| Sysop: | Amessyroom |
|---|---|
| Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
| Users: | 40 |
| Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
| Uptime: | 12:50:25 |
| Calls: | 291 |
| Files: | 910 |
| Messages: | 76,474 |
On Sun Dec 8 23:42:25 2024 zen cycle wrote:
On 12/8/2024 11:10 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:
On 12/8/2024 7:35 PM, Jeff Liebermann wrote:
On Sun, 8 Dec 2024 22:46:45 -0000 (UTC), Tom Kunich
<cyclintom@yahoo.com> wrote:
Tell us Liebermann, why did you spend 6 years in college to get a 4 year >>>>> degree? You told us it was to get antidraft status.
Close. It was to obtain a draft deferment. There's no such thing as
"antidraft" unless you're referring to someone opposed to the draft.
There were some other reasons why it took so long, but the deferment
was the major motivation. For example, I had a part time job for all
of the first 5 years and worked full time during two summers. There
was also a problem getting into classes required for graduation. The
colleges were overflowing with students doing the same thing. Seniors
had priority for obtaining seats. I had to take some unrelated
classes (i.e. tractor driving and tractor mechanics) in order to have
enough units to obtain a deferment and later try to catch up when
seats in my major became available. At one point, I was drafted and
went as far as getting a pre-induction physical, but was able to
convince the draft board that I should be allowed to stay in school.
So after all that time
in school you learned nothing at all
Who are you to judge what I've learned? You didn't graduate from high
school and therefore didn't have any college experience. By your own
criteria, you're not qualified to judge anything with which you
haven't personally experienced.
and exited it with nothing more than
the analog radio knowledge you had before going to college from your >>>>> interesst in citizen's band radios.
Nice word salad. Impressing sounding terms, but nothing intelligible.
Bend over in front of Flunky and say "Please".
You're probably expecting me to get angry and react to that comment.
Being angry makes you happy, so I'll have no part of that.
I'll just note that Tom has been stuck in high rant mode for several
days now. I wonder what's triggered him. Did another crank arm fall off? >>> Did Janet Yellen refuse his phone consultation? Did Trump pass him over
for a Cabinet position yet again? ;-)
his wife took away his booze money
And yet you tell us that you go out drinking with your "buddies"
(read queers).
On Sun Dec 8 23:40:19 2024 zen cycle wrote:
7
I was never in the military
Then what makes you think that you know anything about it?
Is this another of you fake news that Shadow is an MD?
Flunky tells us that he isn't a QC manager and then gives us a fancy title that means QC manager.
I'm impressed, Aren't you?
On Sat Dec 14 20:55:23 2024 Frank Krygowski wrote:
On 12/14/2024 6:19 PM, Tom Kunich wrote:
On Sat, 14 Dec 2024 14:31:09 -0500, Frank Krygowski wrote:
On 12/14/2024 2:12 PM, Tom Kunich wrote:
On Sun, 08 Dec 2024 23:10:41 -0500, Frank Krygowski wrote:
I'll just note that Tom has been stuck in high rant mode for several >>>>>> days now. I wonder what's triggered him. Did another crank arm fall >>>>>> off?
Did Janet Yellen refuse his phone consultation? Did Trump pass him >>>>>> over for a Cabinet position yet again? ;-)
Poor little Frank, with Biden's inflation eating iunto his retirement >>>>> he finds himself not wanted at Youngstown. Too woke. The world changes >>>>> but not Krygowski. Socialism is out of fashion.
:-) Last night I paid some bills via the internet. I was pleased to see >>>> that the state teacher's retirement system gave us an extra bonus check >>>> yesterday. Let me know if you need a loan, Tom.
So even your state teachers retirement system is happy that Trump was
elected. They would NOT have done that if the hyena was elected.
I'm shaking my head. No matter which way facts and figures come out, you
try to paint everything as evidence that your particular politics are
infallible.
"Frank's going broke and it's because of Biden." "Oops, Frank's doing
well... um, but it's because of Trump."
Ah well. At least I'm not the guy who lost money during the Obama years,
when everyone's investments but Tom's soared.
More invention from the man who would be Jobst.
