| Sysop: | Amessyroom |
|---|---|
| Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
| Users: | 43 |
| Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
| Uptime: | 100:28:01 |
| Calls: | 290 |
| Files: | 905 |
| Messages: | 76,508 |
On 12/24/2024 11:52 AM, cyclintom wrote:was nesessary for the Demecrats to silence Nixon because not only did he make sense to most Americans but he promised the dawn of a brave new Republican world.
On Mon Dec 23 06:59:04 2024 zen cycle wrote:
On 12/22/2024 12:32 PM, cyclintom wrote:
On Sun Dec 15 12:56:19 2024 AMuzi wrote:
On 12/15/2024 9:52 AM, Frank Krygowski wrote:
On 12/14/2024 10:08 PM, John B. wrote:
So it is ELECTORAL votes that count now and not the
"popular vote" that
Democrats are claiming was so close. Trump won by a full
25% of electoral
votes and now you're hearing the Democrats crying that we
should eliminate
the electoral system and go with the "entirely
Democratic" popular vote.
Remember that Adolf Hitler was elected with the popular
vote which is
Nope, Hitler was appointed as Chancellor because his party
was the
largest in the Reichstag although not a majority.
EXACTLY why our founding fathers preferred the electoral
system -
More bull shit. The U.S. was originally "designed" to be a
union of
states and the Electrical system was designed to give each
state
election authority, in presidential and vice presidential
elections,
based on their population.
Not quite. The electoral college was designed so residents
of tiny states with small populations could still feel they
had influence. That might have made sense in the early days,
when former colonies still thought of themselves more as
colonists than as members of a nation.
A few weeks ago I came across an article talking about the
last great effort to do away with the electoral college. The
effort was led by Senator Birch Bayh. He convinced a huge
majority of the citizenry that it was time to dump the
anachronism. He got strong approval in the U.S. House, but
got filibustered in the Senate.
The effort continued, but according to the article, two
things prevented success. One was that some Democratic
groups (e.g. a Black political association in New York, I
think) realized that their influence within their state
would be less likely to be effective nationally; and
crucially, President Richard Nixon removed his previous
strong support. Why? Because he got pissed at Bayh for not
looking the other way at Nixon's own corruption.
There are many such examples, and many more arguments were
made, over our history.
But, as it stands, more dead people voted in recent
elections in Los Angeles County alone that there are living
souls in Wyoming (registered voter and not).
https://www.nbclosangeles.com/news/la-county-and-state-to-purge-15-million-inactive-voters-from-rolls/6866/
Decentralization of elections while observing the
sovereignty of the various States is a feature not a bug.
I really don't know what to make of Krygowski. I became an engineer on the simple ability to think. Eisenhower chose Nixon as his running mate for the very simple reason that he was probably thge finest in6ternational scholar alive at that time. It
the Democrats inner sanctom. It was plan that Nixon had nothing to do with it because it was clumbsy and ineffective, far different from what Nixon would have done. But the Slime Stream Media dumped it into Nixon's lap and hounded him into resigning. To
Therefore the Democrats had to commit election fraud on a grander scale than they had been doing. Nixon commented on that in front of Colonel Oliver North and North decided he had to know what the Democrats' plans were. So he planned and invaded
Watergate.
Now here are 50 years after the event and even from that distance Krygowski still cannot think about what happened. Even with the Nixon Foundation'z vidios of Nixon speeches showing him to have been far too smart to even try something like
Krygowski insists on being stupid because Nixon was a first class Liberal whereas Frank is and remains a stupid socialist.
dumbass, North was never involved with watergate or nixon. For that
matter he resigned under pressure from the republican leadership. It
might do you well to actually visit a library and read some history
rather than just make ludicrous claims of "reading out 3 liberries"
Inasmuch as you were in grade school at the time perhaps it is time for you to steal more of your employers time telling us what you don't know about.
Inasmuch as North was never involved with the nixon administration on
any level, perhaps it's time for you to try reading a little bit of
history before further embarrassing yourself by insisting thing that
never happened are factual.
