| Sysop: | Amessyroom |
|---|---|
| Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
| Users: | 28 |
| Nodes: | 6 (1 / 5) |
| Uptime: | 60:40:43 |
| Calls: | 424 |
| Calls today: | 2 |
| Files: | 1,025 |
| Messages: | 91,025 |
| Posted today: | 1 |
SEASON 2 - EPISODE 5 - THE STORY AND THE ENGINE
Not as bad as SPACE BABIES. Not as good as THE WELL.
Confusing and invigorating in equal measure THE STORY AND THE ENGINE
takes us to a barber shop that is in two places at once. It is on Earth
in Nigeria, as well as in space on the back of a giant spider. The Dr
and Belinda Chandra have landed in Lagos, where a shadowy Barber has
ensnared innocent souls and is stealing their tales for sinister ends.
The episode then becomes a tale of gods and monsters using stories as
fuel for the engine that drives the spider-ship.
The Fugitive Dr is back too! For a brief moment. In a scene that felt a
bit awkward to me, both in how it was presented and what it means for Dr
Who lore. Does the doctor now remember the pre-Hartnell era? Did he
sneak a look at the fob watch from FLUX when we wasn't watching? Or was
it the barber shop spilling the doctor's past from his story that
triggered the doctor's memories? At the beginning of the episode the
doctor says to Belinda “My body changes a lot. It’s the first time I’ve >had this Black body.” In which case, how come the Fugitive Dr also has
a black body? I'm not quite sure what this scene means. Does the doctor >remember his past or not? Maybe it isn't that significant. Or perhaps it
is. Regardless, it felt a little clunky to me.
Mrs Flood is also back. Blink and you will miss her. I'm not sure if
these brief cameos are clever or just annoying. I am leaning towards the >latter at this moment in time. We'll have to see how they all pull
together at the end of the season. On top of that, we also have a
shadowy child following Belinda Chandra, from the cast list at the end
it seems this child's name is Poppy. Interesting!
Dr Who showcases a visual evolution since the Disney investment but >ultimately seems to prioritise style over substance in the grand scheme
of things. With only three episodes left of the season it's going to be
fun watching Russell Davies pull all of his threads together into a
coherent finale. Just as well the finale is two episodes, he might need
it. I’m not sold on Dr Who becoming a fairy tale driven series either.
Or the mythology and god references. I do like some science in my
science fiction.
Six out of ten, mainly because the episode looked really good and the
doctor was the main focus this week.
--
https://www.theory11.com/
SEASON 2 - EPISODE 5 - THE STORY AND THE ENGINE
Not as bad as SPACE BABIES. Not as good as THE WELL.
Confusing and invigorating in equal measure THE STORY AND THE ENGINE
takes us to a barber shop that is in two places at once. It is on Earth
in Nigeria, as well as in space on the back of a giant spider. The Dr
and Belinda Chandra have landed in Lagos, where a shadowy Barber has
ensnared innocent souls and is stealing their tales for sinister ends.
The episode then becomes a tale of gods and monsters using stories as
fuel for the engine that drives the spider-ship.
The Fugitive Dr is back too! For a brief moment. In a scene that felt a
bit awkward to me, both in how it was presented and what it means for Dr
Who lore. Does the doctor now remember the pre-Hartnell era? Did he
sneak a look at the fob watch from FLUX when we wasn't watching? Or was
it the barber shop spilling the doctor's past from his story that
triggered the doctor's memories? At the beginning of the episode the
doctor says to Belinda “My body changes a lot. It’s the first time I’ve had this Black body.” In which case, how come the Fugitive Dr also has
a black body? I'm not quite sure what this scene means. Does the doctor remember his past or not? Maybe it isn't that significant. Or perhaps it
is. Regardless, it felt a little clunky to me.
Mrs Flood is also back. Blink and you will miss her. I'm not sure if
these brief cameos are clever or just annoying. I am leaning towards the latter at this moment in time. We'll have to see how they all pull
together at the end of the season. On top of that, we also have a
shadowy child following Belinda Chandra, from the cast list at the end
it seems this child's name is Poppy. Interesting!
Dr Who showcases a visual evolution since the Disney investment but ultimately seems to prioritise style over substance in the grand scheme
of things. With only three episodes left of the season it's going to be
fun watching Russell Davies pull all of his threads together into a
coherent finale. Just as well the finale is two episodes, he might need
it. I’m not sold on Dr Who becoming a fairy tale driven series either.
Or the mythology and god references. I do like some science in my
science fiction.
Six out of ten, mainly because the episode looked really good and the
doctor was the main focus this week.
On 10/05/2025 15:30, Theory11 wrote:
SEASON 2 - EPISODE 5 - THE STORY AND THE ENGINE
Not as bad as SPACE BABIES. Not as good as THE WELL.
Confusing and invigorating in equal measure THE STORY AND THE ENGINE
takes us to a barber shop that is in two places at once. It is on Earth
in Nigeria, as well as in space on the back of a giant spider. The Dr
and Belinda Chandra have landed in Lagos, where a shadowy Barber has
ensnared innocent souls and is stealing their tales for sinister ends.
The episode then becomes a tale of gods and monsters using stories as
fuel for the engine that drives the spider-ship.
Why would stories fuel the engine of a ship? Stories are not steam,
gasoline, diesel, or electricity. This story isn't Doctor Who, it's
Samphire and Steel.
