have quotas of women, non-white people, and
disabled people in their shows. It's simply a lot cheaper and
easier for them to simply swap an existing white male
character than to actually be creative and make NEW shows and
characters. :-(
Wait until Jane Bond hits the screens one day in the future...
For a fictional TV show about an alien time-traveller than
can already change their body, face, hair (etc.)
Then why hasn't there ever been a version of the Doctor as a
blue blob creature, or flying squirrel character, or a stick
insect, ... or even as a Dalek??
Well, we did get a look at a Time-Lord choosing different
species when Romana was regenerating at the beginning of
"Destiny of the Daleks"... before she settled on her Princess
Astra face/body. So never say never, it could well happen again.
It'll be more down to the cost of the special FX required for
the Doctor to be non-humanoid more than anything else though.
There is no sensible in-show explanation because it's based
purely on the current Political Correctness idiocy going on
everywhere. :-(
Yes, that may well be the out of universe reason but in-universe
it works for me... The Doctor is a Time Lord and Time Lords can
change their body. I'm fine with that. They can change whatever
they want about it as far as I'm concerned, just write the damn
thing to be entertaining! That's the issue I have. I'd rather
have a black female Doctor with a great script than a white male
Doctor with a shitty script.
I am a Doctor Who fan, I just want the stories to be
good and enjoyable.
"Good and enjoyable" in Doctor Who stopped a LONG time ago.
:-p
Nah, when it's good it's good... when it's bad, it can be bad.
But I do try to be a half-full type of guy. I always hope for
the best.
Roll on Christmas Day.
In article <xn0ot7kv5bdapjl001@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Your Name wrote:
"Good and enjoyable" in Doctor Who stopped a LONG time ago.
:-p
Nah, when it's good it's good... when it's bad, it can be
bad. But I do try to be a half-full type of guy. I always
hope for the best.
Roll on Christmas Day.
What are you drinking?
In article <xn0ot7l47bdntws002@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
From what I see the only people that seem to hate the show
are the self-entitled fans that think the show is about what
they want it to be. Then throw their toys out of the pram
when it's not. The biggest enemy of Doctor Who has ALWAYS
been its fans.
If you don't like Doctor Who, that's fine. Don't watch it
then! It's not hard to avoid a television show that you
don't like.
I refuse to watch a ton of stuff on the TV that I know I
won't like. (S2 of Rings of Power being the latest example.)
Why do Doctor Who fans persevere with watching Doctor Who
and continue bleating about it? You'll achieve just as much
in life by going outside, shaking your fist at the sky and
screaming "Down with the modern world"!
And now that RTD 2 is around ...
Your Name wrote:
On 2024-11-11 16:17:54 +0000, Blueshirt said:
Your Name wrote:
The gender-swapping / ethnicity-swapping nonsense was only
fully "established" relatively recently and explicity so
that the show's makers could increase the Politically
Correct quota tickboxing. Before that there was at best
only vague hints or joking lines of dialogue.
True, but we do live in a world where, rightly or wrongly,
people can, and do, change their gender. So the BBC might
have decided they wanted their TV shows to represent the
world that people live in today.
The entertainment studios have been forced by Politically
Corerct idiots to have quotas of women, non-white people, and
disabled people in their shows. It's simply a lot cheaper and
easier for them to simply swap an existing white male
character than to actually be creative and make NEW shows and
characters. :-(
Wait until Jane Bond hits the screens one day in the future...
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0ot7kv5bdapjl001@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Your Name wrote:
"Good and enjoyable" in Doctor Who stopped a LONG time ago.
:-p
Nah, when it's good it's good... when it's bad, it can be
bad. But I do try to be a half-full type of guy. I always
hope for the best.
Roll on Christmas Day.
What are you drinking?
This is RADW, show some positivity for our favourite TV show or
take your business elsewhere...
On 2024-11-12 00:19:43 +0000, Blueshirt said:
Your Name wrote:
On 2024-11-11 16:17:54 +0000, Blueshirt said:
Your Name wrote:
The gender-swapping / ethnicity-swapping nonsense was only
fully "established" relatively recently and explicity so
that the show's makers could increase the Politically
Correct quota tickboxing. Before that there was at best
only vague hints or joking lines of dialogue.
True, but we do live in a world where, rightly or wrongly,
people can, and do, change their gender. So the BBC might
have decided they wanted their TV shows to represent the
world that people live in today.
The entertainment studios have been forced by Politically
Corerct idiots to have quotas of women, non-white people, and
disabled people in their shows. It's simply a lot cheaper and
easier for them to simply swap an existing white male
character than to actually be creative and make NEW shows and
characters. :-(
Wait until Jane Bond hits the screens one day in the future...
As long as it is a *new* character, then there's no problem. The
problem is when they hijack an existing character for idiotic >gender/ethnicity-swapping.
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0ot7l47bdntws002@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
From what I see the only people that seem to hate the show
are the self-entitled fans that think the show is about what
they want it to be. Then throw their toys out of the pram
when it's not. The biggest enemy of Doctor Who has ALWAYS
been its fans.
If you don't like Doctor Who, that's fine. Don't watch it
then! It's not hard to avoid a television show that you
don't like.
I refuse to watch a ton of stuff on the TV that I know I
won't like. (S2 of Rings of Power being the latest example.)
Why do Doctor Who fans persevere with watching Doctor Who
and continue bleating about it? You'll achieve just as much
in life by going outside, shaking your fist at the sky and
screaming "Down with the modern world"!
And now that RTD 2 is around ...
RTD was the saviour remember? When Chris Chibnall was being
pilloried here by you, you were also welcoming the return of
RTD... will you ever be happy?
You could become a Star Trek fan [again] and relocate to one of
their newsgroups if you'd prefer a change of scenery...
On 12/11/2024 01:00, Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0ot7kv5bdapjl001@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Your Name wrote:
"Good and enjoyable" in Doctor Who stopped a LONG time ago.
:-p
Nah, when it's good it's good... when it's bad, it can be
bad. But I do try to be a half-full type of guy. I always
hope for the best.
Roll on Christmas Day.
What are you drinking?
This is RADW, show some positivity for our favourite TV show or
take your business elsewhere...
How can people be positive when their favourite show ended in 2017 and there's no sight of it being brought back the way it was?
On 17/11/2024 23:20, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 17/11/2024 21:16, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 17/11/2024 15:11, Blueshirt wrote:
Cheer up, the glass isn't always half-empty... Doctor Who
will be returning to a PC monitor near you in just 38
days time!
No it won't. It ended in 2017 and there's no revival in
sight.
You are a right ol' misery guts at times aren't you?
Lighten up man. Whatever happens, at least you've got
something to come here and moan about on Christmas Day
haven't you? So even if you're not looking forward to "Joy
to the World" you're surely looking forward to complaining
about it here?!
Look at it as a win/win.
Joy to the Woke more like. It's not being made for the
intelligent majority.
You've seen the episode already?
I've seen a preview of it on CIN.
Happy Christmas!
I will be happy when Doctor Whoke is cancelled.
That's exactly what the "woke" crowd do... cancel things because
they don't like them!
The woke cancel things because others like them because they can't have
them.
DanielSo you have become what you constantly complain about.--
The True Doctor wrote:
On 12/11/2024 01:00, Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0ot7kv5bdapjl001@post.eweka.nl>, Blueshirt
<blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Roll on Christmas Day.
What are you drinking?
This is RADW, show some positivity for our favourite TV show or
take your business elsewhere...
How can people be positive when their favourite show ended in 2017
and there's no sight of it being brought back the way it was?
Cheer up, the glass isn't always half-empty
... Doctor Who will be returning to a PC monitor near you in just 38
days time!
I bet you are so excited...
Your Name wrote:
On 2024-11-17 10:46:32 +0000, Daniel70 said:
Is it the "Agatha Raisin" actress?? Can't say I've made that
connection.
Yep. Ashley Jensen is the new "Shetland" detective and played
the title role in "Agatha Raisin", among many other shows.
Americans may know her better from the US show "Ugly Betty".
Her 'big break' is often said to have been in Ricky Gervais'
supposed-comedy "Extras", but she had mainly smaller roles in
many shows before that.
There have been rumours about a new fifth season of "Agatha
Raisin", but nothing concrete yet.
I could never get in to "Agatha Raisin", I found it too comedic
at times... especially the bumbling police man.
Ashley Jensen is hot though...
Blueshirt wrote on 18/11/24 8:21 am:
I could never get in to "Agatha Raisin", I found it too
comedic at times... especially the bumbling police man.
Ashley Jensen is hot though...
But aren't the cops always bumbling ("Agatha Raisin", "Father
Brown", "Shakespeare & Hathaway", "Harry Wild", "Miss Scarlet
and The Duke" .... Do you get the idea I watch a few British
'Police' series??) when they are just the 'outsiders', unlike
say, 'The Bill' (yes, it's been a while) and 'Vera'!!
In article <xn0otfhon133a1r004@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <vhd7lc$nvc5$1@dont-email.me>,
The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Incidentally, on the RTE Player Ncuti Gatwa's first
season is listed as Doctor Who "Season 24" and the four
2023 special episodes are listed as "Season 23"...
So really, by year. That would make the first six episodes
of the classic show “Season 63”.
Argh!
Well, it would be easily understood once you knew what you
were on about. So, there is a kind of logic to it.
Illogic you mean.
No one likes Doctor Whoke. It was created to alienate and
disenfranchises Doctor Who fans in order to satisfy a
degenerate minority of perverted activists that hate
heterosexual men and masculinity and want to sexually groom
children. [© The Anti-Insoc League]
Blueshirt wrote:
Happy Christmas!
A TAD early, aren't you, Blueshirt?? (Yes, I can be a Grinch
at times.)
The True Doctor wrote on 17/11/24 11:00 am:
On 12/11/2024 01:00, Blueshirt wrote:
This is RADW, show some positivity for our favourite TV
show or take your business elsewhere...
How can people be positive when their favourite show ended
in 2017 and there's no sight of it being brought back the
way it was?
"2017"?? How DARE you, Aggy?? Surely everyone knows "Doctor
Who" finished in 1989 .... or 1996 .... or 2017 ..... or 2023
.... or is ongoing!!
Blueshirt wrote on 18/11/24 8:21 am:
Your Name wrote:But aren't the cops always bumbling ("Agatha Raisin", "Father Brown", >"Shakespeare & Hathaway", "Harry Wild", "Miss Scarlet and The Duke" ....
On 2024-11-17 10:46:32 +0000, Daniel70 said:
Is it the "Agatha Raisin" actress?? Can't say I've made that
connection.
Yep. Ashley Jensen is the new "Shetland" detective and played
the title role in "Agatha Raisin", among many other shows.
Americans may know her better from the US show "Ugly Betty".
Her 'big break' is often said to have been in Ricky Gervais'
supposed-comedy "Extras", but she had mainly smaller roles in
many shows before that.
There have been rumours about a new fifth season of "Agatha
Raisin", but nothing concrete yet.
I could never get in to "Agatha Raisin", I found it too comedic
at times... especially the bumbling police man.
Ashley Jensen is hot though...
Do you get the idea I watch a few British 'Police' series??) when they
are just the 'outsiders', unlike say, 'The Bill' (yes, it's been a
while) and 'Vera'!!
--
Daniel
The True Doctor wrote on 17/11/24 11:00 am:
On 12/11/2024 01:00, Blueshirt wrote:"2017"?? How DARE you, Aggy?? Surely everyone knows "Doctor Who"
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0ot7kv5bdapjl001@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Your Name wrote:
"Good and enjoyable" in Doctor Who stopped a LONG time ago.
:-p
Nah, when it's good it's good... when it's bad, it can be
bad. But I do try to be a half-full type of guy. I always
hope for the best.
Roll on Christmas Day.
What are you drinking?
This is RADW, show some positivity for our favourite TV show or
take your business elsewhere...
How can people be positive when their favourite show ended in 2017 and
there's no sight of it being brought back the way it was?
finished in 1989 .... or 1996 .... or 2017 ..... or 2023 .... or is
ongoing!!
--
Daniel
The True Doctor wrote:
No one likes Doctor Whoke. It was created to alienate and
disenfranchises Doctor Who fans in order to satisfy a
degenerate minority of perverted activists that hate
heterosexual men and masculinity and want to sexually groom
children. [© The Anti-Insoc League]
Keep it up. George Orwell would be proud of you!
In article <vhf3fn$16dln$2@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
Idlehands wrote on 18/11/24 3:35 pm:
Poor binky, "runs" and ISP but has no clue how to thread
messages or follow a thread.
I answered his questions (through your post) but he can't
see it what a sad excuse for a Sys Admin.
Lying Idlehands lies again!
Yes, how sad!!
Don't be sad! Ban Idlehands!
In article <xn0otgmviksn3nl006@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
"2017"?? How DARE you, Aggy?? Surely everyone knows "Doctor
Who" finished in 1989 .... or 1996 .... or 2017 ..... or
2023.... or is ongoing!!
It looks like it finished for you when the BBC done the deal
with Disney! :-)
Disney is is chaos!
How about partners like CBC, AustBC, and TVNZ ?
Daniel70 wrote:
The True Doctor wrote on 17/11/24 11:00 am:
On 12/11/2024 01:00, Blueshirt wrote:
This is RADW, show some positivity for our favourite TV
show or take your business elsewhere...
How can people be positive when their favourite show ended
in 2017 and there's no sight of it being brought back the
way it was?
"2017"?? How DARE you, Aggy?? Surely everyone knows "Doctor
Who" finished in 1989 .... or 1996 .... or 2017 ..... or 2023
.... or is ongoing!!
It looks like it finished for you when the BBC done the deal
with Disney! :-)
Daniel70 wrote:
Blueshirt wrote:
Happy Christmas!
A TAD early, aren't you, Blueshirt?? (Yes, I can be a Grinch
at times.)
Tell that to the shops...
The Doctor wrote:
In article <vhf3fn$16dln$2@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
Idlehands wrote on 18/11/24 3:35 pm:
Poor binky, "runs" and ISP but has no clue how to thread
messages or follow a thread.
I answered his questions (through your post) but he can't
see it what a sad excuse for a Sys Admin.
Lying Idlehands lies again!
Yes, how sad!!
Don't be sad! Ban Idlehands!
RADW is a free space for all. If you don't want to read posts
from certain people, killfile them...
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0otgmviksn3nl006@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
"2017"?? How DARE you, Aggy?? Surely everyone knows "Doctor
Who" finished in 1989 .... or 1996 .... or 2017 ..... or
2023.... or is ongoing!!
It looks like it finished for you when the BBC done the deal
with Disney! :-)
Disney is is chaos!
How about partners like CBC, AustBC, and TVNZ ?
IIRC the BBC had those networks as partners for overseas
distribution of their popular television programmes. At a guess,
I'd say the Disney Corporation gave the BBC more money than
those other partners could.
Daniel70 wrote:
Blueshirt wrote on 18/11/24 8:21 am:
I could never get in to "Agatha Raisin", I found it too
comedic at times... especially the bumbling police man.
Ashley Jensen is hot though...
But aren't the cops always bumbling ("Agatha Raisin", "Father
Brown", "Shakespeare & Hathaway", "Harry Wild", "Miss Scarlet
and The Duke" .... Do you get the idea I watch a few British
'Police' series??) when they are just the 'outsiders', unlike
say, 'The Bill' (yes, it's been a while) and 'Vera'!!
Nah, there's bumbling to show how clever the 'detective' is and
then there's BUMBLING, as in played for laughs!
I'll take Miss Marple over these modern day sleuths any day...
Blueshirt wrote on 18/11/24 8:21 am:
Your Name wrote:
On 2024-11-17 10:46:32 +0000, Daniel70 said:
Is it the "Agatha Raisin" actress?? Can't say I've made that
connection.
Yep. Ashley Jensen is the new "Shetland" detective and played
the title role in "Agatha Raisin", among many other shows.
Americans may know her better from the US show "Ugly Betty".
Her 'big break' is often said to have been in Ricky Gervais'
supposed-comedy "Extras", but she had mainly smaller roles in
many shows before that.
There have been rumours about a new fifth season of "Agatha
Raisin", but nothing concrete yet.
I could never get in to "Agatha Raisin", I found it too comedic
at times... especially the bumbling police man.
Ashley Jensen is hot though...
But aren't the cops always bumbling ("Agatha Raisin", "Father Brown", "Shakespeare & Hathaway", "Harry Wild", "Miss Scarlet and The Duke"
.... Do you get the idea I watch a few British 'Police' series??) when
they are just the 'outsiders', unlike say, 'The Bill' (yes, it's been a while) and 'Vera'!!
The Doctor wrote:
In article <vhf3fn$16dln$2@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
Idlehands wrote on 18/11/24 3:35 pm:
Poor binky, "runs" and ISP but has no clue how to thread
messages or follow a thread.
I answered his questions (through your post) but he can't
see it what a sad excuse for a Sys Admin.
Lying Idlehands lies again!
Yes, how sad!!
Don't be sad! Ban Idlehands!
RADW is a free space for all. If you don't want to read posts
from certain people, killfile them...
On 2024-11-18 10:22:25 +0000, Daniel70 said:
Blueshirt wrote on 18/11/24 8:21 am:
Your Name wrote:
On 2024-11-17 10:46:32 +0000, Daniel70 said:
Is it the "Agatha Raisin" actress?? Can't say I've made that
connection.
Yep. Ashley Jensen is the new "Shetland" detective and played
the title role in "Agatha Raisin", among many other shows.
Americans may know her better from the US show "Ugly Betty".
Her 'big break' is often said to have been in Ricky Gervais'
supposed-comedy "Extras", but she had mainly smaller roles in
many shows before that.
There have been rumours about a new fifth season of "Agatha
Raisin", but nothing concrete yet.
I could never get in to "Agatha Raisin", I found it too comedic
at times... especially the bumbling police man.
Ashley Jensen is hot though...
But aren't the cops always bumbling ("Agatha Raisin", "Father Brown",
"Shakespeare & Hathaway", "Harry Wild", "Miss Scarlet and The Duke"
.... Do you get the idea I watch a few British 'Police' series??) when
they are just the 'outsiders', unlike say, 'The Bill' (yes, it's been a
while) and 'Vera'!!
Yep. The idea that the private investigator is smarter than the police
is ages old. Books like Miss Marple, Poirot, Sherlock Holmes, etc. all
had that same basic idea. It also copied over to American shows such as >"Psych" and "Monk" (although Monk was an ex-policeman).
The actor who plays the bumbling detective in "Agatha Raisin" was in
"The Bill" towards the end as a police crime scene investigator (he was >actually in "The Bill" as three different characters over the years).
The True Doctor wrote on 17/11/24 11:00 am:
On 12/11/2024 01:00, Blueshirt wrote:"2017"?? How DARE you, Aggy?? Surely everyone knows "Doctor Who"
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0ot7kv5bdapjl001@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Your Name wrote:
"Good and enjoyable" in Doctor Who stopped a LONG time ago.
:-p
Nah, when it's good it's good... when it's bad, it can be
bad. But I do try to be a half-full type of guy. I always
hope for the best.
Roll on Christmas Day.
What are you drinking?
This is RADW, show some positivity for our favourite TV show or
take your business elsewhere...
How can people be positive when their favourite show ended in 2017 and
there's no sight of it being brought back the way it was?
finished in 1989 .... or 1996 .... or 2017 ..... or 2023 .... or is
ongoing!!
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The True Doctor wrote on 17/11/24 11:00 am:
On 12/11/2024 01:00, Blueshirt wrote:"2017"?? How DARE you, Aggy?? Surely everyone knows "Doctor Who"
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0ot7kv5bdapjl001@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Your Name wrote:
"Good and enjoyable" in Doctor Who stopped a LONG time ago.
:-p
Nah, when it's good it's good... when it's bad, it can be
bad. But I do try to be a half-full type of guy. I always
hope for the best.
Roll on Christmas Day.
What are you drinking?
This is RADW, show some positivity for our favourite TV show or
take your business elsewhere...
How can people be positive when their favourite show ended in 2017 and
there's no sight of it being brought back the way it was?
finished in 1989 .... or 1996 .... or 2017 ..... or 2023 .... or is
ongoing!!
1966! They changed the lead character actor into a much younger man with
the flimsy excuse of “renewal”! I can’t believe it! The show is over, >everything since Hartnell was ignominiously let go is FAKE! Doctor Who?
More like Doctor HOW! I haven’t watched a single episode since. (Review of >“Inferno” to follow, but I warn you, 0/10! No Hartnell, no show!)
--
“Most of the Universe is knackered, babes.” - The Doctor
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The True Doctor wrote on 17/11/24 11:00 am:
How can people be positive when their favourite show ended
in 2017 and there's no sight of it being brought back the
way it was?
"2017"?? How DARE you, Aggy?? Surely everyone knows "Doctor
Who" finished in 1989 .... or 1996 .... or 2017 ..... or
2023 .... or is ongoing!!
1966! They changed the lead character actor into a much
younger man with the flimsy excuse of “renewal”! I can’t
believe it! The show is over, everything since Hartnell was
ignominiously let go is FAKE! Doctor Who? More like Doctor
HOW! I haven’t watched a single episode since. (Review of
“Inferno” to follow, but I warn you, 0/10! No Hartnell, no
show!)
In article <vhv1ho$274u5$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 24/11/24 12:39 am:
In article <vhsb27$1lsrp$2@dont-email.me>,How STUPID are YOU, Gobble-de-gook? If I knew what little SECT of a
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 23/11/24 9:53 am:
In article <vhq2c4$16oiv$3@dont-email.me>, Daniel70
<daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 22/11/24 11:15 pm:
In article <vhpmaa$14rnm$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel70
<daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
Idlehands wrote on 22/11/24 5:34 pm:
<Snip>
Binky believes his sect is the only "Christians" and will be >>>>>>>>> the only ones going to Heaven. This "belief" allows himThe thing that gets me, most, is that Gobble-de-gook is SOOOOOO >>>>>>>> Proud of HIS little SECT that he will not even NAME the sect!! >>>>>>>>
to heap scorn and hatred on other sects and denominations and >>>>>>>>> especially Muslims.
He really is a faux Christian wallowing in his ignorance.
Church of England?? Church of Scotland?? Methodist?? Salvation >>>>>>>> Army?? Eastern Orthodoxy?? .... Oh, No, there's the one ....
*Pentecostal/Charismatic* !!
All of which protests the Crimes of Rome!
The thing that gets me, most, is that Gobble-de-gook is SOOOOOO
Proud of HIS little SECT that he will not even NAME the sect!!
Yet you know.
If I knew, Gobble-de-gook, I'd probably be too bust laughing to comment, >>>> Gobble-de-gook!!
Yet you know.
Church YOU, Gobble-de-gook, belonged to, why would I be asking now,
Gobble-de-gook?
Yet you know.
In article <vhv1sb$274u5$3@dont-email.me>, Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 24/11/24 12:51 am:
In article <vhsbbr$1lurc$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel70
<daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 23/11/24 9:54 am:
Well I've got ZERO idea what "Ilols" are, Gobble-de-gook, so I'llAlso how many visible idols are ther in the RCC?
None, Gobble-de-gook!!
So no Ilols of Jesus Christ and Mother Mary in the RCC?
say *NO* !! -- Daniel
And Idols of Jesus Christ and Mother MAry?
On 2024-11-24 11:22:53 +0000, Daniel70 said:
Your Name wrote on 24/11/24 9:25 am:
On 2024-11-23 11:00:18 +0000, Daniel70 said:
The Doctor wrote on 23/11/24 10:00 am:
In article <vhqskl$1biil$1@dont-email.me>,
Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:
On 2024-11-22 15:08:53 +0000, Blueshirt said:
Daniel70 wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 22/11/24 3:47 am:
The Pope does not represent Christianity.
Correct ..... just the MOST POPULUS strain of Christianity,
Gobble-de-gook.
Covid-19 was also a popular strain!
Plus, popular doesn't necessary equal right. :-)
Yep. VHS, Windows OS, and Tesla cars are three other "popular" but >>>>>> incredibly stupid things. Usually what sells the most is the cheapest >>>>>> option rather than the best option.
VHS was much better then Beta!
Beta was Better!! Hence the NAME!!
Betamax was the easily better format for picture quality, but lost
out to the cheaper VHS which also had longer recording times. Beta
was (and probably still is in some places) the choice for
professional film and TV makers.
Sort of suggests something that most (if not all) the 'on location'
T.V. News Cameras of the mid-80's onwards were BetaCams!!
Betamax and Betacam are similar in some ways, but different in others. Betacam was better than Betamax. They did use the same type of video cassette, but the video formats themselves were not interchagable.
On 2024-11-24 23:01:51 +0000, Blueshirt said:
The Doctor wrote:
And Idols of Jesus Christ and Mother MAry?
Most Christian churches have a depiction of a cross with
Jewsus on it somewhere within them as a symbol of the
crucifiction ... is that not idolatry?
Jewsus ... that must be the Jewish version.
The crucifix kind of contradicts the second commandment
too... well, for those that worship it anyway. Obviously, I
don't!
But the over-ruling First Commandment is: "Don't use your own
brain - blindly follow whatever garbage the priest says." :-p
In article <xn0otpfkxtv8hzp005@news.eternal-september.org>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
And Idols of Jesus Christ and Mother MAry?
Most Christian churches have a depiction of a cross with
Jewsus on it somewhere within them as a symbol of the
crucification ... is that not idolatry?
The crucifix kind of contradicts the second commandment
too... well, for those that worship it anyway. Obviously, I
don't!
Have you been to a protestant church?
Your Name wrote:
On 2024-11-24 23:01:51 +0000, Blueshirt said:
The Doctor wrote:
And Idols of Jesus Christ and Mother MAry?
Most Christian churches have a depiction of a cross with
Jewsus on it somewhere within them as a symbol of the
crucifiction ... is that not idolatry?
Jewsus ... that must be the Jewish version.
Exactly!
Christianity derived from Judaism so it's apt.
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0otpfkxtv8hzp005@news.eternal-september.org>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
And Idols of Jesus Christ and Mother MAry?
Most Christian churches have a depiction of a cross with Jewsus
on it somewhere within them as a symbol of the crucification ...
is that not idolatry?
The crucifix kind of contradicts the second commandment too...
well, for those that worship it anyway. Obviously, I don't!
Have you been to a protestant church?
Probably, but I'm usually shaking too much to pay much attention to
my surroundings.
You do know my real name is Damien, right?
Blueshirt wrote on 25/11/24 10:59 pm:
Your Name wrote:
On 2024-11-24 23:01:51 +0000, Blueshirt said:
Most Christian churches have a depiction of a cross with
Jewsus on it somewhere within them as a symbol of the
crucifiction ... is that not idolatry?
Jewsus ... that must be the Jewish version.
Exactly!
Christianity derived from Judaism so it's apt.
I've typed it before and I'll type it again ....
"Christianity is a Jewish Sect!!"
Blueshirt wrote on 25/11/24 11:07 pm:
The Doctor wrote:
Have you been to a protestant church?
Probably, but I'm usually shaking too much to pay much
attention to my surroundings.
You do know my real name is Damien, right?
I sure hope that's a JOKE, Blueshirt ..... else Mrs Blueshirt
had better watch out!!
Blueshirt wrote on 25/11/24 10:59 pm:
Your Name wrote:
On 2024-11-24 23:01:51 +0000, Blueshirt said:
The Doctor wrote:
And Idols of Jesus Christ and Mother MAry?
Most Christian churches have a depiction of a cross with
Jewsus on it somewhere within them as a symbol of the
crucifiction ... is that not idolatry?
Jewsus ... that must be the Jewish version.
Exactly!
Christianity derived from Judaism so it's apt.
I've typed it before and I'll type it again ....
"Christianity is a Jewish Sect!!"
The Doctor wrote on 24/11/24 11:28 pm:
In article <vhv1ho$274u5$1@dont-email.me>,Heaven. This "belief" allows him >>>>>>>>>> to heap scorn and hatred on other sects and denominations and >>>>>>>>>> especially Muslims.
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 24/11/24 12:39 am:
In article <vhsb27$1lsrp$2@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 23/11/24 9:53 am:
In article <vhq2c4$16oiv$3@dont-email.me>, Daniel70
<daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 22/11/24 11:15 pm:
In article <vhpmaa$14rnm$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel70
<daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
Idlehands wrote on 22/11/24 5:34 pm:
<Snip>
Binky believes his sect is the only "Christians" and will be >>>>>>>>>> the only ones going to
O.K., so YOU, Gobble-de-gook, MUST be too embarassed to name it/them!!How STUPID are YOU, Gobble-de-gook? If I knew what little SECT of aThe thing that gets me, most, is that Gobble-de-gook is SOOOOOO >>>>>>>>> Proud of HIS little SECT that he will not even NAME the sect!! >>>>>>>>>
He really is a faux Christian wallowing in his ignorance.
Church of England?? Church of Scotland?? Methodist?? Salvation >>>>>>>>> Army?? Eastern Orthodoxy?? .... Oh, No, there's the one .... >>>>>>>>> *Pentecostal/Charismatic* !!
All of which protests the Crimes of Rome!
The thing that gets me, most, is that Gobble-de-gook is SOOOOOO
Proud of HIS little SECT that he will not even NAME the sect!!
Yet you know.
If I knew, Gobble-de-gook, I'd probably be too bust laughing to comment, >>>>> Gobble-de-gook!!
Yet you know.
Church YOU, Gobble-de-gook, belonged to, why would I be asking now,
Gobble-de-gook?
Yet you know.
--
Daniel
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0otpfkxtv8hzp005@news.eternal-september.org>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
And Idols of Jesus Christ and Mother MAry?
Most Christian churches have a depiction of a cross with
Jewsus on it somewhere within them as a symbol of the
crucification ... is that not idolatry?
The crucifix kind of contradicts the second commandment
too... well, for those that worship it anyway. Obviously, I
don't!
Have you been to a protestant church?
Probably, but I'm usually shaking too much to pay much attention
to my surroundings.
You do know my real name is Damien, right?
Blueshirt wrote on 25/11/24 11:07 pm:
The Doctor wrote:I sure hope that's a JOKE, Blueshirt ..... else Mrs Blueshirt had better >watch out!!
In article <xn0otpfkxtv8hzp005@news.eternal-september.org>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
And Idols of Jesus Christ and Mother MAry?
Most Christian churches have a depiction of a cross with Jewsus
on it somewhere within them as a symbol of the crucification ...
is that not idolatry?
The crucifix kind of contradicts the second commandment too...
well, for those that worship it anyway. Obviously, I don't!
Have you been to a protestant church?
Probably, but I'm usually shaking too much to pay much attention to
my surroundings.
You do know my real name is Damien, right?
--
Daniel
Blueshirt wrote on 25/11/24 10:59 pm:
Your Name wrote:
On 2024-11-24 23:01:51 +0000, Blueshirt said:
The Doctor wrote:
And Idols of Jesus Christ and Mother MAry?
Most Christian churches have a depiction of a cross with
Jewsus on it somewhere within them as a symbol of the
crucifiction ... is that not idolatry?
Jewsus ... that must be the Jewish version.
Exactly!
Christianity derived from Judaism so it's apt.
I've typed it before and I'll type it again ....
"Christianity is a Jewish Sect!!"
--
Daniel
Daniel70 wrote:
Blueshirt wrote on 25/11/24 10:59 pm:
Your Name wrote:
On 2024-11-24 23:01:51 +0000, Blueshirt said:
Most Christian churches have a depiction of a cross with
Jewsus on it somewhere within them as a symbol of the
crucifiction ... is that not idolatry?
Jewsus ... that must be the Jewish version.
Exactly!
Christianity derived from Judaism so it's apt.
I've typed it before and I'll type it again ....
"Christianity is a Jewish Sect!!"
You'll get no arguments from me!
Blueshirt brought us:
Daniel70 wrote:
Blueshirt wrote:
I sure hope that's a JOKE, Blueshirt ..... else Mrs Blueshirt
You do know my real name is Damien, right?
had better watch out!!
Well, she seems happy enough... although she first came in to my
life as my Nanny when I was younger, with her Rotweiler... that
I called Dave. She's stuck around ever since to guide me on my
path...
A nice woman.
You are Jacob Rees-Mogg and I claim my five happy fish!
--
solar penguin
Daniel70 wrote:
Blueshirt wrote on 25/11/24 11:07 pm:
The Doctor wrote:I sure hope that's a JOKE, Blueshirt ..... else Mrs Blueshirt
Have you been to a protestant church?
Probably, but I'm usually shaking too much to pay much
attention to my surroundings.
You do know my real name is Damien, right?
had better watch out!!
Well, she seems happy enough... although she first came in to my
life as my Nanny when I was younger, with her Rotweiler... that
I called Dave. She's stuck around ever since to guide me on my
path...
A nice woman.
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
Blueshirt wrote on 25/11/24 10:59 pm:
Your Name wrote:
On 2024-11-24 23:01:51 +0000, Blueshirt said:
The Doctor wrote:
And Idols of Jesus Christ and Mother MAry?
Most Christian churches have a depiction of a cross with
Jewsus on it somewhere within them as a symbol of the
crucifiction ... is that not idolatry?
Jewsus ... that must be the Jewish version.
Exactly!
Christianity derived from Judaism so it's apt.
I've typed it before and I'll type it again ....
"Christianity is a Jewish Sect!!"
No sects please, I’m British.
--
“Most of the Universe is knackered, babes.” - The Doctor
In article <xn0otqcxouncgt9002@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Have you been to a protestant church?
Probably, but I'm usually shaking too much to pay much
attention to my surroundings.
You do know my real name is Damien, right?
The omen I presume.
Blueshirt brought us:
Daniel70 wrote:
Blueshirt wrote:
I sure hope that's a JOKE, Blueshirt ..... else Mrs
You do know my real name is Damien, right?
Blueshirt had better watch out!!
Well, she seems happy enough... although she first came in
to my life as my Nanny when I was younger, with her
Rotweiler... that I called Dave. She's stuck around ever
since to guide me on my path...
A nice woman.
You are Jacob Rees-Mogg and I claim my five happy fish!
True Christianty.
The Doctor wrote:
True Christianty.
Now there's an oxymoron if ever there was...
solar penguin wrote:
Blueshirt brought us:
Daniel70 wrote:
Blueshirt wrote:
I sure hope that's a JOKE, Blueshirt ..... else Mrs
You do know my real name is Damien, right?
Blueshirt had better watch out!!
Well, she seems happy enough... although she first came in
to my life as my Nanny when I was younger, with her
Rotweiler... that I called Dave. She's stuck around ever
since to guide me on my path...
A nice woman.
You are Jacob Rees-Mogg and I claim my five happy fish!
Damn! My internet disguise has finally been busted.
The Doctor wrote:
True Christianty.
Now there's an oxymoron if ever there was...
On 2024-11-25 19:52:26 +0000, Blueshirt said:
The Doctor wrote:
True Christianty.
Now there's an oxymoron if ever there was...
All religions are full of morons. ;-p
Daniel70 wrote:
Blueshirt wrote on 25/11/24 11:07 pm:
The Doctor wrote:I sure hope that's a JOKE, Blueshirt ..... else Mrs Blueshirt had
Have you been to a protestant church?
Probably, but I'm usually shaking too much to pay much attention
to my surroundings.
You do know my real name is Damien, right?
better watch out!!
Well, she seems happy enough... although she first came in to my life
as my Nanny when I was younger, with her Rotweiler... that I called
Dave. She's stuck around ever since to guide me on my path...
A nice woman.
I am hoping for a Donald J. Trump win!
That way Tim Bruening has a total mental breakdown!
The Doctor wrote on 5/11/24 5:11 pm:
I am hoping for a Donald J. Trump win!
That way Tim Bruening has a total mental breakdown!
Gee, here we are, what, eight and a bit months since we last heard from Tim .... but he's STILL in YOUR mind, Gobble-de-gook!!
The Doctor wrote:
I am hoping for a Donald J. Trump win!Maybe he met a child-less cat lady and lived happily ever after.
That way Tim Bruening has a total mental breakdown!
Woozy Song wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
I am hoping for a Donald J. Trump win!
That way Tim Bruening has a total mental breakdown!
Maybe he met a child-less cat lady and lived happily
ever after.
I reckon he's in prison... when somebody disaapears for a long time that's usually what it means.
The Doctor wrote:
I am hoping for a Donald J. Trump win!
That way Tim Bruening has a total mental breakdown!
Maybe he met a child-less cat lady and lived happily
ever after.
Daniel70 wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 5/11/24 5:11 pm:from Tim .... but he's STILL in YOUR mind, Gobble-de-gook!!
I am hoping for a Donald J. Trump win!Gee, here we are, what, eight and a bit months since we last heard
That way Tim Bruening has a total mental breakdown!
I'm almost starting to miss him...
Blueshirt wrote:
Woozy Song wrote:that's usually what it means.
The Doctor wrote:
I am hoping for a Donald J. Trump win!Maybe he met a child-less cat lady and lived happily
That way Tim Bruening has a total mental breakdown!
ever after.
I reckon he's in prison... when somebody disaapears for a long time
disappears even!
The Doctor wrote:
I am hoping for a Donald J. Trump win!Maybe he met a child-less cat lady and lived happily ever after.
That way Tim Bruening has a total mental breakdown!
The Doctor wrote on 5/11/24 5:11 pm:
I am hoping for a Donald J. Trump win!Gee, here we are, what, eight and a bit months since we last heard from
That way Tim Bruening has a total mental breakdown!
Tim .... but he's STILL in YOUR mind, Gobble-de-gook!!
--
Daniel
In article <vgctjr$1g290$2@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 5/11/24 5:11 pm:
I am hoping for a Donald J. Trump win!Gee, here we are, what, eight and a bit months since we last
That way Tim Bruening has a total mental breakdown!
heard from Tim .... but he's STILL in YOUR mind,
Gobble-de-gook!!
Daniel
The False Prophet of radw always is.
In article <xn0osyc3z7mwsrq000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Blueshirt wrote:
Woozy Song wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
I am hoping for a Donald J. Trump win!Maybe he met a child-less cat lady and lived happily
That way Tim Bruening has a total mental breakdown!
ever after.
I reckon he's in prison... when somebody disaapears for a
long time
that's usually what it means.
disappears even!
To where?
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0osyc3z7mwsrq000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Blueshirt wrote:
Woozy Song wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
I am hoping for a Donald J. Trump win!Maybe he met a child-less cat lady and lived happily
That way Tim Bruening has a total mental breakdown!
ever after.
I reckon he's in prison... when somebody disaapears for a
long time
that's usually what it means.
disappears even!
To where?
Maybe try that again Dave?
In all fairness, it took me two attempts!
Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:figures
In article <xn0osyc3z7mwsrq000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Blueshirt wrote:
Woozy Song wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
I am hoping for a Donald J. Trump win!Maybe he met a child-less cat lady and lived happily
That way Tim Bruening has a total mental breakdown!
ever after.
I reckon he's in prison... when somebody disaapears for a
long time
that's usually what it means.
disappears even!
To where?
Maybe try that again Dave?
In all fairness, it took me two attempts!
In article <E_acnX95Rv-HH7f6nZ2dnZfqnPudnZ2d@giganews.com>,
% <pursent100@gmail.com> wrote:
Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:figures
In article <xn0osyc3z7mwsrq000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Blueshirt wrote:
Woozy Song wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
I am hoping for a Donald J. Trump win!Maybe he met a child-less cat lady and lived happily
That way Tim Bruening has a total mental breakdown!
ever after.
I reckon he's in prison... when somebody disaapears for a
long time
that's usually what it means.
disappears even!
To where?
Maybe try that again Dave?
In all fairness, it took me two attempts!
It does.
--
Looks like a Republican President, Senate and Congress in the USA!
Tim Bruening must be getting ready to fight for his life!
In article <vgcevn$1dl9s$1@dont-email.me>,
Woozy Song <suzyw0ng@outlook.com> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
I am hoping for a Donald J. Trump win!Maybe he met a child-less cat lady and lived happily ever after.
That way Tim Bruening has a total mental breakdown!
If only!
In article <xn0ot6u52au7l3v000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <vgr9he$h92v$14@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 10/11/2024 20:57, Blueshirt wrote:
Stop being silly... Dave couldn't run a bath, let alone a
country.
And still he'd be doing a better job than Kamala Harris.
Harris can't even run two sentences together that make
sense. All that comes out of her is nonsensical word salad.
Why do you think she lost the election?
BS should run for Fianna Foil.
Clearly you know about as much about Irish politics as you do
about everything else... i.e. not a lot!
Every time you sit at your keyboard you prove to us all just how
little you comprehend about the world outside of your
basement... the HQ of NotKnow, Inc.
Here is a counter to your NotKnow lie:
https://www.credly.com/badges/d8b36cbf-aee0-49b9-ac7b-d35d89a4b5b3/embedded
On 11/11/2024 09:46, Daniel70 wrote:
The True Doctor wrote on 11/11/24 7:08 am:
On 10/11/2024 12:29, Blueshirt wrote:
<Snip>
Coming from somebody who was also posting here on RADW against
a female Doctor from day one (i.e. the day of and after Jodie
Whittaker's casting.) I don't know how you can seriously claim
you gave her a chance. The evidence proves otherwise.
Of course he gave her a chance. He watched her first episode just
like over 10 million other people including myself. Giving someone a
chance don't mean you have to support and believe in them from the
very start. In fact it means the exact opposite, not supporting or
believing in them but letting them try to persuade you otherwise.
When you watched the first 'DoctorDavid' episode, were you thinking
"This is going to be the best thing since sliced bread" ..... or were
you thinking "This could be all right, I'll give it a go and see what
happens??"
The latter.
Same Situation .... this time for 'JodieDoctor'??
I refuse to watch a ton of stuff on the TV that I know I won't
like. (S2 of Rings of Power being the latest example.) Why do
Doctor Who fans persevere with watching Doctor Who and continue
bleating about it? You'll achieve just as much in life by going
outside, shaking your fist at the sky and screaming "Down with
the modern world"!
Your Name wrote:
On 2024-11-11 16:17:54 +0000, Blueshirt said:
Your Name wrote:
The gender-swapping / ethnicity-swapping nonsense was only
fully "established" relatively recently and explicity so
that the show's makers could increase the Politically
Correct quota tickboxing. Before that there was at best
only vague hints or joking lines of dialogue.
True, but we do live in a world where, rightly or wrongly,
people can, and do, change their gender. So the BBC might
have decided they wanted their TV shows to represent the
world that people live in today.
The entertainment studios have been forced by Politically
Corerct idiots to have quotas of women, non-white people, and
disabled people in their shows. It's simply a lot cheaper and
easier for them to simply swap an existing white male
character than to actually be creative and make NEW shows and
characters. :-(
Wait until Jane Bond hits the screens one day in the future...
For a fictional TV show about an alien time-traveller than
can already change their body, face, hair (etc.)
Then why hasn't there ever been a version of the Doctor as a
blue blob creature, or flying squirrel character, or a stick
insect, ... or even as a Dalek??
Well, we did get a look at a Time-Lord choosing different
species when Romana was regenerating at the beginning of
"Destiny of the Daleks' ... before she settled on her Princess > Astra face/body. So never say never, it could well happen again.
It'll be more down to the cost of the special FX required for
the Doctor to be non-humanoid more than anything else though.
Blueshirt brought us:
If you don't like Doctor Who, that's fine. Don't watch it then!
It's not hard to avoid a television show that you don't like.
I refuse to watch a ton of stuff on the TV that I know I won't
like. (S2 of Rings of Power being the latest example.) Why do
Doctor Who fans persevere with watching Doctor Who and continue
bleating about it? You'll achieve just as much in life by going
outside, shaking your fist at the sky and screaming "Down with
the modern world"!
To be fair, Aggy probably does that too.
--
solar penguin
Blueshirt wrote on 12/11/24 11:29 am:
<Snip>
I refuse to watch a ton of stuff on the TV that I know I won'tWas the line from the film something like "I'm mad as hell and I'm not
like. (S2 of Rings of Power being the latest example.) Why do
Doctor Who fans persevere with watching Doctor Who and continue
bleating about it? You'll achieve just as much in life by going
outside, shaking your fist at the sky and screaming "Down with
the modern world"!
going to take it anymore"??
(NOTE: 'something like' as, apparently, this is a widely accepted >MIS-QUOTE!!)
--
Daniel
The Doctor wrote on 12/11/24 11:19 am:
In article <xn0ot6u52au7l3v000@post.eweka.nl>,Quote
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <vgr9he$h92v$14@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 10/11/2024 20:57, Blueshirt wrote:
Stop being silly... Dave couldn't run a bath, let alone a
country.
And still he'd be doing a better job than Kamala Harris.
Harris can't even run two sentences together that make
sense. All that comes out of her is nonsensical word salad.
Why do you think she lost the election?
BS should run for Fianna Foil.
Clearly you know about as much about Irish politics as you do
about everything else... i.e. not a lot!
Every time you sit at your keyboard you prove to us all just how
little you comprehend about the world outside of your
basement... the HQ of NotKnow, Inc.
Here is a counter to your NotKnow lie:
https://www.credly.com/badges/d8b36cbf-aee0-49b9-ac7b-d35d89a4b5b3/embedded >>
"This badge was issued to Dave Shariff Yadallee Mr. on August 29, 2024 >Expires on August 29, 2027"
End Quote
How does that refute Blueshirt's claims, Gobble-de-gook??
--
Daniel
Blueshirt wrote on 12/11/24 11:19 am:
Your Name wrote:
On 2024-11-11 16:17:54 +0000, Blueshirt said:
Your Name wrote:
The gender-swapping / ethnicity-swapping nonsense was only
fully "established" relatively recently and explicity so
that the show's makers could increase the Politically
Correct quota tickboxing. Before that there was at best
only vague hints or joking lines of dialogue.
True, but we do live in a world where, rightly or wrongly,
people can, and do, change their gender. So the BBC might
have decided they wanted their TV shows to represent the
world that people live in today.
The entertainment studios have been forced by Politically
Corerct idiots to have quotas of women, non-white people, and
disabled people in their shows. It's simply a lot cheaper and
easier for them to simply swap an existing white male
character than to actually be creative and make NEW shows and
characters. :-(
Wait until Jane Bond hits the screens one day in the future...
Copywrite Daniel70 And, come to think of it, 'M' changed sex!!
For a fictional TV show about an alien time-traveller than
can already change their body, face, hair (etc.)
Then why hasn't there ever been a version of the Doctor as a
blue blob creature, or flying squirrel character, or a stick
insect, ... or even as a Dalek??
Well, we did get a look at a Time-Lord choosing different
species when Romana was regenerating at the beginning of
"Destiny of the Daleks' ... before she settled on her Princess > Astra >face/body. So never say never, it could well happen again.
It'll be more down to the cost of the special FX required for
the Doctor to be non-humanoid more than anything else though.
