• Re: The iphone 16 will be my next phone

    From Alan@21:1/5 to John Hill on Sat Sep 14 07:05:38 2024
    On 2024-09-13 23:56, John Hill wrote:
    On 14 Sep 2024 at 03:52:14 BST, "Alan" <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

    On 2024-09-13 08:09, Andrew wrote:
    Your Name wrote on Thu, 12 Sep 2024 18:31:02 +1200 :

    We were talking about phones with batteries which will last 6-7 days. >>>>> Which of these will do that?

    Any phone, laptop, etc. battery can last for months ... just turn them >>>> off! :-p (Or at least as "off" as they can go.)

    Unfortunately, "Your Name" has never taken a college Physics class.
    Nor Chemistry. Nor Logic.

    There are two fundamental metrics for "battery life" which people confuse. >>> a. In-use battery life
    b. Long-term battery life
    Bearing in mind that the latter drastically degrades the former.

    Facts to note which the proponents of Apple's crappy batteries never seem >>> to understand are that all the tests they tout - are on very new batteries. >>>
    None of the tests those who support Apple's crappy batteries are of
    batteries that are a year or two old - which would be the mean of any phone >>> in our hands today (give or take) assuming a four-year average life.

    That means, essentially, put bluntly, all the test they tout are rubbish. >>> The test that matters is a test when the battery is at the half life of the >>> phone, which, if we assume four years lifetimes, then test it at 2 years. >>>
    The crappy batteries used in iPhones will degrade sooner than batteries
    twice their capacity simply because of physics - which those who tout those >>> crappy Apple iPhone batteries don't know.

    Bear in mind Apple is well aware they put crappy batteries in iPhones.
    And rest assured, Apple knows that's the major determinant of overall life. >>
    You still don't understand the difference between a "battery" and a "cell". >>
    A device that uses one D-cell battery with power draw N will run for
    just as long a device that draws 2*N.

    Now *that*, I do not understand. IMHO, as a one-time physicist, it will run twice as long.

    A cell, rechargeable on not, has a capacity of a certain number of ampere-hours. After that it must be recharged or discarded.

    If you draw twice the current you run out in half the time.

    Sorry, I left off a bit of text I meant to type.

    What I should have said was:


    A device that uses one D-cell battery with power draw N will run for
    just as long a device that draws 2*N, but has two D-cells.


    Turning to ChatGPT,
    ____________________

    The terms "cell" and "battery" are often used interchangeably, but technically, they refer to different things:

    Cell: A cell is a single electrochemical unit that converts chemical energy into electrical energy. It consists of two electrodes (an anode and a cathode)
    and an electrolyte. A common example is the AA, AAA, or D-cell batteries you might use in everyday devices. Each of these is technically a single cell.

    Battery: A battery is a collection of one or more cells connected in series or
    parallel to deliver a desired voltage and capacity. When you connect multiple cells, the combined voltage and capacity increase. For example, a car battery usually consists of multiple 2V cells combined to form a 12V battery. ____________________

    But the concept of capacity, in terms of ampere-hours, applies equally to both.

    I sincerely hope that it is unnecessary to explain "series" and "parallel"!

    It's certainly not.

    :-)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrew@21:1/5 to John Hill on Sat Sep 14 14:25:09 2024
    John Hill wrote on Sat, 14 Sep 2024 06:56:36 -0000 (UTC) :

    But the concept of capacity, in terms of ampere-hours, applies equally to both.

    I sincerely hope that it is unnecessary to explain "series" and "parallel"!

    The person you are replying to (Alan Baker) is a moron who is almost universally killfiled; so it's to be expected that basic math eludes him.

    That moron has been arguing for years that devices with similar draw and
    usage but with half the capacity will (magically, of course) go through
    fewer charge cycles than similar devices with double the initial capacity.

    He doesn't even understand there is a (rather huge!) difference between a single runtime test when new, and the concept of overall battery life.

    One is measured in hours; the other in years - and yet - it all eludes him.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From =?UTF-8?Q?J=C3=B6rg_Lorenz?=@21:1/5 to Andrew on Tue Sep 10 18:26:32 2024
    On 10.09.24 18:19, Andrew wrote:
    badgolferman wrote on Tue, 10 Sep 2024 15:44:15 -0000 (UTC) :

    FTR my killer feature would be 6-7 days of battery life.

