• Re: Tom's demons are strong today! Re: RE: Re: Higher Education Is Over

    From Joy Beeson@21:1/5 to All on Mon Dec 30 22:16:03 2024
    On Sun, 29 Dec 2024 18:27:07 -0800, Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com>
    wrote:

    In the 1960's, the average public library had about 50,000 books on
    the shelves. Today, my guess would be about 250,000 books.

    Public libraries are aggessively reducing the number of books on the
    shelves. Ours has a used-book sale every other week, and it isn't
    keeping up with the discards.

    --
    Joy Beeson
    joy beeson at centurylink dot net
    http://wlweather.net/PAGEJOY/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Catrike Rider@21:1/5 to jbeeson@invalid.net.invalid on Tue Dec 31 04:16:42 2024
    On Mon, 30 Dec 2024 22:16:03 -0500, Joy Beeson
    <jbeeson@invalid.net.invalid> wrote:

    On Sun, 29 Dec 2024 18:27:07 -0800, Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com>
    wrote:

    In the 1960's, the average public library had about 50,000 books on
    the shelves. Today, my guess would be about 250,000 books.

    Public libraries are aggessively reducing the number of books on the
    shelves. Ours has a used-book sale every other week, and it isn't
    keeping up with the discards.

    Our grandchildren will be telling their grandchildren about back in
    the old days when books were written on paper and you couldn't even
    change the font.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Shadow@21:1/5 to All on Tue Dec 24 14:08:40 2024
    On Tue, 24 Dec 2024 16:28:06 GMT, cyclintom <cyclintom@yahoo.com>
    wrote:

    On Sun Dec 22 11:54:45 2024 Jeff Liebermann wrote:
    On Sun, 22 Dec 2024 17:32:42 GMT, cyclintom <cyclintom@yahoo.com>
    wrote:

    Eisenhower chose Nixon as his running mate for the very simple reason that he was probably thge finest in6ternational scholar alive at that time. It was nesessary for the Demecrats to silence Nixon because not only did he make sense to most Americans
    but he promised the dawn of a brave new Republican world.

    Therefore the Democrats had to commit election fraud on a grander scale than they had been doing. Nixon commented on that in front of Colonel Oliver North and North decided he had to know what the Democrats' plans were. So he planned and invaded the
    Democrats inner sanctom. It was plan that Nixon had nothing to do with it because it was clumbsy and ineffective, far different from what Nixon would have done. But the Slime Stream Media dumped it into Nixon's lap and hounded him into resigning. To that
    point most of the media was at least polite. But the moment they smelled blood in the water, like the sharks they were, they were tearing Nixon to bits. I wish to remind you of Nixon's last speech. "Your President is not a crook." What's more he never
    needed to be one.

    Now here are 50 years after the event and even from that distance Krygowski still cannot think about what happened. Even with the Nixon Foundation'z vidios of Nixon speeches showing him to have been far too smart to even try something like Watergate.

    Krygowski insists on being stupid because Nixon was a first class Liberal whereas Frank is and remains a stupid socialist.

    This is closer to reality on why Eisenhower wanted Nixon as VP.
    <https://www2.gwu.edu/~erpapers/mep/displaydoc.cfm?docid=erpn-ricnix>
    I guess(tm) this is what you consider to be an "international
    scholar".
    "Nixon was kept outside of the president's inner circle, yet he
    developed considerable skill in foreign policy, which was demonstrated
    in his 1959 confrontation in Moscow with Soviet premier Nikita
    Khrushchev, known as the kitchen debate."

    You also screwed up your dates and events, but I don't have time to
    fix that for you.

    Eisenhower wanted Nixon as VP because Nixon was viewed a fervent
    anti-communist because he was a member of the HUAC (House Un-American
    Activities Committee) and because he worked on alien registration
    laws. At the time, the "Red Scare" was very much on everyone's mind.
    <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_Scare#Second_Red_Scare_(1947%E2%80%931957)>




    As usual, Error 404 Page Not Found.