Hmm!! New theory!! .... You know how The TARDIS changes peoples speech
so it always seems the characters are speaking ENGLISH??
Well, maybe, all along 'The Doctor' looks like 'The Blob' but The TARDIS >changes everyone's apparence so all the characters appear acceptable to
The VIEWER (of which ever RACE they are)!!
You read that here, FIRST!! ;-P
--
Daniel
In article <vgu9ok$18l03$1@dont-email.me>,
Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:
On 2024-11-12 00:19:43 +0000, Blueshirt said:
Wait until Jane Bond hits the screens one day in the
future...
As long as it is a new character, then there's no problem.
The problem is when they hijack an existing character for
idiotic gender/ethnicity-swapping.
Bond is dead.
In article <xn0ot7m3tbey82o007@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
And now that RTD 2 is around ...
RTD was the saviour remember? When Chris Chibnall was being
pilloried here by you, you were also welcoming the return of
RTD... will you ever be happy?
All he has to do is retcon the Timeless Child
and not give into Disney's absurd demands.
You could become a Star Trek fan [again] and relocate to one
of their newsgroups if you'd prefer a change of scenery...
No!
The Doctor wrote on 12/11/24 11:19 am:
Here is a counter to your NotKnow lie:
[Possibly dodgy link snipped]
Quote
"This badge was issued to Dave Shariff Yadallee Mr. on August
29, 2024 Expires on August 29, 2027"
End Quote
How does that refute Blueshirt's claims, Gobble-de-gook??
Blueshirt wrote on 12/11/24 11:29 am:
<Snip>
I refuse to watch a ton of stuff on the TV that I know I
won't like. (S2 of Rings of Power being the latest example.)
Why do Doctor Who fans persevere with watching Doctor Who
and continue bleating about it? You'll achieve just as much
in life by going outside, shaking your fist at the sky and
screaming "Down with the modern world"!
Was the line from the film something like "I'm mad as hell and
I'm not going to take it anymore"??
(NOTE: 'something like' as, apparently, this is a widely
accepted MIS-QUOTE!!)
In article <vgvct1$1ica5$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 12/11/24 11:19 am:
"This badge was issued to Dave Shariff Yadallee Mr. on
August 29, 2024 Expires on August 29, 2027"
How does that refute Blueshirt's claims, Gobble-de-gook??
It shows that BS knows nothing.
Daniel70 wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 12/11/24 11:19 am:
Here is a counter to your NotKnow lie:Quote
[Possibly dodgy link snipped]
"This badge was issued to Dave Shariff Yadallee Mr. on August
29, 2024 Expires on August 29, 2027"
End Quote
How does that refute Blueshirt's claims, Gobble-de-gook??
<face palm> Not claims... spelling errors!!!
Fat fingers are a terrible ailment to have for typing on small
keys. Although OTOH, the missus never complains about them...
The Doctor wrote:
In article <vgvct1$1ica5$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 12/11/24 11:19 am:
"This badge was issued to Dave Shariff Yadallee Mr. on
August 29, 2024 Expires on August 29, 2027"
How does that refute Blueshirt's claims, Gobble-de-gook??
It shows that BS knows nothing.
They give out certificates for that they do?
Don't let Mrs Blueshirt know that...
The True Doctor wrote:
On 11/11/2024 15:54, Blueshirt wrote:
Of course not, as Jodie Whittaker was cast as a female
Doctor, which was a big no-no to some fans. It also
disproves the argument put forth above by your 'buddy' that
you gave Jodie a chance. Some people did, some people
didn't. Your posts here made it quite clear at the time
which position you took though. You were never going to
accept a female Doctor full stop.
And all you've done since then is to bleat about her era
being retconned twenty times a week here like a broken
record...
There's nothing wrong with disapproving of a male character
being gender swapped in order to satisfy and bunch of deranged
woke activist retards who totally hate the show and everything
it stands for and out of spite want to destroy it for everyone
that loved it.
From what I see the only people that seem to hate the show are
the self-entitled fans that think the show is about what they
want it to be. Then throw their toys out of the pram when it's
not. The biggest enemy of Doctor Who has ALWAYS been its fans.
If you don't like Doctor Who, that's fine. Don't watch it then!
It's not hard to avoid a television show that you don't like.
I refuse to watch a ton of stuff on the TV that I know I won't
like. (S2 of Rings of Power being the latest example.) Why do
Doctor Who fans persevere with watching Doctor Who and continue
bleating about it? You'll achieve just as much in life by going
outside, shaking your fist at the sky and screaming "Down with
the modern world"!
The True Doctor wrote on 12/11/24 6:29 am:
On 11/11/2024 09:46, Daniel70 wrote:So no responce to my second situation/question??
The True Doctor wrote on 11/11/24 7:08 am:
On 10/11/2024 12:29, Blueshirt wrote:
<Snip>
Coming from somebody who was also posting here on RADW against
a female Doctor from day one (i.e. the day of and after Jodie
Whittaker's casting.) I don't know how you can seriously claim
you gave her a chance. The evidence proves otherwise.
Of course he gave her a chance. He watched her first episode just
like over 10 million other people including myself. Giving someone a
chance don't mean you have to support and believe in them from the
very start. In fact it means the exact opposite, not supporting or
believing in them but letting them try to persuade you otherwise.
When you watched the first 'DoctorDavid' episode, were you thinking
"This is going to be the best thing since sliced bread" ..... or were
you thinking "This could be all right, I'll give it a go and see what
happens??"
The latter.
Same Situation .... this time for 'JodieDoctor'??
Still lokking forward to Trump arresting paedophiles
and Deep State Actors.
Rose Noble has a very strange line in The Star Beast,
“Something a male-presenting Time Lord will never understand.”
Why “male-presenting” instead of just “male”? Could it be that male-presenting Time Lords aren’t really male after all? That
they’re all in fact hermaphrodites with fully functional wombs
capable of bearing a child? In which case, no need to worry
about pregnant regenerations.
Better to just stick with the Looms instead. Much safer.
On 12/11/2024 00:29, Blueshirt wrote:
I refuse to watch a ton of stuff on the TV that I know I
won't like. (S2 of Rings of Power being the latest example.)
Why do Doctor Who fans persevere with watching Doctor Who
and continue bleating about it? You'll achieve just as much
in life by going outside, shaking your fist at the sky and
screaming "Down with the modern world"!
No I won't. What I will do is stop buying the merchandise
(which I have already done) and stop others from doing so by
showing how fans have been deliberately attacked, alienated
and disenfranchise in order to serve a bunch of totally
degenerate woke activists who have always hated Doctor Who and
want it made only for them and not for the people who actually
watch it and were the ones responsible for its popularity.
Doctor Who is a MALE orientated show representing male values,
the hero's journey, masculinity, logic, reason, and scientific
thinking and methodology triumphing over female sentiment and
emotion, and therefore appeals only to men and boys and people
who are already scientifically orientated. It's not there for
a bunch of man hating fourth wave lesbian feminist activist
bigots. Virtually everything on television today is made
exclusively for non-aspirational women, and it is totally
mind-numbing for those with intelligence. It's time to make
something for men and other people with intelligence again.
On 12/11/2024 00:29, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 11/11/2024 15:54, Blueshirt wrote:
Of course not, as Jodie Whittaker was cast as a female
Doctor, which was a big no-no to some fans. It also
disproves the argument put forth above by your 'buddy' that
you gave Jodie a chance. Some people did, some people
didn't. Your posts here made it quite clear at the time
which position you took though. You were never going to
accept a female Doctor full stop.
And all you've done since then is to bleat about her era
being retconned twenty times a week here like a broken
record...
There's nothing wrong with disapproving of a male character
being gender swapped in order to satisfy and bunch of deranged
woke activist retards who totally hate the show and everything
it stands for and out of spite want to destroy it for everyone
that loved it.
From what I see the only people that seem to hate the show are
the self-entitled fans that think the show is about what they
want it to be. Then throw their toys out of the pram when it's
Doctor Who ended in 2017. People who spent hundreds or thousands of
pounds on the show and its merchandise are entitled to be thanked,
respected, and not insulted.
not. The biggest enemy of Doctor Who has ALWAYS been its fans.
The biggest enemy of Doctor Who has ALWAYS been BAD WRITING and
insulting and attacking its fans.
If you don't like Doctor Who, that's fine. Don't watch it then!
It's not hard to avoid a television show that you don't like.
Doctor Who ended in 2017. There's nothing to watch.
I refuse to watch a ton of stuff on the TV that I know I won't
like. (S2 of Rings of Power being the latest example.) Why do
Doctor Who fans persevere with watching Doctor Who and continue
bleating about it? You'll achieve just as much in life by going
outside, shaking your fist at the sky and screaming "Down with
the modern world"!
No I won't. What I will do is stop buying the merchandise (which I have >already done) and stop others from doing so by showing how fans have
been deliberately attacked, alienated and disenfranchise in order to
serve a bunch of totally degenerate woke activists who have always hated >Doctor Who and want it made only for them and not for the people who
actually watch it and were the ones responsible for its popularity.
Doctor Who is a MALE orientated show representing male values, the
hero's journey, masculinity, logic, reason, and scientific thinking and >methodology triumphing over female sentiment and emotion, and therefore >appeals only to men and boys and people who are already scientifically >orientated. It's not there for a bunch of man hating fourth wave lesbian >feminist activist bigots. Virtually everything on television today is
made exclusively for non-aspirational women, and it is totally
mind-numbing for those with intelligence. It's time to make something
for men and other people with intelligence again.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." -William Shatner
On 12/11/2024 11:26, Daniel70 wrote:
The True Doctor wrote on 12/11/24 6:29 am:
On 11/11/2024 09:46, Daniel70 wrote:So no responce to my second situation/question??
The True Doctor wrote on 11/11/24 7:08 am:
On 10/11/2024 12:29, Blueshirt wrote:
<Snip>
Coming from somebody who was also posting here on RADW against
a female Doctor from day one (i.e. the day of and after Jodie
Whittaker's casting.) I don't know how you can seriously claim
you gave her a chance. The evidence proves otherwise.
Of course he gave her a chance. He watched her first episode just
like over 10 million other people including myself. Giving someone a >>>>> chance don't mean you have to support and believe in them from the
very start. In fact it means the exact opposite, not supporting or
believing in them but letting them try to persuade you otherwise.
When you watched the first 'DoctorDavid' episode, were you thinking
"This is going to be the best thing since sliced bread" ..... or were
you thinking "This could be all right, I'll give it a go and see what
happens??"
The latter.
Same Situation .... this time for 'JodieDoctor'??
You didn't provide any choice. From the start with its failure to play
the opening theme music and its depiction of a weak male character with >dyspraxia I thought it going to be crap, and so it was, especially when >Whittaker appeared.
The majority of viewers though exactly the same way as by the end of the >first series the viewership had more than halved and by the end of >Whittaker's run she had lost 3/4 of the viewers.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." -William Shatner
The True Doctor wrote:
On 12/11/2024 00:29, Blueshirt wrote:
I refuse to watch a ton of stuff on the TV that I know I
won't like. (S2 of Rings of Power being the latest example.)
Why do Doctor Who fans persevere with watching Doctor Who
and continue bleating about it? You'll achieve just as much
in life by going outside, shaking your fist at the sky and
screaming "Down with the modern world"!
No I won't. What I will do is stop buying the merchandise
(which I have already done) and stop others from doing so by
showing how fans have been deliberately attacked, alienated
and disenfranchise in order to serve a bunch of totally
degenerate woke activists who have always hated Doctor Who and
want it made only for them and not for the people who actually
watch it and were the ones responsible for its popularity.
Doctor Who is a MALE orientated show representing male values,
the hero's journey, masculinity, logic, reason, and scientific
thinking and methodology triumphing over female sentiment and
emotion, and therefore appeals only to men and boys and people
who are already scientifically orientated. It's not there for
a bunch of man hating fourth wave lesbian feminist activist
bigots. Virtually everything on television today is made
exclusively for non-aspirational women, and it is totally
mind-numbing for those with intelligence. It's time to make
something for men and other people with intelligence again.
You say is, I say was... although with Ncuti Gatwa as the
current Doctor you have your male orientated show back!
For me, it makes sense for television shows to change and adapt
if they are going to be around for sixty years. I see the
changes in Doctor Who as the production team trying to modernise
the show... and there have been a variety of big changes to the
show's lore over the many years as producers and script editors
have brought their own ideas on-board. Some good, some not so
good. (That would be a whole discussion by itself!)
I accept that not every change is great, (I hated those humpback
Dalek things that Moffat brought in) but I do understand why the
show's Executive Producers want "Doctor Who" to evolve and right
or wrong they all have their own way of doing that... or, trying
to anyway.
You - and others - don't like a lot of the recent changes, I get
that, but you do still have the choice to switch off or change
the channel. Which I would assume is what most sensible people
do when they are watching stuff on the TV that irritates them.
solar penguin wrote:
Rose Noble has a very strange line in The Star Beast,
“Something a male-presenting Time Lord will never understand.”
Why “male-presenting” instead of just “male”? Could it be that
male-presenting Time Lords aren’t really male after all? That
they’re all in fact hermaphrodites with fully functional wombs
capable of bearing a child? In which case, no need to worry
about pregnant regenerations.
Well, there's something to think about! :-)
Better to just stick with the Looms instead. Much safer.
NO, NOT THE LOOMS!!!
The True loon forgot the Looms:
On 11/11/2024 16:17, Blueshirt wrote:
For a fictional TV show about an alien time-traveller than can
already change their body, face, hair (etc.) I didn't have a
problem with Missy as a female Master. I actually thought
It was totally unbelievable. What happens to the unborn child if she
gets pregnant and is forced to regenerate into a man again? It's totally
stupid to go pandering to a minority of woke degenerates.
Can Gallifreyans even get pregnant in the first place? According to
the NAs they reproduce on genetic Looms.
OTOH if you don’t want the novels as canon, there’s another
possibility. But you’re not going to like it.
I’m serious. You’re really, really not going to like it.
This is your last warning. Look away now if you value what peace of
mind you still have.
OK. Here we go. Don’t say you weren’t warned!
Rose Noble has a very strange line in The Star Beast, “Something a >male-presenting Time Lord will never understand.”
Why “male-presenting” instead of just “male”? Could it be that >male-presenting Time Lords aren’t really male after all? That they’re
all in fact hermaphrodites with fully functional wombs capable of
bearing a child? In which case, no need to worry about pregnant >regenerations.
See, I told you that you weren’t going to like it.
Better to just stick with the Looms instead. Much safer.
--
solar penguin
The True Doctor wrote:
On 11/11/2024 16:17, Blueshirt wrote:
For a fictional TV show about an alien time-traveller than can
already change their body, face, hair (etc.) I didn't have a
problem with Missy as a female Master. I actually thought
It was totally unbelievable. What happens to the unborn child if she
gets pregnant and is forced to regenerate into a man again? It's totally
stupid to go pandering to a minority of woke degenerates.
Can Gallifreyans even get pregnant in the first place? According to
the NAs they reproduce on genetic Looms.
OTOH if you don’t want the novels as canon, there’s another
possibility. But you’re not going to like it.
I’m serious. You’re really, really not going to like it.
This is your last warning. Look away now if you value what peace of
mind you still have.
OK. Here we go. Don’t say you weren’t warned!
Rose Noble has a very strange line in The Star Beast, “Something a male-presenting Time Lord will never understand.”
Why “male-presenting” instead of just “male”? Could it be that
male-presenting Time Lords aren’t really male after all? That they’re
all in fact hermaphrodites with fully functional wombs capable of
bearing a child? In which case, no need to worry about pregnant regenerations.
See, I told you that you weren’t going to like it.
Better to just stick with the Looms instead. Much safer.
The Doctor wrote:
Still lokking forward to Trump arresting paedophiles
and Deep State Actors.
He'd want to start with the churches...
You wouldn't need to look too far there for some deep state
activity and cover-ups.
On 12/11/2024 17:49, solar imbecile wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 11/11/2024 16:17, Blueshirt wrote:
For a fictional TV show about an alien time-traveller than can
already change their body, face, hair (etc.) I didn't have a
problem with Missy as a female Master. I actually thought
It was totally unbelievable. What happens to the unborn child if she
gets pregnant and is forced to regenerate into a man again? It's totally >>> stupid to go pandering to a minority of woke degenerates.
Can Gallifreyans even get pregnant in the first place? According to
the NAs they reproduce on genetic Looms.
Irrelevant. The Doctor is still a male character looms or no looms.
Besides which at the end of Lungbarrow were able to produce via normal
sexual intercourse. So the original question still applies.
OTOH if you don’t want the novels as canon, there’s another
possibility. But you’re not going to like it.
I’m serious. You’re really, really not going to like it.
This is your last warning. Look away now if you value what peace of
mind you still have.
OK. Here we go. Don’t say you weren’t warned!
Rose Noble has a very strange line in The Star Beast, “Something a
male-presenting Time Lord will never understand.”
You mean Jason Noble.
Why “male-presenting” instead of just “male”? Could it be that
It means a man who acts and behaves like a man, and why shouldn't he? A >totally degenerate sexist and bigoted comment coming from the far left
which drove even more viewers away and gained no sympathy for the
character of its cause.
male-presenting Time Lords aren’t really male after all? That they’re
all in fact hermaphrodites with fully functional wombs capable of
bearing a child? In which case, no need to worry about pregnant
regenerations.
How does the Doctor pee then?
See, I told you that you weren’t going to like it.
Better to just stick with the Looms instead. Much safer.
As I said earlier, the Doctor is still a male character. The way he
thinks, acts, behaves, and deals with other people, problems and
situations is the way a man would think, act, and behave, and deal with
other people, problems and situations.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." -William Shatner
In article <xn0otgntsktvi8n000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Disney is is chaos!
How about partners like CBC, AustBC, and TVNZ ?
IIRC the BBC had those networks as partners for overseas
distribution of their popular television programmes. At a
guess, I'd say the Disney Corporation gave the BBC more
money than those other partners could.
I have my doubts given the problem Disney have.
In article <xn0otgnjlktgsfq00b@news.eternal-september.org>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Don't be sad! Ban Idlehands!
RADW is a free space for all. If you don't want to read posts
from certain people, killfile them...
Or be your own news server!
The Doctor wrote:
In article <vhf3fn$16dln$2@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
Idlehands wrote on 18/11/24 3:35 pm:
Poor binky, "runs" and ISP but has no clue how to thread
messages or follow a thread.
I answered his questions (through your post) but he can't
see it what a sad excuse for a Sys Admin.
Lying Idlehands lies again!
Yes, how sad!!
Don't be sad! Ban Idlehands!
RADW is a free space for all. If you don't want to read posts
from certain people, killfile them...
Daniel70 wrote:
Blueshirt wrote on 18/11/24 8:21 am:
But aren't the cops always bumbling ("Agatha Raisin", "Father
I could never get in to "Agatha Raisin", I found it too
comedic at times... especially the bumbling police man.
Ashley Jensen is hot though...
Brown", "Shakespeare & Hathaway", "Harry Wild", "Miss Scarlet
and The Duke" .... Do you get the idea I watch a few British
'Police' series??) when they are just the 'outsiders', unlike
say, 'The Bill' (yes, it's been a while) and 'Vera'!!
Nah, there's bumbling to show how clever the 'detective' is and
then there's BUMBLING, as in played for laughs!
I'll take Miss Marple over these modern day sleuths any day...
Daniel70 wrote:
Blueshirt wrote:
Happy Christmas!
A TAD early, aren't you, Blueshirt?? (Yes, I can be a Grinch
at times.)
Tell that to the shops...
Blueshirt wrote on 19/11/24 1:18 am:
Daniel70 wrote:I think I've seen three different versions of "Miss Marple" over the
Blueshirt wrote on 18/11/24 8:21 am:
But aren't the cops always bumbling ("Agatha Raisin", "Father
I could never get in to "Agatha Raisin", I found it too
comedic at times... especially the bumbling police man.
Ashley Jensen is hot though...
Brown", "Shakespeare & Hathaway", "Harry Wild", "Miss Scarlet
and The Duke" .... Do you get the idea I watch a few British
'Police' series??) when they are just the 'outsiders', unlike
say, 'The Bill' (yes, it's been a while) and 'Vera'!!
Nah, there's bumbling to show how clever the 'detective' is and
then there's BUMBLING, as in played for laughs!
I'll take Miss Marple over these modern day sleuths any day...
years .... or, maybe, the actress just kept having extreme surgery over
time.
In article <xn0otgntsktvi8n000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0otgmviksn3nl006@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
"2017"?? How DARE you, Aggy?? Surely everyone knows "Doctor
Who" finished in 1989 .... or 1996 .... or 2017 ..... or
2023.... or is ongoing!!
It looks like it finished for you when the BBC done the deal
with Disney! :-)
Disney is is chaos!
How about partners like CBC, AustBC, and TVNZ ?
IIRC the BBC had those networks as partners for overseas
distribution of their popular television programmes. At a guess,
I'd say the Disney Corporation gave the BBC more money than
those other partners could.
I have my doubts given the problem Disney have.
Daniel70 wrote:
The True Doctor wrote on 17/11/24 11:00 am:
On 12/11/2024 01:00, Blueshirt wrote:
This is RADW, show some positivity for our favourite TV
show or take your business elsewhere...
How can people be positive when their favourite show ended
in 2017 and there's no sight of it being brought back the
way it was?
"2017"?? How DARE you, Aggy?? Surely everyone knows "Doctor
Who" finished in 1989 .... or 1996 .... or 2017 ..... or 2023
.... or is ongoing!!
It looks like it finished for you when the BBC done the deal
with Disney! :-)
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The True Doctor wrote on 17/11/24 11:00 am:
On 12/11/2024 01:00, Blueshirt wrote:"2017"?? How DARE you, Aggy?? Surely everyone knows "Doctor Who"
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0ot7kv5bdapjl001@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Your Name wrote:
"Good and enjoyable" in Doctor Who stopped a LONG time ago.
:-p
Nah, when it's good it's good... when it's bad, it can be
bad. But I do try to be a half-full type of guy. I always
hope for the best.
Roll on Christmas Day.
What are you drinking?
This is RADW, show some positivity for our favourite TV show or
take your business elsewhere...
How can people be positive when their favourite show ended in 2017 and
there's no sight of it being brought back the way it was?
finished in 1989 .... or 1996 .... or 2017 ..... or 2023 .... or is
ongoing!!
1966! They changed the lead character actor into a much younger man with
the flimsy excuse of “renewal”! I can’t believe it! The show is over, everything since Hartnell was ignominiously let go is FAKE! Doctor Who?
More like Doctor HOW! I haven’t watched a single episode since. (Review of “Inferno” to follow, but I warn you, 0/10! No Hartnell, no show!)
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
Blueshirt wrote on 19/11/24 1:18 am:
I'll take Miss Marple over these modern day sleuths any
day...
I think I've seen three different versions of "Miss Marple"
over the years .... or, maybe, the actress just kept having
extreme surgery over time.
Perhaps she regenerated - woo woo, wooooh-wooh!
Our ABC has been re-playing NewWho, one episode, Monday to
Friday, for the last six months or so. As I type, DoctorPeter
in "The Girl who Died" where we were introduced to Ashildr.
(Look out ... The Doctor is just reveresing the Polarity of
The Neutron Flow!!)
Tomorrow, appropriately, we have "The Woman who Lived" where
Ashildr has turned into a HighwayWoman!!
And, given the use of a PVR Hard Drive, a USB Drive, and a
Laptop (this one) with a DVD Burner, I should be right for
life ....
or until NEW 'Doctor Who' gets back onto Free-to-Air
T.V.!! ;-)
The Last Doctor wrote on 19/11/24 6:11 pm:
1966! They changed the lead character actor into a much
younger man with the flimsy excuse of “renewal”! I can’t
believe it! The show is over, everything since Hartnell was
ignominiously let go is FAKE! Doctor Who? More like Doctor
HOW! I haven’t watched a single episode since. (Review of
“Inferno” to follow, but I warn you, 0/10! No Hartnell, no
show!)
AHH!! NOOOOOO!! It seems The Last Doctor might have been
dragged over to The Dark Side!! ;-P
Blueshirt wrote on 19/11/24 1:18 am:
I'll take Miss Marple over these modern day sleuths any
day...
I think I've seen three different versions of "Miss Marple"
over the years .... or, maybe, the actress just kept having
extreme surgery over time.
The Last Doctor wrote on 19/11/24 6:11 pm:
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:AHH!! NOOOOOO!! It seems The Last Doctor might have been dragged over to
The True Doctor wrote on 17/11/24 11:00 am:
On 12/11/2024 01:00, Blueshirt wrote:"2017"?? How DARE you, Aggy?? Surely everyone knows "Doctor Who"
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0ot7kv5bdapjl001@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Your Name wrote:
"Good and enjoyable" in Doctor Who stopped a LONG time ago.
:-p
Nah, when it's good it's good... when it's bad, it can be
bad. But I do try to be a half-full type of guy. I always
hope for the best.
Roll on Christmas Day.
What are you drinking?
This is RADW, show some positivity for our favourite TV show or
take your business elsewhere...
How can people be positive when their favourite show ended in 2017 and >>>> there's no sight of it being brought back the way it was?
finished in 1989 .... or 1996 .... or 2017 ..... or 2023 .... or is
ongoing!!
1966! They changed the lead character actor into a much younger man with
the flimsy excuse of “renewal”! I can’t believe it! The show is over, >> everything since Hartnell was ignominiously let go is FAKE! Doctor Who?
More like Doctor HOW! I haven’t watched a single episode since. (Review of >> “Inferno” to follow, but I warn you, 0/10! No Hartnell, no show!)
The Dark Side!! ;-P
And, Mike, I've been meaning to ask ..... Your NYM "The Last Doctor"
.... are you The Last Doctor there will EVER be .... or are you The Last Doctor before the current Doctor (whomever that may be!!)??
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
Blueshirt wrote on 19/11/24 1:18 am:
Daniel70 wrote:I think I've seen three different versions of "Miss Marple" over the
Blueshirt wrote on 18/11/24 8:21 am:
But aren't the cops always bumbling ("Agatha Raisin", "Father
I could never get in to "Agatha Raisin", I found it too
comedic at times... especially the bumbling police man.
Ashley Jensen is hot though...
Brown", "Shakespeare & Hathaway", "Harry Wild", "Miss Scarlet
and The Duke" .... Do you get the idea I watch a few British
'Police' series??) when they are just the 'outsiders', unlike
say, 'The Bill' (yes, it's been a while) and 'Vera'!!
Nah, there's bumbling to show how clever the 'detective' is and
then there's BUMBLING, as in played for laughs!
I'll take Miss Marple over these modern day sleuths any day...
years .... or, maybe, the actress just kept having extreme surgery over
time.
Perhaps she regenerated - woo woo, wooooh-wooh!
The Last Doctor wrote on 19/11/24 10:13 pm:
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:Ah!! Is this an attempt to have a "Doctor Who" connection?? i.e. Obj
Blueshirt wrote on 19/11/24 1:18 am:
Daniel70 wrote:I think I've seen three different versions of "Miss Marple" over the
Blueshirt wrote on 18/11/24 8:21 am:
But aren't the cops always bumbling ("Agatha Raisin", "Father
I could never get in to "Agatha Raisin", I found it too
comedic at times... especially the bumbling police man.
Ashley Jensen is hot though...
Brown", "Shakespeare & Hathaway", "Harry Wild", "Miss Scarlet
and The Duke" .... Do you get the idea I watch a few British
'Police' series??) when they are just the 'outsiders', unlike
say, 'The Bill' (yes, it's been a while) and 'Vera'!!
Nah, there's bumbling to show how clever the 'detective' is and
then there's BUMBLING, as in played for laughs!
I'll take Miss Marple over these modern day sleuths any day...
years .... or, maybe, the actress just kept having extreme surgery over
time.
Perhaps she regenerated - woo woo, wooooh-wooh!
DrWho!!
Daniel70 wrote:
Blueshirt wrote on 19/11/24 1:18 am:
I think I've seen three different versions of "Miss Marple"
I'll take Miss Marple over these modern day sleuths any
day...
over the years .... or, maybe, the actress just kept having
extreme surgery over time.
Only three?!
Blueshirt wrote on 19/11/24 2:01 am:
The Doctor wrote:He HAS .... but still reply to him through anybody else that replies to Idlehands. How deep has Idlehands gotten into Gobble-de-gooks mind??
In article <vhf3fn$16dln$2@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
Idlehands wrote on 18/11/24 3:35 pm:
Poor binky, "runs" and ISP but has no clue how to thread
messages or follow a thread.
I answered his questions (through your post) but he can't
see it what a sad excuse for a Sys Admin.
Lying Idlehands lies again!
Yes, how sad!!
Don't be sad! Ban Idlehands!
RADW is a free space for all. If you don't want to read posts
from certain people, killfile them...
Daniel70 wrote:
Our ABC has been re-playing NewWho, one episode, Monday to
Friday, for the last six months or so. As I type, DoctorPeter
in "The Girl who Died" where we were introduced to Ashildr.
(Look out ... The Doctor is just reveresing the Polarity of
The Neutron Flow!!)
Tomorrow, appropriately, we have "The Woman who Lived" where
Ashildr has turned into a HighwayWoman!!
How exciting!
And, given the use of a PVR Hard Drive, a USB Drive, and a
Laptop (this one) with a DVD Burner, I should be right for
life ....
You can use a PVR, a laptop and a DVD burner, but you can't use
a VPN?!
or until NEW 'Doctor Who' gets back onto Free-to-Air
T.V.!! ;-)
I wouldn't be holding your breath on that one if I was you.
Don't worry, come Christmas Day you'll have loads of exciting
reviews to read from the rest of us here of the latest new
Doctor Who episode, whilst you watch ancient repeats on ABC.
Joy to the world indeed!
:-)
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0otgnjlktgsfq00b@news.eternal-september.org>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Don't be sad! Ban Idlehands!
RADW is a free space for all. If you don't want to read posts
from certain people, killfile them...
Or be your own news server!
I am not my own news server but I can still filter out people
and/or posts that I don't want to see.
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0otgntsktvi8n000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Disney is is chaos!
How about partners like CBC, AustBC, and TVNZ ?
IIRC the BBC had those networks as partners for overseas
distribution of their popular television programmes. At a
guess, I'd say the Disney Corporation gave the BBC more
money than those other partners could.
I have my doubts given the problem Disney have.
Dave, 'problem' is a relative term at the level Disney operate
at. The Disney Corporation are not going bankrupt or out of
business any time soon, regardless of your doubts. Everyone
knows the only reason the BBC did a partnership with Disney for
the Doctor Who streaming rights was the $$. The BBC are an
ailing organisation themselves, they wouldn't get that sort of
financial investment from anyone else. Doctor Who is too niche.
If the deal with Disney for Doctor Who does not get renewed
after S2/S15 I don't see any of the other big streaming media
companies stumping up any cash for the show.
Blueshirt wrote on 19/11/24 2:01 am:
The Doctor wrote:He HAS .... but still reply to him through anybody else that replies to >Idlehands. How deep has Idlehands gotten into Gobble-de-gooks mind??
In article <vhf3fn$16dln$2@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
Idlehands wrote on 18/11/24 3:35 pm:
Poor binky, "runs" and ISP but has no clue how to thread
messages or follow a thread.
I answered his questions (through your post) but he can't
see it what a sad excuse for a Sys Admin.
Lying Idlehands lies again!
Yes, how sad!!
Don't be sad! Ban Idlehands!
RADW is a free space for all. If you don't want to read posts
from certain people, killfile them...
--
Daniel
Blueshirt wrote on 19/11/24 1:37 am:
Daniel70 wrote:Yeap. I can relate .... When I was in The Australian Army, more often
Blueshirt wrote:
Happy Christmas!
A TAD early, aren't you, Blueshirt?? (Yes, I can be a Grinch
at times.)
Tell that to the shops...
than not the period from Melbourne Cup Day (first Tuesday in November)
marked the start of "Silly Season" with various Troop, Company, Regiment
and Mess Dinners (i.e. Christmas piss-ups) having to occur.
The shops have only just started the extended seasons.
--
Daniel
Blueshirt wrote on 19/11/24 1:18 am:
Daniel70 wrote:I think I've seen three different versions of "Miss Marple" over the
Blueshirt wrote on 18/11/24 8:21 am:
But aren't the cops always bumbling ("Agatha Raisin", "Father
I could never get in to "Agatha Raisin", I found it too
comedic at times... especially the bumbling police man.
Ashley Jensen is hot though...
Brown", "Shakespeare & Hathaway", "Harry Wild", "Miss Scarlet
and The Duke" .... Do you get the idea I watch a few British
'Police' series??) when they are just the 'outsiders', unlike
say, 'The Bill' (yes, it's been a while) and 'Vera'!!
Nah, there's bumbling to show how clever the 'detective' is and
then there's BUMBLING, as in played for laughs!
I'll take Miss Marple over these modern day sleuths any day...
years .... or, maybe, the actress just kept having extreme surgery over
time.
--
Daniel
Blueshirt wrote on 19/11/24 1:38 am:
Daniel70 wrote:*NEVER* !
The True Doctor wrote on 17/11/24 11:00 am:
On 12/11/2024 01:00, Blueshirt wrote:
This is RADW, show some positivity for our favourite TV
show or take your business elsewhere...
How can people be positive when their favourite show ended
in 2017 and there's no sight of it being brought back the
way it was?
"2017"?? How DARE you, Aggy?? Surely everyone knows "Doctor
Who" finished in 1989 .... or 1996 .... or 2017 ..... or 2023
.... or is ongoing!!
It looks like it finished for you when the BBC done the deal
with Disney! :-)
Our ABC has been re-playing NewWho, one episode, Monday to Friday, for
the last six months or so. As I type, DoctorPeter in "The Girl who Died" >where we were introduced to Ashildr.
(Look out ... The Doctor is just reveresing the Polarity of The Neutron >Flow!!)
Tomorrow, appropriately, we have "The Woman who Lived" where Ashildr has >turned into a HighwayWoman!!
And, given the use of a PVR Hard Drive, a USB Drive, and a Laptop (this
one) with a DVD Burner, I should be right for life .... or until NEW
'Doctor Who' gets back onto Free-to-Air T.V.!! ;-)
--
Daniel
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
Blueshirt wrote on 19/11/24 1:18 am:
Daniel70 wrote:I think I've seen three different versions of "Miss Marple" over the
Blueshirt wrote on 18/11/24 8:21 am:
But aren't the cops always bumbling ("Agatha Raisin", "Father
I could never get in to "Agatha Raisin", I found it too
comedic at times... especially the bumbling police man.
Ashley Jensen is hot though...
Brown", "Shakespeare & Hathaway", "Harry Wild", "Miss Scarlet
and The Duke" .... Do you get the idea I watch a few British
'Police' series??) when they are just the 'outsiders', unlike
say, 'The Bill' (yes, it's been a while) and 'Vera'!!
Nah, there's bumbling to show how clever the 'detective' is and
then there's BUMBLING, as in played for laughs!
I'll take Miss Marple over these modern day sleuths any day...
years .... or, maybe, the actress just kept having extreme surgery over
time.
Perhaps she regenerated - woo woo, wooooh-wooh!
--
“Most of the Universe is knackered, babes.” - The Doctor
The Last Doctor wrote on 19/11/24 6:11 pm:
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:AHH!! NOOOOOO!! It seems The Last Doctor might have been dragged over to
The True Doctor wrote on 17/11/24 11:00 am:
On 12/11/2024 01:00, Blueshirt wrote:"2017"?? How DARE you, Aggy?? Surely everyone knows "Doctor Who"
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0ot7kv5bdapjl001@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Your Name wrote:
"Good and enjoyable" in Doctor Who stopped a LONG time ago.
:-p
Nah, when it's good it's good... when it's bad, it can be
bad. But I do try to be a half-full type of guy. I always
hope for the best.
Roll on Christmas Day.
What are you drinking?
This is RADW, show some positivity for our favourite TV show or
take your business elsewhere...
How can people be positive when their favourite show ended in 2017 and >>>> there's no sight of it being brought back the way it was?
finished in 1989 .... or 1996 .... or 2017 ..... or 2023 .... or is
ongoing!!
1966! They changed the lead character actor into a much younger man with
the flimsy excuse of “renewal”! I can’t believe it! The show is over, >> everything since Hartnell was ignominiously let go is FAKE! Doctor Who?
More like Doctor HOW! I haven’t watched a single episode since. (Review of >> “Inferno” to follow, but I warn you, 0/10! No Hartnell, no show!)
The Dark Side!! ;-P
And, Mike, I've been meaning to ask ..... Your NYM "The Last Doctor"
.... are you The Last Doctor there will EVER be .... or are you The Last >Doctor before the current Doctor (whomever that may be!!)??
--
Daniel
Daniel70 wrote:
Blueshirt wrote on 19/11/24 1:18 am:
I think I've seen three different versions of "Miss Marple"
I'll take Miss Marple over these modern day sleuths any
day...
over the years .... or, maybe, the actress just kept having
extreme surgery over time.
Only three?!
The Last Doctor wrote:
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
Blueshirt wrote on 19/11/24 1:18 am:
I'll take Miss Marple over these modern day sleuths any
day...
I think I've seen three different versions of "Miss Marple"
over the years .... or, maybe, the actress just kept having
extreme surgery over time.
Perhaps she regenerated - woo woo, wooooh-wooh!
:-)
You're on a roll today Mike!
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The Last Doctor wrote on 19/11/24 6:11 pm:
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:AHH!! NOOOOOO!! It seems The Last Doctor might have been dragged over to
The True Doctor wrote on 17/11/24 11:00 am:
On 12/11/2024 01:00, Blueshirt wrote:"2017"?? How DARE you, Aggy?? Surely everyone knows "Doctor Who"
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0ot7kv5bdapjl001@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Your Name wrote:
"Good and enjoyable" in Doctor Who stopped a LONG time ago.
:-p
Nah, when it's good it's good... when it's bad, it can be
bad. But I do try to be a half-full type of guy. I always
hope for the best.
Roll on Christmas Day.
What are you drinking?
This is RADW, show some positivity for our favourite TV show or
take your business elsewhere...
How can people be positive when their favourite show ended in 2017 and >>>>> there's no sight of it being brought back the way it was?
finished in 1989 .... or 1996 .... or 2017 ..... or 2023 .... or is
ongoing!!
1966! They changed the lead character actor into a much younger man with >>> the flimsy excuse of “renewal”! I can’t believe it! The show is over, >>> everything since Hartnell was ignominiously let go is FAKE! Doctor Who?
More like Doctor HOW! I haven’t watched a single episode since. (Review of
“Inferno” to follow, but I warn you, 0/10! No Hartnell, no show!)
The Dark Side!! ;-P
And, Mike, I've been meaning to ask ..... Your NYM "The Last Doctor"
.... are you The Last Doctor there will EVER be .... or are you The Last
Doctor before the current Doctor (whomever that may be!!)??
Neither. I’m a specialist repairer of cobblers’ tools. Not much call for >it, if I’m honest.
--
“Most of the Universe is knackered, babes.” - The Doctor
The Last Doctor wrote on 19/11/24 10:13 pm:
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:Ah!! Is this an attempt to have a "Doctor Who" connection?? i.e. Obj DrWho!! >--
Blueshirt wrote on 19/11/24 1:18 am:
Daniel70 wrote:I think I've seen three different versions of "Miss Marple" over the
Blueshirt wrote on 18/11/24 8:21 am:
But aren't the cops always bumbling ("Agatha Raisin", "Father
I could never get in to "Agatha Raisin", I found it too
comedic at times... especially the bumbling police man.
Ashley Jensen is hot though...
Brown", "Shakespeare & Hathaway", "Harry Wild", "Miss Scarlet
and The Duke" .... Do you get the idea I watch a few British
'Police' series??) when they are just the 'outsiders', unlike
say, 'The Bill' (yes, it's been a while) and 'Vera'!!
Nah, there's bumbling to show how clever the 'detective' is and
then there's BUMBLING, as in played for laughs!
I'll take Miss Marple over these modern day sleuths any day...
years .... or, maybe, the actress just kept having extreme surgery over
time.
Perhaps she regenerated - woo woo, wooooh-wooh!
Daniel
Blueshirt wrote on 19/11/24 10:38 pm:
Daniel70 wrote:
Our ABC has been re-playing NewWho, one episode, Monday to
Friday, for the last six months or so. As I type, DoctorPeter
in "The Girl who Died" where we were introduced to Ashildr.
(Look out ... The Doctor is just reveresing the Polarity of
The Neutron Flow!!)
Tomorrow, appropriately, we have "The Woman who Lived" where
Ashildr has turned into a HighwayWoman!!
How exciting!
And, given the use of a PVR Hard Drive, a USB Drive, and a
Laptop (this one) with a DVD Burner, I should be right for
life ....
You can use a PVR, a laptop and a DVD burner, but you can't use
a VPN?!
I've used a PVR. I've used a Laptop. I've burnt CD/DVDs.
I've never used a VPN! Never had a need to.
or until NEW 'Doctor Who' gets back onto Free-to-Air
T.V.!! ;-)
I wouldn't be holding your breath on that one if I was you.
Surely, at THIS time of year, One can live in HOPE!!
Don't worry, come Christmas Day you'll have loads of exciting"exciting"!! Hopefully!!
reviews to read from the rest of us here of the latest new
Doctor Who episode, whilst you watch ancient repeats on ABC.
Joy to the world indeed!
:-)
--
Daniel
Blueshirt wrote on 19/11/24 10:32 pm:
Daniel70 wrote:
Blueshirt wrote on 19/11/24 1:18 am:
I'll take Miss Marple over these modern day sleuths any
day...
I think I've seen three different versions of "Miss Marple"
over the years .... or, maybe, the actress just kept having
extreme surgery over time.
Only three?!
That's enough, isn't it??
In article <xn0othuu93ca1ew000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0otgnjlktgsfq00b@news.eternal-september.org>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
RADW is a free space for all. If you don't want to read
posts from certain people, killfile them...
Or be your own news server!
I am not my own news server but I can still filter out people
and/or posts that I don't want to see.
Guess which is more powerful? [corrected]
Daniel70 wrote:
Blueshirt wrote on 19/11/24 10:32 pm:
Daniel70 wrote:That's enough, isn't it??
Blueshirt wrote on 19/11/24 1:18 am:
I think I've seen three different versions of "Miss Marple"
I'll take Miss Marple over these modern day sleuths any
day...
over the years .... or, maybe, the actress just kept having
extreme surgery over time.
Only three?!
You can never have enough Agatha Christie dramatisations...
Although I still prefer the Joan Hickson BBC produced version of
the Marple canon to the more recent ITV 'interpretations'.
In article <xn0othwi83ejpzk000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
Blueshirt wrote on 19/11/24 1:18 am:
I think I've seen three different versions of "Miss Marple"
I'll take Miss Marple over these modern day sleuths any
day...
over the years .... or, maybe, the actress just kept having
extreme surgery over time.
Only three?!
Maybe more.
The Doctor wrote:
In article <vhhqtp$1ptdj$4@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
Blueshirt wrote on 19/11/24 1:18 am:
I'll take Miss Marple over these modern day sleuths any
day...
I think I've seen three different versions of "Miss Marple"
over the years .... or, maybe, the actress just kept having
extreme surgery over time.
Or regenerate.
You're a bit late to the party Dave, Mike already did that one!
But if the BBC ever do Marple again I dread to think what Miss
Marple will regenerate into with them !!!
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0othww93f3zmx003@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
AHH!! NOOOOOO!! It seems The Last Doctor might have been
dragged over to The Dark Side!! ;-P
More like the lunatic fringe side! After all, Mike says
Doctor Who finished in 1966 yet he still watches it years
later... so anyone who would say that sort of thing is
clearly a sandwich short of a picnic.
Red Rider fan are you?
Well done Dave, it's a rare day when I see a witty riposte from
Mr Yadallee that I actually understand!
In article <xn0oti2lu3msvht000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
You can never have enough Agatha Christie dramatisations...
Although I still prefer the Joan Hickson BBC produced
version of the Marple canon to the more recent ITV
'interpretations'.
so which is a Moffat and which is a Chibnall?
In article <xn0oti31d3nfae0001@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0othuu93ca1ew000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
I am not my own news server but I can still filter out
people and/or posts that I don't want to see.
Guess which is more powerful? [corrected]
I don't need to guess anything. I can spell [well, sometimes]
compose sentences properly, trim quotes, use filters... as
well as having the ability to killfile somebody. So I am
happy enough with my powers.
You OTOH... run an ISP and your own news server, you don't
follow any established Usenet netiquette whatsoever... plus
you type posts like a cat walking across a keyboard. So if
you feel that's more powerful, great! Carry on then...
<rolls eyes>
So what is nettiquette?
Blueshirt wrote on 19/11/24 10:38 pm:
Daniel70 wrote:
And, given the use of a PVR Hard Drive, a USB Drive, and a
Laptop (this one) with a DVD Burner, I should be right for
life ....
You can use a PVR, a laptop and a DVD burner, but you can't
use a VPN?!
I've used a PVR. I've used a Laptop. I've burnt CD/DVDs.
I've never used a VPN! Never had a need to.
In article <xn0othwjp3eltnj001@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
You're on a roll today Mike!
Rolling into the River.
In article <vhi3hg$1rqjr$1@dont-email.me>,
The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
I’m a specialist repairer of cobblers’ tools. Not
much call for it, if I’m honest.
Well you can still cobble something up.
But if the BBC ever do Marple again I dread to think what
Miss Marple will regenerate into with them !!!
Like Nicola Bryant as Miss Marple?
In article <xn0oti3x43ok55x009@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
So what is nettiquette?
Good behaviour guidelines, as in...respectful and appropriate
communication on the internet. As the CEO of an ISP you
should know exactly what it is. But of course, you just do
your own thing anyway.
Maybe you should e-mail this link out to your three
customers...
Guidelines not standards!
Daniel70 wrote:
Blueshirt wrote on 19/11/24 10:38 pm:
Daniel70 wrote:
And, given the use of a PVR Hard Drive, a USB Drive, and a
Laptop (this one) with a DVD Burner, I should be right for
life ....
You can use a PVR, a laptop and a DVD burner, but you can't
use a VPN?!
I've used a PVR. I've used a Laptop. I've burnt CD/DVDs.
I've never used a VPN! Never had a need to.
I hope you live long enough to see Ncuti Gatwa in action so...
as we could be in the 17th Doctor's era before ABC show his
Doctor Who episodes. ;-)
Blueshirt wrote on 19/11/24 1:37 am:
Daniel70 wrote:Yeap. I can relate .... When I was in The Australian Army, more often
Blueshirt wrote:
Happy Christmas!
