Sysop: | Amessyroom |
---|---|
Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
Users: | 28 |
Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
Uptime: | 64:08:30 |
Calls: | 425 |
Calls today: | 3 |
Files: | 1,025 |
Messages: | 91,327 |
Posted today: | 1 |
Doctor Who s2e3 "Lucky Day" is the lowest rated episode ever. Russell T. >Davies and Ncuti Gatwa have burned all fan goodwill.
https://youtu.be/hj9tPqkD5Dw?si=PevPZS5xw6UFhhjB
--
Dems & the media want Trump to be more like Obama, but then he'd
have to audit liberals & wire tap reporters' phones.
In article <vvfftt$vqcm$3@dont-email.me>,
Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
Doctor Who s2e3 "Lucky Day" is the lowest rated episode
ever. Russell T. Davies and Ncuti Gatwa have burned all fan
goodwill.
https://youtu.be/hj9tPqkD5Dw?si=PevPZS5xw6UFhhjB
Moreso RTD for preserving the Timeless Child.
The Doctor wrote:
In article <vvfftt$vqcm$3@dont-email.me>,
Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
Doctor Who s2e3 "Lucky Day" is the lowest rated episodeMoreso RTD for preserving the Timeless Child.
ever. Russell T. Davies and Ncuti Gatwa have burned all fan
goodwill.
https://youtu.be/hj9tPqkD5Dw?si=PevPZS5xw6UFhhjB
Which the general TV watching public couldn't actually give a
damn about... only a few obsessive types want to keep banging
that drum. The female Doctor has gone, it's time to move on.
Had RTD retconned the Timeless Child arc during S1/S14 it
wouldn't have made a blind bit of difference to the show this
season. The Doctor Who 'fans' who are anti a black gay man
playing the Doctor would still be anti a black gay man playing
the Doctor.
The Doctor wrote:
In article <vvfftt$vqcm$3@dont-email.me>,
Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
Doctor Who s2e3 "Lucky Day" is the lowest rated episodeMoreso RTD for preserving the Timeless Child.
ever. Russell T. Davies and Ncuti Gatwa have burned all fan
goodwill.
https://youtu.be/hj9tPqkD5Dw?si=PevPZS5xw6UFhhjB
Which the general TV watching public couldn't actually give a
damn about... only a few obsessive types want to keep banging
that drum. The female Doctor has gone, it's time to move on.
Had RTD retconned the Timeless Child arc during S1/S14 it
wouldn't have made a blind bit of difference to the show this
season. The Doctor Who 'fans' who are anti a black gay man
playing the Doctor would still be anti a black gay man playing
the Doctor.
On 08/05/2025 10:32, Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Moreso RTD for preserving the Timeless Child.
Which the general TV watching public couldn't actually give a
damn about... only a few obsessive types want to keep banging
Wrong! Turning the main protagonist into a genocidal monster
that is running way from its crimes is what drove the general
audience away.
The True Doctor wrote:
On 08/05/2025 10:32, Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Moreso RTD for preserving the Timeless Child.
Which the general TV watching public couldn't actually give a
damn about... only a few obsessive types want to keep banging
Wrong! Turning the main protagonist into a genocidal monster
that is running way from its crimes is what drove the general
audience away.
Well, viewers are turning away from the likes of EastEnders
too... what did that show do wrong? Even the ratings the BBC
News have fallen, so maybe all the genocide that's going on in
the world today has driven those viewers away too?
Whatever the story is, the great news is it hasn't stopped youDoctor Who ended in 2017! Nobody actually watches Doctor Whoke. Look at
from watching it, so Doctor Who must still have some merit to it!
On 09/05/2025 09:50, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 08/05/2025 10:32, Blueshirt wrote:
Which the general TV watching public couldn't actually
give a damn about... only a few obsessive types want to
keep banging
Wrong! Turning the main protagonist into a genocidal
monster that is running way from its crimes is what drove
the general audience away.
Well, viewers are turning away from the likes of EastEnders
too... what did that show do wrong?
Because it's degenerate woke garbage that spreads racism and
hate.
Even the ratings for the BBC News have fallen, so maybe
all the genocide that's going on in the world today has
driven those viewers away too?
The News got more viewers than Doctor Whoke.
It's because it's being written for imbecilic women of very
low intelligence that are driven by over-simplistic sentiment
and emotion. The election coverage last week was unwatchable
because it was presented by a bunch of woke women that don't
understand politics or anything. Actual intelligent women I
discussed the election win knew Farage was going to win by a
landslide and exactly why.