    Try pasting it into a web browser. Notepad will not work.
    HTH
    []'s

    But Liebermann who wasn't alive at that time is willing to tell us all about it. Just like saying that the Techtronix wire fault detector is the way to measure wire length when it operates exactly like my home made device. Or that he could tell you that
    I am wrong about mud conditions on Cull Canyon by looking at a picture from Google Earth of unknown date. Liebermann - your life is a failure because you can never learn from your mistakes.
    --
    Don't be evil - Google 2004
    We have a new policy - Google 2012
    Google Fuchsia - 2021

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Shadow@21:1/5 to All on Tue Dec 24 15:39:25 2024
    On Tue, 24 Dec 2024 18:04:49 GMT, cyclintom <cyclintom@yahoo.com>
    wrote:

    Liebermann, you're the only person in the world that can believe that winning >by 86 votes in the electoral college where Trump needed only 270 votes to
    win and he had 312 is only 16%.

    Trump 312 votes
    Harris 226 votes
    Total 538 votes

    Percentage of Trumps votes = number of votes/total of votes* 100 =
    312/538*100 = 58%

    Percentage of Harris votes = number of votes/total of votes* 100 = 226/538*100=42%

    58% + 42% = 100%. Just checking data is valid.

    Trump won by 58% - 42% = 16%

    So now you know why degrees are important, and why only people that
    can think logically can get them (well, in sciences anyway)

    Liebermann's calculus was correct, assuming the number of votes is
    also correct.

    That stupidity alone should disqualify you for welfare.

    And yet it didn't. Biden and Obama were kind to you. You still
    live on welfare.

    But chins up, Trump will be giving you a 75% raise next
    year**, because he gave his "word" he would and he loves poor people.
    []'s

    ** in taxes, but hey, 75% is 75% !!!!
    --
    Don't be evil - Google 2004
    We have a new policy - Google 2012
    Google Fuchsia - 2021

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jeff Liebermann@21:1/5 to All on Tue Dec 24 12:05:52 2024
    On Tue, 24 Dec 2024 17:47:44 GMT, cyclintom <cyclintom@yahoo.com>
    wrote:

    Flunky believes the Democrat's version of what happened. He thinks that Archebald Cox was a "historian" though part of the open attack on Nixon,

    Archibald Cox was the special prosecutor. In order to prosecute, he
    is expected to "attack" the defendant (Nixon). I don't think anyone
    expected him to be on Nixon's side.

    a registered Democrat who the Democrats wouldn't touch when he approved of the far left Supreme Court judges they wanted installed.

    At the time, far left was the Democratic party. You say the Democrats
    would touch Cox because he approved of the far left judges that the
    Democrats wanted installed? That makes no sense.


    --
    Jeff Liebermann jeffl@cruzio.com
    PO Box 272 http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
    Ben Lomond CA 95005-0272
    Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jeff Liebermann@21:1/5 to All on Tue Dec 24 11:41:58 2024
    On Tue, 24 Dec 2024 18:04:49 GMT, cyclintom <cyclintom@yahoo.com>
    wrote:

    On Sun Dec 22 12:32:15 2024 Jeff Liebermann wrote:
    On Sun, 22 Dec 2024 14:39:18 -0500, Frank Krygowski
    <frkrygow@gXXmail.com> wrote:

    On 12/22/2024 12:51 PM, cyclintom wrote:
    On Mon Dec 16 22:36:57 2024 Frank Krygowski wrote:
    On 12/16/2024 5:59 PM, cyclintom wrote:

    I will just note that Frank feels very uncomrfortable when I keep making points. According to him Trump barely won when in fact he held a 75/25 victory.

    Oh, please DO show us your "75/25" computations in detail!

    After telling us that you had to teach high level math it sort of stood out that you didn't correct me.

    It's obvious your "75/25" statement was wrong. If you want me to correct
    your math in detail - that is, so you wouldn't repeat your mistake -
    you'd have to show me your work.

    You've refused to do that. I can't help you.

    Help is always possible. Whether the recipient is interested in being
    helped is the current problem. Tom wants to be the source and origin
    of literally everything in rec.bicycles.tech. If someone else makes a
    valid claim, backs it with references and explains how it works in
    detail, Tom will want no part of it and claim that it's a Democratic
    party conspiracy. He might also claim that he didn't see the message,
    couldn't read it because his anti-virus program wasn't allowing him to
    see it, or simply ignore any further discussion on the topic.