The Fugitive Dr is back too! For a brief moment. In a scene that felt aIt's most likely that the DEI hire that wrote this episode wanted to use
bit awkward to me, both in how it was presented and what it means for Dr
Who lore. Does the doctor now remember the pre-Hartnell era? Did he
sneak a look at the fob watch from FLUX when we wasn't watching? Or was
it the barber shop spilling the doctor's past from his story that
triggered the doctor's memories? At the beginning of the episode the
doctor says to Belinda “My body changes a lot. It’s the first time I’ve
had this Black body.” In which case, how come the Fugitive Dr also has >> a black body? I'm not quite sure what this scene means. Does the doctor
remember his past or not? Maybe it isn't that significant. Or perhaps it
is. Regardless, it felt a little clunky to me.
it to spread his racist agenda, failing to mention that Gatwa's own
ancestors mutilated and murdered each other in Rwanda despite all of
them being black, and the pervert Russell T Davies decided to insert his
own bigoted agenda on top of it by showing Jo Martin being the subject
of a lesbian wedding. The original script probably had that scene
written for Gatwa, given that when the faces of the other Doctors show
up including Whittaker you don't see any before Hartnell.
Mrs Flood is also back. Blink and you will miss her. I'm not sure if
these brief cameos are clever or just annoying. I am leaning towards the
latter at this moment in time. We'll have to see how they all pull
together at the end of the season. On top of that, we also have a
How can Mrs Flood be in a story that Gatwa told based on a story Belinda
told him whose never seen Mrs Flood? Why would he insert her into his story?
shadowy child following Belinda Chandra, from the cast list at the end
it seems this child's name is Poppy. Interesting!
So the Timeless Child monster may now have a name.
Dr Who showcases a visual evolution since the Disney investment but
ultimately seems to prioritise style over substance in the grand scheme
of things. With only three episodes left of the season it's going to be
fun watching Russell Davies pull all of his threads together into a
coherent finale. Just as well the finale is two episodes, he might need
it. I’m not sold on Dr Who becoming a fairy tale driven series either.
Or the mythology and god references. I do like some science in my
science fiction.
Six out of ten, mainly because the episode looked really good and the
doctor was the main focus this week.
It was a pile of woke crap written to capture people's attention for
long enough and get them watch far-left hypocritical propaganda.
-60/10 from the moment Jo Martin appeared as a lesbian in order to
pervert the development of under age girls.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." -William Shatner
The True loon displayed less and less logic:
It's most likely that the DEI hire that wrote this episode wanted to use
it to spread his racist agenda, failing to mention that Gatwa's own
ancestors mutilated and murdered each other in Rwanda despite all of
them being black,
Why would they mention the _actor’s_ ancestors?
When Pertwee played the Doctor, was there any mention of
him being descended from French nobles? Did the Capaldi era
explain why a family with a Mediterranean surname were living
in Scotland? Did we get a detailed family tree showing how
Tom and Colin Baker weren’t related?
Of course not. The actor isn’t the character. Why do you find this so hard >to understand?
The actor isn’t the character. Why do you find this so hard
to understand?
--
solar penguin
The asswipe asked:^^^^^^^<-PAedophile tlker noted.
In article <c13a14c06dd07b2e214e6a44a6ec87c0@www.novabbs.com>,
Theory11 <card.master@bee92.invalid.com> wrote:
Six out of ten, mainly because the episode looked really good and the
doctor was the main focus this week.
Out of 10?
What did you think it would be out of.
--
solar penguin
The asswipe attempted arithmetic:
In article <c13a14c06dd07b2e214e6a44a6ec87c0@www.novabbs.com>,
Theory11 <card.master@bee92.invalid.com> wrote:
Six out of ten, mainly because the episode looked really good
and the doctor was the main focus this week.
So 4 = 6 is 10 / 2
Maths isn’t your strong point, is it ?
--
solar penguin
The True loon displayed less and less logic:
It's most likely that the DEI hire that wrote this episode wanted to use
it to spread his racist agenda, failing to mention that Gatwa's own
ancestors mutilated and murdered each other in Rwanda despite all of
them being black,
Why would they mention the _actor’s_ ancestors?
When Pertwee played the Doctor, was there any mention of
him being descended from French nobles? Did the Capaldi era
explain why a family with a Mediterranean surname were living
in Scotland? Did we get a detailed family tree showing how
Tom and Colin Baker weren’t related?
Of course not. The actor isn’t the character. Why do you find this so hard to understand?
The actor isn’t the character. Why do you find this so hard
to understand?
The True Doctor wrote:
On 10/05/2025 20:16, solar imbecile wrote:
You forgot to change it to “imbecile.” Please try harder.
The True Doctor wrote:
It's most likely that the DEI hire that wrote this episode wanted to use >>>> it to spread his racist agenda, failing to mention that Gatwa's own
ancestors mutilated and murdered each other in Rwanda despite all of
them being black,
Why would they mention the _actor’s_ ancestors?
Because the entire episode was about Gatwa being black,
No.
The episode was an allegory about how AI is transforming the>creative arts. The business about the Doctor being black was
just there to add a bit of colour (no pun intended) with an
unusual setting.
so of course
they have to mention his ancestors and the genocide they carried out
against each other instead of the woke hypocrites blaming all white
people as being the racists.
