• Want diversity? Start with professional sports. OOOOOPS . That won't wo

    From John Smyth@21:1/5 to All on Wed May 14 19:17:59 2025
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.republicans, talk.politics.guns

    Why not start with professional basketball?
    Bwaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!

    'Want diversity? Start with professional sports.'

    <https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2025/05/want_diversity_start_with_professional_sports.html>

    'Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) are the new buzzwords of the
    day, expressing our modern woke culture and society.


    But for the next four years, DEI will DIE, but perhaps resurrect under a
    future Democrat administration.

    DEI has "DIEd" since President Donald Trump has “shut down all DEI
    offices across the federal government.”


    He accomplished this just hours after his inauguration by signing an
    executive order to eliminate these programs.

    DEI should stand for “divisive, exclusionary, and intrusive.”


    What does the woke American Psychological Association say about DEI?
    They are out of step with popular culture for using the term EDI rather
    than DEI.

    Equity, diversity, and inclusion (EDI) is a conceptual framework that
    promotes the fair treatment and full participation of all people,
    especially populations that have historically been underrepresented or
    subject to discrimination because of their background, identity,
    disability, etc.


    I prefer the acronym DIE because DEI policies could potentially place
    the wrong people in the wrong jobs, based on demographics and external
    factors rather than on merit and competence.

    Potential areas where DEI could cause people to DIE include medicine and transportation, where poor outcomes follow poor decisions.


    While DEI has been rigorously applied to educational admissions,
    military recruiting, corporate hiring, entertainment, and general career advancement, one area that seems immune to DEI considerations is
    professional sports.

    DEI sports illustration, ai


    Image via Grok

    Why do they get a pass? Why are athletes selected and judged based on
    CPA – competence, performance, and achievement – rather than
    “background, identity, disability, etc” as the psychological society recommends?

    Let’s begin with diversity in America, focusing on the racial and ethnic breakdown of the U.S. population.

    According to Data USA:

    White 58%

    Black 12%

    Hispanic 18%

    Asian 6%

    The goal of diversity is to create groups that “look like America.”

    This catchphrase is the gold standard for watchdogs like the New York
    Times, which use it in headlines describing President Joe Biden’s
    cabinet or American cities.

    To “look like America,” the racial demographics of any group must align with the percentages mentioned above. This also includes gender
    diversity of half women and half men.

    Let’s examine the New York Times corporate board of 13 members. There
    are 7 women and 6 men, a split that reflects the demographic makeup of
    America. Two of the 13 are Black, representing 15 percent, which meets
    that benchmark. However, there are no Asians or Hispanics, but instead,
    two Indians. The two former groups account for 24 percent of the
    American population, while Indian Americans represent only 1.6 percent.

    The diversity at the New York Times resembles America in its corporate
    board, but it still falls short. I wondered if the New York Times
    editorial board “looks like America,” but that’s confidential.

    I asked Grok and was told, “The New York Times does not publicly release
    a centralized directory with photos of its Editorial Board.” Perhaps
    they choose to avoid diversity scrutiny.

    Let’s shift focus to professional sports.

    Wikipedia provides a breakdown of the NBA. “In 2023 was composed of 70.4 percent black players, 17.5 percent white players, 2.2 percent Latino
    players of any race, and 0.2 percent Asian players.” This breakdown
    hardly “looks like America.”

    This data was more challenging to locate for the NFL, but Sports
    Illustrated published the breakdown in 2017: black 57 percent, white 28 percent, and black/Asian 4 percent. Hispanics comprise only 25 of the
    1,700 NFL players, just over 1 percent, far less than the 18 percent of
    the U.S. population. The NFL doesn’t “look like America,” either.

    Major League Baseball fairly closely reflects America, with 58 percent
    white, 32 percent Hispanic, 8 percent black, and 3 percent Asian. It may
    not be perfect, but it is far better than either the NFL or NBA.

    How about golf? The PGA does not resemble America, except at tony
    American country clubs. “The professional golfers on PGA Tour are overwhelmingly white, 80% white, actually, with only 11% of players
    having Asian backgrounds, 8% Latinx and 2% black.”