    These Percentage Vote Calculators might help, assuming Tom is able to
    read, think and calculate:
    <https://www.calculatorsoup.com/calculators/statistics/vote-percentage-calculator.php>
    <https://www.quora.com/How-is-the-percentage-of-votes-calculated-in-an-election-For-instance-if-there-are-1000-voters-and-one-candidate-receives-500-votes-what-would-be-the-percentage>

    Liebermann, you're the only person in the world that can believe that winning by 86 votes in the electoral college where Trump needed only 270 votes to win and he had 312 is only 16%. That stupidity alone should disqualify you for welfare.

    In deference to your limited ability to do simple arithmetic, I posted
    my calculations in as simple a manner as possible. I also provided
    links to two online calculators (above) that will do the arithmetic
    for you without the need to deal with intermediate results. I can do
    no more to help you.

    08/03/2022 <https://groups.google.com/g/rec.bicycles.tech/c/cJi96AJ2A3k/m/JEyDC0TDBgAJ> "I'll bet that there wasn't anything I didn't do wrong"


    --
    Jeff Liebermann jeffl@cruzio.com
    PO Box 272 http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
    Ben Lomond CA 95005-0272
    Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jeff Liebermann@21:1/5 to All on Tue Dec 24 11:28:42 2024
    On Tue, 24 Dec 2024 16:28:06 GMT, cyclintom <cyclintom@yahoo.com>
    wrote:

    On Sun Dec 22 11:54:45 2024 Jeff Liebermann wrote:
    On Sun, 22 Dec 2024 17:32:42 GMT, cyclintom <cyclintom@yahoo.com>
    wrote:

    Eisenhower chose Nixon as his running mate for the very simple reason that he was probably thge finest in6ternational scholar alive at that time. It was nesessary for the Demecrats to silence Nixon because not only did he make sense to most Americans
    but he promised the dawn of a brave new Republican world.

    Therefore the Democrats had to commit election fraud on a grander scale than they had been doing. Nixon commented on that in front of Colonel Oliver North and North decided he had to know what the Democrats' plans were. So he planned and invaded the
    Democrats inner sanctom. It was plan that Nixon had nothing to do with it because it was clumbsy and ineffective, far different from what Nixon would have done. But the Slime Stream Media dumped it into Nixon's lap and hounded him into resigning. To that
    point most of the media was at least polite. But the moment they smelled blood in the water, like the sharks they were, they were tearing Nixon to bits. I wish to remind you of Nixon's last speech. "Your President is not a crook." What's more he never
    needed to be one.

    Now here are 50 years after the event and even from that distance Krygowski still cannot think about what happened. Even with the Nixon Foundation'z vidios of Nixon speeches showing him to have been far too smart to even try something like Watergate.

    Krygowski insists on being stupid because Nixon was a first class Liberal whereas Frank is and remains a stupid socialist.

    This is closer to reality on why Eisenhower wanted Nixon as VP.
    <https://www2.gwu.edu/~erpapers/mep/displaydoc.cfm?docid=erpn-ricnix>
    I guess(tm) this is what you consider to be an "international
    scholar".
    "Nixon was kept outside of the president's inner circle, yet he
    developed considerable skill in foreign policy, which was demonstrated
    in his 1959 confrontation in Moscow with Soviet premier Nikita
    Khrushchev, known as the kitchen debate."

    You also screwed up your dates and events, but I don't have time to
    fix that for you.

    Eisenhower wanted Nixon as VP because Nixon was viewed a fervent
    anti-communist because he was a member of the HUAC (House Un-American
    Activities Committee) and because he worked on alien registration
    laws. At the time, the "Red Scare" was very much on everyone's mind.
    <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_Scare#Second_Red_Scare_(1947%E2%80%931957)>


    As usual, Error 404 Page Not Found.

    Very few of the web servers produce "Error 404 Page Not Found". More
    commonly, it's just "404 page not found". See for yourself: <https://www.google.com/search?q=404+page+not+found&udm=2>
    You either can't accurately copy what's on the screen or you're lying
    as usual. If you're going to hallucinate error messages, at least
    write something clever, humorous or entertaining.

    Also as usual, you're the only person with the alleged problem. Fix
    it yourself. You experience far too many problems for them to be
    believable.

    But Liebermann who wasn't alive at that time is willing to tell us all about it.

    What time (or date)? Try to be a little less vague and evasive.

    I was born in 1948 and was very much alive when Nixon was president
    (1969 - 1974). I was also alive when Nixon was vice-president (1953 -
    1961). I have fond memories of the Watergate scandal, where one of my roommates in college hung a rather large print of Nixon the wall of
    our dorm room. At the time, I was a Libertarian which made for some interesting conversation.

