On Fri Dec 27 21:59:39 2024 Jeff Liebermann wrote:

On Fri, 27 Dec 2024 14:59:43 -0500, Zen Cycle <funkmaster@hotmail.com>
wrote:

https://jewsforjesus.org
(not generally recognized by the major sects of judaism, but the point >remains...)

That group is mostly tolerated by Jews. I've only had one experience
with them and it wasn't good. I was in the LAX (Los Angeles) terminal
where one of their members was busy accosting passengers and offering literature. I was visiting from the SF Bay area and looking for my
father. I eventually found him, just in time to break up a pushing
and shoving match between my father and the Jews-for-Jesus salesman. I
had never seen my father that angry before or seen him as angry later
in life. I was having difficulty keeping the two apart until I help
arrived from another passenger.

I don't want to go into the reasons behind why my father and most of
the survivors of the concentrations camps failed to appreciate the
actions and inactions of the catholic church. If I did, I would be
arguing all night.

is easy when you know no Jews or deny their religion.

It's even easier when I deny that Tom exists[1]. I had previously
declared debating with Tom to be a monumental waste of my time. I
have had some difficulty ignoring his insults and attacks. Pretending
he doesn't exist makes selectively ignoring Tom much easier.

Given that you're under the delusion that Jews deny the existence of
jesus, it's safe to say I know more jewish people than you do

Tom, I'm really glad that you don't know any Jews. That should
protect them from your amazing facts, bogus claims, inaccurate
numbers, historical revisionism, polarizing opinions, racial bias,
caustic hatred, typo errors, etc.

[1] 09/14/2024
<https://rec.bicycles.tech.narkive.com>
"As far as I'm concerned, Tom Kunich does not exist. He can say
whatever he pleases, he can lie however he wants, he can call me names
and he can invent things to accuse me of doing. What changes now is
that I will no longer respond to any of these. I will pretend that
Tom doesn't exist exactly in the same manner that he hallucinates his
amazing facts. I don't know how much time that will save me, but I
suspect it will be substantial."

You don't debate. You masterbate. Your entire work history showss that you could not even get employment in the hottest electronic market in the entire world. I had a long and prosperous carreer and you replaced ink jet printer cartridges for people that
didn't know how.

You, Flunky and Krygowski showed your intelligence by telling everyone that I still had a Facebook account despite the fact that they had locked me out of it. Now that you morons actually believe that if you could find an account that I could post to it
shows a level of ignorance beyond understanding. Yahoo, Youtube, and Facebook ALL sharply censor ANY posting that doesn't meet "community standards". Community standards are not explained and it is all done using AI and not someone making a real decision.

Isn't it time you tell everyone that there was never any water behind the damn on Cull Canyon?

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Sun Aug 4 21:06:28 2024 Roger Merriman wrote:

Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com> wrote:

On Sun, 04 Aug 2024 10:44:55 GMT, Roger Merriman <roger@sarlet.com>
wrote:

Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com> wrote:

On Thu, 1 Aug 2024 21:36:41 -0000 (UTC), Ted Heise <theise@panix.com>
wrote:

I do wonder if the thing got too wet when riding in the rain a few
days ago, and is getting gradually better as it dries out. Who
knows.

That's a good possibility:

"Rain and moisture has serious detrimental effect on 830"
<https://forums.garmin.com/sports-fitness/cycling/f/edge-830/194977/rain-and-moisture-has-serious-detrimental-effect-on-830>

That seems to be confused, the displayed gradient across all devices be
that Garmin or otherwise tends to lag to some degree ie it s generally not
accurate, particularly noticeable across short sharp climbs where the 20% >> will display after it starts to ease off.

I don't understand what you're saying. The failure mechanism is
rather simple, assuming the Edge 830 uses some type of MEMS (Micro
Electro Mechanical System) pressure sensor: <https://www.sparkfun.com/categories/120> <https://cdn.sparkfun.com/assets/0/c/d/5/3/bmp384-datasheet.pdf>
There are many variations in the sensor. For example, the BMP384
above uses a gel filled cavity to reduce the effects of condensation
and contamination. I have no idea what's actually inside the Garmin
830. None of them are "water proof".

The Gradient lag etc is exhibited on Garmin and other units with and
without a barometer.

Where as the elevation differences quite possibly are related to, a faulty
or wet sensor.

When the altitude (air pressure) readings begin to lag behind the
actual altitude, that the first sign of condensation inside the
sensor. The sensor is something like a tuning fork, which is
deflected by the differential air pressure where one side of the fork
is inside a sealed enclosure, while the other side is exposed to the atmosphere. Add a tiny drop of water to the atmospheric side and the vibration frequency changes, which changes the indicated atmospheric pressure. However, the sealed box might be genuinely hermetically
sealed or it might have a tiny hole in the box which leaks air to re-establish a reference pressure over a long period of time, such as
a few days. I suspect this is the way Garmin does it because the instructions demand that the user re-calibrate the altimeter before
the start of every ride.