You did notice that the villain in this story was black, didn’t you?
On 10/05/2025 20:16, solar penguin wrote:
The True loon displayed less and less logic:
It's most likely that the DEI hire that wrote this episode wanted to use >>> it to spread his racist agenda, failing to mention that Gatwa's own
ancestors mutilated and murdered each other in Rwanda despite all of
them being black,
Why would they mention the _actor’s_ ancestors?
Because the entire episode was about Gatwa being black, so of course
they have to mention his ancestors and the genocide they carried out
against each other instead of the woke hypocrites blaming all white
people as being the racists.
When Pertwee played the Doctor, was there any mention of
him being descended from French nobles? Did the Capaldi era
Because none of the stories were about him being French.
explain why a family with a Mediterranean surname were living
in Scotland? Did we get a detailed family tree showing how
None of the episodes were about him being Italian except The Fires of
Pompeii and at the time of the episode he was not playing the Doctor.
Tom and Colin Baker weren’t related?
None of the stories were about bakers. You had to wait until Peter
Davison for that at the end of The Visitation about the baker who
started the Great Fire of London, except it was really the Terileptils.
Of course not. The actor isn’t the character. Why do you find this so hard
to understand?
You are the one who does not understand.
The actor isn’t the character. Why do you find this so hardHow about you learn some history instead of acting like an ignorant moron.
to understand?
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." -William Shatner
The True loon looked right through an allegory:
On 10/05/2025 20:16, solar penguin wrote:
You forgot to change it to “imbecile.” Please try harder.
The True loon displayed less and less logic:
It's most likely that the DEI hire that wrote this episode wanted to use >>>> it to spread his racist agenda, failing to mention that Gatwa's own
ancestors mutilated and murdered each other in Rwanda despite all of
them being black,
Why would they mention the _actor’s_ ancestors?
Because the entire episode was about Gatwa being black,
No. The episode was an allegory about how AI is transforming the
creative arts. The business about the Doctor being black was
just there to add a bit of colour (no pun intended) with an
unusual setting.
so of course
they have to mention his ancestors and the genocide they carried out
against each other instead of the woke hypocrites blaming all white
people as being the racists.
You did notice that the villain in this story was black, didn’t you?
--
solar penguin
On 10/05/2025 21:56, solar imbecile wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 10/05/2025 20:16, solar imbecile wrote:
You forgot to change it to “imbecile.” Please try harder.
The True Doctor wrote:
It's most likely that the DEI hire that wrote this episode wanted to use >>>>> it to spread his racist agenda, failing to mention that Gatwa's own
ancestors mutilated and murdered each other in Rwanda despite all of >>>>> them being black,
Why would they mention the _actor’s_ ancestors?
Because the entire episode was about Gatwa being black,
No.
Yes it was.
The episode was an allegory about how AI is transforming the>creative arts. The business about the Doctor being black was
It had nothing to do with AI. Did you not see Gatwa's lecture at the
start about him not feeling accepted in white countries because of his
skin colour, or did you not understand it?
just there to add a bit of colour (no pun intended) with an
unusual setting.
so of course
they have to mention his ancestors and the genocide they carried out
against each other instead of the woke hypocrites blaming all white
people as being the racists.
You did notice that the villain in this story was black, didn’t you?
Like I said, the story was all about being black.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." -William Shatner
The True Doctor wrote:
On 10/05/2025 21:56, solar imbecile wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 10/05/2025 20:16, solar imbecile wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
It's most likely that the DEI hire that wrote this episode wanted to use >>>>>> it to spread his racist agenda, failing to mention that Gatwa's own >>>>>> ancestors mutilated and murdered each other in Rwanda despite all of >>>>>> them being black,
Why would they mention the _actor’s_ ancestors?
Because the entire episode was about Gatwa being black,
No.
Yes it was.
The episode was an allegory about how AI is transforming the
creative arts. The business about the Doctor being black was
It had nothing to do with AI. Did you not see Gatwa's lecture at the
start about him not feeling accepted in white countries because of his
skin colour, or did you not understand it?
And if that had been all there was to the episode, you might have
a point.
However, there were also other things going on in the episode. Things
that had nothing to do with the lead actor’s skin.
There was a character called the Barber. He used to be a
story teller. He told stories the old fashioned way for thousands
of years. Just like people have been creating stories and art
the old fashioned way for thousands of years.
Then he created the nexus web and the story engine to artificially
combine and reassemble stories for him to make his job easier.
Just like AI bots trawl the web for data and recombine it in
new ways. (The Barber even literally refers to the nexus as the
World Wide Web at one point; this isn’t exactly subtle!)
Eventually the story engine means the old storyteller was no
longer needed. Just as some people are worried that AI will
put creative artists out of work.
He wants to destroy it, but it’s too late. Instead he’ll just have
to learn to live with it. Just as… well, you get the idea.
Did you really miss all that because you were busy obsessing over
the colour of one man’s skin?
You did notice that the villain in this story was black, didn’t you?
Like I said, the story was all about being black.
Make up your mind! First you said it was all about Gatwa being
black. Now it’s apparently about someone else being black. Which
is it?
The asswipe attempted arithmetic:
In article <c13a14c06dd07b2e214e6a44a6ec87c0@www.novabbs.com>,
Theory11 <card.master@bee92.invalid.com> wrote:
Six out of ten, mainly because the episode looked really good
and the doctor was the main focus this week.
