Sysop: | Amessyroom |
---|---|
Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
Users: | 26 |
Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
Uptime: | 00:25:27 |
Calls: | 483 |
Calls today: | 1 |
Files: | 1,073 |
Messages: | 97,784 |
Why did the chicken join a band?
Because .............
Why do fish always know what’s up?
How do you make a cat go “woof”?
On 6/28/2025 10:27 PM, HenHanna wrote:
Why did the chicken join a band?
Because .............
Because he thought he could pullet off.
Why do fish always know what’s up?
They know everything about escalation.
How do you make a cat go “woof”?
You give it a hiss-terectomy.
On 6/28/2025 10:27 PM, HenHanna wrote:
Why did the chicken join a band?
Because .............
Because he thought he could pullet off.
Why do fish always know what’s up?
They know everything about escalation.
How do you make a cat go “woof”?
You give it a hiss-terectomy.
--
Cows apparently produce more milk if the farmer talks to them.
They say it's "In one ear and out the udder."
--
Cows apparently produce more milk if the farmer talks to them.
They say it's "In one ear and out the udder."
On 6/28/2025 11:27 PM, HenHanna wrote:
--
Cows apparently produce more milk if the farmer talks to them.
They say it's "In one ear and out the udder."
I read something similar many years ago about human (expectant) mothers.
If they had encouraging conversations and companionship, they produced
more milk along with a better supply of hormones and other components of healthy and necessary body chemistry. It also seems that many
publications claim something similar for plants. All joking aside, I am curious what/which of these stories are backed up by testable evidence.*
* Several years ago, the TV program MYTH BUSTERS tested plants and they
did not seem to respond. Other than that, is there any evidence for any
of this family of myths?
Jeff Barnett wrote:
On 6/28/2025 11:27 PM, HenHanna wrote:
--
Cows apparently produce more milk if the farmer talks to them.
They say it's "In one ear and out the udder."
I read something similar many years ago about human (expectant) mothers.
If they had encouraging conversations and companionship, they produced
more milk along with a better supply of hormones and other components of
healthy and necessary body chemistry. It also seems that many
publications claim something similar for plants. All joking aside, I am
curious what/which of these stories are backed up by testable evidence.*
* Several years ago, the TV program MYTH BUSTERS tested plants and they
did not seem to respond. Other than that, is there any evidence for any
of this family of myths?
Is this it?
https://mythresults.com/episode23
Talking helps plants grow.
PLAUSIBLE
Seven small greenhouses were set up on the M5
Industries roof. Four were set up with stereos
playing endlessly looping recordings (as having
the MythBusters actually talk to the plants could
contaminate the samples with their expelled carbon
dioxide): Two of negative speech, two of positive
speech (Kari and Scottie each made one positive
and one negative soundtrack), a fifth with
classical music and a sixth with intense death
metal music. A seventh greenhouse, used as a
control sample, had no stereo. The greenhouses with
the recordings of speech grew better than the
control, regardless of whether such talk was kind
or angry. The plants in the greenhouse with the
recording of classical music grew better, while the
plants in the greenhouse with the recording of
intense death metal grew best of all.