    Television commercials don’t “look like America,” or the U.K. for that matter, either.

    As published in Medium:

    Today Black people represent 12% of the U.S. population but are featured
    in some 40% of television ads.

    In the U.K., Black people are less than 3% of the population but are in
    37% of the commercials.

    In America, businesses in sports, media, or entertainment can operate as
    they wish. Consumers also have the freedom to choose what to read and
    watch or to seek alternatives.

    I don’t begrudge professional sports teams for selecting and promoting
    the best athletes, regardless of external characteristics. But why don’t
    they practice what they preach?

    Here is the NFL’s statement on diversity:

    The NFL is committed to building a diverse, equitable and inclusive work environment that reflects our incredibly diverse fan base. We provide an environment of mutual respect where equal employment opportunities are available to all employees and applicants without regard to ancestry,
    race, color, religion, sex, gender, gender identity, gender expression, national origin, age, disability, medical condition, marital status,
    military or veteran status, genetic information, sexual orientation, or
    other status protected by applicable federal, state, or local law.
    people from a diverse candidate pool.

    By their own reasoning, NFL players should reflect the racial
    composition of America. Are there transgender men playing in the NFL, or
    women in general? How about the disabled? Why should someone in a
    wheelchair not be able to be an NFL wide receiver? Would that be absurd?

    Why don’t professional sports receive a free pass on walking the DEI
    walk rather than just talking the DEI talk? Why don’t medical schools,
    air traffic control towers, airline cockpits, and the military have the
    same allowance to hire the most qualified for the job, just like
    professional sports teams do?

    These DEI exceptions render the entire DEI concept a form of virtue
    signaling — empty words that government agencies enforce when they can,
    while exempting organizations where such rules are ludicrous. Is it not
    logical to want the best and most competent individuals in hospitals,
    operating rooms, and airplane cockpits?

    How about following Martin Luther King, Jr.’s admonition to judge people
    by the content of their character (and abilities) rather than the color
    of their skin (or gender)? Let DEI finally DIE and rest in peace'

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From pothead@21:1/5 to John Smyth on Thu May 15 01:42:53 2025
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.republicans, talk.politics.guns

    On 2025-05-14, John Smyth <smythlejon2@hotmail.com> wrote:
    Why not start with professional basketball?
    Bwaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!

    'Want diversity? Start with professional sports.'

    <https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2025/05/want_diversity_start_with_professional_sports.html>

    'Diversity, Equity, and InclusionAnna (DEI) are the new buzzwords of the
    day, expressing our modern woke culture and society.


    But for the next four years, DEI will DIE, but perhaps resurrect under a future Democrat administration.

    DEI has "DIEd" since President Donald Trump has “shut down all DEI
    offices across the federal government.”


    He accomplished this just hours after his inauguration by signing an executive order to eliminate these programs.

    DEI should stand for “divisive, exclusionary, and intrusive.”


    What does the woke American Psychological Association say about DEI?
    They are out of step with popular culture for using the term EDI rather
    than DEI.

    Equity, diversity, and inclusion (EDI) is a conceptual framework that promotes the fair treatment and full participation of all people,
    especially populations that have historically been underrepresented or subject to discrimination because of their background, identity,
    disability, etc.


    I prefer the acronym DIE because DEI policies could potentially place
    the wrong people in the wrong jobs, based on demographics and external factors rather than on merit and competence.

    Potential areas where DEI could cause people to DIE include medicine and transportation, where poor outcomes follow poor decisions.


    While DEI has been rigorously applied to educational admissions,
    military recruiting, corporate hiring, entertainment, and general career advancement, one area that seems immune to DEI considerations is
    professional sports.

    DEI sports illustration, ai


    Image via Grok

    Why do they get a pass? Why are athletes selected and judged based on
    CPA – competence, performance, and achievement – rather than “background, identity, disability, etc” as the psychological society recommends?

