| Sysop: | Amessyroom |
|---|---|
| Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
| Users: | 28 |
| Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
| Uptime: | 65:48:17 |
| Calls: | 425 |
| Calls today: | 3 |
| Files: | 1,025 |
| Messages: | 91,416 |
| Posted today: | 1 |
As if this wasn't known already.
The problem is you can't push a turd down the road and even if you do,
it's still a turd
Z-friendly hipster appeal. >
Influencers flooded the web with neon-matcha green pro-Harris videos
Hey, maybe that's where the missing $25 mil disappeared to?
'How Dems secretly paid social media influencers to push Kamala Harris
during 2024 vote'
'Creators' coached on phrases, issues, themes to go 'pro-Kamala''
<https://www.wnd.com/2025/03/revealed-how-dems-secretly-paid-social-media-influencers-to-push-kamala-harris-during-2024-vote/>
'The abrupt withdrawal last year of President Joe Biden as the
Democratic presidential nominee, followed rapidly by his replacement
with Vice President Kamala Harris, irked many voters left out by the
process. Yet social media seemed to ooze with enthusiasm and Gen
Z-friendly hipster appeal.
Influencers flooded the web with neon-matcha green pro-Harris videos
synced to beats from singer Charli XCX's album "Brat" released last
year. The poppy rave videos, gushed journalists, showed that Harris
embodied the confidently independent "brat" vibe conveyed by the music. Social media pages bubbled with memes celebrating Harris as the voice of queer and black youth, in contrast with the Republican agenda of white supremacy. Digital creator Amelia Montooth, in one viral TikTok video,
kissed a woman and tried searching for pornography, actions her sketch suggested would be banned if Harris lost the election.
Harris, a career politician favored by the Democratic Party's
establishment, never quite fit the bill as an icon of activist
movements. But the sudden influencer buzz seemed to transform the stodgy former prosecutor into an icon of the cultural zeitgeist.
As it turns out, the tidal wave of enthusiasm was not entirely genuine.
Much of the content, including Montooth's videos, was quietly funded by
an elusive group of Democratic billionaires and major donors in an arrangement designed to conceal the payments from voters.
RealClearInvestigations obtained internal documents and WhatsApp
messages from Democratic strategists behind the influencer campaign. Way
to Win, one of the major donor groups behind the effort, spent more than
$9.1 million on social media influencers during the 2024 presidential election – payments revealed here for the first time. The amount was
touted in a document circulated after the election detailing the organization's accomplishments.
The effort supported over 550 content creators who published 6,644 posts across platforms, TikTok, Instagram, YouTube, Twitch, and X. Way to Win coached creators on phrases, issue areas, and key themes to "disseminate pro-Kamala content throughout the cycle," a post-election memo from the
group noted.
The look behind the curtain reveals that at least some of the
image-making around the Harris candidacy was carefully orchestrated by
the same types of covert social media marketing often used by corporate brands and special interest groups. Such campaigns provide the illusion
of organic support through the authentic appeal of trusted social media voices.
Way to Win, in internal messages, touted its work with a stable of
Democratic Party-affiliated influencers and activists, including Harry Sisson, Emily Amick, Kate Abu, and Dash Dobrofsky. The group also
overtly cultivated "non-political creators" – influencers typically
known for travel vlogs, comedic skits, or cooking recipes – and seeded
them with "positive, specific pro-Kamala content" that was "integral in setting the tone on the Internet and driving additional organic digital support." The effort often took the form of talking points that were
rapidly distributed to the in-network creators.
"Bro who is Tim Walz," said @AbeeTheArtist, one of the TikTok creators
backed by Way to Win. "He's a football coach, that's hard," the
influencer continued. "It's time for Republicans to drop out, it's not looking good for ya'll!"
In a series of internal presentations about the influencer campaign, Way
to Win emphasized its data-driven approach. "We know what messaging
works," noted Liz Jaff, a branding strategist working with Way to Win,
during a call with donors last year. She touted the use of an AI-based
focus group tool developed by Future Forward, the Harris campaign's
primary SuperPAC.
Jaff also explained the process for developing talking points that could
be inserted into organic-appearing messages and posts on social media.
"We then convey that to the influencers who take that into their own
words," continued Jaff. "We then test those videos and see what needs to
be boosted," she added, referencing paid media efforts to amplify
specific TikTok videos or favored streamers.