So 4 = 6 is 10 / 2
Maths isn’t your strong point, is it ?
And that was all there was to the episode. It was degenerate
woke messaging
This was a childish attack on the Internet to create yet
another woke false narrative because anyone that uses the
Internet is able to easily expose their lies, deceptions and
rewriting of history and literature by looking up the original
sources, and the woke can't stop them.
As usual the infantile woke writer is incapable of debating
this logically and rationally so attacks the Internet without
giving reason and then renames his world wide web to the
cosmic nexus, which illustrates it had nothing to do with the
internet to begin with.
It seems you are the one who missed everything because of your
obsession with acting as an apologist for woke propaganda.
Remember the lessons I have taught you. The woke only want to
write about themselves and their own perversions and personal
messages, and this story is yet another embodiment of this
degenerate philosophy as have been all the other episodes in
the series.
The True Doctor wrote:
And that was all there was to the episode. It was degenerate
woke messaging
To any regular reader of RADW every episode of Doctor Who seems
to be "degenerate woke messaging".
This was a childish attack on the Internet to create yet
another woke false narrative because anyone that uses the
Internet is able to easily expose their lies, deceptions and
rewriting of history and literature by looking up the original
sources, and the woke can't stop them.
As usual the infantile woke writer is incapable of debating
this logically and rationally so attacks the Internet without
giving reason and then renames his world wide web to the
cosmic nexus, which illustrates it had nothing to do with the
internet to begin with.
It seems you are the one who missed everything because of your
obsession with acting as an apologist for woke propaganda.
Remember the lessons I have taught you. The woke only want to
write about themselves and their own perversions and personal
messages, and this story is yet another embodiment of this
degenerate philosophy as have been all the other episodes in
the series.
Your homework lesson for next week is to write your episode
review of "The Interstellar Song Contest" without using the word
'woke' in it... consider it a challenge to keep yourself
entertained, as clearly watching Doctor Who doesn't entertain
you any more.
In article <xn0p5o6lc1cod6e000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
And that was all there was to the episode. It was degenerate
woke messaging
To any regular reader of RADW every episode of Doctor Who seems
to be "degenerate woke messaging".
This was a childish attack on the Internet to create yet
another woke false narrative because anyone that uses the
Internet is able to easily expose their lies, deceptions and
rewriting of history and literature by looking up the original
sources, and the woke can't stop them.
As usual the infantile woke writer is incapable of debating
this logically and rationally so attacks the Internet without
giving reason and then renames his world wide web to the
cosmic nexus, which illustrates it had nothing to do with the
internet to begin with.
It seems you are the one who missed everything because of your
obsession with acting as an apologist for woke propaganda.
Remember the lessons I have taught you. The woke only want to
write about themselves and their own perversions and personal
messages, and this story is yet another embodiment of this
degenerate philosophy as have been all the other episodes in
the series.
Your homework lesson for next week is to write your episode
review of "The Interstellar Song Contest" without using the word
'woke' in it... consider it a challenge to keep yourself
entertained, as clearly watching Doctor Who doesn't entertain
you any more.
Just between FA Cup and Eurovision?
Go CP BTW!
The True Doctor wrote:
And that was all there was to the episode. It was degenerate
woke messaging
To any regular reader of RADW every episode of Doctor Who seems
to be "degenerate woke messaging".
This was a childish attack on the Internet to create yet
another woke false narrative because anyone that uses the
Internet is able to easily expose their lies, deceptions and
rewriting of history and literature by looking up the original
sources, and the woke can't stop them.
As usual the infantile woke writer is incapable of debating
this logically and rationally so attacks the Internet without
giving reason and then renames his world wide web to the
cosmic nexus, which illustrates it had nothing to do with the
internet to begin with.
It seems you are the one who missed everything because of your
obsession with acting as an apologist for woke propaganda.
Remember the lessons I have taught you. The woke only want to
write about themselves and their own perversions and personal
messages, and this story is yet another embodiment of this
degenerate philosophy as have been all the other episodes in
the series.
Your homework lesson for next week is to write your episode
review of "The Interstellar Song Contest" without using the word
'woke' in it... consider it a challenge to keep yourself
entertained, as clearly watching Doctor Who doesn't entertain
you any more.
On 11/05/2025 12:43, The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0p5o6lc1cod6e000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
And that was all there was to the episode. It was degenerate
woke messaging
To any regular reader of RADW every episode of Doctor Who seems
to be "degenerate woke messaging".
This was a childish attack on the Internet to create yet
another woke false narrative because anyone that uses the
Internet is able to easily expose their lies, deceptions and
rewriting of history and literature by looking up the original
sources, and the woke can't stop them.
As usual the infantile woke writer is incapable of debating
this logically and rationally so attacks the Internet without
giving reason and then renames his world wide web to the
cosmic nexus, which illustrates it had nothing to do with the
internet to begin with.
It seems you are the one who missed everything because of your
obsession with acting as an apologist for woke propaganda.
Remember the lessons I have taught you. The woke only want to
write about themselves and their own perversions and personal
messages, and this story is yet another embodiment of this
degenerate philosophy as have been all the other episodes in
the series.
Your homework lesson for next week is to write your episode
review of "The Interstellar Song Contest" without using the word
'woke' in it... consider it a challenge to keep yourself
entertained, as clearly watching Doctor Who doesn't entertain
you any more.