    Let’s begin with diversity in America, focusing on the racial and ethnic breakdown of the U.S. population.

    According to Data USA:

    White 58%

    Black 12%

    Hispanic 18%

    Asian 6%

    The goal of diversity is to create groups that “look like America.”

    This catchphrase is the gold standard for watchdogs like the New York
    Times, which use it in headlines describing President Joe Biden’s
    cabinet or American cities.

    To “look like America,” the racial demographics of any group must align with the percentages mentioned above. This also includes gender
    diversity of half women and half men.

    Let’s examine the New York Times corporate board of 13 members. There
    are 7 women and 6 men, a split that reflects the demographic makeup of America. Two of the 13 are Black, representing 15 percent, which meets
    that benchmark. However, there are no Asians or Hispanics, but instead,
    two Indians. The two former groups account for 24 percent of the
    American population, while Indian Americans represent only 1.6 percent.

    The diversity at the New York Times resembles America in its corporate
    board, but it still falls short. I wondered if the New York Times
    editorial board “looks like America,” but that’s confidential.

    I asked Grok and was told, “The New York Times does not publicly release
    a centralized directory with photos of its Editorial Board.” Perhaps
    they choose to avoid diversity scrutiny.

    Let’s shift focus to professional sports.

    Wikipedia provides a breakdown of the NBA. “In 2023 was composed of 70.4 percent black players, 17.5 percent white players, 2.2 percent Latino
    players of any race, and 0.2 percent Asian players.” This breakdown
    hardly “looks like America.”

    This data was more challenging to locate for the NFL, but Sports
    Illustrated published the breakdown in 2017: black 57 percent, white 28 percent, and black/Asian 4 percent. Hispanics comprise only 25 of the
    1,700 NFL players, just over 1 percent, far less than the 18 percent of
    the U.S. population. The NFL doesn’t “look like America,” either.

    Major League Baseball fairly closely reflects America, with 58 percent
    white, 32 percent Hispanic, 8 percent black, and 3 percent Asian. It may
    not be perfect, but it is far better than either the NFL or NBA.

    How about golf? The PGA does not resemble America, except at tony
    American country clubs. “The professional golfers on PGA Tour are overwhelmingly white, 80% white, actually, with only 11% of players
    having Asian backgrounds, 8% Latinx and 2% black.”

    Television commercials don’t “look like America,” or the U.K. for that matter, either.

    As published in Medium:

    Today Black people represent 12% of the U.S. population but are featured
    in some 40% of television ads.

    In the U.K., Black people are less than 3% of the population but are in
    37% of the commercials.

    In America, businesses in sports, media, or entertainment can operate as
    they wish. Consumers also have the freedom to choose what to read and
    watch or to seek alternatives.

    I don’t begrudge professional sports teams for selecting and promoting
    the best athletes, regardless of external characteristics. But why don’t they practice what they preach?

    Here is the NFL’s statement on diversity:

    The NFL is committed to building a diverse, equitable and inclusive work environment that reflects our incredibly diverse fan base. We provide an environment of mutual respect where equal employment opportunities are available to all employees and applicants without regard to ancestry,
    race, color, religion, sex, gender, gender identity, gender expression, national origin, age, disability, medical condition, marital status,
    military or veteran status, genetic information, sexual orientation, or
    other status protected by applicable federal, state, or local law.
    people from a diverse candidate pool.

    By their own reasoning, NFL players should reflect the racial
    composition of America. Are there transgender men playing in the NFL, or women in general? How about the disabled? Why should someone in a
    wheelchair not be able to be an NFL wide receiver? Would that be absurd?

    Why don’t professional sports receive a free pass on walking the DEI
    walk rather than just talking the DEI talk? Why don’t medical schools,
    air traffic control towers, airline cockpits, and the military have the
    same allowance to hire the most qualified for the job, just like
    professional sports teams do?

    These DEI exceptions render the entire DEI concept a form of virtue
    signaling — empty words that government agencies enforce when they can, while exempting organizations where such rules are ludicrous. Is it not logical to want the best and most competent individuals in hospitals, operating rooms, and airplane cockpits?