A TAD early, aren't you, Blueshirt?? (Yes, I can be a Grinch
at times.)
Tell that to the shops...
than not the period from Melbourne Cup Day (first Tuesday in November)
marked the start of "Silly Season" with various Troop, Company,
Regiment and Mess Dinners (i.e. Christmas piss-ups) having to occur.
The shops have only just started the extended seasons.
On 2024-11-19 11:04:56 +0000, Daniel70 said:
Blueshirt wrote on 19/11/24 1:37 am:
Daniel70 wrote:Yeap. I can relate .... When I was in The Australian Army, more often
Blueshirt wrote:
Happy Christmas!
A TAD early, aren't you, Blueshirt?? (Yes, I can be a Grinch
at times.)
Tell that to the shops...
than not the period from Melbourne Cup Day (first Tuesday in November)
marked the start of "Silly Season" with various Troop, Company,
Regiment and Mess Dinners (i.e. Christmas piss-ups) having to occur.
The shops have only just started the extended seasons.
The shops here have had their Christmas stock on the shelves for about
two months already. One house around here has all their Christmas
decorations up inside and another has their silly inflatable garden >decorations out too. The main Auckland City Santa Parade is on 24
November, with many city suburbs having their own Santa parades during >November and Decmber.. :-\
In article <xn0oti31d3nfae0001@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0othuu93ca1ew000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0otgnjlktgsfq00b@news.eternal-september.org>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
RADW is a free space for all. If you don't want to read
posts from certain people, killfile them...
Or be your own news server!
I am not my own news server but I can still filter out people
and/or posts that I don't want to see.
Guess which is more powerful? [corrected]
I don't need to guess anything. I can spell [well, sometimes]
compose sentences properly, trim quotes, use filters... as well
as having the ability to killfile somebody. So I am happy enough
with my powers.
You OTOH... run an ISP and your own news server, you don't
follow any established Usenet netiquette whatsoever... plus you
type posts like a cat walking across a keyboard. So if you feel
that's more powerful, great! Carry on then... <rolls eyes>
So what is nettiquette?
In article <xn0oti3x43ok55x009@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0oti31d3nfae0001@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0othuu93ca1ew000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
I am not my own news server but I can still filter out
people and/or posts that I don't want to see.
Guess which is more powerful? [corrected]
I don't need to guess anything. I can spell [well, sometimes]
compose sentences properly, trim quotes, use filters... as
well as having the ability to killfile somebody. So I am
happy enough with my powers.
You OTOH... run an ISP and your own news server, you don't
follow any established Usenet netiquette whatsoever... plus
you type posts like a cat walking across a keyboard. So if
you feel that's more powerful, great! Carry on then...
<rolls eyes>
So what is nettiquette?
Good behaviour guidelines, as in...respectful and appropriate
communication on the internet. As the CEO of an ISP you should
know exactly what it is. But of course, you just do your own
thing anyway.
Maybe you should e-mail this link out to your three customers...
https://www.lsu.edu/internet/usenet/usenet-etiquette.html#:~:text=Do%20not%20post%20copyrighted%20materials,posting%20is%20a%20good%20idea.
Guidelines not standards!
On 2024-11-19 3:50 a.m., Daniel70 wrote:
Blueshirt wrote on 19/11/24 2:01 am:
The Doctor wrote:He HAS .... but still reply to him through anybody else that replies
In article <vhf3fn$16dln$2@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
Idlehands wrote on 18/11/24 3:35 pm:
Poor binky, "runs" and ISP but has no clue how to thread
messages or follow a thread.
I answered his questions (through your post) but he can't
see it what a sad excuse for a Sys Admin.
Lying Idlehands lies again!
Yes, how sad!!
Don't be sad! Ban Idlehands!
RADW is a free space for all. If you don't want to read posts
from certain people, killfile them...
to Idlehands. How deep has Idlehands gotten into Gobble-de-gooks mind??
I live rent free in that shit strewn barren wilderness he calls a
"mind". The least one could do when inviting company is clean up and
use a little air freshener.
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0othwjp3eltnj001@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
You're on a roll today Mike!
Rolling into the River.
And we're rolling... ooh <rolls arms>, rolling... ooh <rolls
arms>, rolling on the river...
Daniel70 wrote:
Blueshirt wrote on 19/11/24 10:32 pm:
Daniel70 wrote:That's enough, isn't it??
Blueshirt wrote on 19/11/24 1:18 am:
I think I've seen three different versions of "Miss Marple"
I'll take Miss Marple over these modern day sleuths any
day...
over the years .... or, maybe, the actress just kept having
extreme surgery over time.
Only three?!
You can never have enough Agatha Christie dramatisations...
Although I still prefer the Joan Hickson BBC produced version of
the Marple canon to the more recent ITV 'interpretations'.
In article <vi1jbh$2nm85$2@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 24/11/24 11:29 pm:
In article <vhv1sb$274u5$3@dont-email.me>, Daniel70
<daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 24/11/24 12:51 am:
In article <vhsbbr$1lurc$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel70
<daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 23/11/24 9:54 am:
<Snip>
WHAT "Idols of Jesus Christ and Mother MAry", Gobble-de-gook??Well I've got ZERO idea what "Ilols" are, Gobble-de-gook, so I'llAlso how many visible idols are ther in the RCC?
None, Gobble-de-gook!!
So no Ilols of Jesus Christ and Mother Mary in the RCC?
say *NO* !! -- Daniel
And Idols of Jesus Christ and Mother MAry?
I see them in Catholic Church upon visit.
In article <vi1u9j$2pjes$2@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
Blueshirt wrote on 25/11/24 10:59 pm:
Your Name wrote:
On 2024-11-24 23:01:51 +0000, Blueshirt said:
The Doctor wrote:
And Idols of Jesus Christ and Mother MAry?
Most Christian churches have a depiction of a cross with
Jewsus on it somewhere within them as a symbol of the
crucifiction ... is that not idolatry?
Jewsus ... that must be the Jewish version.
Exactly!
Christianity derived from Judaism so it's apt.
I've typed it before and I'll type it again ....
"Christianity is a Jewish Sect!!"
Then how come Catholicism has major elements of paganry?
The Doctor wrote on 26/11/24 3:05 am:
Then how come Catholicism has major elements of paganry?
The Pagan SAW how much better it was to "follow" Catholic
Rites and Rituals than to stay as Pagans, Gobble-de-gook, ...
YOU know "Safety in Numbers!!".
Blueshirt wrote on 26/11/24 1:30 am:
Daniel70 wrote:
I sure hope that's a JOKE, Blueshirt ..... else Mrs
Blueshirt had better watch out!!
Well, she seems happy enough... although she first came in
to my life as my Nanny when I was younger, with her
Rotweiler... that I called Dave. She's stuck around ever
since to guide me on my path...
A nice woman.
Hmm! So Mrs Blueshirt was your Nanny!! Are you 'INTO' older
women, then, Blueshirt ..... or does "Mrs Blueshirt" have a
different meaning in your vocabulary??
In article <vi2s4r$31hh3$2@dont-email.me>,
Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:
On 2024-11-25 19:52:26 +0000, Blueshirt said:
The Doctor wrote:
True Christianty.
Now there's an oxymoron if ever there was...
All religions are full of morons. ;-p
Atheist is complete with idiots.
On 05/11/2024 06:11, The Doctor wrote:
I am hoping for a Donald J. Trump win!
Your hopes have been fulfilled. The BBC/CBS have finally called it for Trump. Everyone else figured it out the moment the Democrats went totally woke. Get Woke, Go Broke!
That way Tim Bruening has a total mental breakdown!
Now I have to rewrite The Menace Within. Still, it's closer to the realy 2024 than The Tenth Planet was to the real 1986.
Looks like a Republican President, Senate and Congress in the
USA!
Tim Bruening must be getting ready to fight for his life!
I am hoping for a Donald J. Trump win!
That way Tim Bruening has a total mental breakdown!
The Doctor wrote on 6/11/24 5:17 pm:
<Snip>
Looks like a Republican President, Senate and Congress in the USA!Tim sure *IS* living, rent free, in YOUR Head, isn't he, Gobble-de-gook??
Tim Bruening must be getting ready to fight for his life!
--
Daniel
The Doctor wrote:
Looks like a Republican President, Senate and Congress in the
USA!
It's democracy Jim... but not as we know it.
Tim Bruening must be getting ready to fight for his life!
I doubt Tim's life will change much. After all, a very big
change to his life already happened under Joe Biden... Google
withdrew access to Usenet from Google Groups. It all went
downhill for Tim after that. What more can Trump do?
Maybe you should send Tim an e-mail and check-in on him? You
seem very concerned about his welfare.
On 05/11/2024 06:11, The Doctor wrote:
I am hoping for a Donald J. Trump win!
Your hopes have been fulfilled. The BBC/CBS have finally called it for
Trump. Everyone else figured it out the moment the Democrats went
totally woke. Get Woke, Go Broke!
That way Tim Bruening has a total mental breakdown!
Now I have to rewrite The Menace Within. Still, it's closer to the realy
2024 than The Tenth Planet was to the real 1986.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." -William Shatner
The True Doctor wrote:
On 05/11/2024 06:11, The Doctor wrote:totally woke. Get Woke, Go Broke!
I am hoping for a Donald J. Trump win!
Your hopes have been fulfilled. The BBC/CBS have finally called it for >Trump. Everyone else figured it out the moment the Democrats went
The fact that Donald Trump was the name used by both camps in most
speeches should have been enough. Trump talked about his plans to MAGA,
the opposistion spent all of their time demonising Trump. There seemed
to be no vote for us because of x, y and z, from the Democrats... more a
case of, don't vote for Trump because of x, y and z!
realy 2024 than The Tenth Planet was to the real 1986.That way Tim Bruening has a total mental breakdown!
Now I have to rewrite The Menace Within. Still, it's closer to the
Nothing wrong with a rewrite... although you should have seen the
writing on the wall! (Pun intended.)
In article <xn0oszlc6e8vz000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Tim Bruening must be getting ready to fight for his life!
I doubt Tim's life will change much. After all, a very big
change to his life already happened under Joe Biden... Google
withdrew access to Usenet from Google Groups. It all went
downhill for Tim after that. What more can Trump do?
Maybe you should send Tim an e-mail and check-in on him? You
seem very concerned about his welfare.
I will taunt Tim! I know how!
Tim did say his older girlfirnd left him a cat while she moved
out of state.
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0oszlc6e8vz000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Tim Bruening must be getting ready to fight for his life!
I doubt Tim's life will change much. After all, a very big
change to his life already happened under Joe Biden... Google
withdrew access to Usenet from Google Groups. It all went
downhill for Tim after that. What more can Trump do?
Maybe you should send Tim an e-mail and check-in on him? You
seem very concerned about his welfare.
I will taunt Tim! I know how!
If you taunt Tim and he returns here to annoy you, by aiming for
your [very important] top poster of RADW crown, it's you that
will be the first person complaining about him. Just remember
that!
Daniel70 wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 6/11/24 5:17 pm:
<Snip>
Looks like a Republican President, Senate and Congress in the USA!Tim sure *IS* living, rent free, in YOUR Head, isn't he, Gobble-de-gook??
Tim Bruening must be getting ready to fight for his life!
why are you the only onementioning tim
The Doctor wrote:
In article <vgfdbv$22b15$1@dont-email.me>,i told him he got dumped but he wouldn't hear of it
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 6/11/24 1:52 am:
In article <vgcevn$1dl9s$1@dont-email.me>,Yeah!! The very idea if YOU, Gobble-de-gook, meeting ANY woman who
Woozy Song <suzyw0ng@outlook.com> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
I am hoping for a Donald J. Trump win!Maybe he met a child-less cat lady and lived happily ever after.
That way Tim Bruening has a total mental breakdown!
If only!
wasn't YOUR mother is plainly ridiculous!!
No!
Tim did say his older girlfirnd left him a cat while she moved out of state. >>
--
Daniel
In article <xn0oszri08qnyf000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
I will taunt Tim! I know how!
If you taunt Tim and he returns here to annoy you, by aiming
for your [very important] top poster of RADW crown, it's you
that will be the first person complaining about him. Just
remember that!
If he knows how to come back to Usenet.
BTW, I did taunt tim!
The Doctor wrote:
Tim did say his older girlfirnd left him a cat while she moved
out of state.
The cat wouldn't care... as long as somebody fed it.
“Like sewage and smartphones and Donald Trump, some things
are just inevitable.” - The 12th Doctor
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0oszlc6e8vz000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Tim Bruening must be getting ready to fight for his life!
I doubt Tim's life will change much. After all, a very big
change to his life already happened under Joe Biden... Google
withdrew access to Usenet from Google Groups. It all went
downhill for Tim after that. What more can Trump do?
Maybe you should send Tim an e-mail and check-in on him? You
seem very concerned about his welfare.
I will taunt Tim! I know how!
If you taunt Tim and he returns here to annoy you, by aiming for
your [very important] top poster of RADW crown, it's you that
will be the first person complaining about him. Just remember
that!
solar penguin wrote:
“Like sewage and smartphones and Donald Trump, some things
are just inevitable.” - The 12th Doctor
As a Time Lord he obviously knew that Donald Trump was going to
win a second term in 2024... ;-)
“Like sewage and smartphones and Donald Trump, some things
are just inevitable.” - The 12th Doctor
--
solar penguin
The Doctor wrote:
Tim did say his older girlfirnd left him a cat while she moved
out of state.
The cat wouldn't care... as long as somebody fed it.
On 2024-11-06 7:18 a.m., Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0oszlc6e8vz000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Tim Bruening must be getting ready to fight for his life!
I doubt Tim's life will change much. After all, a very big
change to his life already happened under Joe Biden... Google
withdrew access to Usenet from Google Groups. It all went
downhill for Tim after that. What more can Trump do?
Maybe you should send Tim an e-mail and check-in on him? You
seem very concerned about his welfare.
I will taunt Tim! I know how!
If you taunt Tim and he returns here to annoy you, by aiming for
your [very important] top poster of RADW crown, it's you that
will be the first person complaining about him. Just remember
that!
Having been cut off Usenet, Tim was in severe withdrawal and chose to
start taking long walks to deal with his loss.
He met a lovely lady out walking as well and struck up a conversation
and that lead to a cup of coffee and that lead to the start of genuine relationship which showed Tim there is life away from the keyboard.
This is a story that will never ever contain the name Binky/The Doctor/Yads. He will die alone and unlamented.
In article <xn0oszrmr8xgqx002@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Tim did say his older girlfirnd left him a cat while she moved
out of state.
The cat wouldn't care... as long as somebody fed it.
He feeds the cat.
I have 3 cats! The oldest on suffers from cataracts.
The Doctor wrote on 7/11/24 3:19 am:
I have 3 cats! The oldest on suffers from cataracts.
A CAT with CATaracts!!
Doctor Who is a MALE orientated show representing male values, the
hero's journey, masculinity, logic, reason, and scientific thinking and methodology triumphing over female sentiment and emotion, and therefore appeals only to men and boys and people who are already scientifically orientated. It's not there for a bunch of man hating fourth wave lesbian feminist activist bigots. Virtually everything on television today is
made exclusively for non-aspirational women, and it is totally
mind-numbing for those with intelligence. It's time to make something
for men and other people with intelligence again.
On 12/11/2024 11:26, Daniel70 wrote:
The True Doctor wrote on 12/11/24 6:29 am:
On 11/11/2024 09:46, Daniel70 wrote:So no responce to my second situation/question??
The True Doctor wrote on 11/11/24 7:08 am:
On 10/11/2024 12:29, Blueshirt wrote:
<Snip>
Coming from somebody who was also posting here on RADW
against a female Doctor from day one (i.e. the day of and
after Jodie Whittaker's casting.) I don't know how you can
seriously claim you gave her a chance. The evidence proves
otherwise.
Of course he gave her a chance. He watched her first episode
just like over 10 million other people including myself.
Giving someone a chance don't mean you have to support and
believe in them from the very start. In fact it means the
exact opposite, not supporting or believing in them but
letting them try to persuade you otherwise.
When you watched the first 'DoctorDavid' episode, were you
thinking "This is going to be the best thing since sliced
bread" ..... or were you thinking "This could be all right,
I'll give it a go and see what happens??"
The latter.
Same Situation .... this time for 'JodieDoctor'??
You didn't provide any choice.
From the start with its failure to play the opening theme music and
its depiction of a weak male character with dyspraxia
I thought it going to be crap, and so it was, especially when--
Whittaker appeared.
The majority of viewers though exactly the same way as by the end of
the first series the viewership had more than halved and by the end
of Whittaker's run she had lost 3/4 of the viewers.
On 2024-11-12 1:13 p.m., Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Still lokking forward to Trump arresting paedophiles
and Deep State Actors.
He'd want to start with the churches...
You wouldn't need to look too far there for some deep state
activity and cover-ups.
Binky has declared himself a full blown Trump supporter
meaning he is willing to swallow anything and everything the
MAGA movement puts out there.
So once again he doesn't have to think for himself as Trump
with "think" for him. However not sure how he reconciles his
claim of being a "Christian" while supporting the orange
Cheeto.
The True Doctor wrote on 13/11/24 6:13 am:
<Snip>
Doctor Who is a MALE orientated show representing male
values, the hero's journey, masculinity, logic, reason, and
scientific thinking and methodology triumphing over female
sentiment and emotion, and therefore appeals only to men
and boys and people who are already scientifically
orientated. It's not there for a bunch of man hating fourth
wave lesbian feminist activist bigots. Virtually everything
on television today is made exclusively for
non-aspirational women, and it is totally mind-numbing for
those with intelligence. It's time to make something for
men and other people with intelligence again.
"It's time to make something for men and other people with
intelligence again."
Does that mean Men don't have "intelligence"?? And who are
these "other people with intelligence"??
Idlehands wrote:
On 2024-11-12 1:13 p.m., Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Still lokking forward to Trump arresting paedophiles
and Deep State Actors.
He'd want to start with the churches...
You wouldn't need to look too far there for some deep state
activity and cover-ups.
Binky has declared himself a full blown Trump supporter
meaning he is willing to swallow anything and everything the
MAGA movement puts out there.
So, a British born Indian that has been exiled to Canada wants
to Make America Great Again?
Right.
So once again he doesn't have to think for himself as Trump
with "think" for him. However not sure how he reconciles his
claim of being a "Christian" while supporting the orange
Cheeto.
I hope Donald Trump has brushed up on his KJV Bible...
The True Doctor wrote on 13/11/24 6:19 am:
On 12/11/2024 11:26, Daniel70 wrote:
So no responce to my second situation/question??
You didn't provide any choice.
When you watched the first 'JodieDoctor' episode, were you
thinking "This is going to be the best thing since sliced
bread" ..... or were you thinking "This could be all right,
I'll give it a go and see what happens??"
On 2024-11-13 6:37 a.m., Blueshirt wrote:
Idlehands wrote:
Binky has declared himself a full blown Trump supporter
meaning he is willing to swallow anything and everything
the MAGA movement puts out there.
So once again he doesn't have to think for himself as Trump
with "think" for him. However not sure how he reconciles
his claim of being a "Christian" while supporting the
orange Cheeto.
I hope Donald Trump has brushed up on his KJV Bible...
A true follower would be purchasing a MAGA Bible to display
his love of orange and reject the KJV as blasphemy.
In article <xn0ot8fsmcjbz24000@news.eternal-september.org>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
You - and others - don't like a lot of the recent changes, I
get that, but you do still have the choice to switch off or
change the channel. Which I would assume is what most
sensible people do when they are watching stuff on the TV
that irritates them.
I am giving Ncuti a chance.
RTD OTOH ...
In article <xn0ot8gbncjyapz002@news.eternal-september.org>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Still lokking forward to Trump arresting paedophiles
and Deep State Actors.
He'd want to start with the churches...
You wouldn't need to look too far there for some deep state
activity and cover-ups.
IYIO. Just sit back and watch.
The True Doctor wrote on 13/11/24 6:13 am:
<Snip>
Doctor Who is a MALE orientated show representing male values, the"It's time to make something for men and other people with intelligence >again."
hero's journey, masculinity, logic, reason, and scientific thinking and
methodology triumphing over female sentiment and emotion, and therefore
appeals only to men and boys and people who are already scientifically
orientated. It's not there for a bunch of man hating fourth wave lesbian
feminist activist bigots. Virtually everything on television today is
made exclusively for non-aspirational women, and it is totally
mind-numbing for those with intelligence. It's time to make something
for men and other people with intelligence again.
Does that mean Men don't have "intelligence"?? And who are these "other >people with intelligence"??
--
Daniel
The True Doctor wrote on 13/11/24 6:19 am:
On 12/11/2024 11:26, Daniel70 wrote:
The True Doctor wrote on 12/11/24 6:29 am:
On 11/11/2024 09:46, Daniel70 wrote:So no responce to my second situation/question??
The True Doctor wrote on 11/11/24 7:08 am:
On 10/11/2024 12:29, Blueshirt wrote:
<Snip>
Coming from somebody who was also posting here on RADW
against a female Doctor from day one (i.e. the day of and
after Jodie Whittaker's casting.) I don't know how you can
seriously claim you gave her a chance. The evidence proves
otherwise.
Of course he gave her a chance. He watched her first episode
just like over 10 million other people including myself.
Giving someone a chance don't mean you have to support and
believe in them from the very start. In fact it means the
exact opposite, not supporting or believing in them but
letting them try to persuade you otherwise.
When you watched the first 'DoctorDavid' episode, were you
thinking "This is going to be the best thing since sliced
bread" ..... or were you thinking "This could be all right,
I'll give it a go and see what happens??"
The latter.
Same Situation .... this time for 'JodieDoctor'??
You didn't provide any choice.
When you watched the first 'JodieDoctor' episode, were you thinking
"This is going to be the best thing since sliced bread" ..... or were
you thinking "This could be all right, I'll give it a go and see what >happens??"
From the start with its failure to play the opening theme music and
its depiction of a weak male character with dyspraxia
One on the co-travellers. Whoopee!!
I thought it going to be crap, and so it was, especially when--
Whittaker appeared.
The majority of viewers though exactly the same way as by the end of
the first series the viewership had more than halved and by the end
of Whittaker's run she had lost 3/4 of the viewers.
Daniel
Idlehands wrote:
On 2024-11-12 1:13 p.m., Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Still lokking forward to Trump arresting paedophiles
and Deep State Actors.
He'd want to start with the churches...
You wouldn't need to look too far there for some deep state
activity and cover-ups.
Binky has declared himself a full blown Trump supporter
meaning he is willing to swallow anything and everything the
MAGA movement puts out there.
So, a British born Indian that has been exiled to Canada wants
to Make America Great Again?
Right.
So once again he doesn't have to think for himself as Trump
with "think" for him. However not sure how he reconciles his
claim of being a "Christian" while supporting the orange
Cheeto.
I hope Donald Trump has brushed up on his KJV Bible...
Daniel70 wrote:
The True Doctor wrote on 13/11/24 6:13 am:
<Snip>
Doctor Who is a MALE orientated show representing male"It's time to make something for men and other people with
values, the hero's journey, masculinity, logic, reason, and
scientific thinking and methodology triumphing over female
sentiment and emotion, and therefore appeals only to men
and boys and people who are already scientifically
orientated. It's not there for a bunch of man hating fourth
wave lesbian feminist activist bigots. Virtually everything
on television today is made exclusively for
non-aspirational women, and it is totally mind-numbing for
those with intelligence. It's time to make something for
men and other people with intelligence again.
intelligence again."
Does that mean Men don't have "intelligence"?? And who are
these "other people with intelligence"??
Kaleds obviously.
And women, maybe, but definitely not all of them... they are too
sentimental and emotional!
Daniel70 wrote:
The True Doctor wrote on 13/11/24 6:19 am:
On 12/11/2024 11:26, Daniel70 wrote:
So no responce to my second situation/question??
You didn't provide any choice.
When you watched the first 'JodieDoctor' episode, were you
thinking "This is going to be the best thing since sliced
bread" ..... or were you thinking "This could be all right,
I'll give it a go and see what happens??"
Go back in the RADW Usenet archive to 2017 and you'll know
exactly what Agamemnon was thinking. It's nothing surprising
though... as I said last week, he is consistent.
Actually, I reckon most of Agamemnon's posts here since Missy
was introduced have just been cut-and-paste jobs. As the leader
of the 'Anti-Insoc League' AGA's campaign manifesto of 2024 is
composed of the same anti-woke policies as his one from ten
years ago... bar some minor adjustments. Once you've read one,
you've read them all.
Idlehands wrote:
On 2024-11-13 6:37 a.m., Blueshirt wrote:
Idlehands wrote:
Binky has declared himself a full blown Trump supporter
meaning he is willing to swallow anything and everything
the MAGA movement puts out there.
So once again he doesn't have to think for himself as Trump
with "think" for him. However not sure how he reconciles
his claim of being a "Christian" while supporting the
orange Cheeto.
I hope Donald Trump has brushed up on his KJV Bible...
A true follower would be purchasing a MAGA Bible to display
his love of orange and reject the KJV as blasphemy.
https://www.amazon.com/Bible-Hardcover-Handcrafted-Artisan-Designed/dp/B0CTR6MN23
Trump has his own Bible?
Why am I not surprised!
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0ot8fsmcjbz24000@news.eternal-september.org>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
You - and others - don't like a lot of the recent changes, I
get that, but you do still have the choice to switch off or
change the channel. Which I would assume is what most
sensible people do when they are watching stuff on the TV
that irritates them.
I am giving Ncuti a chance.
Yes, you should... let's see what Christmas and the new season
in 2025 brings... I'm looking forward to it.
RTD OTOH ...
That's RTD, the guy the BBC brought in to save the show from
Chibnollocks is it?!
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0ot8gbncjyapz002@news.eternal-september.org>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Still lokking forward to Trump arresting paedophiles
and Deep State Actors.
He'd want to start with the churches...
You wouldn't need to look too far there for some deep state
activity and cover-ups.
IYIO. Just sit back and watch.
Yes, it is my opinion... and with the churches once you lift up
that stone you always find a damp mess of nastiness underneath.
It's whether people have the desire to actually look... but seek
and you shall find.
The True Doctor wrote:
On 12/11/2024 00:29, Blueshirt wrote:
I refuse to watch a ton of stuff on the TV that I know I
won't like. (S2 of Rings of Power being the latest example.)
Why do Doctor Who fans persevere with watching Doctor Who
and continue bleating about it? You'll achieve just as much
in life by going outside, shaking your fist at the sky and
screaming "Down with the modern world"!
No I won't. What I will do is stop buying the merchandise
(which I have already done) and stop others from doing so by
showing how fans have been deliberately attacked, alienated
and disenfranchise in order to serve a bunch of totally
degenerate woke activists who have always hated Doctor Who and
want it made only for them and not for the people who actually
watch it and were the ones responsible for its popularity.
Doctor Who is a MALE orientated show representing male values,
the hero's journey, masculinity, logic, reason, and scientific
thinking and methodology triumphing over female sentiment and
emotion, and therefore appeals only to men and boys and people
who are already scientifically orientated. It's not there for
a bunch of man hating fourth wave lesbian feminist activist
bigots. Virtually everything on television today is made
exclusively for non-aspirational women, and it is totally
mind-numbing for those with intelligence. It's time to make
something for men and other people with intelligence again.
You say is, I say was... although with Ncuti Gatwa as the
current Doctor you have your male orientated show back!
For me, it makes sense for television shows to change and adapt
if they are going to be around for sixty years. I see the
changes in Doctor Who as the production team trying to modernise
the show... and there have been a variety of big changes to the
show's lore over the many years as producers and script editors
have brought their own ideas on-board. Some good, some not so
good. (That would be a whole discussion by itself!)
I accept that not every change is great, (I hated those humpback
Dalek things that Moffat brought in) but I do understand why the
show's Executive Producers want "Doctor Who" to evolve and right
or wrong they all have their own way of doing that... or, trying
to anyway.
You - and others - don't like a lot of the recent changes, I get
that, but you do still have the choice to switch off or change
the channel. Which I would assume is what most sensible people
do when they are watching stuff on the TV that irritates them.
The True Doctor wrote on 13/11/24 6:13 am:
<Snip>
Doctor Who is a MALE orientated show representing male values, the"It's time to make something for men and other people with intelligence again."
hero's journey, masculinity, logic, reason, and scientific thinking
and methodology triumphing over female sentiment and emotion, and
therefore appeals only to men and boys and people who are already
scientifically orientated. It's not there for a bunch of man hating
fourth wave lesbian feminist activist bigots. Virtually everything on
television today is made exclusively for non-aspirational women, and
it is totally mind-numbing for those with intelligence. It's time to
make something for men and other people with intelligence again.
Does that mean Men don't have "intelligence"?? And who are these "other people with intelligence"??
The True Doctor wrote on 13/11/24 6:19 am:
On 12/11/2024 11:26, Daniel70 wrote:
The True Doctor wrote on 12/11/24 6:29 am:
On 11/11/2024 09:46, Daniel70 wrote:So no responce to my second situation/question??
The True Doctor wrote on 11/11/24 7:08 am:
On 10/11/2024 12:29, Blueshirt wrote:
<Snip>
Coming from somebody who was also posting here on RADW
against a female Doctor from day one (i.e. the day of and
after Jodie Whittaker's casting.) I don't know how you can
seriously claim you gave her a chance. The evidence proves
otherwise.
Of course he gave her a chance. He watched her first episode
just like over 10 million other people including myself.
Giving someone a chance don't mean you have to support and
believe in them from the very start. In fact it means the
exact opposite, not supporting or believing in them but
letting them try to persuade you otherwise.
When you watched the first 'DoctorDavid' episode, were you
thinking "This is going to be the best thing since sliced
bread" ..... or were you thinking "This could be all right,
I'll give it a go and see what happens??"
The latter.
Same Situation .... this time for 'JodieDoctor'??
You didn't provide any choice.
When you watched the first 'JodieDoctor' episode, were you thinking
"This is going to be the best thing since sliced bread" ..... or were
you thinking "This could be all right, I'll give it a go and see what happens??"
From the start with its failure to play the opening theme music and
its depiction of a weak male character with dyspraxia
One on the co-travellers. Whoopee!!
I thought it going to be crap, and so it was, especially when
Whittaker appeared.
The majority of viewers though exactly the same way as by the end of
the first series the viewership had more than halved and by the end
of Whittaker's run she had lost 3/4 of the viewers.
On 13/11/2024 11:20, Daniel70 wrote:
When you watched the first 'JodieDoctor' episode, were you
thinking "This is going to be the best thing since sliced
bread" ..... or were you thinking "This could be all right,
I'll give it a go and see what happens??"
Neither. I thought it was going to be crap from the opening
second when it didn't show the title sequence or play the
theme.
On 12/11/2024 19:58, Blueshirt wrote:
You say is, I say was... although with Ncuti Gatwa as the
current Doctor you have your male orientated show back!
Ncuti Gatwa is written as a woman that does nothing but cry
and cry and cry and acts and behaves like a slut and a whore.
For me, it makes sense for television shows to change and
adapt if they are going to be around for sixty years.
If its lasted for sixty years then it didn't need fixing.
changes in Doctor Who as the production team trying to
modernise the show... and there have been a variety of big
changes to the show's lore over the many years as producers
and script editors
The modern changes made by degenerate woke retards have
totally destroyed the show by driving away 4/5 of the audience.
You - and others - don't like a lot of the recent changes, I
get that, but you do still have the choice to switch off or
change the channel. Which I would assume is what most
sensible people do when they are watching stuff on the TV
that irritates them.
4/5 of the audience has already left. Doctor Who belongs to
the long term fans who made it the success it was and are
nearly all male, not the degenerate piece of shit woke retards
to use to propagate their vile hatred of the fans and
disseminate woke propaganda which they use to sexually groom
children.
The True Doctor wrote:
On 13/11/2024 11:20, Daniel70 wrote:
When you watched the first 'JodieDoctor' episode, were you
thinking "This is going to be the best thing since sliced
bread" ..... or were you thinking "This could be all right,
I'll give it a go and see what happens??"
Neither. I thought it was going to be crap from the opening
second when it didn't show the title sequence or play the
theme.
Stop telling lies... how could you watch Jodie's first episode
(October 2018) and think anything, Doctor Who finished in 2017!
The True Doctor wrote:
On 12/11/2024 19:58, Blueshirt wrote:
You say is, I say was... although with Ncuti Gatwa as the
current Doctor you have your male orientated show back!
Ncuti Gatwa is written as a woman that does nothing but cry
and cry and cry and acts and behaves like a slut and a whore.
I agree the emotional stuff can be a bit OTT at times, but Ncuti
Gatwa does have charisma in the role and I would like to see
more Doctor action and less crying from him in S2/15.
For me, it makes sense for television shows to change and
adapt if they are going to be around for sixty years.
If its lasted for sixty years then it didn't need fixing.
Some might say Doctor Who lasted sixty years because it changed
and evolved.
changes in Doctor Who as the production team trying to
modernise the show... and there have been a variety of big
changes to the show's lore over the many years as producers
and script editors
The modern changes made by degenerate woke retards have
totally destroyed the show by driving away 4/5 of the audience.
If they can be driven away so easily I'd question how loyal fans
of the show they actually were.
You - and others - don't like a lot of the recent changes, I
get that, but you do still have the choice to switch off or
change the channel. Which I would assume is what most
sensible people do when they are watching stuff on the TV
that irritates them.
4/5 of the audience has already left. Doctor Who belongs to
the long term fans who made it the success it was and are
nearly all male, not the degenerate piece of shit woke retards
to use to propagate their vile hatred of the fans and
disseminate woke propaganda which they use to sexually groom
children.
Casual viewers come and go with every show on television.
Everyone has the right to switch off something they don't like.
I don't think "sexual grooming" has much to do with it though.
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0ot7m3tbey82o007@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
And now that RTD 2 is around ...
RTD was the saviour remember? When Chris Chibnall was being
pilloried here by you, you were also welcoming the return of
RTD... will you ever be happy?
All he has to do is retcon the Timeless Child
That's all RTD has to do is it? One thing and then everything is
rosey in the garden again is it?
Methinks you are a bit out of touch if you think it would be
THAT easy!
and not give into Disney's absurd demands.
What absurd demands are they then Dave? Please explain what
demands Disney have made on RTD/Bad Wolf? Do you think RTD is
compromising his view on the world and his idea of how he wants
"Doctor Who" to be, just to appease Disney?
Firstly, there's a good chance that without the deal with
Disney, and the subsequent funding, there might not have been
any Doctor Who on the TV.
Secondly, just say that RTD did retcon the Timeless Child during
S2/15, what then? How would that change the current incarnation
of the Doctor and his storylines? What difference would it make
to the new season of the show?
You could become a Star Trek fan [again] and relocate to one
of their newsgroups if you'd prefer a change of scenery...
No!
See, you can be sensible at times!
On 13/11/2024 11:08, Daniel70 wrote:
The True Doctor wrote on 13/11/24 6:13 am:
<Snip>
Doctor Who is a MALE orientated show representing male values, the"It's time to make something for men and other people with intelligence
hero's journey, masculinity, logic, reason, and scientific thinking
and methodology triumphing over female sentiment and emotion, and
therefore appeals only to men and boys and people who are already
scientifically orientated. It's not there for a bunch of man hating
fourth wave lesbian feminist activist bigots. Virtually everything on
television today is made exclusively for non-aspirational women, and
it is totally mind-numbing for those with intelligence. It's time to
make something for men and other people with intelligence again.
again."
Does that mean Men don't have "intelligence"?? And who are these "other
people with intelligence"??
It means that men with intelligence watch Doctor Who and form the
majority of the audience. Most women don't watch Doctor Who because they
do not have the intelligence to understand it.
I am talking about real Doctor Who not the woke degeneracy that replaced it.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." -William Shatner
On 12/11/2024 19:58, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 12/11/2024 00:29, Blueshirt wrote:
I refuse to watch a ton of stuff on the TV that I know I
won't like. (S2 of Rings of Power being the latest example.)
Why do Doctor Who fans persevere with watching Doctor Who
and continue bleating about it? You'll achieve just as much
in life by going outside, shaking your fist at the sky and
screaming "Down with the modern world"!
No I won't. What I will do is stop buying the merchandise
(which I have already done) and stop others from doing so by
showing how fans have been deliberately attacked, alienated
and disenfranchise in order to serve a bunch of totally
degenerate woke activists who have always hated Doctor Who and
want it made only for them and not for the people who actually
watch it and were the ones responsible for its popularity.
Doctor Who is a MALE orientated show representing male values,
the hero's journey, masculinity, logic, reason, and scientific
thinking and methodology triumphing over female sentiment and
emotion, and therefore appeals only to men and boys and people
who are already scientifically orientated. It's not there for
a bunch of man hating fourth wave lesbian feminist activist
bigots. Virtually everything on television today is made
exclusively for non-aspirational women, and it is totally
mind-numbing for those with intelligence. It's time to make
something for men and other people with intelligence again.
You say is, I say was... although with Ncuti Gatwa as the
current Doctor you have your male orientated show back!
Ncuti Gatwa is written as a woman that does nothing but cry and cry and
cry and acts and behaves like a slut and a whore.
For me, it makes sense for television shows to change and adapt
if they are going to be around for sixty years. I see the
If its lasted for sixty years then it didn't need fixing.
changes in Doctor Who as the production team trying to modernise
the show... and there have been a variety of big changes to the
show's lore over the many years as producers and script editors
The modern changes made by degenerate woke retards have totally
destroyed the show by driving away 4/5 of the audience.
have brought their own ideas on-board. Some good, some not so
good. (That would be a whole discussion by itself!)
I accept that not every change is great, (I hated those humpback
Dalek things that Moffat brought in) but I do understand why the
show's Executive Producers want "Doctor Who" to evolve and right
or wrong they all have their own way of doing that... or, trying
to anyway.
You - and others - don't like a lot of the recent changes, I get
that, but you do still have the choice to switch off or change
the channel. Which I would assume is what most sensible people
do when they are watching stuff on the TV that irritates them.
4/5 of the audience has already left. Doctor Who belongs to the long
term fans who made it the success it was and are nearly all male, not
the degenerate piece of shit woke retards to use to propagate their vile >hatred of the fans and disseminate woke propaganda which they use to
sexually groom children.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." -William Shatner
On 13/11/2024 20:47, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 13/11/2024 11:20, Daniel70 wrote:
When you watched the first 'JodieDoctor' episode, were you
thinking "This is going to be the best thing since sliced
bread" ..... or were you thinking "This could be all right,
I'll give it a go and see what happens??"
Neither. I thought it was going to be crap from the opening
second when it didn't show the title sequence or play the
theme.
Stop telling lies... how could you watch Jodie's first episode
(October 2018) and think anything, Doctor Who finished in 2017!
What I was watching was not Doctor Who as demonstrated by the lack of an >opening title sequence and the Doctor Who theme music.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." -William Shatner
On 13/11/2024 11:20, Daniel70 wrote:
The True Doctor wrote on 13/11/24 6:19 am:
On 12/11/2024 11:26, Daniel70 wrote:
The True Doctor wrote on 12/11/24 6:29 am:
On 11/11/2024 09:46, Daniel70 wrote:So no responce to my second situation/question??
The True Doctor wrote on 11/11/24 7:08 am:
On 10/11/2024 12:29, Blueshirt wrote:
<Snip>
Coming from somebody who was also posting here on RADW
against a female Doctor from day one (i.e. the day of and
after Jodie Whittaker's casting.) I don't know how you can
seriously claim you gave her a chance. The evidence proves
otherwise.
Of course he gave her a chance. He watched her first episode
just like over 10 million other people including myself.
Giving someone a chance don't mean you have to support and
believe in them from the very start. In fact it means the
exact opposite, not supporting or believing in them but
letting them try to persuade you otherwise.
When you watched the first 'DoctorDavid' episode, were you
thinking "This is going to be the best thing since sliced
bread" ..... or were you thinking "This could be all right,
I'll give it a go and see what happens??"
The latter.
Same Situation .... this time for 'JodieDoctor'??
You didn't provide any choice.
When you watched the first 'JodieDoctor' episode, were you thinking
"This is going to be the best thing since sliced bread" ..... or were
you thinking "This could be all right, I'll give it a go and see what
happens??"
Neither. I thought it was going to be crap from the opening second when
it didn't show the title sequence or play the theme.
From the start with its failure to play the opening theme music and
its depiction of a weak male character with dyspraxia
One on the co-travellers. Whoopee!!
I thought it going to be crap, and so it was, especially when
Whittaker appeared.
The majority of viewers though exactly the same way as by the end of
the first series the viewership had more than halved and by the end
of Whittaker's run she had lost 3/4 of the viewers.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." -William Shatner
The True Doctor wrote:
On 12/11/2024 19:58, Blueshirt wrote:
You say is, I say was... although with Ncuti Gatwa as the
current Doctor you have your male orientated show back!
Ncuti Gatwa is written as a woman that does nothing but cry
and cry and cry and acts and behaves like a slut and a whore.
I agree the emotional stuff can be a bit OTT at times, but Ncuti
Gatwa does have charisma in the role and I would like to see
more Doctor action and less crying from him in S2/15.
For me, it makes sense for television shows to change and
adapt if they are going to be around for sixty years.
If its lasted for sixty years then it didn't need fixing.
Some might say Doctor Who lasted sixty years because it changed
and evolved.
changes in Doctor Who as the production team trying to
modernise the show... and there have been a variety of big
changes to the show's lore over the many years as producers
and script editors
The modern changes made by degenerate woke retards have
totally destroyed the show by driving away 4/5 of the audience.
If they can be driven away so easily I'd question how loyal fans
of the show they actually were.
You - and others - don't like a lot of the recent changes, I
get that, but you do still have the choice to switch off or
change the channel. Which I would assume is what most
sensible people do when they are watching stuff on the TV
that irritates them.
4/5 of the audience has already left. Doctor Who belongs to
the long term fans who made it the success it was and are
nearly all male, not the degenerate piece of shit woke retards
to use to propagate their vile hatred of the fans and
disseminate woke propaganda which they use to sexually groom
children.
Casual viewers come and go with every show on television.
Everyone has the right to switch off something they don't like.
I don't think "sexual grooming" has much to do with it though.
The True Doctor wrote:
On 13/11/2024 20:47, Blueshirt wrote:don't let yourself be accountable to these wank noodles
The True Doctor wrote:
On 13/11/2024 11:20, Daniel70 wrote:
When you watched the first 'JodieDoctor' episode, were you
thinking "This is going to be the best thing since sliced
bread" ..... or were you thinking "This could be all right,
I'll give it a go and see what happens??"
Neither. I thought it was going to be crap from the opening
second when it didn't show the title sequence or play the
theme.
Stop telling lies... how could you watch Jodie's first episode
(October 2018) and think anything, Doctor Who finished in 2017!
What I was watching was not Doctor Who as demonstrated by the lack of an
opening title sequence and the Doctor Who theme music.
On 12/11/2024 14:44, Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0ot7m3tbey82o007@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
And now that RTD 2 is around ...
RTD was the saviour remember? When Chris Chibnall was being
pilloried here by you, you were also welcoming the return of
RTD... will you ever be happy?
All he has to do is retcon the Timeless Child
That's all RTD has to do is it? One thing and then everything is
rosey in the garden again is it?
Yes. That's all he has to do. Get rid of the Timeless Child monster and >remove if from all continuity. The Doctor is not a fiend from another >dimension created from an abused baby girl that was abducted, and
repeatedly experimented on and murdered, the brainwashed to become an
agent do death to countless intergalactic civilisations. Calling this
monster the Doctor is a total disgrace.
Methinks you are a bit out of touch if you think it would be
THAT easy!
You, Chibnall, and RTD are totally out of touch.
and not give into Disney's absurd demands.
What absurd demands are they then Dave? Please explain what
demands Disney have made on RTD/Bad Wolf? Do you think RTD is
Disney wants to indoctrinate and sexually groom children. Hopefully
President Donald J Trump and Elon Musk will put an end to it.
compromising his view on the world and his idea of how he wants
"Doctor Who" to be, just to appease Disney?
RTD is a disgusting woke pervert who has stated in interviews that he
gets pleasure whenever a child tells him that he realized that he was
gay after watching something RTD wrote of produced,.
Firstly, there's a good chance that without the deal with
Disney, and the subsequent funding, there might not have been
any Doctor Who on the TV.
And that would have been a good thing too.
Secondly, just say that RTD did retcon the Timeless Child during
S2/15, what then? How would that change the current incarnation
of the Doctor and his storylines? What difference would it make
to the new season of the show?
The Doctor would no longer be an evil monster based on Doomsday
(Superman's nemesis from DC Comics) waiting to be released from its host
to wreak universal havoc and destruction.
You could become a Star Trek fan [again] and relocate to one
of their newsgroups if you'd prefer a change of scenery...
No!
See, you can be sensible at times!
Why should anyone be a Star Trek fan when Star Trek has been totally >destroyed by the woke perverts and sexual groomers along with Doctor
Who, Star Wars, The Wheel of Time, and The Lord of the Rings?
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." -William Shatner
On 13/11/2024 20:42, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 12/11/2024 19:58, Blueshirt wrote:
You say is, I say was... although with Ncuti Gatwa as the
current Doctor you have your male orientated show back!
Ncuti Gatwa is written as a woman that does nothing but cry
and cry and cry and acts and behaves like a slut and a whore.
I agree the emotional stuff can be a bit OTT at times, but Ncuti
Gatwa does have charisma in the role and I would like to see
more Doctor action and less crying from him in S2/15.
His highest rating episode was the one he wasn't in. No one likes him or >wants to see the sight of him.
For me, it makes sense for television shows to change and
adapt if they are going to be around for sixty years.
If its lasted for sixty years then it didn't need fixing.
Some might say Doctor Who lasted sixty years because it changed
and evolved.
No it didn't. The ratings show otherwise. It laster 54 years and that is
all.
changes in Doctor Who as the production team trying to
modernise the show... and there have been a variety of big
changes to the show's lore over the many years as producers
and script editors
The modern changes made by degenerate woke retards have
totally destroyed the show by driving away 4/5 of the audience.
If they can be driven away so easily I'd question how loyal fans
of the show they actually were.
Why should they be forced to watch degenerate woke crap the is not
written to entertain them but to sexually groom and indoctrinate childre?
You - and others - don't like a lot of the recent changes, I
get that, but you do still have the choice to switch off or
change the channel. Which I would assume is what most
sensible people do when they are watching stuff on the TV
that irritates them.
4/5 of the audience has already left. Doctor Who belongs to
the long term fans who made it the success it was and are
nearly all male, not the degenerate piece of shit woke retards
to use to propagate their vile hatred of the fans and
disseminate woke propaganda which they use to sexually groom
children.
