• Re: Bike facilities

    From Roger Merriman@21:1/5 to John B. on Mon Dec 23 20:21:17 2024
    John B. <slocombjb@gmail.com> wrote:
    On 22 Dec 2024 17:54:25 GMT, Roger Merriman <roger@sarlet.com> wrote:

    John B. <slocombjb@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Sun, 22 Dec 2024 02:11:48 -0800, sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com>
    wrote:

    On 12/22/2024 1:33 AM, John B. wrote:

    <snip>

    In my younger days I used to run for exercise and I can assure you
    (and Frankie if he cares to hear the truth) that bicycleing requires >>>>> many more hours to achieve the same amount of "exercise" that running >>>>> does in a much shorter time. And, it might be added, with far less
    spent on equipment :-)

    Running is less costly for equipment, to be sure. But factor in the
    medical costs of running and bicycling is almost certainly less. A
    single knee replacement surgery can cost $35,000.

    But running or walking doesn't necessarily result in bad knees, at
    least in people of a normal weight, and in other (perhaps more
    rational) countries it is much cheaper. Single knee replacement here,
    Bangkok, will be about 10,000 U.S. for a non citizen. For a Thai
    National it is free.


    Running is absolutely hard on joints knees in particular, if folks run
    enough to harm the knees they will probably not be fat as well running
    burns off cake very quickly!

    Certainly in Europe knees would be some degree of free.

    Roger Merriman

    Obviously USians must not be runners as the overwhelming
    characteristic that I see in U.S. tourists if that they are FAT!

    Probably somewhat self selecting! Lot of developed countries have obesity
    an diet problems UK isn’t that far behind US I believe, but plenty of
    runners in places I’m not that far from where Park Run started for example
    go there on a Saturday morning and folks look generally trim and what not.

    Roger Merriman

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Joy Beeson@21:1/5 to All on Mon Dec 23 22:14:26 2024
    On Sun, 22 Dec 2024 08:32:48 +0700, John B. <slocombjb@gmail.com>
    wrote:

    So, a logical solution is simple... ban bicycles from using public
    streets and highways.

    Folklore has it that exactly that was seriously proposed in New York
    State.

    Been nearly half a century since I heard the story. It went on to say
    that that was when the Mohawk-Hudson Wheelmen acquired a
    government-relations committee.

    --
    Joy Beeson
    joy beeson at centurylink dot net
    http://wlweather.net/PAGEJOY/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Roger Merriman@21:1/5 to John B. on Tue Dec 24 11:48:36 2024
    John B. <slocombjb@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Mon, 23 Dec 2024 22:14:26 -0500, Joy Beeson
    <jbeeson@invalid.net.invalid> wrote:

    On Sun, 22 Dec 2024 08:32:48 +0700, John B. <slocombjb@gmail.com>
    wrote:

    So, a logical solution is simple... ban bicycles from using public
    streets and highways.

    Folklore has it that exactly that was seriously proposed in New York
    State.

    Been nearly half a century since I heard the story. It went on to say
    that that was when the Mohawk-Hudson Wheelmen acquired a
    government-relations committee.


    the New York State Legislature was the first legislative body to
    resolve the conflict with the passage in 1887 of An Act in Relation to
    the Use of Bicycles and Tricycles. This statute established for the
    first time that bicycles are "carriages," and that cyclists are
    "entitled to the same rights and subject to the same restrictions" as
    drivers of carriages.


    Are they though? Doesn’t particularly seem so, more that it’s set up for the Benefit of motorists.

    Roger Merriman

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Roger Merriman@21:1/5 to Frank Krygowski on Tue Dec 24 11:56:20 2024
    Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
    On 12/21/2024 4:05 PM, Roger Merriman wrote:
    Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@gXXmail.com> wrote:
    ... Many people are afraid to ride on normal streets.
    They believe or pretend there's no way to be safe if motor vehicles
    share their pavement.


    You get what you design for, build wide road with slip roads or bell
    junctions so motorists don’t need to slow then unsurprisingly that’s what
    you get, ie motor traffic.