    Just like saying that the Techtronix wire fault detector is the way to measure wire length when it operates exactly like my home made device. Or that he could tell you that I am wrong about mud conditions on Cull Canyon by looking at a picture from
    Google Earth of unknown date. Liebermann - your life is a failure because you can never learn from your mistakes.

    Thanks for demonstrating your ineptitude. A wire fault detector is a continuity tester. A cable fault detector is a TDR. Show me a
    continuity tester that measures cable length and I might believe a
    small part of the rubbish you're unloading in RBT.




    --
    Jeff Liebermann jeffl@cruzio.com
    PO Box 272 http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
    Ben Lomond CA 95005-0272
    Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jeff Liebermann@21:1/5 to All on Tue Dec 24 12:36:03 2024
    On Tue, 24 Dec 2024 12:05:52 -0800, Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com>
    wrote:

    On Tue, 24 Dec 2024 17:47:44 GMT, cyclintom <cyclintom@yahoo.com>
    wrote:

    Flunky believes the Democrat's version of what happened. He thinks that Archebald Cox was a "historian" though part of the open attack on Nixon,

    Archibald Cox was the special prosecutor. In order to prosecute, he
    is expected to "attack" the defendant (Nixon). I don't think anyone
    expected him to be on Nixon's side.

    a registered Democrat who the Democrats wouldn't touch when he approved of the far left Supreme Court judges they wanted installed.

    At the time, far left was the Democratic party. You say the Democrats
    would touch Cox because he approved of the far left judges that the
    Democrats wanted installed? That makes no sense.

    Oops. I forgot the word "not":

    At the time, far left was the Democratic party. You say the Democrats
    would not touch Cox because he approved of the far left judges that
    the Democrats wanted installed? That makes no sense.

    --
    Jeff Liebermann jeffl@cruzio.com
    PO Box 272 http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
    Ben Lomond CA 95005-0272
    Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From AMuzi@21:1/5 to AMuzi on Tue Dec 24 14:29:35 2024
    On 12/24/2024 12:36 PM, AMuzi wrote:
    On 12/24/2024 12:11 PM, cyclintom wrote:
    On Tue Dec 24 13:03:29 2024 zen cycle  wrote:

    At no time did you post any proof of a 75/25 split.

      > and that ass Liebermann showed that he cannot do
    simple arithmetic.

    Jeffs calculations were correct.

      > Why don't you use his garbage and claim it is correct?

    Still waiting for you to show work that proves 312/226 is
    75/25


    Your right, I should have said 62/38. You are one of the
    world biggest losers, but then your postings constantly
    during working hours proved that long ago.Your fear that
    your employer might find out about you is halarius,
    .

    75/25 is just wrong.
    62/38 is no better.

    570 electoral votes 2024* 312 to 226.
    That's 58 to 42

    https://www.reuters.com/graphics/USA-ELECTION/RESULTS/
    zjpqnemxwvx/president/


    Popular vote of 155,211,283 went 77,301,997 to 75,017,626.
    That's 49.8 to 48.3 (plus minor candidates)

    https://www.cookpolitical.com/vote-tracker/2024/electoral-
    college


    *Electors have not yet actually voted.


    Typo. There are 538 total EC votes available.

    --
    Andrew Muzi
    am@yellowjersey.org
    Open every day since 1 April, 1971

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tom Kunich@21:1/5 to zen cycle on Tue Dec 31 20:42:47 2024
    On Mon, 23 Dec 2024 06:54:06 -0500, zen cycle wrote:

    On 12/22/2024 12:48 PM, cyclintom wrote:
    On Sat Dec 14 20:55:23 2024 Frank Krygowski wrote:
    On 12/14/2024 6:19 PM, Tom Kunich wrote:
    On Sat, 14 Dec 2024 14:31:09 -0500, Frank Krygowski wrote:

    On 12/14/2024 2:12 PM, Tom Kunich wrote:
    On Sun, 08 Dec 2024 23:10:41 -0500, Frank Krygowski wrote:


    I'll just note that Tom has been stuck in high rant mode for
    several days now. I wonder what's triggered him. Did another crank >>>>>>> arm fall off?
    Did Janet Yellen refuse his phone consultation? Did Trump pass him >>>>>>> over for a Cabinet position yet again? ;-)

    Poor little Frank, with Biden's inflation eating iunto his
    retirement he finds himself not wanted at Youngstown. Too woke. The >>>>>> world changes but not Krygowski. Socialism is out of fashion.