Casual viewers come and go with every show on television.
Everyone has the right to switch off something they don't like.
I don't think "sexual grooming" has much to do with it though.
I don't not want my licence fee money being spent on sexually grooming
and indoctrinating children and neither do the majority of licence fee >payers.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." -William Shatner
The Doctor wrote:
In article <ofmdnS2AftY7qaj6nZ2dnZfqn_udnZ2d@giganews.com>,i don't recognize that as a word
% <pursent100@gmail.com> wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 13/11/2024 20:47, Blueshirt wrote:don't let yourself be accountable to these wank noodles
The True Doctor wrote:
On 13/11/2024 11:20, Daniel70 wrote:
When you watched the first 'JodieDoctor' episode, were you
thinking "This is going to be the best thing since sliced
bread" ..... or were you thinking "This could be all right,
I'll give it a go and see what happens??"
Neither. I thought it was going to be crap from the opening
second when it didn't show the title sequence or play the
theme.
Stop telling lies... how could you watch Jodie's first episode
(October 2018) and think anything, Doctor Who finished in 2017!
What I was watching was not Doctor Who as demonstrated by the lack of an >>>> opening title sequence and the Doctor Who theme music.
wank woke for you!
I hope Donald Trump has brushed up on his KJV Bible...
A true follower would be purchasing a MAGA Bible to display his love of orange and reject the KJV as blasphemy.
https://www.amazon.com/Bible-Hardcover-Handcrafted-Artisan-Designed/dp/B0CTR6MN23
In article <xn0ot9lj7dmpm6w007@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
I am giving Ncuti a chance.
Yes, you should... let's see what Christmas and the new season
in 2025 brings... I'm looking forward to it.
RTD OTOH ...
That's RTD, the guy the BBC brought in to save the show from
Chibnollocks is it?!
He is continuing the Chibnollocks legacy!
How did Moffat up RTD?
He restored Gallifrey.
How can RTD 2 do much better?
Retcon the Timelesss Child!--
In article <xn0ot9kfkdl9fxp001@post.eweka.nl>,What has Idlehands lack (or otherwise) of Logic got to do with YOU, a
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Idlehands wrote:
On 2024-11-12 1:13 p.m., Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Still lokking forward to Trump arresting paedophiles
and Deep State Actors.
He'd want to start with the churches...
You wouldn't need to look too far there for some deep state
activity and cover-ups.
Binky has declared himself a full blown Trump supporter
meaning he is willing to swallow anything and everything the
MAGA movement puts out there.
Lying Idlehands lies again!
So, a British born Indian that has been exiled to Canada wants
to Make America Great Again?
Right.
Now you know Idlehands has no logic.
In article <vh21b2$25uvd$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The True Doctor wrote on 13/11/24 6:13 am:
<Snip>
Doctor Who is a MALE orientated show representing male values, the"It's time to make something for men and other people with intelligence
hero's journey, masculinity, logic, reason, and scientific thinking and
methodology triumphing over female sentiment and emotion, and therefore
appeals only to men and boys and people who are already scientifically
orientated. It's not there for a bunch of man hating fourth wave lesbian >>> feminist activist bigots. Virtually everything on television today is
made exclusively for non-aspirational women, and it is totally
mind-numbing for those with intelligence. It's time to make something
for men and other people with intelligence again.
again."
Does that mean Men don't have "intelligence"?? And who are these "other
people with intelligence"??
How do you read that?
In article <xn0ot9vkfe0ddnj000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Casual viewers come and go with every show on television.
Everyone has the right to switch off something they don't like.
I don't think "sexual grooming" has much to do with it though.
And now Trump is in ...
In article <vh2221$2641e$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The True Doctor wrote on 13/11/24 6:19 am:
On 12/11/2024 11:26, Daniel70 wrote:
The True Doctor wrote on 12/11/24 6:29 am:
On 11/11/2024 09:46, Daniel70 wrote:So no responce to my second situation/question??
The True Doctor wrote on 11/11/24 7:08 am:
On 10/11/2024 12:29, Blueshirt wrote:
<Snip>
Same Situation .... this time for 'JodieDoctor'??
You didn't provide any choice.
When you watched the first 'JodieDoctor' episode, were you thinking
"This is going to be the best thing since sliced bread" ..... or were
you thinking "This could be all right, I'll give it a go and see what
happens??"
From the start with its failure to play the opening theme music and
its depiction of a weak male character with dyspraxia
One on the co-travellers. Whoopee!!
What was the last live episode of Doctor wHo you saw?
On 13/11/2024 11:20, Daniel70 wrote:
The True Doctor wrote on 13/11/24 6:19 am:
On 12/11/2024 11:26, Daniel70 wrote:
The True Doctor wrote on 12/11/24 6:29 am:
On 11/11/2024 09:46, Daniel70 wrote:So no responce to my second situation/question??
The True Doctor wrote on 11/11/24 7:08 am:
On 10/11/2024 12:29, Blueshirt wrote:
<Snip>
Coming from somebody who was also posting here on RADW
against a female Doctor from day one (i.e. the day of and
after Jodie Whittaker's casting.) I don't know how you can
seriously claim you gave her a chance. The evidence proves
otherwise.
Of course he gave her a chance. He watched her first episode
just like over 10 million other people including myself.
Giving someone a chance don't mean you have to support and
believe in them from the very start. In fact it means the
exact opposite, not supporting or believing in them but
letting them try to persuade you otherwise.
When you watched the first 'DoctorDavid' episode, were you
thinking "This is going to be the best thing since sliced
bread" ..... or were you thinking "This could be all right,
I'll give it a go and see what happens??"
The latter.
Same Situation .... this time for 'JodieDoctor'??
You didn't provide any choice.
When you watched the first 'JodieDoctor' episode, were you thinking
"This is going to be the best thing since sliced bread" ..... or were
you thinking "This could be all right, I'll give it a go and see what
happens??"
Neither. I thought it was going to be crap from the opening second when
it didn't show the title sequence or play the theme.
From the start with its failure to play the opening theme music and
its depiction of a weak male character with dyspraxia
In article <vhjjqs$28q5e$1@dont-email.me>,
Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:
On 2024-11-19 11:04:56 +0000, Daniel70 said:
Blueshirt wrote on 19/11/24 1:37 am:
Daniel70 wrote:Yeap. I can relate .... When I was in The Australian Army, more often
Blueshirt wrote:
Happy Christmas!
A TAD early, aren't you, Blueshirt?? (Yes, I can be a Grinch
at times.)
Tell that to the shops...
than not the period from Melbourne Cup Day (first Tuesday in November)
marked the start of "Silly Season" with various Troop, Company,
Regiment and Mess Dinners (i.e. Christmas piss-ups) having to occur.
The shops have only just started the extended seasons.
The shops here have had their Christmas stock on the shelves for about
two months already. One house around here has all their Christmas
decorations up inside and another has their silly inflatable garden
decorations out too. The main Auckland City Santa Parade is on 24
November, with many city suburbs having their own Santa parades during
November and Decmber.. :-\
Decmber?
We've just gotten over "Black Friday" .... Even though the
13th wasn't a Friday!!
Haven't seen many House Chrissy decorations around .... YET,
but it can't be long!!
On 2024-11-19 11:04:56 +0000, Daniel70 said:
Blueshirt wrote on 19/11/24 1:37 am:
Daniel70 wrote:Yeap. I can relate .... When I was in The Australian Army, more often
Blueshirt wrote:
Happy Christmas!
A TAD early, aren't you, Blueshirt?? (Yes, I can be a Grinch
at times.)
Tell that to the shops...
than not the period from Melbourne Cup Day (first Tuesday in November)
marked the start of "Silly Season" with various Troop, Company,
Regiment and Mess Dinners (i.e. Christmas piss-ups) having to occur.
The shops have only just started the extended seasons.
The shops here have had their Christmas stock on the shelves for about
two months already. One house around here has all their Christmas
decorations up inside and another has their silly inflatable garden decorations out too. The main Auckland City Santa Parade is on 24
November, with many city suburbs having their own Santa parades during November and Decmber.. :-\
In article <xn0oti3zk3onnh800a@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
I hope you live long enough to see Ncuti Gatwa in action so...
as we could be in the 17th Doctor's era before ABC show his
Doctor Who episodes. ;-)
NCuti is the rel 14th and David tennant is the REAL 13th!
In article <xn0oti3aj3nskht005@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0othww93f3zmx003@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
AHH!! NOOOOOO!! It seems The Last Doctor might have been
dragged over to The Dark Side!! ;-P
More like the lunatic fringe side! After all, Mike says
Doctor Who finished in 1966 yet he still watches it years
later... so anyone who would say that sort of thing is
clearly a sandwich short of a picnic.
Red Rider fan are you?
Well done Dave, it's a rare day when I see a witty riposte from
Mr Yadallee that I actually understand!
Tom Cochrane still can sing in white.
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
Idlehands wrote on 20/11/24 12:50 am:
On 2024-11-19 3:50 a.m., Daniel70 wrote:
How deep has Idlehands gotten into Gobble-de-gooks mind??
I live rent free in that shit strewn barren wilderness he calls
a "mind". The least one could do when inviting company is clean up
and use a little air freshener.
How poor are you, Idlehands, that you NEED to live there, even rent-free??
And his roommate is Tim Bruening who also lives rent-free in
the idiot’s head!
(Now there’s an idea for an Odd Couple-style sitcom!)
Idlehands wrote on 20/11/24 12:50 am:
On 2024-11-19 3:50 a.m., Daniel70 wrote:
Blueshirt wrote on 19/11/24 2:01 am:
The Doctor wrote:He HAS .... but still reply to him through anybody else that replies
In article <vhf3fn$16dln$2@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
Idlehands wrote on 18/11/24 3:35 pm:
Poor binky, "runs" and ISP but has no clue how to thread
messages or follow a thread.
I answered his questions (through your post) but he can't
see it what a sad excuse for a Sys Admin.
Lying Idlehands lies again!
Yes, how sad!!
Don't be sad! Ban Idlehands!
RADW is a free space for all. If you don't want to read posts
from certain people, killfile them...
to Idlehands. How deep has Idlehands gotten into Gobble-de-gooks mind??
I live rent free in that shit strewn barren wilderness he calls a
"mind". The least one could do when inviting company is clean up and
use a little air freshener.
How poor are you, Idlehands, that you NEED to live there, even rent-free??
The Doctor wrote on 20/11/24 2:50 am:
In article <xn0oti31d3nfae0001@post.eweka.nl>,Try this, Gobble-de-gook ....
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0othuu93ca1ew000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0otgnjlktgsfq00b@news.eternal-september.org>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
RADW is a free space for all. If you don't want to read
posts from certain people, killfile them...
Or be your own news server!
I am not my own news server but I can still filter out people
and/or posts that I don't want to see.
Guess which is more powerful? [corrected]
I don't need to guess anything. I can spell [well, sometimes]
compose sentences properly, trim quotes, use filters... as well
as having the ability to killfile somebody. So I am happy enough
with my powers.
You OTOH... run an ISP and your own news server, you don't
follow any established Usenet netiquette whatsoever... plus you
type posts like a cat walking across a keyboard. So if you feel
that's more powerful, great! Carry on then... <rolls eyes>
So what is nettiquette?
https://duckduckgo.com/?kl=us-en&q=nettiquette&t=seamonkey&iax=videos&ia=videos&iai=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv%3DCWbtbycHZok
Perhaps you'll learn something!!
--
Daniel
Blueshirt wrote on 20/11/24 2:47 am:
The Doctor wrote:C.C.R. .... now we're talking!!
In article <xn0othwjp3eltnj001@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
You're on a roll today Mike!
Rolling into the River.
And we're rolling... ooh <rolls arms>, rolling... ooh <rolls
arms>, rolling on the river...
--
Daniel
Idlehands wrote on 20/11/24 12:50 am:
On 2024-11-19 3:50 a.m., Daniel70 wrote:
Blueshirt wrote on 19/11/24 2:01 am:
The Doctor wrote:He HAS .... but still reply to him through anybody else that replies
In article <vhf3fn$16dln$2@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
Idlehands wrote on 18/11/24 3:35 pm:
Poor binky, "runs" and ISP but has no clue how to thread
messages or follow a thread.
I answered his questions (through your post) but he can't
see it what a sad excuse for a Sys Admin.
Lying Idlehands lies again!
Yes, how sad!!
Don't be sad! Ban Idlehands!
RADW is a free space for all. If you don't want to read posts
from certain people, killfile them...
to Idlehands. How deep has Idlehands gotten into Gobble-de-gooks mind??
I live rent free in that shit strewn barren wilderness he calls a
"mind". The least one could do when inviting company is clean up and
use a little air freshener.
How poor are you, Idlehands, that you NEED to live there, even rent-free??
--
Daniel
The Doctor wrote on 20/11/24 3:49 pm:
In article <vhjjqs$28q5e$1@dont-email.me>,LOOK OUT, Your Name, Gobble-de-gook is picking on YOUR spelling!! ;-P
Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:
On 2024-11-19 11:04:56 +0000, Daniel70 said:
Blueshirt wrote on 19/11/24 1:37 am:
Daniel70 wrote:Yeap. I can relate .... When I was in The Australian Army, more often
Blueshirt wrote:
Happy Christmas!
A TAD early, aren't you, Blueshirt?? (Yes, I can be a Grinch
at times.)
Tell that to the shops...
than not the period from Melbourne Cup Day (first Tuesday in November) >>>> marked the start of "Silly Season" with various Troop, Company,
Regiment and Mess Dinners (i.e. Christmas piss-ups) having to occur.
The shops have only just started the extended seasons.
The shops here have had their Christmas stock on the shelves for about
two months already. One house around here has all their Christmas
decorations up inside and another has their silly inflatable garden
decorations out too. The main Auckland City Santa Parade is on 24
November, with many city suburbs having their own Santa parades during
November and Decmber.. :-\
Decmber?
--
Daniel
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
Idlehands wrote on 20/11/24 12:50 am:
On 2024-11-19 3:50 a.m., Daniel70 wrote:
How deep has Idlehands gotten into Gobble-de-gooks mind??
I live rent free in that shit strewn barren wilderness he calls
a "mind". The least one could do when inviting company is clean up
and use a little air freshener.
How poor are you, Idlehands, that you NEED to live there, even rent-free??
And his roommate is Tim Bruening who also lives rent-free in
the idiot’s head!
(Now there’s an idea for an Odd Couple-style sitcom!)
--
solar penguin
The Doctor wrote on 20/11/24 2:51 am:
In article <xn0oti3aj3nskht005@post.eweka.nl>,WHAT?? Do YOU, Gobble-de-gook, hear peoples voices *IN COLOURS* , >Gobble-de-gook??
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0othww93f3zmx003@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
AHH!! NOOOOOO!! It seems The Last Doctor might have been
dragged over to The Dark Side!! ;-P
More like the lunatic fringe side! After all, Mike says
Doctor Who finished in 1966 yet he still watches it years
later... so anyone who would say that sort of thing is
clearly a sandwich short of a picnic.
Red Rider fan are you?
Well done Dave, it's a rare day when I see a witty riposte from
Mr Yadallee that I actually understand!
Tom Cochrane still can sing in white.
--
Daniel
In article <vhkdph$234n$1@dont-email.me>,
solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
And his roommate is Tim Bruening who also lives rent-free in
the idiot’s head!
(Now there’s an idea for an Odd Couple-style sitcom!)
Where on RADAR is Tim?
Mind you the victory of Donald Trump makes me rejoice at the
depression of Tim Breuning.
In article <vhkd8t$207i$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
We've just gotten over "Black Friday" .... Even though the
13th wasn't a Friday!!
Haven't seen many House Chrissy decorations around .... YET,
but it can't be long!!
The Offical black Friday and Cybermonday are coming!
In article <vhkeg1$26vm$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 20/11/24 2:51 am:
In article <xn0oti3aj3nskht005@post.eweka.nl>,WHAT?? Do YOU, Gobble-de-gook, hear peoples voices *IN
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Red Rider fan are you?
Well done Dave, it's a rare day when I see a witty riposte
from Mr Yadallee that I actually understand!
Tom Cochrane still can sing in white.
COLOURS* , Gobble-de-gook??
Cochrane had red hair.
The Doctor wrote:
In article <vhkd8t$207i$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
We've just gotten over "Black Friday" .... Even though the
13th wasn't a Friday!!
Haven't seen many House Chrissy decorations around .... YET,
but it can't be long!!
The Offical black Friday and Cybermonday are coming!
It's Black Dalek Friday and Cyber-Monday.
Daniel70 wrote:
We've just gotten over "Black Friday" .... Even though the
13th wasn't a Friday!!
Er... "Black Friday" is the 29th November... so it's not over
yet.
Which means there's plenty of bargains to be had...
Haven't seen many House Chrissy decorations around .... YET,
but it can't be long!!
There's a good few around here... people showing off and trying
to be one-up on the poor folk who don't do the outdoor stuff.
Or the mean people, like us, who just can't be bothered.
The Doctor wrote on 20/11/24 3:49 pm:
In article <vhjjqs$28q5e$1@dont-email.me>,
Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:
On 2024-11-19 11:04:56 +0000, Daniel70 said:
Blueshirt wrote on 19/11/24 1:37 am:
Daniel70 wrote:Yeap. I can relate .... When I was in The Australian Army, more often
Blueshirt wrote:
Happy Christmas!
A TAD early, aren't you, Blueshirt?? (Yes, I can be a Grinch
at times.)
Tell that to the shops...
than not the period from Melbourne Cup Day (first Tuesday in November) >>>> marked the start of "Silly Season" with various Troop, Company,
Regiment and Mess Dinners (i.e. Christmas piss-ups) having to occur.
The shops have only just started the extended seasons.
The shops here have had their Christmas stock on the shelves for about
two months already. One house around here has all their Christmas
decorations up inside and another has their silly inflatable garden
decorations out too. The main Auckland City Santa Parade is on 24
November, with many city suburbs having their own Santa parades during
November and Decmber.. :-\
Decmber?
LOOK OUT, Your Name, Gobble-de-gook is picking on YOUR spelling!! ;-P
The Doctor wrote:
In article <vhkdph$234n$1@dont-email.me>,
solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
And his roommate is Tim Bruening who also lives rent-free in
the idiot’s head!
(Now there’s an idea for an Odd Couple-style sitcom!)
Where on RADAR is Tim?
Send Tim an e-mail and tell him how much you miss him. Tim's
various g-mail addresses were plastered all over Usenet once so
it should be easy enough for you to do.
Mind you the victory of Donald Trump makes me rejoice at the
depression of Tim Breuning.
That's a very Christian attitude Dave... rejoicing at the
misfortune of others.
What religion teaches that one?
The Doctor wrote:
In article <vhkdph$234n$1@dont-email.me>,
solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
And his roommate is Tim Bruening who also lives rent-free in
the idiot’s head!
(Now there’s an idea for an Odd Couple-style sitcom!)
Where on RADAR is Tim?
Send Tim an e-mail and tell him how much you miss him. Tim's
various g-mail addresses were plastered all over Usenet once so
it should be easy enough for you to do.
Mind you the victory of Donald Trump makes me rejoice at the
depression of Tim Breuning.
That's a very Christian attitude Dave... rejoicing at the
misfortune of others.
What religion teaches that one?
The Doctor wrote:
In article <vhkd8t$207i$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
We've just gotten over "Black Friday" .... Even though the
13th wasn't a Friday!!
Haven't seen many House Chrissy decorations around .... YET,
but it can't be long!!
The Offical black Friday and Cybermonday are coming!
It's Black Dalek Friday and Cyber-Monday.
On 2024-11-20 17:09:03 +0000, Blueshirt said:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <vhkd8t$207i$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
We've just gotten over "Black Friday" .... Even though the
13th wasn't a Friday!!
Haven't seen many House Chrissy decorations around .... YET,
but it can't be long!!
The Offical black Friday and Cybermonday are coming!
It's Black Dalek Friday and Cyber-Monday.
Black Fri-Dalek and CyberMan-day :-p
On 2024-11-20 10:23:55 +0000, Daniel70 said:
The Doctor wrote on 20/11/24 3:49 pm:
In article <vhjjqs$28q5e$1@dont-email.me>,
Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:
On 2024-11-19 11:04:56 +0000, Daniel70 said:
Blueshirt wrote on 19/11/24 1:37 am:
Daniel70 wrote:Yeap. I can relate .... When I was in The Australian Army, more often >>>>> than not the period from Melbourne Cup Day (first Tuesday in November) >>>>> marked the start of "Silly Season" with various Troop, Company,
Blueshirt wrote:
Happy Christmas!
A TAD early, aren't you, Blueshirt?? (Yes, I can be a Grinch
at times.)
Tell that to the shops...
Regiment and Mess Dinners (i.e. Christmas piss-ups) having to occur. >>>>>
The shops have only just started the extended seasons.
The shops here have had their Christmas stock on the shelves for about >>>> two months already. One house around here has all their Christmas
decorations up inside and another has their silly inflatable garden
decorations out too. The main Auckland City Santa Parade is on 24
November, with many city suburbs having their own Santa parades during >>>> November and Decmber.. :-\
Decmber?
LOOK OUT, Your Name, Gobble-de-gook is picking on YOUR spelling!! ;-P
Yep, it's Decmber ... comes after Novmber and before Janury. It's the
lazy American spelling where they just decide to leave out an
'unnecessary' letter, like they do with "color", etc. :-p
In article <vhkc63$1q5n$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 20/11/24 3:11 am:
In article <xn0oti3x43ok55x009@post.eweka.nl>,https://www.lsu.edu/internet/usenet/usenet-etiquette.html#:~:text=Do%20not%20post%20copyrighted%20materials,posting%20is%20a%20good%20idea.
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0oti31d3nfae0001@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0othuu93ca1ew000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
I am not my own news server but I can still filter out
people and/or posts that I don't want to see.
Guess which is more powerful? [corrected]
I don't need to guess anything. I can spell [well, sometimes]
compose sentences properly, trim quotes, use filters... as
well as having the ability to killfile somebody. So I am
happy enough with my powers.
You OTOH... run an ISP and your own news server, you don't
follow any established Usenet netiquette whatsoever... plus
you type posts like a cat walking across a keyboard. So if
you feel that's more powerful, great! Carry on then...
<rolls eyes>
So what is nettiquette?
Good behaviour guidelines, as in...respectful and appropriate
communication on the internet. As the CEO of an ISP you should
know exactly what it is. But of course, you just do your own
thing anyway.
Maybe you should e-mail this link out to your three customers...
Did YOU, Gobble-de-gook,even bother to READ that net page??
Guidelines not standards!
Point ONE ... Read news.announce.newusers before you start posting
messages. This newsgroup will fill you in on the history of the usenet,
some of the newsgroups that are available, and the *rules* of etiquette.
Most of the items mentioned below are explained there.
RULES, Gobble-de-gook, not Guidelines!!
So explain September?
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
Idlehands wrote on 20/11/24 12:50 am:
On 2024-11-19 3:50 a.m., Daniel70 wrote:
How deep has Idlehands gotten into Gobble-de-gooks mind??
I live rent free in that shit strewn barren wilderness he calls
a "mind". The least one could do when inviting company is clean up
and use a little air freshener.
How poor are you, Idlehands, that you NEED to live there, even rent-free??
And his roommate is Tim Bruening who also lives rent-free in
the idiot’s head!
(Now there’s an idea for an Odd Couple-style sitcom!)
In article <vhkdph$234n$1@dont-email.me>,
solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
Idlehands wrote on 20/11/24 12:50 am:And his roommate is Tim Bruening who also lives rent-free in
On 2024-11-19 3:50 a.m., Daniel70 wrote:
How deep has Idlehands gotten into Gobble-de-gooks mind??
I live rent free in that shit strewn barren wilderness he calls
a "mind". The least one could do when inviting company is clean up >>>> and use a little air freshener.
How poor are you, Idlehands, that you NEED to live there, even rent-free?? >>
the idiot’s head!
(Now there’s an idea for an Odd Couple-style sitcom!)
Where on RADAR is Tim?
In article <xn0otjjz156078w001@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <vhkdph$234n$1@dont-email.me>,
solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
And his roommate is Tim Bruening who also lives rent-free in
the idiot’s head!
(Now there’s an idea for an Odd Couple-style sitcom!)
Where on RADAR is Tim?
Send Tim an e-mail and tell him how much you miss him. Tim's
various g-mail addresses were plastered all over Usenet once so
it should be easy enough for you to do.
Gspam? No thank you.
Mind you the victory of Donald Trump makes me rejoice at the
depression of Tim Breuning.
That's a very Christian attitude Dave... rejoicing at the
misfortune of others.
What religion teaches that one?
Atheism.
On 2024-11-20 3:06 a.m., Daniel70 wrote:
Idlehands wrote on 20/11/24 12:50 am:
On 2024-11-19 3:50 a.m., Daniel70 wrote:
Blueshirt wrote on 19/11/24 2:01 am:I live rent free in that shit strewn barren wilderness he calls a
The Doctor wrote:He HAS .... but still reply to him through anybody else that replies
In article <vhf3fn$16dln$2@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
Idlehands wrote on 18/11/24 3:35 pm:
Poor binky, "runs" and ISP but has no clue how to thread
messages or follow a thread.
I answered his questions (through your post) but he can't
see it what a sad excuse for a Sys Admin.
Lying Idlehands lies again!
Yes, how sad!!
Don't be sad! Ban Idlehands!
RADW is a free space for all. If you don't want to read posts
from certain people, killfile them...
to Idlehands. How deep has Idlehands gotten into Gobble-de-gooks mind?? >>>
"mind". The least one could do when inviting company is clean up and
use a little air freshener.
How poor are you, Idlehands, that you NEED to live there, even
rent-free??
It's not my choice, binky is obsessed with me in more ways than one
despite being told, very clearly, I am not interested and I don't swing
that way.
In article <vhkcaa$1q5n$2@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
Idlehands wrote on 20/11/24 12:50 am:
On 2024-11-19 3:50 a.m., Daniel70 wrote:
Blueshirt wrote on 19/11/24 2:01 am:I live rent free in that shit strewn barren wilderness he calls a
The Doctor wrote:He HAS .... but still reply to him through anybody else that replies
In article <vhf3fn$16dln$2@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70Â <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
Idlehands wrote on 18/11/24 3:35 pm:
Poor binky, "runs" and ISP but has no clue how to thread
messages or follow a thread.
I answered his questions (through your post) but he can't
see it what a sad excuse for a Sys Admin.
Lying Idlehands lies again!
Yes, how sad!!
Don't be sad! Ban Idlehands!
RADW is a free space for all. If you don't want to read posts
from certain people, killfile them...
to Idlehands. How deep has Idlehands gotten into Gobble-de-gooks mind?? >>>
"mind". The least one could do when inviting company is clean up and >>> use a little air freshener.
How poor are you, Idlehands, that you NEED to live there, even rent-free??
Lying Idlehands claims to work for an essential service.
On 2024-11-20 10:23:55 +0000, Daniel70 said:
The Doctor wrote on 20/11/24 3:49 pm:
In article <vhjjqs$28q5e$1@dont-email.me>,
Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:
On 2024-11-19 11:04:56 +0000, Daniel70 said:
Blueshirt wrote on 19/11/24 1:37 am:
Daniel70 wrote:Yeap. I can relate .... When I was in The Australian Army, more often >>>>> than not the period from Melbourne Cup Day (first Tuesday in November) >>>>> marked the start of "Silly Season" with various Troop, Company,
Blueshirt wrote:
Happy Christmas!
A TAD early, aren't you, Blueshirt?? (Yes, I can be a Grinch
at times.)
Tell that to the shops...
Regiment and Mess Dinners (i.e. Christmas piss-ups) having to occur. >>>>>
The shops have only just started the extended seasons.
The shops here have had their Christmas stock on the shelves for about >>>> two months already. One house around here has all their Christmas
decorations up inside and another has their silly inflatable garden
decorations out too. The main Auckland City Santa Parade is on 24
November, with many city suburbs having their own Santa parades during >>>> November and Decmber.. :-\
Decmber?
LOOK OUT, Your Name, Gobble-de-gook is picking on YOUR spelling!! ;-P
Yep, it's Decmber ... comes after Novmber and before Janury. It's the
lazy American spelling where they just decide to leave out an
'unnecessary' letter, like they do with "color", etc. :-p
Daniel70 wrote:
We've just gotten over "Black Friday" .... Even though the
13th wasn't a Friday!!
Er... "Black Friday" is the 29th November... so it's not over
yet.
Which means there's plenty of bargains to be had...
Haven't seen many House Chrissy decorations around .... YET,
but it can't be long!!
There's a good few around here... people showing off and trying
to be one-up on the poor folk who don't do the outdoor stuff.
Or the mean people, like us, who just can't be bothered.
In article <xn0otjjz156078w001@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Mind you the victory of Donald Trump makes me rejoice at the
depression of Tim Breuning.
That's a very Christian attitude Dave... rejoicing at the
misfortune of others.
What religion teaches that one?
Atheism.
On 2024-11-20 10:27:21 +0000, Blueshirt said:
Daniel70 wrote:
We've just gotten over "Black Friday" .... Even though the
13th wasn't a Friday!!
Er... "Black Friday" is the 29th November... so it's not over
yet.
"Black Friday" goes all month (if not longer). There are signs for one business near here which say "Black Friday sale all month". :-\
Some stores have already had a "This is not Black Friday Sale", and now started having their "Black Friday Sale" on Wednesday and will go
through to Sunday, when they'll then have their "Cyber Monday Sale" for
a week. Then it wil be the "pre-Christmas Sale", the "Christmas Sale",
the "Boxing Day Sale", the "New Year Sale", ...
Which means there's plenty of bargains to be had...
With pretty much every store having near-continuous sales, there are
very few real bargains. It's mostly just the same old everyday price
they've had for the rest of the year - they claim you're saving 20%, but that's off the manufacturer's original recommended retail price, which
the store has never sold it for anyway, even when the product was newly released and hasn't been sitting on store shelves for 18 months already.
Idlehands informed us:^^^^^ <- Paedophile talker noted
On 2024-11-06 7:21 a.m., Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Tim did say his older girlfirnd left him a cat while she moved
out of state.
The cat wouldn't care... as long as somebody fed it.
Binky's cats took over most of his basement hideaway, they
left him the litter box to hang out with.
Binky is toilet trained enough to use a litter box??? Wow!
I thought he just soiled his pants and didn’t even notice!
--
solar penguin
The Doctor wrote on 7/11/24 3:19 am:
In article <xn0oszrmr8xgqx002@post.eweka.nl>,A CAT with CATaracts!! How appriopiate!!
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Tim did say his older girlfirnd left him a cat while she moved
out of state.
The cat wouldn't care... as long as somebody fed it.
He feeds the cat.
I have 3 cats! The oldest on suffers from cataracts.
--
Daniel
Idlehands wrote on 7/11/24 12:14 pm:
On 2024-11-06 7:18 a.m., Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0oszlc6e8vz000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Tim Bruening must be getting ready to fight for his life!
I doubt Tim's life will change much. After all, a very big
change to his life already happened under Joe Biden... Google
withdrew access to Usenet from Google Groups. It all went
downhill for Tim after that. What more can Trump do?
Maybe you should send Tim an e-mail and check-in on him? You
seem very concerned about his welfare.
I will taunt Tim! I know how!
If you taunt Tim and he returns here to annoy you, by aiming for
your [very important] top poster of RADW crown, it's you that
will be the first person complaining about him. Just remember
that!
Having been cut off Usenet, Tim was in severe withdrawal and chose to
start taking long walks to deal with his loss.
He met a lovely lady out walking as well and struck up a conversation
and that lead to a cup of coffee and that lead to the start of genuine
relationship which showed Tim there is life away from the keyboard.
WHAT?? You mean there are TWO people who aren't on UseNet!! Well, I'll
be .....
This is a story that will never ever contain the name Binky/The
Doctor/Yads. He will die alone and unlamented.
Except that it DID. See!! ;-P
--
Daniel
Daniel70 wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 7/11/24 3:19 am:
A CAT with CATaracts!!
I have 3 cats! The oldest on suffers from cataracts.
It's not as much of a catastrophe as it would be for a cat these
days, modern vets have up to date equipment that can cater for
anything.
Idlehands informed us:
On 2024-11-06 7:21 a.m., Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Tim did say his older girlfirnd left him a cat while she moved
out of state.
The cat wouldn't care... as long as somebody fed it.
Binky's cats took over most of his basement hideaway, they
left him the litter box to hang out with.
Binky is toilet trained enough to use a litter box??? Wow!
I thought he just soiled his pants and didn’t even notice!
Idlehands wrote on 7/11/24 12:14 pm:
On 2024-11-06 7:18 a.m., Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0oszlc6e8vz000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Tim Bruening must be getting ready to fight for his life!
I doubt Tim's life will change much. After all, a very big
change to his life already happened under Joe Biden... Google
withdrew access to Usenet from Google Groups. It all went
downhill for Tim after that. What more can Trump do?
Maybe you should send Tim an e-mail and check-in on him? You
seem very concerned about his welfare.
I will taunt Tim! I know how!
If you taunt Tim and he returns here to annoy you, by aiming for
your [very important] top poster of RADW crown, it's you that
will be the first person complaining about him. Just remember
that!
Having been cut off Usenet, Tim was in severe withdrawal and chose to
start taking long walks to deal with his loss.
He met a lovely lady out walking as well and struck up a conversation
and that lead to a cup of coffee and that lead to the start of genuine
relationship which showed Tim there is life away from the keyboard.
WHAT?? You mean there are TWO people who aren't on UseNet!! Well, I'll
be .....
This is a story that will never ever contain the name Binky/The
Doctor/Yads. He will die alone and unlamented.
Except that it DID. See!! ;-P
“Like sewage and smartphones and Donald Trump, some things
are just inevitable.” - The 12th Doctor
On 06/11/2024 17:59, solar penguin wrote:
“Like sewage and smartphones and Donald Trump, some things
are just inevitable.” - The 12th Doctor
And you wonder why his ratings reached the lowest level ever. Until
Whittaker and Gatwa respectively pissed off fans even more.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." -William Shatner
On 06/11/2024 17:59, solar penguin wrote:
“Like sewage and smartphones and Donald Trump, some things
are just inevitable.” - The 12th Doctor
And you wonder why his ratings reached the lowest level ever.
Until Whittaker and Gatwa respectively pissed off fans even
more.
In article <vgjc1e$2qq4b$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 06/11/2024 17:59, solar penguin wrote:
“Like sewage and smartphones and Donald Trump, some things
are just inevitable.” - The 12th Doctor
And you wonder why his ratings reached the lowest level
ever. Until Whittaker and Gatwa respectively pissed off fans
even more.
chibnall/Whittakers Adventures of the Timeless Child
is a real low point!
Daniel70 wrote
The Doctor wrote on 7/11/24 3:19 am:
A CAT with CATaracts!!
I have 3 cats! The oldest on suffers from cataracts.
It's not as much of a catastrophe as it would be for a cat these
days, modern vets have up to date equipment that can cater for
anything.
Idlehands informed us:
On 2024-11-06 7:21 a.m., Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Tim did say his older girlfirnd left him a cat while she moved
out of state.
The cat wouldn't care... as long as somebody fed it.
Binky's cats took over most of his basement hideaway, they
left him the litter box to hang out with.
Binky is toilet trained enough to use a litter box??? Wow!
I thought he just soiled his pants and didn’t even notice!
solar penguin wrote on 7/11/24 8:05 pm:
Idlehands informed us:
Binky is toilet trained enough to use a litter box??? Wow!
I thought he just soiled his pants and didn’t even notice!
Maybe that's why his parents keep him in the Basement .... so
he doesn't have to wear any pants at all!!
Now, there's a sight NOT for sore eyes!!
Blueshirt wrote on 7/11/24 9:10 pm:
Daniel70 wrote
The Doctor wrote on 7/11/24 3:19 am:
I have 3 cats! The oldest on suffers from cataracts.
A CAT with CATaracts!!
It's not as much of a catastrophe as it would be for a cat
these days, modern vets have up to date equipment that can
cater for anything.
Quote
It's not as much of a CATastrophe as it would be for a CAT
these days, modern vets have up to date equipment that can
CATer for anything.
End Quote
That was deliberate, wasn't it, Blueshirt??
Idlehands wrote on 14/11/24 12:51 am:rd_wg=PJB86&pd_rd_r=a06a9267-8635-4fb4-8c18-e96a0db0d985&pd_rd_i=1986592022&psc=1
<Snip>
I hope Donald Trump has brushed up on his KJV Bible...
A true follower would be purchasing a MAGA Bible to display his love of
orange and reject the KJV as blasphemy.
https://www.amazon.com/Bible-Hardcover-Handcrafted-Artisan-Designed/dp/B0CTR6MN23
I love it!!
Quote
What is the Trump Bible? Just as President Thomas Jefferson wrote his
own version of the Holy Bible, so there appears to be a new version of
the Bible that's in accord with the ideology of Donald Trump.
End Quote
https://www.amazon.com/Trump-Bible-Gospel-Donald/dp/1986592022/ref=pd_vtp_d_sccl_2_2/144-7690432-1895838?pd_rd_w=g1YjG&content-id=amzn1.sym.24f6b0a2-5cf0-4c9b-b661-8bb87155495e&pf_rd_p=24f6b0a2-5cf0-4c9b-b661-8bb87155495e&pf_rd_r=ZCEWX7XH65R2C00W1Z5C&pd_
Or this one, maybe ...ZCEWX7XH65R2C00W1Z5C&pd_rd_wg=PJB86&pd_rd_r=a06a9267-8635-4fb4-8c18-e96a0db0d985&pd_rd_i=B08DC9ZVT3&psc=1
"TRUMP’S BIBLE: How Donald Trump’s Words and Deeds Reflect God’s >Teachings Paperback – July 17, 2020"
"Donald Trump has done more for Christians than any other president in
US history."
https://www.amazon.com/TRUMPS-BIBLE-Donald-Reflect-Teachings/dp/B08DC9ZVT3/ref=pd_vtp_d_sccl_2_4/144-7690432-1895838?pd_rd_w=g1YjG&content-id=amzn1.sym.24f6b0a2-5cf0-4c9b-b661-8bb87155495e&pf_rd_p=24f6b0a2-5cf0-4c9b-b661-8bb87155495e&pf_rd_r=
Or, as Gobble-de-gook reckons theres no Bible like A KJV BibleZCEWX7XH65R2C00W1Z5C&pd_rd_wg=PJB86&pd_rd_r=a06a9267-8635-4fb4-8c18-e96a0db0d985&pd_rd_i=1418541532&psc=1
"The NKJV, American Patriot's Bible, Hardcover: The Word of God and the >Shaping of America – Printed in the USA: The Word of God and the Shaping
of America Hardcover"
"The Bible alongside key events in American history. Printed in the USA."
https://www.amazon.com/NKJV-American-Patriots-Bible-Hardcover/dp/1418541532/ref=pd_vtp_d_sccl_2_1/144-7690432-1895838?pd_rd_w=g1YjG&content-id=amzn1.sym.24f6b0a2-5cf0-4c9b-b661-8bb87155495e&pf_rd_p=24f6b0a2-5cf0-4c9b-b661-8bb87155495e&pf_rd_r=
--
Daniel
The Doctor wrote on 14/11/24 2:47 am:
In article <xn0ot9lj7dmpm6w007@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
<Snip>
I am giving Ncuti a chance.
Yes, you should... let's see what Christmas and the new season
in 2025 brings... I'm looking forward to it.
RTD OTOH ...
That's RTD, the guy the BBC brought in to save the show from
Chibnollocks is it?!
He is continuing the Chibnollocks legacy!
How did Moffat up RTD?
He restored Gallifrey.
Who had done away with Gallifrey, Gobble-de-gook?? JNT, maybe!!
How can RTD 2 do much better?
By expanding on what we were left with, post Chibnall/JodieDoc.
Retcon the Timelesss Child!--
Daniel
The Doctor wrote on 14/11/24 2:38 am:
In article <vh21b2$25uvd$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The True Doctor wrote on 13/11/24 6:13 am:
<Snip>
Doctor Who is a MALE orientated show representing male values, the"It's time to make something for men and other people with intelligence
hero's journey, masculinity, logic, reason, and scientific thinking and >>>> methodology triumphing over female sentiment and emotion, and therefore >>>> appeals only to men and boys and people who are already scientifically >>>> orientated. It's not there for a bunch of man hating fourth wave lesbian >>>> feminist activist bigots. Virtually everything on television today is
made exclusively for non-aspirational women, and it is totally
mind-numbing for those with intelligence. It's time to make something
for men and other people with intelligence again.
again."
Does that mean Men don't have "intelligence"?? And who are these "other
people with intelligence"??
How do you read that?
By OPENING my eyes and having a look at the arrangement of the letters
that appear on my screen!!
--
Daniel
The Doctor wrote on 14/11/24 2:39 am:
In article <vh2221$2641e$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The True Doctor wrote on 13/11/24 6:19 am:
On 12/11/2024 11:26, Daniel70 wrote:
The True Doctor wrote on 12/11/24 6:29 am:
On 11/11/2024 09:46, Daniel70 wrote:So no responce to my second situation/question??
The True Doctor wrote on 11/11/24 7:08 am:
On 10/11/2024 12:29, Blueshirt wrote:
<Snip>
Same Situation .... this time for 'JodieDoctor'??
You didn't provide any choice.
When you watched the first 'JodieDoctor' episode, were you thinking
"This is going to be the best thing since sliced bread" ..... or were
you thinking "This could be all right, I'll give it a go and see what
happens??"
From the start with its failure to play the opening theme music and
its depiction of a weak male character with dyspraxia
One on the co-travellers. Whoopee!!
What was the last live episode of Doctor wHo you saw?
I've never seen a live episode of 'Doctor Who', Gobble-de-gook!
--
Daniel
The True Doctor wrote on 14/11/24 6:36 am:
On 13/11/2024 11:20, Daniel70 wrote:
The True Doctor wrote on 13/11/24 6:19 am:
On 12/11/2024 11:26, Daniel70 wrote:
The True Doctor wrote on 12/11/24 6:29 am:
On 11/11/2024 09:46, Daniel70 wrote:So no responce to my second situation/question??
The True Doctor wrote on 11/11/24 7:08 am:
On 10/11/2024 12:29, Blueshirt wrote:
<Snip>
Coming from somebody who was also posting here on RADW
against a female Doctor from day one (i.e. the day of and
after Jodie Whittaker's casting.) I don't know how you can
seriously claim you gave her a chance. The evidence proves
otherwise.
Of course he gave her a chance. He watched her first episode
just like over 10 million other people including myself.
Giving someone a chance don't mean you have to support and
believe in them from the very start. In fact it means the
exact opposite, not supporting or believing in them but
letting them try to persuade you otherwise.
When you watched the first 'DoctorDavid' episode, were you
thinking "This is going to be the best thing since sliced
bread" ..... or were you thinking "This could be all right,
I'll give it a go and see what happens??"
The latter.
Same Situation .... this time for 'JodieDoctor'??
You didn't provide any choice.
When you watched the first 'JodieDoctor' episode, were you thinking
"This is going to be the best thing since sliced bread" ..... or were
you thinking "This could be all right, I'll give it a go and see what
happens??"
Neither. I thought it was going to be crap from the opening second when
it didn't show the title sequence or play the theme.
"from the opening second"!! WOW!! Way to give ANY program a go, Aggy!!
From the start with its failure to play the opening theme music and
its depiction of a weak male character with dyspraxia
And I would hazard a guess that the vast majority of NEW "Doctor Who" >episodes have some sort of Story BEFORE the title sequence and theme
start up!!
Aren't 'they' allowed to show 'disabled'/'differently abled' peoples on
T.V. now-a-days??
--
Daniel
In article <vh4eh7$2o19p$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 14/11/24 2:41 am:
In article <xn0ot9kfkdl9fxp001@post.eweka.nl>,What has Idlehands lack (or otherwise) of Logic got to do with YOU, a
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Idlehands wrote:
On 2024-11-12 1:13 p.m., Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Still lokking forward to Trump arresting paedophiles
and Deep State Actors.
He'd want to start with the churches...
You wouldn't need to look too far there for some deep state
activity and cover-ups.
Binky has declared himself a full blown Trump supporter
meaning he is willing to swallow anything and everything the
MAGA movement puts out there.
Lying Idlehands lies again!
So, a British born Indian that has been exiled to Canada wants
to Make America Great Again?
Right.
Now you know Idlehands has no logic.
British born Indian that has been exiled to Canada, wanting to Make
America Great Again, Gobble-de-gook??
Idlehands has not logic otherwise he would go to
In article <vh4est$2o3tt$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 14/11/24 2:47 am:
In article <xn0ot9lj7dmpm6w007@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
<Snip>
I am giving Ncuti a chance.
Yes, you should... let's see what Christmas and the new season
in 2025 brings... I'm looking forward to it.
RTD OTOH ...
That's RTD, the guy the BBC brought in to save the show from
Chibnollocks is it?!
He is continuing the Chibnollocks legacy!
How did Moffat up RTD?
He restored Gallifrey.
Who had done away with Gallifrey, Gobble-de-gook?? JNT, maybe!!
Do you recall The End of the World?
In article <vh4fpt$2o8pe$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 14/11/24 11:46 am:
In article <xn0ot9vkfe0ddnj000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
<Snip>
Well, that's going to give "Casual viewers" something else to watch whenCasual viewers come and go with every show on television.
Everyone has the right to switch off something they don't like.
I don't think "sexual grooming" has much to do with it though.
And now Trump is in ...
'Doctor Who' isn't on!!
You would love Shetland!
The Doctor wrote on 14/11/24 11:49 pm:
In article <vh4eh7$2o19p$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 14/11/24 2:41 am:
In article <xn0ot9kfkdl9fxp001@post.eweka.nl>,What has Idlehands lack (or otherwise) of Logic got to do with YOU, a
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Idlehands wrote:
On 2024-11-12 1:13 p.m., Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Still lokking forward to Trump arresting paedophiles
and Deep State Actors.
He'd want to start with the churches...
You wouldn't need to look too far there for some deep state
activity and cover-ups.
Binky has declared himself a full blown Trump supporter
meaning he is willing to swallow anything and everything the
MAGA movement puts out there.
Lying Idlehands lies again!
So, a British born Indian that has been exiled to Canada wants
to Make America Great Again?
Right.
Now you know Idlehands has no logic.
British born Indian that has been exiled to Canada, wanting to Make
America Great Again, Gobble-de-gook??
Idlehands has not logic otherwise he would go to
*PIG'S ARSE!!*
--
Daniel
The Doctor wrote on 14/11/24 11:51 pm:
In article <vh4fpt$2o8pe$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 14/11/24 11:46 am:
In article <xn0ot9vkfe0ddnj000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
<Snip>
Well, that's going to give "Casual viewers" something else to watch when >>> 'Doctor Who' isn't on!!Casual viewers come and go with every show on television.