The lofty promises of message mastery, however, often fell short. Way to
Win directly financed a series of clunky YouTube shows and liberal
identity politics-oriented social media skits designed to bring voters
out to support the Harris campaign and Democrats more broadly. There's
little evidence that such measures moved any significant numbers of
voters during an election in which Democrats lost historic levels of
support from key constituency groups – the youth vote, Latinos, and
black men swung significantly to Donald Trump last year, upending
decades of voting patterns.
Ilana Glazer, a comedian who starred in the Comedy Central show Broad
City, received Way to Win funding for a series of election videos called "Microdosing Democracy," in which she half-heartedly endorsed Harris as
she lighted a spliff of marijuana. Another TikTok and Instagram series
backed by the donors, called "Gaydar," featured interviews quizzing
people on the streets of New York City about gay culture trivia with
little election-related content.
Way to Win also funded a caravan with an inflatable IUD to Philadelphia, Washington, D.C., Raleigh, St. Louis, and other locations. The tour,
which featured content creators producing posts along the way, was
designed to bring attention to claims that Trump would ban contraceptive devices.
In an apparent attempt to boost Harris' support among black men, Way to
Win directly funded a series of YouTube interview-style talk shows
called Watering Hole Media.
"I heard a brother say to me, 'Man, I didn't know I was going to be
excited when Kamala was selected,'" said Jeff Johnson, a managing
director with the lobbying firm Actum LLC who worked as a host for the Watering Hole Mediaseries "Tap In." "One brother said, 'I'm not even
fully sure why,'" continued Johnson. "No, seriously, he said, 'When I
look at her, though, she reminds me of my aunt,' and I said yes, so
there is this communal piece."
The discussion, taped at the Democratic National Convention in Chicago
last August, buzzed about the "through line" from the Black Panthers to
the Nation of Islam to Harris' nomination, suggesting her candidacy represented another moment in radical black politics.
The Way to Win-sponsored media group sponsored many similar discussions attempting to buoy the Harris candidacy with appeals to racial identity politics.
Despite the well-funded efforts, few tuned in. The seven video programs produced at the DNC collectively garnered fewer than 1,000 views. One
video had fewer than 40 viewers.
Questions have mounted over the campaign spending decisions from Harris
and her supporting organizations. The Harris campaign and her SuperPAC
spent over $1.5 billion in the last months of the campaign, with much of
the money flowing to consultants and media advertising. Alex Cooper, who hosted Harris for an interview on her "Call Her Daddy" podcast, was
baffled about why the campaign spent about $100,000 on a "cardboard" temporary studio set that "wasn't that nice." Others have raised similar concerns about payments to Oprah Winfrey's production firm.
"Our 2024 creator program reached key audiences with nearly a billion
views, but there's more to do, and we're applying lessons from last
cycle," a Way to Win spokesperson said in a statement to RCI.
"Sometimes in presidential campaigns, there are times when there aren't
any cost controls," observed Mike Mikus, a Democratic strategist in Pennsylvania. "The biggest question is whether they had any empirical evidence that this TikTok messaging would work."
The payments occupy a hazy area of election law. Way to Win structured
the funds through nonprofit corporations that paid various influencer
talent agencies – firms such as Palette Management and Vocal Media. The money was not listed in Federal Election Commission disclosure portals
that show political funds spent during the campaign.
While television or radio ads require disclaimers showing the groups responsible for paying for the advertisements, there are no equivalent mandates for TikTok stars or Instagram personalities that receive
payment to promote election-related content. Despite some attempts to
reform election transparency regulations, minimal progress has been
made. The FEC has deadlocked over attempts to form new rules to govern
the influencer space, leaving the entire medium virtually lawless
regarding campaign cash.
Way to Win operates several entities and corporations, most of which do
not disclose donors. The group did not respond to a request for comment
for more information in this regard. However, the cache of documents
about the influencer campaign pointed to some clues. Way to Win hosted a series of donor-only events in San Francisco and Washington, D.C., with representatives of the Open Society Foundation, the charity backed by billionaire investor George Soros. OSF did not respond to a request for comment.
Democrats are hardly alone in payola for influencers. Republican
campaigns have spent several hundred thousand dollars on similar social
media marketing agencies that tout the ability to seed content with
popular accounts on X and TikTok.
But the attempted reach and spending of the pro-Kamala Harris 2024
effort is unprecedented. For Way to Win, the group justified the
spending sprees as the only way to compete with pro-Trump voices and
popular podcasts, such as Joe Rogan, which the Harris campaign eschewed.