    "Not needed and no one wants it." ~ nospam

    Not needed & nobody wants it - even tho - everyone on Android has it!

    *ROTFLSTC*

    --
    "De gustibus non est disputandum."

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Your Name@21:1/5 to badgolferman on Wed Sep 11 08:26:21 2024
    On 2024-09-10 15:44:15 +0000, badgolferman said:
    Chris wrote:

    FTR my killer feature would be 6-7 days of battery life.

    "Not needed and no one wants it." ~ nospam

    Of course, the iPhone 17, 18, 19, etc. will have better batteries
    again, so you should just wait for those.

    Apple and their battery makers are working on solid state batteries,
    which will be better again, but those won't make an appearance until at
    least the iPhone 18 and more likely well into the iPhone 20 or later
    models.

    The iPhone 732 will have a 'lifetime' battery, so why not just wait for
    that instead. ;-)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From =?UTF-8?Q?J=C3=B6rg_Lorenz?=@21:1/5 to Your Name on Wed Sep 11 06:14:18 2024
    On 10.09.24 22:26, Your Name wrote:
    On 2024-09-10 15:44:15 +0000, badgolferman said:
    Chris wrote:

    FTR my killer feature would be 6-7 days of battery life.

    "Not needed and no one wants it." ~ nospam

    Of course, the iPhone 17, 18, 19, etc. will have better batteries
    again, so you should just wait for those.

    Apple and their battery makers are working on solid state batteries,
    which will be better again, but those won't make an appearance until at
    least the iPhone 18 and more likely well into the iPhone 20 or later
    models.

    The iPhone 732 will have a 'lifetime' battery, so why not just wait for
    that instead. ;-)

    You are trolling.
    Why are you wasting your time in this NG?
    With such an identity nobody takes you serious anyway.



    --
    "De gustibus non est disputandum."

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrew@21:1/5 to badgolferman on Tue Sep 10 16:19:29 2024
    badgolferman wrote on Tue, 10 Sep 2024 15:44:15 -0000 (UTC) :

    FTR my killer feature would be 6-7 days of battery life.

    "Not needed and no one wants it." ~ nospam

    Not needed & nobody wants it - even tho - everyone on Android has it!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan Browne@21:1/5 to Chris on Wed Sep 11 17:21:19 2024
    On 2024-09-10 03:43, Chris wrote:

    ... in the 2-3 years. It'll be a nice stable model with any AI wrinkles sorted out by ios 20.

    I assume it will go quicker due to pressure and innovations in the space.


    It's funny how the "Apple so boring" brigade don't realise that Apple knows people are on 3-4 year cycles. Gone are the days when everyone got a new phone yearly. The iphone 16 is for the 12/13 owners of today and is a
    decent upgrade for them.

    I got my 13 last year so won't be upgrading until 2026.

    I have an 11 Pro. I'm good 'til at least next year.

    My SO has a 7 ... and refuses to upgrade yet.

    FTR my killer feature would be 6-7 days of battery life. New software features aren't a big deal these days, especially if they end up using more power.

    You're simply not going to get a powerful handheld device with many days
    of battery life until there is a major breakthrough in battery tech.
    (And yes there are some promising batts coming - just not yet).

    --
    "It would be a measureless disaster if Russian barbarism overlaid
    the culture and independence of the ancient States of Europe."
    Winston Churchill

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to badgolferman on Wed Sep 11 15:51:42 2024
    On 2024-09-11 15:26, badgolferman wrote:
    Chris wrote:

    You're simply not going to get a powerful handheld device with
    many days of battery life until there is a major breakthrough in
    battery tech. (And yes there are some promising batts coming -
    just not yet).

    That's why it'll be a killer feature.

    Let's hear the predictions for which mobile phone manufacturer will be
    the firtst to release an extended life battery.

    You get that Apple's iPhones rank near the very top when it comes to
    battery life...

    ...right?

    You're not so stupid that you don't understand the difference between a "battery" and a "cell"...

    ...right?

    iPhone in 5th.

    <https://m.gsmarena.com/battery-test-v2.php3>

    iPhone in 15th

    <https://www.tomsguide.com/us/smartphones-best-battery-life,review-2857.html>

    iPhone in 4th

    <https://nanoreview.net/en/phone-list/endurance-rating>

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to badgolferman on Wed Sep 11 17:35:12 2024
    On 2024-09-11 17:26, badgolferman wrote:
    Alan wrote:

    On 2024-09-11 15:26, badgolferman wrote:
    Chris wrote:

    You're simply not going to get a powerful handheld device with
    many days of battery life until there is a major breakthrough
    in battery tech. (And yes there are some promising batts
    coming - just not yet).