Whatever the story is, the great news is it hasn't stopped
you from watching it, so Doctor Who must still have some
merit to it!
Doctor Who ended in 2017! Nobody actually watches Doctor
Whoke.
Look at the ratings being flushed down the toilet. 1.5
million so-called viewers is just the people who have their TV
turned on all day tuned into BBC1 what they do something other
than watching it.
The True Doctor wrote:
On 09/05/2025 09:50, Blueshirt wrote:
Whatever the story is, the great news is it hasn't stopped
you from watching it, so Doctor Who must still have some
merit to it!
Doctor Who ended in 2017! Nobody actually watches Doctor
Whoke.
Well... you do!
On 9/05/2025 8:34 pm, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 09/05/2025 09:50, Blueshirt wrote:
<Snip>
Whatever the story is, the great news is it hasn't stopped
you from watching it, so Doctor Who must still have some
merit to it!
Doctor Who ended in 2017! Nobody actually watches Doctor
Whoke.
Well... you do!
Yes, Blueshirt, ...... so Aggy *IS* Nobody!!
The True Doctor wrote:
On 09/05/2025 09:50, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 08/05/2025 10:32, Blueshirt wrote:
Which the general TV watching public couldn't actually
give a damn about... only a few obsessive types want to
keep banging
Wrong! Turning the main protagonist into a genocidal
monster that is running way from its crimes is what drove
the general audience away.
Well, viewers are turning away from the likes of EastEnders
too... what did that show do wrong?
Because it's degenerate woke garbage that spreads racism and
hate.
Haven't watched it in years so I'll take your word for it.
Even the ratings for the BBC News have fallen, so maybe
all the genocide that's going on in the world today has
driven those viewers away too?
The News got more viewers than Doctor Whoke.
Ratings for TV news is still declining... so there has to be a
proper reason for all these programmes having declining
viewership figures?
It's because it's being written for imbecilic women of very
low intelligence that are driven by over-simplistic sentiment
and emotion. The election coverage last week was unwatchable
because it was presented by a bunch of woke women that don't
understand politics or anything. Actual intelligent women I
discussed the election win knew Farage was going to win by a
landslide and exactly why.
Oh, it's written for "imbecilic women"... <rolls eyes>
Whatever the story is, the great news is it hasn't stopped
you from watching it, so Doctor Who must still have some
merit to it!
Doctor Who ended in 2017! Nobody actually watches Doctor
Whoke.
Well... you do!
I did not watch it on-air so I don't count for the overnight statistics.Look at the ratings being flushed down the toilet. 1.5
million so-called viewers is just the people who have their TV
turned on all day tuned into BBC1 what they do something other
than watching it.
Even when people watch it [like you do] you claim nobody is
watching it!!! Yet you and the YouTubers that are always moaning
about Doctor Who still watch the show, so logically people must
be watching it. How can people complain about it if they don'tThey didn't watch it. They reviewed it. Reviewers don't count as
watch it? So they are not "so called" viewers... however, they
are so called fans!
On 09/05/2025 11:34, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 09/05/2025 09:50, Blueshirt wrote:
Well, viewers are turning away from the likes of
EastEnders too... what did that show do wrong?
Because it's degenerate woke garbage that spreads racism
and hate.
Haven't watched it in years so I'll take your word for it.
Look it up in the papers.
All these woke soap-opera writers have been taught
to do is write characters based on their own
personalities, but since they are all sick and disgusting vile
perverts and degenerate racists, sexists, and bigots, that's
all that they can write about. This is why these perverts
virtue signal in order to cover up the disgusting vile
individuals they actually are. Look at RTD who is a sexually
harassing incel so almost every character he writes, such as
Ncuti Gatwa, is a sexually harassing incel
The True Doctor wrote:
On 08/05/2025 10:32, Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Moreso RTD for preserving the Timeless Child.
Which the general TV watching public couldn't actually give a
damn about... only a few obsessive types want to keep banging
Wrong! Turning the main protagonist into a genocidal monster
that is running way from its crimes is what drove the general
audience away.
Well, viewers are turning away from the likes of EastEnders
too... what did that show do wrong? Even the ratings the BBC
News have fallen, so maybe all the genocide that's going on in
the world today has driven those viewers away too?
Whatever the story is, the great news is it hasn't stopped you
from watching it, so Doctor Who must still have some merit to it!