    How about following Martin Luther King, Jr.’s admonition to judge people
    by the content of their character (and abilities) rather than the color
    of their skin (or gender)? Let DEI finally DIE and rest in peace'

    Interesting how DEI doesn't apply here.
    Oh well, everyone knows that white men can't jump.

    BTW this just exposes what a farce DEI is.
    Just like affirmative action was in the 60's and 70's.

    Hire the most qualified person for the job.
    A 5'1 100lb woman is not the person I would want carrying me out of
    a burning building.

    And a midget isn't a good choice for the NY Knicks basketball team.

    --
    pothead
    Liberalism Is A Mental Disease
    Treat it accordingly <https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-14512427/Doctors-reveal-symptoms-Trump-Derangement-Syndrome-tell-youve-got-it.html>

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From howie ruffe@21:1/5 to All on Thu May 15 06:03:09 2025
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.republicans, talk.politics.guns XPost: alt.politics.equality

    On 14 May 2025, pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> posted some news:1003gqt$2pkep$1@dont-email.me:

    On 2025-05-14, John Smyth <smythlejon2@hotmail.com> wrote:
    Why not start with professional basketball?
    Bwaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!

    'Want diversity? Start with professional sports.'

    <https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2025/05/want_diversity_start_ >>with_professional_sports.html>

    'Diversity, Equity, and InclusionAnna (DEI) are the new buzzwords of
    the day, expressing our modern woke culture and society.


    But for the next four years, DEI will DIE, but perhaps resurrect
    under a future Democrat administration.

    DEI has "DIEd" since President Donald Trump has “shut down all DEI
    offices across the federal government.”


    He accomplished this just hours after his inauguration by signing an
    executive order to eliminate these programs.

    DEI should stand for “divisive, exclusionary, and intrusive.”


    What does the woke American Psychological Association say about DEI?
    They are out of step with popular culture for using the term EDI
    rather than DEI.

    Equity, diversity, and inclusion (EDI) is a conceptual framework that
    promotes the fair treatment and full participation of all people,
    especially populations that have historically been underrepresented
    or subject to discrimination because of their background, identity,
    disability, etc.


    I prefer the acronym DIE because DEI policies could potentially place
    the wrong people in the wrong jobs, based on demographics and
    external factors rather than on merit and competence.

    Potential areas where DEI could cause people to DIE include medicine
    and transportation, where poor outcomes follow poor decisions.


    While DEI has been rigorously applied to educational admissions,
    military recruiting, corporate hiring, entertainment, and general
    career advancement, one area that seems immune to DEI considerations
    is professional sports.

    DEI sports illustration, ai


    Image via Grok

    Why do they get a pass? Why are athletes selected and judged based on
    CPA – competence, performance, and achievement – rather than
    “background, identity, disability, etc” as the psychological
    society recommends?

    Let’s begin with diversity in America, focusing on the racial and
    ethnic breakdown of the U.S. population.

    According to Data USA:

    White 58%

    Black 12%

    Hispanic 18%

    Asian 6%

    The goal of diversity is to create groups that “look like
    America.”

    This catchphrase is the gold standard for watchdogs like the New York
    Times, which use it in headlines describing President Joe Biden’s
    cabinet or American cities.

    To “look like America,” the racial demographics of any group must
    align with the percentages mentioned above. This also includes gender
    diversity of half women and half men.

    Let’s examine the New York Times corporate board of 13 members.
    There are 7 women and 6 men, a split that reflects the demographic
    makeup of America. Two of the 13 are Black, representing 15 percent,
    which meets that benchmark. However, there are no Asians or
    Hispanics, but instead, two Indians. The two former groups account
    for 24 percent of the American population, while Indian Americans
    represent only 1.6 percent.

    The diversity at the New York Times resembles America in its
    corporate board, but it still falls short. I wondered if the New York
    Times editorial board “looks like America,” but that’s
    confidential.

