• =?UTF-8?B?UkU6IFJlOiBSRTogUmU6IFJFOiBSZTogUkU6IFJlOiBUb20ncyBkZW1vbnMgY

    From =?UTF-8?B?Y3ljbGludG9t?=@21:1/5 to All on Tue Dec 24 18:11:05 2024
    On Tue Dec 24 13:03:29 2024 zen cycle wrote:

    At no time did you post any proof of a 75/25 split.

    and that ass Liebermann showed that he cannot do simple arithmetic.

    Jeffs calculations were correct.

    Why don't you use his garbage and claim it is correct?

    Still waiting for you to show work that proves 312/226 is 75/25


    Your right, I should have said 62/38. You are one of the world biggest losers, but then your postings constantly during working hours proved that long ago.Your fear that your employer might find out about you is halarius,
    .

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From AMuzi@21:1/5 to cyclintom on Tue Dec 24 12:36:06 2024
    On 12/24/2024 12:11 PM, cyclintom wrote:
    On Tue Dec 24 13:03:29 2024 zen cycle wrote:

    At no time did you post any proof of a 75/25 split.

    > and that ass Liebermann showed that he cannot do simple arithmetic.

    Jeffs calculations were correct.

    > Why don't you use his garbage and claim it is correct?

    Still waiting for you to show work that proves 312/226 is 75/25


    Your right, I should have said 62/38. You are one of the world biggest losers, but then your postings constantly during working hours proved that long ago.Your fear that your employer might find out about you is halarius,
    .

    75/25 is just wrong.
    62/38 is no better.

    570 electoral votes 2024* 312 to 226.
    That's 58 to 42

    https://www.reuters.com/graphics/USA-ELECTION/RESULTS/zjpqnemxwvx/president/


    Popular vote of 155,211,283 went 77,301,997 to 75,017,626.
    That's 49.8 to 48.3 (plus minor candidates)

    https://www.cookpolitical.com/vote-tracker/2024/electoral-college


    *Electors have not yet actually voted.

    --
    Andrew Muzi
    am@yellowjersey.org
    Open every day since 1 April, 1971

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Zen Cycle@21:1/5 to cyclintom on Thu Dec 26 08:52:18 2024
    On 12/24/2024 1:11 PM, cyclintom wrote:
    On Tue Dec 24 13:03:29 2024 zen cycle wrote:

    At no time did you post any proof of a 75/25 split.

    > and that ass Liebermann showed that he cannot do simple arithmetic.

    Jeffs calculations were correct.

    > Why don't you use his garbage and claim it is correct?

    Still waiting for you to show work that proves 312/226 is 75/25


    Your right, I should have said 62/38.

    Which is still wrong

    You are one of the world biggest losers, but then your postings constantly during working hours proved that long ago.

    And yet, here I am, ten years later in the same company, with raises,
    bonuses, and promotions that tack with a productive independent contriburot.

    Your fear that your employer might find out about you is halarius,

    I have no fear of that, and your claim is in and of itself hilarious.


    .


    --
    Add xx to reply

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From =?UTF-8?B?Y3ljbGludG9t?=@21:1/5 to All on Fri Dec 27 17:16:24 2024
    On Tue Dec 24 12:57:35 2024 zen cycle wrote:
    On 12/24/2024 12:24 PM, cyclintom wrote:
    On Tue Dec 24 12:04:43 2024 zen cycle wrote:
    On 12/24/2024 11:20 AM, cyclintom wrote:
    On Mon Dec 23 06:50:01 2024 zen cycle wrote:
    On 12/21/2024 5:12 PM, cyclintom wrote:
    On Sun Dec 8 23:40:19 2024 zen cycle wrote:
    7

    I was never in the military


    Then what makes you think that you know anything about it?

    oh, gee, I don't know, maybe because my father was in the army for 22 >>>> years and I spent the first 18 years of my life living on military bases >>>> all over the world? IOW, I spent a lot more time in my life living a >>>> military life than you did.

    Shall we consider everything you were never involved in but claim to be >>>> an expert on?

    Is this another of you fake news that Shadow is an MD?

    No, it's another case of you being proven wrong yet again and refusing >>>> to admit it


    Flunky tells us that he isn't a QC manager and then gives us a fancy title that means QC manager.

    No, tommy, Regulatory Engineer doesn't mean QC manager. If I was a QC >>>> manager I would say so. Besides that a QC manager is generally a higher >>>> level position than a regulatory engineer, pays more, reports directly >>>> to the CEO, and has a great deal more authority regarding manufacturing >>>> processes and controls. So, no matter how many time _you_ try to defined >>>> my job to something that makes you feel better about your own pathetic >>>> and miserable life, you'll always be wrong, and still rather clueless. >>>>
    I'm impressed, Aren't you?

    You should be, considering your complete lack of production and
    achievement throughout your life.





    There you have it directly from the mind of the mindless.

    that sort of self-denigration really isn't good for you. Seek help.