"Our goal this year was to combat conservative content domination on Instagram and TikTok. We did that," Way to Win claimed in a triumphant
memo to donors after the election.
"Had more Americans gotten their media from Instagram and TikTok," the December memo argued, "Kamala Harris would be the next President of the United States.'
"a425couple" wrote in message
news:cb_GP.1505435$OrR5.1147630@fx18.iad...
On 3/31/25 16:43, John Smyth wrote:
'How Dems secretly paid social media influencers to push Kamala
Harris during 2024 vote'
---------------------------- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Propaganda_techniques
The emphasis on emotional instead of intelligent content shows what
the Dem leaders really think of their followers.
"a425couple" wrote in message news:cb_GP.1505435$OrR5.1147630@fx18.iad...
On 3/31/25 16:43, John Smyth wrote:
'How Dems secretly paid social media influencers to push Kamala Harris
during 2024 vote'
---------------------------- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Propaganda_techniques
The emphasis on emotional instead of intelligent content shows what the Dem leaders really think of their followers.
pothead wrote:
On 2025-04-02, Jim Wilkins <muratlanne@gmail.com> wrote:If the democrats would use the money for Democratic interests that
"a425couple" wrote in message
news:cb_GP.1505435$OrR5.1147630@fx18.iad...
On 3/31/25 16:43, John Smyth wrote:
'How Dems secretly paid social media influencers to push Kamala
Harris during 2024 vote'
----------------------------
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Propaganda_techniques
The emphasis on emotional instead of intelligent content shows what
the Dem leaders really think of their followers.
True.
Senator Chris Coons blurted out that Americans are idiots and
couldn't even locate Greenland on a map.
The democrats have been playing the people for suckers for decades.
Fortunately the people have finally realized this which is why their
party is circling the drain.
they fundraised it might be different. They've got a million scoops
laid out, webs to capture money but it is lining pockets. Lies are
told and a Democrat can't help his party.
That's my parting shot as a former Democrat, since 1984 until early
2025.
In 1984 I campaigned for Mondale and Ferraro. The Republicans asked
me how I would feel if I was aborted. It seemed like nonsense at the
time, but I've seen Bernie Sanders talk gleefully about aborting grown
men who they think are stupid. Not nonsense at all...
".../v]andrak|≡..." wrote in message news:m55s5oF3d1vU1@mid.individual.net...
If the democrats would use the money for Democratic interests that
they fundraised it might be different. They've got a million scoops
laid out, webs to capture money but it is lining pockets. Lies are
told and a Democrat can't help his party.
That's my parting shot as a former Democrat, since 1984 until early
2025....
-----------------------------
I would have more respect for the Dems if they helped the needy learn
to support themselves instead of rewarding them for staying "poor" (by
their definition) and dependent. But a person can't teach what they
don't know.
With their liberal arts degrees, why aren't they at least volunteering
en masse to help legal immigrants learn English?
".../v]andrak|≡..." wrote in message news:m55s5oF3d1vU1@mid.individual.net...
If the democrats would use the money for Democratic interests that they fundraised it might be different. They've got a million scoops laid
out, webs to capture money but it is lining pockets. Lies are told and
a Democrat can't help his party.
That's my parting shot as a former Democrat, since 1984 until early 2025....
On 2025-04-03 01:37:17 +0000, Jim Wilkins said:
".../v]andrak|?..." wrote in message news:m55s5oF3d1vU1@mid.individual.net...
If the democrats would use the money for Democratic interests that they
fundraised it might be different. They've got a million scoops laid
out, webs to capture money but it is lining pockets. Lies are told and
a Democrat can't help his party.
That's my parting shot as a former Democrat, since 1984 until early 2025....
Lying, rock-ribbed Republicans who have never voted for a Democrat in
their life are notorious for claiming they're "former Democrats," they
think it gives them extra credibility when they slam Democrats.
"Jim Wilkins" <muratlanne@gmail.com> wrote in >news:vskoor$3acmk$1@dont-email.me:
".../v]andrak|Γëí..." wrote in messageAh, the old Tough Love, assistance makes dependance BS myth. Fact is,
news:m55s5oF3d1vU1@mid.individual.net...
If the democrats would use the money for Democratic interests that
they fundraised it might be different. They've got a million scoops
laid out, webs to capture money but it is lining pockets. Lies are
told and a Democrat can't help his party.