On Sun Dec 15 06:44:42 2024 zen cycle wrote:
On 12/14/2024 6:19 PM, Tom Kunich wrote:
On Sat, 14 Dec 2024 14:31:09 -0500, Frank Krygowski wrote:
On 12/14/2024 2:12 PM, Tom Kunich wrote:
On Sun, 08 Dec 2024 23:10:41 -0500, Frank Krygowski wrote:
I'll just note that Tom has been stuck in high rant mode for several >>>>>> days now. I wonder what's triggered him. Did another crank arm fall >>>>>> off?
Did Janet Yellen refuse his phone consultation? Did Trump pass him >>>>>> over for a Cabinet position yet again? ;-)
Poor little Frank, with Biden's inflation eating iunto his retirement >>>>> he finds himself not wanted at Youngstown. Too woke. The world changes >>>>> but not Krygowski. Socialism is out of fashion.
:-) Last night I paid some bills via the internet. I was pleased to see >>>> that the state teacher's retirement system gave us an extra bonus check >>>> yesterday. Let me know if you need a loan, Tom.
So even your state teachers retirement system is happy that Trump was
elected. They would NOT have done that if the hyena was elected.
I made $50,000 last month alone
lol...sure ya did, sparky...
and presently I have all of my high growth
investments out and stable interest paying investments in. Next month I
won't even notice that I gave my brothers $30,000 each.
It doesn't matter because yuu've told us that "what's the use of having money if you don't throw it away"?
On Tue Dec 17 16:43:20 2024 Zen Cycle wrote:
On 12/17/2024 4:02 PM, Tom Kunich wrote:
On Mon, 16 Dec 2024 17:37:06 -0500, Zen Cycle wrote:
On 12/16/2024 5:24 PM, cyclintom wrote:
On Mon Dec 9 06:26:53 2024 zen cycle wrote:
yeah, a B-52 pilot would allow an airman with no pilot training to fly >>>>>> his plane...lol...sure tommy. Tell us another one....
Iws there anything in thie lifrtime where you will say something tht >>>>> you actually know rather than pretend to know because there isn't
anything that you do know?
tell us again how how 226 EC votes for harris and 312 EC votes for trump >>>> is 25%/75?
Most people that were capable of simple arithmatic would have left that
alone. But not Flunky, he has to demonstrate why his is called Flunky.
312/226 = 1.36 Or Trump had a 36% lead
Most people capable of simple arithmetic know that is not how one
derives percentages of a total.
DESPITE massive election fraud in
California and New York.
That's a lie
In California they stopped counting the votes in
front of the voter so that they could toss out Republican votes.
That's a lie
<snipped incoherent babble>
The man whose bewildering linkedin reference claims he's 'capable of
applying complex calculus' first claims a vote result of 312/226 is
75%/25%, then claims it's 36%.
Go ahead tommy, this should be childs play for a software genius like
you - show us the work of how you got 75%/25% from 312/226
Tell us all how you know what happens in California?
Is this more of your expert advice on friction shifting?
On Sun Dec 15 12:56:19 2024 AMuzi wrote:
On 12/15/2024 9:52 AM, Frank Krygowski wrote:
On 12/14/2024 10:08 PM, John B. wrote:
So it is ELECTORAL votes that count now and not the
"popular vote" that
Democrats are claiming was so close. Trump won by a full
25% of electoral
votes and now you're hearing the Democrats crying that we
should eliminate
the electoral system and go with the "entirely
Democratic" popular vote.
Remember that Adolf Hitler was elected with the popular
vote which is
Nope, Hitler was appointed as Chancellor because his party
was the
largest in the Reichstag although not a majority.
EXACTLY why our founding fathers preferred the electoral
system -
More bull shit. The U.S. was originally "designed" to be a
union of
states and the Electrical system was designed to give each
state
election authority, in presidential and vice presidential
elections,
based on their population.
Not quite. The electoral college was designed so residents
of tiny states with small populations could still feel they
had influence. That might have made sense in the early days,
when former colonies still thought of themselves more as
colonists than as members of a nation.