    :-) Last night I paid some bills via the internet. I was pleased to
    see that the state teacher's retirement system gave us an extra
    bonus check yesterday. Let me know if you need a loan, Tom.

    So even your state teachers retirement system is happy that Trump was
    elected. They would NOT have done that if the hyena was elected.

    I'm shaking my head. No matter which way facts and figures come out,
    you try to paint everything as evidence that your particular politics
    are infallible.

    "Frank's going broke and it's because of Biden." "Oops, Frank's doing
    well... um, but it's because of Trump."

    Ah well. At least I'm not the guy who lost money during the Obama
    years,
    when everyone's investments but Tom's soared.




    More invention from the man who would be Jobst.

    No, dumbass, you've repeatedly claimed to have lost a vast majority of
    your "fortune" when obama was president. It's not franks invention, it's
    your claim.

    So, le5t me get this straight, you do not believe that going from $880,000
    to $330,000 is a large loss? I did not make this back until the end of
    Obama's 8th year and no thanks to him. My growth to well over a million
    didn't occur until Trump and then only because Janet Yellon was busy
    wrecking the American economy herself with her insane theories on the
    economy.

    But that's OK, since you believe that the only way to show that you have
    money is to throw it around as if money isn't important, we'll wait for
    you to show us a picture of your new Ferrari.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From zen cycle@21:1/5 to Tom Kunich on Wed Jan 1 09:24:00 2025
    On 12/31/2024 3:42 PM, Tom Kunich wrote:
    On Mon, 23 Dec 2024 06:54:06 -0500, zen cycle wrote:



    No, dumbass, you've repeatedly claimed to have lost a vast majority of
    your "fortune" when obama was president. It's not franks invention, it's
    your claim.

    So, le5t me get this straight, you do not believe that going from $880,000
    to $330,000 is a large loss?

    of course it is. It just didn't happen to you.


    I did not make this back until the end of
    Obama's 8th year and no thanks to him. My growth to well over a million didn't occur until Trump and then only because Janet Yellon was busy
    wrecking the American economy herself with her insane theories on the economy.

    But that's OK, since you believe that the only way to show that you have money is to throw it around as if money isn't important

    Where did I write that?

    , we'll wait for
    you to show us a picture of your new Ferrari.

    I'll do that as soon as you post an image of you investment account
    statement.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jeff Liebermann@21:1/5 to frkrygow@sbcglobal.net on Thu Dec 26 20:52:50 2024
    On Thu, 26 Dec 2024 22:03:57 -0500, Frank Krygowski
    <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:

    On 12/26/2024 1:45 PM, cyclintom wrote:

    He had posted in two different areas that he was an Argentinian and a Brazilian. He had NOT posted that he is a doctor of any sort ...

    Tom, everyone who has commented has said you're wrong.

    Either give it up, or post links to the posts you're claiming Shadow
    made that prove your point.

    Keeping up your nonsense claims with no documentation makes you look
    even more of a fool.

    What Tom is doing is trying to establish himself as an unassailable
    authority on everything. The object of his game is to demonstrate
    that his authority cannot be questioned. He does this by endlessly
    repeating wrong information on the assumption that doing so will wear
    down resistance to his unassailable authority. To Tom, this lack of
    resistance is an indication that he is correct, and therefore some
    manner of authority.

    I would normally write an FAQ the details most of Tom's false
    assertions along with the necessary corrections, links and references.
    Since all of Tom's claims seems to be wrong, that's far too much work.
    The best I can do is continue fact checking and writing corrections.

    The problem is that neither an FAQ or continuous fact checking will
    work because Tom does not care about being wrong. I don't understand
    how he thinks he can make so many mistakes while simultaneously
    expecting people in RBT to worship him as a model of perfection. If
    he actually cared about being wrong, he would do something fix his own mistakes. However that hasn't happened and probably never will
    happen.