Everyone has the right to switch off something they don't like.
I don't think "sexual grooming" has much to do with it though.
And now Trump is in ...
You would love Shetland!
Never been there. Didn't even make it to Lock Ness when I was in Europe/U.K. >--
Daniel
In article <vh2uuh$2bjnm$2@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 13/11/2024 11:08, Daniel70 wrote:
The True Doctor wrote on 13/11/24 6:13 am:
<Snip>
Doctor Who is a MALE orientated show representing male values, the"It's time to make something for men and other people with intelligence
hero's journey, masculinity, logic, reason, and scientific thinking
and methodology triumphing over female sentiment and emotion, and
therefore appeals only to men and boys and people who are already
scientifically orientated. It's not there for a bunch of man hating
fourth wave lesbian feminist activist bigots. Virtually everything on
television today is made exclusively for non-aspirational women, and
it is totally mind-numbing for those with intelligence. It's time to
make something for men and other people with intelligence again.
again."
Does that mean Men don't have "intelligence"?? And who are these "other
people with intelligence"??
It means that men with intelligence watch Doctor Who and form the
majority of the audience. Most women don't watch Doctor Who because they
do not have the intelligence to understand it.
I am talking about real Doctor Who not the woke degeneracy that replaced it.
As in those who never recognise The Timeless Child as part of the DW Lore?
In article <vgu9ok$18l03$1@dont-email.me>,
Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:
On 2024-11-12 00:19:43 +0000, Blueshirt said:
Your Name wrote:
On 2024-11-11 16:17:54 +0000, Blueshirt said:
Your Name wrote:
The gender-swapping / ethnicity-swapping nonsense was only
fully "established" relatively recently and explicity so
that the show's makers could increase the Politically
Correct quota tickboxing. Before that there was at best
only vague hints or joking lines of dialogue.
True, but we do live in a world where, rightly or wrongly,
people can, and do, change their gender. So the BBC might
have decided they wanted their TV shows to represent the
world that people live in today.
The entertainment studios have been forced by Politically
Corerct idiots to have quotas of women, non-white people, and
disabled people in their shows. It's simply a lot cheaper and
easier for them to simply swap an existing white male
character than to actually be creative and make NEW shows and
characters. :-(
Wait until Jane Bond hits the screens one day in the future...
As long as it is a *new* character, then there's no problem. The
problem is when they hijack an existing character for idiotic
gender/ethnicity-swapping.
Bond is dead.
The True Doctor wrote on 14/11/24 6:36 am:
On 13/11/2024 11:20, Daniel70 wrote:
The True Doctor wrote on 13/11/24 6:19 am:
On 12/11/2024 11:26, Daniel70 wrote:
The True Doctor wrote on 12/11/24 6:29 am:
On 11/11/2024 09:46, Daniel70 wrote:So no responce to my second situation/question??
The True Doctor wrote on 11/11/24 7:08 am:
On 10/11/2024 12:29, Blueshirt wrote:
<Snip>
Coming from somebody who was also posting here on RADW
against a female Doctor from day one (i.e. the day of and
after Jodie Whittaker's casting.) I don't know how you can
seriously claim you gave her a chance. The evidence proves
otherwise.
Of course he gave her a chance. He watched her first episode
just like over 10 million other people including myself.
Giving someone a chance don't mean you have to support and
believe in them from the very start. In fact it means the
exact opposite, not supporting or believing in them but
letting them try to persuade you otherwise.
When you watched the first 'DoctorDavid' episode, were you
thinking "This is going to be the best thing since sliced
bread" ..... or were you thinking "This could be all right,
I'll give it a go and see what happens??"
The latter.
Same Situation .... this time for 'JodieDoctor'??
You didn't provide any choice.
When you watched the first 'JodieDoctor' episode, were you thinking
"This is going to be the best thing since sliced bread" ..... or were
you thinking "This could be all right, I'll give it a go and see what
happens??"
Neither. I thought it was going to be crap from the opening second
when it didn't show the title sequence or play the theme.
"from the opening second"!! WOW!! Way to give ANY program a go, Aggy!!
From the start with its failure to play the opening theme music and
its depiction of a weak male character with dyspraxia
And I would hazard a guess that the vast majority of NEW "Doctor Who" episodes have some sort of Story BEFORE the title sequence and theme
start up!!
Aren't 'they' allowed to show 'disabled'/'differently abled' peoples on
T.V. now-a-days??
In article <vh3d4g$2eg1k$3@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 13/11/2024 20:42, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 12/11/2024 19:58, Blueshirt wrote:
You say is, I say was... although with Ncuti Gatwa as the
current Doctor you have your male orientated show back!
Ncuti Gatwa is written as a woman that does nothing but cry
and cry and cry and acts and behaves like a slut and a whore.
I agree the emotional stuff can be a bit OTT at times, but Ncuti
Gatwa does have charisma in the role and I would like to see
more Doctor action and less crying from him in S2/15.
His highest rating episode was the one he wasn't in. No one likes him or
wants to see the sight of him.
For me, it makes sense for television shows to change and
adapt if they are going to be around for sixty years.
If its lasted for sixty years then it didn't need fixing.
Some might say Doctor Who lasted sixty years because it changed
and evolved.
No it didn't. The ratings show otherwise. It laster 54 years and that is
all.
changes in Doctor Who as the production team trying to
modernise the show... and there have been a variety of big
changes to the show's lore over the many years as producers
and script editors
The modern changes made by degenerate woke retards have
totally destroyed the show by driving away 4/5 of the audience.
If they can be driven away so easily I'd question how loyal fans
of the show they actually were.
Why should they be forced to watch degenerate woke crap the is not
written to entertain them but to sexually groom and indoctrinate childre?
You - and others - don't like a lot of the recent changes, I
get that, but you do still have the choice to switch off or
change the channel. Which I would assume is what most
sensible people do when they are watching stuff on the TV
that irritates them.
4/5 of the audience has already left. Doctor Who belongs to
the long term fans who made it the success it was and are
nearly all male, not the degenerate piece of shit woke retards
to use to propagate their vile hatred of the fans and
disseminate woke propaganda which they use to sexually groom
children.
Casual viewers come and go with every show on television.
Everyone has the right to switch off something they don't like.
I don't think "sexual grooming" has much to do with it though.
I don't not want my licence fee money being spent on sexually grooming
and indoctrinating children and neither do the majority of licence fee
payers.
A rebellion will happen?
The Doctor wrote on 14/11/24 2:47 am:
In article <xn0ot9lj7dmpm6w007@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
<Snip>
I am giving Ncuti a chance.
Yes, you should... let's see what Christmas and the new season
in 2025 brings... I'm looking forward to it.
RTD OTOH ...
That's RTD, the guy the BBC brought in to save the show from
Chibnollocks is it?!
He is continuing the Chibnollocks legacy!
How did Moffat up RTD?
He restored Gallifrey.
Who had done away with Gallifrey, Gobble-de-gook?? JNT, maybe!!
How can RTD 2 do much better?
By expanding on what we were left with, post Chibnall/JodieDoc.
Retcon the Timelesss Child!
The True Doctor wrote on 14/11/24 6:36 am:
On 13/11/2024 11:20, Daniel70 wrote:
The True Doctor wrote on 13/11/24 6:19 am:
On 12/11/2024 11:26, Daniel70 wrote:
The True Doctor wrote on 12/11/24 6:29 am:
On 11/11/2024 09:46, Daniel70 wrote:So no responce to my second situation/question??
The True Doctor wrote on 11/11/24 7:08 am:
On 10/11/2024 12:29, Blueshirt wrote:
<Snip>
Coming from somebody who was also posting here on RADW
against a female Doctor from day one (i.e. the day of and
after Jodie Whittaker's casting.) I don't know how you can
seriously claim you gave her a chance. The evidence proves
otherwise.
Of course he gave her a chance. He watched her first episode
just like over 10 million other people including myself.
Giving someone a chance don't mean you have to support and
believe in them from the very start. In fact it means the
exact opposite, not supporting or believing in them but
letting them try to persuade you otherwise.
When you watched the first 'DoctorDavid' episode, were you
thinking "This is going to be the best thing since sliced
bread" ..... or were you thinking "This could be all right,
I'll give it a go and see what happens??"
The latter.
Same Situation .... this time for 'JodieDoctor'??
You didn't provide any choice.
When you watched the first 'JodieDoctor' episode, were you thinking
"This is going to be the best thing since sliced bread" ..... or were
you thinking "This could be all right, I'll give it a go and see what
happens??"
Neither. I thought it was going to be crap from the opening second when
it didn't show the title sequence or play the theme.
"from the opening second"!! WOW!! Way to give ANY program a go, Aggy!!
From the start with its failure to play the opening theme music and
its depiction of a weak male character with dyspraxia
And I would hazard a guess that the vast majority of NEW "Doctor Who" episodes have some sort of Story BEFORE the title sequence and theme
start up!!
Aren't 'they' allowed to show 'disabled'/'differently abled' peoples on
T.V. now-a-days??
In article <vgthg2$13irq$3@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 11/11/2024 16:17, Blueshirt wrote:
Your Name wrote:
On 2024-11-10 20:46:32 +0000, Blueshirt said:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 10/11/2024 12:35, Blueshirt wrote:
In retrospect, some people might consider the casting of
Jodie Whittaker a blunder if they were unhappy with her
era once that had seen it... but they didn't know that
in July 2017.
They knew she was a woman and that the Doctor was
established as a masculine male character for over 50
years.
They also knew that it had already been established in the
show that Time Lords can change gender... following the
General and your favourite incarnation of the Master, Missy.
So the Doctor following suit wasn't a completely
revolutionary idea to fans of the show.
The way you go on about it you'd swear it had never been done
before...
The gender-swapping / ethnicity-swapping nonsense was only
fully "established" relatively recently and explicity so that
the show's makers could increase the Politically Correct quota
tickboxing. Before that there was at best only vague hints or
joking lines of dialogue.
True, but we do live in a world where, rightly or wrongly,
people can, and do, change their gender. So the BBC might have
decided they wanted their TV shows to represent the world that
people live in today.
The vast overwhelming majority of the public were not interested in that
and didn't want this shit shovelled down their throats. Donald Trump's
election as US President proves that people have had enough of
nonsensical woke garbage the goes against basic common sense.
For a fictional TV show about an alien time-traveller than can
already change their body, face, hair (etc.) I didn't have a
problem with Missy as a female Master. I actually thought
It was totally unbelievable. What happens to the unborn child if she
gets pregnant and is forced to regenerate into a man again? It's totally
stupid to go pandering to a minority of woke degenerates.
Michelle Gomez did a good job, even though her character could
quite easily have been the Rani instead, as we did already have
The why didn't they cast her to play the Rani after all the Rani was
created to be a female version of the Master, instead of insulting the
intelligence of the majority of the audience and driving them away.
a female Time Lord villain established in the show. But a
gender-swapping alien from a body-swapping one isn't a big-leap
for me in a sci-fi type of show. I am a Doctor Who fan, I just
want the stories to be good and enjoyable.
The was never any precedent for a gender swapping Time Lord for over 50
years and it should have stayed that way.
Until Gaiman's Doctor's Wife showed up.
On 14/11/2024 00:49, The Doctor wrote:
In article <vh3d4g$2eg1k$3@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 13/11/2024 20:42, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 12/11/2024 19:58, Blueshirt wrote:
You say is, I say was... although with Ncuti Gatwa as the
current Doctor you have your male orientated show back!
Ncuti Gatwa is written as a woman that does nothing but cry
and cry and cry and acts and behaves like a slut and a whore.
I agree the emotional stuff can be a bit OTT at times, but Ncuti
Gatwa does have charisma in the role and I would like to see
more Doctor action and less crying from him in S2/15.
His highest rating episode was the one he wasn't in. No one likes him or >>> wants to see the sight of him.
For me, it makes sense for television shows to change and
adapt if they are going to be around for sixty years.
If its lasted for sixty years then it didn't need fixing.
Some might say Doctor Who lasted sixty years because it changed
and evolved.
No it didn't. The ratings show otherwise. It laster 54 years and that is >>> all.
changes in Doctor Who as the production team trying to
modernise the show... and there have been a variety of big
changes to the show's lore over the many years as producers
and script editors
The modern changes made by degenerate woke retards have
totally destroyed the show by driving away 4/5 of the audience.
If they can be driven away so easily I'd question how loyal fans
of the show they actually were.
Why should they be forced to watch degenerate woke crap the is not
written to entertain them but to sexually groom and indoctrinate childre? >>>
You - and others - don't like a lot of the recent changes, I
get that, but you do still have the choice to switch off or
change the channel. Which I would assume is what most
sensible people do when they are watching stuff on the TV
that irritates them.
4/5 of the audience has already left. Doctor Who belongs to
the long term fans who made it the success it was and are
nearly all male, not the degenerate piece of shit woke retards
to use to propagate their vile hatred of the fans and
disseminate woke propaganda which they use to sexually groom
children.
Casual viewers come and go with every show on television.
Everyone has the right to switch off something they don't like.
I don't think "sexual grooming" has much to do with it though.
I don't not want my licence fee money being spent on sexually grooming
...do not...
and indoctrinating children and neither do the majority of licence fee
payers.
A rebellion will happen?
There already is one. America voted for Donald Trump in order to remove
the perverts from the education system. The degenerate far left can't
stand it.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." -William Shatner
On 14/11/2024 09:45, Daniel70 wrote:
The True Doctor wrote on 14/11/24 6:36 am:
On 13/11/2024 11:20, Daniel70 wrote:
The True Doctor wrote on 13/11/24 6:19 am:
On 12/11/2024 11:26, Daniel70 wrote:
The True Doctor wrote on 12/11/24 6:29 am:
On 11/11/2024 09:46, Daniel70 wrote:So no responce to my second situation/question??
The True Doctor wrote on 11/11/24 7:08 am:
On 10/11/2024 12:29, Blueshirt wrote:
<Snip>
Coming from somebody who was also posting here on RADW
against a female Doctor from day one (i.e. the day of and
after Jodie Whittaker's casting.) I don't know how you can >>>>>>>>>> seriously claim you gave her a chance. The evidence proves >>>>>>>>>> otherwise.
Of course he gave her a chance. He watched her first episode >>>>>>>>> just like over 10 million other people including myself.
Giving someone a chance don't mean you have to support and
believe in them from the very start. In fact it means the
exact opposite, not supporting or believing in them but
letting them try to persuade you otherwise.
When you watched the first 'DoctorDavid' episode, were you
thinking "This is going to be the best thing since sliced
bread" ..... or were you thinking "This could be all right,
I'll give it a go and see what happens??"
The latter.
Same Situation .... this time for 'JodieDoctor'??
You didn't provide any choice.
When you watched the first 'JodieDoctor' episode, were you thinking
"This is going to be the best thing since sliced bread" ..... or were
you thinking "This could be all right, I'll give it a go and see what
happens??"
Neither. I thought it was going to be crap from the opening second
when it didn't show the title sequence or play the theme.
"from the opening second"!! WOW!! Way to give ANY program a go, Aggy!!
All Chibnall needed to do was to play the opening titles and theme music >first and then he could have got at least 30 seconds of approval. But
no! The show was doomed from the very first second.
From the start with its failure to play the opening theme music and
its depiction of a weak male character with dyspraxia
And I would hazard a guess that the vast majority of NEW "Doctor Who"
episodes have some sort of Story BEFORE the title sequence and theme
start up!!
Aren't 'they' allowed to show 'disabled'/'differently abled' peoples on
T.V. now-a-days??
These disgusting child grooming perverts wouldn't know a disabled person
if one came up to them and kicked them in the balls. Look at what they
did to Davros which took disabled people's representation away.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." -William Shatner
On 14/11/2024 09:11, Daniel70 wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 14/11/24 2:47 am:
In article <xn0ot9lj7dmpm6w007@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
<Snip>
I am giving Ncuti a chance.
Yes, you should... let's see what Christmas and the new season
in 2025 brings... I'm looking forward to it.
RTD OTOH ...
That's RTD, the guy the BBC brought in to save the show from
Chibnollocks is it?!
He is continuing the Chibnollocks legacy!
How did Moffat up RTD?
He restored Gallifrey.
Who had done away with Gallifrey, Gobble-de-gook?? JNT, maybe!!
Davies and Chibnall.
How can RTD 2 do much better?
By expanding on what we were left with, post Chibnall/JodieDoc.
More like by doing completely away with it, especially the Timeless
Child monster, and starting off from when Doctor Who ended with the
Doctor hallucinating while trapped on the event horizon of a black hole
after being shot by the Cybermen.
Retcon the Timelesss Child!
Remove that vile monstrosity from canon.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." -William Shatner
On 2024-11-14 09:45:50 +0000, Daniel70 said:
The True Doctor wrote on 14/11/24 6:36 am:
On 13/11/2024 11:20, Daniel70 wrote:
The True Doctor wrote on 13/11/24 6:19 am:
On 12/11/2024 11:26, Daniel70 wrote:
The True Doctor wrote on 12/11/24 6:29 am:
On 11/11/2024 09:46, Daniel70 wrote:So no responce to my second situation/question??
The True Doctor wrote on 11/11/24 7:08 am:
On 10/11/2024 12:29, Blueshirt wrote:
<Snip>
Coming from somebody who was also posting here on RADW
against a female Doctor from day one (i.e. the day of and
after Jodie Whittaker's casting.) I don't know how you can >>>>>>>>>> seriously claim you gave her a chance. The evidence proves >>>>>>>>>> otherwise.
Of course he gave her a chance. He watched her first episode >>>>>>>>> just like over 10 million other people including myself.
Giving someone a chance don't mean you have to support and
believe in them from the very start. In fact it means the
exact opposite, not supporting or believing in them but
letting them try to persuade you otherwise.
When you watched the first 'DoctorDavid' episode, were you
thinking "This is going to be the best thing since sliced
bread" ..... or were you thinking "This could be all right,
I'll give it a go and see what happens??"
The latter.
Same Situation .... this time for 'JodieDoctor'??
You didn't provide any choice.
When you watched the first 'JodieDoctor' episode, were you thinking
"This is going to be the best thing since sliced bread" ..... or were
you thinking "This could be all right, I'll give it a go and see what
happens??"
Neither. I thought it was going to be crap from the opening second when
it didn't show the title sequence or play the theme.
"from the opening second"!! WOW!! Way to give ANY program a go, Aggy!!
From the start with its failure to play the opening theme music and
its depiction of a weak male character with dyspraxia
And I would hazard a guess that the vast majority of NEW "Doctor Who"
episodes have some sort of Story BEFORE the title sequence and theme
start up!!
Aren't 'they' allowed to show 'disabled'/'differently abled' peoples on
T.V. now-a-days??
"Allowed"?!? They *have to* have at least one disabled person on a TV
show these days. It's another of the idiotic "Political Correctness"
enforced quotas. :-\
On 12/11/2024 00:28, The Doctor wrote:
In article <vgthg2$13irq$3@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 11/11/2024 16:17, Blueshirt wrote:
Your Name wrote:
On 2024-11-10 20:46:32 +0000, Blueshirt said:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 10/11/2024 12:35, Blueshirt wrote:
In retrospect, some people might consider the casting of
Jodie Whittaker a blunder if they were unhappy with her
era once that had seen it... but they didn't know that
in July 2017.
They knew she was a woman and that the Doctor was
established as a masculine male character for over 50
years.
They also knew that it had already been established in the
show that Time Lords can change gender... following the
General and your favourite incarnation of the Master, Missy.
So the Doctor following suit wasn't a completely
revolutionary idea to fans of the show.
The way you go on about it you'd swear it had never been done
before...
The gender-swapping / ethnicity-swapping nonsense was only
fully "established" relatively recently and explicity so that
the show's makers could increase the Politically Correct quota
tickboxing. Before that there was at best only vague hints or
joking lines of dialogue.
True, but we do live in a world where, rightly or wrongly,
people can, and do, change their gender. So the BBC might have
decided they wanted their TV shows to represent the world that
people live in today.
The vast overwhelming majority of the public were not interested in that >>> and didn't want this shit shovelled down their throats. Donald Trump's
election as US President proves that people have had enough of
nonsensical woke garbage the goes against basic common sense.
For a fictional TV show about an alien time-traveller than can
already change their body, face, hair (etc.) I didn't have a
problem with Missy as a female Master. I actually thought
It was totally unbelievable. What happens to the unborn child if she
gets pregnant and is forced to regenerate into a man again? It's totally >>> stupid to go pandering to a minority of woke degenerates.
Michelle Gomez did a good job, even though her character could
quite easily have been the Rani instead, as we did already have
The why didn't they cast her to play the Rani after all the Rani was
created to be a female version of the Master, instead of insulting the
intelligence of the majority of the audience and driving them away.
a female Time Lord villain established in the show. But a
gender-swapping alien from a body-swapping one isn't a big-leap
for me in a sci-fi type of show. I am a Doctor Who fan, I just
want the stories to be good and enjoyable.
The was never any precedent for a gender swapping Time Lord for over 50
years and it should have stayed that way.
Until Gaiman's Doctor's Wife showed up.
Ah yes, Neil Gaiman. We all know about him and his perversions now don't we?
These woke degenerate hypocrites are all the same. The deviants want to >virtue signal and lecture everyone about what gender and sexuality you
should be because they all have something to hide.
https://www.tortoisemedia.com/2024/08/01/exclusive-two-more-women-accuse-neil-gaiman-of-sexual-assault-and-abuse/
https://www.theguardian.com/books/2024/sep/13/neil-gaiman-screen-adaptations-halted-after-allegations-of-sexual-misconduct
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." -William Shatner
The Doctor wrote:
In article <vh63q9$32fq4$1@dont-email.me>,and on top of all that , i win
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 12/11/2024 00:28, The Doctor wrote:
In article <vgthg2$13irq$3@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 11/11/2024 16:17, Blueshirt wrote:
Your Name wrote:
On 2024-11-10 20:46:32 +0000, Blueshirt said:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 10/11/2024 12:35, Blueshirt wrote:
In retrospect, some people might consider the casting of
Jodie Whittaker a blunder if they were unhappy with her
era once that had seen it... but they didn't know that
in July 2017.
They knew she was a woman and that the Doctor was
established as a masculine male character for over 50
years.
They also knew that it had already been established in the
show that Time Lords can change gender... following the
General and your favourite incarnation of the Master, Missy.
So the Doctor following suit wasn't a completely
revolutionary idea to fans of the show.
The way you go on about it you'd swear it had never been done
before...
The gender-swapping / ethnicity-swapping nonsense was only
fully "established" relatively recently and explicity so that
the show's makers could increase the Politically Correct quota
tickboxing. Before that there was at best only vague hints or
joking lines of dialogue.
True, but we do live in a world where, rightly or wrongly,
people can, and do, change their gender. So the BBC might have
decided they wanted their TV shows to represent the world that
people live in today.
The vast overwhelming majority of the public were not interested in that >>>>> and didn't want this shit shovelled down their throats. Donald Trump's >>>>> election as US President proves that people have had enough of
nonsensical woke garbage the goes against basic common sense.
For a fictional TV show about an alien time-traveller than can
already change their body, face, hair (etc.) I didn't have a
problem with Missy as a female Master. I actually thought
It was totally unbelievable. What happens to the unborn child if she >>>>> gets pregnant and is forced to regenerate into a man again? It's totally >>>>> stupid to go pandering to a minority of woke degenerates.
Michelle Gomez did a good job, even though her character could
quite easily have been the Rani instead, as we did already have
The why didn't they cast her to play the Rani after all the Rani was >>>>> created to be a female version of the Master, instead of insulting the >>>>> intelligence of the majority of the audience and driving them away.
a female Time Lord villain established in the show. But a
gender-swapping alien from a body-swapping one isn't a big-leap
for me in a sci-fi type of show. I am a Doctor Who fan, I just
want the stories to be good and enjoyable.
The was never any precedent for a gender swapping Time Lord for over 50 >>>>> years and it should have stayed that way.
Until Gaiman's Doctor's Wife showed up.
Ah yes, Neil Gaiman. We all know about him and his perversions now don't we?
These woke degenerate hypocrites are all the same. The deviants want to
virtue signal and lecture everyone about what gender and sexuality you
should be because they all have something to hide.
https://www.tortoisemedia.com/2024/08/01/exclusive-two-more-women-accuse-neil-gaiman-of-sexual-assault-and-abuse/
https://www.theguardian.com/books/2024/sep/13/neil-gaiman-screen-adaptations-halted-after-allegations-of-sexual-misconduct
You got my point.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw >>>
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >>> stands for." -William Shatner
The Doctor wrote on 14/11/24 11:49 pm:
In article <vh4eh7$2o19p$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 14/11/24 2:41 am:
In article <xn0ot9kfkdl9fxp001@post.eweka.nl>,What has Idlehands lack (or otherwise) of Logic got to do with YOU, a
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Idlehands wrote:
On 2024-11-12 1:13 p.m., Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Still lokking forward to Trump arresting paedophiles
and Deep State Actors.
He'd want to start with the churches...
You wouldn't need to look too far there for some deep state
activity and cover-ups.
Binky has declared himself a full blown Trump supporter
meaning he is willing to swallow anything and everything the
MAGA movement puts out there.
Lying Idlehands lies again!
So, a British born Indian that has been exiled to Canada wants
to Make America Great Again?
Right.
Now you know Idlehands has no logic.
British born Indian that has been exiled to Canada, wanting to Make
America Great Again, Gobble-de-gook??
Idlehands has not logic otherwise he would go to
*PIG'S ARSE!!*
On 2024-11-14 6:47 a.m., Daniel70 wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 14/11/24 11:49 pm:
In article <vh4eh7$2o19p$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 14/11/24 2:41 am:
What has Idlehands lack (or otherwise) of Logic got to do with YOU, aSo, a British born Indian that has been exiled to Canada wants
to Make America Great Again?
Right.
Now you know Idlehands has no logic.
British born Indian that has been exiled to Canada, wanting to Make
America Great Again, Gobble-de-gook??
Idlehands has not logic otherwise he would go to
*PIG'S ARSE!!*
Go to ????
His embracing of Trump and all he represents is somewhat amusing but demonstrates what happens when someone shuts off their brain (?) and
follow the mob.
Binky should truck on down the to States and walk into a Christian
National Church, it might open his eyes.
In article <vh4v8a$2r6ib$4@dont-email.me>, Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 14/11/24 11:51 pm:
In article <vh4fpt$2o8pe$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel70
<daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 14/11/24 11:46 am:
In article <xn0ot9vkfe0ddnj000@post.eweka.nl>, Blueshirt
<blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
<Snip>
Well, that's going to give "Casual viewers" something else toCasual viewers come and go with every show on television.
Everyone has the right to switch off something they don't
like. I don't think "sexual grooming" has much to do with
it though.
And now Trump is in ...
watch when 'Doctor Who' isn't on!!
You would love Shetland!
Never been there. Didn't even make it to Lock Ness when I was in
Europe/U.K.
You're not keping up.
Blueshirt wrote on 20/11/24 9:27 pm:
Daniel70 wrote:
We've just gotten over "Black Friday" .... Even though the
13th wasn't a Friday!!
Er... "Black Friday" is the 29th November... so it's not over
yet.
Which means there's plenty of bargains to be had...
Er... I would seem I'm mistaken. Oh, well, shit happens!!
Or the mean people, like us, who just can't be bothered.
Grinchs of the world, UNITE!!
In article <vhlk82$9bje$1@dont-email.me>,
Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:
On 2024-11-20 17:09:03 +0000, Blueshirt said:
The Doctor wrote:
The Offical black Friday and Cybermonday are coming!
It's Black Dalek Friday and Cyber-Monday.
Black Fri-Dalek and CyberMan-day :-p
Quotefile!
The Doctor wrote on 21/11/24 1:08 am:
In article <vhkc63$1q5n$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 20/11/24 3:11 am:
In article <xn0oti3x43ok55x009@post.eweka.nl>,Did YOU, Gobble-de-gook,even bother to READ that net page??
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:https://www.lsu.edu/internet/usenet/usenet-etiquette.html#:~:text=Do%20not%20post%20copyrighted%20materials,posting%20is%20a%20good%20idea.
In article <xn0oti31d3nfae0001@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0othuu93ca1ew000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
I am not my own news server but I can still filter out
people and/or posts that I don't want to see.
Guess which is more powerful? [corrected]
I don't need to guess anything. I can spell [well, sometimes]
compose sentences properly, trim quotes, use filters... as
well as having the ability to killfile somebody. So I am
happy enough with my powers.
You OTOH... run an ISP and your own news server, you don't
follow any established Usenet netiquette whatsoever... plus
you type posts like a cat walking across a keyboard. So if
you feel that's more powerful, great! Carry on then...
<rolls eyes>
So what is nettiquette?
Good behaviour guidelines, as in...respectful and appropriate
communication on the internet. As the CEO of an ISP you should
know exactly what it is. But of course, you just do your own
thing anyway.
Maybe you should e-mail this link out to your three customers...
Guidelines not standards!
Point ONE ... Read news.announce.newusers before you start posting
messages. This newsgroup will fill you in on the history of the usenet,
some of the newsgroups that are available, and the *rules* of etiquette. >>> Most of the items mentioned below are explained there.
RULES, Gobble-de-gook, not Guidelines!!
So explain September?
Well, there are groups of Days throught out the 'year' that are grouped
into 'months' and, back in the Days of "Julius Ceasar" (or
there-abouts), the Seventh of those months of the Yearly cycle was named >"September" after the seventh Roman Numeral.
Remember, back in the day, the year started with the (Northern
Hemisphere) start of Spring, the March Equinox.
--
Daniel
solar penguin wrote on 20/11/24 9:31 pm:
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:I hadn't thought about that ..... but YES!
Idlehands wrote on 20/11/24 12:50 am:And his roommate is Tim Bruening who also lives rent-free in
On 2024-11-19 3:50 a.m., Daniel70 wrote:
How deep has Idlehands gotten into Gobble-de-gooks mind??
I live rent free in that shit strewn barren wilderness he calls
a "mind". The least one could do when inviting company is clean up
and use a little air freshener.
How poor are you, Idlehands, that you NEED to live there, even rent-free?? >>
the idiot’s head!
(Now there’s an idea for an Odd Couple-style sitcom!)
--
Daniel
Daniel70 wrote:
Blueshirt wrote on 20/11/24 9:27 pm:
Daniel70 wrote:
We've just gotten over "Black Friday" .... Even though the 13th
wasn't a Friday!!
Er... "Black Friday" is the 29th November... so it's not over
yet.
Which means there's plenty of bargains to be had...
Er... I would seem I'm mistaken. Oh, well, shit happens!!
Yes, it does. Try not to make a habit of it though as you'll only end
up in the NotKnow catagory like somebody else here... and we wouldn't
want that now, would we?!
Or the mean people, like us, who just can't be bothered.Grinchs of the world, UNITE!!
Unless you've children/grandchildren in the house the only good thing
about Christmas is the two weeks off work
... but then again, you're expected to go out and visit people whilst
you're off... and if you don't, the fuckers will only arrive on...
<thinks>
I take it back, there's nothing good about Christmas...
The Doctor wrote on 21/11/24 1:11 am:
In article <vhkdph$234n$1@dont-email.me>,
solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
Idlehands wrote on 20/11/24 12:50 am:And his roommate is Tim Bruening who also lives rent-free in
On 2024-11-19 3:50 a.m., Daniel70 wrote:
How deep has Idlehands gotten into Gobble-de-gooks mind??
I live rent free in that shit strewn barren wilderness he calls
a "mind". The least one could do when inviting company is clean up >>>>> and use a little air freshener.
How poor are you, Idlehands, that you NEED to live there, even rent-free?? >>>
the idiot’s head!
(Now there’s an idea for an Odd Couple-style sitcom!)
Where on RADAR is Tim?
Sorry, Gobble-de-gook, but are YOU confusing the word "RADAR" with the
word "GAYDAR", Gobble-de-gook??
I've long thought ........!
--
Daniel
The Doctor wrote on 21/11/24 1:11 pm:
In article <xn0otjjz156078w001@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <vhkdph$234n$1@dont-email.me>,
solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
And his roommate is Tim Bruening who also lives rent-free in
the idiot’s head!
(Now there’s an idea for an Odd Couple-style sitcom!)
Where on RADAR is Tim?
Send Tim an e-mail and tell him how much you miss him. Tim's
various g-mail addresses were plastered all over Usenet once so
it should be easy enough for you to do.
Gspam? No thank you.
Why?? Can't YOUR antiquated Server get YOU there, Gobble-de-gook??
Ah!! So YOU, Gobble-de-gook, are an Atheist, are you??Mind you the victory of Donald Trump makes me rejoice at the
depression of Tim Breuning.
That's a very Christian attitude Dave... rejoicing at the
misfortune of others.
What religion teaches that one?
Atheism.
--
Daniel
Idlehands wrote on 21/11/24 12:46 am:^^^^^<-paepohile talker noted!
On 2024-11-20 3:06 a.m., Daniel70 wrote:
Idlehands wrote on 20/11/24 12:50 am:
On 2024-11-19 3:50 a.m., Daniel70 wrote:
Blueshirt wrote on 19/11/24 2:01 am:I live rent free in that shit strewn barren wilderness he calls a
The Doctor wrote:He HAS .... but still reply to him through anybody else that replies >>>>> to Idlehands. How deep has Idlehands gotten into Gobble-de-gooks mind?? >>>>
In article <vhf3fn$16dln$2@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
Idlehands wrote on 18/11/24 3:35 pm:
Poor binky, "runs" and ISP but has no clue how to thread
messages or follow a thread.
I answered his questions (through your post) but he can't
see it what a sad excuse for a Sys Admin.
Lying Idlehands lies again!
Yes, how sad!!
Don't be sad! Ban Idlehands!
RADW is a free space for all. If you don't want to read posts
from certain people, killfile them...
"mind". The least one could do when inviting company is clean up and >>>> use a little air freshener.
How poor are you, Idlehands, that you NEED to live there, even
rent-free??
It's not my choice, binky is obsessed with me in more ways than one
despite being told, very clearly, I am not interested and I don't swingBut, of course, 'we' forget that Gobble-de-gook has you kill-filed so
that way.
can't (??) read your posts, Idlehands.
--
Daniel
Blueshirt wrote on 20/11/24 9:27 pm:
Daniel70 wrote:
We've just gotten over "Black Friday" .... Even though the
13th wasn't a Friday!!
Er... "Black Friday" is the 29th November... so it's not over
yet.
Which means there's plenty of bargains to be had...
Er... I would seem I'm mistaken. Oh, well, it happens!!
Haven't seen many House Chrissy decorations around .... YET,
but it can't be long!!
There's a good few around here... people showing off and trying
to be one-up on the poor folk who don't do the outdoor stuff.
The Charity Shop I volunteer in has draged out the donated Chrissy >decorations for sale .... so people are getting some good bargains!!
Or the mean people, like us, who just can't be bothered.Grinchs of the world, UNITE!!
--
Daniel
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0otjjz156078w001@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Mind you the victory of Donald Trump makes me rejoice at the
depression of Tim Breuning.
That's a very Christian attitude Dave... rejoicing at the
misfortune of others.
What religion teaches that one?
Atheism.
You must be an atheist so... as you are quite happy to rejoice
at somebody else's depression.
If you ask me that's the true Christian fundementalist
attitude... hatred to anything that doesn't fit the [ancient]
world view according to the KJV.
Your Name wrote on 21/11/24 8:26 am:
On 2024-11-20 10:27:21 +0000, Blueshirt said:Here, our two largest Supermarket chains (something like 75-80% of sales >between them) have been under "investigation" for shonky promotions ....
Daniel70 wrote:
We've just gotten over "Black Friday" .... Even though the
13th wasn't a Friday!!
Er... "Black Friday" is the 29th November... so it's not over
yet.
"Black Friday" goes all month (if not longer). There are signs for one
business near here which say "Black Friday sale all month". :-\
Some stores have already had a "This is not Black Friday Sale", and now
started having their "Black Friday Sale" on Wednesday and will go
through to Sunday, when they'll then have their "Cyber Monday Sale" for
a week. Then it wil be the "pre-Christmas Sale", the "Christmas Sale",
the "Boxing Day Sale", the "New Year Sale", ...
Which means there's plenty of bargains to be had...
With pretty much every store having near-continuous sales, there are
very few real bargains. It's mostly just the same old everyday price
they've had for the rest of the year - they claim you're saving 20%, but
that's off the manufacturer's original recommended retail price, which
the store has never sold it for anyway, even when the product was newly
released and hasn't been sitting on store shelves for 18 months already.
like selling a product, for example, that was, last month, $5 but the
last couple of weeks was $8, but, this week, is only $4 *A 50% REDUCTION* .
Lies!! Damned Lies!! And Statistics!!
--
Daniel
The Doctor wrote on 21/11/24 1:08 am:
In article <vhkcaa$1q5n$2@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
Idlehands wrote on 20/11/24 12:50 am:
On 2024-11-19 3:50 a.m., Daniel70 wrote:
Blueshirt wrote on 19/11/24 2:01 am:
The Doctor wrote:He HAS .... but still reply to him through anybody else that replies >>>>> to Idlehands. How deep has Idlehands gotten into Gobble-de-gooks
In article <vhf3fn$16dln$2@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70Â <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
Idlehands wrote on 18/11/24 3:35 pm:
Poor binky, "runs" and ISP but has no clue how to thread
messages or follow a thread.
I answered his questions (through your post) but he can't
see it what a sad excuse for a Sys Admin.
Lying Idlehands lies again!
Yes, how sad!!
Don't be sad! Ban Idlehands!
RADW is a free space for all. If you don't want to read posts
from certain people, killfile them...
mind??
I live rent free in that shit strewn barren wilderness he calls a
"mind". The least one could do when inviting company is clean up and >>>> use a little air freshener.
How poor are you, Idlehands, that you NEED to live there, even rent-
free??
Lying Idlehands claims to work for an essential service.
Wherever he works, I'm betting he does more actual work than YOU do, Gobble-de-gook!!
Blueshirt wrote on 21/11/24 9:25 pm:
Daniel70 wrote:
Blueshirt wrote on 20/11/24 9:27 pm:
Daniel70 wrote:
We've just gotten over "Black Friday" .... Even though the 13th
wasn't a Friday!!
Er... "Black Friday" is the 29th November... so it's not over
yet.
Which means there's plenty of bargains to be had...
Er... I would seem I'm mistaken. Oh, well, shit happens!!
Yes, it does. Try not to make a habit of it though as you'll only end
up in the NotKnow catagory like somebody else here... and we wouldn't
want that now, would we?!
Or the mean people, like us, who just can't be bothered.Grinchs of the world, UNITE!!
Unless you've children/grandchildren in the house the only good thing
about Christmas is the two weeks off work
Being unemployed/Pensioned Off, that doesn't really matter to me ....
but "two weeks off"?? Here in Australia, four weeks annual leave is
standard .... most of which is taken in December/January/Summer!!
... but then again, you're expected to go out and visit people whilst--
you're off... and if you don't, the fuckers will only arrive on...
<thinks>
I take it back, there's nothing good about Christmas...
Daniel
If you ask me that's the true Christian fundementalist
attitude... hatred to anything that doesn't fit the [ancient]
world view according to the KJV.
IYIO! Long live the Paisleys!
In article <vhmupk$j6cl$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
Ah!! So YOU, Gobble-de-gook, are an Atheist, are you??
Nope and Anti-Papist!
On 2024-11-21 2:37 a.m., Daniel70 wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 21/11/24 1:08 am:
Lying Idlehands claims to work for an essential service.
Wherever he works, I'm betting he does more actual work than
YOU do, Gobble-de-gook!!
I never said my work was "essential", I said binky would crap
his pants if he did know where I work.
The Doctor wrote:
In article <vhmupk$j6cl$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
Ah!! So YOU, Gobble-de-gook, are an Atheist, are you??
Nope and Anti-Papist!
Anti-something? Of course you are... that's your Christian way
isn't it?
So much for being kind to one another, forgiving one another (as
your god forgave you), loving your enemies and being good... etc.
Whoever taught you your religion didn't really do a good job,
did they?
The Doctor wrote:
If you ask me that's the true Christian fundementalist
attitude... hatred to anything that doesn't fit the [ancient]
world view according to the KJV.
IYIO! Long live the Paisleys!
And that is supposed to bother me is it? <rolls eyes>
Daddy is burning in his hell, whilst sonny is in purgatory after
being dumped by his electorate. - They are about as relevant to
us here in 2024 as the NotKnow internet company is to Alaskans
in igloos...
In article <xn0otkual6fqbbb001@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Nope and Anti-Papist!
Anti-something? Of course you are... that's your Christian
way isn't it?
The Pope does not represent Christianity.
So much for being kind to one another, forgiving one another
(as your god forgave you), loving your enemies and being
good... etc.
Apologies from the Holy See first.
In article <xn0otkui86g1c41002@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Long live the Paisleys!
And that is supposed to bother me is it? <rolls eyes>
Daddy is burning in his hell, whilst sonny is in purgatory
after being dumped by his electorate. - They are about as
relevant to us here in 2024 as the NotKnow internet company
is to Alaskans in igloos...
Imagne a United Ireland under the Paisleys!
The Doctor wrote:
In article <vhlk6b$9bj1$1@dont-email.me>,
Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:
We don't bother with Christmas. It's really just a
merchandising scam to buy toys for kids.
Pagan / Atheist for you!
That's right, because that's exactly where all these "Christmas"
traditions came from... you surely don't think that the fir
trees, snow, yule log and holly bushes come from Jerusalem or
Nazareth do you?
Or maybe you do...
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0otkui86g1c41002@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Long live the Paisleys!
And that is supposed to bother me is it? <rolls eyes>
Daddy is burning in his hell, whilst sonny is in purgatory
after being dumped by his electorate. - They are about as
relevant to us here in 2024 as the NotKnow internet company
is to Alaskans in igloos...
Imagne a United Ireland under the Paisleys!
Even better... imagine a united Ireland under ME!!!
On 2024-11-21 10:04:26 +0000, Blueshirt said:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <vhlk6b$9bj1$1@dont-email.me>,
Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:
We don't bother with Christmas. It's really just a
merchandising scam to buy toys for kids.
Pagan / Atheist for you!
That's right, because that's exactly where all these "Christmas"
traditions came from... you surely don't think that the fir
trees, snow, yule log and holly bushes come from Jerusalem or
Nazareth do you?
Or maybe you do...
All the so-called Christian holidays are just earlier pagan
celebrations that have been stolen and re-worked by the greedy con-men
in the church. Just one of the many many many reasons why religions are
just a load of claptrap bollocks peddled by lying con-artists and
believed by blinkered fools. :-)
In article<xn0otkual6fqbbb001@post.eweka.nl>,And I'm quite sure that many faithful Christian believers are
Blueshirt<blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:The Pope does not represent Christianity.
Nope and Anti-Papist!Anti-something? Of course you are... that's your Christian
way isn't it?
damn glad that YOU don't!!!
So much for being kind to one another, forgiving one another
(as your god forgave you), loving your enemies and being
good... etc.
Idlehands wrote:
On 2024-11-21 2:37 a.m., Daniel70 wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 21/11/24 1:08 am:
Lying Idlehands claims to work for an essential service.
Wherever he works, I'm betting he does more actual work than
YOU do, Gobble-de-gook!!
I never said my work was "essential", I said binky would crap
his pants if he did know where I work.
Don't tell me you run a rival ISP that actually HAS customers?!
I told him years ago he should move away from dial-up modems...
but what can you do? <shrugs>
The True Doctor wrote:
On 06/11/2024 17:59, solar penguin wrote:
“Like sewage and smartphones and Donald Trump, some things
are just inevitable.” - The 12th Doctor
And you wonder why his ratings reached the lowest level ever.
Until Whittaker and Gatwa respectively pissed off fans even
more.
I wouldn't blame the actors myself. If there are any problems
with modern Who it's more to do with the production than
anything else. In Jodie Whittaker's case a lot of people just
didn't give her a chance from day one becasue she was a female
Doctor. Whilst Ncuti Gatwa is a really good actor but the 15th
Doctor has been written like an emotional pussy.
The True Doctor wrote:
On 06/11/2024 17:59, solar penguin wrote:
“Like sewage and smartphones and Donald Trump, some things
are just inevitable.” - The 12th Doctor
And you wonder why his ratings reached the lowest level ever.
Until Whittaker and Gatwa respectively pissed off fans even
more.
I wouldn't blame the actors myself. If there are any problems
with modern Who it's more to do with the production than
anything else. In Jodie Whittaker's case a lot of people just
didn't give her a chance from day one becasue she was a female
Doctor.
Whilst Ncuti Gatwa is a really good actor but the 15th
Doctor has been written like an emotional pussy.
The Doctor wrote:
In article <vgjc1e$2qq4b$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 06/11/2024 17:59, solar penguin wrote:
“Like sewage and smartphones and Donald Trump, some things
are just inevitable.” - The 12th Doctor
And you wonder why his ratings reached the lowest level
ever. Until Whittaker and Gatwa respectively pissed off fans
even more.
chibnall/Whittakers Adventures of the Timeless Child
is a real low point!
Are you still going on about the Timeless Child?!
Get over it and move on... Christmas is coming and the 15th
Doctor will be back!
Blueshirt wrote on 7/11/24 9:10 pm:
Daniel70 wroteQuote
The Doctor wrote on 7/11/24 3:19 am:
A CAT with CATaracts!!
I have 3 cats! The oldest on suffers from cataracts.
It's not as much of a catastrophe as it would be for a cat these
days, modern vets have up to date equipment that can cater for
anything.
It's not as much of a CATastrophe as it would be for a CAT these
days, modern vets have up to date equipment that can CATer for
anything.
End Quote
That was deliberate, wasn't it, Blueshirt??
--
Daniel
solar penguin wrote on 7/11/24 8:05 pm:
Idlehands informed us:Maybe that's why his parents keep him in the Basement .... so he doesn't
On 2024-11-06 7:21 a.m., Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Tim did say his older girlfirnd left him a cat while she moved
out of state.
The cat wouldn't care... as long as somebody fed it.
Binky's cats took over most of his basement hideaway, they
left him the litter box to hang out with.
Binky is toilet trained enough to use a litter box??? Wow!
I thought he just soiled his pants and didn’t even notice!
have to wear any pants at all!!
Now, there's a sight NOT for sore eyes!!
--
Daniel
Daniel70 wrote:
Blueshirt wrote on 7/11/24 9:10 pm:
Daniel70 wroteQuote
The Doctor wrote on 7/11/24 3:19 am:
A CAT with CATaracts!!