A few weeks ago I came across an article talking about the
last great effort to do away with the electoral college. The
effort was led by Senator Birch Bayh. He convinced a huge
majority of the citizenry that it was time to dump the
anachronism. He got strong approval in the U.S. House, but
got filibustered in the Senate.
The effort continued, but according to the article, two
things prevented success. One was that some Democratic
groups (e.g. a Black political association in New York, I
think) realized that their influence within their state
would be less likely to be effective nationally; and
crucially, President Richard Nixon removed his previous
strong support. Why? Because he got pissed at Bayh for not
looking the other way at Nixon's own corruption.
There are many such examples, and many more arguments were
made, over our history.
But, as it stands, more dead people voted in recent
elections in Los Angeles County alone that there are living
souls in Wyoming (registered voter and not).
https://www.nbclosangeles.com/news/la-county-and-state-to-purge-15-million-inactive-voters-from-rolls/6866/
Decentralization of elections while observing the
sovereignty of the various States is a feature not a bug.
I really don't know what to make of Krygowski. I became an engineer on the simple ability to think. Eisenhower chose Nixon as his running mate for the very simple reason that he was probably thge finest in6ternational scholar alive at that time. It wasnesessary for the Demecrats to silence Nixon because not only did he make sense to most Americans but he promised the dawn of a brave new Republican world.
Therefore the Democrats had to commit election fraud on a grander scale than they had been doing. Nixon commented on that in front of Colonel Oliver North and North decided he had to know what the Democrats' plans were. So he planned and invaded theDemocrats inner sanctom. It was plan that Nixon had nothing to do with it because it was clumbsy and ineffective, far different from what Nixon would have done. But the Slime Stream Media dumped it into Nixon's lap and hounded him into resigning. To that
Now here are 50 years after the event and even from that distance Krygowski still cannot think about what happened. Even with the Nixon Foundation'z vidios of Nixon speeches showing him to have been far too smart to even try something like Watergate.
Krygowski insists on being stupid because Nixon was a first class Liberal whereas Frank is and remains a stupid socialist.
On Fri Dec 27 14:38:00 2024 Jeff Liebermann wrote:
On Fri, 27 Dec 2024 21:01:24 GMT, cyclintom <cyclintom@yahoo.com>
wrote:
On Tue Dec 24 12:51:40 2024 zen cycle wrote:
Yup. from
<https://www2.gwu.edu/~erpapers/mep/displaydoc.cfm?docid=erpn-ricnix>
"Copyright
and from
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_Scare#Second_Red_Scare_(1947%E2%80%931957)>
"Second Red Scare (1947?1957)
Main article: McCarthyism"
You're the only one who can't open Jeffs links.
There you go - Elinor Rossevelt who was the Wife of a vile racist pig, is an authority on Richard Nixon when Nixon and Truman agreed on most things.
Who are you to pass judgment on whether Eleanor Roosevelt is an
authority on the McCarthy (Red Scare) era, when you are probably the
least authoritative person in rec.bicycles.tech on that era?
I think you'll find that Eleanor Roosevelt was well informed and a
very prolific writer:
<https://erpapers.columbian.gwu.edu/editorial-methods>
Her papers ended up in the Eleanor Roosevelt Papers collection at
Columbia University:
<https://erpapers.columbian.gwu.edu>
As for FDR being a racist, I could probably have some fun excavating
examples of your racist comments in rec.bicycles.tech. However,
you're not worth the time and effort.
Some light reading on FDR and race relations:
"Franklin D. Roosevelt and civil rights"
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Franklin_D._Roosevelt_and_civil_rights>
It was under FDR that the executive order prohibiting federal hiring
discrimination by race was enacted:
"Executive Order 8802"
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Executive_Order_8802>
Wrong on all counts, as usual.
Yet another case of Liebermann's attempts to be an expert by Googling politically correct crap he knows nothing about. I was born in 1944 and was in Jr. High before McCarthyism was destroyed to its roots. We had real teachers then who unlike Krygowskididn't seek approval of the herd but thought clearly about matters of the day and did not fear communism as any kind of threat to the USA. Liebermann is nothing more than the same fool who believed that he could tell me the conditions I rode in by
Liebermann, you are living on welfare because you haven't any common sense.