The True Doctor wrote:
On 09/05/2025 09:50, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 08/05/2025 10:32, Blueshirt wrote:
Which the general TV watching public couldn't actually
give a damn about... only a few obsessive types want to
keep banging
Wrong! Turning the main protagonist into a genocidal
monster that is running way from its crimes is what drove
the general audience away.
Well, viewers are turning away from the likes of EastEnders
too... what did that show do wrong?
Because it's degenerate woke garbage that spreads racism and
hate.
Haven't watched it in years so I'll take your word for it.
Even the ratings for the BBC News have fallen, so maybe
all the genocide that's going on in the world today has
driven those viewers away too?
The News got more viewers than Doctor Whoke.
Ratings for TV news is still declining... so there has to be a
proper reason for all these programmes having declining
viewership figures?
It's because it's being written for imbecilic women of very
low intelligence that are driven by over-simplistic sentiment
and emotion. The election coverage last week was unwatchable
because it was presented by a bunch of woke women that don't
understand politics or anything. Actual intelligent women I
discussed the election win knew Farage was going to win by a
landslide and exactly why.
Oh, it's written for "imbecilic women"... <rolls eyes>
Whatever the story is, the great news is it hasn't stopped
you from watching it, so Doctor Who must still have some
merit to it!
Doctor Who ended in 2017! Nobody actually watches Doctor
Whoke.
Well... you do!
Look at the ratings being flushed down the toilet. 1.5
million so-called viewers is just the people who have their TV
turned on all day tuned into BBC1 what they do something other
than watching it.
Even when people watch it [like you do] you claim nobody is
watching it!!! Yet you and the YouTubers that are always moaning
about Doctor Who still watch the show, so logically people must
be watching it. How can people complain about it if they don't
watch it? So they are not "so called" viewers... however, they
are so called fans!
On 9/05/2025 8:34 pm, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 09/05/2025 09:50, Blueshirt wrote:
<Snip>
Whatever the story is, the great news is it hasn't stopped
you from watching it, so Doctor Who must still have some
merit to it!
Doctor Who ended in 2017! Nobody actually watches Doctor
Whoke.
Well... you do!
Yes, Blueshirt, ...... so Aggy *IS* Nobody!!
--
Daniel70
On 09/05/2025 13:22, Daniel70 wrote:
On 9/05/2025 8:34 pm, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 09/05/2025 09:50, Blueshirt wrote:
<Snip>
Whatever the story is, the great news is it hasn't stopped
you from watching it, so Doctor Who must still have some
merit to it!
Doctor Who ended in 2017! Nobody actually watches Doctor
Whoke.
Well... you do!
Yes, Blueshirt, ...... so Aggy *IS* Nobody!!
That's Odysseus. Watch the new movie The Odyssey by Christopher Nolan if
it is ever released since almost all of it has been filmed in Europe and >Trump wants to impose a 100% tariff on it.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." -William Shatner
The True Doctor wrote:
On 09/05/2025 11:34, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 09/05/2025 09:50, Blueshirt wrote:
Well, viewers are turning away from the likes of
EastEnders too... what did that show do wrong?
Because it's degenerate woke garbage that spreads racism
and hate.
Haven't watched it in years so I'll take your word for it.
Look it up in the papers.
No, I am happy to take your word for it.
All these woke soap-opera writers have been taught
to do is write characters based on their own
personalities, but since they are all sick and disgusting vile
perverts and degenerate racists, sexists, and bigots, that's
all that they can write about. This is why these perverts
virtue signal in order to cover up the disgusting vile
individuals they actually are. Look at RTD who is a sexually
harassing incel so almost every character he writes, such as
Ncuti Gatwa, is a sexually harassing incel
Okay then... you are the expert on that sort of thing so I'm
sure you are correct.
<hums and moves away silently>
The True loon lied:
On 08/05/2025 10:32, Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Moreso RTD for preserving the Timeless Child.
Which the general TV watching public couldn't actually give a
damn about... only a few obsessive types want to keep banging
Wrong! Turning the main protagonist into a genocidal monster that is
running way from its crimes is what drove the general audience away.
Liar! As you’ve been told before, there was nothing in any episode
showing the pre-Hartnell Doctors being genocidal. They did bad
things, yes, but not necessarily genocide. That’s just something you
made up.
--
solar penguin
The True Doctor wrote:
On 09/05/2025 11:34, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 09/05/2025 09:50, Blueshirt wrote:
Well, viewers are turning away from the likes of
EastEnders too... what did that show do wrong?
Because it's degenerate woke garbage that spreads racism
and hate.
