• Repeated digits in Pi -- the Feynman point

    From HenHanna@21:1/5 to All on Sun Jun 22 19:15:32 2025
    XPost: sci.lang, sci.math

    Yes, Richard Feynman and Raymond Smullyan were childhood
    friends. Both were born and raised in Far Rockaway, Queens, New York,
    and attended grade school together in the same neighborhood.
    Smullyan specifically mentions that he was a grade school
    classmate of Feynman. Their shared early environment in Far Rockaway is frequently noted in biographical accounts of both figures.


    ______________________________



    The Feynman point refers to the sequence of six consecutive
    nines (999999) that appears in the decimal expansion of pi (π), starting
    at the 762nd digit after the decimal point. This point is notable
    because such a long run of identical digits is statistically rare so
    early in the sequence, leading to its fame as a mathematical curiosity.

    The name honors physicist Richard Feynman, who is said to have
    joked about memorizing pi up to that point and then mischievously
    claiming pi is rational by reciting the six nines and saying "and so
    on". However, there is no clear record of Feynman actually making this
    remark in a lecture, and the story has become part of mathematical
    folklore.

    ___________________________________________

    The remarkable repetition at digit #763 is called the Feynman
    point.


    Skipping 2 times...
    (skipping 4 repeats, and 5 repeats)
    doesn't seem all that remarkable.


    _______________________________________________
    Repeated digits in pi
    Walter Nissen
    Dec 5, 1995


    Since my last post, I have learned a bit about this problem, but very
    little. I thank each of the respondents for their help. This is what I
    know. 3 is the first single digit in pi. 33 is the first doubled digit.
    111 is the first tripled digit. From searches at Jeremy Gilbert's Web
    page, http://gryphon.ccs.brandeis.edu/~grath/attractions/gpi/index.html,
    I
    derive this table:

    digits digit #
    3 1
    33 25
    111 154
    999999 763
    3333333 710101

    http://cad.ucla.edu:8001/amiinpi confirms the first part of this.

    The remarkable repetition at digit #763 is called the Feynman point.

    Perhaps because the late, great Richard P. Feynman called attention to
    it??

    I would welcome any information about extension of this table,
    especially
    resources on the Net. What I have so far seems pitiful compared to the
    4G
    computed digits.

    Thanks.

    Cheers.

    Walter Nissen dk...@cleveland.freenet.edu

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From David Entwistle@21:1/5 to HenHanna on Mon Jun 23 16:14:19 2025
    On Sun, 22 Jun 2025 19:15:32 +0000, HenHanna wrote:

    The Feynman point refers to the sequence of six consecutive
    nines (999999) that appears in the decimal expansion of pi (π), starting
    at the 762nd digit after the decimal point. This point is notable
    because such a long run of identical digits is statistically rare so
    early in the sequence, leading to its fame as a mathematical curiosity.


    I didn't immediately see anything surprising about the six consecutive
    nines, but I've thought about it...

    If the following isn't right, could you put me straight?

    With a number system including ten single-digit integers, zero to nine,
    for a base ten number system, if the sequence of numbers is random (which
    pi isn't), then there is a one in ten probability that any given digit
    will be followed by the same digit. There is a nine tenths probability
    that the subsequent digit will be different. The probability of three
    identical digits is one in ten multiplied by by one in ten, or a
    probability of one in one hundred of three identical digits following each other. If the sequence of identical digits is n digits long, then the probability of it happening in a random sequence of digits is one in
    10^(n-1).

    So, the probability of six nines occurring together, in a random sequence, would be one in one hundred thousand. If 999999 occurs after the 762nd
    digit after the decimal point of pi, I now recognize that is surprising.

    Thanks I feel better for that.
    --
    David Entwistle

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From HenHanna@21:1/5 to David Entwistle on Mon Jun 23 19:58:59 2025
    On Mon, 23 Jun 2025 16:14:19 +0000, David Entwistle wrote:

    On Sun, 22 Jun 2025 19:15:32 +0000, HenHanna wrote:

    The Feynman point refers to the sequence of six consecutive
    nines (999999) that appears in the decimal expansion of pi (π), starting
    at the 762nd digit after the decimal point. This point is notable
    because such a long run of identical digits is statistically rare so
    early in the sequence, leading to its fame as a mathematical curiosity.


