• ChatGPT reviews Doctor Who Victory of the Daleks

    From The Doctor@21:1/5 to All on Wed Oct 23 14:52:47 2024
    XPost: uk.media.tv.sf.drwho, rec.arts.sf.tv, rec.arts.tv
    XPost: can.arts.sf

    In *"Victory of the Daleks"*, the Doctor faces his old enemies in WWII-era London. The Daleks are disguised as British war machines, manipulating Winston Churchill's forces. The story introduces a new, colorful Dalek paradigm, but the plot is thin and rushed. The pacing feels uneven, with a swift transition from war intrigue to sci-fi action.

    While the historical setting and Daleks' reintroduction are entertaining, the execution falls short. Overall, it's an enjoyable but flawed episode.
    I'd give it a 6/10, mostly for nostalgic value and visuals.
    --
    Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
    Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ;

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Doctor@21:1/5 to Blueshirt on Wed Oct 23 15:19:55 2024
    In article <xn0oses6s87gwd002@post.eweka.nl>,
    Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
    The Doctor wrote:

    In "Victory of the Daleks", the Doctor faces his old enemies
    in WWII-era London. The Daleks are disguised as British war
    machines, manipulating Winston Churchill's forces. The story
    introduces a new, colorful Dalek paradigm, but the plot is
    thin and rushed. The pacing feels uneven, with a swift
    transition from war intrigue to sci-fi action.

    While the historical setting and Daleks' reintroduction are
    entertaining, the execution falls short. Overall, it's an
    enjoyable but flawed episode. I'd give it a 6/10, mostly for
    nostalgic value and visuals.

    What sort of a review is that? There's no mention of Spitfires
    in space, but the humpback Daleks get a mention. <shrugs>

    And we won't even mention the trains in the sky!

    Ooops, too late. Sorry Daniel...

    :-)

    Rant on! Hence why AI is what DAnnyboy says it is!
    --
    Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
    Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ;

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Blueshirt@21:1/5 to The Doctor on Wed Oct 23 16:17:40 2024
    The Doctor wrote:

    In "Victory of the Daleks", the Doctor faces his old enemies
    in WWII-era London. The Daleks are disguised as British war
    machines, manipulating Winston Churchill's forces. The story
    introduces a new, colorful Dalek paradigm, but the plot is
    thin and rushed. The pacing feels uneven, with a swift
    transition from war intrigue to sci-fi action.

    While the historical setting and Daleks' reintroduction are
    entertaining, the execution falls short. Overall, it's an
    enjoyable but flawed episode. I'd give it a 6/10, mostly for
    nostalgic value and visuals.

    What sort of a review is that? There's no mention of Spitfires
    in space, but the humpback Daleks get a mention. <shrugs>

    And we won't even mention the trains in the sky!

    Ooops, too late. Sorry Daniel...

    :-)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Daniel70@21:1/5 to Blueshirt on Thu Oct 24 20:40:38 2024
    Blueshirt wrote on 24/10/24 2:17 am:
    The Doctor wrote:

    In "Victory of the Daleks", the Doctor faces his old enemies
    in WWII-era London. The Daleks are disguised as British war
    machines, manipulating Winston Churchill's forces. The story
    introduces a new, colorful Dalek paradigm, but the plot is
    thin and rushed. The pacing feels uneven, with a swift
    transition from war intrigue to sci-fi action.

    While the historical setting and Daleks' reintroduction are
    entertaining, the execution falls short. Overall, it's an
    enjoyable but flawed episode. I'd give it a 6/10, mostly for
    nostalgic value and visuals.

    What sort of a review is that? There's no mention of Spitfires
    in space, but the humpback Daleks get a mention. <shrugs>

    And we won't even mention the trains in the sky!

    Ooops, too late. Sorry Daniel...

    :-)

    What?? WHAT?? Oh, O.K.!! ;-P
    --
    Daniel

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Daniel70@21:1/5 to The Doctor on Thu Oct 24 20:41:49 2024
    The Doctor wrote on 24/10/24 2:19 am:
    In article <xn0oses6s87gwd002@post.eweka.nl>,
    Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
    The Doctor wrote:

    In "Victory of the Daleks", the Doctor faces his old enemies
    in WWII-era London. The Daleks are disguised as British war
    machines, manipulating Winston Churchill's forces. The story
    introduces a new, colorful Dalek paradigm, but the plot is
    thin and rushed. The pacing feels uneven, with a swift
    transition from war intrigue to sci-fi action.

    While the historical setting and Daleks' reintroduction are
    entertaining, the execution falls short. Overall, it's an
    enjoyable but flawed episode. I'd give it a 6/10, mostly for
    nostalgic value and visuals.

