• Bug#1102604: rescue-mode: Provide rootfs subvolume selection menu

    From Nicholas D Steeves@21:1/5 to martin-eric.racine@iki.fi on Tue May 13 22:30:01 2025
    XPost: linux.debian.maint.boot

    Hello Martin-Éric,

    First off, when I wrote "this has been a desired basic feature for many
    years, so I'm optimistic about it, in time" I didn't realise that the
    "in time" bit would be ignored. "In time" means "not right now", and
    I'm surprised that "I'm optimistic" was interpreted as "push harder and
    you'll get what you want". To be explicit, what I meant is: Not now.
    I'm optimistic that we can get this later, but really, not now.

    Martin-Éric Racine <martin-eric.racine@iki.fi> writes:

    Why not?

    In addition to what others have explained:

    Unless it's security-related, stable updates are minimal, and always
    occur after testing updates. Consequently, there needs to be a trixie
    D-I and rescue-mode first. Maybe that will be alpha2, maybe that will
    be the cycle after. Bookworm D-I and rescue-mode changes can maybe
    happen after that, and that's when you were asked to ping us. In other
    words: not now.

    Btw, there's another compelling reason for backporting this: The
    GRUB-EFI version that ships with Trixie currently barfs on common ASUS motherboards. This makes Bookworm d-i the only usable way to rescue
    those EFI hosts but, without that resuce mode backport, it requires a
    lot of manual typing of mount commands just to get around the
    subvolume issue.

    I hope you will consider reanalysing your conclusion vis à vis the facts
    you presented:

    Given

    1. A trixie (testing) issue at what sounds like RC severity that makes
    the default installation unusable for a number of popular systems (ASUS
    motherboards) that has no workaround in trixie.
    2. A bookworm bug of normal severity for a non-default installation
    that has a workaround in bookworm, but that is inconvenient.

    Do you really think that an inconvenience is more significant than what
    you've presented as a release critical bug that affects the default installation?


    Kind regards,
    Nicholas

    P.S. For the record, I'm Debian's btrfs-progs maintainer, I believe in
    btrfs and want to see it succeed, and I'm sorry for the inconvenience in bookworm's rescue-mode.

    --=-=-Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

    iQJEBAEBCgAuFiEE4qYmHjkArtfNxmcIWogwR199EGEFAmgjqsUQHHN0ZW5AZGVi aWFuLm9yZwAKCRBaiDBHX30QYYS6D/977sUFZBZu2TkXgrTaqf9XZjieF5ti3aTs 0RGLLUqxV1mc7bWobLAJ40FFsQC9D2NUuHSlbTp7Gm5KdnNpEo6RaOV2WzkPc/P2 Sj6oRyheB7UNTV5L7FzNk2bQQJld9q9u/osXs06AZBel1bCIzakq1jj+ic0cpCpY rhyzPNIaAzpVCCN8YzlgnB6CXpl0I8lTlDnwpOUv5AOlZS39ZAswj6B4xZA5cekB HN7UV1ZP2I/gAp/D5ICv7WkdrjAfFLHZTAQdjl5mPCwvhfFMflYBRE7APdXL+Ry4 ppebhjwB4U0dpyY5f6aCrXJfVcF1iJGRyGihhJTHi28ToIiK+P0ybmWtYwZB0VZ7 BDBxnh9t3yIYoQzA9n3TnbpXJZMYt8i9OM03SR+okyo7oJFgEk1sUyhHh4YFQ6uL qRTeeLII3v/Q6zgMHETfE/xd+yIE/yScl+B7o8Lg1w/hc25zbTh8LcYYf+3EAYtN tnxtA1p4wUVofxD2zfW7c4lxG7RF7Y0vR3Wlwa6r4Kezt2l0X5DSV1eB2qNgtNuE PJPeKMwi8+4O5ow3pfm7nu6T3Bj9otNZLydiAJcKwzbgjGO+xarZgAd/lRis0P31 YGPy/9ujuQQ1+NhQ+Kf6gKHPTwU+GS5QJYOZqhuRKr6BNCjdwhUzr5amUHzNNc54 M6iVmBnWog==gYHO
    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)