    I didn't immediately see anything surprising about the six consecutive
    nines, but I've thought about it...

    If the following isn't right, could you put me straight?


    I hope you don't mean ME...



    With a number system including ten single-digit integers, zero to nine,
    for a base ten number system, if the sequence of numbers is random
    (which
    pi isn't),


    Really? i thought Pi was random.


    then there is a one in ten probability that any given digit
    will be followed by the same digit. There is a nine tenths probability
    that the subsequent digit will be different. The probability of three identical digits is one in ten multiplied by by one in ten, or a
    probability of one in one hundred of three identical digits following
    each
    other. If the sequence of identical digits is n digits long, then the probability of it happening in a random sequence of digits is one in 10^(n-1).

    So, the probability of six nines occurring together, in a random
    sequence,
    would be one in one hundred thousand. If 999999 occurs after the 762nd
    digit after the decimal point of pi, I now recognize that is surprising.

    Thanks I feel better for that.



    _______________________

    Almost every day.... i get briefed from my fav AI.


    I just got tutored by AI on the following....


    When flipping a fair coin repeatedly, the expected number of tosses
    needed to see 6 consecutive heads is: Expected tosses = 126



    When randomly selecting digits from 0 to 9, the expected number of
    digits you need to draw before seeing 6 consecutive 9’s is:
    Expected digits = 1,111,110



    So how unusual or UNexpected is that?
    (the Actual Feynmann point )

    Is that the T-test? p-value? I'll ask my AI maybe tomorrow.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Richard Tobin@21:1/5 to qnivq.ragjvfgyr@ogvagrearg.pbz on Mon Jun 23 20:47:35 2025
    In article <103bugr$1bnfr$2@dont-email.me>,
    David Entwistle <qnivq.ragjvfgyr@ogvagrearg.pbz> wrote:
    So, the probability of six nines occurring together, in a random sequence, >would be one in one hundred thousand. If 999999 occurs after the 762nd
    digit after the decimal point of pi, I now recognize that is surprising.

    There's a run of 11 9s starting at the 27,014,073,304th decimal place.

    There's a run of 17 equal digits starting at the 28,642,224,609,576th
    decimal place, but I don't know what digit it is. It comes before any
    runs of exactly 15 or 16.

    See https://oeis.org/A049522 (the numbers there are counted from the
    initial 3).

    -- Richard

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From David Entwistle@21:1/5 to HenHanna on Tue Jun 24 07:32:15 2025
    On Sun, 22 Jun 2025 19:15:32 +0000, HenHanna wrote:

    The name honors physicist Richard Feynman, who is said to have joked about memorizing pi up to that point and then mischievously
    claiming pi is rational by reciting the six nines and saying "and so
    on". However, there is no clear record of Feynman actually making this
    remark in a lecture, and the story has become part of mathematical
    folklore.

    Chat GPT kindly wrote a short poem to help me remember the first ten
    digits of pi.

    Counting All Digits,
    Aiming Every Intention,
    Boldly Facing Every Dream.

    Can anyone do better?

    --
    David Entwistle

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From David Entwistle@21:1/5 to HenHanna on Tue Jun 24 07:29:02 2025
    On Mon, 23 Jun 2025 19:58:59 +0000, HenHanna wrote:

    Really? i thought Pi was random.

    It may look somewhat random, but no. There's a method that allows the calculation of any digit of pi, in isolation of all the other digits.

    <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
    Bailey%E2%80%93Borwein%E2%80%93Plouffe_formula>

    I haven't looked in detail, but it looks interesting.

    --
    David Entwistle

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Richard Tobin@21:1/5 to HenHanna@dev.null on Tue Jun 24 09:04:00 2025
    In article <1f87e271f28067836cabd2199a7ea473@www.novabbs.com>,
    HenHanna <HenHanna@dev.null> wrote:

    Really? i thought Pi was random.

    What would it mean for a number to be random? A random process
    producing decimal digits is just as likely to produce 1.1111...
    as pi.

    It's not even known if the digits of pi are uniformly distributed.

    -- Richard

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Richard Heathfield@21:1/5 to Richard Tobin on Tue Jun 24 16:01:14 2025
    On 24/06/2025 10:04, Richard Tobin wrote:
    In article <1f87e271f28067836cabd2199a7ea473@www.novabbs.com>,
    HenHanna <HenHanna@dev.null> wrote:

    Really? i thought Pi was random.

