250218 Michael wrote:

-- details of using 'f3probe' snipped --

This is good news, it confirms neither of them are counterfeit units. However, the 2nd stick appears to be defective. It takes almost 3.5 times
as long than the first stick and from what we know for no good reason.
This indicates the second stick has bad flash cells,
a bad flash controller, or both. I would return the bad stick as defective, asking for it to be replaced.

In my experience stores are box shifters. Goods In - Goods Out.
They try to buy from wholesalers with whom they have some relationship
based on price-reliability-convenience and who they hope
also apply similar criteria in their relationships up the supply chain.
Any link in this chain can go wrong and you end up with bad goods.
I don't expect them to perform QA/QC
beyond looking at the shipping labels and customs declarations.
The manufacturers may perform some actual quality checks on a sampling basis after the prototypes have been put together
and the brand reps may audit the odd production run.
I would think the rigour of such checks
is proportional to the value of the assembled items.

Yes, that's very much what one would expect of any successful retailer.
My experience with Canada Computers since 2000 -- 25 yr -- has been good : they do try not to sell anything which cb unreliable.
However, as you say, all it takes is 1 broken link in a long chain.

I tried formatting one of the sticks using Gparted + Glances.
After 10 hr while I was asleep, it had formatted 1 partition
& was clearly stalled on the 2nd : the Parted progress bar was moving to-fro, Glances reported critically high CPU I/O wait of c 25 %
& that it was writing small amounts of data to the partition every 30 sec .
I had to cancel Gparted from the root command line
& then tested the 1st partition, which allowed me to edit a file,
but was very slow at everything.

So yes, at least 1 of the sticks is unusable & probably both.
I can take/mail them back to the store & ask them to test them with Linux
& refund my CAD if they confirm they're defective.
I would expect this store to be honorable re it
& to be pleased to have someone report the problem
st they can report back to their supplier & avoid future trouble.

Frank had a useful suggestion re alternative devices,
which I will reply to separately. Your own comments thereon wb useful.

--
========================,,============================================
SUPPORT ___________//___, Philip Webb
ELECTRIC /] [] [] [] [] []| Cities Centre, University of Toronto
TRANSIT `-O----------O---' purslowatcadotinterdotnet

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Tuesday 18 February 2025 18:54:07 Greenwich Mean Time Philip Webb wrote:

So yes, at least 1 of the sticks is unusable & probably both.
I can take/mail them back to the store & ask them to test them with Linux
& refund my CAD if they confirm they're defective.

I would refrain from stating anything which could well be outside their sphere of knowledge or understanding. Hence I would not mention Linux, ext2,
gparted, or anything exotic for the average MSWindows user, beyond:

"I just cannot format these sticks - they took many, many hours and eventually failed. They are not like the previous USB sticks I bought FROM YOUR SHOP.
Can I please replace them for something more reliable AND FASTER. If need be at a higher price point."

I would expect this store to be honorable re it
& to be pleased to have someone report the problem
st they can report back to their supplier & avoid future trouble.

Frank had a useful suggestion re alternative devices,
which I will reply to separately. Your own comments thereon wb useful.

For reliable NAND flash storage on a modern PC which can make use of the
higher speeds, I wholeheartedly agree the M.2 small form factor SSD drive within a USB enclosure must be a consideration. Or one of the external SATA SSDs which are physically bigger, with a USB cable.

There are also USB enclosures (caddies), in which you can buy and install a suitable M.2 or 2.5" SATA SSD of your choice; e.g.:

https://plugable.com/products/usbc-nvme/

The SSDs come with a fast DRAM cache which accelerates transfers of smaller files, so the difference in speed from your flaky USB sticks will be very noticeable.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEXqhvaVh2ERicA8Ceseqq9sKVZxkFAme1E/8ACgkQseqq9sKV ZxkxLxAA3bhokqcHf9uKBodFxIoa7uoGoTvjsHRELLy1U6QzESzPJJWb7Jl78ZiG 3CGjYMhMl93ZSc1wG3y2p6MiL55wwMsbqkttnJisBeL4r0psJZaYYTd0JW7s8/4z cctJeMCpgUEyeA3ykjDS8bbYRjEip/O9MgS/Y0AIkhPrZiLKmSqTfLzIJ3WlS7HR 7lHHCja8q5jhzNUImWQS9Dkb2JbM93zZrErCaqO+vgON9y0W6GsicyvK5put1VxL 7WjPTbf5pNr89THiIZsgHmI0hSWj/Ky1Y7SuNS8wPRthD6Jf2B52goibgD5INeGb /ZjvI1s0NkkAc+zlIH2bGsJuq/7Eyv0yJ5iDTT5ePxepFfZQMvo0lI0/k4z3K8KX nRHd8zJyyQ1sl6egf9uUX7u02TldkTndOOQ+sH0kCrwYxOES3PqWNiL9y5lIgIWY 30r8SfsBgkwOhnY1/Jf16RFA7KRYtg9rFysBiKBEoqBL54nah90He7qPWw9sL+A8 oDyK1JdNzEbiU79u+h5iZNarh6EzN5PMUgXhpsVL1inHpYcKpVB/wI9NwB/oW/XW fQMwnw7soDi36OprpEY3mizNUrIguy3iex73xQx5YEMgDQjuFgPx1U2sZkAEtFSO iUHvfwMBjOMlt/iF5xi7paUlceAe46cNNCeAPYX0bYKYggXYZkI=
=pjmP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On 2/18/25 16:13, Michael wrote:

For reliable NAND flash storage on a modern PC which can make use of the higher speeds, I wholeheartedly agree the M.2 small form factor SSD drive within a USB enclosure must be a consideration. Or one of the external SATA SSDs which are physically bigger, with a USB cable.