Of course you could settle the argument by posting a reference that
backs up your claim. Good luck with that.
On 12/22/2024 12:51 PM, cyclintom wrote:
On Mon Dec 16 22:36:57 2024 Frank Krygowski wrote:
On 12/16/2024 5:59 PM, cyclintom wrote:
I will just note that Frank feels very uncomrfortable when I keep making points. According to him Trump barely won when in fact he held a 75/25 victory.
Oh, please DO show us your "75/25" computations in detail!
After telling us that you had to teach high level math it sort of stood out that you didn't correct me.
It's obvious your "75/25" statement was wrong. If you want me to correct
your math in detail - that is, so you wouldn't repeat your mistake -
you'd have to show me your work.
You've refused to do that. I can't help you.
On 12/24/2024 11:20 AM, cyclintom wrote:
On Mon Dec 23 06:50:01 2024 zen cycle wrote:
On 12/21/2024 5:12 PM, cyclintom wrote:
On Sun Dec 8 23:40:19 2024 zen cycle wrote:
7
I was never in the military
Then what makes you think that you know anything about it?
oh, gee, I don't know, maybe because my father was in the army for 22
years and I spent the first 18 years of my life living on military bases >> all over the world? IOW, I spent a lot more time in my life living a
military life than you did.
Shall we consider everything you were never involved in but claim to be
an expert on?
Is this another of you fake news that Shadow is an MD?
No, it's another case of you being proven wrong yet again and refusing
to admit it
Flunky tells us that he isn't a QC manager and then gives us a fancy title that means QC manager.
No, tommy, Regulatory Engineer doesn't mean QC manager. If I was a QC
manager I would say so. Besides that a QC manager is generally a higher
level position than a regulatory engineer, pays more, reports directly
to the CEO, and has a great deal more authority regarding manufacturing
processes and controls. So, no matter how many time _you_ try to defined >> my job to something that makes you feel better about your own pathetic
and miserable life, you'll always be wrong, and still rather clueless.
I'm impressed, Aren't you?
You should be, considering your complete lack of production and
achievement throughout your life.
There you have it directly from the mind of the mindless.
that sort of self-denigration really isn't good for you. Seek help.
He know ALL about the service because his FATHER was a lifer.
I wouldn't say _all_ about it, but I certainly have more experience in military life than you.
Thos is exactly why he could get a job better than being QC. Because he already knows everything.
Where did you get the idea I know everything? I simply know more than
you (pretty low bar, actually).
On 12/24/2024 4:11 PM, cyclintom wrote:
On Mon Dec 23 07:03:41 2024 zen cycle wrote:
On 12/21/2024 5:02 PM, cyclintom wrote:
On Tue Dec 17 16:43:20 2024 Zen Cycle wrote:
On 12/17/2024 4:02 PM, Tom Kunich wrote:
On Mon, 16 Dec 2024 17:37:06 -0500, Zen Cycle wrote:
On 12/16/2024 5:24 PM, cyclintom wrote:
On Mon Dec 9 06:26:53 2024 zen cycle wrote:
yeah, a B-52 pilot would allow an airman with no pilot training to fly
his plane...lol...sure tommy. Tell us another one....
Iws there anything in thie lifrtime where you will say something tht >>>>>>> you actually know rather than pretend to know because there isn't >>>>>>> anything that you do know?
tell us again how how 226 EC votes for harris and 312 EC votes for trump
is 25%/75?
Most people that were capable of simple arithmatic would have left that >>>>> alone. But not Flunky, he has to demonstrate why his is called Flunky. >>>>> 312/226 = 1.36 Or Trump had a 36% lead
Most people capable of simple arithmetic know that is not how one
derives percentages of a total.
DESPITE massive election fraud in
California and New York.
That's a lie
In California they stopped counting the votes in
front of the voter so that they could toss out Republican votes.