Haven't watched it in years so I'll take your word for it.
Look it up in the papers.
No, I am happy to take your word for it.
All these woke soap-opera writers have been taught
to do is write characters based on their own
personalities, but since they are all sick and disgusting vile
perverts and degenerate racists, sexists, and bigots, that's
all that they can write about. This is why these perverts
virtue signal in order to cover up the disgusting vile
individuals they actually are. Look at RTD who is a sexually
harassing incel so almost every character he writes, such as
Ncuti Gatwa, is a sexually harassing incel
Okay then... you are the expert on that sort of thing so I'm
sure you are correct.
<hums and moves away silently>
The True Doctor wrote:
On 08/05/2025 10:32, Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Moreso RTD for preserving the Timeless Child.
Which the general TV watching public couldn't actually give a
damn about... only a few obsessive types want to keep banging
Wrong! Turning the main protagonist into a genocidal monster that is
running way from its crimes is what drove the general audience away.
Liar! As you’ve been told before, there was nothing in any episode
showing the pre-Hartnell Doctors being genocidal. They did bad
things, yes, but not necessarily genocide. That’s just something you
made up.
Jodie Whittaker is shown refusing to open the pocket-watch and
recognise the enormity of the crimes against all lifeforms the
Timeless Child monster either personally carried out, was an
accomplice too, or watch and did nothing to stop.
... This makes the Timeless Child monster no different to
the concentration camp guards at Auschwitz.
If its crimes were trivial what doesn't Whittaker open the
pocket-watch?
If she believes she is not going to turn into a monster, why
doesn't she open the watch?
Why does Whittaker let the two genociders on Ranskoor Av Kolos
go free instead of putting them on trial?
Jodie Whittaker is already a monster and an accomplice to
genocide in her own right, and the Timeless Child monster
embedded within her is the reason for it.
On 09/05/2025 14:18, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
All these woke soap-opera writers have been taught
to do is write characters based on their own
personalities, but since they are all sick and disgusting
vile perverts and degenerate racists, sexists, and bigots,
that's all that they can write about. This is why these
perverts virtue signal in order to cover up the disgusting
vile individuals they actually are. Look at RTD who is a
sexually harassing incel so almost every character he
writes, such as Ncuti Gatwa, is a sexually harassing incel
Okay then... you are the expert on that sort of thing so I'm
sure you are correct.
<hums and moves away silently>
I am not the only expert on the crimes of the woke perverts
running the entertainment industry trying to normalise their
depraved lifestyles.
Let me cite Pope Leo XIV.
On 09/05/2025 15:38, solar imbecile wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 08/05/2025 10:32, Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Moreso RTD for preserving the Timeless Child.
Which the general TV watching public couldn't actually give a
damn about... only a few obsessive types want to keep banging
Wrong! Turning the main protagonist into a genocidal monster that is
running way from its crimes is what drove the general audience away.
Liar! As you’ve been told before, there was nothing in any episode
showing the pre-Hartnell Doctors being genocidal. They did bad
You are the liar. There are no pre-Hartnell Doctors.
Jo Martin is shown running away from her crimes carrying a huge gun and
being captured by the Time Lords.
Jodie Whittaker is shown refusing to open the pocket-watch and recognise
the enormity of the crimes against all lifeforms the Timeless Child
monster either personally carried out, was an accomplice too, or watch
and did nothing to stop. This makes the Timeless Child monster no
different to the concentration camp guards at Auschwitz.
things, yes, but not necessarily genocide. That’s just something youIt was shown that the child abusing murdering bitch Tekteun wanted to
made up.
carry out genocide in the other universe after she had exhausted her >genocidal crimes in this universe and was prepared to exterminate
everyone in this universe in order to get to commit genocide in the
other. She was singled out as a perpetrator of genocides on a universal
lever and the Timeless Child monster was depicted by her as her willing >accomplice.
If its crimes were trivial what doesn't Whittaker open the pocket-watch?
If she believes she is not going to turn into a monster, why doesn't she
open the watch?
Why does Whittaker let the two genociders on Ranskoor Av Kolos go free >instead of putting them on trial?
Jodie Whittaker is already a monster and an accomplice to genocide in
her own right, and the Timeless Child monster embedded within her is the >reason for it.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." -William Shatner
On 09/05/2025 14:18, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 09/05/2025 11:34, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 09/05/2025 09:50, Blueshirt wrote:
Well, viewers are turning away from the likes of
EastEnders too... what did that show do wrong?