Just between FA Cup and Eurovision?
Go CP BTW!
If the FA Cup goes to penalties Doctor Whoke won't even be shown.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." -William Shatner
On 11/05/2025 12:10, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
Remember the lessons I have taught you. The woke only want
to write about themselves and their own perversions and
personal messages, and this story is yet another
embodiment of this degenerate philosophy as have been all
the other episodes in the series.
Your homework lesson for next week is to write your episode
review of "The Interstellar Song Contest" without using the
word 'woke' in it... consider it a challenge to keep yourself
entertained, as clearly watching Doctor Who doesn't entertain
you any more.
Doctor Who ended in 2017. I am not going to enter you web of
denial of wokery like the imbecilic emperor who denied that he
was wearing nothing on his birthday parade.
The True loon lost the ability to look beyond:
On 10/05/2025 23:00, solar imbecile wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 10/05/2025 21:56, solar imbecile wrote:
The episode was an allegory about how AI is transforming the
creative arts. The business about the Doctor being black was
It had nothing to do with AI. Did you not see Gatwa's lecture at the
start about him not feeling accepted in white countries because of his >>>> skin colour, or did you not understand it?
And if that had been all there was to the episode, you might have
a point.
And that was all there was to the episode. It was degenerate woke
messaging inserted into a feeble narrative the meant absolutely nothing
so that the brainwashing could not be questioned or diluted.
You missed missed the deeper allegory because you kept getting
distracted by surface details. (Literally “surface” details, the >actor’s skin.)
You need to put aside your obsession with race and politics and
see what was actually in the episode.
Racism is bad. Slavery is bad.
That’s “degenerate woke messaging”? So you’re in favour of
slavery now?
Homosexuality is what what everyone must submit to.
But the Fugitive Doctor _didn’t_ submit to homosexuality. She
refused to marry Abby.
Congratulations! You literally got the exact opposite of what
happened in the episode!
(* snip more walls of word salad that don’t add anything *)
--
solar penguin
The True Doctor wrote:
On 11/05/2025 12:10, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
Remember the lessons I have taught you. The woke only want
to write about themselves and their own perversions and
personal messages, and this story is yet another
embodiment of this degenerate philosophy as have been all
the other episodes in the series.
Your homework lesson for next week is to write your episode
review of "The Interstellar Song Contest" without using the
word 'woke' in it... consider it a challenge to keep yourself
entertained, as clearly watching Doctor Who doesn't entertain
you any more.
Doctor Who ended in 2017. I am not going to enter you web of
denial of wokery like the imbecilic emperor who denied that he
was wearing nothing on his birthday parade.
Go on, just for the craic... go for it... clever people like you
should relish a challenge!
The True Doctor wrote:
On 10/05/2025 23:00, solar imbecile wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 10/05/2025 21:56, solar imbecile wrote:
The episode was an allegory about how AI is transforming the
creative arts. The business about the Doctor being black was
It had nothing to do with AI. Did you not see Gatwa's lecture at the
start about him not feeling accepted in white countries because of his >>>> skin colour, or did you not understand it?
And if that had been all there was to the episode, you might have
a point.
And that was all there was to the episode. It was degenerate woke
messaging inserted into a feeble narrative the meant absolutely nothing
so that the brainwashing could not be questioned or diluted.
You missed missed the deeper allegory because you kept getting
distracted by surface details. (Literally “surface” details, the actor’s skin.)
You need to put aside your obsession with race and politics and
see what was actually in the episode.
Racism is bad. Slavery is bad.
That’s “degenerate woke messaging”? So you’re in favour of
slavery now?
Homosexuality is what what everyone must submit to.
But the Fugitive Doctor _didn’t_ submit to homosexuality. She
refused to marry Abby.
Congratulations! You literally got the exact opposite of what
happened in the episode!
On 12/05/2025 08:38, solar imbecile wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 10/05/2025 23:00, solar imbecile wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 10/05/2025 21:56, solar imbecile wrote:
The episode was an allegory about how AI is transforming the
creative arts. The business about the Doctor being black was
It had nothing to do with AI. Did you not see Gatwa's lecture at the >>>>> start about him not feeling accepted in white countries because of his >>>>> skin colour, or did you not understand it?
And if that had been all there was to the episode, you might have
a point.
And that was all there was to the episode. It was degenerate woke
messaging inserted into a feeble narrative the meant absolutely nothing
so that the brainwashing could not be questioned or diluted.
You missed missed the deeper allegory because you kept getting
distracted by surface details. (Literally “surface” details, the
actor’s skin.)
There was no deeper allegory other than the fact that the story
represented the perverted mind of the author and his moral degeneracy.
You need to put aside your obsession with race and politics and
see what was actually in the episode.
It's the degenerate woke writers that are obsessed with race and
politics. Why else do you think they keep inserting it into every single >episode? It's because they're the racists and bigots themselves and they
have to keep virtue signalling to the audience to pretend that they're
not. Don't they have anything else to say other than repeating their >degenerate perversion in every single story?
Racism is bad. Slavery is bad.
That’s “degenerate woke messaging”? So you’re in favour of
slavery now?
It's the same message in every story. Don't you think the audience would >already know they are bad? The perverted, degenerate, sick, and
disgusting woke writers obviously think they are not so have to keep >repeating to everyone that they are to defect from their guilt.