That's a lie
<snipped incoherent babble>
The man whose bewildering linkedin reference claims he's 'capable of >>>> applying complex calculus' first claims a vote result of 312/226 is
75%/25%, then claims it's 36%.
Go ahead tommy, this should be childs play for a software genius like >>>> you - show us the work of how you got 75%/25% from 312/226
Tell us all how you know what happens in California?
By paying attention t=rahter than flinging shit and claimin it's fact.
Is this more of your expert advice on friction shifting?
You could look at it that way, considering everything I've claimed about >> racing with friction shiffters has been backed up by other commenters
here, and youre the only oen making ignorant claims about it.
Besides, you still haven't shown us this magical math where a vote
result of 312/226 is 75%/25%,
We're still waiting.....
Your pretense at knowledge is worth nothing.
It has enough value to keep me gainfully employed and three different companies for ten years each - a far cry better than your record.
Paying attention?
Yes, you might want to try it some time. You might not embarrass
yourself with claims like a member of this forum is argentinian when he
is brazilian and is a retired doctor.
You stupid mother fucker felt compeled to tell me what was happening in a parking lot I ride through.
I never did that.
Then you tell me that there were dozens of jobs in Alameda
There are.
and they weren't moving part of their company out
I never made that claim.
simply because businesses are paying 40% of their profits to Gavin Loathsome.
Sure, Sure, Newsome is personally getting 40% of Abbot Industries
profits, lol....
When I applied for one of those jobs I was offered those jobs in Arizona amd Texas.
No, you weren't. You never applied for them, and you were never offered
jobs. The jobs are in Alameda, as is evidenced by the the listings themselves, which state explicitly "this position is in our Alameda facility".
You are nothiung but mouth and too much a coward to tell us your employer's name.
If you were half the brilliant reearcher you claim to be, you would have figured it out by now.
I have never met anyone as stupid as you are
I would say that's true. The vast majority of people you have met are
much much more stupid.
and your claim not to be a QC manager is even a cold blooded lie.
Is it? Why would I lie about being a QC manager when a QC manager in an organization like mine is actually a higher level position?
You were fired from HP for being incompetent and you got only someone that needed an idiot.
Forgive me for not taking employment advice from someone who couldn't
keep a job for more than a year.
Considering you spend ALL of your time on the newsgroups
ALL of it? lol....
I can only assume that they are a government supplier.
As usual, you assume incorrectly. We do provide equipment to the USAF
for aircraft refueling however. It's not the largest mart of our
business by any stretch, but it is important nonetheless.
No real company would not have fired you 10 minutes after then discovered your theft.
Ahh....I see...Government suppliers aren't real companies now...got it....lol...
On 12/24/2024 12:43 PM, cyclintom wrote:Americans but he promised the dawn of a brave new Republican world.
On Tue Dec 24 12:08:41 2024 zen cycle wrote:
On 12/24/2024 11:28 AM, cyclintom wrote:
On Sun Dec 22 11:54:45 2024 Jeff Liebermann wrote:
On Sun, 22 Dec 2024 17:32:42 GMT, cyclintom <cyclintom@yahoo.com>
wrote:
Eisenhower chose Nixon as his running mate for the very simple reason that he was probably thge finest in6ternational scholar alive at that time. It was nesessary for the Demecrats to silence Nixon because not only did he make sense to most
the Democrats inner sanctom. It was plan that Nixon had nothing to do with it because it was clumbsy and ineffective, far different from what Nixon would have done. But the Slime Stream Media dumped it into Nixon's lap and hounded him into resigning. To
Therefore the Democrats had to commit election fraud on a grander scale than they had been doing. Nixon commented on that in front of Colonel Oliver North and North decided he had to know what the Democrats' plans were. So he planned and invaded
Watergate.
Now here are 50 years after the event and even from that distance Krygowski still cannot think about what happened. Even with the Nixon Foundation'z vidios of Nixon speeches showing him to have been far too smart to even try something like
that I am wrong about mud conditions on Cull Canyon by looking at a picture from Google Earth of unknown date. Liebermann - your life is a failure because you can never learn from your mistakes.