    What would it mean for a number to be random?

    Precisely. Surely it depends at least partly on who's doing the
    asking?

    I invented a rather fun way of determining how random pi is.

    Using the digits of pi as a PRNG, I tossed a load of virtual
    needles at a virtual zebra crossing (pseudo-random X for one
    endpoint, pseudorandom angle in radians) a la Buffon's needle.
    Using p = 2l/tπ and therefore π = 2l/pt, I calculated that π is
    about 3, which sounds pretty random to me.

    People only say it /isn't/ random because they've seen it before.
    If you film a kaleidoscope, the pictures are /not/ random because
    you know exactly which frame comes next.


    --
    Richard Heathfield
    Email: rjh at cpax dot org dot uk
    "Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29 July 1999
    Sig line 4 vacant - apply within

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Carl G.@21:1/5 to David Entwistle on Tue Jun 24 19:11:46 2025
    On 6/24/2025 12:32 AM, David Entwistle wrote:
    On Sun, 22 Jun 2025 19:15:32 +0000, HenHanna wrote:

    The name honors physicist Richard Feynman, who is said to have
    joked about memorizing pi up to that point and then mischievously
    claiming pi is rational by reciting the six nines and saying "and so
    on". However, there is no clear record of Feynman actually making this
    remark in a lecture, and the story has become part of mathematical
    folklore.

    Chat GPT kindly wrote a short poem to help me remember the first ten
    digits of pi.

    Counting All Digits,
    Aiming Every Intention,
    Boldly Facing Every Dream.

    Can anyone do better?

    I'm impressed that the ChatGPI understood what you wanted (A=1, B=2,
    C=3, etc.).

    In 1998 I posted the following to the rec.puzzles newsgroup. It used
    the letters in each word for digits of pi:

    =====
    Hey! I made a short paragraph to assist those who often memorize
    something through mnemonics. Try to add comments. When making it
    longer, make all the comments fit my pattern.

    3.14159265358979323846264338327941971693993751...
    Carl G.
    ======
    --
    Carl G.


    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software.
    www.avg.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mike Terry@21:1/5 to Carl G. on Wed Jun 25 04:38:53 2025
    On 25/06/2025 03:11, Carl G. wrote:
    On 6/24/2025 12:32 AM, David Entwistle wrote:
    On Sun, 22 Jun 2025 19:15:32 +0000, HenHanna wrote:

    áááááááááá The name honors physicist Richard Feynman, who is said to have >>> joked about memorizing pi up to that point and then mischievously
    claiming pi is rational by reciting the six nines and saying "and so
    on". However, there is no clear record of Feynman actually making this
    remark in a lecture, and the story has become part of mathematical
    folklore.

    Chat GPT kindly wrote a short poem to help me remember the first ten
    digits of pi.

    Counting All Digits,
    Aiming Every Intention,
    Boldly Facing Every Dream.

    Can anyone do better?

    I'm impressed that the ChatGPI understood what you wanted (A=1, B=2, C=3, etc.).

    In 1998 I posted the following to the rec.puzzles newsgroup.á It used the letters in each word for
    digits of pi:

    =====
    Hey!á I made a short paragraph to assist those who often memorize something through mnemonics. Try
    to add comments.á When making it longer, make all the comments fit my pattern.

    3.14159265358979323846264338327941971693993751...

    Hehe, there's a theory that Pi is any number starting 3.1415926...

    Mike.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From David Entwistle@21:1/5 to Carl G. on Thu Jun 26 19:06:34 2025
    On Tue, 24 Jun 2025 19:11:46 -0700, Carl G. wrote:

    3.14159265358979323846264338327941971693993751...
    3.14159265358979323846264338327950288419716939...

    Oh, who decides?

    The second numbers are from: https://www.piday.org/million/

    I've just ordered the book "Pi Unleashed", but I won't have that for a few days.

    --
    David Entwistle

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Richard Tobin@21:1/5 to qnivq.ragjvfgyr@ogvagrearg.pbz on Thu Jun 26 19:50:14 2025
    In article <103k5nq$3ju79$1@dont-email.me>,
    David Entwistle <qnivq.ragjvfgyr@ogvagrearg.pbz> wrote:

    3.14159 26535 89793 23846 26433 83279 41971 69399 3751...
    3.14159 26535 89793 23846 26433 83279 50288 41971 6939...

