| Sysop: | Amessyroom |
|---|---|
| Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
| Users: | 43 |
| Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
| Uptime: | 104:21:35 |
| Calls: | 290 |
| Files: | 905 |
| Messages: | 76,612 |
Hi Adam,[...]
On 8/25/24 15:26, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
I noticed that there's a xen upload in the stable-new queue, which
claims to have been uploaded by you.
I'm afraid that we can't accept it currently, because it is a newer
version than is currently in unstable and testing:
Fair enough. I just read this after finishing the accompanying bts
bug report, which also mentions that.
We're running into problems with 4.17.5-1 for unstable, which is most
likely related to compatibility issues with newer ocaml in unstable.
On Sun, 2024-08-25 at 15:59 +0200, Hans van Kranenburg wrote:
Hi Adam,[...]
On 8/25/24 15:26, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
I noticed that there's a xen upload in the stable-new queue, which
claims to have been uploaded by you.
I'm afraid that we can't accept it currently, because it is a newer
version than is currently in unstable and testing:
Fair enough. I just read this after finishing the accompanying bts
bug report, which also mentions that.
We're running into problems with 4.17.5-1 for unstable, which is most
likely related to compatibility issues with newer ocaml in unstable.
We now have 4.19.1 in unstable, and after DSA 5836-1, both 4.17.5-
1~deb12u1 and 4.17.5+23-ga4e5191dc0-1 in stable-new. Should the former
be rejected in favour of the version from the DSA?
I'm tempted to leave the packages in stable-new in any case until the
new version manages to migrate to testing, just to avoid any potential
Hi,
On 28/12/2024 22:43, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Sun, 2024-08-25 at 15:59 +0200, Hans van Kranenburg wrote:
Hi Adam,[...]
On 8/25/24 15:26, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
I noticed that there's a xen upload in the stable-new queue, which
claims to have been uploaded by you.
I'm afraid that we can't accept it currently, because it is a newer
version than is currently in unstable and testing:
Fair enough. I just read this after finishing the accompanying bts
bug report, which also mentions that.
We're running into problems with 4.17.5-1 for unstable, which is most
likely related to compatibility issues with newer ocaml in unstable.
We now have 4.19.1 in unstable, and after DSA 5836-1, both 4.17.5- 1~deb12u1 and 4.17.5+23-ga4e5191dc0-1 in stable-new. Should the former
be rejected in favour of the version from the DSA?
I'm tempted to leave the packages in stable-new in any case until the
new version manages to migrate to testing, just to avoid any potential
Sorry for the confusion.
Some people in the team had some struggles last year (*cough*).
We have 4.19.1-1 right now in sid, yay.
You can totally disregard and/or delete the 4.17.5-1~deb12u1 thing.
The 4.17.5+23-ga4e5191dc0-1 security update is the newer thing we want instead.