Because it's degenerate woke garbage that spreads racism
and hate.
Haven't watched it in years so I'll take your word for it.
Look it up in the papers.
No, I am happy to take your word for it.
All these woke soap-opera writers have been taught
to do is write characters based on their own
personalities, but since they are all sick and disgusting vile
perverts and degenerate racists, sexists, and bigots, that's
all that they can write about. This is why these perverts
virtue signal in order to cover up the disgusting vile
individuals they actually are. Look at RTD who is a sexually
harassing incel so almost every character he writes, such as
Ncuti Gatwa, is a sexually harassing incel
Okay then... you are the expert on that sort of thing so I'm
sure you are correct.
<hums and moves away silently>
I am not the only expert on the crimes of the woke perverts running the >entertainment industry trying to normalise their depraved lifestyles.
Let me cite Pope Leo XIV.
<<In the remarks, of which he also read portions for a video produced by
the Catholic News Service, a news agency owned by the United States >Conference of Catholic Bishops, the cleric blamed mass media for
fostering so much “sympathy for anti-Christian lifestyles choices” that >“when people hear the Christian message it often inevitably seems >ideological and emotionally cruel”.
<<“Catholic pastors who preach against the legalization of abortion or
the redefinition of marriage are portrayed as being ideologically
driven, severe and uncaring,” Prevost added.
<<He went on to complain that “alternative families comprised of
same-sex partners and their adopted children are so benignly and >sympathetically portrayed in television programs and cinema today”.
<<The video illustrated his criticism of the “homosexual lifestyle” and >“same-sex partners and their adopted children” with clips from two US >sitcoms featuring same-sex couples, The New Normal and Modern Family.
<<The cleric also called for a “new evangelization to counter these mass >media-produced distortions of religious and ethical reality”.>>
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/may/09/pope-leo-xiv-lgbtq
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." -William Shatner
The True Doctor wrote:
On 09/05/2025 14:18, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
All these woke soap-opera writers have been taught
to do is write characters based on their own
personalities, but since they are all sick and disgusting
vile perverts and degenerate racists, sexists, and bigots,
that's all that they can write about. This is why these
perverts virtue signal in order to cover up the disgusting
vile individuals they actually are. Look at RTD who is a
sexually harassing incel so almost every character he
writes, such as Ncuti Gatwa, is a sexually harassing incel
Okay then... you are the expert on that sort of thing so I'm
sure you are correct.
<hums and moves away silently>
I am not the only expert on the crimes of the woke perverts
running the entertainment industry trying to normalise their
depraved lifestyles.
Let me cite Pope Leo XIV.
Please don't.
It's bad enough when our resident non-expert on Christianity
does his bible quote thing... we don't need more religious mumbo
jumbo polluting our lovely community, especially when a new
Doctor Who episode drops in the morning. Go to bed early and
prepare accordingly.
The True loon told lots more lies:
On 09/05/2025 15:38, solar imbecile wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 08/05/2025 10:32, Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Moreso RTD for preserving the Timeless Child.
Which the general TV watching public couldn't actually give a
damn about... only a few obsessive types want to keep banging
Wrong! Turning the main protagonist into a genocidal monster that is
running way from its crimes is what drove the general audience away.
Liar! As you’ve been told before, there was nothing in any episode
showing the pre-Hartnell Doctors being genocidal. They did bad
You are the liar. There are no pre-Hartnell Doctors.
There aren’t any post-Hartnell Doctors either. Or any Hartnell Doctors
if it comes to that. It’s all just fiction. None of it is real.
Jo Martin is shown running away from her crimes carrying a huge gun and
being captured by the Time Lords.
Yes, she’s committed crimes, according to Time Lord law. That
doesn’t mean those crimes were genocide. There are other, less
severe, crimes she could’ve committed. Such as interference.
Or do you think the Second Doctor committed genocide in The
War Games?
Jodie Whittaker is shown refusing to open the pocket-watch and recognise
the enormity of the crimes against all lifeforms the Timeless Child
monster either personally carried out, was an accomplice too, or watch
and did nothing to stop. This makes the Timeless Child monster no
different to the concentration camp guards at Auschwitz.
It certainly shows that the Doctor is worried about what she
might’ve done. But as she doesn’t know (and neither do we)
It’s impossible to say if her worries are justified.