Homosexuality is what what everyone must submit to.
But the Fugitive Doctor _didn’t_ submit to homosexuality. She
refused to marry Abby.
And it was considered bad that she didn't marry her.
Congratulations! You literally got the exact opposite of what
happened in the episode!
You are the one who failed to understand the message. The woke want you
to accept their sick and degenerate sexual advances and perversion
without questioning them and their morality, especially children. Their
whole entire movement was created in order to promote homosexuality and >legalise sex with minors because the whole of Hollywood, the
entertainment industry, and media is full of sex obsessed perverts and >pederasts. Look at Roman Polanski, Jimmy Saville and Huw Edwards.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." -William Shatner
The moment the fakes came on is the moment we weere cryig to
see Love and Monsters.
The Doctor wrote:
The moment the fakes came on is the moment we weere cryig to
see Love and Monsters.
Well obviously a Doctor that is black AND female is too much for
some people to handle... but if you prefer "Love and Monsters"
it must only be because a paving slab is the closet you can get
to not having to play with yourself.
The True loon is trying hard to lose the argument:
On 12/05/2025 08:38, solar imbecile wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
And that was all there was to the episode. It was degenerate woke
messaging inserted into a feeble narrative the meant absolutely nothing >>>> so that the brainwashing could not be questioned or diluted.
You missed missed the deeper allegory because you kept getting
distracted by surface details. (Literally “surface” details, the
actor’s skin.)
There was no deeper allegory other than the fact that the story
represented the perverted mind of the author and his moral degeneracy.
Closing your eyes and ignoring the real facts won’t make them
go away.
Face it, you’re just not very good at spotting allegory. Remember how
you completely missed the one in Eaters Of Light because you
were distracted by a character’s sexual orientation and skin
colour.
(* SNIP *)
But the Fugitive Doctor _didn’t_ submit to homosexuality. She
refused to marry Abby.
And it was considered bad that she didn't marry her.
Abby thought it was bad, because being the daughter of
a god made her selfish and entitled. Belinda persuaded Abby
that she was wrong and needed to let it go.
But even without Belinda’s intervention, whenever there’s a
disagreement between the Doctor and a guest character, it’s
generally safe to assume the Doctor’s right and the other one
is wrong.
You are the one who failed to understand the message. The woke want you
to accept their sick and degenerate sexual advances and perversion
without questioning them and their morality, especially children. Their
whole entire movement was created in order to promote homosexuality and
legalise sex with minors because the whole of Hollywood, the
entertainment industry, and media is full of sex obsessed perverts and
pederasts. Look at Roman Polanski, Jimmy Saville and Huw Edwards.
IMHO in expect that in percentage terms, the proportion of
celebrities who are child abusers is probably more or less the
same as the general population. It’s just that we notice the
celebrity ones more because, well, they’re celebrities.
You claim to be interested in statistics, so I’m surprised you
hadn’t thought of that yourself.
The True loon is trying hard to lose the argument:
On 12/05/2025 08:38, solar imbecile wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
And that was all there was to the episode. It was degenerate woke
messaging inserted into a feeble narrative the meant absolutely nothing >>>> so that the brainwashing could not be questioned or diluted.
You missed missed the deeper allegory because you kept getting
distracted by surface details. (Literally “surface” details, the
actor’s skin.)
There was no deeper allegory other than the fact that the story
represented the perverted mind of the author and his moral degeneracy.
Closing your eyes and ignoring the real facts won’t make them
go away.
Face it, you’re just not very good at spotting allegory. Remember how
you completely missed the one in Eaters Of Light because you
were distracted by a character’s sexual orientation and skin
colour.
(* SNIP *)
But the Fugitive Doctor _didn’t_ submit to homosexuality. She
refused to marry Abby.
And it was considered bad that she didn't marry her.
Abby thought it was bad, because being the daughter of
a god made her selfish and entitled. Belinda persuaded Abby
that she was wrong and needed to let it go.
But even without Belinda’s intervention, whenever there’s a
disagreement between the Doctor and a guest character, it’s
generally safe to assume the Doctor’s right and the other one
is wrong.
You are the one who failed to understand the message. The woke want you
to accept their sick and degenerate sexual advances and perversion
without questioning them and their morality, especially children. Their
whole entire movement was created in order to promote homosexuality and
legalise sex with minors because the whole of Hollywood, the
entertainment industry, and media is full of sex obsessed perverts and
pederasts. Look at Roman Polanski, Jimmy Saville and Huw Edwards.
IMHO in expect that in percentage terms, the proportion of
celebrities who are child abusers is probably more or less the
same as the general population. It’s just that we notice the
celebrity ones more because, well, they’re celebrities.
You claim to be interested in statistics, so I’m surprised you
hadn’t thought of that yourself.
--
solar penguin
On 5/14/2025 05:27, solar penguin wrote:
The True loon is trying hard to lose the argument:
On 12/05/2025 08:38, solar imbecile wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
And that was all there was to the episode. It was degenerate woke
messaging inserted into a feeble narrative the meant absolutely nothing >>>>> so that the brainwashing could not be questioned or diluted.
You missed missed the deeper allegory because you kept getting
distracted by surface details. (Literally “surface” details, the
actor’s skin.)
There was no deeper allegory other than the fact that the story
represented the perverted mind of the author and his moral degeneracy.
