• Re: Now LEGO BLOCKS Can Discriminate Over Their Parts?!

    From Adam H. Kerman@21:1/5 to the dog from that film you saw on Sun Feb 9 16:34:16 2025
    XPost: rec.arts, alt.radio.talk

    the dog from that film you saw <dsb@REMOVETHISbtinternet.com> wrote:
    On 09/02/2025 09:30, Ubiquitous wrote:

    Dana Loesch reacts to the London Science Museum saying Lego bricks are anti- >>LGBT because they have 'male and female parts that mate together'.

    https://youtu.be/Bm9KPyHUN8E?si=b92qR8aGBEq3WLqa

    fun story but totally untrue.
    what the guide actually points out is that people refer to bricks as
    male and female, an example of how language reinforces the normality of >hetereosexuality (which i agree is the norm)
    it doesnt criticise lego in any way but why spoil a fun story with facts?

    She's literally reacting to a headline from The Telegraph.

    Here's the article, although it's been updated since Loesch commented on
    it.

    Science Museum in 'bonkers' LGBT Lego warning
    Institution's Seeing Things Queerly tour claims people think the toy
    bricks are 'gendered' and reinforces idea 'heterosexuality is the norm'
    by Craig Simpson
    Arts Editor
    The Telegraph
    06 February 2025 12:20pm GMT https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2025/02/06/lego-can-be-anti-lgbt-says- science-museum/

    The first line of the article

    Lego can be anti-LGBT, the Science Museum has said.

    Yeah, that's LITERALLY criticizing Lego.

    Here's paragraph 2.

    A self-guided museum tour on "stories of queer communities,
    experiences and identities" includes a display of Lego bricks
    alongside a guide stating the plastic blocks may reinforce the
    idea that heterosexuality "is the norm".

    That's literally a criticism of how the pieces are designed to fit
    together, therefore normalizing heterosexuality.

    In a later paragraph,

    No source is provided for the alleged view that people consider
    Lego to be gendered, or that sticking bricks together is called
    "mating".

    None of this is about the use of gendered words in language. It's
    literally about the design of the toy and the action of fitting them
    together, and that the curator made shit up.

    You got this very wrong. Your criticism is off base, and you ruined my
    day by making me defend Ubi.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)