On Mon Dec 23 12:46:30 2024 AMuzi wrote:

On 12/23/2024 12:40 PM, cyclintom wrote:

On Mon Dec 23 12:08:01 2024 AMuzi wrote:

On 12/23/2024 12:00 PM, cyclintom wrote:

On Mon Dec 23 07:51:00 2024 John B. wrote:

Why is a foreigner speaking good English so unusual? My first wife, a >>>> Japanese National, certainly spoke very good English and could spell >>>> far better then you can.

Firstly, you can show no proof that your late wife could spell as well as I can.
Secondly, Japan was under occupation for 20 years and most Japanese speak better English than you Thai.

But you're willing to say absolutely anything.

US occupation of Home Islands was only until 1952.

Possessions, such as Okinawa, were reverted in 1971.
(which was extremely unpopular among Okinawans BTW.
Girlfriend, who was living on Okinawa at the time, describes
that period as quite violent.)

American military presence in Japan has only ended recently "The United States occupation of Japan officially ended in 1952 when a peace treaty was signed. However, it is important to note that the United States and Japan continue to maintain a

strong alliance, and the US military presence in Japan supports defense and security cooperation between the two countries."

Occupation has a specific meaning and that occupation ended
in 1952.

There are not only significant US military installations in
Japan today, one of my customers was base commander at the
Navy Yokosuka base at Yokohama until recently. It's huge:

https://nara.getarchive.net/media/an-aerial-view-of-the-yokosuka-naval-base-looking-south-southwest-a03de2

and one of many across Japan. We aren't leaving any time soon.

Really Andrew, you should take that up with the Japanese and not me. Tell them that direct occupation ended in 1952.

https://apnews.com/article/japan-tokyo-fumio-kishida-cd59cd42d50b9f4e97221eda41d1be35

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Tue Dec 24 07:49:19 2024 zen cycle wrote:

On 12/23/2024 12:48 PM, cyclintom wrote:

On Mon Dec 23 12:30:34 2024 zen cycle wrote:

On 12/23/2024 12:04 PM, cyclintom wrote:

Lieberann, you should stop showing why you couldn't get a job in the hottest EE jon mstket in the world.

Could it be because you could spell Techtronix better than you could use one?

We know he didn't spell it techtronix...

But he can't explain why his idea of a Techtronix wire fault detector works exactly like my variable wavelength detector that both you and he denied would even work. Say something else so stupid it further proves that your "higher" education waqs in

fact, lower

No, tommy, it didn't work exactly like your "variable wavelength
detector". Nothing works exactly like your "variable wavelength
detector" because your "variable wavelength detector" doesn't work - it
can't work without violating the laws of physics.

What is you stupid excuse for not under standing how their wire fayult detector worked?

He understands it better than you ever had the capacity to understand
it. Once again, it doesn't use PWM.

Show us another picture of your degree as if your entire job history didn't prove it a lie.

Tell us again how some allegedly genius software engineer calculated
that a vote count of 312 to 226 is 75% to 25%.

Now you don't even know how a wire fault detector works despite them explaining it

"them"? Who is "them"?

and showing pictures of the PWM.

no, tommy, no one showed any PWM pictures in the context of cable
testing. They showed TDR pulse diagrams, which are _not_ PWM.

Let me guess, you're an idiot?

You still haven't shown any evidence of a PWM cable tester. Why is that.
We don't have to guess, it's because you're an idiot.

Is there some reason that you cannot simply look at the advertisement from Techtronixs and their pictures of it working and not decern how it works? Tell them that PWM doesn't work.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)