Sysop: | Amessyroom |
---|---|
Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
Users: | 43 |
Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
Uptime: | 100:11:02 |
Calls: | 290 |
Files: | 905 |
Messages: | 76,507 |
I think we should add a mention of `architecture-properties` next to `Architecture`. Maybe something like:
"""
Additionally, if you believe the list of supported architectures is pretty constant, you should change any to a list of supported architectures in debian/control or add a Build-Depends on one of the
`architecture-properties` provided names such as `architecture-is-64-bit`. This way, the build will not be performed on the relevant architectures, and indicate this to a human reader.
"""
This also changes the note about the build "will fail". In my understanding, the buildds will **not** try these builds (anymore?). At least, the buildds now say `$ARCH is not present in the architecture list set by the
maintainer` rather than showing a build log. For the newly added snippet about `architecture-properties`, they instead goes into a "permanent" `Dep-Wait` state.
Either way, saying "the build will fail also" feels like a stretch to me given it stops "before" the build ever happens.