That's my parting shot as a former Democrat, since 1984 until early
2025....
-----------------------------
I would have more respect for the Dems if they helped the needy learn
to support themselves instead of rewarding them for staying "poor" (by
their definition) and dependent. But a person can't teach what they
don't know.
With their liberal arts degrees, why aren't they at least volunteering
en masse to help legal immigrants learn English?
they did experiments where they just gave homeless money, and in a short
time over have had worked their way into permanent housing. They got OFF >drugs. Etc.
"Jim Wilkins" <muratlanne@gmail.com> wrote in news:vskoor$3acmk$1@dont-email.me:
".../v]andrak|Γ?í..." wrote in message news:m55s5oF3d1vU1@mid.individual.net...
If the democrats would use the money for Democratic interests that
they fundraised it might be different. They've got a million scoops
laid out, webs to capture money but it is lining pockets. Lies are
told and a Democrat can't help his party.
That's my parting shot as a former Democrat, since 1984 until early 2025....
-----------------------------
I would have more respect for the Dems if they helped the needy learn
to support themselves instead of rewarding them for staying "poor" (by their definition) and dependent. But a person can't teach what they
don't know.
With their liberal arts degrees, why aren't they at least volunteering
en masse to help legal immigrants learn English?
Ah, the old Tough Love, assistance makes dependance BS myth. Fact is,
they did experiments where they just gave homeless money, and in a short
time over have had worked their way into permanent housing. They got OFF drugs. Etc.
On 2025-04-03 01:37:17 +0000, Jim Wilkins said:
".../v]andrak|=..." wrote in message news:m55s5oF3d1vU1@mid.individual.net...
If the democrats would use the money for Democratic interests that they fundraised it might be different. They've got a million scoops laid
out, webs to capture money but it is lining pockets. Lies are told and
a Democrat can't help his party.
That's my parting shot as a former Democrat, since 1984 until early 2025....
Lying, rock-ribbed Republicans who have never voted for a Democrat in
their life are notorious for claiming they're "former Democrats," they
think it gives them extra credibility when they slam Democrats.
=?UTF-8?Q?.../v]andrak|=e2=89=a1...?= <jfwaldby@gmail.com> wrote in news:m55s5oF3d1vU1@mid.individual.net:
pothead wrote:
On 2025-04-02, Jim Wilkins <muratlanne@gmail.com> wrote:If the democrats would use the money for Democratic interests that
"a425couple" wrote in message
news:cb_GP.1505435$OrR5.1147630@fx18.iad...
On 3/31/25 16:43, John Smyth wrote:
'How Dems secretly paid social media influencers to push Kamala
Harris during 2024 vote'
----------------------------
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Propaganda_techniques
The emphasis on emotional instead of intelligent content shows what
the Dem leaders really think of their followers.
True.
Senator Chris Coons blurted out that Americans are idiots and
couldn't even locate Greenland on a map.
The democrats have been playing the people for suckers for decades.
Fortunately the people have finally realized this which is why their
party is circling the drain.
they fundraised it might be different. They've got a million scoops
laid out, webs to capture money but it is lining pockets. Lies are
told and a Democrat can't help his party.
Name names, give details.
That's my parting shot as a former Democrat, since 1984 until early
2025.
In 1984 I campaigned for Mondale and Ferraro. The Republicans asked
me how I would feel if I was aborted. It seemed like nonsense at the
time, but I've seen Bernie Sanders talk gleefully about aborting grown
men who they think are stupid. Not nonsense at all...
On Thu, 3 Apr 2025 04:56:16 -0500, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
On 2025-04-03 01:37:17 +0000, Jim Wilkins said:
".../v]andrak|?..." wrote in message news:m55s5oF3d1vU1@mid.individual.net...
If the democrats would use the money for Democratic interests that they
fundraised it might be different. They've got a million scoops laid
out, webs to capture money but it is lining pockets. Lies are told and
a Democrat can't help his party.
That's my parting shot as a former Democrat, since 1984 until early 2025....
Lying, rock-ribbed Republicans who have never voted for a Democrat in
their life are notorious for claiming they're "former Democrats," they
think it gives them extra credibility when they slam Democrats.
Extra credibility is not needed. There quite a few Democrats who are
slamming the Democrat Party.