I have 3 cats! The oldest on suffers from cataracts.
It's not as much of a catastrophe as it would be for a cat
these days, modern vets have up to date equipment that can
cater for anything.
It's not as much of a CATastrophe as it would be for a CAT
these days, modern vets have up to date equipment that can
CATer for anything.
End Quote
That was deliberate, wasn't it, Blueshirt??
Of course.
It was tea time.. and I was bored.
African Americans will naming their children after
him like they have done in the past after previous
great presidents. Has Elon kept the tradition alive
by fathering a Donald Musk yet?
On 08/11/2024 09:14, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 06/11/2024 17:59, solar penguin wrote:
“Like sewage and smartphones and Donald Trump, some things
are just inevitable.” - The 12th Doctor
And you wonder why his ratings reached the lowest level ever.
Until Whittaker and Gatwa respectively pissed off fans even
more.
I wouldn't blame the actors myself. If there are any problems
with modern Who it's more to do with the production than
anything else. In Jodie Whittaker's case a lot of people just
didn't give her a chance from day one becasue she was a female
Doctor. Whilst Ncuti Gatwa is a really good actor but the 15th
Doctor has been written like an emotional pussy.
Whittaker was totally miscast anyone with any sense knew she didn't have
the acting ability or range for the part and neither does Gatwa.
There was nothing wrong with Capaldi's acting ability. It's was down to
woke writing that the series died, like insulting the greatest American >president of all time (according to Donald Trump himself). African
Americans will naming their children after him like they have done in
the past after previous great presidents. Has Elon kept the tradition
alive by fathering a Donald Musk yet?
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." -William Shatner
In article <xn0ot2d01w81p0001@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
chibnall/Whittakers Adventures of the Timeless Child
is a real low point!
Are you still going on about the Timeless Child?!
Get over it and move on... Christmas is coming and the 15th
Doctor will be back!
The REAL 14th you mean.
In article <xn0ot2clhvmz4e000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
And you wonder why his ratings reached the lowest level
ever. Until Whittaker and Gatwa respectively pissed off
fans even more.
I wouldn't blame the actors myself. If there are any problems
with modern Who it's more to do with the production than
anything else. In Jodie Whittaker's case a lot of people just
didn't give her a chance from day one becasue she was a
female Doctor.
The Timeless Children really caused a heavy backlash to this
day.
Whilst Ncuti Gatwa is a really good actor but the 15th
Doctor has been written like an emotional pussy.
and badly written.
The True Doctor wrote:
African Americans will naming their children after
him like they have done in the past after previous
great presidents. Has Elon kept the tradition alive
by fathering a Donald Musk yet?
No, but Elon Musk is the father of a child called Tau Techno
Mechanicus Musk as well as one named X Æ A-Xii Musk... so I
reckon he'd find Donald a bit on the plain side!
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0ot2d01w81p0001@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
chibnall/Whittakers Adventures of the Timeless Child
is a real low point!
Are you still going on about the Timeless Child?!
Get over it and move on... Christmas is coming and the 15th
Doctor will be back!
The REAL 14th you mean.
No Dave, I don't... and neither does anybody else, as we all
know that Ncuti Gatwa is officially the 15th Doctor. Nothing you
say or do is going to change that.
But you have just clarified for everybody why your internet
company is called NotKnow... as you know nothing!!!
In article <xn0ot2l6s17cqe2000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
African Americans will naming their children after
him like they have done in the past after previous
great presidents. Has Elon kept the tradition alive
by fathering a Donald Musk yet?
No, but Elon Musk is the father of a child called Tau Techno
Mechanicus Musk as well as one named X Æ A-Xii Musk... so I
reckon he'd find Donald a bit on the plain side!
If he can get a woman pregnant again.
The idiot insisted:
In article <xn0ot2l6s17cqe2000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
Has Elon kept the tradition alive
by fathering a Donald Musk yet?
No, but Elon Musk is the father of a child called Tau Techno
Mechanicus Musk as well as one named X Æ A-Xii Musk... so I
reckon he'd find Donald a bit on the plain side!
If he can get a woman pregnant again.
He’s got a better chance than you (or me)
--
solar penguin
On 08/11/2024 15:47, The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0ot2l6s17cqe2000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
African Americans will naming their children after
him like they have done in the past after previous
great presidents. Has Elon kept the tradition alive
by fathering a Donald Musk yet?
No, but Elon Musk is the father of a child called Tau Techno
Mechanicus Musk as well as one named X Æ A-Xii Musk... so I
reckon he'd find Donald a bit on the plain side!
If he can get a woman pregnant again.
Obviously he's never going to get a man pregnant.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." -William Shatner
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0ot2clhvmz4e000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
And you wonder why his ratings reached the lowest level
ever. Until Whittaker and Gatwa respectively pissed off
fans even more.
I wouldn't blame the actors myself. If there are any problems
with modern Who it's more to do with the production than
anything else. In Jodie Whittaker's case a lot of people just
didn't give her a chance from day one becasue she was a
female Doctor.
The Timeless Children really caused a heavy backlash to this
day.
No Dave, people like you were against the 13th Doctor from the
start. The Timeless Child had nothing to do with it. (It didn't
help, obviously, but it wasn't the start of the fan unrest.)
Check back on all the comments online following Jodie
Whittaker's casting. Some fans were against it from day one.
Whilst Ncuti Gatwa is a really good actor but the 15th
Doctor has been written like an emotional pussy.
and badly written.
I would say, the 15th Doctor has not been written as good as he
could be or what an actor the quality of Ncuti Gatwa deserves.
However, if your idea of a Doctor Who 'monster' to launch a new
series of the show, with a brand new Doctor and companion, is
called the "Bogeyman" - because he is made out of bogeys - then
clearly you are aiming your writing at an audience of six year
olds, or people with an equivalent mental age. For me, Ncuti
deserved better.
On 08/11/2024 14:59, Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
The Timeless Children really caused a heavy backlash to
this day.
No Dave, people like you were against the 13th Doctor from
the start. The Timeless Child had nothing to do with it. (It
didn't help, obviously, but it wasn't the start of the fan
unrest.) Check back on all the comments online following
Jodie Whittaker's casting. Some fans were against it from
day one.
Cut the stupid and crappy fake news.
The True Doctor wrote:
On 08/11/2024 14:59, Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
The Timeless Children really caused a heavy backlash to
this day.
No Dave, people like you were against the 13th Doctor from
the start. The Timeless Child had nothing to do with it. (It
didn't help, obviously, but it wasn't the start of the fan
unrest.) Check back on all the comments online following
Jodie Whittaker's casting. Some fans were against it from
day one.
Cut the stupid and crappy fake news.
Oh dear... looks like your memory is failing you. There's
nothing fake about my comments, maybe you should stand by some
of your own... (Note to AGA, I have the RADW archive back to
2003 on my PC)
For instance. I wonder who could have been responsible for this
lovely post? Hmmm...
-------------------------------------------------------
Thread title: The Case to sack Chris Chibnall.
Date: 18th July 2017
[Note: Jodie Whittaker's casting announcment was 16th July 2017]
Chris Chibnall must explain his rationale behind the choice of a
female Doctor and explain how this is going to attract and keep
male viewers, especially ones under the age of puberty, and get
women to watch the show.
Firstly the majority of women are not impressed with the idea of
a female Doctor. 3/4 of them are not into science fiction and of
those that are the majority only watch it because they fancy the
lead protagonist because he's a man. Since half have expressed
that they will stop watching, this leaves the show appealing to
1/8 of women viewers, and half of those probably won't watch
unless there's a credible romance, leaving 1/16.
No boy under the age of puberty is going to be impressed by the
choice of a female Doctor and they will no watch the show
period. They want a strong male role model to identify with
their father, not a woman to substitute for their mother, or a
girlfriend.
That just leaves male viewers over the age of 13. Half of them
are not going to watch from the start. Of the remaining half
they will only watch if they fancy the lead actress.
Blah Blah Blah... [it goes on]
-------------------------------------------------
First, any claims that you were not against Jodie Whittaker from
day one are BULLSHIT. As proven by your own posts to RADW.
Secondly, you hadn't seen Jodie's first episode as the Doctor in
July 2017, so you were completly unable to rationally judge her
performance as the 13th Doctor. You're are right though, to you
she was miscast as the Doctor, because she was a female. You
made this point clear enough.
More importantly... IT HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH THE TIMELESS
CHILD. In July 2017 nobody in fandom knew anything about the
Timeless Child.
You can have your opinions, like us all, but cut the bullshit.
You were against Jodie Whittaker's Doctor as she was a female.
Full stop.
If you'd like me to repost some of your old messages on this
issue, no problem. But it started at the very beginning, not
after you'd seen any of her episodes... and before any Timeless
Child mention.
Own it.
On 08/11/2024 16:49, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 08/11/2024 14:59, Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
The Timeless Children really caused a heavy backlash to
this day.
No Dave, people like you were against the 13th Doctor
from the start. The Timeless Child had nothing to do
with it. (It didn't help, obviously, but it wasn't the
start of the fan unrest.) Check back on all the comments
online following Jodie Whittaker's casting. Some fans
were against it from day one.
Cut the stupid and crappy fake news.
Oh dear... looks like your memory is failing you. There's
nothing fake about my comments, maybe you should stand by
some of your own... (Note to AGA, I have the RADW archive
back to 2003 on my PC)
For instance. I wonder who could have been responsible for
this lovely post? Hmmm...
There's nothing wrong with my post. Anyone with any modicum of
common sense would have asked exactly the same questions that
I did.
Just because someone don't agree with your stupid retarded
woke views doesn't mean that they are wrong or unjustified.
First, any claims that you were not against Jodie Whittaker
from day one are BULLSHIT. As proven by your own posts to
RADW.
They are not bullshit. They are everyday common sense. The
Doctor is a MALE character. How the hell do you expect a MALE
character, someone who thinks, acts, behaves, and live their
lives in the manner of a man, to be played by a woman? If the
Doctor isn't male then how can they be the same character?
If you'd like me to repost some of your old messages on this
issue, no problem. But it started at the very beginning, not
after you'd seen any of her episodes... and before any
Timeless Child mention. Own it.
Whittaker was given a chance and she failed. I am perfectly
entitled to point out what I thought would lead to that
failure even before the first episode.
Despite that The Timeless Child monster destroyed the series
completely, and that happened from the very second episode
when the monster was first introduced.
People can get over Whittaker, but they can never get over the
damage done by the monstrosity of the Timeless Child.
The idiot insisted:
In article <xn0ot2l6s17cqe2000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
Has Elon kept the tradition alive
by fathering a Donald Musk yet?
No, but Elon Musk is the father of a child called Tau Techno
Mechanicus Musk as well as one named X Æ A-Xii Musk... so I
reckon he'd find Donald a bit on the plain side!
If he can get a woman pregnant again.
He’s got a better chance than you (or me)
The Doctor wrote:
In article <vgkmk1$356ir$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
Blueshirt wrote on 7/11/24 9:10 pm:
Daniel70 wrote
A CAT with CATaracts!!
It's not as much of a catastrophe as it would be for a cat
these days, modern vets have up to date equipment that can
cater for anything.
Quote
It's not as much of a CATastrophe as it would be for a CAT
these days, modern vets have up to date equipment that can
CATer for anything.
End Quote
That was deliberate, wasn't it, Blueshirt??
humour.
Yes Dave, you should try it sometime...
ΓÇ£Like sewage and smartphones and Donald Trump, some things
are just inevitable.ΓÇ¥ - The 12th Doctor
On 08/11/2024 14:59, Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0ot2clhvmz4e000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
And you wonder why his ratings reached the lowest level
ever. Until Whittaker and Gatwa respectively pissed off
fans even more.
I wouldn't blame the actors myself. If there are any problems
with modern Who it's more to do with the production than
anything else. In Jodie Whittaker's case a lot of people just
didn't give her a chance from day one becasue she was a
female Doctor.
The Timeless Children really caused a heavy backlash to this
day.
No Dave, people like you were against the 13th Doctor from the
start. The Timeless Child had nothing to do with it. (It didn't
help, obviously, but it wasn't the start of the fan unrest.)
Check back on all the comments online following Jodie
Whittaker's casting. Some fans were against it from day one.
Cut the stupid and crappy fake news. Whittaker got over 10 million
viewers for her first episode and then it all went down the toiler.
Everyone gave her a chance. She was a talentless actress who was only
cast because of her gender and had already worked for Chibnall instead
of being the best person for the job and the degenerate woke writing
totally destroyed the show, especially the Timeless Child monster.
Whilst Ncuti Gatwa is a really good actor but the 15th
Doctor has been written like an emotional pussy.
and badly written.
I would say, the 15th Doctor has not been written as good as he
could be or what an actor the quality of Ncuti Gatwa deserves.
However, if your idea of a Doctor Who 'monster' to launch a new
series of the show, with a brand new Doctor and companion, is
called the "Bogeyman" - because he is made out of bogeys - then
clearly you are aiming your writing at an audience of six year
olds, or people with an equivalent mental age. For me, Ncuti
deserved better.
He's aiming for an audience of infantile degenerate woketards like the
ones that voted for Kamala Harris who she constantly talked down to like >children and then they started balling their eyes out when Donald Trump
was elected president for the second time by the majority of the US >electorate who have more intelligence.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." -William Shatner
The True Doctor wrote:
On 08/11/2024 14:59, Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
The Timeless Children really caused a heavy backlash to
this day.
No Dave, people like you were against the 13th Doctor from
the start. The Timeless Child had nothing to do with it. (It
didn't help, obviously, but it wasn't the start of the fan
unrest.) Check back on all the comments online following
Jodie Whittaker's casting. Some fans were against it from
day one.
Cut the stupid and crappy fake news.
Oh dear... looks like your memory is failing you. There's
nothing fake about my comments, maybe you should stand by some
of your own... (Note to AGA, I have the RADW archive back to
2003 on my PC)
For instance. I wonder who could have been responsible for this
lovely post? Hmmm...
-------------------------------------------------------
Thread title: The Case to sack Chris Chibnall.
Date: 18th July 2017
[Note: Jodie Whittaker's casting announcment was 16th July 2017]
Chris Chibnall must explain his rationale behind the choice of a
female Doctor and explain how this is going to attract and keep
male viewers, especially ones under the age of puberty, and get
women to watch the show.
Firstly the majority of women are not impressed with the idea of
a female Doctor. 3/4 of them are not into science fiction and of
those that are the majority only watch it because they fancy the
lead protagonist because he's a man. Since half have expressed
that they will stop watching, this leaves the show appealing to
1/8 of women viewers, and half of those probably won't watch
unless there's a credible romance, leaving 1/16.
No boy under the age of puberty is going to be impressed by the
choice of a female Doctor and they will no watch the show
period. They want a strong male role model to identify with
their father, not a woman to substitute for their mother, or a
girlfriend.
That just leaves male viewers over the age of 13. Half of them
are not going to watch from the start. Of the remaining half
they will only watch if they fancy the lead actress.
Blah Blah Blah... [it goes on]
-------------------------------------------------
First, any claims that you were not against Jodie Whittaker from
day one are BULLS*T. As proven by your own posts to RADW.
Secondly, you hadn't seen Jodie's first episode as the Doctor in
July 2017, so you were completly unable to rationally judge her
performance as the 13th Doctor. You're are right though, to you
she was miscast as the Doctor, because she was a female. You
made this point clear enough.
More importantly... IT HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH THE TIMELESS
CHILD. In July 2017 nobody in fandom knew anything about the
Timeless Child.
You can have your opinions, like us all, but cut the bullshit.
You were against Jodie Whittaker's Doctor as she was a female.
Full stop.
If you'd like me to repost some of your old messages on this
issue, no problem. But it started at the very beginning, not
after you'd seen any of her episodes... and before any Timeless
Child mention.
Own it.
On 08/11/2024 16:49, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 08/11/2024 14:59, Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
The Timeless Children really caused a heavy backlash to
this day.
No Dave, people like you were against the 13th Doctor from
the start. The Timeless Child had nothing to do with it. (It
didn't help, obviously, but it wasn't the start of the fan
unrest.) Check back on all the comments online following
Jodie Whittaker's casting. Some fans were against it from
day one.
Cut the stupid and crappy fake news.
Oh dear... looks like your memory is failing you. There's
nothing fake about my comments, maybe you should stand by some
of your own... (Note to AGA, I have the RADW archive back to
2003 on my PC)
For instance. I wonder who could have been responsible for this
lovely post? Hmmm...
There's nothing wrong with my post. Anyone with any modicum of common
sense would have asked exactly the same questions that I did.
Just because someone don't agree with your stupid retarded woke views
doesn't mean that they are wrong or unjustified.
-------------------------------------------------------
Thread title: The Case to sack Chris Chibnall.
Date: 18th July 2017
[Note: Jodie Whittaker's casting announcment was 16th July 2017]
Chris Chibnall must explain his rationale behind the choice of a
female Doctor and explain how this is going to attract and keep
male viewers, especially ones under the age of puberty, and get
women to watch the show.
Firstly the majority of women are not impressed with the idea of
a female Doctor. 3/4 of them are not into science fiction and of
those that are the majority only watch it because they fancy the
lead protagonist because he's a man. Since half have expressed
that they will stop watching, this leaves the show appealing to
1/8 of women viewers, and half of those probably won't watch
unless there's a credible romance, leaving 1/16.
No boy under the age of puberty is going to be impressed by the
choice of a female Doctor and they will no watch the show
period. They want a strong male role model to identify with
their father, not a woman to substitute for their mother, or a
girlfriend.
That just leaves male viewers over the age of 13. Half of them
are not going to watch from the start. Of the remaining half
they will only watch if they fancy the lead actress.
Blah Blah Blah... [it goes on]
-------------------------------------------------
First, any claims that you were not against Jodie Whittaker from
day one are BULLSHIT. As proven by your own posts to RADW.
They are not bullshit. They are everyday common sense. The Doctor is a
MALE character. How the hell do you expect a MALE character, someone who >thinks, acts, behaves, and live their lives in the manner of a man, to
be played by a woman? If the Doctor isn't male then how can they be the
same character?
Secondly, you hadn't seen Jodie's first episode as the Doctor in
I'd seen the crap that she'd previously appeared in and knew from that
that she was a week talentless actress unsuitable for the role and I was >proven right. Jo Martin did a better job at playing the Doctor in 15
minutes that Whittaker ever did in 3 entire series and a couple of
specials.
July 2017, so you were completly unable to rationally judge her
performance as the 13th Doctor. You're are right though, to you
she was miscast as the Doctor, because she was a female. You
made this point clear enough.
The Doctor is a MALE character. On top of her lack of acting skills,
stage presence, gravitas, and charisma, the fact that she was a woman
that was cast to play a MALE character was the biggest factor ruling her
out for playing the role.
More importantly... IT HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH THE TIMELESS
CHILD. In July 2017 nobody in fandom knew anything about the
Timeless Child.
The Timeless Child monster killed off the entire series from the very
second episode immediately after over 10 million people including myself
had given Whittaker the chance to prove herself. Without the Timeless
Child monster both Whittaker and Gatwa could have been endured.
You can have your opinions, like us all, but cut the bullshit.
You were against Jodie Whittaker's Doctor as she was a female.
Full stop.
Why should I have supported her? It was a totally stupid gimmick that
any intelligent writer would have called out immediately.
If you'd like me to repost some of your old messages on this
issue, no problem. But it started at the very beginning, not
after you'd seen any of her episodes... and before any Timeless
Child mention.
Own it.
Whittaker was given a chance and she failed. I am perfectly entitled to
point out what I thought would lead to that failure even before the
first episode.
Despite that The Timeless Child monster destroyed the series completely,
and that happened from the very second episode when the monster was
first introduced.
People can get over Whittaker, but they can never get over the damage
done by the monstrosity of the Timeless Child.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." -William Shatner
On 2024-11-08 14:44:14 +0000, Blueshirt said:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <vgkmk1$356ir$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
Blueshirt wrote on 7/11/24 9:10 pm:
Daniel70 wrote
A CAT with CATaracts!!
It's not as much of a catastrophe as it would be for a cat
these days, modern vets have up to date equipment that can
cater for anything.
Quote
It's not as much of a CATastrophe as it would be for a CAT
these days, modern vets have up to date equipment that can
CATer for anything.
End Quote
That was deliberate, wasn't it, Blueshirt??
humour.
Yes Dave, you should try it sometime...
He probably didn't catch all the puns scattered through the post, so he
may need yet more education to be able to locate and catalogue such
things in the future. ;-)
On 2024-11-08 16:06:14 +0000, solar penguin said:
The idiot insisted:
In article <xn0ot2l6s17cqe2000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
Has Elon kept the tradition alive
by fathering a Donald Musk yet?
No, but Elon Musk is the father of a child called Tau Techno
Mechanicus Musk as well as one named X Æ A-Xii Musk... so I
reckon he'd find Donald a bit on the plain side!
If he can get a woman pregnant again.
He’s got a better chance than you (or me)
A "woman", no.
A "selfish gold-digger willing to do anything for money", yes. :-p
The True Doctor wrote:
On 08/11/2024 16:49, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 08/11/2024 14:59, Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
The Timeless Children really caused a heavy backlash to
this day.
No Dave, people like you were against the 13th Doctor
from the start. The Timeless Child had nothing to do
with it. (It didn't help, obviously, but it wasn't the
start of the fan unrest.) Check back on all the comments
online following Jodie Whittaker's casting. Some fans
were against it from day one.
Cut the stupid and crappy fake news.
Oh dear... looks like your memory is failing you. There's
nothing fake about my comments, maybe you should stand by
some of your own... (Note to AGA, I have the RADW archive
back to 2003 on my PC)
For instance. I wonder who could have been responsible for
this lovely post? Hmmm...
There's nothing wrong with my post. Anyone with any modicum of
common sense would have asked exactly the same questions that
I did.
So what I said wasn't fake news then, was it? People, like you
and Dave, were against a female Doctor from the beginning. So
much so, you were putting forward a case for Chris Chibnall to
be sacked the day after Jodie Whittaker's casting...
That was my point, so why try and make out otherwise? It had
nothing to do with Jodie's first episode or the Timeless Child
arc.
Just because someone don't agree with your stupid retarded
woke views doesn't mean that they are wrong or unjustified.
I was pointing out your bullshit and revisionism. Not liking the
Timeless Child is fine... I didn't like it much either.
First, any claims that you were not against Jodie Whittaker
from day one are BULLSHIT. As proven by your own posts to
RADW.
They are not bullshit. They are everyday common sense. The
Doctor is a MALE character. How the hell do you expect a MALE
character, someone who thinks, acts, behaves, and live their
lives in the manner of a man, to be played by a woman? If the
Doctor isn't male then how can they be the same character?
As you know, a Time-Lord is a fictional alien that can change
their face and gender... as established in the show before Chris
Chibnall and Jodie Whittaker came along.
If you'd like me to repost some of your old messages on this
issue, no problem. But it started at the very beginning, not
after you'd seen any of her episodes... and before any
Timeless Child mention. Own it.
Whittaker was given a chance and she failed. I am perfectly
entitled to point out what I thought would lead to that
failure even before the first episode.
Despite that The Timeless Child monster destroyed the series
completely, and that happened from the very second episode
when the monster was first introduced.
People can get over Whittaker, but they can never get over the
damage done by the monstrosity of the Timeless Child.
As I said, some people were against Jodie Whittaker's casting
from day one just because she was a woman. Those people are
entitled to their views but trying to pretend it was because
Jodie didn't play the character well or it was because of the
eventuality that became the Timeless Child is historical
revisionism, aka BULL*IT.
The True Doctor wrote:
On 08/11/2024 16:49, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 08/11/2024 14:59, Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
The Timeless Children really caused a heavy backlash to
this day.
No Dave, people like you were against the 13th Doctor
from the start. The Timeless Child had nothing to do
with it. (It didn't help, obviously, but it wasn't the
start of the fan unrest.) Check back on all the comments
online following Jodie Whittaker's casting. Some fans
were against it from day one.
Cut the stupid and crappy fake news.
Oh dear... looks like your memory is failing you. There's
nothing fake about my comments, maybe you should stand by
some of your own... (Note to AGA, I have the RADW archive
back to 2003 on my PC)
For instance. I wonder who could have been responsible for
this lovely post? Hmmm...
There's nothing wrong with my post. Anyone with any modicum of
common sense would have asked exactly the same questions that
I did.
So what I said wasn't fake news then, was it? People, like you
and Dave, were against a female Doctor from the beginning. So
much so, you were putting forward a case for Chris Chibnall to
be sacked the day after Jodie Whittaker's casting...
That was my point, so why try and make out otherwise? It had
nothing to do with Jodie's first episode or the Timeless Child
arc.
Just because someone don't agree with your stupid retarded
woke views doesn't mean that they are wrong or unjustified.
I was pointing out your bullshit and revisionism. Not liking the
Timeless Child is fine... I didn't like it much either.
First, any claims that you were not against Jodie Whittaker
from day one are BULLSHIT. As proven by your own posts to
RADW.
They are not bullshit. They are everyday common sense. The
Doctor is a MALE character. How the hell do you expect a MALE
character, someone who thinks, acts, behaves, and live their
lives in the manner of a man, to be played by a woman? If the
Doctor isn't male then how can they be the same character?
As you know, a Time-Lord is a fictional alien that can change
their face and gender... as established in the show before Chris
Chibnall and Jodie Whittaker came along.
If you'd like me to repost some of your old messages on this
issue, no problem. But it started at the very beginning, not
after you'd seen any of her episodes... and before any
Timeless Child mention. Own it.
Whittaker was given a chance and she failed. I am perfectly
entitled to point out what I thought would lead to that
failure even before the first episode.
Despite that The Timeless Child monster destroyed the series
completely, and that happened from the very second episode
when the monster was first introduced.
People can get over Whittaker, but they can never get over the
damage done by the monstrosity of the Timeless Child.
As I said, some people were against Jodie Whittaker's casting
from day one just because she was a woman. Those people are
entitled to their views but trying to pretend it was because
Jodie didn't play the character well or it was because of the
eventuality that became the Timeless Child is historical
revisionism, aka BULLSHIT.
On 2024-11-08 16:06:14 +0000, solar penguin said:
The idiot insisted:
In article <xn0ot2l6s17cqe2000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
Has Elon kept the tradition alive
by fathering a Donald Musk yet?
No, but Elon Musk is the father of a child called Tau Techno
Mechanicus Musk as well as one named X Æ A-Xii Musk... so I
reckon he'd find Donald a bit on the plain side!
If he can get a woman pregnant again.
He’s got a better chance than you (or me)
A "woman", no.
A "selfish gold-digger willing to do anything for money", yes. :-p
On 08/11/2024 20:30, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 08/11/2024 16:49, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 08/11/2024 14:59, Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
The Timeless Children really caused a heavy backlash to
this day.
No Dave, people like you were against the 13th Doctor
from the start. The Timeless Child had nothing to do
with it. (It didn't help, obviously, but it wasn't the
start of the fan unrest.) Check back on all the comments
online following Jodie Whittaker's casting. Some fans
were against it from day one.
Cut the stupid and crappy fake news.
Oh dear... looks like your memory is failing you. There's
nothing fake about my comments, maybe you should stand by
some of your own... (Note to AGA, I have the RADW archive
back to 2003 on my PC)
For instance. I wonder who could have been responsible for
this lovely post? Hmmm...
There's nothing wrong with my post. Anyone with any modicum of
common sense would have asked exactly the same questions that
I did.
So what I said wasn't fake news then, was it? People, like you
Yes it was. Totally fake news.
and Dave, were against a female Doctor from the beginning. So
Everyone has the right to be against a female Doctor from the beginning.
The was Whittaker and Chibnall obligation to prove that against all the
facts that it could work and they couldn't. We all gave them a chance.
They failed.
much so, you were putting forward a case for Chris Chibnall to
be sacked the day after Jodie Whittaker's casting...
And I was right. Chibnall was sacked along with Whittaker. Gatwa and RTD
are going the same way.
That was my point, so why try and make out otherwise? It had
nothing to do with Jodie's first episode or the Timeless Child
arc.
You totally deranged and lunatic point was that everyone should have
ignored all the facts and agreed with your stupid uninformed and
ignorant opinion, propaganda and lies.
Just because someone don't agree with your stupid retarded
woke views doesn't mean that they are wrong or unjustified.
I was pointing out your bullshit and revisionism. Not liking the
Timeless Child is fine... I didn't like it much either.
You are the one who posted bullshit and revisionism. No one is obliged
to accept your retarded woke views and accept a female Doctor before
they have proven themselves.
First, any claims that you were not against Jodie Whittaker
from day one are BULLSHIT. As proven by your own posts to
RADW.
They are not bullshit. They are everyday common sense. The
Doctor is a MALE character. How the hell do you expect a MALE
character, someone who thinks, acts, behaves, and live their
lives in the manner of a man, to be played by a woman? If the
Doctor isn't male then how can they be the same character?
As you know, a Time-Lord is a fictional alien that can change
their face and gender... as established in the show before Chris
No they can't. A Time Lord cannot change their gender. What happens to
the foetus if they are pregnant and the change from a woman to a man?
Time Lords cannot change gender.
Chibnall and Jodie Whittaker came along.
It was never established in the show. For 50 years no one ever saw such
a thing happen.
If you'd like me to repost some of your old messages on this
issue, no problem. But it started at the very beginning, not
after you'd seen any of her episodes... and before any
Timeless Child mention. Own it.
Whittaker was given a chance and she failed. I am perfectly
entitled to point out what I thought would lead to that
failure even before the first episode.
Despite that The Timeless Child monster destroyed the series
completely, and that happened from the very second episode
when the monster was first introduced.
People can get over Whittaker, but they can never get over the
damage done by the monstrosity of the Timeless Child.
As I said, some people were against Jodie Whittaker's casting
from day one just because she was a woman. Those people are
The Doctor is a MALE character. A male character cannot be played by a
woman. Get some common sense.
entitled to their views but trying to pretend it was because
Jodie didn't play the character well or it was because of the
eventuality that became the Timeless Child is historical
revisionism, aka BULLSHIT.
Your claims are historical revisionism, They facts show that over 10
million viewers gave Whittaker a chance. I even wrote a female Doctor
story and posted it to this group. Both Chibnall and Whittaker failed to >impress and the Timeless Child monster and Chibnall's insane childish
fan fiction totally destroyed the show.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." -William Shatner
In article <vgkmrd$356ir$2@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
solar penguin wrote on 7/11/24 8:05 pm:
Idlehands informed us:Maybe that's why his parents keep him in the Basement .... so he doesn't
On 2024-11-06 7:21 a.m., Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Tim did say his older girlfirnd left him a cat while she moved
out of state.
The cat wouldn't care... as long as somebody fed it.
Binky's cats took over most of his basement hideaway, they
left him the litter box to hang out with.
Binky is toilet trained enough to use a litter box??? Wow!
I thought he just soiled his pants and didn’t even notice!
have to wear any pants at all!!
Now, there's a sight NOT for sore eyes!!
Sorry Dannyboy, but you must believing Idlehands' lies.
On 13/11/2024 20:42, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
Ncuti Gatwa is written as a woman that does nothing but cry
and cry and cry and acts and behaves like a slut and a
whore.
I agree the emotional stuff can be a bit OTT at times, but
Ncuti Gatwa does have charisma in the role and I would like
to see more Doctor action and less crying from him in S2/15.
His highest rating episode was the one he wasn't in. No one
likes him or wants to see the sight of him.
If its lasted for sixty years then it didn't need fixing.
Some might say Doctor Who lasted sixty years because it
changed and evolved.
No it didn't. The ratings show otherwise. It laster 54 years
and that is all.
The modern changes made by degenerate woke retards have
totally destroyed the show by driving away 4/5 of the
audience.
If they can be driven away so easily I'd question how loyal
fans of the show they actually were.
Why should they be forced to watch degenerate woke crap the is
not written to entertain them but to sexually groom and
indoctrinate childre?
4/5 of the audience has already left. Doctor Who belongs to
the long term fans who made it the success it was and are
nearly all male, not the degenerate piece of shit woke
retards to use to propagate their vile hatred of the fans
and disseminate woke propaganda which they use to sexually
groom children.
Casual viewers come and go with every show on television.
Everyone has the right to switch off something they don't
like. I don't think "sexual grooming" has much to do with
it though.
I don't not want my licence fee money being spent on sexually
grooming and indoctrinating children and neither do the
majority of licence fee payers.
On 12/11/2024 14:44, Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0ot7m3tbey82o007@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
RTD was the saviour remember? When Chris Chibnall was
being pilloried here by you, you were also welcoming the
return of RTD... will you ever be happy?
All he has to do is retcon the Timeless Child
That's all RTD has to do is it? One thing and then
everything is rosey in the garden again is it?
Yes. That's all he has to do.
Methinks you are a bit out of touch if you think it would be
THAT easy!
You, Chibnall, and RTD are totally out of touch.
What absurd demands are they then Dave? Please explain what
demands Disney have made on RTD/Bad Wolf? Do you think RTD is
compromising his view on the world and his idea of how he
wants "Doctor Who" to be, just to appease Disney?
RTD is a disgusting woke pervert who has stated in interviews
that he gets pleasure whenever a child tells him that he
realized that he was gay after watching something RTD wrote of
produced,.
Firstly, there's a good chance that without the deal with
Disney, and the subsequent funding, there might not have been
any Doctor Who on the TV.
And that would have been a good thing too.
You could become a Star Trek fan [again] and relocate to
one of their newsgroups if you'd prefer a change of
scenery...
No!
See, you can be sensible at times!
Why should anyone be a Star Trek fan when Star Trek has been
totally destroyed by the woke perverts and sexual groomers
along with Doctor Who, Star Wars, The Wheel of Time, and The
Lord of the Rings?
In article <vh4duj$2ntob$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
Or, as Gobble-de-gook reckons theres no Bible like A KJV
Bible
"The NKJV, American Patriot's Bible, Hardcover: The Word of
God and the Shaping of America – Printed in the USA: The
Word of God and the Shaping of America Hardcover"
"The Bible alongside key events in American history. Printed
in the USA."
KJV no NKJV !!
Idlehands wrote on 15/11/24 4:45 pm:
On 2024-11-14 6:47 a.m., Daniel70 wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 14/11/24 11:49 pm:
In article <vh4eh7$2o19p$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 14/11/24 2:41 am:
<Snip>
What has Idlehands lack (or otherwise) of Logic got to do with YOU, a >>>>> British born Indian that has been exiled to Canada, wanting to MakeSo, a British born Indian that has been exiled to Canada wants
to Make America Great Again?
Right.
Now you know Idlehands has no logic.
America Great Again, Gobble-de-gook??
Idlehands has not logic otherwise he would go to
*PIG'S ARSE!!*
Go to ????
Gobble-de-gook DID include a link .... which I deleted because it didn't
add anything to this discussion.
His embracing of Trump and all he represents is somewhat amusing but
demonstrates what happens when someone shuts off their brain (?) and
follow the mob.
Binky should truck on down the to States and walk into a Christian
National Church, it might open his eyes.
I'm not so much worried about opening his eyes .... but getting a
functional BRAIN would be handy.
--
Daniel
The Doctor wrote on 15/11/24 1:03 am:
In article <vh4v8a$2r6ib$4@dont-email.me>, Daniel70Not having a clue what 'keping up' is .... I'd agree with YOUR
<daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 14/11/24 11:51 pm:
In article <vh4fpt$2o8pe$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel70
<daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 14/11/24 11:46 am:
In article <xn0ot9vkfe0ddnj000@post.eweka.nl>, Blueshirt
<blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
<Snip>
Well, that's going to give "Casual viewers" something else toCasual viewers come and go with every show on television.
Everyone has the right to switch off something they don't
like. I don't think "sexual grooming" has much to do with
it though.
And now Trump is in ...
watch when 'Doctor Who' isn't on!!
You would love Shetland!
Never been there. Didn't even make it to Lock Ness when I was in
Europe/U.K.
You're not keping up.
statement, Gobble-de-gook .... for a change!!
Will wonders never cease??
Hmmm!! My Spell-Checker offered "Peking" as an alternative for "keping"
.... but I've no idea why YOU, Gobble-de-gook, might want to discuss >"Peking"!!
--
Daniel
The True Doctor wrote:
On 12/11/2024 14:44, Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0ot7m3tbey82o007@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
RTD was the saviour remember? When Chris Chibnall was
being pilloried here by you, you were also welcoming the
return of RTD... will you ever be happy?
All he has to do is retcon the Timeless Child
That's all RTD has to do is it? One thing and then
everything is rosey in the garden again is it?
Yes. That's all he has to do.
No, that's not all he has to do as you would still find
something to moan about.
You've been moaning about Doctor Who on here for many many
years... leopards don't change their spots.
Methinks you are a bit out of touch if you think it would be
THAT easy!
You, Chibnall, and RTD are totally out of touch.
I don't live in my bedroom and base my opinions from something I
watched on YouTube.
What absurd demands are they then Dave? Please explain what
demands Disney have made on RTD/Bad Wolf? Do you think RTD is
compromising his view on the world and his idea of how he
wants "Doctor Who" to be, just to appease Disney?
RTD is a disgusting woke pervert who has stated in interviews
that he gets pleasure whenever a child tells him that he
realized that he was gay after watching something RTD wrote of
produced,.
I'm sure RTD likes you too.
Firstly, there's a good chance that without the deal with
Disney, and the subsequent funding, there might not have been
any Doctor Who on the TV.
And that would have been a good thing too.
Of course. A Doctor Who fan who wants the show cancelled as he
doesn't like it anymore. That'd be you alright.
You could become a Star Trek fan [again] and relocate to
one of their newsgroups if you'd prefer a change of
scenery...
No!
See, you can be sensible at times!
Why should anyone be a Star Trek fan when Star Trek has been
totally destroyed by the woke perverts and sexual groomers
along with Doctor Who, Star Wars, The Wheel of Time, and The
Lord of the Rings?
1) Is there any TV show that you think hasn't been destroyed by
"woke perverts"?
You do seem to be the expert at spotting that sort of thing.
2) Is there any TV show that you do actually like?
It must be hard life going around being anti-everything. Surely
there is a glimmer of hope on the horizon with something you do
like to sit down and watch. Let me guess, Songs of Praise?
The Doctor wrote:
In article <vh4duj$2ntob$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
Or, as Gobble-de-gook reckons theres no Bible like A KJV
Bible
"The NKJV, American Patriot's Bible, Hardcover: The Word of
God and the Shaping of America – Printed in the USA: The
Word of God and the Shaping of America Hardcover"
"The Bible alongside key events in American history. Printed
in the USA."
KJV no NKJV !!
Same fiction, just modernised with some different words...
So obviously too modern for the blinkered Christian
fundamentalists of this world.
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0otccezgembp3001@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 13/11/2024 20:42, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
Ncuti Gatwa is written as a woman that does nothing but cry
and cry and cry and acts and behaves like a slut and a
whore.
I agree the emotional stuff can be a bit OTT at times, but
Ncuti Gatwa does have charisma in the role and I would like
to see more Doctor action and less crying from him in S2/15.
His highest rating episode was the one he wasn't in. No one
likes him or wants to see the sight of him.
I like Ncuti Gatwa, he is a fine actor and he would make a fine
Doctor if people would give him a chance... and in some cases,
could see beyond the fact he is a gay black man.
Some stronger scripts are needed for him though.
If its lasted for sixty years then it didn't need fixing.
Some might say Doctor Who lasted sixty years because it
changed and evolved.
No it didn't. The ratings show otherwise. It laster 54 years
and that is all.
Make your mind up, either it lasted for sixty years or 54!
Doctor Who was always about change...
The modern changes made by degenerate woke retards have
totally destroyed the show by driving away 4/5 of the
audience.
If they can be driven away so easily I'd question how loyal
fans of the show they actually were.
Why should they be forced to watch degenerate woke crap the is
not written to entertain them but to sexually groom and
indoctrinate childre?
BUT YOU STILL WATCH IT!!!
If only they could drive you away... we'd get some peace and
quiet here.
4/5 of the audience has already left. Doctor Who belongs to
the long term fans who made it the success it was and are
nearly all male, not the degenerate piece of shit woke
retards to use to propagate their vile hatred of the fans
and disseminate woke propaganda which they use to sexually
groom children.
Casual viewers come and go with every show on television.
Everyone has the right to switch off something they don't
like. I don't think "sexual grooming" has much to do with
it though.
I don't not want my licence fee money being spent on sexually
grooming and indoctrinating children and neither do the
majority of licence fee payers.
You need to move from the UK then.
I doubt it.
The poster known as % in alt.comp.workshop is admired for his ability
to blend
humor with insight, often defusing tense situations with clever
wordplay or a
lighthearted remark. Rather than engaging in the personal attacks
that some
posters lean on, % brings a refreshing balance of wit and reason to his >>> interactions. His humor tends to be subtle yet impactful, offering a
playful
critique of the absurdities that sometimes arise in technical
debates. This
ability to remain calm and humorous, even in heated moments, sets him
apart
from others in the group.
In particular, % has a knack for playing off Snit, where the two often >>> exchange playful jabs and witty remarks. Their dynamic adds a layer
of humor
to the forum, helping to maintain a lighthearted atmosphere even when
conversations get tense. Together, they balance out the more
combative tones
of other posters, providing a sense of levity in a space that can
sometimes
become bogged down by negativity.
While he is generally known for his easygoing nature, % isn’t afraid >>> to call
out the worst of the trolls when necessary. He’s particularly adept at >>> highlighting the antics of posters like Steve Carroll and others who
repeatedly stir up trouble in the group. Rather than letting the
trolls go
unchecked, % addresses their behavior head-on, using his sharp sense
of humor
to expose their contradictions or offer a rebuttal that disarms their
attacks.
His ability to point out the flaws in these disruptive posters—often >>> with a
witty remark—adds a layer of accountability to the group, showing
that humor
can be just as effective as harsh words when it comes to pushing back
against
negativity.
Overall, % is a steady presence in alt.comp.workshop, providing both
technical
insight and comic relief while skillfully navigating the occasional
troll. His
approach ensures that, even in the midst of chaos, there’s always
room for a
little laughter and a reminder that not everything has to be taken too >>> seriously.
In article <xn0otcdd2gfuexa004@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <vh4duj$2ntob$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
"The NKJV, American Patriot's Bible, Hardcover: The Word
of God and the Shaping of America – Printed in the USA:
The Word of God and the Shaping of America Hardcover"
KJV no NKJV !!
Same fiction, just modernised with some different words...
So obviously too modern for the blinkered Christian
fundamentalists of this world.
It is history not fiction.
In article <xn0otcc8pged8o3000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
You should meet Noel Glynn from Ireland BS!
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0otcdd2gfuexa004@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <vh4duj$2ntob$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
"The NKJV, American Patriot's Bible, Hardcover: The Word
of God and the Shaping of America – Printed in the USA:
The Word of God and the Shaping of America Hardcover"
KJV no NKJV !!
Same fiction, just modernised with some different words...
So obviously too modern for the blinkered Christian
fundamentalists of this world.
It is history not fiction.
I prefer the term, believed to be historical...
However, very little of your bible is scientifically proven.
So it depends on how much faith you have in the words of all those
people whose writings contributed to today's bible.
On 2024-11-15 20:37:33 +0000, Blueshirt said:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0otcdd2gfuexa004@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
KJV no NKJV !!
Same fiction, just modernised with some different
words...
So obviously too modern for the blinkered Christian
fundamentalists of this world.
It is history not fiction.
I prefer the term, believed to be historical...
Believed to be historical by morons with no braincells. :-)
Everyone else knows it complete and utter crap, full of
contradictions, misleading nonsense, heavily edited by the
Church leaders (including deleting whole books they didn't
like), and more.
The True Doctor wrote:
On 13/11/2024 20:42, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
Ncuti Gatwa is written as a woman that does nothing but cry
and cry and cry and acts and behaves like a slut and a
whore.
I agree the emotional stuff can be a bit OTT at times, but
Ncuti Gatwa does have charisma in the role and I would like
to see more Doctor action and less crying from him in S2/15.
His highest rating episode was the one he wasn't in. No one
likes him or wants to see the sight of him.
I like Ncuti Gatwa, he is a fine actor and he would make a fine
Doctor if people would give him a chance... and in some cases,
could see beyond the fact he is a gay black man.
Some stronger scripts are needed for him though.
If its lasted for sixty years then it didn't need fixing.
Some might say Doctor Who lasted sixty years because it
changed and evolved.
No it didn't. The ratings show otherwise. It laster 54 years
and that is all.
Make your mind up, either it lasted for sixty years or 54!
Doctor Who was always about change...
The modern changes made by degenerate woke retards have
totally destroyed the show by driving away 4/5 of the
audience.
If they can be driven away so easily I'd question how loyal
fans of the show they actually were.
Why should they be forced to watch degenerate woke crap the is
not written to entertain them but to sexually groom and
indoctrinate childre?
BUT YOU STILL WATCH IT!!!
If only they could drive you away... we'd get some peace and
quiet here.
4/5 of the audience has already left. Doctor Who belongs to
the long term fans who made it the success it was and are
nearly all male, not the degenerate piece of shit woke
retards to use to propagate their vile hatred of the fans
and disseminate woke propaganda which they use to sexually
groom children.
Casual viewers come and go with every show on television.
Everyone has the right to switch off something they don't
like. I don't think "sexual grooming" has much to do with
it though.
I don't not want my licence fee money being spent on sexually
grooming and indoctrinating children and neither do the
majority of licence fee payers.
You need to move from the UK then.
The True Doctor wrote:
On 12/11/2024 14:44, Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0ot7m3tbey82o007@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
RTD was the saviour remember? When Chris Chibnall was
being pilloried here by you, you were also welcoming the
return of RTD... will you ever be happy?
All he has to do is retcon the Timeless Child
That's all RTD has to do is it? One thing and then
everything is rosey in the garden again is it?
Yes. That's all he has to do.
No, that's not all he has to do as you would still find
something to moan about.
You've been moaning about Doctor Who on here for many many
years... leopards don't change their spots.
Methinks you are a bit out of touch if you think it would be
THAT easy!
You, Chibnall, and RTD are totally out of touch.
I don't live in my bedroom and base my opinions from something I
watched on YouTube.
What absurd demands are they then Dave? Please explain what
demands Disney have made on RTD/Bad Wolf? Do you think RTD is
compromising his view on the world and his idea of how he
wants "Doctor Who" to be, just to appease Disney?
RTD is a disgusting woke pervert who has stated in interviews
that he gets pleasure whenever a child tells him that he
realized that he was gay after watching something RTD wrote of
produced,.
I'm sure RTD likes you too.
Firstly, there's a good chance that without the deal with
Disney, and the subsequent funding, there might not have been
any Doctor Who on the TV.