It’s odd. For someone who claims to admire ancient philosophers
and right-wing politicians, you haven’t learnt from either Plato
or Donald Rumsfeld the importance of knowing that there are
things that we know we don’t know.
things, yes, but not necessarily genocide. That’s just something youIt was shown that the child abusing murdering bitch Tekteun wanted to
made up.
carry out genocide in the other universe after she had exhausted her
genocidal crimes in this universe and was prepared to exterminate
everyone in this universe in order to get to commit genocide in the
other. She was singled out as a perpetrator of genocides on a universal
lever and the Timeless Child monster was depicted by her as her willing
accomplice.
Liar! The Doctor was not her willing accomplice. She was actually
appalled by what Tecteun was doing.
If its crimes were trivial what doesn't Whittaker open the pocket-watch?
Because Whittaker is just an actress who isn’t even playing the
Doctor any more. And had to follow the script when she was.
Like I told you, it’s not real. Try to remember that.
If she believes she is not going to turn into a monster, why doesn't she
open the watch?
Because she just plain doesn’t know.
But that doesn’t mean she thinks it’ll be genocide. Remember, the >flashback in Once, Upon Time suggested that the Doctor might’ve
been an assassin. That’s bad enough without adding genocide!
Why does Whittaker let the two genociders on Ranskoor Av Kolos go free
instead of putting them on trial?
Because that’s what the script told her to do! Yes, it was a
badly-written script, but that wasn’t Whittaker’s fault. She
didn’t write it.
Jodie Whittaker is already a monster and an accomplice to genocide in
her own right, and the Timeless Child monster embedded within her is the
reason for it.
Liar! Jodie Whittaker is an actress!
If you’re not even going to try to pretend you understand the
difference between reality and fiction, there’s not much
point continuing.
--
solar penguin
On 09/05/2025 15:38, solar imbecile wrote:
Liar! As you’ve been told before, there was nothing in any
episode showing the pre-Hartnell Doctors being genocidal.
They did bad
You are the liar. There are no pre-Hartnell Doctors.
In article <vvlipd$2vg0s$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 09/05/2025 15:38, solar penguin wrote:
Liar! As you’ve been told before, there was nothing in any
episode showing the pre-Hartnell Doctors being genocidal.
You are the liar. There are no pre-Hartnell Doctors.
And THAT is the truth!
In article <xn0p5lcl9ce2spe001@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 09/05/2025 09:50, Blueshirt wrote:
Whatever the story is, the great news is it hasn't stopped
you from watching it, so Doctor Who must still have some
merit to it!
Doctor Who ended in 2017! Nobody actually watches Doctor
Whoke.
Well... you do!
Look at the ratings being flushed down the toilet. 1.5
million so-called viewers is just the people who have their TV
turned on all day tuned into BBC1 what they do something other
than watching it.
Even when people watch it [like you do] you claim nobody is
watching it!!! Yet you and the YouTubers that are always moaning
about Doctor Who still watch the show, so logically people must
be watching it. How can people complain about it if they don't
watch it? So they are not "so called" viewers... however, they
are so called fans!
what about this viewer/listener feedback abut the BBC?
The True Doctor wrote:
On 09/05/2025 15:38, solar imbecile wrote:
Liar! As you’ve been told before, there was nothing in any
episode showing the pre-Hartnell Doctors being genocidal.
They did bad
You are the liar. There are no pre-Hartnell Doctors.
!!! Ha Ha Ha...
Just when you think it's safe to watch Doctor Who again... RTD
throws another curve ball at everyone.
He's definitely determined to go out all guns blazing, with a
big two fingers up at the 'haters'!
The Doctor wrote:
In article <vvlipd$2vg0s$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 09/05/2025 15:38, solar penguin wrote:
Liar! As you’ve been told before, there was nothing in any
episode showing the pre-Hartnell Doctors being genocidal.
You are the liar. There are no pre-Hartnell Doctors.
And THAT is the truth!
Your truth.
If there are no pre-Hartnell Doctors, which is fine if that's
your opinion, then where does Jo Martin's 'Fugitive Doctor'
fit in?
It's a simple question that you as a Doctor Who fan should be
able to answer... you've got your Doctor numbers (1-15) and
names (The War Doctor, etc.) so where is Jo Martin's
incarnation placed? It can't be that hard a question?
On 9/05/2025 11:59 pm, The Doctor wrote:^^^^^<-Paedophile talker noted ^^^^^<-Paedophile talker noted
In article <xn0p5lcl9ce2spe001@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 09/05/2025 09:50, Blueshirt wrote:
<Snip>
"abut"??Whatever the story is, the great news is it hasn't stopped
you from watching it, so Doctor Who must still have some
merit to it!