On 2025-04-03 10:14:19 +0000, Blue Lives Matter said:
On Thu, 3 Apr 2025 04:56:16 -0500, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
On 2025-04-03 01:37:17 +0000, Jim Wilkins said:
".../v]andrak|?..." wrote in message news:m55s5oF3d1vU1@mid.individual.net...
If the democrats would use the money for Democratic interests that they >>>> fundraised it might be different. They've got a million scoops laid
out, webs to capture money but it is lining pockets. Lies are told and >>>> a Democrat can't help his party.
That's my parting shot as a former Democrat, since 1984 until early 2025....
Lying, rock-ribbed Republicans who have never voted for a Democrat in
their life are notorious for claiming they're "former Democrats," they
think it gives them extra credibility when they slam Democrats.
Extra credibility is not needed. There quite a few Democrats who are
slamming the Democrat Party.
That can happen when you're not a party of mindless robots scared to
death to step out of line like the current Trumplicans.
Baxter wrote:the
=?UTF-8?Q?.../v]andrak|=e2=89=a1...?= <jfwaldby@gmail.com> wrote in
news:m55s5oF3d1vU1@mid.individual.net:
pothead wrote:
On 2025-04-02, Jim Wilkins <muratlanne@gmail.com> wrote:If the democrats would use the money for Democratic interests that
"a425couple" wrote in message
news:cb_GP.1505435$OrR5.1147630@fx18.iad...
On 3/31/25 16:43, John Smyth wrote:
'How Dems secretly paid social media influencers to push Kamala
Harris during 2024 vote'
----------------------------
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Propaganda_techniques
The emphasis on emotional instead of intelligent content shows what
the Dem leaders really think of their followers.
True.
Senator Chris Coons blurted out that Americans are idiots and
couldn't even locate Greenland on a map.
The democrats have been playing the people for suckers for decades.
Fortunately the people have finally realized this which is why their
party is circling the drain.
they fundraised it might be different. They've got a million scoops
laid out, webs to capture money but it is lining pockets. Lies are
told and a Democrat can't help his party.
Name names, give details.
They invoke names like Chuck Schumer, Nancy Pelosi etc. on phone
messages from various phone numbers.
Once they talked about Trump having just held a rally and Democratic
leaders were in uproar about what he said. I then looked all through
the news and there was nothing about a Trump rally or the 'horrid'
things he called Democrats.
Other times they say how they just need a few more donations to seal
win and then next day you view the loss.donations
In the case of the April 1st elections, they claimed that some
would get us the seats and I come to the polls and there's a hugemargin
Democrat loss.expect
There is no transparency after the donation. This is why I can't show
you some satellite photos of Democrats misusing the money or records to
the effect.
I named names and gave some details. Therefore, Baxter, I do not
your next response to be filled with rebuke, such as Shark335 invokes
any time he is questioned.
On Thu, 3 Apr 2025 03:04:26 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
"Jim Wilkins" <muratlanne@gmail.com> wrote in >>news:vskoor$3acmk$1@dont-email.me:
".../v]andrak|Γëí..." wrote in messageAh, the old Tough Love, assistance makes dependance BS myth. Fact is,
news:m55s5oF3d1vU1@mid.individual.net...
If the democrats would use the money for Democratic interests that
they fundraised it might be different. They've got a million scoops
laid out, webs to capture money but it is lining pockets. Lies are
told and a Democrat can't help his party.
That's my parting shot as a former Democrat, since 1984 until early
2025....
-----------------------------
I would have more respect for the Dems if they helped the needy
learn to support themselves instead of rewarding them for staying
"poor" (by their definition) and dependent. But a person can't teach
what they don't know.
With their liberal arts degrees, why aren't they at least
volunteering en masse to help legal immigrants learn English?
they did experiments where they just gave homeless money, and in a
short time over have had worked their way into permanent housing.
They got OFF drugs. Etc.
Nonsense....
On 2025-04-03 13:54:59 +0000, Blue Lives Matter said:
On Thu, 3 Apr 2025 08:28:41 -0500, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
On 2025-04-03 10:14:19 +0000, Blue Lives Matter said:
On Thu, 3 Apr 2025 04:56:16 -0500, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
On 2025-04-03 01:37:17 +0000, Jim Wilkins said:
".../v]andrak|?..." wrote in message news:m55s5oF3d1vU1@mid.individual.net...
