On 28/12/2024 12:03, Phil Wyett wrote:

???


Hi Phil,

just F.Y.I, I am seeing several emails from you each week,
including the one I'm replying to here, that have no body!

Maybe its my email reader (Thunderbird).

Is anyone else having this problem?



Cheers,
Peter

P.S.  This mail has nothing to do with #1091541, its just an example.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On 30/12/2024 18:07, Peter B wrote:

Maybe its my email reader (Thunderbird).

Is anyone else having this problem?

Same here, blank email in Thunderbird.

View source shows it's a normal email. Its Content-Type implies it's
signed, however there is no signature at the end of it.


--
Regards,
Ahmad

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Monday, December 30, 2024 11:07:04 AM MST Peter B wrote:

On 28/12/2024 12:03, Phil Wyett wrote:

???

Hi Phil,

just F.Y.I, I am seeing several emails from you each week,
including the one I'm replying to here, that have no body!

Maybe its my email reader (Thunderbird).

Is anyone else having this problem?

I don’t receive empty emails from Phil, and I don’t receive any email problems
several times per week, but I do receive truncated emails from Phil about twice a month. So far I haven’t been able to determine the cause, and when I
ask him to resend them to me they come through in full. I am using KMail, but I don’t think the client matters.

--
Soren Stoutner
soren@debian.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEJKVN2yNUZnlcqOI+wufLJ66wtgMFAmdy5DgACgkQwufLJ66w tgOCPg//Zpr9SQ6w8g+JKnhK6gPTZBj+ZpUR+KtTOrhvf1BqBV0nKZpqAncvNnsB mThA6wr3/wGJf1q03XTcJZ8ZrSesZLuWkNuBNcWY3m+oNx1EFmI6nfUYC2+BqgSI fSJtaaSuI0u32QGEjyHHG5L4B6qxuoa5OI+PF0mKiN8NW7kZWGyZYAvBH4hIoMoc uVj9LGaSfxShVh/a9pnnErUjPXArQVQ8B2C7v7zdq/JRY807AxKcm7nsuCwlNcwJ F4NmT4zSgwadrmiIKiI+ivBidrEZohQDvOu2LDkPZfOh8sZfQFGVzfQ9+6XPsBf9 a5USz438BsBfavtB/sFsmsfuG9h6FdAXlRPMHyKlWe6RlOXTGumP1M30P96i/qYx +kbQIhl0vfHn1AzkYJ4KIamYpy4aiyoXocnkzxLgIl8+QDCFCPi8r2Xjwdth7Kuj XfpbNfwmxgeW8QowkUAAkT4HkFcYDHI4wEfLxkbeJByWCa1Ih2NKgm+Zhyo2EKZN o9aSnK3d7M+x6a2Y39U3/VtjM/ZuWjjtGydt5Rhs4DoOUVqstDBkxGQ9wr0P/r+R ImLjHt4Bll4fDeEIPKn6Ibk4yCsAV99Lo4hdAIta7GW6tjQYaJJqen51CT0juBs1 KZiJ+PRLxRjP4/dp/kFJX/ABOQNKgQMKwhMN3NOxarZiFgxdnVw=
=8ztF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Mon, 2024-12-30 at 19:21 +0100, Niels Thykier wrote:

Peter B:

On 28/12/2024 12:03, Phil Wyett wrote:

???

Hi Phil,

just F.Y.I, I am seeing several emails from you each week,
including the one I'm replying to here, that have no body!

Maybe its my email reader (Thunderbird).

Is anyone else having this problem?

Cheers,
Peter

P.S.  This mail has nothing to do with #1091541, its just an example.

Hi Peter,

Philip's email does have a body. Using the `thunderbird`'s `View Source` shows a proper body. It also shows up for me correctly if I set `Message Body as` -> `Simple HTML`.

I think it is a bug in thunderbird, since the body does seem to be
regular text, and thunderbird should just render it as such (but indeed
the mail you quoted does not show a body for me in Thunderbird by
default either when having `Message Body as` -> `Plain text`).

Best regards,
Niels

Hi Peter and Niels,

This is the first time I have had such a report.

All my emails are sent as plain text from Evolution on RHEL 9.x.

As Niels has indicated, this maybe an issue with thunderbird. I hope this can be rectified soon, I may not have much good to say, but I do like know people see my nonsense. :-)

Regards

Phil

--

Donations...

Buy Me A Coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/kathenasorg

--

"I play the game for the game’s own sake"

Arthur Conan Doyle - The Adventure of the Bruce-Partington Plans

--

Internet Relay Chat (IRC): kathenas

Website: https://kathenas.org

Instagram: https://instagram.com/kathenasorg

Threads: https://www.threads.net/@kathenasorg

--

















-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQJOBAABCAA4FiEEcKCsRax3nv6E9jrtckqptS8CTIsFAmdy6NoaHHBoaWxpcC53 eWV0dEBrYXRoZW5hcy5vcmcACgkQckqptS8CTIvUww/+LOZa8UatKmYUedu8Jzwo QejcryMexWGUmUkNi2gd3ny+Eio1zXncFuMAlc3jwHD9MUvz9hRsPY1rNJXFPsGi 6oqEDqfzren63jksAdGoSGZX0akGU8iILWuZ0ANxmQiSlt0gtI1ffJxtj2Xnt3Mf Z72tEyRUF++wx4TSEuAMV9hSmPQRcxKan7Nb6GKkUCTS5WtLAnFnP8u4gtIcNpd8 OjrfR/gSJ6DZL80IKA11VIkbrIVDsOLS5NkecZJlpHrkKmEOsAfGzvIyNdv1InLN qub7D5anNEPaLaGokHtGQcs3Wr1nj6SySNSJ7f/R0FSN6mifkUfvMh142hCo/VRH Ptf9FlybCXv2DYgtbngDK8YLXmlgw9Hn6Ul0P7S3sXo3SUnwFsP8dXKqIVT7q7vh edhWwmh+O9RTlTNVZyuZBrKiEJsHf8rD+TqGiWR3u2TGAMWMy

Hi,

Thanks for that report!

Le 2024-12-30 19:07, Peter B a écrit :

just F.Y.I, I am seeing several emails from you each week,
including the one I'm replying to here, that have no body!

Maybe its my email reader (Thunderbird).

Is anyone else having this problem?

My (outdated) version of Thunderbird displays them but I kept getting
"server errors" trying to display these messages with the webmail (a
customized Roundcube) so I investigated, and it appears that the PGP
signature is missing in the received message.

To: 1091675@bugs.debian.org
Cc: 1091675-submitter@bugs.debian.org
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256";
protocol="application/pgp-signature";
boundary="=-RaetrrmXSmQxlMjD0sCh"
Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2024 00:04:00 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Evolution 3.40.4 (3.40.4-10.el9_5.1)
X-AuthUser: philip.wyett@kathenas.org
Resent-From: Debian BTS <debbugs@buxtehude.debian.org>

(...)
(message as text/plain MIME part)
(no other MIME part)

--=-RaetrrmXSmQxlMjD0sCh--

( ^-- correct end of multipart MIME message)

The signature was present in the message as received by the BTS [1], but apparently the BTS drops the signature while forwarding the message.
Could possibly be a "feature" if it changed the MIME type while doing
so, but done this way this looks definitely like a bug. I would suggest
Phil to file a bug against the BTS, reporting this misbehaviour.

Best wishes,

[1]: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1091675;msg=10
(look for signature.asc at the bottom)

--
Julien Plissonneau Duquène

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)