• =?UTF-8?B?UkU6IFJlOiBQYXRjaGluZyBUUFUgaW5uZXJ0dWJl?=

    From =?UTF-8?B?Y3ljbGludG9t?=@21:1/5 to All on Mon Dec 30 16:14:52 2024
    On Mon Dec 30 00:04:57 2024 John B. wrote:
    On Sun, 29 Dec 2024 16:30:27 GMT, cyclintom <cyclintom@yahoo.com>
    wrote:

    On Sun Dec 29 08:56:53 2024 John B. wrote:

    In fact there is a "Winery" a few miles from where I live now that in
    their marketing shop has all of their wines, from rich to poor,
    available for tasting and there is no double that the more costly
    wines do have a better taste then the low end bottles.




    And without the added chemicals to make it taste like wine you get no hangover.


    And what chemicals would that be?

    --
    Cheers,

    John B.





    The ones that they are no longer required to lisrt on the labels.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From =?UTF-8?B?Y3ljbGludG9t?=@21:1/5 to All on Mon Dec 30 16:19:14 2024
    On Sat Dec 28 18:35:01 2024 Frank Krygowski wrote:
    On 12/28/2024 12:43 PM, zen cycle wrote:
    On 12/27/2024 9:40 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:
    On 12/27/2024 2:01 PM, Zen Cycle wrote:
    On 12/27/2024 1:28 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:

    Given what I've read about violins (Stradivarius can't be told from
    modern ones in blind hearing tests)

    horseshit. Someone with training and experience can most certainly
    tell the difference in the tonal quality between a Stradivarius and
    even a high quality modern violin.

    https://www.science.org/content/article/million-dollar-strads-fall-
    modern-violins-blind-sound-check

    Which doesn't support your claim. You wrote "Stradivarius can't be told from modern ones in blind hearing tests", The article states:

    "the 82 listeners in the test reported that the new violins projected better"

    "asked subjects which of the two violins in a pairing they preferred. Listeners chose the new violins over the old"

    Yes, they could tell the difference.

    This question has been studied many, many times, for decades. The
    consistent results are that players or audience can't tell the difference.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/08/science/a-strad-violinists-cant-tell.html

    https://www.science.org/content/article/elite-violinists-fail-distinguish-legendary-violins-modern-fiddles

    https://www.nationalgeographic.com/science/article/violinists-cant-tell-the-difference-between-stradivarius-violins-and-new-ones

    and wines (cheap wines really light up pleasure centers in the brain >>>> if tasters are told the wine is expensive),

    more horseshit. Someone with training and experience can certainly
    tell the difference in the flavor profiles, especially if you tried
    to dupe them with a Gallo.
    https://money.com/expensive-price-tag-cheap-wine-brain-placebo-effect/

    Which again doesn't support the claim that people couldn't tell the difference. It also doesn't state what qualifications the tasters had,
    if any. I've had crappy $100 bottles of wine and excellent $25 bottles
    of wine. Flavor preference is not the same than as "can't tell the difference".

    If "telling the difference" is the same as "succumbing to the placebo effect," you've got a point. Otherwise, no.




    Then by all means be happy with your half gallon jug of Gallo for $5. My wife who cannot tell one Chardonnay from another could definitely tell Fetzer box wine from other stuff.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From =?UTF-8?B?Y3ljbGludG9t?=@21:1/5 to All on Fri Dec 27 17:56:28 2024
    On Thu Dec 26 15:20:07 2024 Roger Merriman wrote:
    AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:
    On 12/22/2024 8:30 PM, James wrote:
    I got a snake bite puncture on one of my TPU innertubes. I
    haven't bought one of the commercial patch kits, so I
    thought I would try a blob of Aquaseal. Known for it's
    usefulness in repairing neoprene stuff and more, I thought I
    would give it a go.

    I tried to rough up the TPU innertube surface, but the
    sandpaper didn't seem to have much if any effect. I cleaned
    it with a little Windex, and after that had dried and I had
    rubbed it some more with clean tissue paper, I applied a
    drop of Aquaseal to each hole.

    I have the stuff that takes about a day to solidify. I left
    the tube undisturbed for at least 12 hours, though I can't
    recall exactly how long, before putting it back in the wheel
    and inflating.

    This is on my gravel bike, with 40mm tyres that I inflate to
    40-45psi.

    The repair has held for a few hundred kilometers at least,
    and now I have put different tyres on the bike, so I
    inspected the repairs.

    The blobs of glue seem to have spread and flattened a bit,
    but otherwise have appeared to bond well and not leaked.


    Good choice. I knew nothing about the subject before
    snooping around just now. It seems Aquaseal active
    ingredient is methylenediphenyl diisocyanate which is
    compatible to TPU polyurethane.

    https://www.nrs.com/assets/downloads/msds/msds%202291%20aquaseal.pdf

    https://polyurethanes.basf.us/files/pdf/2019-MDI-Handbook_EL.pdf

    Making a reliable bond unlike a simple contact adhesive such
    as a stick-on patch.


    Yup interesting stuff, I?d not persisted with TPU tubes, as on the Gravel bike tubeless has solved that, and TPU seem to puncture just as easily as butyl

    I?ve toyed with idea of the MTB as with that and it?s burly tires punctures aren?t a thing, but on the other hand would one notice the difference with
    a TPU tube in terms of feel?

    Hence I?ve chosen to not fix what isn?t broke for time being.




    I am not sure, I have TPU tubes that lasted till today while the majority of them get flats from everything from torn connections to the Presta filler to somewhat abrasive dust that got into the tire somehow. I think that I have 2 of 12 left plus 1 still
    in a tire.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)