• Re: Questions Trump should ask Harris at upcoming debate

    From Baxter@21:1/5 to Jim Wilkins on Sat Sep 7 14:49:31 2024
    XPost: or.politics, ca.politics, seattle.politics
    XPost: alt.law-enforcement, sci.military.naval

    "Jim Wilkins" <muratlanne@gmail.com> wrote in news:vbhgr6$1ccgl$1@dont-email.me:

    "a425couple" wrote in message news:9tJCO.43877$b8hf.20468@fx41.iad...

    Why are you campaigning on a promise to lower prices on Day One of
    your presidency if you and the president can take action right now?

    That's a mis-statement of what she actually promised

    ---------------------------------------

    If they actually gave us the benefits they would lose the value of
    campaign promises. It's like the carrot permanently dangling in front
    of a donkey to motivate it.


    But somehow that doesn't apply to tRump?

    Hypocracy thy name is "Jim Wilkins"

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mittens Romney@21:1/5 to Baxter on Mon Sep 23 13:06:26 2024
    XPost: or.politics, ca.politics, seattle.politics
    XPost: alt.law-enforcement, sci.military.naval

    Baxter wrote:
    ---------------------------------------

    If they actually gave us the benefits they would lose the value of
    campaign promises. It's like the carrot permanently dangling in front
    of a donkey to motivate it.


    But somehow that doesn't apply to tRump?


    The reality of CmmmieLa:

    You knew their Marxist agenda was not going to stop with drug prices,

    Hell no, they want to control ALL our food too!

    Next stop on the clown car - Venezuela, USA:

    https://x.com/RobertMSterling/status/1824840348008391127

    @RobertMSterling
    People need to stop overreacting about Kamala’s plan to reduce food inflation, as if it would lead to communism, mass starvation, and the
    end of America.

    I worked in M&A in the food industry. Here’s a step-by-step summary of
    what would actually happen:

    1. The government announces that grocery retailers aren’t allowed to
    raise prices.

    2. Grocery stores, which operate on 1-2% net margins, can’t survive if
    their suppliers raise prices. So the government announces that food
    producers (Kraft Heinz, ConAgra, Tyson, Hormel, et. al.) also aren’t
    allowed to raise prices.

    3. Not all grocery stores are created equal. Stores in lower-income
    areas make less money than those in higher-income areas, as the former disproportionately sell lower-margin prepackaged foods (“center of the store”) instead of higher-margin fresh products like meat (“perimeter of the store”). Because stores in lower-income areas aren’t able to cover overhead (remember, even if their wholesale costs are fixed, their
    labor, utilities, insurance, and other operating expenses aren’t fixed… yet), grocery chains start to shut them down. Food deserts in rural
    areas and in low-income urban areas alike become worse.

    4. Meanwhile, margins for food producers are also quickly eroding. Their primary costs (ingredients, energy, and labor) aren’t fixed, and their shrinking gross profits leave less cash flow available to cover
    overhead, maintain facilities, and reinvest in additional production
    capacity.

    5. Grocery chains, which have finite shelf space, start to repurpose
    their stores (those they didn’t have to shut down, I should say) to sell
    more non-price-controlled items—everything from nutrition supplements to kitchenware to apparel—and less price-controlled food products. Your
    local Kroger or Safeway starts to look and feel more like a Walmart.

    6. Food producers stop making products with lower margins. Grocery chain
    start competing with each other to secure inventory. Since they can’t
    compete by offering stronger prices (remember, producers aren’t allowed
    to raise prices here, and, even if they could, grocery chains no longer
    have the gross profit to bear price increases), they compete on things
    like payment terms.

    7. Small grocery chains start to shut down entirely, or get sold to
    larger chains like Kroger. In addition to not being able to cover fixed
    costs, a major reason for this is because they can no longer reliably
    secure delivery of products, due to producers prioritizing sales to
    larger customers, which are able to leverage their stronger balance
    sheets to offer superior payment terms.

    8. Smaller food producers—which typically sell via distributors, rather
    than directly to grocery chains—start to go out of business. Because
    these producers have an additional step their value chains, and because
    they have lower volumes over which to spread their fixed costs, their
    cost structure is inherently disadvantaged compared to major food
    producers. When grocery stores aren’t able to raise prices, cutting
    product costs becomes all the more important, and deprioritizing
    purchases from smaller producers is an easy way to do so.

    9. As supply chains break down, lines start to form outside grocery
    stores every morning. Cities assign police officers to patrol store
    parking lots, and food producers draft contingency plans to assign armed escorts to delivery trucks.

    10. The federal government announces a program to issue block grants for
    states to purchase and operate shuttered grocery stores. The USDA also
    seizes closed-down production facilities.

    11. The government announces that prices for all key food costs—corn,
    wheat, cattle, energy, etc.—are also now fixed, to stop “profiteers”
    from gouging the now-government-operated food industry.