Krygowski insists on being stupid because Nixon was a first class Liberal whereas Frank is and remains a stupid socialist.
This is closer to reality on why Eisenhower wanted Nixon as VP.
<https://www2.gwu.edu/~erpapers/mep/displaydoc.cfm?docid=erpn-ricnix> >>>> I guess(tm) this is what you consider to be an "international
scholar".
"Nixon was kept outside of the president's inner circle, yet he
developed considerable skill in foreign policy, which was demonstrated >>>> in his 1959 confrontation in Moscow with Soviet premier Nikita
Khrushchev, known as the kitchen debate."
You also screwed up your dates and events, but I don't have time to
fix that for you.
Eisenhower wanted Nixon as VP because Nixon was viewed a fervent
anti-communist because he was a member of the HUAC (House Un-American >>>> Activities Committee) and because he worked on alien registration
laws. At the time, the "Red Scare" was very much on everyone's mind. >>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_Scare#Second_Red_Scare_(1947%E2%80%931957)>
As usual, Error 404 Page Not Found.
As usual, it's just you. Both links work for me.
But Liebermann who wasn't alive at that time is willing to tell us all about it. Just like saying that the Techtronix wire fault detector is the way to measure wire length when it operates exactly like my home made device. Or that he could tell you
Sure they do.
Yup. from <https://www2.gwu.edu/~erpapers/mep/displaydoc.cfm?docid=erpn-ricnix>
"Copyright 2006. The Eleanor Roosevelt Papers. All rights reserved. "
and from
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_Scare#Second_Red_Scare_(1947%E2%80%931957)>
"Second Red Scare (1947?1957)
Main article: McCarthyism"
You're the only one who can't open Jeffs links.
They work for me, too. And I suspect they work for everyone but Tom. :-/
On 12/24/2024 11:50 AM, cyclintom wrote:
On Sun Dec 22 11:50:20 2024 AMuzi wrote:
Lt Col Oliver North was a commissioned as a lieutenant in
1968, awarded a Bronze Star for action in Viet Nam in 1969,
and was commanding officer at a base in Okinawa (1969~1974)
during the Watergate caper in 1972.
As I remember it...
Those words should be a warning to Tom.
On 12/27/2024 4:08 PM, cyclintom wrote:
On Tue Dec 24 19:56:56 2024 Frank Krygowski wrote:
As usual, Jeff's link opened immediately for me. Damn, Tom, your
incompetence knows no bounds!
I use Bit Defender which is the best antivirus in the world. You're not smart enough to protect yourself from the world around you. Don't tell me whose is incompetent since plainly you are.
It's not the AV program that's the problem.
PEBCAK
On 12/24/2024 11:57 AM, cyclintom wrote:
yup, claims of being able to apply complex calculus algorithms while
claiming 312/226 is 75/25
and all you have is a lousy PE that isn't worth the paper it's printed on. Engineers engineer things. Fools believe that assigning things to a class from textbooks written by real engineers makes them engineers.
On 12/23/2024 2:40 PM, cyclintom wrote:
On Mon Dec 23 06:55:38 2024 zen cycle wrote:
On 12/22/2024 12:46 PM, cyclintom wrote:
It doesn't matter because yuu've told us that "what's the use of having money if you don't throw it away"?
I did? Where did I write that? What's this penchant you have for lying
about things other people have written?
You think that everyone here didn't see you write words to that effect?
I'm sure no one here saw me write anything even remotely similar to that.
It sure must make you feel good to be a dipshit.
I dunno, you tell me how it feels to be a dipshit.
On 12/24/2024 12:54 PM, cyclintom wrote:
Where does being arrested for being just over the limit mean I'm a drunk
According to california state law
queerboy?
jutelist 1. Repeatedly accusing people of being "queer". He's a closeted queer, afraid people will find out.