    --
    Jeff Liebermann jeffl@cruzio.com
    PO Box 272 http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
    Ben Lomond CA 95005-0272
    Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jeff Liebermann@21:1/5 to All on Fri Dec 27 12:19:48 2024
    On Tue, 24 Dec 2024 16:57:32 GMT, cyclintom <cyclintom@yahoo.com>
    wrote:

    It really pains you for me to have a long resume and recommendations from PhD's and all you have is a lousy PE that isn't worth the paper it's printed on. Engineers engineer things. Fools believe that assigning things to a class from textbooks written
    by real engineers makes them engineers.

    I seem to recall the you "read out" 4 libraries in order to gain the
    knowledge that allows you to call yourself an engineer.

    06/07/2022 <https://groups.google.com/g/rec.bicycles.tech/c/QNPNSofg064/m/Xaamy15iBQAJ>
    "I would warrant that I've read more than 20 times more books than you
    have. I read out three public libraries, the military library and all
    of the books I used to gain the knowledge to become an engineer."

    Obviously, someone told you which books to read or you would be
    reading engineering books forever. You would never finish reading
    because new books arrive faster than you can read them. Or, you could
    claim that you knew which library books to read because they came to
    you in a dream.





    --
    Jeff Liebermann jeffl@cruzio.com
    PO Box 272 http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
    Ben Lomond CA 95005-0272
    Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Zen Cycle@21:1/5 to Jeff Liebermann on Fri Dec 27 15:53:31 2024
    On 12/27/2024 3:19 PM, Jeff Liebermann wrote:
    On Tue, 24 Dec 2024 16:57:32 GMT, cyclintom <cyclintom@yahoo.com>
    wrote:

    It really pains you for me to have a long resume and recommendations from PhD's and all you have is a lousy PE that isn't worth the paper it's printed on. Engineers engineer things. Fools believe that assigning things to a class from textbooks written
    by real engineers makes them engineers.

    I seem to recall the you "read out" 4 libraries in order to gain the knowledge that allows you to call yourself an engineer.

    06/07/2022 <https://groups.google.com/g/rec.bicycles.tech/c/QNPNSofg064/m/Xaamy15iBQAJ> "I would warrant that I've read more than 20 times more books than you
    have. I read out three public libraries, the military library and all
    of the books I used to gain the knowledge to become an engineer."

    Obviously, someone told you which books to read or you would be
    reading engineering books forever. You would never finish reading
    because new books arrive faster than you can read them. Or, you could
    claim that you knew which library books to read because they came to
    you in a dream.

    I recall he modified that later on to claim to have read all of the "non-fiction" volumes

    --
    Add xx to reply

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jeff Liebermann@21:1/5 to All on Fri Dec 27 14:38:00 2024
    On Fri, 27 Dec 2024 21:01:24 GMT, cyclintom <cyclintom@yahoo.com>
    wrote:

    On Tue Dec 24 12:51:40 2024 zen cycle wrote:
    Yup. from
    <https://www2.gwu.edu/~erpapers/mep/displaydoc.cfm?docid=erpn-ricnix>
    "Copyright

    and from
    <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_Scare#Second_Red_Scare_(1947%E2%80%931957)>
    "Second Red Scare (1947?1957)
    Main article: McCarthyism"

    You're the only one who can't open Jeffs links.

    There you go - Elinor Rossevelt who was the Wife of a vile racist pig, is an authority on Richard Nixon when Nixon and Truman agreed on most things.


    Who are you to pass judgment on whether Eleanor Roosevelt is an
    authority on the McCarthy (Red Scare) era, when you are probably the
    least authoritative person in rec.bicycles.tech on that era?

    I think you'll find that Eleanor Roosevelt was well informed and a
    very prolific writer:
    <https://erpapers.columbian.gwu.edu/editorial-methods>

    Her papers ended up in the Eleanor Roosevelt Papers collection at
    Columbia University:
    <https://erpapers.columbian.gwu.edu>

    As for FDR being a racist, I could probably have some fun excavating
    examples of your racist comments in rec.bicycles.tech. However,
    you're not worth the time and effort.

