• Can't Blame Trump! All 80 aboard Delta flight survive after jet flips u

    From AI Wallace@21:1/5 to All on Mon Feb 17 19:20:10 2025
    XPost: talk.politics.guns, can.politics, free.tim.walz.deployment.run.run.run.away
    XPost: sac.politics

    Video from the scene shows the Mitsubishi CRJ-900LR upside down on the
    snowy tarmac as emergency workers hose it down.

    WASHINGTON — A Delta Air Lines jet flipped on its roof while landing
    Monday at Toronto’s Pearson Airport, but all 80 people on board survived
    and those hurt had relatively minor injuries, the airport’s chief
    executive said.

    Snow was being blown by winds gusting to 40 mph (65 kph) when the flight
    from Minneapolis carrying 76 passengers and four crew attempted to land
    on a dry runway at around 2:15 p.m. Authorities said the cause of the
    crash remained under investigation.

    Video posted to social media only showed the aftermath with the
    Mitsubishi CRJ-900LR overturned, the fuselage seemingly intact and
    firefighters dousing what was left of the fire as passengers climbed out
    and walked across the tarmac.

    “We are very grateful there was no loss of life and relatively minor injuries,” Deborah Flint, CEO of Greater Toronto Airports Authority,
    told reporters.

    Toronto Pearson Fire Chief Todd Aitken said 18 passengers were taken to
    the hospital. Earlier in the day, Ornge air ambulance said it was
    transporting one pediatric patient to Toronto’s SickKids hospital and
    two injured adults to other hospitals in the city.

    Tower controllers were heard speaking with the crew of a medical
    helicopter that had just left Pearson and was returning to help with the
    crash. The plane came to a rest at the intersection of Runways 23 and
    15L, the controller said. That’s not far from the start of the runway.

    “Just so you’re aware, there’s people outside walking around the
    aircraft there,” a tower controller said.

    “Yeah, we’ve got it. The aircraft is upside down and burning,” the medical helicopter pilot responded.

    According to the Meteorological Service of Canada, the airport was
    experiencing blowing snow and winds of 32 mph (51 kph) gusting to 40 mph
    (65 kph). The temperature was about 16.5 degrees Fahrenheit (minus 8.6
    degrees Celsius).

    “It’s very rare to see something like this,” said John Cox, CEO of aviation safety consulting firm Safety Operating Systems in St.
    Petersburg, Florida. “We’ve seen a couple of cases of takeoffs where airplanes have ended up inverted, but it’s pretty rare.”

    The audio recording from the tower at Toronto Pearson International
    Airport shows the flight was cleared to land at about 2:10 p.m. local
    time. The tower warned the pilots of a possible air flow bump in the
    glide path as the plane came in to land.

    “It sounds to me like a controller trying to be helpful, meaning the
    wind is going to give you a bumpy ride coming down, that you’re going to
    be up and down through the glide path," Cox said.

    Cox, who flew for U.S. Air for 25 years and has worked on National Transportation Safety Board investigations, said the CRJ-900 aircraft is
    a proven aircraft that’s been in service for decades and does a good job
    of handling inclement weather.

    “So it was windy. But the airplanes are designed and certified to handle that," Cox said. "The pilots are trained and experienced to handle that."

    Among the questions that need to be answered, Cox said, was why the
    plane was missing a right wing.

    “If one wing is missing, it’s going to have a tendency to roll over,” he said. “Those are going to be central questions as to what happened to
    the wing and the flight data recorder and cockpit voice recorder. They
    will be found, if not today, tomorrow, and the Transportation Safety
    Board of Canada will read them out and they will have a very good
    understanding of what actually occurred here.”

    The last major crash at Pearson was on Aug. 2, 2005, when an Airbus A340 landing from Paris skidded off the runway and burst into flames amid
    stormy weather. All 309 passengers and crew aboard Air France Flight 358 survived the crash.

    The U.S. Federal Aviation Administration said in a statement that the Transportation Safety Board of Canada would head up the investigation
    and provide any updates. The NTSB in the U.S. said it is leading a team
    to assist in the Canadian investigation.

