Sysop: | Amessyroom |
---|---|
Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
Users: | 43 |
Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
Uptime: | 104:30:17 |
Calls: | 290 |
Files: | 905 |
Messages: | 76,618 |
I'd like to get a sense of whether the following situation on riscv64 is19m, rv-osuosl-02)
just pure bad luck or if that's something that we should expect to run
into in a regular fashion:
1: gcc-14 (11d 11h 30m, rv-manda-02), graph-tool (4d 19h 33m, rv-osuosl-03), gcc-snapshot (4d 15h 1m, rv-osuosl-04), kicad (11h 8m, rv-manda-01), mpich (7h 14m, rv-manda-04), pyside6 (5h 26m, rv-manda-03), freecad (5h 9m, rv-osuosl-05), jpeg-xl (4h
On 2024-12-26 22:52:37 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:4h 19m, rv-osuosl-02)
I'd like to get a sense of whether the following situation on riscv64 is just pure bad luck or if that's something that we should expect to run
into in a regular fashion:
1: gcc-14 (11d 11h 30m, rv-manda-02), graph-tool (4d 19h 33m, rv-osuosl-03), gcc-snapshot (4d 15h 1m, rv-osuosl-04), kicad (11h 8m, rv-manda-01), mpich (7h 14m, rv-manda-04), pyside6 (5h 26m, rv-manda-03), freecad (5h 9m, rv-osuosl-05), jpeg-xl (
To some extent this is bad luck with uploads of packages that take a
long time to build. From my experience with the last couple of
transitions, riscv64 was reasonable fast to work though the rebuilds.
Also https://buildd.debian.org/stats/riscv64.png suggests that the
backlog is usually not too bad. Note that the current peak of packages
in Needs-Build is due to low priority rebuilds of hundreds of packages
with outdated Built-Using.