Sysop: | Amessyroom |
---|---|
Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
Users: | 43 |
Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
Uptime: | 100:16:13 |
Calls: | 290 |
Files: | 905 |
Messages: | 76,507 |
On 12/24/2024 4:23 PM, cyclintom wrote:saying that Watergate which wasn't an important event was their plan.
I looked through the records and Colonel Oliver North never worked for President Nixon. But I could not discover who his actuaol military aedvisor was and none of the names on his security council rang any bells. But I distinctly remember someone
hunted down and imprisoned dozens of people that followed FBI agents into the Congressioanl buildings. The FBI has pictures of people who were directing the crowd into the halls of congress but somehow they can discover the identity of someone whoThe Democrat Party used election fraud to put Joe Biden into office, the FBI under the control of the Democrat Party (and probably the CIA who are really villains of the first order) planned and caused the "insurrection" of January 6th. They then
tiny percentage. Though he will have a hard time with that because Gavin Loathsome is now doing everything he can to loose the next election in California. Newsom has set up a $20 Million fund to "fight Trump". This will ALL go to his law firm buddiesNow compare this to Watergate which was nothing more than looking for notes that explained the intended election strategy of the Democrat Party.
Trump won because people in this country want to vomit when they read the Slime Stream Media or people like Flunky who makes Francis the Talking Mule seem like a genius.
If you think that the Republican's won this time, all Trump has to do is deport a significant number of illegal gang members to have over 400 electoral votes next time in J.D. Vance's pockets. No doubt Krygowski will call an overwhelming defeat a
streets. Smash and grab is now so comon in San Francisco that all of the major stores have shut down. Drug use among the homeless is almost 100% and riding through Oakland I watched an addict shooting up heroin while sitting on the steps of City Hall. IThis Democrat Governor has decided to lower the income level for which people in California pay income taxes. He has said that California is a safe state for illegals while DA's and Judges in California are releasing cold blooded murderers out on the
I don't believe that California has honest elections. What sort of mother would wish these conditions on her children and yet the majority of coastal city Democrat votes are women.
Thank you.
You may have meant Gen Alexander Haig.
--
Andrew Muzi
am@yellowjersey.org
Open every day since 1 April, 1971
On Wed, 25 Dec 2024 17:34:13 GMT, cyclintom <cyclintom@yahoo.com>
wrote:
This morning I noticed that it wasn't Rand Paul but Ron Paul. Easy enough mistake to make but somehow Liebermann failed to notice it since it was opposite his woke agenda.
I don't recall ever mentioning Rand Paul (or Ron Paul). Go back to
sleep. You appear to still be dreaming.
I woke up this morning rather late and watched some YouTube videos. Is
that the woke agenda? It doesn't seem to match the Wikipedia
definition.
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Woke>
Oh, I see. You're still dreaming.
This morning I noticed that it wasn't Rand Paul but Ron Paul. Easy enough mistake to make but somehow Liebermann failed to notice it since it was opposite his woke agenda.
On Wed, 25 Dec 2024 17:34:13 GMT, cyclintom <cyclintom@yahoo.com>
wrote:
This morning I noticed that it wasn't Rand Paul but Ron Paul. Easy enough mistake to make but somehow Liebermann failed to notice it since it was opposite his woke agenda.
I don't recall ever mentioning Rand Paul (or Ron Paul). Go back to
sleep. You appear to still be dreaming.
I woke up this morning rather late and watched some YouTube videos. Is
that the woke agenda? It doesn't seem to match the Wikipedia
definition.
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Woke>
Oh, I see. You're still dreaming.
On Wed, 25 Dec 2024 17:34:13 GMT, cyclintom <cyclintom@yahoo.com>
wrote:
This morning I noticed that it wasn't Rand Paul but Ron Paul. Easy enough mistake to make but somehow Liebermann failed to notice it since it was opposite his woke agenda.
I don't recall ever mentioning Rand Paul (or Ron Paul). Go back to
sleep. You appear to still be dreaming.
I woke up this morning rather late and watched some YouTube videos. Is
that the woke agenda? It doesn't seem to match the Wikipedia
definition.
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Woke>
Oh, I see. You're still dreaming.