    This is at least the fourth major aviation mishap in North America in
    the past month. A commercial jetliner and an Army helicopter collided
    near the nation’s capital on Jan. 29, killing 67 people. A medical transportation plane crashed in Philadelphia on Jan. 31, killing the six
    people on board and another person on the ground, and 10 were killed in
    a plane crash in Alaska.

    Ontario’s Premier Doug Ford said on X he is "relieved there are no
    casualties after the incident at Toronto Pearson.” Toronto is the
    capital of Ontario. “Provincial officials are in contact with the
    airport and local authorities and will provide any help that’s needed,” Ford said.

    Delta CEO Ed Bastian said in a statement that “the hearts of the entire global Delta family are with those affected by today’s incident at Toronto-Pearson International Airport.”

    Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz said he has been in touch with Delta about the
    crash.

    Endeavor Air, based in Minneapolis, is a subsidiary of Delta Air Lines
    and the world’s largest operator of CRJ-900 aircraft. The airline
    operates 130 regional jets on 700 daily flights to over 126 cities in
    the U.S., Canada and the Caribbean, according to the company’s website.

    The CRJ-900, a popular regional jet, was developed by Canadian aerospace company Bombardier. It’s in the same family of aircraft as the CRJ-700,
    the type of plane involved in the midair collision near Reagan National
    Airport on Jan. 29.

    https://www.wfaa.com/article/news/nation-world/delta-flight-toronto-airport-incident/507-81c8b0f2-16fa-4371-9ef5-2d9933d96952

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to AI Wallace on Tue Feb 18 08:58:34 2025
    XPost: talk.politics.guns, can.politics, free.tim.walz.deployment.run.run.run.away
    XPost: sac.politics

    On 2025-02-17 19:20, AI Wallace wrote:
    Video from the scene shows the Mitsubishi CRJ-900LR upside down on the
    snowy tarmac as emergency workers hose it down.

    I don't know who is to blame for this crash...

    ...or in fact if anyone is to blame...

    ...but I do know you can't determine blame simply by looking at where an accident happened.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From tye syding@21:1/5 to Alan on Tue Feb 18 13:14:43 2025
    XPost: talk.politics.guns, can.politics, free.tim.walz.deployment.run.run.run.away
    XPost: sac.politics

    On Tue, 18 Feb 2025 08:58:34 -0800
    Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

    you can't determine blame simply by looking at where an
    accident happened


    Of course you can where intense meterological conditions exist,
    especially snowy runways, crosswinds and sudden downdrafts.

    Ya dolthead.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to tye syding on Tue Feb 18 13:20:42 2025
    XPost: talk.politics.guns, can.politics, free.tim.walz.deployment.run.run.run.away
    XPost: sac.politics

    On 2025-02-18 12:14, tye syding wrote:
    On Tue, 18 Feb 2025 08:58:34 -0800
    Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

    you can't determine blame simply by looking at where an
    accident happened


    Of course you can where intense meterological conditions exist,
    especially snowy runways, crosswinds and sudden downdrafts.
    No. That isn't about "where" it happened.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From tye syding@21:1/5 to Alan on Tue Feb 18 14:38:51 2025
    XPost: talk.politics.guns, can.politics, free.tim.walz.deployment.run.run.run.away
    XPost: sac.politics

    On Tue, 18 Feb 2025 13:20:42 -0800
    Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

    On 2025-02-18 12:14, tye syding wrote:
    On Tue, 18 Feb 2025 08:58:34 -0800
    Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

    you can't determine blame simply by looking at where an
    accident happened


    Of course you can where intense meterological conditions exist,
    especially snowy runways, crosswinds and sudden downdrafts.


    No. That isn't about "where" it happened.

    You've lost all your marbles, snow mexican.

    Weather is intensely place-correlated.

    End of story.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to tye syding on Tue Feb 18 15:02:23 2025
    XPost: talk.politics.guns, can.politics, free.tim.walz.deployment.run.run.run.away
    XPost: sac.politics

    On 2025-02-18 13:38, tye syding wrote:
    On Tue, 18 Feb 2025 13:20:42 -0800
    Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

    On 2025-02-18 12:14, tye syding wrote:
    On Tue, 18 Feb 2025 08:58:34 -0800
    Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

    you can't determine blame simply by looking at where an
    accident happened


    Of course you can where intense meterological conditions exist,
    especially snowy runways, crosswinds and sudden downdrafts.