The reader comment at: <https://forums.garmin.com/sports-fitness/cycling/f/edge-830/194977/rain-and-moisture-has-serious-detrimental-effect-on-830/1312133#1312133>
provides a clue. The author cycles the air pressure with a vacuum
food box until the altitude delay problem magically went away. What
he did was pump out whatever water vapor or condensate had collected
inside the Edge 830. Heating, to promote evaporation or cooling, to
reduce relative humidity, can also be used to remove water. Installing
a desiccant bag inside the case would probably have prevented the
problem:
<https://www.google.com/search?q=desiccant+bag&tbm=isch>
Replace every one or two years or heat dry the bag: <https://www.roycopackaging.com/blogs/news/a-step-by-step-tutorial-on-how-to-dry-a-desiccant-bag>
Desiccant is also useful for preventing corrosion.

Bad news travels fast, I d not chalk up much with folks on internet having
problems, if it was a known big problem I d expect to see it mentioned >> within the upgrade 840/540 over the 830/530 folks like
<https://www.dcrainmaker.com> who do highly detailed reviews and potential >> issues that come up.

DcRainmaker.com is a really good site for evaluating bicycle
electronics and gizmos: <https://www.dcrainmaker.com/2019/04/garmin-edge-830-cycling-gps-in-depth-review.html>

As for news traveling fast, that's true. However, solutions, theories
and fixes don't appear anywhere near as fast when there is little or
no technical information available from the manufacturer. For
example, when I was looking for a photo of the inside of an Edge 830,
all I could find was the iFixit teardown, which showed very little.
Oops, I didn't notice that there were several 830 teardowns on the
iFixit site. This one shows a little more internal detail but nothing
that would help me find or identify the air pressure sensor: <https://www.ifixit.com/Guide/Garmin+Edge+830+Battery+Replacement/149237>

Ie I m sure it s possible but I m cynical that it s a know issue as you
where.

My experience with Garmin products goes back to 1992(?), when I found myself dealing with the company and their products in both the
avionics and marine sector. My actual involvement in those days was minimal, but was a sufficient excuse to buy an early Garmin GPS-50
which was sufficient for learning something about how GPS works: <http://retro-gps.info/Garmin/Garmin-GPS-50/index.html>
(Mine was for marine use using the same electronics but with a panel
mount enclosure).

I don't want to unload my experiences and disappointments with Garmin
and their products. Sufficient to say that I'm generally disappointed
with Garmin and some of their products and support. Yes, that's
cynical, but then I'm usually cynical with all companies and products
until they demonstrate otherwise.

The 530/830 was a leap ahead can?t remember if the 1030 had come out or not at that point, but the xx30 line Garmin made to combat Wahoo and others, mainly a much more powerful CPU so it didn?t just bug out as old models would.

Essentially Garmin had to stop being so complacent the 520 etc didn?t fair well compared to the competition so they needed to up their game, which unlike Nokia for example they did.

It's possible to "pump" water into an allegedly waterproof enclosure.
Heat the GPS with hot air to about 45C. Then dump it in a bucket of
10C cold water. The air inside the GPS will contract and create a
partial vacuum, which then sucks the water into the enclosure (if
there are any leaks). Look for condensation INSIDE of the enclosure
and intermittent button press failures.

Most consumer GPS products can survived one or two heating and dunking >>> cycles without difficulty. The units that I tested in the mid 1990's
were horrible. None of them survived more than about 10 heating and
dunking cycles. After failure, none of them recovered by themselves
as there was no path for the water vapor to exit the enclosure. I had >>> to disassemble all the test units and hot air dry them. (Hint: Rice
doesn't work).

The Edge 830 has a IPX7 water rating:
<https://www8.garmin.com/manuals/webhelp/edge830/EN-US/GUID-CE2FC337-A232-482C-8747-A49C0098962E.html>
<https://www.garmin.com/en-US/legal/waterrating-definitions/>
"IPX7 - Withstands incidental exposure to water of up to 1 meter for
up to 30 minutes. Suitable for: splashes, rain or snow, showering"

In other words, forget about submerging it in a bucket of water even
though the spec hints that it can be done. That also includes a
puddle of water on the faceplate, standing water on the faceplate
caused by a front bezel that creates a pond, or standing water on any
joint in the pastic case.

The bezel is flat no ridges so water will not pool but be drops though
don t use the silicone case which I guess might make it pool marginally >> more, only problem with rain is the touch screen but one can lock that, and
generally i certainly don t touch the device much once started.

Yes, a silicone case will collect water and is probably a bad idea in
a wet environment. However, it's a good addition if there's any
danger of dropping the Edge 830 on hard pavement.

I suspect the case isn?t water tight to the unit so water would still be drops than a pool let alone the action of riding ie unlikely to perfectly level.

If you suspect that water is the culprit, my suggestions is to open
the Edge 830 case and let it dry out. Hopefully, that will help it
recover.

Sorry about not answering your question earlier. I had no idea what
was causing the problem and didn't think of water incursion until you
mentioned it.

Good luck.

Roger Merriman

Roger Merriman

Roger, Liebermann doesn't even know what you're talking about but is telling you all about it. Most people would find that annoying if not personally insukting. But he continues endlessly.

Have a very merry christmas anhd a happy new year while Jeff is denying the existance of Christ. Flunky denied that Pontius Pilisate ever sent a letter to Ceasar concerning Jesus including him walking on water which is a matter of historical record and
is presently in the Vatican.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)