Closing your eyes and ignoring the real facts won’t make them
go away.
Face it, you’re just not very good at spotting allegory. Remember how
you completely missed the one in Eaters Of Light because you
were distracted by a character’s sexual orientation and skin
colour.
(* SNIP *)
But the Fugitive Doctor _didn’t_ submit to homosexuality. She
refused to marry Abby.
And it was considered bad that she didn't marry her.
Abby thought it was bad, because being the daughter of
a god made her selfish and entitled. Belinda persuaded Abby
that she was wrong and needed to let it go.
But even without Belinda’s intervention, whenever there’s a
disagreement between the Doctor and a guest character, it’s
generally safe to assume the Doctor’s right and the other one
is wrong.
You are the one who failed to understand the message. The woke want you
to accept their sick and degenerate sexual advances and perversion
without questioning them and their morality, especially children. Their
whole entire movement was created in order to promote homosexuality and
legalise sex with minors because the whole of Hollywood, the
entertainment industry, and media is full of sex obsessed perverts and
pederasts. Look at Roman Polanski, Jimmy Saville and Huw Edwards.
IMHO in expect that in percentage terms, the proportion of
celebrities who are child abusers is probably more or less the
same as the general population. It’s just that we notice the
celebrity ones more because, well, they’re celebrities.
You claim to be interested in statistics, so I’m surprised you
hadn’t thought of that yourself.
He probably did...but then that particular statistic doesn't fit his >narrative.
--
Intelligence is no guarantee against being dead wrong.
--Carl Sagan
The first casualty of war is the truth.
The Doctor wrote:
The first casualty of war is the truth.
We are discussing a TV show... not planning a war. It's this
attitude that shows how stupid some fans are. They believe they
ARE fighting a war and every discussion has to be an argument.
We all like "Doctor Who" or we wouldn't be here... but we all
have our own likes and dislikes about the show. There's nothing
wrong with that. Doctor Who fandom is a broad church. It's the
constant bitching about the show and wanting to see it cancelled
that I have an issue with, as no fan should want to see a show
they claim to be a fan of cancelled. It makes the term 'Doctor
Who fan" an oxymoron.
In article <xn0p5reto5sq9kp004@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
The moment the fakes came on is the moment we weere cryig to
see Love and Monsters.
Well obviously a Doctor that is black AND female is too much
for some people to handle... but if you prefer "Love and
Monsters" it must only be because a paving slab is the
closet you can get to not having to play with yourself.
You might have been crying to see Delta and the Bannermen!
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0p5reto5sq9kp004@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
The moment the fakes came on is the moment we weere cryig to
see Love and Monsters.
Well obviously a Doctor that is black AND female is too much
for some people to handle... but if you prefer "Love and
Monsters" it must only be because a paving slab is the
closet you can get to not having to play with yourself.
You might have been crying to see Delta and the Bannermen!
I doubt it could ever be THAT bad...
The Doctor wrote:
The first casualty of war is the truth.
We are discussing a TV show... not planning a war. It's this
attitude that shows how stupid some fans are. They believe they
ARE fighting a war and every discussion has to be an argument.
We all like "Doctor Who" or we wouldn't be here... but we all
have our own likes and dislikes about the show. There's nothing
wrong with that. Doctor Who fandom is a broad church. It's the
constant bitching about the show and wanting to see it cancelled
that I have an issue with, as no fan should want to see a show
they claim to be a fan of cancelled. It makes the term 'Doctor
Who fan" an oxymoron.
Idlehands wrote:^^^^^<-PAedophile talker noted
On 2025-05-14 7:24 a.m., Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
The first casualty of war is the truth.
We are discussing a TV show... not planning a war. It's this
attitude that shows how stupid some fans are. They believe they
ARE fighting a war and every discussion has to be an argument.
We all like "Doctor Who" or we wouldn't be here... but we all
have our own likes and dislikes about the show. There's nothing
wrong with that. Doctor Who fandom is a broad church. It's the
constant bitching about the show and wanting to see it cancelled
that I have an issue with, as no fan should want to see a show
they claim to be a fan of cancelled. It makes the term 'Doctor
Who fan" an oxymoron.
Very good points and a well reasoned argument in the spirit of cordial
discussion.
All wasted on a man-child like binky and his BFF Aggy.
i thought i was the bff ,
Sad, just sad.
you're 2 timing on me idgit
In article <xn0p5shz7zeedy000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
The first casualty of war is the truth.
We are discussing a TV show... not planning a war. It's this
attitude that shows how stupid some fans are. They believe
they ARE fighting a war and every discussion has to be an
argument.
We all like "Doctor Who" or we wouldn't be here... but we all
have our own likes and dislikes about the show. There's
nothing wrong with that. Doctor Who fandom is a broad
church. It's the constant bitching about the show and
wanting to see it cancelled that I have an issue with, as no
fan should want to see a show they claim to be a fan of
cancelled. It makes the term 'Doctor Who fan" an oxymoron.
Give that at least 6 groups of DW fans are identified ...
In article <vvrcb3$mpt9$2@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 11/05/2025 12:43, The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0p5o6lc1cod6e000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
And that was all there was to the episode. It was degenerate
woke messaging
To any regular reader of RADW every episode of Doctor Who seems
to be "degenerate woke messaging".
