• Bug#1091541: RFS: asmc-linux/0.0~git20241215.7dbd9df-1 [ITP] -- Masm co

    From Jeroen Ploemen@21:1/5 to yokota on Fri Jan 3 11:10:01 2025
    On Thu, 2 Jan 2025 03:36:59 +0900
    yokota <yokota.hgml@gmail.com> wrote:

    I fixed the issues and updated salsa.

    Thank you for the update, the added comment in d/copyright is very
    informative. Funny how that notice was hiding in plain sight yet so
    hard to spot.

    Anyway, that leaves just one issue: the upstream copyright statement
    embedded in src/logo.s lacks an explicit license grant detailing what
    specific versions of the GPL apply. Now they do include a copy of the
    GPL-2 and I don't doubt releasing their code under that license is
    intended, but even assuming for a moment that's sufficient proof for
    the FTP Masters (for GPL-2 only), it still leaves the "or any later
    version" part of the current d/copyright unsubstantiated.

    Is there any statement from upstream about what specific version or
    versions of the GPL they want to apply to their code?

    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

    iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEd8lhnEnWos3N8v+qQoMEoXSNzHoFAmd3taoACgkQQoMEoXSN zHqY4Q/9HF7NxoQGFpQNbGD6dTWXXQhIcVenfkv9LPDCNp9w38i0s06ff2HdDh8d UGRDbZ3rY91bmSUh+Irxv2ddj0T+NeE0Cmy3rP9PMKxo+O5loYlHzJZP9zFepJbK id+GuGPT/wOWOqqEGhWfheFiyZx40vpi3dA+AZMiP/y0UW9SlIBmFshcNtwLJpXj 1aQLEoLXLbiZ8wa6nP0rDnNIMR7hB7XP7RJ2LHXAF4DRLQQzV8L2AAcVDkEu6HAo nyxOSCVkStEaOJfFCspE1ZT/PcN4icVvdgc9BtVVZYfyEZOFqDTXvkHXyWIS5cYF +bM148nK5nAZIixjW89scAKeXOD2IjPguiw2F83vhyd8IbdXGwJtXyQYFcchnoX3 Q2ogSdA/1kczPeLh7/id0YgNUChQLPmD0XCxb162rhRagwevvAFZKKZv1kkABcpc MVOOZZamQKrBIoW1oklRxD2h1umD3+17mhWfLdItaL+4xMPT/CYU9j8M5acxyW58 01niI1KbXOkBlQy1QD1x8ePHCleC7rDacZCL1LhAJhTiOlJumIxrCroDtJ+vHqCB QnNt9CB1rTmABrf4SdjChYsTT919o6VYcZXKpR4DwvyTMkRQbqIWgANUIfVqqegG PeCPJQpOr+x9XO2vPVibCSfoe1XVVXTHFDp93HpsCKe7AFTEHNo=
    =jaB6
    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)