Sysop: | Amessyroom |
---|---|
Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
Users: | 35 |
Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
Uptime: | 29:20:05 |
Calls: | 333 |
Files: | 990 |
Messages: | 84,620 |
Organization: An antother poorly-installed InterNetNews site
Gabx wrote:
Organization: An antother poorly-installed InterNetNews site
Organization: An antother poorly-installed InterNetNews site
^ should that no be another?
Regards
Stefan
Gabx wrote:
test
My m2n is no longer working for a couple of minutes now. :-(
Have you changed something, besides TLS?
Stefan Claas wrote:
Stefan Claas wrote:
Gabx wrote:
test
My m2n is no longer working for a couple of minutes now. :-(
Have you changed something, besides TLS?
TLS this is the point,
i have sort of fuck up with nnrpd trying to make it listen to port 563
tls indipendently by innd, as documentation and best practice says.
Gabx
test
Stefan Claas wrote:
Gabx wrote:
test
My m2n is no longer working for a couple of minutes now. :-(
Have you changed something, besides TLS?
If this goes through ...
Gabx wrote:
If this goes through ...
Now my m2n is not working again, due to your changes. :-(
Before it worked again.
Stefan Claas wrote:
Why not let it only run on port 119, so that all clients
and my m2n can connect?
the norm would be to have port 119 in clear and for onion,
port 563 for tlsv1.2/1.3.
Everything else is a workaround.
Gabx wrote:Because even though I use the nnrpdflags: directive without the -S
Stefan Claas wrote:
Why not let it only run on port 119, so that all clients
and my m2n can connect?
the norm would be to have port 119 in clear and for onion,
port 563 for tlsv1.2/1.3.
Everything else is a workaround.
I think this is not correct, because TLS needs a certificate,
which can't be issued for onion addresses.
An old saying: Never change a running system ... So why not
let it work as before and use 119 for onion and clearnet
without TLS and additionally TLS for clearnet?
Stefan Claas wrote:
Gabx wrote:
Stefan Claas wrote:
Because even though I use the nnrpdflags: directive without the -SWhy not let it only run on port 119, so that all clients
and my m2n can connect?
option which stands for 'secure', 'ssl', 'tls', etc. innd continues
to offer tls on port 119
:)
the norm would be to have port 119 in clear and for onion,
port 563 for tlsv1.2/1.3.
Everything else is a workaround.
This is correct !
I think this is not correct, because TLS needs a certificate,
which can't be issued for onion addresses.
I said the above i said is correct because onion port 119 would run
on clear without letsencrypt certificates.
An old saying: Never change a running system ... So why not
we all know the sayings ....
let it work as before and use 119 for onion and clearnet
without TLS and additionally TLS for clearnet?
By the way,
i have commented all tls* options in news/inn.conf on the top of an
empty nnrpdflags directive.
Innd is a real motherf*****er.
For you would be easier a
context = ssl.create_default_context()
context.check_hostname = False
context.verify_mode = ssl.CERT_NONE
back on INND context, i can't beleave:
$ openssl s_client news.tcpreset.net:119
Connecting to 2a01:4f8:c0c:2f94::1
CONNECTED(00000003)
depth=2 C=US, O=Internet Security Research Group, CN=ISRG Root X1
verify return:1
depth=1 C=US, O=Let's Encrypt, CN=R11
verify return:1
depth=0 CN=news.tcpreset.net
verify return:1
I have asked help at the nntp community and also i wrote a mail to Ivo (paganini),
waiting for reponse.
Bonne nuit
Why not let it only run on port 119, so that all clients
and my m2n can connect?