Doctor Who ended in 2017! Nobody actually watches Doctor
Whoke.
Well... you do!
Look at the ratings being flushed down the toilet. 1.5
million so-called viewers is just the people who have their TV
turned on all day tuned into BBC1 what they do something other
than watching it.
Even when people watch it [like you do] you claim nobody is
watching it!!! Yet you and the YouTubers that are always moaning
about Doctor Who still watch the show, so logically people must
be watching it. How can people complain about it if they don't
watch it? So they are not "so called" viewers... however, they
are so called fans!
what about this viewer/listener feedback abut the BBC?
YOU, Binky, have a direct connection to the BBC. Why don't YOU, Binky,
tells us all about "this viewer/listener feedback abut the BBC".
--
Daniel70
In article <xn0p5moebdpt2i1005@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <vvlipd$2vg0s$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
You are the liar. There are no pre-Hartnell Doctors.
And THAT is the truth!
Your truth.
If there are no pre-Hartnell Doctors, which is fine if that's
your opinion, then where does Jo Martin's 'Fugitive Doctor'
fit in?
Never happened,
It's a simple question that you as a Doctor Who fan should be
able to answer... you've got your Doctor numbers (1-15) and
names (The War Doctor, etc.) so where is Jo Martin's
incarnation placed? It can't be that hard a question?
Clue: Retcon the Timelss Child to restore Doctor Who!
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0p5moebdpt2i1005@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <vvlipd$2vg0s$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
You are the liar. There are no pre-Hartnell Doctors.
And THAT is the truth!
Your truth.
If there are no pre-Hartnell Doctors, which is fine if that's
your opinion, then where does Jo Martin's 'Fugitive Doctor'
fit in?
Never happened,
Are you a blind man?
It's a simple question that you as a Doctor Who fan should be
able to answer... you've got your Doctor numbers (1-15) and
names (The War Doctor, etc.) so where is Jo Martin's
incarnation placed? It can't be that hard a question?
Clue: Retcon the Timelss Child to restore Doctor Who!
From what I see it doesn't look likely to be happening any time
soon...
But how hard is it to answer the question? There is a Fugitive
Doctor in the show, as clearly seen even today, so where, if she
is not pre-Hartnell, does she fit? It's a simple question Dave.
SO where do YOU fit her in? It's only fiction,
I am not asking
you to renounce Christ!
You mate AGA can have a go at the question when he turns up
later too...
In article <xn0p5mzaz777ga002@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0p5moebdpt2i1005@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
If there are no pre-Hartnell Doctors, which is fine if
that's your opinion, then where does Jo Martin's
'Fugitive Doctor' fit in?
Never happened,
Clue: Retcon the Timelss Child to restore Doctor Who!
From what I see it doesn't look likely to be happening any
time soon...
But how hard is it to answer the question? There is a
Fugitive Doctor in the show, as clearly seen even today, so
where, if she is not pre-Hartnell, does she fit? It's a
simple question Dave. SO where do YOU fit her in?
The Timeless Child never happened!
You mate AGA can have a go at the question when he turns up
later too...
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0p5mzaz777ga002@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0p5moebdpt2i1005@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
If there are no pre-Hartnell Doctors, which is fine if
that's your opinion, then where does Jo Martin's
'Fugitive Doctor' fit in?
Never happened,
Clue: Retcon the Timelss Child to restore Doctor Who!
From what I see it doesn't look likely to be happening any
time soon...
But how hard is it to answer the question? There is a
Fugitive Doctor in the show, as clearly seen even today, so
where, if she is not pre-Hartnell, does she fit? It's a
simple question Dave. SO where do YOU fit her in?
The Timeless Child never happened!
That does not answer the question... try again...
On 5/10/2025 10:42, Blueshirt wrote:
You mate AGA can have a go at the question when he turns up
later too...
Have you noticed that AGA keeps telling us that he watches the
show (that he claims doesn't exist), so that we don't have
to....only for him to be the last one here, after we've
already seen it and are talking about it?
On 5/10/2025 10:42, Blueshirt wrote:
You mate AGA can have a go at the question when he turns up
later too...
Have you noticed that AGA keeps telling us that he watches the show
(that he claims doesn't exist), so that we don't have to....only for him
to be the last one here, after we've already seen it and are talking
about it?
--
Intelligence is no guarantee against being dead wrong.
--Carl Sagan
Hornplayer9599 wrote:
On 5/10/2025 10:42, Blueshirt wrote:
You mate AGA can have a go at the question when he turns up
later too...
