• Look Who's Really Behind Pro-Palestinian Protests at the DNC

    From a425couple@21:1/5 to All on Mon Aug 19 09:49:51 2024
    XPost: or.politics, soc.history.war.misc, sci.military.naval
    XPost: alt.law-enforcement, seattle.politics

    from https://www.newsweek.com/look-whos-really-behind-pro-palestinian-protests-dnc-opinion-1939959

    Look Who's Really Behind Pro-Palestinian Protests at the DNC | Opinion Published Aug 16, 2024 at 5:27 AM EDT
    Updated Aug 16, 2024 at 10:36 AM EDT

    01:01
    Biden Admin Wants Supreme Court To Let Americans Sue Palestinian Leaders
    By Naftali Balanson
    COO of NGO Monitor
    229
    As delegates arrive in Chicago for the Democratic National Convention
    (DNC) starting Monday, they will be met by anti-Israel demonstrators
    seeking to interrupt the proceedings and dominate the conversation. The demonstrations are not a spontaneous expression of democracy but a well-orchestrated hate march led by NGOs with shady funding.

    A coalition of nearly one hundred organizations is planning what they
    are calling the March on the DNC, which will focus on vilifying Israel, accusing it of genocide and war crimes in Gaza, and trying to undermine
    U.S. government support for the only democracy in the Middle East. Amid
    an explosive rise in antisemitism and attacks on American Jews and
    Jewish communities since Hamas' brutal Oct. 7 assault, this march, too,
    will likely be filled with hate, lies, and carry a high potential for
    violence.

    Participating in this march are many NGOs with deep ties to extremist
    programs, and some with links to known terrorist networks. These NGOs
    have received millions of dollars in funding, yet generally lack
    financial transparency and push an agenda that is actively contributing
    to antisemitism and hate in the United States. Their actions have
    serious implications for Jewish-American communities and pose a
    significant threat to American society and national security.

    At George Washington University
    A flag is flown at the pro-Palestinian camp at George Washington
    University, on May 2, in Washington, D.C. JASON FIELDS
    Samidoun, a key member of this coalition, is a prime example. It is an
    arm of the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP), a
    designated terrorist organization in the U.S., and has been banned by
    Germany, France, and Israel. Samidoun actively advocates for "armed
    resistance" against Israel, and has publicly praised the Oct. 7 attacks, essentially glorifying unspeakable atrocities that triggered nearly a
    year of war. Samidoun has been a leader of antisemitic and pro-terror
    activity across North America, including on campuses, since Oct 7. Their activities have included distribution of propaganda that celebrates
    violence against Jews and Israelis, and they have been linked to
    instances of harassment and intimidation directed at Jewish students.
    Such open support for violence is not only dangerous—it is a direct
    threat to peace and security globally.

    Another troubling example of participating organizations is Students for Justice in Palestine (SJP). On Oct. 12, 2023, only days after the
    burning, raping, mutilation, kidnapping and killing of Jews in southern
    Israel, SJP claimed, "This is what it means to Free Palestine: not just
    slogans and rallies, but armed confrontation with the oppressors." Subsequently, SJP chapters at Brandeis, Columbia, George Washington, and Rutgers were suspended for promoting intimidation and violence against
    Jews. SJP's actions on other campuses across the country have led to an environment of fear and hostility for Jewish students, further fueling divisions and hatred in academic spaces. In many instances, SJP's
    actions have also infringed upon freedom of speech and movement for
    Jewish students, silencing their voices and marginalizing them within
    their own academic communities.

    Jewish Voices for Peace (JVP) and CODEPINK also play significant roles.
    Both groups amplify harmful antisemitic tropes, masking their bigotry
    under the guise of political activism. JVP, for instance, refers to
    itself as the "Jewish wing" of the Palestinian solidarity movement and
    exploits its "Jewish" identity as a shield against criticism. CODEPINK, meanwhile, has engaged in campaigns that depict Israel and its
    supporters in deeply negative, dehumanizing ways, further contributing
    to the spread of antisemitism. In the aftermath of the brutal Hamas
    massacre in October 2023, CODEPINK referred to the "resistance of Palestinians," highlighting their alignment with extremist ideologies
    and their complicity in spreading hate and division.

    Sign up for Newsletter
    NEWSLETTER
    The Debate
    Two Views, One Story
    Deep conversations between people with completely different political
    and social perspectives.
    Enter your email address


    I want to receive special offers and promotions from Newsweek
    By clicking on SIGN ME UP, you agree to Newsweek's Terms of Use &
    Privacy Policy.
    You may unsubscribe at any time.
    READ MORE
    Seeds of Today's Middle East Disaster Were Sown by the CIA | Opinion
    More U.S. Forces in the Middle East? Here We Go Again | Opinion
    Abuse of Palestinians in Israel's Prison System Must End | Opinion
    Despite the documented cases of antisemitic incidents, these NGOs
    continue to receive significant funding. However, their financial
    operations lack transparency and raise serious concerns about the
    potential misuse of funds, and sources of funding—particularly in light
    of rising fears that hostile nations like Russia and Iran could be using
    these channels to interfere in U.S. politics.

    In fact, the director of national intelligence in the Biden
    administration, Avril Haines, recently said, "We have observed actors
    tied to Iran's government posing as activists online, seeking to
    encourage protests, and even providing financial support to protesters."
    This raises serious alarms about the potential for such funds to be used
    to influence domestic issues and U.S. elections, supporting people and
    policies that promote extremism and violence rather than legitimate
    advocacy efforts. This lack of transparency is not just an ethical
    concern—it poses a real danger as it obscures the true intentions and
    actions of these groups.

    By aligning with and supporting organizations that glorify violence,
    this coalition is actively fueling the cycle of hatred and conflict in
    the Middle East. Their actions undermine any genuine efforts toward
    peace and stability, making it harder to achieve lasting solutions to
    the region's challenges. Instead of fostering understanding and
    cooperation, these groups are driving a wedge between communities, both internationally and here at home.

    Policymakers, donors, and the public must recognize the dangerous
    implications of backing and working with groups that sympathize with and contribute to violence and hatred, especially in the context of an
    unparalleled rise in antisemitism in the U.S. This would be an
    appropriate time for leaders and members of the Democratic Party to
    distance themselves from these views and the planned protests. This is imperative if the party and its supporters want to demonstrate a
    commitment to fighting antisemitism and extremism.

    It is also crucial to withdraw support from these NGOs, as they are not champions of peace, dialogue, and mutual understanding.

    Naftali Balanson is COO of NGO Monitor (www.ngo-monitor.org), a
    Jerusalem-based research institute.

    The views expressed in this article are the writer's own.

    Request Reprint & Licensing Submit Correction View Editorial Guidelines
    About the writer
    Naftali Balanson


    To read how Newsweek uses AI as a newsroom tool, click here.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)