• Google Gemini reviews Doctor Who - MArk of the Rani

    From The Doctor@21:1/5 to All on Fri Aug 30 13:58:32 2024
    XPost: uk.media.tv.sf.drwho, rec.arts.sf.tv, rec.arts.tv
    XPost: can.arts.sf

    ## Doctor Who: The Mark of the Rani - A Flawed Debut

    Based on the information from Chakoteya.net,
    Doctor Who: The Mark of the Rani presents a mixed bag. Here's a breakdown:

    **Strengths:**

    * **The Rani's Introduction:** This story marks the debut of the Rani,
    a Time Lady villain with a unique scientific approach to evil.

    * **Historical Setting:** The Victorian-era setting offers a visually interesting backdrop for the story.

    * **Doctor and Master:** The dynamic between the Doctor and the Master,
    another Time Lord villain, can be entertaining for fans.

    **Weaknesses:**

    * **Weak Plot:** The overall plot seems derivative, focusing
    on the Rani's experiments and attempts to steal the Doctor's mind.

    * **Uneven Pacing:** Reviews suggest the story can feel slow at times, particularly in the middle episodes.

    * **Underdeveloped Master:** The Master's role seems insignificant
    and doesn't contribute much to the story.

    * **Rani's Portrayal:** While the Rani's concept is interesting,
    her execution might be underwhelming, lacking the necessary menace
    or complexity.

    **Overall:**

    The Mark of the Rani appears to be a somewhat disappointing story.
    The introduction of the Rani, a potentially interesting villain,
    is overshadowed by a weak plot, uneven pacing, and underdeveloped characters.

    **Rating:** Based on the information provided, The Mark of the Rani gets
    a rating of **4.5 out of 10**. There are some glimpses of potential,
    but the overall execution falls short.

    **Additional Notes:**

    * Some viewers might find the historical setting and the Doctor-Master
    dynamic to be redeeming qualities, even if the main plot is lacking.

    * If you're interested in the Rani as a villain, it might be better
    to explore her appearances in later stories where her character
    might be developed further.
    --
    Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
    Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ;

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Doctor@21:1/5 to solar.penguin@gmail.com on Fri Aug 30 14:45:35 2024
    XPost: uk.media.tv.sf.drwho, rec.arts.sf.tv, rec.arts.tv
    XPost: can.arts.sf

    In article <vaslkh$hhk6$1@dont-email.me>,
    solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:

    The idiot insisted:


    * **Historical Setting:** The Victorian-era setting offers a
    visually interesting backdrop for the story.

    The reign of King George IV was in the Victorian era!?!

    Error 1



    * **Uneven Pacing:** Reviews suggest the story can feel slow
    at times, particularly in the middle episodes.


    The middle episodes of a two-episode story!?!


    More importantly, the LLM bot has missed the biggest
    problem with the story. The mention of Humphrey Davy
    visiting the colliery for the conference. This would __never_
    happen because of the long-standing feud between him
    and Stephenson over who invented the first miner’s safety
    lamp. (It was actually Stephenson but Davy could afford
    better lawyers!) #JusticeForGeorge


    Success! You shot Google down!


    --
    solar penguin


    --
    Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
    Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ;

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)