    That's why it'll be a killer feature.

    Let's hear the predictions for which mobile phone manufacturer will
    be the firtst to release an extended life battery.

    You get that Apple's iPhones rank near the very top when it comes to
    battery life...

    ...right?

    You're not so stupid that you don't understand the difference between
    a "battery" and a "cell"...

    ...right?

    iPhone in 5th.

    <https://m.gsmarena.com/battery-test-v2.php3>

    iPhone in 15th

    <https://www.tomsguide.com/us/smartphones-best-battery-life,review-2857.html>

    iPhone in 4th

    <https://nanoreview.net/en/phone-list/endurance-rating>


    We were talking about phones with batteries which will last 6-7 days.
    Which of these will do that?

    Yes.

    And I'm mentioning that Apple is currently up with the state of the art.

    So why would that change?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From =?UTF-8?Q?J=C3=B6rg_Lorenz?=@21:1/5 to badgolferman on Thu Sep 12 09:00:51 2024
    On 10.09.24 18:59, badgolferman wrote:
    Jörg Lorenz wrote:

    ROTFLSTC


    What does this mean? Why don't you just say the real words?

    Because even Newbies know what it means?

    Especially for you:

    https://www.acronymfinder.com/

    --
    "De gustibus non est disputandum."

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Your Name@21:1/5 to badgolferman on Thu Sep 12 18:31:02 2024
    On 2024-09-12 00:26:34 +0000, badgolferman said:
    Alan wrote:
    On 2024-09-11 15:26, badgolferman wrote:
    Chris wrote:

    You're simply not going to get a powerful handheld device with
    many days of battery life until there is a major breakthrough
    in battery tech. (And yes there are some promising batts
    coming - just not yet).

    That's why it'll be a killer feature.

    Let's hear the predictions for which mobile phone manufacturer will
    be the firtst to release an extended life battery.

    You get that Apple's iPhones rank near the very top when it comes to
    battery life...

    ...right?

    You're not so stupid that you don't understand the difference between
    a "battery" and a "cell"...

    ...right?

    iPhone in 5th.

    <https://m.gsmarena.com/battery-test-v2.php3>

    iPhone in 15th

    <https://www.tomsguide.com/us/smartphones-best-battery-life,review-2857.html>

    iPhone in 4th

    <https://nanoreview.net/en/phone-list/endurance-rating>

    We were talking about phones with batteries which will last 6-7 days.
    Which of these will do that?

    Any phone, laptop, etc. battery can last for months ... just turn them
    off! :-p (Or at least as "off" as they can go.)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrew@21:1/5 to Your Name on Fri Sep 13 15:09:15 2024
    Your Name wrote on Thu, 12 Sep 2024 18:31:02 +1200 :

    We were talking about phones with batteries which will last 6-7 days.
    Which of these will do that?

    Any phone, laptop, etc. battery can last for months ... just turn them
    off! :-p (Or at least as "off" as they can go.)

    Unfortunately, "Your Name" has never taken a college Physics class.
    Nor Chemistry. Nor Logic.

    There are two fundamental metrics for "battery life" which people confuse.
    a. In-use battery life
    b. Long-term battery life
    Bearing in mind that the latter drastically degrades the former.

    Facts to note which the proponents of Apple's crappy batteries never seem
    to understand are that all the tests they tout - are on very new batteries.

    None of the tests those who support Apple's crappy batteries are of
    batteries that are a year or two old - which would be the mean of any phone
    in our hands today (give or take) assuming a four-year average life.

    That means, essentially, put bluntly, all the test they tout are rubbish.
    The test that matters is a test when the battery is at the half life of the phone, which, if we assume four years lifetimes, then test it at 2 years.

    The crappy batteries used in iPhones will degrade sooner than batteries
    twice their capacity simply because of physics - which those who tout those crappy Apple iPhone batteries don't know.

    Bear in mind Apple is well aware they put crappy batteries in iPhones.
    And rest assured, Apple knows that's the major determinant of overall life.
    --
    Apple can't innovate but rest assured that Apple knows how to market.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Andrew on Fri Sep 13 19:52:14 2024
    On 2024-09-13 08:09, Andrew wrote:
    Your Name wrote on Thu, 12 Sep 2024 18:31:02 +1200 :

    We were talking about phones with batteries which will last 6-7 days.
    Which of these will do that?