You could not hold a real job because you are an asshole and no one would put up with you. And now in the twilight of your life you haven't changed one iota.
On Sun Dec 22 11:54:45 2024 Jeff Liebermann wrote:but he promised the dawn of a brave new Republican world.
On Sun, 22 Dec 2024 17:32:42 GMT, cyclintom <cyclintom@yahoo.com>
wrote:
Eisenhower chose Nixon as his running mate for the very simple reason that he was probably thge finest in6ternational scholar alive at that time. It was nesessary for the Demecrats to silence Nixon because not only did he make sense to most Americans
Democrats inner sanctom. It was plan that Nixon had nothing to do with it because it was clumbsy and ineffective, far different from what Nixon would have done. But the Slime Stream Media dumped it into Nixon's lap and hounded him into resigning. To that
Therefore the Democrats had to commit election fraud on a grander scale than they had been doing. Nixon commented on that in front of Colonel Oliver North and North decided he had to know what the Democrats' plans were. So he planned and invaded the
Now here are 50 years after the event and even from that distance Krygowski still cannot think about what happened. Even with the Nixon Foundation'z vidios of Nixon speeches showing him to have been far too smart to even try something like Watergate.
Krygowski insists on being stupid because Nixon was a first class Liberal whereas Frank is and remains a stupid socialist.
This is closer to reality on why Eisenhower wanted Nixon as VP.
<https://www2.gwu.edu/~erpapers/mep/displaydoc.cfm?docid=erpn-ricnix>
I guess(tm) this is what you consider to be an "international
scholar".
"Nixon was kept outside of the president's inner circle, yet he
developed considerable skill in foreign policy, which was demonstrated
in his 1959 confrontation in Moscow with Soviet premier Nikita
Khrushchev, known as the kitchen debate."
You also screwed up your dates and events, but I don't have time to
fix that for you.
Eisenhower wanted Nixon as VP because Nixon was viewed a fervent
anti-communist because he was a member of the HUAC (House Un-American
Activities Committee) and because he worked on alien registration
laws. At the time, the "Red Scare" was very much on everyone's mind.
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_Scare#Second_Red_Scare_(1947%E2%80%931957)>
As usual, Error 404 Page Not Found.
But Liebermann who wasn't alive at that time is willing to tell us all about it. Just like saying that the Techtronix wire fault detector is the way to measure wire length when it operates exactly like my home made device. Or that he could tell youthat I am wrong about mud conditions on Cull Canyon by looking at a picture from Google Earth of unknown date. Liebermann - your life is a failure because you can never learn from your mistakes.
On Mon Dec 16 08:23:39 2024 John B. wrote:
On Sun, 15 Dec 2024 12:42:30 -0600, AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:
On 12/14/2024 9:08 PM, John B. wrote:
On Sat, 14 Dec 2024 23:38:22 -0000 (UTC), Tom Kunich
<cyclintom@yahoo.com> wrote:
On Sat, 14 Dec 2024 14:56:21 -0600, AMuzi wrote:Nope, Hitler was appointed as Chancellor because his party was the
On 12/14/2024 1:12 PM, Tom Kunich wrote:
On Sun, 08 Dec 2024 23:10:41 -0500, Frank Krygowski wrote:
On 12/8/2024 7:35 PM, Jeff Liebermann wrote:
On Sun, 8 Dec 2024 22:46:45 -0000 (UTC), Tom Kunich
<cyclintom@yahoo.com> wrote:
Tell us Liebermann, why did you spend 6 years in college to get a 4 >>>>>>>>>> year degree? You told us it was to get antidraft status.