And that would have been a good thing too.
Of course. A Doctor Who fan who wants the show cancelled as he
doesn't like it anymore. That'd be you alright.
You could become a Star Trek fan [again] and relocate to
one of their newsgroups if you'd prefer a change of
scenery...
No!
See, you can be sensible at times!
Why should anyone be a Star Trek fan when Star Trek has been
totally destroyed by the woke perverts and sexual groomers
along with Doctor Who, Star Wars, The Wheel of Time, and The
Lord of the Rings?
1) Is there any TV show that you think hasn't been destroyed by
"woke perverts"?
You do seem to be the expert at spotting that sort of thing.
2) Is there any TV show that you do actually like?
It must be hard life going around being anti-everything. Surely
there is a glimmer of hope on the horizon with something you do
like to sit down and watch. Let me guess, Songs of Praise?
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0otcdd2gfuexa004@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <vh4duj$2ntob$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
"The NKJV, American Patriot's Bible, Hardcover: The Word
of God and the Shaping of America – Printed in the USA:
The Word of God and the Shaping of America Hardcover"
KJV no NKJV !!
Same fiction, just modernised with some different words...
So obviously too modern for the blinkered Christian
fundamentalists of this world.
It is history not fiction.
I prefer the term, believed to be historical...
However, very little of your bible is scientifically proven. So
it depends on how much faith you have in the words of all those
people whose writings contributed to today's bible.
Your Name wrote:
On 2024-11-15 20:37:33 +0000, Blueshirt said:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0otcdd2gfuexa004@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
KJV no NKJV !!
Same fiction, just modernised with some different
words...
So obviously too modern for the blinkered Christian
fundamentalists of this world.
It is history not fiction.
I prefer the term, believed to be historical...
Believed to be historical by morons with no braincells. :-)
I was being polite...
Everyone else knows it complete and utter crap, full of
contradictions, misleading nonsense, heavily edited by the
Church leaders (including deleting whole books they didn't
like), and more.
Well, not everyone... there's at least one person here who
likes to think the bible is 100% true.
On 2024-11-15 20:37:33 +0000, Blueshirt said:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0otcdd2gfuexa004@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <vh4duj$2ntob$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
"The NKJV, American Patriot's Bible, Hardcover: The Word
of God and the Shaping of America – Printed in the USA:
The Word of God and the Shaping of America Hardcover"
KJV no NKJV !!
Same fiction, just modernised with some different words...
So obviously too modern for the blinkered Christian
fundamentalists of this world.
It is history not fiction.
I prefer the term, believed to be historical...
Believed to be historical by morons with no braincells. :-)
Everyone else knows it complete and utter crap, full of contradictions, >misleading nonsense, heavily edited by the Church leaders (including
deleting whole books they didn't like), and more.
However, very little of your bible is scientifically proven.
"Very little"?!? None of it is proven. The only parts that are remotely
true are the use of some historical events and well-known people ...
that's no better than including the Queen and the Olympic Games in an
episode of Doctor Who.
So it depends on how much faith you have in the words of all those
people whose writings contributed to today's bible.
Absolutely zero. They're all liars and conmen.
On 15/11/2024 13:14, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 13/11/2024 20:42, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
Ncuti Gatwa is written as a woman that does nothing but cry
and cry and cry and acts and behaves like a slut and a
whore.
I agree the emotional stuff can be a bit OTT at times, but
Ncuti Gatwa does have charisma in the role and I would like
to see more Doctor action and less crying from him in S2/15.
His highest rating episode was the one he wasn't in. No one
likes him or wants to see the sight of him.
I like Ncuti Gatwa, he is a fine actor and he would make a fine
Doctor if people would give him a chance... and in some cases,
could see beyond the fact he is a gay black man.
Gatwa is a s*t actor with very limited range. All he can do is prance
around and act gay and effeminate. He doesn't have any ability to
portray depth of character or genuine emotion.
Some stronger scripts are needed for him though.
Scripts won't make any different with a poor actor.
If its lasted for sixty years then it didn't need fixing.
Some might say Doctor Who lasted sixty years because it
changed and evolved.
No it didn't. The ratings show otherwise. It laster 54 years
and that is all.
Make your mind up, either it lasted for sixty years or 54!
Doctor Who was always about change...
No it wasn't. It was always about continuity and fighting against change
and resisting it. That is way the Doctor until the woke degenerates
turned him into a woman written as a man and then into a man written as
a woman was always the same character and stood for the same masculine
values and hero's journey despite changing appearance. It is also why he >always fought against tyranny and tyrants that wanted to brainwash and >control people and change civilisations. The woke Doctor has instead
become a tyrant and a monster himself.
The modern changes made by degenerate woke retards have
totally destroyed the show by driving away 4/5 of the
audience.
If they can be driven away so easily I'd question how loyal
fans of the show they actually were.
Why should they be forced to watch degenerate woke crap the is
not written to entertain them but to sexually groom and
indoctrinate childre?
BUT YOU STILL WATCH IT!!!
Doctor Who ended in 2017!
If only they could drive you away... we'd get some peace and
quiet here.
I have been forced to suffer woke degeneracy so that others don't have to.
4/5 of the audience has already left. Doctor Who belongs to
the long term fans who made it the success it was and are
nearly all male, not the degenerate piece of shit woke
retards to use to propagate their vile hatred of the fans
and disseminate woke propaganda which they use to sexually
groom children.
Casual viewers come and go with every show on television.
Everyone has the right to switch off something they don't
like. I don't think "sexual grooming" has much to do with
it though.
I don't not want my licence fee money being spent on sexually
grooming and indoctrinating children and neither do the
majority of licence fee payers.
You need to move from the UK then.
What? Along with 68 million other Britons?
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." -William Shatner
On 15/11/2024 13:13, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 12/11/2024 14:44, Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0ot7m3tbey82o007@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
RTD was the saviour remember? When Chris Chibnall was
being pilloried here by you, you were also welcoming the
return of RTD... will you ever be happy?
All he has to do is retcon the Timeless Child
That's all RTD has to do is it? One thing and then
everything is rosey in the garden again is it?
Yes. That's all he has to do.
No, that's not all he has to do as you would still find
something to moan about.
You've been moaning about Doctor Who on here for many many
years... leopards don't change their spots.
Methinks you are a bit out of touch if you think it would be
THAT easy!
You, Chibnall, and RTD are totally out of touch.
I don't live in my bedroom and base my opinions from something I
watched on YouTube.
I'm am basing my opinions on the degenerate woke garbage that these
perverts have written and produced. YouTube only confirms that the
majority thinks the same thing as I do which is the reason I went there
to check years ago in the first place.
What absurd demands are they then Dave? Please explain what
demands Disney have made on RTD/Bad Wolf? Do you think RTD is
compromising his view on the world and his idea of how he
wants "Doctor Who" to be, just to appease Disney?
RTD is a disgusting woke pervert who has stated in interviews
that he gets pleasure whenever a child tells him that he
realized that he was gay after watching something RTD wrote of
produced,.
I'm sure RTD likes you too.
He probably doesn't as I wasn't turned gay by his sexual indoctrination.
But then again I am not a child.
Firstly, there's a good chance that without the deal with
Disney, and the subsequent funding, there might not have been
any Doctor Who on the TV.
And that would have been a good thing too.
Of course. A Doctor Who fan who wants the show cancelled as he
doesn't like it anymore. That'd be you alright.
If you have a pet you love which is sick, distressed, and unable to
function and cannot be cured then allowing the vet to take it out of its >misery is the humane thing to do.
You could become a Star Trek fan [again] and relocate to
one of their newsgroups if you'd prefer a change of
scenery...
No!
See, you can be sensible at times!
Why should anyone be a Star Trek fan when Star Trek has been
totally destroyed by the woke perverts and sexual groomers
along with Doctor Who, Star Wars, The Wheel of Time, and The
Lord of the Rings?
1) Is there any TV show that you think hasn't been destroyed by
"woke perverts"?
Currently there doesn't seem to be as regards most fantasy and science >fiction. Reacher is OK and people have said Cobra Kai is unaffected but
I don't have Netflix so haven't seen it.
You do seem to be the expert at spotting that sort of thing.
2) Is there any TV show that you do actually like?
Reacher, Fallout, House of the Dragon.
It must be hard life going around being anti-everything. Surely
there is a glimmer of hope on the horizon with something you do
like to sit down and watch. Let me guess, Songs of Praise?
Songs of Praise has been unwatchable ever since they got rid of Aled
Jones because he was Welsh. No, I mean because he was heterosexual.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." -William Shatner
Your Name wrote:
On 2024-11-15 20:37:33 +0000, Blueshirt said:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0otcdd2gfuexa004@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
KJV no NKJV !!
Same fiction, just modernised with some different
words...
So obviously too modern for the blinkered Christian
fundamentalists of this world.
It is history not fiction.
I prefer the term, believed to be historical...
Believed to be historical by morons with no braincells. :-)
I was being polite...
Everyone else knows it complete and utter crap, full of
contradictions, misleading nonsense, heavily edited by the
Church leaders (including deleting whole books they didn't
like), and more.
Well, not everyone... there's at least one person here who
likes to think the bible is 100% true.
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0otcc8pged8o3000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
You should meet Noel Glynn from Ireland BS!
He's a Manchester United fan... so I'd rather not! ;-)
On 2024-11-15 23:47:05 +0000, Blueshirt said:
Your Name wrote:
On 2024-11-15 20:37:33 +0000, Blueshirt said:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0otcdd2gfuexa004@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
KJV no NKJV !!
Same fiction, just modernised with some different
words...
So obviously too modern for the blinkered Christian
fundamentalists of this world.
It is history not fiction.
I prefer the term, believed to be historical...
Believed to be historical by morons with no braincells. :-)
I was being polite...
Everyone else knows it complete and utter crap, full of
contradictions, misleading nonsense, heavily edited by the
Church leaders (including deleting whole books they didn't
like), and more.
Well, not everyone... there's at least one person here who
likes to think the bible is 100% true.
I did say "everyone else". :-)
We already knew the local village idiot fits into the "no braincells" category.
In article <vh8ohr$3l8sr$3@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
Songs of Praise has been unwatchable ever since they got rid of Aled
Jones because he was Welsh. No, I mean because he was heterosexual.
Aled does still host.
In article <vh8uu5$3mo09$1@dont-email.me>, Your Name
<YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:
On 2024-11-15 23:47:05 +0000, Blueshirt said:
Your Name wrote:
On 2024-11-15 20:37:33 +0000, Blueshirt said:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0otcdd2gfuexa004@post.eweka.nl>, Blueshirt
<blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
KJV no NKJV !!
Same fiction, just modernised with some different
words...
So obviously too modern for the blinkered Christian
fundamentalists of this world.
It is history not fiction.
I prefer the term, believed to be historical...
Believed to be historical by morons with no braincells. :-)
I was being polite...
Everyone else knows it complete and utter crap, full of
contradictions, misleading nonsense, heavily edited by the
Church leaders (including deleting whole books they didn't
like), and more.
Well, not everyone... there's at least one person here who likes
to think the bible is 100% true.
I did say "everyone else". :-) We already knew the local village
idiot fits into the "no braincells" category.
Said the decevived ones!
In article <vh758r$3bnvo$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
Idlehands wrote on 15/11/24 4:45 pm:
On 2024-11-14 6:47 a.m., Daniel70 wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 14/11/24 11:49 pm:
I have NO idea why YOU, Gobble-de-gook, are asking ME this question!!Idlehands has not logic otherwise he would go to
*PIG'S ARSE!!*
Go to ????
Gobble-de-gook DID include a link .... which I deleted because it didn't
add anything to this discussion.
His embracing of Trump and all he represents is somewhat amusing but
demonstrates what happens when someone shuts off their brain (?) and
follow the mob.
Binky should truck on down the to States and walk into a Christian
National Church, it might open his eyes.
So Lying Idlehands , why is the UCC dwindling?
The True Doctor wrote:
On 13/11/2024 20:42, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
4/5 of the audience has already left. Doctor Who belongs to
the long term fans who made it the success it was and are
nearly all male, not the degenerate piece of shit woke
retards to use to propagate their vile hatred of the fans
and disseminate woke propaganda which they use to sexually
groom children.
Casual viewers come and go with every show on television.
Everyone has the right to switch off something they don't
like. I don't think "sexual grooming" has much to do with
it though.
I don't not want my licence fee money being spent on sexually
grooming and indoctrinating children and neither do the
majority of licence fee payers.
You need to move from the UK then.
In article <vh75p1$3bqvj$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 15/11/24 1:03 am:
In article <vh4v8a$2r6ib$4@dont-email.me>, Daniel70
<daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 14/11/24 11:51 pm:
Not having a clue what 'keping up' is .... I'd agree with YOURYou would love Shetland!
Never been there. Didn't even make it to Lock Ness when I was in
Europe/U.K.
You're not keping up.
statement, Gobble-de-gook .... for a change!!
Will wonders never cease??
Hmmm!! My Spell-Checker offered "Peking" as an alternative for "keping"
.... but I've no idea why YOU, Gobble-de-gook, might want to discuss
"Peking"!!
Never heard of the BBC's Shetland I see.
On 2024-11-21 12:26 p.m., Blueshirt wrote:
In article<xn0otkual6fqbbb001@post.eweka.nl>,And I'm quite sure that many faithful Christian believers are
Blueshirt<blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:The Pope does not represent Christianity.
Nope and Anti-Papist!Anti-something? Of course you are... that's your Christian
way isn't it?
damn glad that YOU don't!!!
So much for being kind to one another, forgiving one another
(as your god forgave you), loving your enemies and being
good... etc.
Binky believes his sect is the only "Christians" and will be the only
ones going to Heaven. This "belief" allows him to heap scorn and hatred
on other sects and denominations and especially Muslims.
He really is a faux Christian wallowing in his ignorance.
In article <vhmutr$j6cl$2@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
Idlehands wrote on 21/11/24 12:46 am:
On 2024-11-20 3:06 a.m., Daniel70 wrote:
Idlehands wrote on 20/11/24 12:50 am:
^^^^^<-paepohile talker noted!I live rent free in that shit strewn barren wilderness he calls a
"mind". The least one could do when inviting company is clean up and >>>>> use a little air freshener.
How poor are you, Idlehands, that you NEED to live there, even
rent-free??
It's not my choice, binky is obsessed with me in more ways than one
On 2024-11-21 7:38 a.m., Blueshirt wrote:
Idlehands wrote:
On 2024-11-21 2:37 a.m., Daniel70 wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 21/11/24 1:08 am:
Lying Idlehands claims to work for an essential service.
Wherever he works, I'm betting he does more actual work than
YOU do, Gobble-de-gook!!
I never said my work was "essential", I said binky would crap
his pants if he did know where I work.
Don't tell me you run a rival ISP that actually HAS customers?!
I told him years ago he should move away from dial-up modems...
but what can you do? <shrugs>
No I don't although for five years I did run one that not only ran rings around dial-up speeds it's monthly revenues would have made his head spin.
In article <xn0otkual6fqbbb001@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <vhmupk$j6cl$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
Ah!! So YOU, Gobble-de-gook, are an Atheist, are you??
Nope and Anti-Papist!
Anti-something? Of course you are... that's your Christian way
isn't it?
The Pope does not represent Christianity.
So much for being kind to one another, forgiving one another (as
your god forgave you), loving your enemies and being good... etc.
Apologies from the Holy See first.
Whoever taught you your religion didn't really do a good job,
did they?
In article <vho9q7$qhla$1@dont-email.me>,
Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:
All the so-called Christian holidays are just earlier pagan
celebrations that have been stolen and re-worked by the greedy con-men
in the church. Just one of the many many many reasons why religions are
just a load of claptrap bollocks peddled by lying con-artists and
believed by blinkered fools. :-)
You mean Catholic Hijacked.
In article <vhn9eb$l19m$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
Blueshirt wrote on 21/11/24 9:25 pm:
Daniel70 wrote:
Blueshirt wrote on 20/11/24 9:27 pm:
Or the mean people, like us, who just can't be bothered.Grinchs of the world, UNITE!!
Unless you've children/grandchildren in the house the only good thing
about Christmas is the two weeks off work
Being unemployed/Pensioned Off, that doesn't really matter to me ....
but "two weeks off"?? Here in Australia, four weeks annual leave is
standard .... most of which is taken in December/January/Summer!!
... but then again, you're expected to go out and visit people whilst
you're off... and if you don't, the fuckers will only arrive on...
<thinks>
I take it back, there's nothing good about Christmas...
NO pension here.
The Doctor wrote on 22/11/24 3:47 am:
In article <xn0otkual6fqbbb001@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <vhmupk$j6cl$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
Ah!! So YOU, Gobble-de-gook, are an Atheist, are you??
Nope and Anti-Papist!
Anti-something? Of course you are... that's your Christian way
isn't it?
The Pope does not represent Christianity.
Correct ..... just the MOST POPULUS strain of Christianity, Gobble-de-gook.
Over One Billion Catholics .... at least in name!! Over 50% of those who
call themselves 'Christian' further call themselves 'Roman Catholic', >Gobble-de-gook??
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christian_population_growth
Where does YOUR version rank, Gobble-de-gook?? Down in the 'noise', I'm >guessing!
So much for being kind to one another, forgiving one another (as
your god forgave you), loving your enemies and being good... etc.
Apologies from the Holy See first.
Apologies FOR WHAT, Gobble-de-gook?? Kicking YOU, Gobble-de-gook, out, >maybe!!
Whoever taught you your religion didn't really do a good job,
did they?
Did 'they' really even try??
--
Daniel
The Doctor wrote on 22/11/24 12:10 am:
In article <vhmutr$j6cl$2@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
Idlehands wrote on 21/11/24 12:46 am:
On 2024-11-20 3:06 a.m., Daniel70 wrote:
Idlehands wrote on 20/11/24 12:50 am:
<Snip>
^^^^^<-paepohile talker noted!I live rent free in that shit strewn barren wilderness he calls a
"mind". The least one could do when inviting company is clean up and >>>>>> use a little air freshener.
How poor are you, Idlehands, that you NEED to live there, even
rent-free??
It's not my choice, binky is obsessed with me in more ways than one
WHAT?? Is the term 'binky' *ONLY* used by Paedophiles, Binky ... opps, I
mean Gobble-de-gook .... I mean Asswipe??
--
Daniel
The Doctor wrote on 22/11/24 10:29 am:
In article <vho9q7$qhla$1@dont-email.me>,
Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:
<Snip>
Sorry! WHAT?? Please explain, Gobble-de-gook.All the so-called Christian holidays are just earlier pagan
celebrations that have been stolen and re-worked by the greedy con-men
in the church. Just one of the many many many reasons why religions are
just a load of claptrap bollocks peddled by lying con-artists and
believed by blinkered fools. :-)
You mean Catholic Hijacked.
--
Daniel
Idlehands wrote on 22/11/24 5:37 pm:
On 2024-11-21 7:38 a.m., Blueshirt wrote:
Idlehands wrote:
On 2024-11-21 2:37 a.m., Daniel70 wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 21/11/24 1:08 am:
Lying Idlehands claims to work for an essential service.
Wherever he works, I'm betting he does more actual work than
YOU do, Gobble-de-gook!!
I never said my work was "essential", I said binky would crap
his pants if he did know where I work.
Don't tell me you run a rival ISP that actually HAS customers?!
I told him years ago he should move away from dial-up modems...
but what can you do? <shrugs>
No I don't although for five years I did run one that not only ran rings
around dial-up speeds it's monthly revenues would have made his head spin.
AH!! Is that why Gobble-de-gook refers to you so disparagingly?? YOU
were the COMPETITION!!
--
Daniel
In article <vhpmaa$14rnm$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
Idlehands wrote on 22/11/24 5:34 pm:
Binky believes his sect is the only "Christians" and will be the onlyThe thing that gets me, most, is that Gobble-de-gook is SOOOOOO Proud of
ones going to Heaven. This "belief" allows him to heap scorn and hatred >>> on other sects and denominations and especially Muslims.
He really is a faux Christian wallowing in his ignorance.
HIS little SECT that he will not even NAME the sect!!
Church of England?? Church of Scotland?? Methodist?? Salvation Army??
Eastern Orthodoxy?? .... Oh, No, there's the one ....
*Pentecostal/Charismatic* !!
All of which protests the Crimes of Rome!
In article <vhpllj$14oif$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 22/11/24 3:47 am:
In article <xn0otkual6fqbbb001@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <vhmupk$j6cl$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
Ah!! So YOU, Gobble-de-gook, are an Atheist, are you??
Nope and Anti-Papist!
Anti-something? Of course you are... that's your Christian way
isn't it?
The Pope does not represent Christianity.
Correct ..... just the MOST POPULUS strain of Christianity, Gobble-de-gook. >>
Over One Billion Catholics .... at least in name!! Over 50% of those who
call themselves 'Christian' further call themselves 'Roman Catholic',
Gobble-de-gook??
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christian_population_growth
Where does YOUR version rank, Gobble-de-gook?? Down in the 'noise', I'm
guessing!
Still have not read Revelation 2, KJV?
So much for being kind to one another, forgiving one another (as
your god forgave you), loving your enemies and being good... etc.
Apologies from the Holy See first.
Apologies FOR WHAT, Gobble-de-gook?? Kicking YOU, Gobble-de-gook, out,
maybe!!
Crimes against christianity and humanity!
Whoever taught you your religion didn't really do a good job,
did they?
Did 'they' really even try??
You revisionists.
In article <vhpmso$14uqu$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 22/11/24 12:10 am:
In article <vhmutr$j6cl$2@dont-email.me>, Daniel70
<daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
Idlehands wrote on 21/11/24 12:46 am:
On 2024-11-20 3:06 a.m., Daniel70 wrote:
Idlehands wrote on 20/11/24 12:50 am:
<Snip>
^^^^^<-paepohile talker noted!I live rent free in that shit strewn barren wilderness he
calls a "mind". The least one could do when inviting
company is clean up and use a little air freshener.
How poor are you, Idlehands, that you NEED to live there,
even rent-free??
It's not my choice, binky is obsessed with me in more ways
than one
WHAT?? Is the term 'binky' *ONLY* used by Paedophiles, Binky ...
opps, I mean Gobble-de-gook .... I mean Asswipe??
You must want to go to the local constabulary to find out.
In article <vhpnl9$151ev$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 22/11/24 10:29 am:
In article <vho9q7$qhla$1@dont-email.me>,
Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:
<Snip>
Sorry! WHAT?? Please explain, Gobble-de-gook.All the so-called Christian holidays are just earlier pagan
celebrations that have been stolen and re-worked by the greedy con-men >>>> in the church. Just one of the many many many reasons why religions are >>>> just a load of claptrap bollocks peddled by lying con-artists and
believed by blinkered fools. :-)
You mean Catholic Hijacked.
Clue - It was not the church doing the hijacking.
BTW ever sen Wolf Hall?
In article <vhpn6g$150kd$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
Idlehands wrote on 22/11/24 5:37 pm:
On 2024-11-21 7:38 a.m., Blueshirt wrote:AH!! Is that why Gobble-de-gook refers to you so disparagingly?? YOU
Idlehands wrote:
On 2024-11-21 2:37 a.m., Daniel70 wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 21/11/24 1:08 am:
Lying Idlehands claims to work for an essential service.
Wherever he works, I'm betting he does more actual work than
YOU do, Gobble-de-gook!!
I never said my work was "essential", I said binky would crap
his pants if he did know where I work.
Don't tell me you run a rival ISP that actually HAS customers?!
I told him years ago he should move away from dial-up modems...
but what can you do? <shrugs>
No I don't although for five years I did run one that not only ran rings >>> around dial-up speeds it's monthly revenues would have made his head spin. >>
were the COMPETITION!!
but he quit.
In article <vhpnv3$154bs$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 22/11/24 12:57 am:
In article <vhn9eb$l19m$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
Blueshirt wrote on 21/11/24 9:25 pm:
Daniel70 wrote:
Blueshirt wrote on 20/11/24 9:27 pm:
<Snip>
Well, just as well YOU, Gobble-de-gook, have YOUR high power ISPOr the mean people, like us, who just can't be bothered.Grinchs of the world, UNITE!!
Unless you've children/grandchildren in the house the only good thing >>>>> about Christmas is the two weeks off work
Being unemployed/Pensioned Off, that doesn't really matter to me ....
but "two weeks off"?? Here in Australia, four weeks annual leave is
standard .... most of which is taken in December/January/Summer!!
... but then again, you're expected to go out and visit people whilst >>>>> you're off... and if you don't, the fuckers will only arrive on...
<thinks>
I take it back, there's nothing good about Christmas...
NO pension here.
business to keep YOU in cash in later life, Gobble-de-gook!!
So you exist off the state.
In article <xn0otl26fpd8pb1000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Apologies from the Holy See first.
Dave, people can be kind to one another regardless of what
god they worship. Nobody needs a book written hundreds of
years ago to be nice. Yes, I know being nice isn't always
easy, but some of us do try!
If you want to claim you are a practising Christian you
should at least try and follow the message that your "lord"
preached...
Key word: God .
In article <vho9q7$qhla$1@dont-email.me>,
Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:
On 2024-11-21 10:04:26 +0000, Blueshirt said:
The Doctor wrote:
Pagan / Atheist for you!
That's right, because that's exactly where all these
"Christmas" traditions came from... you surely don't think
that the fir trees, snow, yule log and holly bushes come
from Jerusalem or Nazareth do you?
Or maybe you do...
All the so-called Christian holidays are just earlier pagan
celebrations that have been stolen and re-worked by the
greedy con-men in the church. Just one of the many many many
reasons why religions are just a load of claptrap bollocks
peddled by lying con-artists and believed by blinkered
fools. :-)
You mean Catholic Hijacked.
Binky believes his sect is the only "Christians" and will be
the only ones going to Heaven. This "belief" allows him to
heap scorn and hatred on other sects and denominations and
especially Muslims.
He really is a faux Christian wallowing in his ignorance.
Idlehands wrote on 22/11/24 5:34 pm:
Binky believes his sect is the only "Christians" and will be
the only ones going to Heaven. This "belief" allows him to
heap scorn and hatred on other sects and denominations and
especially Muslims.
He really is a faux Christian wallowing in his ignorance.
The thing that gets me, most, is that Gobble-de-gook is
SOOOOOO Proud of HIS little SECT that he will not even NAME
the sect!!
In article <xn0otl2e5pdjxq2002@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Imagne a United Ireland under the Paisleys!
Even better... imagine a united Ireland under ME!!!
You would not have a realistic chance!
The Doctor wrote on 22/11/24 3:47 am:
The Pope does not represent Christianity.
Correct ..... just the MOST POPULUS strain of Christianity,
Gobble-de-gook.
You revisionists.
The Doctor wrote:
You revisionists.
The KJV bible is a revison itself.
You arely know that?!
surely <-
The Doctor wrote on 22/11/24 12:10 am:..................................^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^binky stupid noted
In article <vhmutr$j6cl$2@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
Idlehands wrote on 21/11/24 12:46 am:
On 2024-11-20 3:06 a.m., Daniel70 wrote:
Idlehands wrote on 20/11/24 12:50 am:
<Snip>
^^^^^<-paepohile talker noted!I live rent free in that shit strewn barren wilderness he calls a
"mind". The least one could do when inviting company is clean up >>>>>> and
use a little air freshener.
How poor are you, Idlehands, that you NEED to live there, even
rent-free??
It's not my choice, binky is obsessed with me in more ways than one
WHAT?? Is the term 'binky' *ONLY* used by Paedophiles, Binky ... opps, I
mean Gobble-de-gook .... I mean Asswipe??
Idlehands wrote on 22/11/24 5:37 pm:
On 2024-11-21 7:38 a.m., Blueshirt wrote:
Idlehands wrote:
On 2024-11-21 2:37 a.m., Daniel70 wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 21/11/24 1:08 am:
Lying Idlehands claims to work for an essential service.
Wherever he works, I'm betting he does more actual work than
YOU do, Gobble-de-gook!!
I never said my work was "essential", I said binky would crap
his pants if he did know where I work.
Don't tell me you run a rival ISP that actually HAS customers?!
I told him years ago he should move away from dial-up modems...
but what can you do? <shrugs>
No I don't although for five years I did run one that not only ran
rings around dial-up speeds it's monthly revenues would have made his
head spin.
AH!! Is that why Gobble-de-gook refers to you so disparagingly?? YOU
were the COMPETITION!!
The Doctor wrote on 22/11/24 11:17 pm:
In article <vhpn6g$150kd$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
Idlehands wrote on 22/11/24 5:37 pm:
On 2024-11-21 7:38 a.m., Blueshirt wrote:
Idlehands wrote:
On 2024-11-21 2:37 a.m., Daniel70 wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 21/11/24 1:08 am:
Lying Idlehands claims to work for an essential service.
Wherever he works, I'm betting he does more actual work than
YOU do, Gobble-de-gook!!
I never said my work was "essential", I said binky would crap
his pants if he did know where I work.
Don't tell me you run a rival ISP that actually HAS customers?!
I told him years ago he should move away from dial-up modems...
but what can you do? <shrugs>
No I don't although for five years I did run one that not only ran
rings
around dial-up speeds it's monthly revenues would have made his head
spin.
AH!! Is that why Gobble-de-gook refers to you so disparagingly?? YOU
were the COMPETITION!!
but he quit.
Or did he get "Taken over" by one of the bigger boys, Gobble-de-
gook, .... one of the bigger boys who weren't interested in YOUR
miniscule little business, Gobble-de-gook??
Daniel70 wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 22/11/24 3:47 am:
The Pope does not represent Christianity.
Correct ..... just the MOST POPULUS strain of Christianity,
Gobble-de-gook.
Covid-19 was also a popular strain!
Plus, popular doesn't necessary equal right. :-)
Daniel70 wrote:
Blueshirt wrote on 20/11/24 9:27 pm:
Daniel70 wrote:
We've just gotten over "Black Friday" .... Even though the
13th wasn't a Friday!!
Er... "Black Friday" is the 29th November... so it's not over
yet.
Which means there's plenty of bargains to be had...
Er... I would seem I'm mistaken. Oh, well, shit happens!!
Yes, it does. Try not to make a habit of it though as you'll
only end up in the NotKnow catagory like somebody else here...
and we wouldn't want that now, would we?!
Or the mean people, like us, who just can't be bothered.
Grinchs of the world, UNITE!!
Unless you've children/grandchildren in the house the only good
thing about Christmas is the two weeks off work...
but then again, you're expected to go out and visit people whilst you're off... and if you don't, the fuckers will only arrive on...
<thinks>
I take it back, there's nothing good about Christmas...
The Doctor wrote on 22/11/24 11:15 pm:
In article <vhpmaa$14rnm$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
Idlehands wrote on 22/11/24 5:34 pm:
<Snip>
Binky believes his sect is the only "Christians" and will be the onlyThe thing that gets me, most, is that Gobble-de-gook is SOOOOOO Proud of >>> HIS little SECT that he will not even NAME the sect!!
ones going to Heaven. This "belief" allows him to heap scorn and hatred
on other sects and denominations and especially Muslims.
He really is a faux Christian wallowing in his ignorance.
Church of England?? Church of Scotland?? Methodist?? Salvation Army??
Eastern Orthodoxy?? .... Oh, No, there's the one ....
*Pentecostal/Charismatic* !!
All of which protests the Crimes of Rome!
The thing that gets me, most, is that Gobble-de-gook is SOOOOOO Proud of
HIS little SECT that he will not even NAME the sect!!
--
Daniel
The Doctor wrote on 22/11/24 11:15 pm:
In article <vhpllj$14oif$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 22/11/24 3:47 am:
In article <xn0otkual6fqbbb001@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <vhmupk$j6cl$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
Ah!! So YOU, Gobble-de-gook, are an Atheist, are you??
Nope and Anti-Papist!
Anti-something? Of course you are... that's your Christian way
isn't it?
The Pope does not represent Christianity.
Correct ..... just the MOST POPULUS strain of Christianity, Gobble-de-gook. >>>
Over One Billion Catholics .... at least in name!! Over 50% of those who >>> call themselves 'Christian' further call themselves 'Roman Catholic',
Gobble-de-gook??
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christian_population_growth
Where does YOUR version rank, Gobble-de-gook?? Down in the 'noise', I'm
guessing!
Still have not read Revelation 2, KJV?
WHY, Gobble-de-gook?? Does "Revelations" tell us where YOUR Church
ranks, does it,Gobble-de-gook??
So much for being kind to one another, forgiving one another (as
your god forgave you), loving your enemies and being good... etc.
Apologies from the Holy See first.
Apologies FOR WHAT, Gobble-de-gook?? Kicking YOU, Gobble-de-gook, out,
maybe!!
Crimes against christianity and humanity!
What Crimes were they, Gobble-de-gook, and why hasn't YOUR Police Force,
the RCMP, taken him to court, Gobble-de-gook??
Whoever taught you your religion didn't really do a good job,
did they?
Did 'they' really even try??
You revisionists.
What are 'WE' Revising, Gobble-de-gook??
--
Daniel
The Doctor wrote on 22/11/24 11:17 pm:
In article <vhpn6g$150kd$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
Idlehands wrote on 22/11/24 5:37 pm:
On 2024-11-21 7:38 a.m., Blueshirt wrote:AH!! Is that why Gobble-de-gook refers to you so disparagingly?? YOU
Idlehands wrote:
On 2024-11-21 2:37 a.m., Daniel70 wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 21/11/24 1:08 am:
Lying Idlehands claims to work for an essential service.
Wherever he works, I'm betting he does more actual work than
YOU do, Gobble-de-gook!!
I never said my work was "essential", I said binky would crap
his pants if he did know where I work.
Don't tell me you run a rival ISP that actually HAS customers?!
I told him years ago he should move away from dial-up modems...
but what can you do? <shrugs>
No I don't although for five years I did run one that not only ran rings >>>> around dial-up speeds it's monthly revenues would have made his head spin. >>>
were the COMPETITION!!
but he quit.
Or did he get "Taken over" by one of the bigger boys, Gobble-de-gook,
.... one of the bigger boys who weren't interested in YOUR miniscule
little business, Gobble-de-gook??
--
Daniel
The Doctor wrote on 22/11/24 11:18 pm:
In article <vhpnv3$154bs$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 22/11/24 12:57 am:
In article <vhn9eb$l19m$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
Blueshirt wrote on 21/11/24 9:25 pm:
Daniel70 wrote:
Blueshirt wrote on 20/11/24 9:27 pm:
<Snip>
Well, just as well YOU, Gobble-de-gook, have YOUR high power ISPOr the mean people, like us, who just can't be bothered.Grinchs of the world, UNITE!!
Unless you've children/grandchildren in the house the only good thing >>>>>> about Christmas is the two weeks off work
Being unemployed/Pensioned Off, that doesn't really matter to me .... >>>>> but "two weeks off"?? Here in Australia, four weeks annual leave is
standard .... most of which is taken in December/January/Summer!!
... but then again, you're expected to go out and visit people whilst >>>>>> you're off... and if you don't, the fuckers will only arrive on... >>>>>>
<thinks>
I take it back, there's nothing good about Christmas...
NO pension here.
business to keep YOU in cash in later life, Gobble-de-gook!!
So you exist off the state.
For having worked HARD for the State .... Yes!!
--
Daniel
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0otl26fpd8pb1000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Apologies from the Holy See first.
Dave, people can be kind to one another regardless of what
god they worship. Nobody needs a book written hundreds of
years ago to be nice. Yes, I know being nice isn't always
easy, but some of us do try!
If you want to claim you are a practising Christian you
should at least try and follow the message that your "lord"
preached...
Key word: God .
But what god? There seem to be so many... if I was looking to
buy-in to this god thing, how would I know which one is the real
deal? They all come highly recommended and there may even be
some 'special offers' to tempt me, but how do I know which one
is the genuine article and which one is the fake copy?
And how do you know that you haven't been cheated by being sold
the fake version?
Daniel70 wrote:
Idlehands wrote on 22/11/24 5:34 pm:
The thing that gets me, most, is that Gobble-de-gook is
Binky believes his sect is the only "Christians" and will be
the only ones going to Heaven. This "belief" allows him to
heap scorn and hatred on other sects and denominations and
especially Muslims.
He really is a faux Christian wallowing in his ignorance.
SOOOOOO Proud of HIS little SECT that he will not even NAME
the sect!!
The Church of the Holy Spook.
Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
You revisionists.
The KJV bible is a revison itself.
You arely know that?!
surely <-
The idiot insisted:
In article <vhq2ln$16sjj$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 22/11/24 11:15 pm:
In article <vhpllj$14oif$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 22/11/24 3:47 am:
Apologies from the Holy See first.
Apologies FOR WHAT, Gobble-de-gook?? Kicking YOU, Gobble-de-gook,
out, maybe!!
Crimes against christianity and humanity!
What Crimes were they, Gobble-de-gook, and why hasn't YOUR Police
Force, the RCMP, taken him to court, Gobble-de-gook??
You recall the Crusades?
The crusades were the RCMP arresting the Pope!?!
I think you just made that up, didn’t you?
--
solar penguin
The idiot insisted:
In article <vhq2ln$16sjj$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 22/11/24 11:15 pm:
In article <vhpllj$14oif$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 22/11/24 3:47 am:
Apologies from the Holy See first.
Apologies FOR WHAT, Gobble-de-gook?? Kicking YOU, Gobble-de-gook,
out, maybe!!
Crimes against christianity and humanity!
What Crimes were they, Gobble-de-gook, and why hasn't YOUR Police
Force, the RCMP, taken him to court, Gobble-de-gook??
You recall the Crusades?
The crusades were the RCMP arresting the Pope!?!
I think you just made that up, didn’t you?
Blueshirt wrote on 26/11/24 1:30 am:
Daniel70 wrote:Hmm! So Mrs Blueshirt was your Nanny!! Are you 'INTO' older women, then, >Blueshirt ..... or does "Mrs Blueshirt" have a different meaning in
Blueshirt wrote on 25/11/24 11:07 pm:
The Doctor wrote:I sure hope that's a JOKE, Blueshirt ..... else Mrs Blueshirt had
Have you been to a protestant church?
Probably, but I'm usually shaking too much to pay much attention
to my surroundings.
You do know my real name is Damien, right?
better watch out!!
Well, she seems happy enough... although she first came in to my life
as my Nanny when I was younger, with her Rotweiler... that I called
Dave. She's stuck around ever since to guide me on my path...
A nice woman.
your vocabulary??
--
Daniel
The Doctor wrote on 26/11/24 3:05 am:
In article <vi1u9j$2pjes$2@dont-email.me>,The Pagan SAW how much better it was to "follow" Catholic Rites and
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
Blueshirt wrote on 25/11/24 10:59 pm:
Your Name wrote:
On 2024-11-24 23:01:51 +0000, Blueshirt said:
The Doctor wrote:
And Idols of Jesus Christ and Mother MAry?
Most Christian churches have a depiction of a cross with
Jewsus on it somewhere within them as a symbol of the
crucifiction ... is that not idolatry?
Jewsus ... that must be the Jewish version.
Exactly!
Christianity derived from Judaism so it's apt.
I've typed it before and I'll type it again ....
"Christianity is a Jewish Sect!!"
Then how come Catholicism has major elements of paganry?
Rituals than to stay as Pagans, Gobble-de-gook, ... YOU know "Safety in >Numbers!!".
--
Daniel
The Doctor wrote on 26/11/24 3:01 am:
In article <vi1jbh$2nm85$2@dont-email.me>,So does YOUR Church (YOU know, Gobble-de-gook, the Church/Sect YOU, >Gobble-de-gook, are too EMBARASSED to name.) have any Pictures of Holy >People, Gobble-de-gook??
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 24/11/24 11:29 pm:
In article <vhv1sb$274u5$3@dont-email.me>, Daniel70
<daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 24/11/24 12:51 am:
In article <vhsbbr$1lurc$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel70
<daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 23/11/24 9:54 am:
<Snip>
WHAT "Idols of Jesus Christ and Mother MAry", Gobble-de-gook??Well I've got ZERO idea what "Ilols" are, Gobble-de-gook, so I'llAlso how many visible idols are ther in the RCC?
None, Gobble-de-gook!!
So no Ilols of Jesus Christ and Mother Mary in the RCC?
say *NO* !! -- Daniel
And Idols of Jesus Christ and Mother MAry?
I see them in Catholic Church upon visit.
Any Statues, Gobble-de-gook??
Any Crucifixes, Gobble-de-gook?? YOU know, like the Crucifix on which
Jesus was Crucified, Gobble-de-gook!!
Any thing at all that distinguishes it from a basically empty building, >Gobble-de-gook??
--
Daniel
The Doctor wrote:
In article <vi2s4r$31hh3$2@dont-email.me>,
Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:
On 2024-11-25 19:52:26 +0000, Blueshirt said:
The Doctor wrote:
True Christianty.
Now there's an oxymoron if ever there was...
All religions are full of morons. ;-p
Atheist is complete with idiots.
So you say Dave, but you never really back that statement up
with evidence on how Atheists are idiots, do you?
In fact, when you do try and make any statement here about your
faith it's usually you that ends up looking like an idiot.
I'd say fellow Christians wince and cringe at your idiocy
sometimes. So maybe you should learn to shut up about your
nonsensical beliefs?
The idiot insisted:
In article <vi2s4r$31hh3$2@dont-email.me>,
Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:
All religions are full of morons. ;-p
Atheist is complete with idiots.
There’s only one poster here who’s known as “the idiot.”
Does that make you an atheist?
--
solar penguin
Daniel70 wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 26/11/24 3:05 am:
The Pagan SAW how much better it was to "follow" Catholic
Then how come Catholicism has major elements of paganry?
Rites and Rituals than to stay as Pagans, Gobble-de-gook, ...
YOU know "Safety in Numbers!!".
Or as more likely, the Pagan's saw how friendly the Christian's
actually were so they decided to follow suit and convert... as
opposed to being persecuted and killed for not believing in some
Jewish fella nailed to a cross.
Charlemagne didn't go through Europe handing out "Jesus Saves"
leaflets and offering free tea and biscuits to any Saxons who
wanted to become Christian, did he? (Massacre of Verden etc.)
The idiot insisted:
In article <vi4jab$3fha5$1@dont-email.me>,
solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
The idiot insisted:
Atheist is complete with idiots.
There’s only one poster here who’s known as “the idiot.”
Does that make you an atheist?
Now you get into paradoxes SP.
Liar! I’m not getting into any such thing!
--
solar penguin
The Holy bible forbids Pagan rituals in the Church!
Daniel70 wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 26/11/24 3:05 am:
Then how come Catholicism has major elements of paganry?
The Pagan SAW how much better it was to "follow" Catholic
Rites and Rituals than to stay as Pagans, Gobble-de-gook, ...
YOU know "Safety in Numbers!!".
Or as more likely, the Pagan's saw how friendly the Christian's
actually were so they decided to follow suit and convert... as
opposed to being persecuted and killed for not believing in some
Jewish fella nailed to a cross.
Charlemagne didn't go through Europe handing out "Jesus Saves"
leaflets and offering free tea and biscuits to any Saxons who
wanted to become Christian, did he? (Massacre of Verden etc.)
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0otrtrpw5x6fb003@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
Hmm! So Mrs Blueshirt was your Nanny!! Are you 'INTO' older
women, then, Blueshirt ..... or does "Mrs Blueshirt" have a
different meaning in your vocabulary??
There's nothing wrong with older women!!! Nanna Baylock was
great, she taught me everything I needed to know about
life... I also happen to like Rotweilers.
I love my dogs and cats.
That's your own business... I say live and let live.
On 2024-11-26 13:17:18 +0000, Blueshirt said:
Daniel70 wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 26/11/24 3:05 am:
Then how come Catholicism has major elements of paganry?
The Pagan SAW how much better it was to "follow" Catholic
Rites and Rituals than to stay as Pagans, Gobble-de-gook, ...
YOU know "Safety in Numbers!!".
Or as more likely, the Pagan's saw how friendly the Christian's
actually were so they decided to follow suit and convert... as
opposed to being persecuted and killed for not believing in some
Jewish fella nailed to a cross.
Charlemagne didn't go through Europe handing out "Jesus Saves"
leaflets and offering free tea and biscuits to any Saxons who
wanted to become Christian, did he? (Massacre of Verden etc.)
Nope. They systematically went around trying to force people to convert
to their idiotic religion of Christianity.
In one case the Christian church even proclaimed they had converted an
entire island of pagans/heathens ... the reality was that they had in
fact killed all the inhabitants and simply taken over the island with
their own church people.
Some of theses religious morons still go around trying to force people
to convert, although mostly less violently. Covid rules stopped the >door-knocking morons for a while, but they back again now.
In article <xn0ots3s8dwq9cz001@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
The Holy bible forbids Pagan rituals in the Church!
Is that so? Well, if I was a Pagan I'd go in to the local
church one quiet afternoon, chant "Hail to the Alfather
Odin!" and carry out Pagan rituals just for the fun of it
then.
I dare you!
On 2024-11-26 13:17:18 +0000, Blueshirt said:
Charlemagne didn't go through Europe handing out "Jesus
Saves" leaflets and offering free tea and biscuits to any
Saxons who wanted to become Christian, did he?
Nope. They systematically went around trying to force people
to convert to their idiotic religion of Christianity.
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0ots3zkdwvr00002@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
There are good examples everyday of Atheists as Idiots.
And there are good examples here everyday of a Christian
idiot.
Doing an SP?
No Dave, you just make it so easy...
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0ots3s8dwq9cz001@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
The Holy bible forbids Pagan rituals in the Church!
Is that so? Well, if I was a Pagan I'd go in to the local
church one quiet afternoon, chant "Hail to the Alfather
Odin!" and carry out Pagan rituals just for the fun of it
then.
I dare you!
Who do you think would stop me? Do you think churches in rural
Ireland have security guards or something? They are open all day
(well, most of the day anyway) for people to go inside and light
their stupid candles, anyone can go in and say "Hail the
Alfather Odin!" if they wanted to. Nobody is going to get struck
down by a bolt of ligthening from the sky for doing so.
(Especially as the dude responsible for that sort of thing is
Odin's son!)
The thing is Dave, I don't actually believe in Odin, hence, "If
I was a Pagan".
Pay attention.
Your Name wrote:
On 2024-11-26 13:17:18 +0000, Blueshirt said:
Charlemagne didn't go through Europe handing out "Jesus
Saves" leaflets and offering free tea and biscuits to any
Saxons who wanted to become Christian, did he?
Nope. They systematically went around trying to force people
to convert to their idiotic religion of Christianity.
So much for being a peaceful religion!
The Christian church was built on the blodshed of others. It
wouldn't have got so big otherwise.