Have you noticed that AGA keeps telling us that he watches the
show (that he claims doesn't exist), so that we don't have
to....only for him to be the last one here, after we've
already seen it and are talking about it?
After just reading his review of this episode I assume it took
him most of the afternoon to compose it! He is our resident
expert on literature though so he probably had to make sure his
commas were in the right place and tidy up the grammar a bit...
Hornplayer9599 wrote:
On 5/10/2025 10:42, Blueshirt wrote:
You mate AGA can have a go at the question when he turns up
later too...
Have you noticed that AGA keeps telling us that he watches the
show (that he claims doesn't exist), so that we don't have
to....only for him to be the last one here, after we've
already seen it and are talking about it?
After just reading his review of this episode I assume it took
him most of the afternoon to compose it! He is our resident
expert on literature though so he probably had to make sure his
commas were in the right place and tidy up the grammar a bit...
On 5/10/2025 12:52, Blueshirt wrote:
Hornplayer9599 wrote:
On 5/10/2025 10:42, Blueshirt wrote:
You mate AGA can have a go at the question when he turns up
later too...
Have you noticed that AGA keeps telling us that he watches the
show (that he claims doesn't exist), so that we don't have
to....only for him to be the last one here, after we've
already seen it and are talking about it?
After just reading his review of this episode I assume it took
him most of the afternoon to compose it! He is our resident
expert on literature though so he probably had to make sure his
commas were in the right place and tidy up the grammar a bit...
How long does it take him to say how somebody is getting groomed each
week? I would have thought he would have everything setup to be a
Ctrl-V action by now.
--
Intelligence is no guarantee against being dead wrong.
--Carl Sagan
In article <xn0p5mo0ndp9cch001@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 09/05/2025 15:38, solar imbecile wrote:
Liar! As you’ve been told before, there was nothing in any
episode showing the pre-Hartnell Doctors being genocidal.
They did bad
You are the liar. There are no pre-Hartnell Doctors.
!!! Ha Ha Ha...
Just when you think it's safe to watch Doctor Who again... RTD
throws another curve ball at everyone.
He's definitely determined to go out all guns blazing, with a
big two fingers up at the 'haters'!
Maybe RTD haters just like JN-T haters.
On 5/10/2025 12:52, Blueshirt wrote:
Hornplayer9599 wrote:
Have you noticed that AGA keeps telling us that he watches
the show (that he claims doesn't exist), so that we don't
have to....only for him to be the last one here, after
we've already seen it and are talking about it?
After just reading his review of this episode I assume it
took him most of the afternoon to compose it! He is our
resident expert on literature though so he probably had to
make sure his commas were in the right place and tidy up the
grammar a bit...
How long does it take him to say how somebody is getting
groomed each week? I would have thought he would have
everything setup to be a Ctrl-V action by now.
On 11/05/2025 12:58 am, The Doctor wrote:^^^^^<-Paedophile talker noted
In article <xn0p5mo0ndp9cch001@post.eweka.nl>,Come on, Binky, how would 'RTD haters' know they are just like 'JN-T
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 09/05/2025 15:38, solar imbecile wrote:
Liar! As you’ve been told before, there was nothing in any
episode showing the pre-Hartnell Doctors being genocidal.
They did bad
You are the liar. There are no pre-Hartnell Doctors.
!!! Ha Ha Ha...
Just when you think it's safe to watch Doctor Who again... RTD
throws another curve ball at everyone.
He's definitely determined to go out all guns blazing, with a
big two fingers up at the 'haters'!
Maybe RTD haters just like JN-T haters.
haters', Binky??^^^^^<-Paedophile talker noted
Or vice-versa??
--
Daniel70
Hornplayer9599 wrote:
On 5/10/2025 12:52, Blueshirt wrote:
Hornplayer9599 wrote:
Have you noticed that AGA keeps telling us that he watches
the show (that he claims doesn't exist), so that we don't
have to....only for him to be the last one here, after
we've already seen it and are talking about it?
After just reading his review of this episode I assume it
took him most of the afternoon to compose it! He is our
resident expert on literature though so he probably had to
make sure his commas were in the right place and tidy up the
grammar a bit...
How long does it take him to say how somebody is getting
groomed each week? I would have thought he would have
everything setup to be a Ctrl-V action by now.
His reviews are getting longer and longer but generally they
all say the same thing so copy and pasting would be simpler.
We'll have send him a Thesaurus...