Close. It was to obtain a draft deferment. There's no such thing as >>>>>>>>> "antidraft" unless you're referring to someone opposed to the draft. >>>>>>>>> There were some other reasons why it took so long, but the deferment >>>>>>>>> was the major motivation. For example, I had a part time job for all >>>>>>>>> of the first 5 years and worked full time during two summers. There >>>>>>>>> was also a problem getting into classes required for graduation. The >>>>>>>>> colleges were overflowing with students doing the same thing. >>>>>>>>> Seniors had priority for obtaining seats. I had to take some >>>>>>>>> unrelated classes (i.e. tractor driving and tractor mechanics) in >>>>>>>>> order to have enough units to obtain a deferment and later try to >>>>>>>>> catch up when seats in my major became available. At one point, I >>>>>>>>> was drafted and went as far as getting a pre-induction physical, but >>>>>>>>> was able to convince the draft board that I should be allowed to stay >>>>>>>>> in school.
So after all that time in school you learned nothing at all >>>>>>>>>Who are you to judge what I've learned? You didn't graduate from >>>>>>>>> high school and therefore didn't have any college experience. By >>>>>>>>> your own criteria, you're not qualified to judge anything with which >>>>>>>>> you haven't personally experienced.
and exited it with nothing more than the analog radio knowledge you >>>>>>>>>> had before going to college from your interesst in citizen's band >>>>>>>>>> radios.
Nice word salad. Impressing sounding terms, but nothing
intelligible.
Bend over in front of Flunky and say "Please".
You're probably expecting me to get angry and react to that comment. >>>>>>>>> Being angry makes you happy, so I'll have no part of that.
I'll just note that Tom has been stuck in high rant mode for several >>>>>>>> days now. I wonder what's triggered him. Did another crank arm fall >>>>>>>> off?
Did Janet Yellen refuse his phone consultation? Did Trump pass him >>>>>>>> over for a Cabinet position yet again? ;-)
Poor little Frank, with Biden's inflation eating iunto his retirement >>>>>>> he finds himself not wanted at Youngstown. Too woke. The world changes >>>>>>> but not Krygowski. Socialism is out of fashion.
You may be mistaken.
In Mahoning county, 50636 voters or 44.9% voted for Ms Harris. That's >>>>>> slightly higher than Ohio overall but not by much.
Remember, despite the failed Democrat strategy to pretend that there is >>>>> such a thing as a popular vote it is the Democrats themselves who put into
effect the "winjner takes all" strategy.
So it is ELECTORAL votes that count now and not the "popular vote" that >>>>> Democrats are claiming was so close. Trump won by a full 25% of electoral >>>>> votes and now you're hearing the Democrats crying that we should eliminate
the electoral system and go with the "entirely Democratic" popular vote. >>>>> Remember that Adolf Hitler was elected with the popular vote which is >>>>
largest in the Reichstag although not a majority.
EXACTLY why our founding fathers preferred the electoral system -
More bull shit. The U.S. was originally "designed" to be a union of
states and the Electrical system was designed to give each state
election authority, in presidential and vice presidential elections,
based on their population.
uh, the 'Electrical System' is East US, West US and Texas.
I think you meant 'electoral'.
Yes, My spell checker made another mistake :-)
--
Cheers,
John B.
This is why Flunky, Liebermann and Krygowski feel so superior to people that do not spell correctly, They can pick the proper spelling from the list provided.
You just witnessed Flunky and Liebermann making a big deal out of spelling Techtronix correctly while saying nothing about the fact that the wire fault detector they were touting worked exactly the same way my home made instrument worked and and theyclaimed wouldn't work.3
Liebermann, Flunky and Krygowski are life's losers, though at least Flunky and Krygowski managed to earn a living.
Right here in my closet I have one of the best Techtronix oscilloscopes made
and a dozen to one, neither Flunky nor Liebermann could even turn it on or use it properly.
But they can spell the name correctly and that is important, right?
On Fri Dec 27 15:53:31 2024 Zen Cycle wrote:
I recall he modified that later on to claim to have read all of the
"non-fiction" volumes
You're nothing more than a QC manager that wouldn't know how to engineer a peanut butter sandwich.
They hire QC engineers not because anyone thinks that they are good engineers but because they need someone "qualified" to sign paperwork off.
It is always entertaining to see you deny you're a "QC manager" because you know damned well what the engineering opinion of QC engineers is and you're not even that -
you're a MANAGER
who knows so little about engineering that you wouldn't read a C program with comments appended that explained what it was doing.