    No. That isn't about "where" it happened.

    You've lost all your marbles, snow mexican.

    Weather is intensely place-correlated.
    Sure... ...but "correlation is not causation".

    Bottom line:

    We don't know why this jet crashed.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From tye syding@21:1/5 to Alan on Tue Feb 18 16:24:45 2025
    XPost: talk.politics.guns, can.politics, sac.politics

    On Tue, 18 Feb 2025 15:02:23 -0800
    Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

    On 2025-02-18 13:38, tye syding wrote:
    On Tue, 18 Feb 2025 13:20:42 -0800
    Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

    On 2025-02-18 12:14, tye syding wrote:
    On Tue, 18 Feb 2025 08:58:34 -0800
    Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

    you can't determine blame simply by looking at where an
    accident happened


    Of course you can where intense meterological conditions exist,
    especially snowy runways, crosswinds and sudden downdrafts.


    No. That isn't about "where" it happened.

    You've lost all your marbles, snow mexican.

    Weather is intensely place-correlated.
    Sure... ...but "correlation is not causation".

    Bad weather was caused by location and atmospheric dynamics.

    Bottom line:

    We don't know why this jet crashed.

    Yet.

    But we can see that video and the right wing catch and know that
    slippery conditions and high crosswinds played a role.

    The NTSB workup will in time explain if the landing gear collapsed or
    there were other factors.

    For now - weather.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Java@21:1/5 to tye syding on Tue Feb 18 22:01:20 2025
    XPost: talk.politics.guns, can.politics, sac.politics

    On 2/18/2025 3:24 PM, tye syding wrote:
    On Tue, 18 Feb 2025 15:02:23 -0800
    Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

    On 2025-02-18 13:38, tye syding wrote:
    On Tue, 18 Feb 2025 13:20:42 -0800
    Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

    On 2025-02-18 12:14, tye syding wrote:
    On Tue, 18 Feb 2025 08:58:34 -0800
    Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

    you can't determine blame simply by looking at where an
    accident happened


    Of course you can where intense meterological conditions exist,
    especially snowy runways, crosswinds and sudden downdrafts.


    No. That isn't about "where" it happened.

    You've lost all your marbles, snow mexican.

    Weather is intensely place-correlated.
    Sure... ...but "correlation is not causation".

    Bad weather was caused by location and atmospheric dynamics.

    Bottom line:

    We don't know why this jet crashed.

    Yet.

    But we can see that video and the right wing catch and know that
    slippery conditions and high crosswinds played a role.

    The NTSB workup will in time explain if the landing gear collapsed or
    there were other factors.

    For now - weather.

    The flight came from Minnesota. Tim Walz probably had a defective
    tampon dispenser installed and it began high-speed dispensing on landing.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to tye syding on Tue Feb 18 22:02:14 2025
    XPost: talk.politics.guns, can.politics, sac.politics

    On 2025-02-18 15:24, tye syding wrote:
    On Tue, 18 Feb 2025 15:02:23 -0800
    Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

    On 2025-02-18 13:38, tye syding wrote:
    On Tue, 18 Feb 2025 13:20:42 -0800
    Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

    On 2025-02-18 12:14, tye syding wrote:
    On Tue, 18 Feb 2025 08:58:34 -0800
    Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

    you can't determine blame simply by looking at where an
    accident happened


    Of course you can where intense meterological conditions exist,
    especially snowy runways, crosswinds and sudden downdrafts.


    No. That isn't about "where" it happened.

    You've lost all your marbles, snow mexican.

    Weather is intensely place-correlated.
    Sure... ...but "correlation is not causation".

    Bad weather was caused by location and atmospheric dynamics.

    Bottom line:

    We don't know why this jet crashed.

    Yet.

    But we can see that video and the right wing catch and know that
    slippery conditions and high crosswinds played a role.

    The NTSB workup will in time explain if the landing gear collapsed or
    there were other factors.

