• Re: [draft] need your help on the AI-DFSG general resolution prepration

    From Stefano Zacchiroli@21:1/5 to M. Zhou on Tue Feb 4 15:40:01 2025
    Hello lumin, and thanks a lot for this work.

    On Sun, Feb 02, 2025 at 12:56:59AM -0500, M. Zhou wrote:
    https://salsa.debian.org/lumin/gr-ai-dfsg
    (I turned the issues on. Feel free to open issues there)

    before discussing specific details, my first reaction (and associated
    question) is that the text is *very* long for a vote. Do you plan to
    propose that full text as what will be voted on?

    In general, I think it's better to keep a GR text short and to the
    point, and post contextual material somewhere else. That somewhere else
    can be the ensuing discussions on -project/-vote, possibly summarized in periodic messages, but can also reside in dedicated web pages like your
    repo above.

    I'm not saying this not only for "voting overhead", in particular for
    voters who will discover this only at the time of call for votes, but
    also because the longer the text is, higher are the chances that people
    will disagree with at least some of the additional information material,
    and will hence decide to vote against the GR for side reasons.

    FWIW, I also agree with Holger that you should focus on the GR option
    that you *want* to see adopted. Leave to others the burden of proposing alternative options to be added to the ballot.

    Cheers
    --
    Stefano Zacchiroli . zack@upsilon.cc . https://upsilon.cc/zack _. ^ ._
    Full professor of Computer Science o o o \/|V|\/ Télécom Paris, Polytechnic Institute of Paris o o o </> <\> Co-founder & CSO Software Heritage o o o o /\|^|/\ Mastodon: https://mastodon.xyz/@zacchiro '" V "'

    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

    iQIzBAABCAAdFiEE8ZooXsFA+JEz681OfH5Cj5NBJ5kFAmeiA5QACgkQfH5Cj5NB J5laSQ/+I0sIxOeHBAPgHcA3tLqkOJpHegZnAiG7aPfbMuHMAYJ+qGpbpiNNjq/X hPFc0AZmDEwl9kXJU4Mp3U0gna9H3yRCtGhqCsrc+3nIMpo6rhzoqaq6FmhlJn24 0uuH6SUHb4OZOppv9bLCpEHUJ49xfIMvIf82f6WuzIDgQbl8Mr2SdF1aSTASV/wM AP3rNTauan11h/nbWny58EvMb9tAb+rJwpHY+1qC8Xci5RtyjZ1nz+HVgu4jMiI3 ARKx8M1bwa9baS7yPiQp1kSaeHqaz59RutIGRIxeIgbjZSsibc+FBTjwnYGLdQwo HIE915teZxC/hVPJU1eAr1o15RVV+uB9qBYvv8zihYY/mogMy9fYv2ChuGDKo9N/ SJf6f8Z641Lc+sc9CsEp8i8mpQuF/wf45ugO0oa8x60KThh6dxwfCG9r1E/NTm5R aml3n6pcwgVUbVvD32z53Rnmm3agArQBMYtt7t9hqOUqB0uqOsllB7gHdW/v6LIE dhTXoRBuJ86gN3FtxEylTb
  • From Ross Vandegrift@21:1/5 to M. Zhou on Fri Feb 7 22:30:02 2025
    On Sun, Feb 02, 2025 at 12:56:59AM -0500, M. Zhou wrote:
    (5) what is the actionable outcome of this generaal resolution?

    Is this actually unclear? The linked text claims this issue is urgent - usually, something is urgent because some issue demands action.

    (6) is a neutral tone necessary for a proposal? I have a clear tendency throughout the texts.

    I think it's okay to reveal a preference, but the "toxic candy" term is
    rather unfortunate. You've defined the debate with terms that dismiss
    the opposing viewpoint. Could you come up with a more neutral,
    descriptive name?

    Ross

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From M. Zhou@21:1/5 to M. Zhou on Sun Apr 13 09:10:01 2025
    On Sun, 2025-02-02 at 00:56 -0500, M. Zhou wrote:

    https://salsa.debian.org/lumin/gr-ai-dfsg

    I overhauled the draft, and have split lots of rationales and background information to separate files as appendix. The current status looks like
    a release candidate to me.

    I'll further simplify the text, deleting more sentences as appropriate,
    and rephrasing redundant language, in order to further shrink its length
    while not losing key information.

    That means the remaining work is something like language polishing.
    When I'm feeling comfortable with the text length, the language, etc.,
    I'll sign and post to -vote. That moment should be very soon.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From M. Zhou@21:1/5 to M. Zhou on Mon Apr 21 02:30:01 2025
    On Sun, 2025-04-13 at 00:57 -0400, M. Zhou wrote:
    On Sun, 2025-02-02 at 00:56 -0500, M. Zhou wrote:

    https://salsa.debian.org/lumin/gr-ai-dfsg

    I signed and posted the proposal there: https://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2025/04/msg00101.html

    This is my first time to create a GR. And I just learned from https://www.debian.org/vote/howto_follow
    that we need 5 sponsors before it is open for discussion.

    Much appreciated if folks are willing to second/sponsor or
    propose something different to push this forward!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)