If the democrats would use the money for Democratic interests that they >>>>> fundraised it might be different. They've got a million scoops laid >>>>> out, webs to capture money but it is lining pockets. Lies are told and >>>>> a Democrat can't help his party.
That's my parting shot as a former Democrat, since 1984 until early 2025....
Lying, rock-ribbed Republicans who have never voted for a Democrat in >>>> their life are notorious for claiming they're "former Democrats," they >>>> think it gives them extra credibility when they slam Democrats.
Extra credibility is not needed. There quite a few Democrats who are
slamming the Democrat Party.
That can happen when you're not a party of mindless robots scared to
death to step out of line like the current Trumplicans.
That's coming from a fool who that Cackle Kammy's word salads made
sense because the mass media said it did.
Learn to construct a simple English sentence dipshit.
Or have you been listening to this guy too much:
"Look, having nuclear -- my uncle was a great professor and scientist
and engineer, Dr.
John Trump at MIT; good genes, very good genes, OK, very smart, the
Wharton School
of Finance, very good, very smart -- you know, if you're a conservative Republican, if I
were a liberal, if, like, OK, if I ran as a liberal Democrat, they
would say I'm one of
the smartest people anywhere in the world...it's true! -- but when
you're a conservative
Republican they try -- oh, do they do a number -- that's why I always
start off:
Went to Wharton, was a good student, went there, went there, did this,
built a fortune...
you know I have to give my like credentials all the time, because we're
a little
disadvantaged -- but you look at the nuclear deal, the thing that
really bothers me -- it
would have been so easy, and it's not as important as these lives are (nuclear is powerful;
my uncle explained that to me many, many years ago, the power and that was 35 years ago; he would explain the power of what's going to happen and he
was right -- who
would have thought?), but when you look at what's going on with the
four prisoners... now
it used to be three, now it's four -- but when it was three and even
now, I would have said
it's all in the messenger; fellas, and it is fellas because, you know,
they don't, they
haven't figured that the women are smarter right now than the men, so,
you know, it's
gonna take them about another 150 years -- but the Persians are great negotiators, the
Iranians are great negotiators, so, and they, they just killed, they
just killed us."
On Thu, 3 Apr 2025 08:28:41 -0500, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
On 2025-04-03 10:14:19 +0000, Blue Lives Matter said:
On Thu, 3 Apr 2025 04:56:16 -0500, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
On 2025-04-03 01:37:17 +0000, Jim Wilkins said:
".../v]andrak|?..." wrote in message news:m55s5oF3d1vU1@mid.individual.net...
If the democrats would use the money for Democratic interests that they >>>>> fundraised it might be different. They've got a million scoops laid >>>>> out, webs to capture money but it is lining pockets. Lies are told and >>>>> a Democrat can't help his party.
That's my parting shot as a former Democrat, since 1984 until early 2025....
Lying, rock-ribbed Republicans who have never voted for a Democrat in
their life are notorious for claiming they're "former Democrats," they >>>> think it gives them extra credibility when they slam Democrats.
Extra credibility is not needed. There quite a few Democrats who are
slamming the Democrat Party.
That can happen when you're not a party of mindless robots scared to
death to step out of line like the current Trumplicans.
That's coming from a fool who that Cackle Kammy's word salads made
sense because the mass media said it did.
In article <vsmi2f$194tt$1@dont-email.me>,
super70s@super70s.invalid says...
On 2025-04-03 13:54:59 +0000, Blue Lives Matter said:
On Thu, 3 Apr 2025 08:28:41 -0500, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
On 2025-04-03 10:14:19 +0000, Blue Lives Matter said:
On Thu, 3 Apr 2025 04:56:16 -0500, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
On 2025-04-03 01:37:17 +0000, Jim Wilkins said:
".../v]andrak|?..." wrote in message
news:m55s5oF3d1vU1@mid.individual.net...
If the democrats would use the money for Democratic interests
that they fundraised it might be different. They've got a
million scoops laid out, webs to capture money but it is lining
pockets. Lies are told and a Democrat can't help his party.
That's my parting shot as a former Democrat, since 1984 until
early 2025....
Lying, rock-ribbed Republicans who have never voted for a
Democrat in their life are notorious for claiming they're
"former Democrats," they think it gives them extra credibility
when they slam Democrats.
Extra credibility is not needed. There quite a few Democrats who
are slamming the Democrat Party.
That can happen when you're not a party of mindless robots scared
to death to step out of line like the current Trumplicans.