    I agree, that is a problem; and from what I've seen, it's much more a
    problem in the U.S. than east of the Atlantic - as usual, I think the
    root cause is our tendency toward sprawl and the greater average travel distances that result.

    Narrow roads aka road diets which seems to be an America thing the phrase
    that is, make junctions so motor traffic has to slow and the distance to
    cross is less, add in filters etc to prevent though traffic etc aka rat
    runs and places become more walkable and attractive to cyclists.

    And I agree with that as well. But convincing the voters is a formidable problem. Officials that slow traffic won't last long in office.

    Part of the problem is psychological. For some reason, for most people a
    30 second delay while driving feels like roughly a two minute delay; and
    an actual two minute delay feels like forever.

    That’s one reason why transit ie bus/trains need to be frequent and regular ie on time. As waiting at a bus stop even for few minutes can feel like
    days etc!

    True story: A particular street that I have to drive every day got a
    "road diet" maybe a year to 18 months ago. Four lanes were reduced to
    two, one in each direction (plus bike lanes, almost totally unused).
    Anyway, at a couple intersections with larger roads, there have been
    times the queue waiting for a green light has been so long that I've
    missed the green and had to sit through another cycle of the lights.

    Was it critical? No, and I realize that extra minute or two makes no practical difference. But despite my "It doesn't matter; it doesn't
    matter" mantra, it felt very irritating.

    I think very few motorists use that mantra.

    As ever the devil is in the detail, to be honest with a large town/small
    city like Youngstown I think most folks would expect some traffic if they
    drove into the centre.

    Are number of things could be done, some good some imperfect such as bus lane/routes down the freeway that criss cross it, since there is huge
    freeways close to most folks homes, and the tow will be paying for them ie maintenance etc.

    I’d note that America is rather different situation ie not as simple as “just go Dutch” who planned similar car centric highways through cities as did lots of places, but American built them! In other places only a few got built my commute is along the track of one of the intended motorway rings
    of london never built.

    Ie this is simple = wrong situation, I think the planning laws ie zoning
    might be the easiest thing to slowly change away from being so car centric.

    But either way for America it’s a much more challenging situation than it
    was in Europe.

    Roger Merriman

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From zen cycle@21:1/5 to Joy Beeson on Tue Dec 24 07:30:38 2024
    On 12/23/2024 10:14 PM, Joy Beeson wrote:
    On Sun, 22 Dec 2024 08:32:48 +0700, John B. <slocombjb@gmail.com>
    wrote:

    So, a logical solution is simple... ban bicycles from using public
    streets and highways.

    Folklore has it that exactly that was seriously proposed in New York
    State.

    Been nearly half a century since I heard the story. It went on to say
    that that was when the Mohawk-Hudson Wheelmen acquired a
    government-relations committee.

    Bedford UK https://road.cc/content/news/bike-ban-council-says-it-wants-safe-place-310571

    Birmingham UK
    https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c7v3n5nr32jo

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Roger Merriman@21:1/5 to zen cycle on Tue Dec 24 21:03:43 2024
    zen cycle <funkmasterxx@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On 12/23/2024 10:14 PM, Joy Beeson wrote:
    On Sun, 22 Dec 2024 08:32:48 +0700, John B. <slocombjb@gmail.com>
    wrote:

    So, a logical solution is simple... ban bicycles from using public
    streets and highways.

    Folklore has it that exactly that was seriously proposed in New York
    State.

    Been nearly half a century since I heard the story. It went on to say
    that that was when the Mohawk-Hudson Wheelmen acquired a
    government-relations committee.

    Bedford UK https://road.cc/content/news/bike-ban-council-says-it-wants-safe-place-310571

    Birmingham UK
    https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c7v3n5nr32jo


    For clarity these are both, pedestrianised areas than roads, And are using
    anti social legislation than traffic legislation for that reason.

    Local government have limited powers and certainly can’t ban bikes from
    roads without traffic orders which would have to be justified. Ie needs
    more than a local councillor with a one tracked mind, it’s a serious investment in time and money.

    Hence with few exceptions big multi lane roads even at high speeds
    encounters with cyclists/walkers/horse-riders, farm vehicles and so on are while maybe not common certain not unexpected.

    Roger Merriman

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)