    What sort of a review is that? There's no mention of Spitfires
    in space, but the humpback Daleks get a mention. <shrugs>

    And we won't even mention the trains in the sky!

    Ooops, too late. Sorry Daniel...

    :-)

    Rant on! Hence why AI is what DAnnyboy says it is!

    Oh!! And what do I say 'AI' is, Gobble-de-gook??
    --
    Daniel

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Blueshirt@21:1/5 to All on Thu Oct 24 11:48:26 2024
    Daniel70 wrote:

    The Doctor wrote on 24/10/24 2:19 am:

    Hence why AI is what DAnnyboy says it is!

    Oh!! And what do I say 'AI' is, Gobble-de-gook??

    Oooh, is this a quiz that we can all play?

    Okay, I'll give it a go...


    Ass-wipe Intelligence?

    Absurd Intelligence?

    Ass-wipe Idiot-speak?

    Ass-wipe Imbicility?

    Artificial Idiocy?

    Artificial Insanity?

    Ass-wipe's Insanity?

    Etcetera...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Doctor@21:1/5 to daniel47@nomail.afraid.org on Thu Oct 24 10:58:18 2024
    In article <vfd4ot$2j5bn$3@dont-email.me>,
    Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
    The Doctor wrote on 24/10/24 2:19 am:
    In article <xn0oses6s87gwd002@post.eweka.nl>,
    Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
    The Doctor wrote:

    In "Victory of the Daleks", the Doctor faces his old enemies
    in WWII-era London. The Daleks are disguised as British war
    machines, manipulating Winston Churchill's forces. The story
    introduces a new, colorful Dalek paradigm, but the plot is
    thin and rushed. The pacing feels uneven, with a swift
    transition from war intrigue to sci-fi action.

    While the historical setting and Daleks' reintroduction are
    entertaining, the execution falls short. Overall, it's an
    enjoyable but flawed episode. I'd give it a 6/10, mostly for
    nostalgic value and visuals.

    What sort of a review is that? There's no mention of Spitfires
    in space, but the humpback Daleks get a mention. <shrugs>

    And we won't even mention the trains in the sky!

    Ooops, too late. Sorry Daniel...

    :-)

    Rant on! Hence why AI is what DAnnyboy says it is!

    Oh!! And what do I say 'AI' is, Gobble-de-gook??
    --
    Daniel

    You know!
    --
    Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
    Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ;

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Doctor@21:1/5 to Blueshirt on Thu Oct 24 10:58:34 2024
    In article <xn0osfzm51e12y9000@post.eweka.nl>,
    Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
    Daniel70 wrote:

    The Doctor wrote on 24/10/24 2:19 am:

    Hence why AI is what DAnnyboy says it is!

    Oh!! And what do I say 'AI' is, Gobble-de-gook??

    Oooh, is this a quiz that we can all play?

    Okay, I'll give it a go...


    Ass-wipe Intelligence?

    Absurd Intelligence?

    Ass-wipe Idiot-speak?

    Ass-wipe Imbicility?

    Artificial Idiocy?

    Artificial Insanity?

    Ass-wipe's Insanity?

    Etcetera...

    Along those lines!
    --
    Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
    Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ;

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Daniel70@21:1/5 to The Doctor on Thu Oct 24 23:53:38 2024
    The Doctor wrote on 24/10/24 9:58 pm:
    In article <vfd4ot$2j5bn$3@dont-email.me>,
    Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
    The Doctor wrote on 24/10/24 2:19 am:
    In article <xn0oses6s87gwd002@post.eweka.nl>,
    Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
    The Doctor wrote:

    In "Victory of the Daleks", the Doctor faces his old enemies
    in WWII-era London. The Daleks are disguised as British war
    machines, manipulating Winston Churchill's forces. The story
    introduces a new, colorful Dalek paradigm, but the plot is
    thin and rushed. The pacing feels uneven, with a swift
    transition from war intrigue to sci-fi action.

    While the historical setting and Daleks' reintroduction are
    entertaining, the execution falls short. Overall, it's an
    enjoyable but flawed episode. I'd give it a 6/10, mostly for
    nostalgic value and visuals.

    What sort of a review is that? There's no mention of Spitfires
    in space, but the humpback Daleks get a mention. <shrugs>

    And we won't even mention the trains in the sky!

    Ooops, too late. Sorry Daniel...

    :-)

    Rant on! Hence why AI is what DAnnyboy says it is!

    Oh!! And what do I say 'AI' is, Gobble-de-gook??

    You know!