On Wed Dec 25 13:29:35 2024 Jeff Liebermann wrote:
On Wed, 25 Dec 2024 17:34:13 GMT, cyclintom <cyclintom@yahoo.com>
wrote:
This morning I noticed that it wasn't Rand Paul but Ron Paul. Easy enough mistake to make but somehow Liebermann failed to notice it since it was opposite his woke agenda.
I don't recall ever mentioning Rand Paul (or Ron Paul). Go back to
sleep. You appear to still be dreaming.
I woke up this morning rather late and watched some YouTube videos. Is
that the woke agenda? It doesn't seem to match the Wikipedia
definition.
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Woke>
Oh, I see. You're still dreaming.
I'll qlso bet your curious calculation that showed Trump's over 1/3rd victor7y in electoral votes as "only 16%" No wonder you couldn't get jobs other than changing out ink jet printer cartridges.
Why do you continue to post when esch time it makes you look an even bigger fool?
On 12/26/2024 12:40 PM, cyclintom wrote:
On Wed Dec 25 13:29:35 2024 Jeff Liebermann wrote:
On Wed, 25 Dec 2024 17:34:13 GMT, cyclintom <cyclintom@yahoo.com>
wrote:
This morning I noticed that it wasn't Rand Paul but Ron Paul. Easy enough mistake to make but somehow Liebermann failed to notice it since it was opposite his woke agenda.
I don't recall ever mentioning Rand Paul (or Ron Paul). Go back to
sleep. You appear to still be dreaming.
I woke up this morning rather late and watched some YouTube videos. Is
that the woke agenda? It doesn't seem to match the Wikipedia
definition.
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Woke>
Oh, I see. You're still dreaming.
I'll qlso bet your curious calculation that showed Trump's over 1/3rd victor7y in electoral votes as "only 16%" No wonder you couldn't get jobs other than changing out ink jet printer cartridges.
Why do you continue to post when esch time it makes you look an even bigger fool?
Many of us have cited, repeatedly, the actual vote totals
and also the projected Electoral count, neither of which is
3:1. Or even 4:1 (which would be 1/3 higher than the second
place candidate). Whatever you intended by writing '1/3d
victory', it has no meaning or relevance in light of the
actual numbers.
https://www.reuters.com/graphics/USA-ELECTION/RESULTS/zjpqnemxwvx/president/
How ever did you arrive at that ratio?
On Thu Dec 26 13:01:17 2024 AMuzi wrote:
On 12/26/2024 12:40 PM, cyclintom wrote:
On Wed Dec 25 13:29:35 2024 Jeff Liebermann wrote:
On Wed, 25 Dec 2024 17:34:13 GMT, cyclintom <cyclintom@yahoo.com>
wrote:
This morning I noticed that it wasn't Rand Paul but Ron Paul. Easy enough mistake to make but somehow Liebermann failed to notice it since it was opposite his woke agenda.
I don't recall ever mentioning Rand Paul (or Ron Paul). Go back to
sleep. You appear to still be dreaming.
I woke up this morning rather late and watched some YouTube videos. Is
that the woke agenda? It doesn't seem to match the Wikipedia
definition.
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Woke>
Oh, I see. You're still dreaming.
I'll qlso bet your curious calculation that showed Trump's over 1/3rd victor7y in electoral votes as "only 16%" No wonder you couldn't get jobs other than changing out ink jet printer cartridges.
Why do you continue to post when esch time it makes you look an even bigger fool?
Many of us have cited, repeatedly, the actual vote totals
and also the projected Electoral count, neither of which is
3:1. Or even 4:1 (which would be 1/3 higher than the second
place candidate). Whatever you intended by writing '1/3d
victory', it has no meaning or relevance in light of the
actual numbers.
https://www.reuters.com/graphics/USA-ELECTION/RESULTS/zjpqnemxwvx/president/ >>
How ever did you arrive at that ratio?
While Liebermann is correct that the TOTAL different between Trump the total numver of electoral votes is 16%, that is NOT what we are either looking for nor speaking of. The difference in question is that BETWEEN the candidates and that is 38%. As isusual, the losers do everything to minimize their loses whether it is Krygowski telling us that only New York and California should be the one's running the country and not the aggragation of states, or Liebermann trying to completely misread election
But it is comical that Flunky wishes to deny that I was an avid reader as a youth reading out entire libraries while he picked his nose. It is normal for those with high IQ's to be somewhat solitary and to live more in the world of facts and figures andin books. Flunky prefers to lie about who he is rather than admit his own failures.