I have been using a Samsung portable SSD with USB 3 connectivity for
quite some time. I used to work in an area with very limited internet
for weeks at a time and used the disk to put some media to read, watch,
or listen on it at home that I could take to my work location to use
during my time off. The transfer speed after upgrading from a standard
USB drive to the SSD was amazing and I never looked back. Of course,
there is a price increase for the increased speed.

Eric

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Am Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 12:18:30PM -0600 schrieb Dale:

Michael wrote:

I use external USB sticks a lot for critical backup files, world, /etc
and most important, /root where some of my so called scripts live. 
Reading this thread made me question even more the dependability of USB sticks.  I've read elsewhere that even some highly respected brands are heading down the road to being iffy.  So, I just bought a enclosure and
a m.2 stick.  This is what I got. 

https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0CYLDM23M

https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0DQSX3Z76

You should have announced it beforehand, so we could have given you input as usual. :) I’m sure it will work just fine as temporary storage, but don’t use it as singular backup device without, well, backup. Because I feel the urge to dampen your mood by saying that the E100 is a very very cheap model, if not the cheapest of all from any of the big named brands. It’s probably still better than sticks, I guess.

The E100 just came out, so there are no long-term experiences available yet. There has been a news item on my German hardware site on its recent release: https://www.computerbase.de/news/storage/heimlich-eingefuehrt-ssd-serie-crucial-e100-erreicht-den-markt-im-tbw-tiefflug.91090/

Google-translated to English: https://www-computerbase-de.translate.goog/news/storage/heimlich-eingefuehrt-ssd-serie-crucial-e100-erreicht-den-markt-im-tbw-tiefflug.91090/?_x_tr_sl=de&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=de&_x_tr_pto=wapp

The ghist of the article:
- It’s so low-profile there was no press announcement by the manufacturer.
- According to the article, it has a new record low for guaranteed lifetime
writes (TBW, terabytes written). The article has a nice table of
comparison with many other SSDs. The next best has more than twice the
amount.
- The (slighty harsh) comments speak of leftover recycling. The users are
hard-core gamers though, so the best is just good enough for them.

https://www.techpowerup.com/ssd-specs/crucial-e100-480-gb.d2306 mentions TLC and no DRAM, though the computerbase article speaks of QLC (which is more likely, especially given the TWB value). So don’t expect a speed miracle, especially behind USB.

Another thing to consider: don’t put it into the safe for a year without powering it up. As was explained in a previous mail, QLC uses sixteen different levels of charge inside one single flash cell. The chance of a bit flip increases the longer the SSD is powerless and charge slowly (very
slowly) dissipates. It’s hard to find exact numbers, and it’s more of a statistical question. Could be a research topic for a slow Sunday. ;-)
Also, don’t you live in a hot area?

I don’t know if an SSD does a re-charge regularly by itself, or whether you need to actually read out the cells for the controller to notice any issues. This may be another good research topic. You could simply tar the entire mounted SSD to /dev/null to read the entire payload once (without reading
the unused areas to save time):
tar cf /dev/null /path/to/filesystem/

--
Grüße | Greetings | Salut | Qapla’
Please do not share anything from, with or about me on any social network.

A circle is a round square.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEVbE9o2D2lE5fhoVsizG+tUDUMMoFAme3r24ACgkQizG+tUDU MMq+Ug/+MAimB1IAiTtcFeJhGkD8E1tEYDeSY0hYfgUbe23ylwWKDetSyHih+/Oi bAnwAyyQqO8ewsQqdRevS5jgDeKCSikqqpTMY3bQZLFOTLGIdvUO/UnVRQ8YxwPf AJFwR7V1pscvqUFPWhZIzAGeLCtXUhIsNNo0yLWr78PcLjJ067yY4W23TEzbcsI7 AOHdOTENQDrllBSOjZAExk+tZCoNdQjy7dzgSbjpLHkFLRs83liMXPZTVzAKEowW oiVAO+NCMn23PxRb6Gqi731M+ClnC5u+0NwCSaKrCWinEofT51x6XIxZUSzryPlo h6Oih4G3xN0NwYMNjnzPuyEGhmBOv3yBHYedoyvzgjOv+t1wGEq7YfzAT0I0hhHo Ge5itFD0Am/yguIltEhXdxbEy9mI5OoAw5vNOJkLodfwpTTB1A1WTHtbWqozdBQ4 mQ8bR08YKciNbUjEMmOO+JjC4pB1x0xBh6UiJO7EJX2nD8bwMsWk4CqgZ19UWL/C mHePHgfXbioDUiiNquiMMbQVJic+zze2rxWpG+9INQMDj97VtlrWT/gFR/wx26m+ IDt5EUR+b7znm6H8fIXOaJV/7TsrulcNR5GvAKkVTZ1xcgFbXpDcZgKtl9qAKW+v HNckL1u0LCjGDM1BPZP1NBu6hOpjmtw8OJtj+tTQoeVSKSOsDhc=
=DsqX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- SoupGate-Win32