    Any phone, laptop, etc. battery can last for months ... just turn them
    off! :-p (Or at least as "off" as they can go.)

    Unfortunately, "Your Name" has never taken a college Physics class.
    Nor Chemistry. Nor Logic.

    There are two fundamental metrics for "battery life" which people confuse.
    a. In-use battery life
    b. Long-term battery life
    Bearing in mind that the latter drastically degrades the former.

    Facts to note which the proponents of Apple's crappy batteries never seem
    to understand are that all the tests they tout - are on very new batteries.

    None of the tests those who support Apple's crappy batteries are of
    batteries that are a year or two old - which would be the mean of any phone in our hands today (give or take) assuming a four-year average life.

    That means, essentially, put bluntly, all the test they tout are rubbish.
    The test that matters is a test when the battery is at the half life of the phone, which, if we assume four years lifetimes, then test it at 2 years.

    The crappy batteries used in iPhones will degrade sooner than batteries
    twice their capacity simply because of physics - which those who tout those crappy Apple iPhone batteries don't know.

    Bear in mind Apple is well aware they put crappy batteries in iPhones.
    And rest assured, Apple knows that's the major determinant of overall life.

    You still don't understand the difference between a "battery" and a "cell".

    A device that uses one D-cell battery with power draw N will run for
    just as long a device that draws 2*N.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Hill@21:1/5 to Alan on Sat Sep 14 06:56:36 2024
    On 14 Sep 2024 at 03:52:14 BST, "Alan" <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

    On 2024-09-13 08:09, Andrew wrote:
    Your Name wrote on Thu, 12 Sep 2024 18:31:02 +1200 :

    We were talking about phones with batteries which will last 6-7 days.
    Which of these will do that?

    Any phone, laptop, etc. battery can last for months ... just turn them
    off! :-p (Or at least as "off" as they can go.)

    Unfortunately, "Your Name" has never taken a college Physics class.
    Nor Chemistry. Nor Logic.

    There are two fundamental metrics for "battery life" which people confuse. >> a. In-use battery life
    b. Long-term battery life
    Bearing in mind that the latter drastically degrades the former.

    Facts to note which the proponents of Apple's crappy batteries never seem
    to understand are that all the tests they tout - are on very new batteries. >>
    None of the tests those who support Apple's crappy batteries are of
    batteries that are a year or two old - which would be the mean of any phone >> in our hands today (give or take) assuming a four-year average life.

    That means, essentially, put bluntly, all the test they tout are rubbish.
    The test that matters is a test when the battery is at the half life of the >> phone, which, if we assume four years lifetimes, then test it at 2 years.

    The crappy batteries used in iPhones will degrade sooner than batteries
    twice their capacity simply because of physics - which those who tout those >> crappy Apple iPhone batteries don't know.

    Bear in mind Apple is well aware they put crappy batteries in iPhones.
    And rest assured, Apple knows that's the major determinant of overall life.

    You still don't understand the difference between a "battery" and a "cell".

    A device that uses one D-cell battery with power draw N will run for
    just as long a device that draws 2*N.

    Now *that*, I do not understand. IMHO, as a one-time physicist, it will run twice as long.

    A cell, rechargeable on not, has a capacity of a certain number of ampere-hours. After that it must be recharged or discarded.

    If you draw twice the current you run out in half the time.

    Turning to ChatGPT,
    ____________________

    The terms "cell" and "battery" are often used interchangeably, but
    technically, they refer to different things:

    Cell: A cell is a single electrochemical unit that converts chemical energy into electrical energy. It consists of two electrodes (an anode and a cathode) and an electrolyte. A common example is the AA, AAA, or D-cell batteries you might use in everyday devices. Each of these is technically a single cell.

    Battery: A battery is a collection of one or more cells connected in series or parallel to deliver a desired voltage and capacity. When you connect multiple cells, the combined voltage and capacity increase. For example, a car battery usually consists of multiple 2V cells combined to form a 12V battery. ____________________

    But the concept of capacity, in terms of ampere-hours, applies equally to
    both.

    I sincerely hope that it is unnecessary to explain "series" and "parallel"!

    Old John

    --
    You're not an old dog until you can't learn new tricks.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)