    12. Shockingly, the government struggles to operate one of the most
    complex industries on the planet. The entire food supply chain starts imploding.

    13. Communism, mass starvation, and the end of America quickly ensue.

    Hey wait a second...????
    --
    ⛨ 🥐🥖🗼🤪

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From a425couple@21:1/5 to All on Fri Sep 6 13:19:16 2024
    XPost: or.politics, ca.politics, seattle.politics
    XPost: alt.law-enforcement, sci.military.naval

    from https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2024/sep/5/questions-trump-should-ask-harris-at-upcoming-deba/?utm_source=newsshowcase&utm_medium=gnews&utm_campaign=CDAQxpSN9K3ezs0lGPH5yN31_5TIlwEqKggAIhBcERswRnPnLkaJ3_gLN8OaKhQICiIQXBEbMEZz5y5Gid_4CzfDmg&utm_
    content=rundown

    Questions Trump should ask Harris at upcoming debate
    Donald Trump and Kamala Harris debate illustration by Greg Groesch / The Washington Times

    Commentary
    By Scott Walker - Thursday, September 5, 2024
    OPINION:

    Former President Donald Trump should ask Vice President Kamala Harris
    these questions at the upcoming debate:

    Do you still support “Bidenomics”? The typical family is paying nearly
    $900 more per month than in January 2021, when President Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris took office, to live at approximately the same
    level they were at the time. Overall, prices are up 20%. Gas is up about
    $1.25 per gallon in Wisconsin from four years ago. Housing is up nearly
    30%. If you still support Bidenomics, how much worse will it get if we
    have four more years of it?

    Why are you campaigning on a promise to lower prices on Day One of your presidency if you and the president can take action right now? You are
    the vice president of the United States. Lower taxes, less government
    spending, reductions in bureaucratic red tape and increased domestic
    energy production helped lower prices in the four years before you were
    in office. Why would voters not want a new president who would help
    lower prices again? And why would they believe that you can do it when
    you haven’t done so in your more than three and a half years in office?

    Why are the problems with border security worse than they were four
    years ago? Mr. Biden appointed you as the point person on illegal
    immigration. Why did the Biden-Harris administration undo so many of the positive reforms enacted by the prior administration that slowed down
    illegal border crossing?

    Why did you oppose the construction of a wall along the southern border
    but now support it? When you ran for president, you called construction
    of the wall a “medieval vanity project.” In April 2017, you said that it was a “stupid use of money” and pledged to “block any funding for it.” And in February 2020, you wrote on social media that Mr. Trump’s border
    wall was a “complete waste of money and won’t make us any safer.” It sounds like the change in your position is based more on the polling in battleground states such as Arizona and Nevada than a shift in policy positions.

    Do you still support the withdrawal of U.S. troops from Afghanistan? You
    said that you were the last one in the room with Mr. Biden when the
    decision was made that ultimately led to the death of 13 American
    service members.

    Why did you support a ban on fracking? In 2020, you said, “There’s no question I’m in favor of banning fracking.” Now that Pennsylvania is a
    key state, you seem to be changing your position on this important
    issue. Greater energy production at home helped us keep prices
    reasonable during our term in office. Fuel costs have increased during
    the Biden-Harris administration.

    Do you believe that killing an unborn baby just before birth should be
    legal? What, if any, laws would you support that would protect the life
    of an unborn baby who can feel pain? Do you believe it should be legal
    for someone to kill a baby hours after he or she is born? If not, why
    should it be legal hours before it is born?

    Why do you support forcing us all to drive expensive electric vehicles?
    In the Senate, you were one of five original co-sponsors of the
    Zero-Emission Vehicles Act of 2019. That bill would require automobile manufacturers to sell only zero-emission cars and trucks by 2040. This
    would put the price of a vehicle out of reach of the typical American.

    Then Mr. Trump should turn to the camera and ask the American people
    this simple question: “Are you better off today than you were four years
    ago before COVID?” He should continue: “The answer for most Americans
    will be an overwhelming no. Prices are up, the border is less secure and
    many have real public safety concerns. All of that, and more, can get
    much better if we elect a true change candidate.

    “Many of you have supported me in the past. For that, I am thankful.
    Others have not. You may not like my style or some of my posts on social
    media. Electing a president, however, is not a popularity contest. It is
    about electing a leader who will enact policies to protect our country
    and citizens.”

    ”Some of my critics claim that I will do outrageous things in the next
    four years. Why would I not have done them during my first term if that
    were true? They are purely scare tactics meant to distract you from the
    truth that life was better for most Americans when I was in office than
    it has been since Mr. Biden and Ms. Harris took office. That is why I
    ask for your vote — to make America great again!”

    • Scott Walker is president of Young America’s Foundation and served as
    the 45th governor of Wisconsin from 2011 to 2019.


    Copyright © 2024 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint
    permission.

    Please read our comment policy before commenting.


    Click to Read More and View Comments

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)