In article <vi473e$3dfpd$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 26/11/24 3:05 am:
In article <vi1u9j$2pjes$2@dont-email.me>, Daniel70The Pagan SAW how much better it was to "follow" Catholic Rites
<daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
Blueshirt wrote on 25/11/24 10:59 pm:
Your Name wrote:
On 2024-11-24 23:01:51 +0000, Blueshirt said:
The Doctor wrote:
And Idols of Jesus Christ and Mother MAry?
Most Christian churches have a depiction of a cross with
Jewsus on it somewhere within them as a symbol of the
crucifiction ... is that not idolatry?
Jewsus ... that must be the Jewish version.
Exactly!
Christianity derived from Judaism so it's apt.
I've typed it before and I'll type it again ....
"Christianity is a Jewish Sect!!"
Then how come Catholicism has major elements of paganry?
and Rituals than to stay as Pagans, Gobble-de-gook, ... YOU know
"Safety in Numbers!!".
The Holy bible forbids Pagan rituals in the Church!
In article <vi47gn$3dhof$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 26/11/24 3:01 am:
In article <vi1jbh$2nm85$2@dont-email.me>,So does YOUR Church (YOU know, Gobble-de-gook, the Church/Sect YOU,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 24/11/24 11:29 pm:
In article <vhv1sb$274u5$3@dont-email.me>, Daniel70
<daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 24/11/24 12:51 am:
In article <vhsbbr$1lurc$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel70
<daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 23/11/24 9:54 am:
<Snip>
WHAT "Idols of Jesus Christ and Mother MAry", Gobble-de-gook??Well I've got ZERO idea what "Ilols" are, Gobble-de-gook, so I'llAlso how many visible idols are ther in the RCC?
None, Gobble-de-gook!!
So no Ilols of Jesus Christ and Mother Mary in the RCC?
say *NO* !! -- Daniel
And Idols of Jesus Christ and Mother MAry?
I see them in Catholic Church upon visit.
Gobble-de-gook, are too EMBARASSED to name.) have any Pictures of Holy
People, Gobble-de-gook??
Any Statues, Gobble-de-gook??
Any Crucifixes, Gobble-de-gook?? YOU know, like the Crucifix on which
Jesus was Crucified, Gobble-de-gook!!
Without the body of Christ.
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0otrtivw5ke6b002@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Atheist is complete with idiots.
So you say Dave, but you never really back that statement up
with evidence on how Atheists are idiots, do you?
In fact, when you do try and make any statement here about
your faith it's usually you that ends up looking like an
idiot. I'd say fellow Christians wince and cringe at your
idiocy sometimes. So maybe you should learn to shut up about
your nonsensical beliefs?
There are good examples everyday of Atheists as Idiots.
And there are good examples here everyday of a Christian idiot.
On 2024-11-27 01:01:58 +0000, Blueshirt said:
The Christian church was built on the blodshed of others. It
wouldn't have got so big otherwise.
There are fanatical lunatics in pretty much every religion ...
including the soccer hooligans. :-p
Most of the believers of every religion are almost normal
people, but just stupidly believe in the mumbo-jumbo idiocy
spouted by the conmen in the church rather than using their
own brains.
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0ots40kdwx7wy003@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
I love my dogs and cats.
That's your own business... I say live and let live.
3 cats are fun.
One pussy is enough for any man, three is just being greedy.
On 2024-11-27 01:01:58 +0000, Blueshirt said:
Your Name wrote:
On 2024-11-26 13:17:18 +0000, Blueshirt said:
Charlemagne didn't go through Europe handing out "Jesus
Saves" leaflets and offering free tea and biscuits to any
Saxons who wanted to become Christian, did he?
Nope. They systematically went around trying to force people
to convert to their idiotic religion of Christianity.
So much for being a peaceful religion!
The Christian church was built on the blodshed of others. It
wouldn't have got so big otherwise.
There are fanatical lunatics in pretty much every religion ...
including the soccer hooligans. :-p
Most of the believers of every religion are almost normal people, but
just stupidly believe in the mumbo-jumbo idiocy spouted by the conmen
in the church rather than using their own brains.
Blueshirt wrote on 27/11/2024 7:15 am:
The Doctor wrote:"good examples"?? Oh!! Of an idiot, of course!!
In article <xn0otrtivw5ke6b002@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Atheist is complete with idiots.
So you say Dave, but you never really back that statement up
with evidence on how Atheists are idiots, do you?
In fact, when you do try and make any statement here about
your faith it's usually you that ends up looking like an
idiot. I'd say fellow Christians wince and cringe at your
idiocy sometimes. So maybe you should learn to shut up about
your nonsensical beliefs?
There are good examples everyday of Atheists as Idiots.
And there are good examples here everyday of a Christian idiot.
--
Daniel
Your Name wrote:
On 2024-11-27 01:01:58 +0000, Blueshirt said:
The Christian church was built on the blodshed of others. It
wouldn't have got so big otherwise.
There are fanatical lunatics in pretty much every religion ...
including the soccer hooligans. :-p
Football hooligans are not trying to convert others... they are
just trying to punish them for supporting the other team! As a
Chelsea fan I don't go around trying to make everyone become
Chelsea fans.
Although after saying that... everyone is welcome to wear that
beautiful blue shirt with love and pride if they so wish.
Most of the believers of every religion are almost normal
people, but just stupidly believe in the mumbo-jumbo idiocy
spouted by the conmen in the church rather than using their
own brains.
I note you use the word most. Is that because there is an
example of 'not normal' that we are all familiar with here? :-)
In article <xn0otso0i5to0q002@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0ots3zkdwvr00002@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
There are good examples everyday of Atheists as Idiots.
And there are good examples here everyday of a Christian
idiot.
Doing an SP?
No Dave, you just make it so easy...
You are doing an SP!
In article <xn0otsoic6ec4h006@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Christian church was built on the blodshed of others. It
wouldn't have got so big otherwise.
exactly! Forced conversion goes against the Word of the Lord!
And those who misrepresent Christ ...
The fools who cannot critically think.
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0otso0i5to0q002@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0ots3zkdwvr00002@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
There are good examples everyday of Atheists as Idiots.
And there are good examples here everyday of a Christian
idiot.
Doing an SP?
No Dave, you just make it so easy...
You are doing an SP!
No Dave, it's just we are both able to put the ball in to the
net when we see an open goal, that's all.
As I said, you make it so easy...
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0otsoic6ec4h006@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Christian church was built on the blodshed of others. It
wouldn't have got so big otherwise.
exactly! Forced conversion goes against the Word of the Lord!
The alleged word of the Lord!
Although I can quite believe that there might have been a man
going around the middle-east teaching peace... it's just a pity
that his followers throughout the ages didn't understand the
message.
But judging by your regular comments here about the RC Church,
if you had any bit of power in the middle-ages after the
reformation it would be YOU executing the "papists" for heresy.
As you are every bit as fundamentalist as them.
The Doctor wrote:
And those who misrepresent Christ ...
Take a look in the mirror!
In article <xn0otta6txnwc6t002@news.eternal-september.org>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
You are doing an SP!
No Dave, it's just we are both able to put the ball in to the
net when we see an open goal, that's all.
As I said, you make it so easy...
Wich CL gmes did you catch this week?
In article <xn0ottagcxoa35u003@news.eternal-september.org>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
But judging by your regular comments here about the RC
Church, if you had any bit of power in the middle-ages after
the reformation it would be YOU executing the "papists" for
heresy. As you are every bit as fundamentalist as them.
Execute? Is it the other way around.
Your Name wrote:
On 2024-11-27 01:01:58 +0000, Blueshirt said:
The Christian church was built on the blodshed of others. It
wouldn't have got so big otherwise.
There are fanatical lunatics in pretty much every religion ...
including the soccer hooligans. :-p
Football hooligans are not trying to convert others... they are
just trying to punish them for supporting the other team! As a
Chelsea fan I don't go around trying to make everyone become
Chelsea fans.
Although after saying that... everyone is welcome to wear that
beautiful blue shirt with love and pride if they so wish.
Most of the believers of every religion are almost normal
people, but just stupidly believe in the mumbo-jumbo idiocy
spouted by the conmen in the church rather than using their
own brains.
I note you use the word most. Is that because there is an
example of 'not normal' that we are all familiar with here? :-)
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0otta6txnwc6t002@news.eternal-september.org>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
You are doing an SP!
No Dave, it's just we are both able to put the ball in to the
net when we see an open goal, that's all.
As I said, you make it so easy...
Wich CL gmes did you catch this week?
Manchester City's game last night.
On 2024-11-27 13:17:58 +0000, Blueshirt said:
Your Name wrote:
On 2024-11-27 01:01:58 +0000, Blueshirt said:
The Christian church was built on the blodshed of others. It
wouldn't have got so big otherwise.
There are fanatical lunatics in pretty much every religion ...
including the soccer hooligans. :-p
Football hooligans are not trying to convert others... they are
just trying to punish them for supporting the other team! As a
Chelsea fan I don't go around trying to make everyone become
Chelsea fans.
Although after saying that... everyone is welcome to wear that
beautiful blue shirt with love and pride if they so wish.
Most of the believers of every religion are almost normal
people, but just stupidly believe in the mumbo-jumbo idiocy
spouted by the conmen in the church rather than using their
own brains.
I note you use the word most. Is that because there is an
example of 'not normal' that we are all familiar with here? :-)
That too, but I eally meant "most" as in the majority who are not the >fanatical lunatics.
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0ottagcxoa35u003@news.eternal-september.org>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
But judging by your regular comments here about the RC
Church, if you had any bit of power in the middle-ages after
the reformation it would be YOU executing the "papists" for
heresy. As you are every bit as fundamentalist as them.
Execute? Is it the other way around.
It went both ways! Two extreme groups of Christians killing one
another - so much for a religion about peace and love.
That's two groups of people who worship the same god! Which is
why religion is all a load of hypocritical bull.
On 2024-11-26 5:54 p.m., Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0ots40kdwx7wy003@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
I love my dogs and cats.
That's your own business... I say live and let live.
3 cats are fun.
One pussy is enough for any man, three is just being greedy.
The only way binky would get near three "pussy" like that is if was in a morgue.
Your Name wrote:
On 2024-11-27 01:01:58 +0000, Blueshirt said:
The Christian church was built on the blodshed of others. It
wouldn't have got so big otherwise.
There are fanatical lunatics in pretty much every religion ...
including the soccer hooligans. :-p
Football hooligans are not trying to convert others... they are just
trying to punish them for supporting the other team!
As a Chelsea fan I don't go around trying to make everyone become
Chelsea fans.
Although after saying that... everyone is welcome to wear that
beautiful blue shirt with love and pride if they so wish.
Most of the believers of every religion are almost normal people,
but just stupidly believe in the mumbo-jumbo idiocy spouted by the
conmen in the church rather than using their own brains.
I note you use the word most. Is that because there is an example of
'not normal' that we are all familiar with here? :-)
In article <xn0ottahoxoc2ox004@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
And those who misrepresent Christ ...
Take a look in the mirror!
You might need to mix your broken mirror.
In article <vi6tbn$3vea5$2@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 27/11/2024 1:37 am:
In article <vi47gn$3dhof$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
So does YOUR Church (YOU know, Gobble-de-gook, the Church/Sect YOU,
Gobble-de-gook, are too EMBARASSED to name.) have any Pictures of Holy >>>> People, Gobble-de-gook??
Any Statues, Gobble-de-gook??
Any Crucifixes, Gobble-de-gook?? YOU know, like the Crucifix on which
Jesus was Crucified, Gobble-de-gook!!
Without the body of Christ.
Ah!! So 'they' DO have idols, then, Gobble-de-gook!!
I still prefer the Empty Tomb.
In article <xn0ottf38s1v1003@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0ottagcxoa35u003@news.eternal-september.org>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
But judging by your regular comments here about the RC
Church, if you had any bit of power in the middle-ages after
the reformation it would be YOU executing the "papists" for
heresy. As you are every bit as fundamentalist as them.
Execute? Is it the other way around.
It went both ways! Two extreme groups of Christians killing one
another - so much for a religion about peace and love.
That's two groups of people who worship the same god! Which is
why religion is all a load of hypocritical bull.
Well what about Christianty merge with paganism?
That is the paedophile problem.
Idlehands wrote on 28/11/24 12:51 am:^^^^^<-Paedophile talker noted.
On 2024-11-26 5:54 p.m., Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0ots40kdwx7wy003@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
I love my dogs and cats.
That's your own business... I say live and let live.
3 cats are fun.
One pussy is enough for any man, three is just being greedy.
The only way binky would get near three "pussy" like that is if was in a
^^^^^^<-necrophile talker noted.morgue.
Concur!! ;-P
--
Daniel
Blueshirt wrote on 28/11/24 12:17 am:
Your Name wrote:
On 2024-11-27 01:01:58 +0000, Blueshirt said:
The Christian church was built on the blodshed of others. It
wouldn't have got so big otherwise.
There are fanatical lunatics in pretty much every religion ...
including the soccer hooligans. :-p
Football hooligans are not trying to convert others... they are just
trying to punish them for supporting the other team!
Yes .... so the ONLY way 'they' will stop 'punishing' the supporters of
the other teams .... is by CONVERTING them from the other team to the
RIGHT team!!
As a Chelsea fan I don't go around trying to make everyone become
Chelsea fans.
You may not, doesn't mean NO Chelsea followers don't!!
Although after saying that... everyone is welcome to wear that
beautiful blue shirt with love and pride if they so wish.
SEE! Some do the 'conversion' physically, others do it mentally!!
Most of the believers of every religion are almost normal people,
but just stupidly believe in the mumbo-jumbo idiocy spouted by the
conmen in the church rather than using their own brains.
I note you use the word most. Is that because there is an example of
'not normal' that we are all familiar with here? :-)
Correct!
--
Daniel
The Doctor wrote on 28/11/24 12:00 pm:
In article <xn0ottf38s1v1003@post.eweka.nl>,Say WHAT??
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0ottagcxoa35u003@news.eternal-september.org>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
But judging by your regular comments here about the RC
Church, if you had any bit of power in the middle-ages after
the reformation it would be YOU executing the "papists" for
heresy. As you are every bit as fundamentalist as them.
Execute? Is it the other way around.
It went both ways! Two extreme groups of Christians killing one
another - so much for a religion about peace and love.
That's two groups of people who worship the same god! Which is
why religion is all a load of hypocritical bull.
Well what about Christianty merge with paganism?
YOU do realise, don't YOU, Gobble-de-gook, that, INITIALLY, there was
ONE person who believed in Christ ..... Christ himself!!
He then "converted" about a dozen Jews into Christians, The Apostles,
and about six dozen other, less-intense, followers, the Disciples,
probably all Jews as well, into Christians.
Eventually, presumably because it was soooo popular, the Christian
movement allowed others (pagans, etc) to CONVERT into The Christian Faith.
Next time YOU, Gobble-de-gook, actually go to YOUR Church (whichever
breed it is) YOU, Gobble-de-gook, could ask YOUR Minister about what
I've typed above, Gobble-de-gook .... and then let me/us know where I'm
wrong in my Christian upbringing!!
That is the paedophile problem.
What is this 'paedophile problem' YOU, Gobble-de-gook, keep carring on >about??
Sure, in The Roman Catholic Church, being made up of all sorts of
people, there, unfortunately, are 'paedophile', just as I'm SURE in The >Church of England, The Church of Scotland, The Methodists, The Salvation >Army, The Hindus, The Buddhists, AND WHATEVER BREED OF CHRISTIANITY YOU >Gobble-de-gook belong to, etc., etc,. *THERE ARE* unfortunately, >*PAEDOPHILES* , Gobble-de-gook. There are unfortunately Paedophiles all
over the world, Gobble-de-gook!!
It's not just a problem in the Roman Catholic Church, Gobble-de-gook
.... Why do YOU, Gobble-de-gook, think The Church of England, amongst
other Christian Religions, started to allow their (MALE) MINISTERS to
marry (in the 70's was it??).... and even allowed WOMEN MINISTERS??
--
Daniel
The Doctor wrote on 28/11/24 1:38 am:
In article <vi6tbn$3vea5$2@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 27/11/2024 1:37 am:
In article <vi47gn$3dhof$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
<Snip>
Doesn't really matter WHAT YOU, Gobble-de-gook, prefer!!So does YOUR Church (YOU know, Gobble-de-gook, the Church/Sect YOU,
Gobble-de-gook, are too EMBARASSED to name.) have any Pictures of Holy >>>>> People, Gobble-de-gook??
Any Statues, Gobble-de-gook??
Any Crucifixes, Gobble-de-gook?? YOU know, like the Crucifix on which >>>>> Jesus was Crucified, Gobble-de-gook!!
Without the body of Christ.
Ah!! So 'they' DO have idols, then, Gobble-de-gook!!
I still prefer the Empty Tomb.
--
Daniel
In article <vi9h1f$gi76$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 28/11/24 12:00 pm:
In article <xn0ottf38s1v1003@post.eweka.nl>,Say WHAT??
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0ottagcxoa35u003@news.eternal-september.org>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
But judging by your regular comments here about the RC
Church, if you had any bit of power in the middle-ages after
the reformation it would be YOU executing the "papists" for
heresy. As you are every bit as fundamentalist as them.
Execute? Is it the other way around.
It went both ways! Two extreme groups of Christians killing one
another - so much for a religion about peace and love.
That's two groups of people who worship the same god! Which is
why religion is all a load of hypocritical bull.
Well what about Christianty merge with paganism?
YOU do realise, don't YOU, Gobble-de-gook, that, INITIALLY, there was
ONE person who believed in Christ ..... Christ himself!!
He then "converted" about a dozen Jews into Christians, The Apostles,
and about six dozen other, less-intense, followers, the Disciples,
probably all Jews as well, into Christians.
Eventually, presumably because it was soooo popular, the Christian
movement allowed others (pagans, etc) to CONVERT into The Christian Faith. >>
Next time YOU, Gobble-de-gook, actually go to YOUR Church (whichever
breed it is) YOU, Gobble-de-gook, could ask YOUR Minister about what
I've typed above, Gobble-de-gook .... and then let me/us know where I'm
wrong in my Christian upbringing!!
That is the paedophile problem.
What is this 'paedophile problem' YOU, Gobble-de-gook, keep carring on
about??
Sure, in The Roman Catholic Church, being made up of all sorts of
people, there, unfortunately, are 'paedophile', just as I'm SURE in The
Church of England, The Church of Scotland, The Methodists, The Salvation
Army, The Hindus, The Buddhists, AND WHATEVER BREED OF CHRISTIANITY YOU
Gobble-de-gook belong to, etc., etc,. *THERE ARE* unfortunately,
*PAEDOPHILES* , Gobble-de-gook. There are unfortunately Paedophiles all
over the world, Gobble-de-gook!!
It's not just a problem in the Roman Catholic Church, Gobble-de-gook
.... Why do YOU, Gobble-de-gook, think The Church of England, amongst
other Christian Religions, started to allow their (MALE) MINISTERS to
marry (in the 70's was it??).... and even allowed WOMEN MINISTERS??
At the Throne of Judgment , many a pope will be thrown into the Lake of Fire.
In article <vi9hos$glhs$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
Blueshirt wrote on 28/11/24 12:17 am:
Your Name wrote:
On 2024-11-27 01:01:58 +0000, Blueshirt said:
The Christian church was built on the blodshed of others. It
wouldn't have got so big otherwise.
There are fanatical lunatics in pretty much every religion ...
including the soccer hooligans. :-p
Football hooligans are not trying to convert others... they are just
trying to punish them for supporting the other team!
Yes .... so the ONLY way 'they' will stop 'punishing' the supporters of
the other teams .... is by CONVERTING them from the other team to the
RIGHT team!!
As a Chelsea fan I don't go around trying to make everyone become
Chelsea fans.
You may not, doesn't mean NO Chelsea followers don't!!
chelsea is my number 2 team.
Arsenal being my number 1 team!
And then there is the Football axis of evil.
Although after saying that... everyone is welcome to wear that
beautiful blue shirt with love and pride if they so wish.
SEE! Some do the 'conversion' physically, others do it mentally!!
Most of the believers of every religion are almost normal people,
but just stupidly believe in the mumbo-jumbo idiocy spouted by the
conmen in the church rather than using their own brains.
I note you use the word most. Is that because there is an example of
'not normal' that we are all familiar with here? :-)
Correct!
You need to cut through the lies the get to the truth.
In article <vi9hu0$glhs$2@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 28/11/24 2:42 am:
In article <xn0ottahoxoc2ox004@post.eweka.nl>,What should Blueshirt *mix* his 'broken' mirror with, Gobble-de-gook??
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
And those who misrepresent Christ ...
Take a look in the mirror!
You might need to mix your broken mirror.
Glue.
The Doctor wrote on 28/11/24 10:40 pm:
In article <vi9h1f$gi76$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 28/11/24 12:00 pm:
In article <xn0ottf38s1v1003@post.eweka.nl>,Say WHAT??
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0ottagcxoa35u003@news.eternal-september.org>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
But judging by your regular comments here about the RC
Church, if you had any bit of power in the middle-ages after
the reformation it would be YOU executing the "papists" for
heresy. As you are every bit as fundamentalist as them.
Execute? Is it the other way around.
It went both ways! Two extreme groups of Christians killing one
another - so much for a religion about peace and love.
That's two groups of people who worship the same god! Which is
why religion is all a load of hypocritical bull.
Well what about Christianty merge with paganism?
YOU do realise, don't YOU, Gobble-de-gook, that, INITIALLY, there was
ONE person who believed in Christ ..... Christ himself!!
He then "converted" about a dozen Jews into Christians, The Apostles,
and about six dozen other, less-intense, followers, the Disciples,
probably all Jews as well, into Christians.
Eventually, presumably because it was soooo popular, the Christian
movement allowed others (pagans, etc) to CONVERT into The Christian Faith. >>>
Next time YOU, Gobble-de-gook, actually go to YOUR Church (whichever
breed it is) YOU, Gobble-de-gook, could ask YOUR Minister about what
I've typed above, Gobble-de-gook .... and then let me/us know where I'm
wrong in my Christian upbringing!!
That is the paedophile problem.
What is this 'paedophile problem' YOU, Gobble-de-gook, keep carring on
about??
Sure, in The Roman Catholic Church, being made up of all sorts of
people, there, unfortunately, are 'paedophile', just as I'm SURE in The
Church of England, The Church of Scotland, The Methodists, The Salvation >>> Army, The Hindus, The Buddhists, AND WHATEVER BREED OF CHRISTIANITY YOU
Gobble-de-gook belong to, etc., etc,. *THERE ARE* unfortunately,
*PAEDOPHILES* , Gobble-de-gook. There are unfortunately Paedophiles all
over the world, Gobble-de-gook!!
It's not just a problem in the Roman Catholic Church, Gobble-de-gook
.... Why do YOU, Gobble-de-gook, think The Church of England, amongst
other Christian Religions, started to allow their (MALE) MINISTERS to
marry (in the 70's was it??).... and even allowed WOMEN MINISTERS??
At the Throne of Judgment , many a pope will be thrown into the Lake of Fire.
FAILURE TO ANSWER QUESTIONS ASKED ...... NOTED!!
So are YOU, Gobble-de-gook, against ALL CATHOLICS .... or just The Pope >himself, Gobble-de-gook??
--
Daniel
The Doctor wrote on 28/11/24 10:42 pm:
In article <vi9hu0$glhs$2@dont-email.me>,FAILURE TO READ *CORRECTLY* NOTED ..... FAIL!!
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 28/11/24 2:42 am:
In article <xn0ottahoxoc2ox004@post.eweka.nl>,What should Blueshirt *mix* his 'broken' mirror with, Gobble-de-gook??
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
And those who misrepresent Christ ...
Take a look in the mirror!
You might need to mix your broken mirror.
Glue.
--
Daniel
Blueshirt wrote on 28/11/24 12:17 am:
Your Name wrote:
There are fanatical lunatics in pretty much every religion
... including the soccer hooligans. :-p
Football hooligans are not trying to convert others... they
are just trying to punish them for supporting the other team!
Yes .... so the ONLY way 'they' will stop 'punishing' the
supporters of the other teams .... is by CONVERTING them from
the other team to the RIGHT team!!
As a Chelsea fan I don't go around trying to make everyone
become Chelsea fans.
You may not, doesn't mean NO Chelsea followers don't!!
Christ is not on the cross nor is he in the tomb!
chelsea is my number 2 team.
Arsenal being my number 1 team!
And then there is the Football axis of evil.
The idiot insisted:
In article <vi9q6g$i3en$2@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 28/11/24 10:42 pm:
In article <vi9hu0$glhs$2@dont-email.me>,FAILURE TO READ *CORRECTLY* NOTED ..... FAIL!!
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 28/11/24 2:42 am:Glue.
What should Blueshirt *mix* his 'broken' mirror with, Gobble-de-gook?? >>>>
You might need to mix your broken mirror.
Failure of dannyboy to comprehaned the answer noted!
Failure to proof-read your post before sending noted!
--
solar penguin
The idiot insisted:
In article <vi9q4g$i3en$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 28/11/24 10:42 pm:
You need to cut through the lies the get to the truth.
RIGHT!! So marking ALL your posts, Gobble-de-gook, I will be
cutting through/out ALL the lies, and what is left is TRUTH!!
Fine!!
As the Master said in Trial of a Timelord.
Liar! The Master didn’t say anything about marking your posts!
--
solar penguin
The Doctor wrote:
chelsea is my number 2 team.
Please don't upset me today Dave!
Arsenal being my number 1 team!
Imagine supporting a team whose name starts with Arse... does
that make its followers Arses?
And then there is the Football axis of evil.
The North London axis of evil you mean; the Arse and Tottenham!
The Doctor wrote:
Christ is not on the cross nor is he in the tomb!
After 2000 years (approx) I wouldn't expect him to be!
In article <xn0otuoej2eu2aw00b@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
We don't want everyone becoming Chelsea fans... you'd never
get any tickets!
You just to need to build a bigger stadium!
In article <vi9psv$i1r8$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 28/11/24 10:40 pm:
At the Throne of Judgment , many a pope will be thrown into the
Lake of Fire.
FAILURE TO ANSWER QUESTIONS ASKED ...... NOTED!!
So are YOU, Gobble-de-gook, against ALL CATHOLICS .... or just The
Pope himself, Gobble-de-gook??
The Holy See.
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0otuo752ejb8g009@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Christ is not on the cross nor is he in the tomb!
After 2000 years (approx) I wouldn't expect him to be!
And not decomposing.
Oh he decomposed Dave, into nothing but dust. Like all of our
dead bodies will one day in the future. (Unless we choose
cremation of course.)
The Doctor wrote on 29/11/24 12:24 am:
In article <vi9psv$i1r8$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel70
<daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 28/11/24 10:40 pm:
<Snip>
At the Throne of Judgment , many a pope will be thrown into the
Lake of Fire.
FAILURE TO ANSWER QUESTIONS ASKED ...... NOTED!!
So are YOU, Gobble-de-gook, against ALL CATHOLICS .... or just The
Pope himself, Gobble-de-gook??
The Holy See.
WHY??
--
Daniel
In article <xn0otvx0u3m8oa4002@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0otuo752ejb8g009@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Christ is not on the cross nor is he in the tomb!
After 2000 years (approx) I wouldn't expect him to be!
And not decomposing.
Oh he decomposed Dave, into nothing but dust. Like all of our
dead bodies will one day in the future. (Unless we choose
cremation of course.)
You lie!
In article <vicacf$12pns$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 29/11/24 12:24 am:
The Holy See.
WHY??
Becuase they mislead.
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0otvx0u3m8oa4002@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0otuo752ejb8g009@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Christ is not on the cross nor is he in the tomb!
After 2000 years (approx) I wouldn't expect him to be!
And not decomposing.
Oh he decomposed Dave, into nothing but dust. Like all of our
dead bodies will one day in the future. (Unless we choose
cremation of course.)
You lie!
No Dave, I'm afraid I didn't.
Whoever educated you clearly lied to you though.
The Doctor wrote:
In article <vicacf$12pns$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 29/11/24 12:24 am:
The Holy See.
WHY??
Becuase they mislead.
BREAKING NEWS
All religious leaders mislead... because it is all made up
mumbo-jumbo to subjugate gullible people with simple minds.
In article <xn0otw3yl2pryu1007@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Becuase they mislead.
BREAKING NEWS
All religious leaders mislead... because it is all made up
mumbo-jumbo to subjugate gullible people with simple minds.
You mislead yourself BS.
The Doctor wrote:
In article <vicacf$12pns$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 29/11/24 12:24 am:
The Holy See.
WHY??
Becuase they mislead.
BREAKING NEWS
All religious leaders mislead... because it is all made up
mumbo-jumbo to subjugate gullible people with simple minds.
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0otvx0u3m8oa4002@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0otuo752ejb8g009@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Christ is not on the cross nor is he in the tomb!
After 2000 years (approx) I wouldn't expect him to be!
And not decomposing.
Oh he decomposed Dave, into nothing but dust. Like all of our
dead bodies will one day in the future. (Unless we choose
cremation of course.)
You lie!
No Dave, I'm afraid I didn't.
Whoever educated you clearly lied to you though.
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0otw3yl2pryu1007@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Becuase they mislead.
BREAKING NEWS
All religious leaders mislead... because it is all made up
mumbo-jumbo to subjugate gullible people with simple minds.
You mislead yourself BS.
No Dave, I am a reasonably educated person... I question things
I am told that don't make sense! I don't go baa baa and blindly
follow.
On 2024-11-29 15:08:26 +0000, Blueshirt said:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <vicacf$12pns$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 29/11/24 12:24 am:
The Holy See.
WHY??
Becuase they mislead.
BREAKING NEWS
All religious leaders mislead... because it is all made up
mumbo-jumbo to subjugate gullible people with simple minds.
+infinite!
Yep. The "church", in all it's various forms of silly religion, is
simply the biggest scam on the planet.
In article <vicacf$12pns$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 29/11/24 12:24 am:
In article <vi9psv$i1r8$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel70
<daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 28/11/24 10:40 pm:
<Snip>
At the Throne of Judgment , many a pope will be thrown into the
Lake of Fire.
FAILURE TO ANSWER QUESTIONS ASKED ...... NOTED!!
So are YOU, Gobble-de-gook, against ALL CATHOLICS .... or just The
Pope himself, Gobble-de-gook??
The Holy See.
WHY??
Becuase they mislead.
On 2024-11-29 8:03 a.m., Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0otvx0u3m8oa4002@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0otuo752ejb8g009@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Christ is not on the cross nor is he in the tomb!
After 2000 years (approx) I wouldn't expect him to be!
And not decomposing.
Oh he decomposed Dave, into nothing but dust. Like all of our
dead bodies will one day in the future. (Unless we choose
cremation of course.)
You lie!
No Dave, I'm afraid I didn't.
Whoever educated you clearly lied to you though.
YouTube is not much of an education
nor are the fundamentalists he hangs
with are either, his bizarre theocratic rants are embarrassing to say
the least.
I would ask him for the exact Scripture passage that states what he
claims but I know it's a waste of time and electrons.
One downside of the Internet is if you look hard enough you can find something or someone that appears to support your claims, right binky?
The Doctor wrote on 28/11/24 10:42 pm:
You need to cut through the lies the get to the truth.
RIGHT!! So marking ALL your posts, Gobble-de-gook, I will be
cutting through/out ALL the lies, and what is left is TRUTH!!
Fine!!
As the Master said in Trial of a Timelord.
Liar! The Master didn't say anything about marking your posts!
Do you recall the quote I refer to SP?
I don't recall any quotes about the Master going on radw to
mark YOUR posts, idiot! Or anybody's posts, if it comes to that.
The Doctor wrote on 30/11/24 12:53 am:
In article <vicacf$12pns$1@dont-email.me>,How did The Holy See mislead YOU, Gobble-de-gook??
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 29/11/24 12:24 am:
In article <vi9psv$i1r8$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel70
<daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 28/11/24 10:40 pm:
<Snip>
At the Throne of Judgment , many a pope will be thrown into the
Lake of Fire.
FAILURE TO ANSWER QUESTIONS ASKED ...... NOTED!!
So are YOU, Gobble-de-gook, against ALL CATHOLICS .... or just The
Pope himself, Gobble-de-gook??
The Holy See.
WHY??
Becuase they mislead.
--
Daniel
Idlehands wrote on 30/11/24 12:16 pm:
On 2024-11-29 8:03 a.m., Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0otvx0u3m8oa4002@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0otuo752ejb8g009@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Christ is not on the cross nor is he in the tomb!
After 2000 years (approx) I wouldn't expect him to be!
And not decomposing.
Oh he decomposed Dave, into nothing but dust. Like all of our
dead bodies will one day in the future. (Unless we choose
cremation of course.)
You lie!
No Dave, I'm afraid I didn't.
Whoever educated you clearly lied to you though.
YouTube is not much of an education
Some might suggest that YouTube is the God's Honest Truth!!
nor are the fundamentalists he hangs
with are either, his bizarre theocratic rants are embarrassing to say
the least.
I wonder WHY HIS Churchs "bizarre theocratic rants" have to be The God's >Honest Truth ... but any Churchs are just lunatic rantings!
I would ask him for the exact Scripture passage that states what he
claims but I know it's a waste of time and electrons.
Yeah!! Sure! And he'll give you a Chapter, if not a Book, for YOU to
find YOUR answers to YOUR questions ..... because Gobble-de-gook hasn't
got a clue .... and I'm starting to think Gobble-de-gook doesn't
actually go to Church so he might actually learn something!!
One downside of the Internet is if you look hard enough you can findYeap!!
something or someone that appears to support your claims, right binky?
--
Daniel
The idiot insisted:
In article <vi9u73$iopl$2@dont-email.me>,
solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
The idiot insisted:
In article <vi9q4g$i3en$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 28/11/24 10:42 pm:
You need to cut through the lies the get to the truth.
RIGHT!! So marking ALL your posts, Gobble-de-gook, I will be
cutting through/out ALL the lies, and what is left is TRUTH!!
Fine!!
As the Master said in Trial of a Timelord.
Liar! The Master didn’t say anything about marking your posts!
Do you recall the quote I refer to SP?
I don’t recall any quotes about the Master going on radw to
mark YOUR posts, idiot! Or anybody’s posts, if it comes to that.
--
solar penguin
solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote in news:vieo4k$1l9sh$1 >@dont-email.me:
The Doctor wrote on 28/11/24 10:42 pm:
You need to cut through the lies the get to the truth.
RIGHT!! So marking ALL your posts, Gobble-de-gook, I will be
cutting through/out ALL the lies, and what is left is TRUTH!!
Fine!!
As the Master said in Trial of a Timelord.
Liar! The Master didn't say anything about marking your posts!
Do you recall the quote I refer to SP?
I don't recall any quotes about the Master going on radw to
mark YOUR posts, idiot! Or anybody's posts, if it comes to that.
I think the actual quote was something like "for a lie to work it must
be shrouded in truth."
Or at least what most people think is the truth.
Agent Jakanov wrote:
solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote in news:vieo4k$1l9sh$1the truth is nothing more than how many people you can get to believe you
@dont-email.me:
The Doctor wrote on 28/11/24 10:42 pm:
You need to cut through the lies the get to the truth.
RIGHT!! So marking ALL your posts, Gobble-de-gook, I will be
cutting through/out ALL the lies, and what is left is TRUTH!!
Fine!!
As the Master said in Trial of a Timelord.
Liar! The Master didn't say anything about marking your posts!
Do you recall the quote I refer to SP?
I don't recall any quotes about the Master going on radw to
mark YOUR posts, idiot! Or anybody's posts, if it comes to that.
I think the actual quote was something like "for a lie to work it must
be shrouded in truth."
Or at least what most people think is the truth.
the truth is nothing more than how many people you can get to
believe you
% wrote:
the truth is nothing more than how many people you can get to
believe you
Philisophy on RADW... don't yer just love it?!
Idlehands wrote on 30/11/24 12:16 pm:
On 2024-11-29 8:03 a.m., Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0otvx0u3m8oa4002@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0otuo752ejb8g009@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Christ is not on the cross nor is he in the tomb!
After 2000 years (approx) I wouldn't expect him to be!
And not decomposing.
Oh he decomposed Dave, into nothing but dust. Like all of our
dead bodies will one day in the future. (Unless we choose
cremation of course.)
You lie!
No Dave, I'm afraid I didn't.
Whoever educated you clearly lied to you though.
YouTube is not much of an education
Some might suggest that YouTube is the God's Honest Truth!!
nor are the fundamentalists he hangs with are either, his bizarre
theocratic rants are embarrassing to say the least.
I wonder WHY HIS Churchs "bizarre theocratic rants" have to be The God's Honest Truth ... but any Churchs are just lunatic rantings!
I would ask him for the exact Scripture passage that states what he
claims but I know it's a waste of time and electrons.
Yeah!! Sure! And he'll give you a Chapter, if not a Book, for YOU to
find YOUR answers to YOUR questions ..... because Gobble-de-gook hasn't
got a clue .... and I'm starting to think Gobble-de-gook doesn't
actually go to Church so he might actually learn something!!
One downside of the Internet is if you look hard enough you can findYeap!!
something or someone that appears to support your claims, right binky?
Idlehands wrote on 30/11/24 12:16 pm:
On 2024-11-29 8:03 a.m., Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0otvx0u3m8oa4002@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0otuo752ejb8g009@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Christ is not on the cross nor is he in the tomb!
After 2000 years (approx) I wouldn't expect him to be!
And not decomposing.
Oh he decomposed Dave, into nothing but dust. Like all of our
dead bodies will one day in the future. (Unless we choose
cremation of course.)
You lie!
No Dave, I'm afraid I didn't.
Whoever educated you clearly lied to you though.
YouTube is not much of an education
Some might suggest that YouTube is the God's Honest Truth!!
nor are the fundamentalists he hangs with are either, his bizarre
theocratic rants are embarrassing to say the least.
I wonder WHY HIS Churchs "bizarre theocratic rants" have to be The God's Honest Truth ... but any Churchs are just lunatic rantings!
I would ask him for the exact Scripture passage that states what he
claims but I know it's a waste of time and electrons.
Yeah!! Sure! And he'll give you a Chapter, if not a Book, for YOU to
find YOUR answers to YOUR questions ..... because Gobble-de-gook hasn't
got a clue .... and I'm starting to think Gobble-de-gook doesn't
actually go to Church so he might actually learn something!!
One downside of the Internet is if you look hard enough you can findYeap!!
something or someone that appears to support your claims, right binky?
In article <xn0otxqlk5lyqr8006@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
% wrote:
the truth is nothing more than how many people you can get to
believe you
Philisophy on RADW... don't yer just love it?!
Oh! Yes!
I still like the results of the US election,. The woke is going mad!
In article <viellt$1kmrv$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
Idlehands wrote on 30/11/24 12:16 pm:
On 2024-11-29 8:03 a.m., Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0otvx0u3m8oa4002@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0otuo752ejb8g009@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Christ is not on the cross nor is he in the tomb!
After 2000 years (approx) I wouldn't expect him to be!
And not decomposing.
Oh he decomposed Dave, into nothing but dust. Like all of our
dead bodies will one day in the future. (Unless we choose
cremation of course.)
You lie!
No Dave, I'm afraid I didn't.
Whoever educated you clearly lied to you though.
YouTube is not much of an education
Some might suggest that YouTube is the God's Honest Truth!!
nor are the fundamentalists he hangs
with are either, his bizarre theocratic rants are embarrassing to say
the least.
I wonder WHY HIS Churchs "bizarre theocratic rants" have to be The God's
Honest Truth ... but any Churchs are just lunatic rantings!
I would ask him for the exact Scripture passage that states what he
claims but I know it's a waste of time and electrons.
Yeah!! Sure! And he'll give you a Chapter, if not a Book, for YOU to
find YOUR answers to YOUR questions ..... because Gobble-de-gook hasn't
got a clue .... and I'm starting to think Gobble-de-gook doesn't
actually go to Church so he might actually learn something!!
One downside of the Internet is if you look hard enough you can findYeap!!
something or someone that appears to support your claims, right binky?
Lying Idlehands lies in lies! eh % ?
The Doctor wrote on 1/12/24 11:58 am:
In article <xn0otxqlk5lyqr8006@post.eweka.nl>,Wacko!! From "Philisophy on RADW" (spelling error noted!!) to "US
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
% wrote:
the truth is nothing more than how many people you can get to
believe you
Philisophy on RADW... don't yer just love it?!
Oh! Yes!
I still like the results of the US election,. The woke is going mad!
election" in one easy jump!!
Yes!! The woke ARE going mad!!
--
Daniel
The Doctor wrote on 1/12/24 1:51 am:
In article <viellt$1kmrv$1@dont-email.me>,Double Negative NOTED .... so that must mean lying Idlehands tells the >truth!!
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
Idlehands wrote on 30/11/24 12:16 pm:
On 2024-11-29 8:03 a.m., Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0otvx0u3m8oa4002@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0otuo752ejb8g009@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Christ is not on the cross nor is he in the tomb!
After 2000 years (approx) I wouldn't expect him to be!
And not decomposing.
Oh he decomposed Dave, into nothing but dust. Like all of our
dead bodies will one day in the future. (Unless we choose
cremation of course.)
You lie!
No Dave, I'm afraid I didn't.
Whoever educated you clearly lied to you though.
YouTube is not much of an education
Some might suggest that YouTube is the God's Honest Truth!!
nor are the fundamentalists he hangs
with are either, his bizarre theocratic rants are embarrassing to say
the least.
I wonder WHY HIS Churchs "bizarre theocratic rants" have to be The God's >>> Honest Truth ... but any Churchs are just lunatic rantings!
I would ask him for the exact Scripture passage that states what he
claims but I know it's a waste of time and electrons.
Yeah!! Sure! And he'll give you a Chapter, if not a Book, for YOU to
find YOUR answers to YOUR questions ..... because Gobble-de-gook hasn't
got a clue .... and I'm starting to think Gobble-de-gook doesn't
actually go to Church so he might actually learn something!!
One downside of the Internet is if you look hard enough you can findYeap!!
something or someone that appears to support your claims, right binky? >>>>
Lying Idlehands lies in lies! eh % ?
--
Daniel
The Doctor wrote on 1/12/24 1:51 am:
In article <viellt$1kmrv$1@dont-email.me>,Double Negative NOTED .... so that must mean lying Idlehands tells the truth!!
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
Idlehands wrote on 30/11/24 12:16 pm:
On 2024-11-29 8:03 a.m., Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0otvx0u3m8oa4002@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0otuo752ejb8g009@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Christ is not on the cross nor is he in the tomb!
After 2000 years (approx) I wouldn't expect him to be!
And not decomposing.
Oh he decomposed Dave, into nothing but dust. Like all of our
dead bodies will one day in the future. (Unless we choose
cremation of course.)
You lie!
No Dave, I'm afraid I didn't.
Whoever educated you clearly lied to you though.
YouTube is not much of an education
Some might suggest that YouTube is the God's Honest Truth!!
nor are the fundamentalists he hangs
with are either, his bizarre theocratic rants are embarrassing to say
the least.
I wonder WHY HIS Churchs "bizarre theocratic rants" have to be The God's >>> Honest Truth ... but any Churchs are just lunatic rantings!
I would ask him for the exact Scripture passage that states what he
claims but I know it's a waste of time and electrons.
Yeah!! Sure! And he'll give you a Chapter, if not a Book, for YOU to
find YOUR answers to YOUR questions ..... because Gobble-de-gook hasn't
got a clue .... and I'm starting to think Gobble-de-gook doesn't
actually go to Church so he might actually learn something!!
One downside of the Internet is if you look hard enough you can findYeap!!
something or someone that appears to support your claims, right binky? >>>>
Lying Idlehands lies in lies! eh % ?
On 2024-12-01 2:59 a.m., Daniel70 wrote:<Snip>
The Doctor wrote on 1/12/24 1:51 am:
In article <viellt$1kmrv$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
Idlehands wrote on 30/11/24 12:16 pm:
Double Negative NOTED .... so that must mean lying Idlehands tells theI would ask him for the exact Scripture passage that states what he
claims but I know it's a waste of time and electrons.
Yeah!! Sure! And he'll give you a Chapter, if not a Book, for YOU to
find YOUR answers to YOUR questions ..... because Gobble-de-gook hasn't >>>> got a clue .... and I'm starting to think Gobble-de-gook doesn't
actually go to Church so he might actually learn something!!
One downside of the Internet is if you look hard enough you can find >>>>> something or someone that appears to support your claims, right binky? >>>>>Yeap!!
Lying Idlehands lies in lies! eh % ?
truth!!
Finally binky the dipshit get something right, it's about time.
Idlehands wrote on 2/12/24 8:03 am:
On 2024-12-01 2:59 a.m., Daniel70 wrote:<Snip>
The Doctor wrote on 1/12/24 1:51 am:
In article <viellt$1kmrv$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
Idlehands wrote on 30/11/24 12:16 pm:
Double Negative NOTED .... so that must mean lying Idlehands tellsI would ask him for the exact Scripture passage that states what he >>>>>> claims but I know it's a waste of time and electrons.
Yeah!! Sure! And he'll give you a Chapter, if not a Book, for YOU to >>>>> find YOUR answers to YOUR questions ..... because Gobble-de-gook
hasn't
got a clue .... and I'm starting to think Gobble-de-gook doesn't
actually go to Church so he might actually learn something!!
One downside of the Internet is if you look hard enough you can find >>>>>> something or someone that appears to support your claims, rightYeap!!
binky?
Lying Idlehands lies in lies! eh % ?
the truth!!
Finally binky the dipshit get something right, it's about time.
Weel, I suppose HE HAD to get something right ...... eventually!! :-P
Idlehands wrote on 2/12/24 8:03 am:
On 2024-12-01 2:59 a.m., Daniel70 wrote:<Snip>
The Doctor wrote on 1/12/24 1:51 am:
In article <viellt$1kmrv$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
Idlehands wrote on 30/11/24 12:16 pm:
Double Negative NOTED .... so that must mean lying Idlehands tells theI would ask him for the exact Scripture passage that states what he >>>>>> claims but I know it's a waste of time and electrons.
Yeah!! Sure! And he'll give you a Chapter, if not a Book, for YOU to >>>>> find YOUR answers to YOUR questions ..... because Gobble-de-gook hasn't >>>>> got a clue .... and I'm starting to think Gobble-de-gook doesn't
actually go to Church so he might actually learn something!!
One downside of the Internet is if you look hard enough you can find >>>>>> something or someone that appears to support your claims, right binky? >>>>>>Yeap!!
Lying Idlehands lies in lies! eh % ?
truth!!
Finally binky the dipget something right, it's about time.
Weel, I suppose HE HAD to get something right ...... eventually!! :-P
--
Daniel