    Some light reading on FDR and race relations:

    "Franklin D. Roosevelt and civil rights" <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Franklin_D._Roosevelt_and_civil_rights>

    It was under FDR that the executive order prohibiting federal hiring discrimination by race was enacted:
    "Executive Order 8802"
    <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Executive_Order_8802>

    Wrong on all counts, as usual.
    --
    Jeff Liebermann jeffl@cruzio.com
    PO Box 272 http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
    Ben Lomond CA 95005-0272
    Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jeff Liebermann@21:1/5 to All on Fri Dec 27 18:49:37 2024
    On Fri, 27 Dec 2024 23:00:06 GMT, cyclintom <cyclintom@yahoo.com>
    wrote:

    You are so full of shit about the Techtronix wire fault detector it is nothing more than your stupid claim that you don't program because it is so boring. The photographs PLAINLY showed that it was using variable wavelength signals to detect wire faults.
    It SET the signal to reflect off of the end of the wire and intermediate reflections or total wirelength shown on the signal and on the actual length of wire is childishly simple. Too bad you're having so much trouble with these things.

    OK. So what is the Tektronix model number for this "wire fault
    detector" and where are the photographs you mention?

    BTW, you still haven't learned how to spell Tektronix:
    <https://www.tek.com>
    I know it's difficult for you but after you write it correctly a few
    hundred times, you'll probably learn the correct spelling.

    You also don't seem to know the difference between a wire and a cable.


    --
    Jeff Liebermann jeffl@cruzio.com
    PO Box 272 http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
    Ben Lomond CA 95005-0272
    Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jeff Liebermann@21:1/5 to All on Fri Dec 27 18:40:43 2024
    On Fri, 27 Dec 2024 21:08:21 GMT, cyclintom <cyclintom@yahoo.com>
    wrote:

    On Tue Dec 24 19:56:56 2024 Frank Krygowski wrote:
    On 12/24/2024 11:28 AM, cyclintom wrote:
    On Sun Dec 22 11:54:45 2024 Jeff Liebermann wrote:

    Eisenhower wanted Nixon as VP because Nixon was viewed a fervent
    anti-communist because he was a member of the HUAC (House Un-American
    Activities Committee) and because he worked on alien registration
    laws. At the time, the "Red Scare" was very much on everyone's mind.
    <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_Scare#Second_Red_Scare_(1947%E2%80%931957)>

    As usual, Error 404 Page Not Found.

    As usual, Jeff's link opened immediately for me. Damn, Tom, your
    incompetence knows no bounds!

    I use Bit Defender which is the best antivirus in the world. You're not smart enough to protect yourself from the world around you. Don't tell me whose is incompetent since plainly you are.

    It's called BitDefender:
    <https://www.bitdefender.com>
    You really should try to remember the names of the programs and
    companies.

    Are you sure you're using BitDefender instead of BitOffender, which
    filters out everything you find offensive and leaves the malware
    untouched? That might be the source of your computer problems.


    --
    Jeff Liebermann jeffl@cruzio.com
    PO Box 272 http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
    Ben Lomond CA 95005-0272
    Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jeff Liebermann@21:1/5 to All on Fri Dec 27 18:35:03 2024
    On Fri, 27 Dec 2024 22:03:19 GMT, cyclintom <cyclintom@yahoo.com>
    wrote:

    On Fri Dec 27 12:19:48 2024 Jeff Liebermann wrote:
    On Tue, 24 Dec 2024 16:57:32 GMT, cyclintom <cyclintom@yahoo.com>
    wrote:

    It really pains you for me to have a long resume and recommendations from PhD's and all you have is a lousy PE that isn't worth the paper it's printed on. Engineers engineer things. Fools believe that assigning things to a class from textbooks
    written by real engineers makes them engineers.

    I seem to recall the you "read out" 4 libraries in order to gain the
    knowledge that allows you to call yourself an engineer.

    06/07/2022
    <https://groups.google.com/g/rec.bicycles.tech/c/QNPNSofg064/m/Xaamy15iBQAJ> >> "I would warrant that I've read more than 20 times more books than you
    have. I read out three public libraries, the military library and all
    of the books I used to gain the knowledge to become an engineer."

    Obviously, someone told you which books to read or you would be
    reading engineering books forever. You would never finish reading
    because new books arrive faster than you can read them. Or, you could
    claim that you knew which library books to read because they came to
    you in a dream.

    Nice change of subject.

    You will try absolutely anything to attempt to pretend I wasn't 50 years an engineer

    Yep. It's quite easy to demonstrate that you didn't spend 50 years as
    an engineer. Your last job at Forward Innovations ended in Sept 2014.
    In order to have worked as an engineer for 50 years, your first
    engineering job should have started in:
    2014 - 50 = 1964
    However, the same resume shows that your first job started in Jan
    1984:
    <https://www.linkedin.com/in/tom-kunich-22012/details/experience/>
    Where did you work as an engineer during the missing 20 years? Why
    aren't they on your resume? The only clue is that Jay discovered that
    you had worked at BCC in "Engineering Support" which means that you
    supported engineers in some capacity.