    For now - weather.
    Actually, what was obvious that you've utterly failed to see is that the descent rate was FAR TOO HIGH.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From tye syding@21:1/5 to Java on Wed Feb 19 11:02:08 2025
    XPost: talk.politics.guns, can.politics, sac.politics

    On Tue, 18 Feb 2025 22:01:20 -0800
    Java <java@boner.org> wrote:

    On 2/18/2025 3:24 PM, tye syding wrote:
    On Tue, 18 Feb 2025 15:02:23 -0800
    Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

    On 2025-02-18 13:38, tye syding wrote:
    On Tue, 18 Feb 2025 13:20:42 -0800
    Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

    On 2025-02-18 12:14, tye syding wrote:
    On Tue, 18 Feb 2025 08:58:34 -0800
    Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

    you can't determine blame simply by looking at where an
    accident happened


    Of course you can where intense meterological conditions exist,
    especially snowy runways, crosswinds and sudden downdrafts.


    No. That isn't about "where" it happened.

    You've lost all your marbles, snow mexican.

    Weather is intensely place-correlated.
    Sure... ...but "correlation is not causation".

    Bad weather was caused by location and atmospheric dynamics.

    Bottom line:

    We don't know why this jet crashed.

    Yet.

    But we can see that video and the right wing catch and know that
    slippery conditions and high crosswinds played a role.

    The NTSB workup will in time explain if the landing gear collapsed
    or there were other factors.

    For now - weather.

    The flight came from Minnesota. Tim Walz probably had a defective
    tampon dispenser installed and it began high-speed dispensing on
    landing.


    Ouch!

    And a Somali lezbo as at the yoke.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From tye syding@21:1/5 to Alan on Wed Feb 19 11:03:35 2025
    XPost: talk.politics.guns, can.politics, sac.politics

    On Tue, 18 Feb 2025 22:02:14 -0800
    Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

    On 2025-02-18 15:24, tye syding wrote:
    On Tue, 18 Feb 2025 15:02:23 -0800
    Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

    On 2025-02-18 13:38, tye syding wrote:
    On Tue, 18 Feb 2025 13:20:42 -0800
    Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

    On 2025-02-18 12:14, tye syding wrote:
    On Tue, 18 Feb 2025 08:58:34 -0800
    Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

    you can't determine blame simply by looking at where an
    accident happened


    Of course you can where intense meterological conditions exist,
    especially snowy runways, crosswinds and sudden downdrafts.


    No. That isn't about "where" it happened.

    You've lost all your marbles, snow mexican.

    Weather is intensely place-correlated.
    Sure... ...but "correlation is not causation".

    Bad weather was caused by location and atmospheric dynamics.

    Bottom line:

    We don't know why this jet crashed.

    Yet.

    But we can see that video and the right wing catch and know that
    slippery conditions and high crosswinds played a role.

    The NTSB workup will in time explain if the landing gear collapsed
    or there were other factors.

    For now - weather.
    Actually, what was obvious that you've utterly failed to see is that
    the descent rate was FAR TOO HIGH.

    That came out this morning.

    Could be a microburst, or flaps malfunction, there are no black box
    reading yet, are there?

    Funny thing, as easily as it was to recover.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From tye syding@21:1/5 to Alan on Wed Feb 19 12:40:49 2025
    XPost: talk.politics.guns, can.politics, sac.politics

    On Wed, 19 Feb 2025 11:32:16 -0800
    Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

    On 2025-02-19 10:03, tye syding wrote:
    On Tue, 18 Feb 2025 22:02:14 -0800
    Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

    On 2025-02-18 15:24, tye syding wrote:
    On Tue, 18 Feb 2025 15:02:23 -0800
    Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

    On 2025-02-18 13:38, tye syding wrote:
    On Tue, 18 Feb 2025 13:20:42 -0800
    Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

    On 2025-02-18 12:14, tye syding wrote:
    On Tue, 18 Feb 2025 08:58:34 -0800
    Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

    you can't determine blame simply by looking at where an
    accident happened


    Of course you can where intense meterological conditions
    exist, especially snowy runways, crosswinds and sudden
    downdrafts.


    No. That isn't about "where" it happened.

    You've lost all your marbles, snow mexican.

    Weather is intensely place-correlated.
    Sure... ...but "correlation is not causation".

    Bad weather was caused by location and atmospheric dynamics.

    Bottom line:

    We don't know why this jet crashed.

    Yet.

    But we can see that video and the right wing catch and know that
    slippery conditions and high crosswinds played a role.

    The NTSB workup will in time explain if the landing gear collapsed
    or there were other factors.