This was a childish attack on the Internet to create yet
another woke false narrative because anyone that uses the
Internet is able to easily expose their lies, deceptions and
rewriting of history and literature by looking up the original
sources, and the woke can't stop them.
As usual the infantile woke writer is incapable of debating
this logically and rationally so attacks the Internet without
giving reason and then renames his world wide web to the
cosmic nexus, which illustrates it had nothing to do with the
internet to begin with.
It seems you are the one who missed everything because of your
obsession with acting as an apologist for woke propaganda.
Remember the lessons I have taught you. The woke only want to
write about themselves and their own perversions and personal
messages, and this story is yet another embodiment of this
degenerate philosophy as have been all the other episodes in
the series.
Your homework lesson for next week is to write your episode
review of "The Interstellar Song Contest" without using the word
'woke' in it... consider it a challenge to keep yourself
entertained, as clearly watching Doctor Who doesn't entertain
you any more.
Just between FA Cup and Eurovision?
Go CP BTW!
If the FA Cup goes to penalties Doctor Whoke won't even be shown.
We shall see. BBC 2 might air it later.
Still Place to kick Man C given Mancheating City's current form.
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0p5shz7zeedy000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
The first casualty of war is the truth.
We are discussing a TV show... not planning a war. It's this
attitude that shows how stupid some fans are. They believe
they ARE fighting a war and every discussion has to be an
argument.
We all like "Doctor Who" or we wouldn't be here... but we all
have our own likes and dislikes about the show. There's
nothing wrong with that. Doctor Who fandom is a broad
church. It's the constant bitching about the show and
wanting to see it cancelled that I have an issue with, as no
fan should want to see a show they claim to be a fan of
cancelled. It makes the term 'Doctor Who fan" an oxymoron.
Give that at least 6 groups of DW fans are identified ...
That's not the point I am making.
My point is, if you claim to be a fan of a TV show, any show,
then you wouldn't spend your time calling for that show to be
cancelled, as you are a fan. Sure, you might call for changes
and improvements going forward as you think it might make the
show better or more popular. You might even want to discuss the
things you dislike about the show with similar minded fans in an
online forum... but you shouldn't want to kill something you
claim to like. It's not logical.
So anybody who states they want to see Doctor Who cancelled is
not a Doctor Who fan.
The Doctor wrote:
In article <F72cnR4jrJbZ07j1nZ2dnZfqnPsAAAAA@giganews.com>,he's certainly got the tail for it ,
% <pursent100@gmail.com> wrote:
Idlehands wrote:^^^^^<-PAedophile talker noted
On 2025-05-14 7:24 a.m., Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
The first casualty of war is the truth.
We are discussing a TV show... not planning a war. It's this
attitude that shows how stupid some fans are. They believe they
ARE fighting a war and every discussion has to be an argument.
We all like "Doctor Who" or we wouldn't be here... but we all
have our own likes and dislikes about the show. There's nothing
wrong with that. Doctor Who fandom is a broad church. It's the
constant bitching about the show and wanting to see it cancelled
that I have an issue with, as no fan should want to see a show
they claim to be a fan of cancelled. It makes the term 'Doctor
Who fan" an oxymoron.
Very good points and a well reasoned argument in the spirit of cordial >>>> discussion.
All wasted on a man-child like binky and his BFF Aggy.
i thought i was the bff ,
Sad, just sad.
you're 2 timing on me idgit
Idlehands is Satan in disguise.
just wait there's no way the oilers will win the cup ,
we can get him then when he'll already be sad
On 12/05/2025 04:11, The Doctor wrote:
In article <vvrcb3$mpt9$2@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 11/05/2025 12:43, The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0p5o6lc1cod6e000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
And that was all there was to the episode. It was degenerate
woke messaging
To any regular reader of RADW every episode of Doctor Who seems
to be "degenerate woke messaging".
This was a childish attack on the Internet to create yet
another woke false narrative because anyone that uses the
Internet is able to easily expose their lies, deceptions and
rewriting of history and literature by looking up the original
sources, and the woke can't stop them.
As usual the infantile woke writer is incapable of debating
this logically and rationally so attacks the Internet without
giving reason and then renames his world wide web to the
cosmic nexus, which illustrates it had nothing to do with the
internet to begin with.
It seems you are the one who missed everything because of your
obsession with acting as an apologist for woke propaganda.
Remember the lessons I have taught you. The woke only want to
write about themselves and their own perversions and personal
messages, and this story is yet another embodiment of this
degenerate philosophy as have been all the other episodes in
the series.
Your homework lesson for next week is to write your episode
review of "The Interstellar Song Contest" without using the word
'woke' in it... consider it a challenge to keep yourself
entertained, as clearly watching Doctor Who doesn't entertain
you any more.
Just between FA Cup and Eurovision?
Go CP BTW!
If the FA Cup goes to penalties Doctor Whoke won't even be shown.
We shall see. BBC 2 might air it later.
Everyone will be watching the real Eurovision Song Contest not a
perverted woke parody.
Still Place to kick Man C given Mancheating City's current form.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." -William Shatner
On 12/05/2025 04:11, The Doctor wrote:
In article <vvrcb3$mpt9$2@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
If the FA Cup goes to penalties Doctor Whoke won't even be shown.
We shall see. BBC 2 might air it later.
Everyone will be watching the real Eurovision Song Contest not a
perverted woke parody.