That's coming from a fool who that Cackle Kammy's word salads made
sense because the mass media said it did.
Learn to construct a simple English sentence dipshit.
Or have you been listening to this guy too much:
"Look, having nuclear -- my uncle was a great professor and scientist
and engineer, Dr.
John Trump at MIT; good genes, very good genes, OK, very smart, the
Wharton School
of Finance, very good, very smart -- you know, if you're a
conservative Republican, if I
were a liberal, if, like, OK, if I ran as a liberal Democrat, they
would say I'm one of
the smartest people anywhere in the world...it's true! -- but when
you're a conservative
Republican they try -- oh, do they do a number -- that's why I always
start off:
Went to Wharton, was a good student, went there, went there, did
this, built a fortune...
you know I have to give my like credentials all the time, because
we're a little
disadvantaged -- but you look at the nuclear deal, the thing that
really bothers me -- it
would have been so easy, and it's not as important as these lives are
(nuclear is powerful;
my uncle explained that to me many, many years ago, the power and
that was 35 years ago; he would explain the power of what's going to
happen and he was right -- who
would have thought?), but when you look at what's going on with the
four prisoners... now
it used to be three, now it's four -- but when it was three and even
now, I would have said
it's all in the messenger; fellas, and it is fellas because, you
know, they don't, they
haven't figured that the women are smarter right now than the men,
so, you know, it's
gonna take them about another 150 years -- but the Persians are great
negotiators, the
Iranians are great negotiators, so, and they, they just killed, they
just killed us."
No one cares.
On 2025-04-03 10:14:19 +0000, Blue Lives Matter said:
On Thu, 3 Apr 2025 04:56:16 -0500, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
On 2025-04-03 01:37:17 +0000, Jim Wilkins said:
".../v]andrak|?..." wrote in message news:m55s5oF3d1vU1@mid.individual.net...
If the democrats would use the money for Democratic interests that they >>>> fundraised it might be different. They've got a million scoops laid
out, webs to capture money but it is lining pockets. Lies are told and >>>> a Democrat can't help his party.
That's my parting shot as a former Democrat, since 1984 until early 2025....
Lying, rock-ribbed Republicans who have never voted for a Democrat in
their life are notorious for claiming they're "former Democrats," they
think it gives them extra credibility when they slam Democrats.
Extra credibility is not needed. There quite a few Democrats who are
slamming the Democrat Party.
That can happen when you're not a party of mindless robots scared to
death to step out of line like the current Trumplicans.
Baxter wrote:what
=?UTF-8?Q?.../v]andrak|=e2=89=a1...?= <jfwaldby@gmail.com> wrote in
news:m575liF9k3iU1@mid.individual.net:
Baxter wrote:
=?UTF-8?Q?.../v]andrak|=e2=89=a1...?= <jfwaldby@gmail.com> wrote in
news:m55s5oF3d1vU1@mid.individual.net:
pothead wrote:
On 2025-04-02, Jim Wilkins <muratlanne@gmail.com> wrote:
"a425couple" wrote in message
news:cb_GP.1505435$OrR5.1147630@fx18.iad...
On 3/31/25 16:43, John Smyth wrote:
'How Dems secretly paid social media influencers to push Kamala >>>>>>>> Harris during 2024 vote'
----------------------------
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Propaganda_techniques
The emphasis on emotional instead of intelligent content shows
decades.the Dem leaders really think of their followers.
True.
Senator Chris Coons blurted out that Americans are idiots and
couldn't even locate Greenland on a map.
The democrats have been playing the people for suckers for
theirFortunately the people have finally realized this which is why
scoopsparty is circling the drain.If the democrats would use the money for Democratic interests that
they fundraised it might be different. They've got a million
showthelaid out, webs to capture money but it is lining pockets. Lies are
told and a Democrat can't help his party.
Name names, give details.
They invoke names like Chuck Schumer, Nancy Pelosi etc. on phone
messages from various phone numbers.
Once they talked about Trump having just held a rally and Democratic
leaders were in uproar about what he said. I then looked all through
the news and there was nothing about a Trump rally or the 'horrid'
things he called Democrats.
Other times they say how they just need a few more donations to seal
win and then next day you view the loss.donations
In the case of the April 1st elections, they claimed that some
would get us the seats and I come to the polls and there's a hugemargin
Democrat loss.