    He know ALL about the service because his FATHER was a lifer.

    I wouldn't say _all_ about it, but I certainly have more experience in
    military life than you.

    Thos is exactly why he could get a job better than being QC. Because he already knows everything.

    Where did you get the idea I know everything? I simply know more than
    you (pretty low bar, actually).




    Your practice of abusing the English language doesn't impress anyone.

    Funny, I'm not the one with constant spelling and grammar mistakes.

    The fact is that a QC manager that plays on the newsgroups all day every day doesn't know anything.

    When I meet this QC manager you keep referencing, I'll ask them about it.

    Stop pretending you do.

    Then prove me wrong. Post a link or reference that backs up your claims. Otherwise, it's just another case of you flinging your shit on the
    keyboard and calling it facts.

    I have a million dollars in investments

    no, you don't.

    that show that your comments are really stupid.

    lol...somehow, even if you did have this magical nestegg, the mere
    existence of it would mean your claim that ollie north actually did work
    in the nixon administration.




    Funny that you find my misspellings unreadable and yet answer them.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Zen Cycle@21:1/5 to cyclintom on Fri Dec 27 13:41:55 2024
    On 12/27/2024 12:16 PM, cyclintom wrote:
    On Tue Dec 24 12:57:35 2024 zen cycle wrote:
    On 12/24/2024 12:24 PM, cyclintom wrote:
    On Tue Dec 24 12:04:43 2024 zen cycle wrote:
    On 12/24/2024 11:20 AM, cyclintom wrote:
    On Mon Dec 23 06:50:01 2024 zen cycle wrote:
    On 12/21/2024 5:12 PM, cyclintom wrote:
    On Sun Dec 8 23:40:19 2024 zen cycle wrote:
    7

    I was never in the military


    Then what makes you think that you know anything about it?

    oh, gee, I don't know, maybe because my father was in the army for 22 >>>>>> years and I spent the first 18 years of my life living on military bases >>>>>> all over the world? IOW, I spent a lot more time in my life living a >>>>>> military life than you did.

    Shall we consider everything you were never involved in but claim to be >>>>>> an expert on?

    Is this another of you fake news that Shadow is an MD?

    No, it's another case of you being proven wrong yet again and refusing >>>>>> to admit it


    Flunky tells us that he isn't a QC manager and then gives us a fancy title that means QC manager.

    No, tommy, Regulatory Engineer doesn't mean QC manager. If I was a QC >>>>>> manager I would say so. Besides that a QC manager is generally a higher >>>>>> level position than a regulatory engineer, pays more, reports directly >>>>>> to the CEO, and has a great deal more authority regarding manufacturing >>>>>> processes and controls. So, no matter how many time _you_ try to defined >>>>>> my job to something that makes you feel better about your own pathetic >>>>>> and miserable life, you'll always be wrong, and still rather clueless. >>>>>>
    I'm impressed, Aren't you?

    You should be, considering your complete lack of production and
    achievement throughout your life.





    There you have it directly from the mind of the mindless.

    that sort of self-denigration really isn't good for you. Seek help.

    He know ALL about the service because his FATHER was a lifer.

    I wouldn't say _all_ about it, but I certainly have more experience in >>>> military life than you.

    Thos is exactly why he could get a job better than being QC. Because he already knows everything.

    Where did you get the idea I know everything? I simply know more than
    you (pretty low bar, actually).




    Your practice of abusing the English language doesn't impress anyone.

    Funny, I'm not the one with constant spelling and grammar mistakes.

    The fact is that a QC manager that plays on the newsgroups all day every day doesn't know anything.

    When I meet this QC manager you keep referencing, I'll ask them about it.

    Stop pretending you do.

    Then prove me wrong. Post a link or reference that backs up your claims.
    Otherwise, it's just another case of you flinging your shit on the
    keyboard and calling it facts.

    I have a million dollars in investments

    no, you don't.

    that show that your comments are really stupid.

    lol...somehow, even if you did have this magical nestegg, the mere
    existence of it would mean your claim that ollie north actually did work
    in the nixon administration.

    Funny that you find my misspellings unreadable and yet answer them.

    Where did I write that your mistakes were unreadable?
    --
    Add xx to reply

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From =?UTF-8?B?Y3ljbGludG9t?=@21:1/5 to All on Fri Dec 27 21:36:43 2024
    On Tue Dec 24 12:52:30 2024 zen cycle wrote:

    Of course you could settle the argument by posting a reference that
    backs up your claim that North was in the Nixon administration. Good
    luck with that.





    Do you mean like you publish your real name?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From =?UTF-8?B?Y3ljbGludG9t?=@21:1/5 to All on Fri Dec 27 21:39:44 2024
    On Fri Dec 27 16:05:57 2024 Zen Cycle wrote:
    On 12/27/2024 4:01 PM, cyclintom wrote:

    There you go - Elinor Rossevelt who was the Wife of a vile racist pig, is an authority on Richard Nixon when Nixon and Truman agreed on most things.