    If *I* knew what *I* had said (in this instance), why would *I* have to
    ask YOU, Gobble-de-gook??
    --
    Daniel

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Daniel70@21:1/5 to Blueshirt on Thu Oct 24 23:50:56 2024
    Blueshirt wrote on 24/10/24 9:48 pm:
    Daniel70 wrote:

    The Doctor wrote on 24/10/24 2:19 am:

    Hence why AI is what DAnnyboy says it is!

    Oh!! And what do I say 'AI' is, Gobble-de-gook??

    Oooh, is this a quiz that we can all play?

    No, although your attempts ALL seem appropriate, I was merely trying to determine what my Voice (in Gobble-de-gook's head) had said.

    Okay, I'll give it a go...


    Ass-wipe Intelligence?

    Absurd Intelligence?

    Ass-wipe Idiot-speak?

    Ass-wipe Imbicility?

    Artificial Idiocy?

    Artificial Insanity?

    Ass-wipe's Insanity?

    Etcetera...

    --
    Daniel

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Idlehands@21:1/5 to Blueshirt on Thu Oct 24 06:47:19 2024
    On 2024-10-24 4:48 a.m., Blueshirt wrote:
    Daniel70 wrote:

    The Doctor wrote on 24/10/24 2:19 am:

    Hence why AI is what DAnnyboy says it is!

    Oh!! And what do I say 'AI' is, Gobble-de-gook??

    Oooh, is this a quiz that we can all play?

    Okay, I'll give it a go...


    Ass-wipe Intelligence?

    Absurd Intelligence?

    Ass-wipe Idiot-speak?

    Ass-wipe Imbicility?

    Artificial Idiocy?

    Artificial Insanity?

    Ass-wipe's Insanity?

    Etcetera...

    I bet binky's mummy wishes it would assist with his ass wiping.

    --
    "Do you make a habit of shitting in newsgroups? This is not
    rational behavior."

    pt
    (Binky failed to answer this question)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Doctor@21:1/5 to daniel47@nomail.afraid.org on Fri Oct 25 00:41:52 2024
    In article <vfdfrj$2krg5$1@dont-email.me>,
    Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
    Blueshirt wrote on 24/10/24 9:48 pm:
    Daniel70 wrote:

    The Doctor wrote on 24/10/24 2:19 am:

    Hence why AI is what DAnnyboy says it is!

    Oh!! And what do I say 'AI' is, Gobble-de-gook??

    Oooh, is this a quiz that we can all play?

    No, although your attempts ALL seem appropriate, I was merely trying to >determine what my Voice (in Gobble-de-gook's head) had said.

    Okay, I'll give it a go...


    Ass-wipe Intelligence?

    Absurd Intelligence?

    Ass-wipe Idiot-speak?

    Ass-wipe Imbicility?

    Artificial Idiocy?

    Artificial Insanity?

    Ass-wipe's Insanity?

    Etcetera...

    --
    Daniel

    WEll BS got it correct.
    --
    Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
    Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ;

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Doctor@21:1/5 to daniel47@nomail.afraid.org on Fri Oct 25 00:42:28 2024
    In article <vfdg0i$2krg5$2@dont-email.me>,
    Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
    The Doctor wrote on 24/10/24 9:58 pm:
    In article <vfd4ot$2j5bn$3@dont-email.me>,
    Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
    The Doctor wrote on 24/10/24 2:19 am:
    In article <xn0oses6s87gwd002@post.eweka.nl>,
    Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
    The Doctor wrote:

    In "Victory of the Daleks", the Doctor faces his old enemies
    in WWII-era London. The Daleks are disguised as British war
    machines, manipulating Winston Churchill's forces. The story
    introduces a new, colorful Dalek paradigm, but the plot is
    thin and rushed. The pacing feels uneven, with a swift
    transition from war intrigue to sci-fi action.

    While the historical setting and Daleks' reintroduction are
    entertaining, the execution falls short. Overall, it's an
    enjoyable but flawed episode. I'd give it a 6/10, mostly for
    nostalgic value and visuals.

    What sort of a review is that? There's no mention of Spitfires
    in space, but the humpback Daleks get a mention. <shrugs>

    And we won't even mention the trains in the sky!

    Ooops, too late. Sorry Daniel...

    :-)

    Rant on! Hence why AI is what DAnnyboy says it is!

    Oh!! And what do I say 'AI' is, Gobble-de-gook??

    You know!

    If *I* knew what *I* had said (in this instance), why would *I* have to
    ask YOU, Gobble-de-gook??
    --
    Daniel

    Because , Dannyboy, BS got is correct.
    --
    Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
    Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ;

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)