There is no transparency after the donation. This is why I can't
toyou some satellite photos of Democrats misusing the money or records
Rebuke.the effect.expect
I named names and gave some details. Therefore, Baxter, I do not
your next response to be filled with rebuke, such as Shark335 invokes
any time he is questioned.
Who is "they"? You haven't actually cited ANY details.
You didn't say "cite" You said "name". Pussy.
Skeeter <none@none.com> wrote in news:MPG.42587bf440363805989a60@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <vsmi2f$194tt$1@dont-email.me>,
super70s@super70s.invalid says...
On 2025-04-03 13:54:59 +0000, Blue Lives Matter said:
On Thu, 3 Apr 2025 08:28:41 -0500, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
On 2025-04-03 10:14:19 +0000, Blue Lives Matter said:
On Thu, 3 Apr 2025 04:56:16 -0500, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
On 2025-04-03 01:37:17 +0000, Jim Wilkins said:
".../v]andrak|?..." wrote in message
news:m55s5oF3d1vU1@mid.individual.net...
If the democrats would use the money for Democratic interests
that they fundraised it might be different. They've got a
million scoops laid out, webs to capture money but it is lining
pockets. Lies are told and a Democrat can't help his party.
That's my parting shot as a former Democrat, since 1984 until
early 2025....
Lying, rock-ribbed Republicans who have never voted for a
Democrat in their life are notorious for claiming they're
"former Democrats," they think it gives them extra credibility
when they slam Democrats.
Extra credibility is not needed. There quite a few Democrats who
are slamming the Democrat Party.
That can happen when you're not a party of mindless robots scared
to death to step out of line like the current Trumplicans.
That's coming from a fool who that Cackle Kammy's word salads made
sense because the mass media said it did.
Learn to construct a simple English sentence dipshit.
Or have you been listening to this guy too much:
"Look, having nuclear -- my uncle was a great professor and scientist
and engineer, Dr.
John Trump at MIT; good genes, very good genes, OK, very smart, the
Wharton School
of Finance, very good, very smart -- you know, if you're a
conservative Republican, if I
were a liberal, if, like, OK, if I ran as a liberal Democrat, they
would say I'm one of
the smartest people anywhere in the world...it's true! -- but when
you're a conservative
Republican they try -- oh, do they do a number -- that's why I always
start off:
Went to Wharton, was a good student, went there, went there, did
this, built a fortune...
you know I have to give my like credentials all the time, because
we're a little
disadvantaged -- but you look at the nuclear deal, the thing that
really bothers me -- it
would have been so easy, and it's not as important as these lives are
(nuclear is powerful;
my uncle explained that to me many, many years ago, the power and
that was 35 years ago; he would explain the power of what's going to
happen and he was right -- who
would have thought?), but when you look at what's going on with the
four prisoners... now
it used to be three, now it's four -- but when it was three and even
now, I would have said
it's all in the messenger; fellas, and it is fellas because, you
know, they don't, they
haven't figured that the women are smarter right now than the men,
so, you know, it's
gonna take them about another 150 years -- but the Persians are great
negotiators, the
Iranians are great negotiators, so, and they, they just killed, they
just killed us."
No one cares.
Yeah, you've made it clear that you'd support a turnip if it meant you
were in power.
"pothead" wrote in message news:vsn0dc$1hsao$7@dont-email.me...
Actually it's the democrats who are the robots.
They almost always vote 100% as a block.
----------------------------------
Leftists accuse the opposition of their own misdeeds to preclude a rational debate they can't win.
On 2025-04-04, Jim Wilkins <muratlanne@gmail.com> wrote:
"pothead" wrote in message news:vsn0dc$1hsao$7@dont-email.me...
Actually it's the democrats who are the robots.
They almost always vote 100% as a block.
----------------------------------
Leftists accuse the opposition of their own misdeeds to preclude a rational >> debate they can't win.
Indeed.
The Russian collusion hoax
On 4/3/2025 6:45 PM, pothead wrote:
On 2025-04-04, Jim Wilkins <muratlanne@gmail.com> wrote:
"pothead" wrote in message news:vsn0dc$1hsao$7@dont-email.me...
Actually it's the democrats who are the robots.
They almost always vote 100% as a block.
----------------------------------
Leftists accuse the opposition of their own misdeeds to preclude a rational
debate they can't win.
Indeed.
The Russian collusion hoax
Not a hoax. Trump colluded with Russia in 2015-2016.