    For now - weather.
    Actually, what was obvious that you've utterly failed to see is
    that the descent rate was FAR TOO HIGH.

    That came out this morning.

    Could be a microburst, or flaps malfunction, there are no black box
    reading yet, are there?

    Funny thing, as easily as it was to recover.


    Ah, yes!

    The conspiracy theorist emerges!

    BB data is where?

    Why?

    Uh huh.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to tye syding on Wed Feb 19 11:32:16 2025
    XPost: talk.politics.guns, can.politics, sac.politics

    On 2025-02-19 10:03, tye syding wrote:
    On Tue, 18 Feb 2025 22:02:14 -0800
    Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

    On 2025-02-18 15:24, tye syding wrote:
    On Tue, 18 Feb 2025 15:02:23 -0800
    Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

    On 2025-02-18 13:38, tye syding wrote:
    On Tue, 18 Feb 2025 13:20:42 -0800
    Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

    On 2025-02-18 12:14, tye syding wrote:
    On Tue, 18 Feb 2025 08:58:34 -0800
    Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

    you can't determine blame simply by looking at where an
    accident happened


    Of course you can where intense meterological conditions exist,
    especially snowy runways, crosswinds and sudden downdrafts.


    No. That isn't about "where" it happened.

    You've lost all your marbles, snow mexican.

    Weather is intensely place-correlated.
    Sure... ...but "correlation is not causation".

    Bad weather was caused by location and atmospheric dynamics.

    Bottom line:

    We don't know why this jet crashed.

    Yet.

    But we can see that video and the right wing catch and know that
    slippery conditions and high crosswinds played a role.

    The NTSB workup will in time explain if the landing gear collapsed
    or there were other factors.

    For now - weather.
    Actually, what was obvious that you've utterly failed to see is that
    the descent rate was FAR TOO HIGH.

    That came out this morning.

    Could be a microburst, or flaps malfunction, there are no black box
    reading yet, are there?

    Funny thing, as easily as it was to recover.


    Ah, yes!

    The conspiracy theorist emerges!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to tye syding on Wed Feb 19 11:48:49 2025
    XPost: talk.politics.guns, can.politics, sac.politics

    On 2025-02-19 11:40, tye syding wrote:
    On Wed, 19 Feb 2025 11:32:16 -0800
    Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

    On 2025-02-19 10:03, tye syding wrote:
    On Tue, 18 Feb 2025 22:02:14 -0800
    Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

    On 2025-02-18 15:24, tye syding wrote:
    On Tue, 18 Feb 2025 15:02:23 -0800
    Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

    On 2025-02-18 13:38, tye syding wrote:
    On Tue, 18 Feb 2025 13:20:42 -0800
    Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

    On 2025-02-18 12:14, tye syding wrote:
    On Tue, 18 Feb 2025 08:58:34 -0800
    Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

    you can't determine blame simply by looking at where an
    accident happened


    Of course you can where intense meterological conditions
    exist, especially snowy runways, crosswinds and sudden
    downdrafts.


    No. That isn't about "where" it happened.

    You've lost all your marbles, snow mexican.

    Weather is intensely place-correlated.
    Sure... ...but "correlation is not causation".

    Bad weather was caused by location and atmospheric dynamics.

    Bottom line:

    We don't know why this jet crashed.

    Yet.

    But we can see that video and the right wing catch and know that
    slippery conditions and high crosswinds played a role.

    The NTSB workup will in time explain if the landing gear collapsed
    or there were other factors.

    For now - weather.
    Actually, what was obvious that you've utterly failed to see is
    that the descent rate was FAR TOO HIGH.

    That came out this morning.

    Could be a microburst, or flaps malfunction, there are no black box
    reading yet, are there?

    Funny thing, as easily as it was to recover.


    Ah, yes!

    The conspiracy theorist emerges!

    BB data is where?

    Why?

    Uh huh.
    <https://www.reuters.com/world/americas/delta-air-lines-said-most-passengers-toronto-plane-crash-released-hospital-2025-02-18/>

    'Canadian investigators said on Tuesday they sent black boxes for lab
    analysis from a Delta Air Lines regional jet that flipped upside down
    upon landing in Toronto a day earlier, as they probe causes of the crash
    that injured 21 people.'