    A less embarrassing post for you would simply to have written that you
    didn't read the link.




    I hate to break it to you, but that was not about Elinor, it was about you who cannot understand plain speach.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Zen Cycle@21:1/5 to cyclintom on Fri Dec 27 16:45:27 2024
    On 12/27/2024 4:39 PM, cyclintom wrote:
    On Fri Dec 27 16:05:57 2024 Zen Cycle wrote:
    On 12/27/2024 4:01 PM, cyclintom wrote:

    There you go - Elinor Rossevelt who was the Wife of a vile racist pig, is an authority on Richard Nixon when Nixon and Truman agreed on most things.

    A less embarrassing post for you would simply to have written that you
    didn't read the link.




    I hate to break it to you, but that was not about Elinor, it was about you who cannot understand plain speach.


    lol...I see.. the statement "Elinor Rossevelt who was the Wife of a
    vile racist pig, is an authority on Richard Nixon when Nixon and Truman
    agreed on most things" wasn't actually about Elinor Rossevelt (whoever
    that was, since the link was to Eleanor Roosevelts papers held at GWU),
    but it was actually about me....

    In otherwords, you didn't read the link...

    --
    Add xx to reply

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Zen Cycle@21:1/5 to cyclintom on Fri Dec 27 16:49:18 2024
    On 12/27/2024 4:36 PM, cyclintom wrote:
    On Tue Dec 24 12:52:30 2024 zen cycle wrote:

    Of course you could settle the argument by posting a reference that
    backs up your claim that North was in the Nixon administration. Good
    luck with that.





    Do you mean like you publish your real name?

    Please demonstrate the link between oliver north allegedly working for
    the nixon administration and me posting anonymously.

    --
    Add xx to reply

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From =?UTF-8?B?Y3ljbGludG9t?=@21:1/5 to All on Fri Dec 27 23:16:49 2024
    On Tue Dec 24 20:05:46 2024 Frank Krygowski wrote:
    On 12/24/2024 12:56 PM, cyclintom wrote:
    On Sun Dec 22 14:39:18 2024 Frank Krygowski wrote:
    On 12/22/2024 12:51 PM, cyclintom wrote:

    It's obvious your "75/25" statement was wrong. If you want me to correct >> your math in detail - that is, so you wouldn't repeat your mistake -
    you'd have to show me your work.

    You've refused to do that. I can't help you.

    I did show my work ...

    No, you did not!

    FWIW, when I was assigning projects or giving tests to students, they
    had to show their work in detail, and I graded in detail (enough that on
    one visit, ABET accreditors commented favorably on that point).

    If a student did everything right but somehow got the wrong answer by
    one tiny math mistake, they got almost full credit.

    If a student got a wrong answer and did not adequately show their work,
    they got no partial credit.

    You, Tom, earned a zero on this tiny, simple problem.




    Maybe you should ask for a show of hands of who saw 312/226?

    Why gee, I flunked Krygowski's class. But then I have over $1.1 million in investments so I guess that it really doesn't matter - who cares?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From =?UTF-8?B?Y3ljbGludG9t?=@21:1/5 to All on Fri Dec 27 23:36:04 2024
    On Tue Dec 24 12:36:06 2024 AMuzi wrote:
    On 12/24/2024 12:11 PM, cyclintom wrote:
    On Tue Dec 24 13:03:29 2024 zen cycle wrote:

    At no time did you post any proof of a 75/25 split.

    > and that ass Liebermann showed that he cannot do simple arithmetic.

    Jeffs calculations were correct.

    > Why don't you use his garbage and claim it is correct?

    Still waiting for you to show work that proves 312/226 is 75/25


    Your right, I should have said 62/38. You are one of the world biggest losers, but then your postings constantly during working hours proved that long ago.Your fear that your employer might find out about you is halarius,
    .

    75/25 is just wrong.
    62/38 is no better.

    570 electoral votes 2024* 312 to 226.
    That's 58 to 42



    That is 138% for Trump.



    https://www.reuters.com/graphics/USA-ELECTION/RESULTS/zjpqnemxwvx/president/


    Popular vote of 155,211,283 went 77,301,997 to 75,017,626.
    That's 49.8 to 48.3 (plus minor candidates)


    Popular vote was PRECISELY what the founders turned down. They could have had it but they knew that a George Washington-like character or more accurately a Franiklin D. Roosevelt could win the election EVERY TIME and become a President for life.

    It THAT your idea of an honest election?

    https://www.cookpolitical.com/vote-tracker/2024/electoral-college


    *Electors have not yet actually voted.




    That is true, but electors are supposed to BY LAW vote for their state's population's vote. This is called a Faithless Elector in some states Faithless Electors votes are nullified and replaced with other electors who keep the faith. But these people are
    so few and far between that they have never made a difference in a vote and have lost all authority within their party. This can be a very serious event.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)