    Berkeley Computer Corporation (BCC)
    The company name was Berkeley Computer Corporation, not Company. It
    existed from 1969 to 1972. I wouldn't mention BCC except that Jay
    discovered a document showing your name on a BCC document. See
    document page 27 (distribution list) under "Engineering Support": <http://bitsavers.trailing-edge.com/pdf/bcc/originals/Admin/BCC_A-11.pdf>
    At this time, this is the only evidence of your employment at any of
    the companies you have mentioned that were not on your LinkedIn
    resume.

    You were born in 1944. To have worked as an engineer in 1964, you
    would have been:
    1964 - 1944 = 20
    years old. Allowing 4 years for your service in the USAF and 1 year
    to obtain an engineering education, you would need to have started
    working as an engineer at age = 15. That's truly amazing and quite
    improbable.

    while you had only a very short term as a QC engineer and pissed off everyone so much that they fired you and wouldn't even acjknowledge that you worked for them.

    Ummm... I was never a QC engineer. Besides changing topic, it might
    help if you kept track of the people you are pissing off.

    I was an electronics engineer NOT because I read out so many libraries. I was an engineer because I was actually curious about things from a very young age.

    At about the same time, I was curious about sex, but that didn't make
    me a sexpert.

    I didn't go to college to AVOID something. I went into the Air Force because I wanted to learn things new.

    I've tried to explain what happened at least twice. I won't do it a
    third time. If you can't find the articles, please let me know and
    I'll post a link.

    After I got out of the Air Force, I continued and while you were trying to finish the manual on how to change ink jet printer cartridges,

    I've written user and service manuals for some of the equipment I've
    helped design. However, I've never designed a printer ink cartridge
    and therefore have not written a manual showing how to install a
    cartridge. However, I have answered some printer related questions in sci.electronics.repair mostly on laser printers: <https://groups.google.com/g/sci.electronics.repair/search?q=printer+author%3AJeff+author%3ALiebermann>

    I read every single Intel manual down to the slightest derail and knew that an Intell 8008 could control a mechanical device performing a complex control job and then later realize that the latest 8080 was pin comatible and simply by changing the clock
    speed could perform many additional jobs with the same instrument merely by adding additional dimensions of movement.

    <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intel_8080>
    "It (the 8080) first appeared in April 1974 and is an extended and
    enhanced variant of the earlier 8008 design, although without binary compatibility."
    It doesn't make much sense to be pin for pin compatible with the 8008
    unless it was also binary compatible.

    Again and again you show your true ignorance.

    I'll admit that I don't know much about the 8008 and 8080. At about
    the same time as the 8080, the marine radios I helped design used
    Fairchild 3870 CPU's.

    Why doesn't it EVER make you stop and think what you look like?

    Why does what I do in front of the bathroom mirror interest you? In
    that context, you seem rather weird.

    John Slocomb's analysis of historicsl events shows that aven in his 90's he is curious and learning. That at least shows to me that they probably misclassified him when he enterred the service and should have at least put him in a more technical trade.
    Jet engine mechanics probably.

    Whatever...


    --
    Jeff Liebermann jeffl@cruzio.com
    PO Box 272 http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
    Ben Lomond CA 95005-0272
    Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jeff Liebermann@21:1/5 to All on Fri Dec 27 18:59:51 2024
    On Fri, 27 Dec 2024 23:43:21 GMT, cyclintom <cyclintom@yahoo.com>
    wrote:

    Trump made 138% of the electors voting for Harris.

    How did Trump get more votes than there were electors? 100% would be
    him getting all the votes. Did he pack the ballots with his own votes
    to make it come out with more votes than electors? Does "made" mean
    that Trump made those extra votes or electors?

    Well, ok. I did misinterpret what you wrote a little. You probably
    intended to type 38%. However, that would be rather useless. Nobody
    wants to know what percentage of the losers vote the winner had
    obtained. They want the percentage of the total votes that each
    candidate received.


    --
    Jeff Liebermann jeffl@cruzio.com
    PO Box 272 http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
    Ben Lomond CA 95005-0272
    Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)