    So the plane crashed at 2pm on Monday,

    On Tuesday, the black boxes (flight data recorder and cockpit voice
    recorder) had already been "sent" for analysis.

    Try to keep up, doofus.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From tye syding@21:1/5 to Alan on Wed Feb 19 13:08:19 2025
    XPost: talk.politics.guns, can.politics, sac.politics

    On Wed, 19 Feb 2025 11:48:49 -0800
    Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

    Try to keep up, doofus.


    https://oversight.house.gov/release/hearing-wrap-up-doge-subcommittees-first-hearing-uncovers-billions-lost-to-fraud-and-improper-payments-launches-war-on-waste/

    Hearing Wrap Up: DOGE SubcommitteeΓÇÖs First Hearing Uncovers Billions Lost to Fraud and Improper Payments, Launches ΓÇ£War on WasteΓÇ¥
    WASHINGTONΓÇöThe Subcommittee on Delivering on Government Efficiency (DOGE) held its inaugural hearing today titled ΓÇ£The War on Waste: Stamping Out the Scourge of Improper Payments and FraudΓÇ¥ to investigate the hundreds of billions of taxpayersΓÇÖ
    dollars wasted annually on improper payments and fraud. Expert witnesses shared step-by-step plans to improve payment systems, close loopholes, decrease fraud, and save American taxpayers billions of dollars every year. Members explained how the DOGE
    Subcommittee will aid President Trump and Elon Musk in their efforts to rein in the runaway bureaucracy. Majority members also cited potential legislation that would help facilitate DOGEΓÇÖs efforts to improve payment accuracy and eliminate improper
    payments and fraud across federal agencies. The DOGE SubcommitteeΓÇÖs ΓÇ£War on WasteΓÇ¥ will help ensure Americans see their tax dollars spent efficiently and effectively.

    Key Takeaways:

    The DOGE Subcommittee will actively work with President TrumpΓÇÖs Department of Government Efficiency to root out waste, shore up vulnerable payment systems, and fully investigate schemes to defraud taxpayers.

    Dawn Royal, a certified welfare investigator and the Director of United Council on Welfare Fraud, explained how career bureaucrats, currently facing scrutiny from President Trump and Elon Musk, play down problems in the system in an effort to protect
    their political interests: ΓÇ£Investigators have also found themselves at odds with the career bureaucrats who recite watered down facts about fraud in order to promote their political agendas. Specifically, we can look to the career bureaucrats who have
    historically claimed that the fraud rate in SNAP is less than 1%. The disregard for the value of integrity is evidenced by the less than 1/20 of 1% of the SNAP budget spent on the prevention, detection, and prosecution of fraud…Sadly, it is already
    apparent that career bureaucrats are not being totally transparent as they attempt to protect spending and broken programs.ΓÇ¥
    Rep. Michael Cloud (R-Texas) celebrated the success of President Trump, Elon Musk, and their Department of Government Efficiency in swiftly rooting out government waste and also thanked Subcommittee Chairwoman Greene for her efforts to bring the DOGE
    agenda to Congress: ΓÇ£Thankfully with DOGE, we have a president bringing the leadership needed and a focused effort, along with the talent, technology, tools, and transparency to this waste, fraud and abuse. And to those who would stand opposed to this
    effort, I would just point out, while itΓÇÖs understandable to find waste, fraud and abuse that has grown and metastasized in the government even over decades, certainly accelerated in the last few years, to continue to protect it is corruption. I want
    to thank the Chair for beginning this war on waste on this side of Pennsylvania Avenue and bringing together this Committee. This effort is so important as we work to relieve the American people of this burden of waste, fraud and abuse.ΓÇ¥
    Fraud and abuse of federal taxpayer dollars can be curbed dramatically by closing eligibility loopholes, improving identity verification, and refining payment tracking mechanisms at both the federal and state level.