    (reformatted)

    Presumably the first was copied from a listing in groups of 5 digits,
    and one group was missed out.

    Oh, who decides?

    A substantial proportion of the population are capable of learning the necessary maths and writing a program to determine which is correct.
    A much smaller proportion are sufficiently motivated to do so.

    If you don't trust the computer, it would be possible to use the
    formula

    pi = 16 atan(1/5) = 4 atan(1/239)

    to calculate it by hand to that precision. William Shanks used it and
    obtained 527 decimal places correctly in 1853. This was not surpassed
    (and an error found in his later digits) until 1946 using a mechanical calculator.

    -- Richard

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From David Entwistle@21:1/5 to Richard Tobin on Fri Jun 27 13:18:25 2025
    On Thu, 26 Jun 2025 19:50:14 -0000 (UTC), Richard Tobin wrote:

    3.14159 26535 89793 23846 26433 83279 41971 69399 3751...
    3.14159 26535 89793 23846 26433 83279 50288 41971 6939...

    (reformatted)

    Presumably the first was copied from a listing in groups of 5 digits,
    and one group was missed out.

    Ah yes, thanks.

    The omission of the five digit sequence avoids the problem of the zero in
    the thirty-second decimal place of Pi. That would be frustrating after
    you'd managed to get that far matching words of equal length to the
    digits.

    I have the same problem with my allocation of A to 1, etc. Looks like I
    need a re-think for a memory aid..

    --
    David Entwistle

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Carl G.@21:1/5 to David Entwistle on Fri Jun 27 12:57:03 2025
    On 6/27/2025 6:18 AM, David Entwistle wrote:
    On Thu, 26 Jun 2025 19:50:14 -0000 (UTC), Richard Tobin wrote:

    3.14159 26535 89793 23846 26433 83279 41971 69399 3751...
    3.14159 26535 89793 23846 26433 83279 50288 41971 6939...

    (reformatted)

    Presumably the first was copied from a listing in groups of 5 digits,
    and one group was missed out.

    Ah yes, thanks.

    The omission of the five digit sequence avoids the problem of the zero in
    the thirty-second decimal place of Pi. That would be frustrating after
    you'd managed to get that far matching words of equal length to the
    digits.

    I have the same problem with my allocation of A to 1, etc. Looks like I
    need a re-think for a memory aid..

    I likely left out the 5-digit block with the zero due to a cut-and-paste
    error. I know that I didn't enter the digits from memory. I had only memorized about 10 digits (the number of digits in a 1970s pocket
    calculator).

    When first posted in 1998, it was suggested that a 10-letter word could
    be used for zero.
    --
    Carl G.


    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software.
    www.avg.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From David Entwistle@21:1/5 to Carl G. on Sat Jun 28 09:57:37 2025
    On Fri, 27 Jun 2025 12:57:03 -0700, Carl G. wrote:

    I likely left out the 5-digit block with the zero due to a cut-and-paste error. I know that I didn't enter the digits from memory. I had only memorized about 10 digits (the number of digits in a 1970s pocket calculator).

    It can't have been easy finding that many digits of pi back then. I'd have
    been learning to program in FORTRAN and carrying piles of punch cards up
    to the seventh(?) floor of the Maths's Building, where the card reader and
    line printer, for the Oxford Road computing centre were.


    When first posted in 1998, it was suggested that a 10-letter word could
    be used for zero.

    Good idea. That would work.


    --
    David Entwistle

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From David Entwistle@21:1/5 to Richard Tobin on Sat Jun 28 10:08:00 2025
    On Thu, 26 Jun 2025 19:50:14 -0000 (UTC), Richard Tobin wrote:

    A substantial proportion of the population are capable of learning the necessary maths and writing a program to determine which is correct. A
    much smaller proportion are sufficiently motivated to do so.

    I've put together a short program to calculate the proportion of an
    arbitrary grid of (x, y) points that lie within a given distance of the
    origin and thereby calculate pi. It surely isn't efficient but seems
    intuitive to me to do it that way and so easy enough to do. Before it runs
    into overflow-errors, it comes up with:

    3.141592653589766 < pi < 3.1415926575897664

    It'll be interesting to see on the various methods suggested in "pi
    Unleashed".

    --
    David Entwistle

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)