    I asked Grok and was told, “The New York Times does not publicly
    release a centralized directory with photos of its Editorial
    Board.” Perhaps they choose to avoid diversity scrutiny.

    Let’s shift focus to professional sports.

    Wikipedia provides a breakdown of the NBA. “In 2023 was composed of
    70.4 percent black players, 17.5 percent white players, 2.2 percent
    Latino players of any race, and 0.2 percent Asian players.” This
    breakdown hardly “looks like America.”

    This data was more challenging to locate for the NFL, but Sports
    Illustrated published the breakdown in 2017: black 57 percent, white
    28 percent, and black/Asian 4 percent. Hispanics comprise only 25 of
    the 1,700 NFL players, just over 1 percent, far less than the 18
    percent of the U.S. population. The NFL doesn’t “look like
    America,” either.

    Major League Baseball fairly closely reflects America, with 58
    percent white, 32 percent Hispanic, 8 percent black, and 3 percent
    Asian. It may not be perfect, but it is far better than either the
    NFL or NBA.

    How about golf? The PGA does not resemble America, except at tony
    American country clubs. “The professional golfers on PGA Tour are
    overwhelmingly white, 80% white, actually, with only 11% of players
    having Asian backgrounds, 8% Latinx and 2% black.”

    Television commercials don’t “look like America,” or the U.K.
    for that matter, either.

    As published in Medium:

    Today Black people represent 12% of the U.S. population but are
    featured in some 40% of television ads.

    In the U.K., Black people are less than 3% of the population but are
    in 37% of the commercials.

    In America, businesses in sports, media, or entertainment can operate
    as they wish. Consumers also have the freedom to choose what to read
    and watch or to seek alternatives.

    I don’t begrudge professional sports teams for selecting and
    promoting the best athletes, regardless of external characteristics.
    But why don’t they practice what they preach?

    Here is the NFL’s statement on diversity:

    The NFL is committed to building a diverse, equitable and inclusive
    work environment that reflects our incredibly diverse fan base. We
    provide an environment of mutual respect where equal employment
    opportunities are available to all employees and applicants without
    regard to ancestry, race, color, religion, sex, gender, gender
    identity, gender expression, national origin, age, disability,
    medical condition, marital status, military or veteran status,
    genetic information, sexual orientation, or other status protected by
    applicable federal, state, or local law. people from a diverse
    candidate pool.

    By their own reasoning, NFL players should reflect the racial
    composition of America. Are there transgender men playing in the NFL,
    or women in general? How about the disabled? Why should someone in a
    wheelchair not be able to be an NFL wide receiver? Would that be
    absurd?

    Why don’t professional sports receive a free pass on walking the
    DEI walk rather than just talking the DEI talk? Why don’t medical
    schools, air traffic control towers, airline cockpits, and the
    military have the same allowance to hire the most qualified for the
    job, just like professional sports teams do?

    These DEI exceptions render the entire DEI concept a form of virtue
    signaling — empty words that government agencies enforce when they
    can, while exempting organizations where such rules are ludicrous. Is
    it not logical to want the best and most competent individuals in
    hospitals, operating rooms, and airplane cockpits?

    How about following Martin Luther King, Jr.’s admonition to judge
    people by the content of their character (and abilities) rather than
    the color of their skin (or gender)? Let DEI finally DIE and rest in
    peace'

    Interesting how DEI doesn't apply here.
    Oh well, everyone knows that white men can't jump.

    BTW this just exposes what a farce DEI is.
    Just like affirmative action was in the 60's and 70's.

    Hire the most qualified person for the job.
    A 5'1 100lb woman is not the person I would want carrying me out of
    a burning building.

    And a midget isn't a good choice for the NY Knicks basketball team.

    The real kicker was when that black tranny lesbian criminal wnba doper got busted in Russia and the Biden / Harris clown show jumped into action to
    get "it" home.

    Screw all the other Americans who were locked up in Russia.

    The only reason "it" got priority was because Russia didn't want "it"
    there in the first place. The USA looked like a bunch of horses asses.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)