    Haywood Talcove, the Chief Executive Officer of LexisNexis Risk Solutions for Government, laid out a three-step plan for reclaiming control of federal payment systems: ΓÇ£ThereΓÇÖs no excuse for the government to lag if we do the following. Number one,
    implement identity verification on the front end. Criminals should never receive a dime. Eliminate self-certification. No more honor system for billion-dollar programs. And continuous auditing. Keep verifying because criminals never stop adapting.ΓÇ¥
    Ms. Royal detailed commonsense solutions to closing loopholes, improving technology, and reducing fraud across all payment systems: ΓÇ£There are things this Committee can do to help the investigators fighting the war on fraud. Number one, eliminate self-
    attestation in the application process for all programs. Number two, funding for technology that includes identity verification tools that will help prevent fraud. The current pay and chase model is not sustainable. Number three, immediately implement
    the National Accuracy Clearinghouse, the NAC will provide data to states to prevent duplicate participation in all of the social welfare programs. And four, allocate direct funding with mandates restricting the use of the funding to the prevention,
    detection, and prosecution of fraud.ΓÇ¥
    The Biden-Harris Administration exacerbated an already massive improper payment problem by expanding faulty welfare programs without proper oversight mechanisms in place and by failing to hold AmericaΓÇÖs bureaucracy accountable.

    Stewart Whitson, the Senior Director of Federal Affairs at the Foundation for Government Accountability, described how policies pushed by the Biden Administration exacted a cost on Americans: ΓÇ£Congress can strengthen the Medicaid program through
    legislative action. That would include repealing Biden’s disastrous Medicaid streamlining rule, which ties the hands of states trying to remove ineligible release….Congress can help President Trump’s DOJ’s effort by ensuring that entrenched
    partisan bureaucrats donΓÇÖt stand in the way of reform so much as DOJΓÇÖs team of 30 found hundreds of billions of dollars funneled into wasteful, fraudulent and flat-out insane projects. But theyΓÇÖve only scratched the surface if this much fraud has
    been exposed in just a few weeks. Imagine what else is buried under layers of red tape and government excuses.ΓÇ¥
    Rep. William Timmons (R-S.C.) slammed former President Joe Biden for abusing federal payment systems and contributing to the dangerously high national debt: ΓÇ£Joe Biden signed his name and wanted the American people to believe he had the ability to
    forgive $250 billion with a signature. Guess what? The Supreme Court ruled he did not. ThatΓÇÖs our system of checks and balances. The President, Biden, he clearly was experiencing cognitive decline. He didnΓÇÖt even have the ability to be charged with a
    crime as determined by his own Department of Justice. But he signs his name, and he thinks it gives a quarter of trillion dollars away, redistributes taxpayer dollars. ItΓÇÖs just crazy that we canΓÇÖt come together to address the greatest national
    security threat facing this country, our debt.ΓÇ¥
    Member Highlights:

    DOGE Subcommittee Chairwoman Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) shed light on a striking disparity in fraud rates between the public and private sectors, noting that while private sector businesses experience fraud at a rate of around 3 percent, the federal
    governmentΓÇÖs fraud rate is about 20 percent.



    Subcommittee Chairwoman Greene: ΓÇ£Mr. Talcove, do private sector companies have a lower rate of improper payments than the federal government?ΓÇ¥

    Mr. Talcove: ΓÇ£Yes. The fraud rate, that the criminals are taking advantage of the public sector is around 20%. In the private sector, itΓÇÖs around 3%. And itΓÇÖs really because the tools that are used in the private sector, arenΓÇÖt used in the public
    sector. Front end identity verification, self-certification, and then finally, making sure that individuals are who they say they are. If we start using these tools, you will see the fraud rate go down dramatically because for the most part, this fraud
    isnΓÇÖt taking place by individuals. ItΓÇÖs individuals whose identities have been stolen on the dark web.ΓÇ¥

    Subcommittee Chairwoman Greene: ΓÇ£We would say the private companies that pretty much have to exist on a 20% profit rate. They canΓÇÖt continue to be successful if they were to allow their customers data to be something like that and used by criminals.
    However, the federal government, who can continue printing checks and continue an operation, never fixes its problems because it canΓÇÖt be forced to go out of business. Would you agree with that, Yes or no?ΓÇ¥

    Mr. Talcove: ΓÇ£Yes.ΓÇ¥

    Rep. Tim Burchett (R-Tenn.) blasted DOGE Subcommittee Democrats for defending schemes to defraud American taxpayers. He also pointed out that self-verification systems at local doctorsΓÇÖ offices are more secure than federal payment systems.



    Rep. Burchett: ΓÇ£The gravy train for a lot of these folks, itΓÇÖs been on biscuit wheels. ItΓÇÖs about to run off the dadgum tracks. ItΓÇÖs about done. Could you imagine standing up here and defending waste, fraud, and abuse? But I think thatΓÇÖs what
    weΓÇÖre seeing. When people squeal and donΓÇÖt ask questions, I think it shows the American public what the heckΓÇÖs going on and that little gravy train is getting ready to run out. The spigot is getting ready to be turned off.ΓÇ¥

    …

    Mr. Whitson: ΓÇ£Rather than accepting self-attestation, states should have to be required to actually verify peopleΓÇÖs identities and, hereΓÇÖs the key part, before they get enrolled. They shouldnΓÇÖt get enrolled and then eventually come later on down
    the road.ΓÇ¥

    Rep. Burchett: ΓÇ£Including at a doctorΓÇÖs appointment back in Knoxville, and the verification process is very extensive. ItΓÇÖs more so than the federal government requires for any of this.ΓÇ¥

    Rep. Eric Burlison (R-Mo.) detailed how the Department of Government Efficiency is well-positioned within the Executive Office of the President to ensure federal payment systems are protected from future abuses.



    Rep. Burlison: ΓÇ£Mr. Whitson, the formation of agencies, via the executive action, is not new. Right? The formation of DOGE is not new. Are you familiar with any other previous presidencies where they formed organizations like DOGE via executive action?Γ
    ǥ

    Mr. Whitson: ΓÇ£Yes. So actually the agency that DOGE is occupying is one that was created in a previous administration. So it is something that happens routinely.ΓÇ¥

    Rep. Burlison: ΓÇ£Yeah, the Office of Management and Budget was created, Environment Protection Agency was created, the US Digital Service, which is now DOGE, was created, all by executive order.ΓÇ¥

    Rep. Brian Jack (R-Ga.) described technological inefficiencies, established by the 1974 Privacy Act, that must be updated to allow federal payment systems to use AI and other cutting-edge technologies to reduce improper payments.



    Rep. Jack: ΓÇ£One of the things that I found very interesting from your opening testimony is you talked, and I think you engaged with Mr. Burchett, on the 1974 Privacy Act. And I had some interesting folks visit my office yesterday who noted that one
    third of all prior authorizations are still done manually by phone, fax, or direct post mail. I would love your comments on that. And IΓÇÖd also like you to expand upon some of the solutions that we can deliver to this Congress in modernizing the 1974
    Privacy Act.ΓÇ¥

    Mr. Talcove: ΓÇ£These arenΓÇÖt people problems. These are technology problems. You canΓÇÖt process the number of individuals that are accessing our systems person by person. It just takes too much time. So, by updating the 1974 Privacy Act and allowing
    for digital matching, you would very quickly realize that a large portion of the PPP loan funds were going to the wrong person. You would have been quickly able to match, I think the number was 20%, and were on the do not pay list. You canΓÇÖt expect
    people to do what a machine and especially AI can do today.ΓÇ¥

    Rep. Brandon Gill (R-Texas) held the Biden Administration accountable for aiding abuses of taxpayer dollars and weaponizing the administrative state against the American people.



    Rep. Gill: ΓÇ£The Democrat Party has for decades systematically grown and weaponized the administrative state against the American people. And the American people have had enough of it. Right now, weΓÇÖre talking about $2.7 trillion in improper payments
    since 2003. We are uncovering what could be the biggest money laundering scandal in American history and the other side of the aisle could care less. They have no concern about where this money went to, what entities it went to, what government, and what
    people or groups. Nothing…So it does make me wonder if they don’t care about where it’s going, do they have no idea?

    ΓÇ£Because what weΓÇÖve uncovered so far is that so much of the waste, fraud, and abuse of our federal government is actually funding their side of the aisle. ItΓÇÖs funding media outlets that are running cover for Democrats routinely, NPR, PBS, BBC,
    Politico. ItΓÇÖs going to fund left wing NGOs that are facilitating the invasion of our country. It is going to fund left wing transgender activism and sex changes all over the globe. This is money thatΓÇÖs being used, taken from the American people and
    used against their interests. If you care about rooting out waste, fraud, and abuse, we should be serious about this.ΓÇ¥

    ###

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)